Is there a role for chemosensitivity tests in head and neck cancer?

Despite many advances in predictive testing of human malignancies, we are far from using it routinely in clinical practice. Investigating the responsiveness of solid tumors to cytostatic drugs is particularly challenging. Nevertheless, for head and neck cancer, chemosensitivity testing is an increasingly attractive option, since chemotherapy has proven to have curative potential in the therapy of head and neck cancer, in particular in combination with radiation. The significant need for predictive methods to identify patients responsive to therapy, first of all in organ preservation programs, which is an alternative to first-line surgery, had recently renewed the discussion on a possible role of chemosensitivity testing in head and neck cancer. In this review, we discuss the current state of chemosensitivity testing in head and neck cancer. Recent methodological developments, in particular elimination of photochemical artifacts and inclusion of stromal cell response studies, may soon augment the value of ex vivo chemosensitivity testing for the management of head and neck cancer.     

C-reactive protein levels: a prognostic marker for patients with head and neck cancer?

Background

Recent advances in understanding complex tumor interactions have led to the discovery of an association between inflammation and cancer, in particular for colon and lung cancer, but only a very few have dealt with oral cancer. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate the significance of preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels as a parameter for development of lymph node metastases or recurrence.

Materials and methods

In 278 patients with oral cancer, preoperative CRP levels were compared with development of recurrence and metastasis.

Results

In 27 patients from the normal CRP group, and in 21 patients from the elevated CRP group, local recurrence was observed. Concerning lymph node metastases, 37 patients were in the normal group and 9 patients in the elevated CRP group. No significant correlation could be found between elevated CRP levels and metastasis (p = 0.468) or recurrence (p = 0.137).

Conclusion

Our findings do not appear to support a correlation between preoperative CRP levels and development of recurrence or metastases. In further studies, CRP levels in precancerous lesions and in Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) positive patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) should be studied.

     

Chromosomal radiosensitivity in head and neck cancer patients: evidence for genetic predisposition?

The association between chromosomal radiosensitivity and genetic predisposition to head and neck cancer was investigated in this study. In all, 101 head and neck cancer patients and 75 healthy control individuals were included in the study. The G(2) assay was used to measure chromosomal radiosensitivity. The results demonstrated that head and neck cancer patients had a statistically higher number of radiation-induced chromatid breaks than controls, with mean values of 1.23 and 1.10 breaks per cell, respectively (P<0.001). Using the 90th percentile of the G(2) scores of the healthy individuals as a cutoff value for chromosomal radiosensitivity, 26% of the cancer patients were radiosensitive compared with 9% of the healthy controls (P=0.008). The mean number of radiation-induced chromatid breaks and the proportion of radiosensitive individuals were highest for oral cavity cancer patients (1.26 breaks per cell, 38%) and pharynx cancer patients (1.27 breaks per cell, 35%). The difference between patients and controls was most pronounced in the lower age group (相似文献   

Is home palliative care for head and neck cancer patients a possibility ?

It is likely that home palliative care for head and neck cancer patients could be treatable at general hospitals or clinics whereas combined joint efforts by medical cooperation from specialists, who are specialized in understanding of the singularity and how to cope with the symptoms, are existed.     

Is there a role for aggressive surgical cytoreduction in patients with known metastatic cancer?

Current Oncology Reports -     

Chemoradiation after surgery for high-risk head and neck cancer patients: how strong is the evidence?

Patients with locally advanced, operable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are known to be at high risk of treatment failure, ranging from local regrowth to lymphatic spread to systemic dissemination. Attacking specifically each of these patterns of failure implies the use of a multimodal approach. Throughout the past two decades the management of stages III/IV HNSCC remained a matter of debate, especially with regards to treatment intensity and sequencing. Surgery and/or radiotherapy were the mainstay of local-regional treatment in patients with locally advanced disease, but treatment outcome often remained disappointing. In the hope of improving the prognosis after radical surgery, cisplatin-based combinations have been administered before surgery, in the interval between surgery and radiotherapy, or after radiotherapy. Until very recently these combinations, at best, decreased systemic failures without having a real impact on local outcome or survival. Indeed, until the mid-1990s, most trials that had tested postoperative combinations of chemotherapy and radiotherapy did not show any significant benefit. In 2004 level I evidence was established with the publication of the results of two large-scale, independent but similar trials conducted in Europe and the U.S. Both studies demonstrated that, compared with postoperative irradiation alone, adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation was more efficacious in terms of local-regional control and disease-free survival. With the publication of these two trials the evidence demonstrating the potential value of concurrent postoperative chemoradiotherapy in high-risk operable head and neck cancer is strong; however, additional studies and comparative analysis of the selection criteria and treatment outcomes across these two trials will be needed to gain a more accurate assessment of benefit and risk levels in specific patients with operable, locally advanced disease.     

Advanced pancreatic cancer: is there a role for combination therapy?

Once thought to be a relatively untreatable disease, pancreatic cancer has recently become a focus of intense clinical research. The systemic administration of gemcitabine (Gemzar) is currently considered the standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced disease. While treatment with gemcitabine has been shown to result in both clinical benefit and prolongation of survival, objective tumor responses are relatively uncommon and median survival times remain short. Several recent efforts have therefore focused on evaluating chemotherapy regimens in which gemcitabine is combined with other cytotoxic drugs. While randomized trials have now confirmed that such combinations are associated with higher response rates, they have not yet clearly demonstrated that combination therapy results in a survival advantage. Increasingly, attention has turned to a number of novel chemotherapeutic and biologic agents that appear promising and are likely to play an important future role in the treatment of patients with this disease.     

Is there a role for genetic testing in patients with melanoma?

Autosomal dominant inheritance of mutations in the locus or the gene may confer a high risk of cutaneous melanoma development. The penetrance of mutations is influenced by UV exposure. Inherited variants in the melanocortin-1 receptor also confer increased risk of cutaneous melanoma. Features associated with increased genetic susceptibility to cutaneous melanoma include the presence of multiple affected first-degree relatives on one side of the family, multiple primary melanomas in the same individual, earlier age of onset, and the presence of multiple atypical nevi, but none of these factors reliably predicts for the presence of mutations. It is currently premature to offer predictive DNA testing for melanoma outside of defined research protocols. This is because of (1). the low likelihood of finding mutations in known melanoma susceptibility genes, even in more than 60% of melanoma-prone kindreds; (2). the broad confidence limits on current estimates of lifetime penetrance of mutations and the wide variation in this penetrance with locality; (3). a high "background" incidence of melanoma in non-mutation carriers in melanoma-prone families; (4). current uncertainties about the factors determining the functionality and phenotypic expression of the trait among carriers of these mutations (penetrance), even if found; and (5). the lack of proved efficacy of melanoma prevention and surveillance strategies, even for mutation carriers. Rather than singling out those deemed to be at high risk because of family history, all patients carrying risk factors for cutaneous melanoma should be subject to stringent programs of sun protection and skin surveillance.     

Best supportive care in non-small cell lung cancer: is there a role for radiotherapy and chemotherapy?

Best Supportive Care (BSC) is the treatment of choice when cure is not achievable with anticancer treatments and involves management of disease-related symptoms. In the palliative treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) radiation therapy has for a long time been the cornerstone of symptom management, although the best schedule is still to be defined. Chemotherapy, on the other hand, has been excluded from classical definitions of BSC and has been reserved only for selected patient populations in which a survival benefit was demonstrated using cisplatin-based regimens. We reviewed randomized trials on both palliative radiotherapy and chemotherapy in order to assess the impact of anticancer treatments on quality of life in advanced NSCLC patients. While no randomized trials compared radiation therapy with a control arm not including it, several randomized trials assessed the use of different schedules. Hypofractionated schedules seem to have comparable palliative activity when compared with the standard fractionated regimens, at least in metastatic, poor-prognosis patients. In locally advanced, inoperable NSCLC higher radiation doses administered with conventional fractionation achieve better results in terms of local control and survival. The rate of palliation of local symptoms is high, being 60-80% for chest pain and hemoptysis, while breathlessness and cough are controlled at a somewhat lower rate (50-70%). General symptoms (fatigue, anorexia, and depression) are affected in a minority of patients. Chemotherapy was compared with BSC in several randomized trials, in some of which an analysis of the quality of life was included. Results are consistent in favor of its palliative role and, when local symptom control is assessed, rates of palliation seem similar to those achieved by radiation. Benefits apply to metastatic NSCLC patients with good performance status, low body weight loss, age below 70-75. However, some studies support the use of chemotherapy also in patients with poor prognostic features. A comparison in terms of quality of life and symptom palliation between different chemotherapy regimens is the object of few trials. Both chemotherapy and radiation have an important role in the palliative treatment of advanced NSCLC patients and should be included in BSC programs. Future randomized trials should assess the best way of combining these two approaches.     

Is there a role for chemotherapy in prostate cancer?

There is evidence from randomised-controlled trials that patients with symptomatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer may experience palliative benefit from chemotherapy with mitoxantrone and prednisone. This treatment is well tolerated, even by elderly patients, although the cumulative dose of mitoxantrone is limited by cardiotoxicity. Treatment with docetaxel or paclitaxel, with or without estramustine, appears to convey higher rates of prostate-specific antigen response in phase II trials, but is more toxic. Large phase III trials comparing docetaxel with mitoxantrone have completed accrual. There is no role for chemotherapy in earlier stages of disease except in the context of a well-designed clinical trial.     

Cognitive functioning in newly presenting patients with supratentorial intracranial tumors: is there a role for inspection time?

Quantifying the extent of cognitive dysfunction in patients with intracranial tumors is important to monitor treatment effects and assess patients' needs. Inspection time, a measure of the efficiency of visual information processing, was evaluated, and its usefulness in patients with intracranial tumors was compared with that of other widely used cognitive tests. Newly presenting inpatients with supratentorial intracranial tumors (n = 118) underwent preoperative assessment using inspection time and a number of other measures of cognitive function, mood, and functional status. The brain tumor cohort was compared with patients admitted for elective spinal surgery (n = 85) and a healthy control group (n = 80). Analysis of covariance was used to compare the performance of the 3 groups. The brain tumor cohort had significantly lower inspection time scores than the spinal surgery group (P = .005) and the healthy volunteer control group (P < .001). The effect size was moderate. There was a large effect size of participant group for the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Digit Symbol-Coding, and Verbal Fluency (P = .002). The performance of patients with brain tumors was significantly worse than that of both of the control groups. Inspection time was well-tolerated by patients with intracranial tumors. However, inspection time is neither as easy to perform nor as sensitive as some other measures of cognitive function. Although its lack of any motor speed or coordination requirements, conceptual simplicity, repeatability, and relative lack of learning effect make inspection time a potentially useful tool in clinical neuro-oncology, practical considerations will limit its use.