Accidental dural puncture,postdural puncture headache,intrathecal catheters,and epidural blood patch: revisiting the old nemesis

One of the controversial management options for accidental dural puncture in pregnant patients is the conversion of labor epidural analgesia to continuous spinal analgesia by threading the epidural catheter intrathecally. No clear consensus exists on how to best prevent severe headache from occurring after accidental dural puncture. To investigate whether the intrathecal placement of an epidural catheter following accidental dural puncture impacts the incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) and the subsequent need for an epidural blood patch in parturients. A retrospective chart review of accidental dural puncture was performed at Hutzel Women’s Hospital in Detroit, MI, USA for the years 2002–2010. Documented cases of accidental dural punctures (N = 238) were distributed into two groups based on their management: an intrathecal catheter (ITC) group in which the epidural catheter was inserted intrathecally and a non-intrathecal catheter (non-ITC) group that received the epidural catheter inserted at different levels of lumbar interspaces. The incidence of PDPH as well as the necessity for epidural blood patch was analyzed using two-tailed Fisher’s exact test. In the non-ITC group, 99 (54 %) parturients developed PDPH in comparison to 20 (37 %) in the ITC [odds ratio (OR), 1.98; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.06–3.69; P = 0.03]. Fifty-seven (31 %) of 182 patients in the non-ITC group required an epidural blood patch (EBP) (data for 2 patients of 184 were missing). In contrast, 7 (13 %) of parturients in the ITC group required an EBP. The incidence of EBP was calculated in parturients who actually developed headache to be 57 of 99 (57 %) in the non-ITC group versus 7 of 20 (35 %) in the ITC group (OR, 2.52; 95 % CI, 0.92–6.68; P = 0.07). The insertion of an intrathecal catheter following accidental dural puncture decreases the incidence of PDPH but not the need for epidural blood patch in parturients.     

Efficacy of a prophylactic epidural blood patch in preventing post dural puncture headache in parturients after inadvertent dural puncture

BACKGROUND: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) occurs in up to 80% of parturients who experience inadvertent dural puncture during epidural catheter placement. The authors performed a randomized double blind study to assess the effect of prophylactic epidural blood patch on the incidence of PDPH and the need for therapeutic epidural blood patch. METHODS: Sixty-four parturients who incurred inadvertent dural puncture were randomized to receive a prophylactic epidural blood patch with 20 ml autologous blood (prophylactic epidural blood patch group) or a sham patch (sham group). Subjects were evaluated daily for development of PDPH for a minimum of 5 days after dural puncture. Those who developed a PDPH were followed daily for a minimum of 3 days after resolution of the headache. Subjects with moderate headaches who reported difficulties performing childcare activities and all those with severe headaches were advised to receive a therapeutic epidural blood patch. RESULTS: Eighteen of 32 subjects in each group (56%) developed PDPH. Therapeutic blood patch was recommended in similar numbers of patients in each group. The groups had similar onset time of PDPH, median peak pain scores, and number of days spent unable to perform childcare activities as a result of postural headache. The median duration of PDPH, however, was shorter in the prophylactic epidural blood patch group. CONCLUSIONS: A decrease in the incidence of PDPH or the need for criteria-directed therapeutic epidural patch was not detected when a prophylactic epidural blood patch was administered to parturients after inadvertent dural puncture. However, prophylactic epidural blood patch did shorten the duration of PDPH symptoms.     

Efficacy of a Prophylactic Epidural Blood Patch in Preventing Post Dural Puncture Headache in Parturients after Inadvertent Dural Puncture

Background: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) occurs in up to 80% of parturients who experience inadvertent dural puncture during epidural catheter placement. The authors performed a randomized double blind study to assess the effect of prophylactic epidural blood patch on the incidence of PDPH and the need for therapeutic epidural blood patch.

Methods: Sixty-four parturients who incurred inadvertent dural puncture were randomized to receive a prophylactic epidural blood patch with 20 ml autologous blood (prophylactic epidural blood patch group) or a sham patch (sham group). Subjects were evaluated daily for development of PDPH for a minimum of 5 days after dural puncture. Those who developed a PDPH were followed daily for a minimum of 3 days after resolution of the headache. Subjects with moderate headaches who reported difficulties performing childcare activities and all those with severe headaches were advised to receive a therapeutic epidural blood patch.

Results: Eighteen of 32 subjects in each group (56%) developed PDPH. Therapeutic blood patch was recommended in similar numbers of patients in each group. The groups had similar onset time of PDPH, median peak pain scores, and number of days spent unable to perform childcare activities as a result of postural headache. The median duration of PDPH, however, was shorter in the prophylactic epidural blood patch group.     

High quality labour analgesia using small gauge epidural needles and catheters

PURPOSE: Inadvertent epidural needle punctures represent the leading cause of severe postdural puncture headache (PDPH) in parturients. Use of small gauge (G) epidural needles for continuous analgesia has received little attention despite possible important reductions in PDPH. We report the first study to examine the feasibility of using small G Tuohy needles and 23 G catheters for labour analgesia. METHODS: Healthy parturients 30 min), recognized dural puncture, PDPH, patient assessment of analgesia within 24 hr of delivery, complications and anesthesiologist satisfaction. RESULTS: Twenty-seven parturients were recruited. Successful blocks were initiated and maintained in 24/27 who rated overall analgesia from good to excellent (19/24 very good to excellent). Three block failures occurred at the initiation phase only (two unilateral, one absent). There was no evidence of catheter kinking after placement. One patient developed PDPH after unrecognized dural puncture which was self-treated with acetaminophen for four days, followed by complete symptom resolution. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to provide high quality labour analgesia using small G epidural needles and catheters. The effect of small G epidural needles on PDPH warrants future study.     

Decreased incidence of headache after accidental dural puncture in caesarean delivery patients receiving continuous postoperative intrathecal analgesia

To examine the effects of prolonged (> 24 h) intrathecal catheterization with the use of postoperative analgesia on the incidence of post–dural puncture headache (PDPH), charts of 45 obstetric patients who had accidental dural puncture following attempts at epidural block were reviewed retrospectively. Three groups were identified: Group I (n = 15) patients had a dural puncture on the first attempt at epidural block, but successful epidural block on a repeated attempt; Group II (n=17) patients had a dural puncture with immediate conversion to continuous spinal anaesthesia with catheterization lasting only for the duration of caesarean delivery; Group III (n= 13) patients had an immediate conversion to spinal anaesthesia and received post–caesarean section continuous intrathecal patient–controlled analgesia consisting of fentanyl 5 (ig'ml^-1 with bupivacaine 0.25 mg·ml^-1 and epinephrine 2 μg·ml^-1 with catheterization lasting >24 h. No parturient in group III developed a PDPH. This was substantially lower ( P < 0.009) than the 33% incidence for group I and the 47% incidence for group II. The incidence of a PDPH did not differ between group I and II. Similarly, there was no difference between group I and II with regard to requests for a blood patch. Patients receiving continuous intrathecal analgesia had excellent pain relief, could easily ambulate and none complained of pruritus, nausea, vomiting, sensory loss or weakness. In conclusion, indwelling spinal catheterization > 24 h with continuous intrathecal analgesia following accidental dural puncture in parturients may for some patients be a suitable method for providing PDPH prophylaxis and postoperative analgesia.     

Dural puncture in obstetric analgesia. Epidemiologic features and therapeutic management]

OBJECTIVE: To assess the time of occurrence, circumstances and presenting symptoms of unintentional dural puncture (UDP), the location and intensity of postdural puncture headaches (PDPH), and the efficacy of their treatment by epidural blood-patch (EBP). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. PATIENTS: Cases of UDP recorded over a 4-year period in an obstetric anaesthesia unit. METHODS: The following variables were studied: maternal age, weight and height, hour of occurrence and number of puncture attempts, existence of reflux of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through the needle, experience of the practitioners, subsequent modalities of obstetrical analgesia, frequency of occurrence, clinical characteristics and therapeutic management of PDPH. In case of EBP, the amount of blood and the efficacy of the procedure were also recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients presented with UDP (0.66%). No reflux of CSF was identified in nine cases. Most UDP occurred at the first or second attempt, usually when performed by a practitioner poorly trained in epidural analgesia in obstetrics. The risk of UDP was higher during night-time work (risk ratio: 3.0; 95% confidence interval: 1.1-8.0; p = 0.04). Subsequent analgesia was provided via the epidural route in 19 cases, subarachnoidal route in one, and intravenous route in one case. PDPH did not develop in two patients. Three patients were given prophylactic EPB, and 16 received curative EBP. A second EBP was required 24 h later in seven patients. One patient developed meralgia paresthetica following EBP. CONCLUSION: In parturients, UDP usually results in PDPH. A rapid and effective treatment is required, mainly EBP. Another EBP is eventually necessary in some patients.     

Intrathecal catheter insertion during labour reduces the risk of postdural puncture headache

Purpose

To describe the anaesthetic management and report the incidence of PDPH in three parturients who had experienced accidental durai puncture during labour and the subsequent deliberate intrathecal insertion of an epidural catheter.

Clinical features

Inadvertent durai puncture with a 16-gauge Tuohy needle occurred during the first stage of labour at 3–4 cm cervical dilatation in all three women. The 20-gauge epidural catheter was immediately inserted into the subarachnoid space after accidental durai penetration. Intermittent intrathecal injections of lidocaine or bupivacaine with fentanyl were administered to provide analgesia during labour and delivery. Two of the women had spontaneous vaginal deliveries, whereas Caesarean section was performed in one case due to acute fetal distress during the second stage of labour. The intrathecal catheter was left in-situ for 13–19 hr after delivery and the women were questioned daily for symptoms of PDPH. None of the three women developed PDPH after dural puncture and intrathecal catheterisation with the epidural catheter.

Conclusion

Immediate intrathecal insertion of the epidural catheter after accidental durai puncture during labour proved to be an effective prophylactic technique to prevent PDPH in these three parturients.     

Management of accidental dural puncture and post-dural puncture headache after labour: a Nordic survey

Background: A major risk with epidural analgesia is accidental dural puncture (ADP), which may result in post‐dural puncture headache (PDPH). This survey was conducted to explore the incidence of ADP, the policy for management of PDPH and the educational practices in epidural analgesia during labour in the Nordic countries. Methods: A postal questionnaire was sent to the anaesthesiologist responsible for Obstetric anaesthesia service in all maternity units (n=153) with questions relating to the year 2008. Results: The overall response rate was 93%. About 32% (22–47%) of parturients received epidural analgesia for labour. There were databases for registering obstetric epidural complications in 13% of Danish, 24% of Norwegian and Swedish, 43% of Finnish and 100% of hospitals in Iceland. The estimated incidence of ADP was 1% (n≈900). Epidural blood patch (EBP) was performed in 86% (n≈780) of the parturients. The most common time interval from diagnosis to performing EBP was 24–48 h. The success rate for EBP was >75% in 67% (62–79%) of hospitals. The use of diagnostic CT/MRI before the first or the second EBP was exceptional. No major complication was reported. Teaching of epidurals was commonest (86%) in the non‐obstetric population and 53% hospitals desired a formal training programme in obstetric analgesia. Conclusion: We found the incidence of ADP to be approximately 1%. EBP was the commonest method used for its management, and the success rate was high in most hospitals. Formal training in epidural analgesia was absent in most countries and trainees first performed it in the non‐obstetric population.     

Treatment of accidental dural puncture during obstetric epidural analgesia

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of continuous intrathecal analgesia as prophylaxis for postdural puncture headache (PDPH) and for analgesia during labor in 12 patients who suffered accidental dural puncture. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 920 patients who received spinal analgesia during labor were enrolled. Group A (no accidental dural puncture) received a single dose of 10 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine, and 5 minutes later continuous epidural infusion of 0.125% ropivacaine and 3 micromg mL(-1) was started at a rate of a 5 mL h(-1); a 5 mL bolus dose was allowed every 20 minutes if needed. In patients who suffered accidental dural puncture (Group B) we inserted an intrathecal catheter to administer an initial dose of 3 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine and the same analgesic mixture at the same dose as was administered in Group A. Patient characteristics, analgesic efficacy, duration of labor and delivery, motor blockade, analgesic volume, and incidence of PDPH were recorded. The Student t test was used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: No significant differences in duration of labor and delivery, analgesic efficacy, or motor blockade were observed. The incidence of PDPH was 16.6% in Group B and 0.33% in Group A. The patients in Group B required more additional bolus doses: 10 (SD, 2) in Group B and 3 (1.25) in Group A (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous intrathecal analgesia after accidental dural puncture was a safe way to provide analgesia during labor and to reduce the expected incidence of PDPH.     

The injection of intrathecal normal saline reduces the severity of postdural puncture headache

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether the injection of 10 mL of normal saline into the subarachnoid space following accidental dural puncture reduced the incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) and the need for epidural blood patch (EBP). METHODS: Twenty-eight patients who experienced accidental dural puncture with an epidural needle had 10 mL of normal saline injected into the subarachnoid space. In 22 patients, the injection was performed immediately through the epidural needle. In 6 patients who had intrathecal catheters placed through the epidural needle, the saline was injected through the catheter before removal. All other patients who experienced wet taps during the same period that the study was in progress but did not receive the saline injection served as a control group, 26 in number. Patients with severe or persistent PDPHs were treated with EBP. RESULTS: Of those patients who received intrathecal normal saline immediately through the epidural needle, 32% developed a headache compared with 62% of controls. Of these, 1 patient who received saline required EBP compared with nine in the control group (P =.004). Of those patients who had intrathecal catheters placed, there were no headaches in the saline group of 6 compared with 3 in the control group of 5, 1 of whom was treated with EBP (P >.05). CONCLUSIONS: The immediate injection of 10 mL intrathecal normal saline after a wet tap significantly reduced the incidence of PDPH and the need for EBP. When an intrathecal catheter had been placed following a wet tap, injection of 10 mL of normal saline before its removal effectively prevented PDPH.     

PDPH is a common complication of neuraxial blockade in parturients: a meta-analysis of obstetrical studies

PURPOSE: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is an iatrogenic complication of neuraxial blockade. We systematically reviewed the literature on parturients to determine the frequency, onset, and duration of PDPH. METHODS: Citations on PDPH in the obstetrical population were identified by computerized searches, citation review, and hand searches of abstracts and conference proceedings. Citations were included if they contained extractable data on frequency, onset, or duration of PDPH. Using meta-analysis, we calculated pooled estimates of the frequency of accidental dural puncture for epidural needles and pooled estimates of the frequencies of PDPH for epidural and spinal needles. RESULTS: Parturients have approximately a 1.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5% to 1.5%) risk of accidental dural puncture with epidural insertion. Of these, approximately half (52.1%; 95% CI, 51.4% to 52.8%) will result in PDPH. The risk of PDPH from spinal needles diminishes with small diameter, atraumatic needles, but is still appreciable (Whitacre 27-gauge needle 1.7%; 95% CI, 1.6% to 1.8%). PDPH occurs as early as one day and as late as seven days after dural puncture and lasts 12 hr to seven days. CONCLUSION: PDPH is a common complication for parturients undergoing neuraxial blockade.     

Expectant management of postdural puncture headache increases hospital length of stay and emergency room visits

PURPOSE: This retrospective cohort study examined hospital length of stay (LOS) and emergency room (ER) visits in parturients diagnosed with postdural puncture headache (PDPH) following recognized dural puncture (DP). All cases were managed expectantly. Outcomes were compared with matched controls with uneventful labour epidurals. METHODS: After Ethics Committee approval, the hospital perinatal database was used to identify healthy parturients with recognized DP during labour epidural placement from 1996-2001. Women developing PDPH after expectant management were matched with women with uneventful epidurals and no evidence of PDPH, as well as by parity, delivery mode and admission date. All women delivered term singletons. The primary outcome was LOS (hours) from delivery to discharge. Secondary outcomes included: number (#) nights in hospital, #ER visits for PDPH, epidural blood patch (EBP) timing (pre vs post discharge), EBP location (ward vs ER) and blood volumes used. RESULTS: 26 cases and 26 controls were identified. Precise discharge times were found for 23 cases and 23 controls. In cases, the LOS was increased by a mean of 17 +/- 23.8 (SD) hours; [95% conficence interval (CI) = 8, 26; P = 0.0012] and # nights in hospital was increased by a mean of 0.62 +/- 0.94 nights (95% CI, 0.26, 0.98, P = 0.0027). Nineteen cases (73% 19/26) received at least one EBP. Sixteen cases received at least one EBP prior to discharge with 38% (6/16) returning to ER for re-assessment/repeat EBP. Forty-four percent (4/9) of cases without an EBP prior to discharge returned to ER for further assessment/EBP. CONCLUSION: PDPH leads to a significant increase in hospital LOS and ER visits. Studies of preventive therapy are warranted.     

Epidural blood patch for management of postdural puncture headache in adolescents

BACKGROUND: In some patients spinal puncture (SP) is followed by postdural puncture headache (PDPH). When the symptoms of PDPH are severe and are not relieved within a few days an epidural blood patch (EBP) might be performed. The aim of this survey was to review requests for EBPs and to evaluate the effectiveness of EBP in patients aged 13-18 years during a 6.5 year period ending in June 2001. METHODS: The Information System Patient Measures Database was interrogated to identify patients who were referred for EBP. After identification, the patients' medical records were reviewed in detail for the characteristics of PDPH and other symptoms, and for the effectiveness of the EBP. RESULTS: Forty-two EBPs were performed after 40 SPs on 37 patients (24 girls, 13 boys). Epidural blood patches were performed twice in five patients. The reasons for repeating the procedure were repeat SP with new PDPH in three patients and an unsatisfactory effect in two patients. Twenty-eight of the 40 spinal punctures (70%) had been performed for diagnostic use and 10 (25%) for spinal anesthesia. Two patients (5%) developed PDPH after inadvertent dural puncture with an epidural needle. In 37 cases the criteria for PDPH were fulfilled, and one patient had a cerebrospinal fluid fistula headache. Two-thirds of the girls had associated symptoms of headache compared with one-third of the boys. Epidural blood patch was performed 1-22 days after SP with 0.2 ml/kg (mean) of autologous blood injected into the epidural space. The success rate of the first injection was 37 out of 40 EBP (93%), and the second injection was effective in both patients with recurred PDPH. CONCLUSION: Epidural blood patch seems to be an effective and safe procedure in adolescents for treating severe and persistent PDPH.     

Decreased incidence of headache after unintentional dural puncture in patients with cesarean delivery administered with postoperative epidural analgesia

Purpose  To investigate how subsequent placement of a catheter into the epidural space after unintentional dural puncture for postoperative analgesia for 36–72 h affected the incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). Methods  The records of 52 parturients who had had accidental dural puncture in cesarean delivery were reviewed. The parturients were assigned to two groups. Twenty-eight parturients were assigned to the study group, in whom an epidural catheter was inserted and was used for anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Twenty-four parturients were assigned to the control group, in whom spinal anesthesia (n = 20) or general anesthesia (n = 4) was applied. For postoperative analgesia in patients with incision pain above visual analog scale (VAS) 3, 3 mg morphine in 15 ml saline was administered through the epidural catheter in the study group, while intramuscular meperidine or tramadol was administered in the control group. Once PDPH was observed, conservative treatment was tried first. If the headache persisted despite conservative treatment, an epidural blood patch was applied through the catheter or a reinserted epidural needle. Results  The study group demonstrated significant reduction of the incidence of PDPH and reduction in the indication for an epidural blood patch compared to the control group (7.1% vs 58% [P = 0.000] and 3.6% vs 37.5% [P = 0.002], respectively). Conclusion  Subsequent catheter placement into the epidural space after unintentional dural puncture in cesarean delivery and leaving the catheter for postoperative analgesia for 36–72 h may reduce the incidence of PDPH.     

Prevention of post‐dural puncture headache in parturients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Post‐dural puncture headaches (PDPHs) present an important clinical problem. We assessed methods to decrease accidental dural punctures (ADPs) and interventions to reduce PDPH following ADP. Multiple electronic databases were searched for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of parturients having labour epidurals, in which the studied intervention could plausibly affect ADP or PDPH, and the incidence of at least one of these was recorded. Forty RCTs (n = 11,536 epidural insertions) were included, studying combined spinal–epidurals (CSEs), loss of resistance medium, prophylactic epidural blood patches, needle bevel orientation, ultrasound‐guided insertion, epidural morphine, Special Sprotte needles, acoustic‐guided insertion, administration of cosyntropin, and continuous spinal analgesia. The RCTs for CSE, loss of resistance medium, and prophylactic epidural blood patches were meta‐analysed. Five methods reduced PDPH: prophylactic epidural blood patch {four trials, median quality score = 2, risk difference = ?0.48 [95% confidence interval (CI): ?0.88 to ?0.086]}, lateral positioning of the epidural needle bevel upon insertion (one trial, quality score = 1), Special Sprotte needles [one trial, quality score = 5, risk difference = ?0.44 (95% CI: ?0.67 to ?0.21)], epidural morphine [one trial, quality score = 4, risk difference = ?0.36 (95% CI ?0.59 to ?0.13)], and cosyntropin [one trial, quality score = 5, risk difference = ?0.36 (95% CI ?0.55 to ?0.16)]. Several methods potentially reduce PDPH. Special Sprotte needles, epidural morphine, and cosyntropin are thus far each supported by a single, albeit good quality trial. Prophylactic blood patches are supported by three trials, but these had flawed methodology. Mostly, trials were of limited quality, and further well‐conducted, large studies are needed.     

Post-dural puncture headache in the parturient

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common and debilitating complication of central neuraxial blockade in the parturient. The obstetric population is at particular risk with up to 80% of women developing symptoms after accidental dural puncture (ADP) during labour epidural insertion. PDPH typically develops 24–48 hours post puncture and is classically described as an occipito-frontal headache with postural features. Diagnosis and assessment should include consideration of other potential causes of post-partum headache. Initial treatment of PDPH includes adequate hydration and analgesics. Epidural blood patch (EBP) remains the gold standard treatment. It is more successful if performed over 24–48 hours after the development of symptoms. Complete and permanent relief of symptoms following a single EBP occurs in up to one third of cases where headache follows ADP with an epidural needle. Complete or partial relief may be seen in 50–80% overall. Higher success rates are achieved following a second EBP. There is now UK national guidance on the treatment of post dural puncture headache published by the Obstetric Anaesthetists Association (OAA).     

Fluoroscopically guided epidural blood patch in patients with postdural puncture headache after spinal and epidural anesthesia

Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the major complications after spinal and epidural anesthesia. An epidural blood patch (EBP) may be applied when PDPH persists regardless of conservative treatment. We describe the results of management including fluoroscopically guided EBP in a series of patients with moderate to severe PDPH. From January 2007 to December 2009, PDPH developed in 15 of 3,381 patients (0.44%) who received epidural or spinal anesthesia: 5 (0.21%) after general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia, 8 (0.81%) after spinal anesthesia, and 2 (3.14%) after combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. Of 15 patients, PDPH was relieved without the EBP in 9 patients and 6 patients required the EBP. EBP was performed under fluoroscopy in a prone position; a 4:1 mixture of autologous blood and contrast medium was injected to cover the site of dural puncture. The success rate of fluoroscopically guided EBP was 100% with a mean blood volume of 7.2 ml. No complications were associated with EBP except for a mild backache. Fluoroscopically guided EBP may be successfully and safely performed to treat persistent PDPH with a relatively small volume of blood for epidural injection.     

Intracranial subdural hematoma following dural puncture in a parturient with HELLP syndrome

PURPOSE: To present a case of postpartum bilateral intracranial subdural hematoma after dural puncture during attempted epidural analgesia for labour. CLINICAL FEATURES: This complication occurred following accidental dural puncture in a parturient with thrombocytopenia (99,000 x microL-1) who subsequently developed the syndrome of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets. On the first postoperative day, postdural puncture headache (PDPH) developed. An epidural blood patch (EBP) was deferred to the third postoperative day because of a platelet count of 21,000 x micro L-1. However, the headache intensified from a typical PDPH to one which was not posturally related. A second EBP was abandoned after the injection of 5 mL of blood because of increasing headache during the procedure. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed bilateral temporal subdural hematomas. The patient was managed conservatively and discharged home without any sequelae. CONCLUSION: It is conceivable that thrombocytopenia together with possible abnormal platelet function increased the risk of subdural hematoma. Alternative diagnoses to PDPH should be considered whenever headache is not posturally related.     

Intrathecal catheterization after unintentional dural puncture during orthopedic surgery

Purpose

We investigated whether inserting an intrathecal catheter and leaving it in place for 24 h after an unintentional dural puncture in orthopedic patients reduced the incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH).

Methods

The study consisted of 427 patients in whom a total of 21 unintentional dural punctures had occurred during orthopedic surgery performed between 2002 and 2006. Seven patients (phase I; evaluated retrospectively) each underwent placement of an epidural catheter at another level after dural puncture during the period January 2002 to February 2004. Fourteen patients (phase II; evaluated prospectively) received an epidural catheter through the dural tear after an unintentional dural puncture during the period February 2004–March 2006

Results

In phase I, 5 of the 7 patients experienced PDPH, and one required an epidural blood patch. In phase II, only one of the 14 patients complained of PDPH, which resolved after 48 h of medical therapy. No patient experienced paresthesia, neurologic or hemorrhagic complication, or infection.

Conclusion

Inserting an epidural catheter through the dural tear following an unintentional dural puncture and leaving it in place for 24 h significantly reduces the incidence of PDPH.     

Management of postdural puncture headache

Postdural puncture headache (PDPH), a complication of regional anesthesia, is not infrequently seen in parturients because of their inherent risk from young age and female gender. With spinal anesthesia, the risk of PDPH is mainly dependent on the size and type of needle and can be reduced with the use of small-gauge, pencilpoint spinal needles. For unintentional dural puncture with epidural needles, a prophylactic epidural blood patch can reduce the risk of PDPH. Other potentially efficacious maneuvers include insertion of an intrathecal catheter and avoidance of second- stage pushing. Treatment of PDPH includes the use of caffeine or an epidural blood patch. Other pharmacologic interventions (eg, theophylline, sumatriptan, adrenocorticotropic hormone) and epidural administration of saline or dextran 40 await further investigation. The evidence for these interventions is discussed in this review. Copyright © 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company