MR angiography of aortoiliac occlusive disease: a phase III study of the safety and effectiveness of the blood-pool contrast agent MS-325

PURPOSE: To evaluate prospectively the safety and effectiveness of aortoiliac magnetic resonance (MR) angiography enhanced with MS-325 (gadofosveset trisodium) at a dose of 0.03 mmol/kg; effectiveness was defined as accuracy relative to the reference standard, conventional angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study was approved by institutional review boards of participating institutions, and required national approvals were obtained. Study protocol conformed to Good Clinical Practice guidelines, and informed patient consent was obtained. Patients with known or suspected peripheral vascular disease received 0.03 mmol/kg MS-325 for aortoiliac MR angiography. They were also examined with conventional angiography. MS-325-enhanced MR was evaluated for safety and effectiveness. Along with unenhanced two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography, it was compared with conventional angiography for presence of vascular stenosis. Student t tests were used to identify significant improvement in diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, as well as quantitative characterization of stenoses by three blinded readers. Correlations between readers of conventional angiograms were calculated and compared with MR results. RESULTS: In 174 patients, MS-325-enhanced MR angiography showed significant improvement (P < or = .001) in sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosis of clinically significant (> or =50%) stenosis, compared with unenhanced MR. For all readers, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for both quantitative and qualitative measures of significant disease increased (P < .001) for MS-325-enhanced MR compared with time-of-flight MR. All readers also expressed higher confidence in diagnosis (P < .001) and found fewer images uninterpretable with MS-325 enhancement. All measures of interpretation accuracy approached corresponding measures of correlation between readers of conventional angiograms. Incidence of severe and serious adverse events with MS-325 was low. No patients were withdrawn from study due to adverse events or abnormalities in laboratory results. There were no clinically important trends in findings at hematology, blood chemistry, urinalysis, electrocardiography, or physical examination. CONCLUSION: MR angiography with MS-325 provides significant improvement in effectiveness over unenhanced MR (and minimal and transient side effects) at a dose of 0.03 mmol/kg and was safe and effective for MR evaluation of patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease.     

Carotid MR angiography: phase II study of safety and efficacy for MS-325

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of MS-325 in patients suspected of having carotid arterial disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty carotid arteries in 26 patients were imaged with three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled-echo magnetic resonance (MR) angiography at 5 and 50 minutes after injection of MS-325. MS-325 was administered intravenously as a single dose of 0.01, 0.03, or 0.05 mmol per kilogram of body weight as determined with a dose randomization scheme for four, nine, and 13 patients, respectively. Safety, including clinical laboratory changes and electrocardiographic monitoring, was assessed until approximately 3 days after injection. Conventional contrast agent-enhanced angiography was used as the standard of reference. Independent readers blinded to the dose interpreted the MR angiographic and conventional images. Images were assessed for location and extent of carotid arterial stenosis. RESULTS: There were no severe or serious adverse events. For the determination of clinically significant stenosis (>70%) on the 5-minute images, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (P =.07, three-way comparison) were 100%, 100%, and 100%; 63%, 100%, and 88%; and 40%, 75%, and 55% at 0.01, 0.03, and 0.05 mmol/kg, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for images at 50 minutes after MS-325 administration showed the same trends as the 5-minute images. CONCLUSION: Overall accuracy for MS-325-enhanced carotid MR angiography performed during steady-state conditions of circulating contrast agent approximately 5 minutes after injection was high (88%-100%) at 0.03 and 0.01 mmol/kg. MS-325 was well tolerated at all evaluated doses.     

The OptiMARK clinical development program: summary of safety data

PURPOSE: To describe and summarize the safety data from the OptiMARK clinical development program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the 18 clinical studies comprising the clinical program, doses ranging from 0.1 to 0.7 mmol/kg were administered to healthy adult volunteers, patients with hepatic or renal impairment, and patients with confirmed or highly suspected central nervous system (CNS), liver, breast, vascular, bone, or soft tissue pathologies. A total of 2038 injections of OptiMARK, Magnevist, or placebo were administered to 1684 subjects. Safety assessments were performed at appropriate intervals during all Phase 1, 2, and 3 studies. RESULTS: Of the 1684 subjects exposed to a study drug or placebo in the clinical development program, 646 subjects experienced 1293 adverse events. Thirty-one percent of the OptiMARK injections were associated with an adverse event. In comparison, 35% of Magnevist injections and 48% of placebo injections were associated with at least one adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: OptiMARK was safe and well-tolerated with a safety profile similar to that of Magnevist.     

MR angiography with gadofosveset trisodium for peripheral vascular disease: phase II trial

PURPOSE: To evaluate the dose response and safety of gadofosveset trisodium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography compared with nonenhanced two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography and with x-ray angiography as the standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, 20-center, double-blind study, 238 men and women who had peripheral vascular disease or were suspected of having it received intravenous injection of placebo or gadofosveset (0.005, 0.01, 0.03, 0.05, or 0.07 mmol per kilogram of body weight). MR angiographic images were evaluated by three blinded readers, and x-ray angiographic images were evaluated by two readers. Hypothesis testing for the presence of a dose response was based on a linear test for trend for increase in area under the receiver operating characteristic curve as a function of dose for each reader of MR angiographic images independently. RESULTS: Gadofosveset administration resulted in a dose-dependent increase in diagnostic accuracy for detection of aortoiliac occlusive disease as reflected in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for each reader (P <.001). The plateau in effectiveness improvement began at the 0.03 mmol/kg dose. At doses of 0.03 mmol/kg and higher, gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography provided an approximate 20% increase in accuracy over nonenhanced MR angiography for diagnosis of clinically significant aortoiliac occlusive disease. Gadofosveset exhibited a good safety profile in all dose groups. Three serious adverse events were possibly or probably related to gadofosveset administration. There were no dose-related trends in severe or serious adverse events in patients receiving gadofosveset. CONCLUSION: A dose of 0.03 mmol/kg of gadofosveset was safe and effective for evaluation of aortoiliac occlusive disease with MR angiography.     

Safety profile of ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide ferumoxtran-10: phase II clinical trial data

The safety data from the phase II clinical trial of ferumoxtran-10, an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agent, are presented. One hundred and four patients with focal liver or spleen pathologies underwent ferumoxtran-10-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at doses of 0.8, 1.1, and 1.7 mg Fe/kg. Overall, 15% patients reported a total of 33 adverse events, regardless of causality. The adverse events most frequently seen were dyspnea (3.8%), chest pain (2.9%), and rash (2.9%). No serious adverse events were reported during the 48 hour observation period. There were no clinically significant effects on vital signs, physical examination, and laboratory results. Ferumoxtran-10 is a safe and well tolerated MR contrast agent.     

A multi-center, comparative, phase 3 study to determine the efficacy of gadofosveset-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of renal artery disease

PURPOSE: To determine prospectively the safety and efficacy of the blood-pool contrast agent gadofosveset trisodium in renal artery magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gadofosveset (0.03 mmol/kg) was administered to adult patients with known or suspected renal arterial disease in a multi-center phase 3 single dose study. The drug binds reversibly to albumin, prolonging the blood residence time, and allowing collection of images in the first-pass and steady-state phases. The combination of these images was compared to non-contrast MRA, using catheter X-ray angiography (XRA) as the standard of reference (SOR). All MRA images were collected at 1.5 T in one imaging session for direct comparison, and XRA within 30 days. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosing significant disease (stenosis > or =50%) were calculated for MRA using three independent blinded readers. Patient safety was monitored for 72-96 h. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients at 18 centers were enrolled and received gadofosveset; the 127 with complete efficacy data entered the primary efficacy analysis. Gadofosveset-enhanced MRA led to significant improvement (p<0.01) in sensitivity (+25%, +26%, +42%), specificity (+23%, +25%, +29%), and accuracy (+23%, +28%, +29%) over non-enhanced MRA for the three readers. The rate of uninterpretable examinations decreased from 30% to less than 2%. There were no serious adverse events, and the most common adverse events were nausea, pruritis, and headache (8% each). No significant trends in clinical chemistry parameters, nor significant changes in serum creatinine, were found following administration of gadofosveset. CONCLUSION: In patients with known or suspected renal arterial disease, multi-phase gadofosveset-enhanced MRA significantly improves sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy versus non-enhanced MRA. Gadofosveset was safe and well tolerated in this patient population.     

Phase I clinical evaluation of citrate-coated monocrystalline very small superparamagnetic iron oxide particles as a new contrast medium for magnetic resonance imaging

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of a newly developed MR contrast medium consisting of very small superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (VSOP) coated with citrate (VSOP-C184) in a clinical phase I trial. METHODS: A total of 18 healthy subjects received either VSOP-C184 (core diameter: 4 nm; total diameter: 7 +/- 0.15 nm; relaxivities in water at 0.47 T (T1) 18.7 and (T2) 30 L/(mmol*seconds)) at doses of 0.015, 0.045, or 0.075 mmol Fe/kg (n = 5 per dose) or placebo (n = 1 per dose) as intravenous injections. Physical status and vital parameters were recorded, blood samples were collected for clinical chemistry and relaxometry (0.94 T), and urinalyses were performed before and for up to 2 weeks after administration. RESULTS: No serious adverse events occurred. The most pronounced adverse events occurred in 2 subjects of the highest dose group 45-50 minutes after injection. These were a drop in blood pressure and a drop in oxygen saturation, which were considered to be possibly drug-related and rapidly resolved without medication. Otherwise, no relevant changes in vital and laboratory parameters were observed. The parameters of iron metabolism exhibited short-term, dose-related changes. The injection of VSOP-C184 decreased T1 relaxation time of blood below 100 milliseconds for 18 minutes after a dose of 0.045 mmol [corrected] Fe/kg and for 60 minutes after 0.075 mmol [corrected] Fe/kg. CONCLUSIONS: The favorable data on the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of VSOP-C184 justify further clinical phase II and III trials as a contrast medium for MRI.     

Contrast-enhanced MRI of the central nervous system: Comparison between gadodiamide injection and gadolinium-DTPA

Gadodiamide injection, a new nonionic, MRI contrast medium, was compared with the ionic agent gadolinium (Gd)-DTPA at 0.1 mmol/kg body weight in a double-blind, randomised trial in 60 patients, 30 receiving each substance, with known or suspected lesions of the central nervous system. The patients were closely questioned about adverse events. In the Gadodiamide injection group, four patients reported six adverse advents, three of which were judged to be related to the contrast medium. In the Gd-DTPA group, two patients each reported one adverse event, both of which had an uncertain relation to the contrast medium. All events were mild and no medical treatment was needed. No significant change in neurological findings, blood pressure, pulse rate or blood parameters were noted in any patient. Both contrast media were effective; no difference in overall efficacy or safety was observed.     

A multisite phase III study of the safety and efficacy of a new manganese chloride-based gastrointestinal contrast agent for MRI of the abdomen and pelvis.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a manganese chloride-based oral magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agent during a Phase III multisite clinical trial. Two hundred seventeen patients were enrolled who were already scheduled for MRI of the abdomen and/or pelvis. In this group of patients, it was postulated that the use of an oral agent would better allow discrimination of pathology from bowel. Patients with known gastrointestinal pathology including peptic ulcer disease, inflammatory bowel disease, obstruction, or perforation were excluded to minimize confounding variables that could affect the safety assessment. Of these 217 patients, 18 received up to 900 mL of placebo, and 199 patients were given up to 900 mL of a manganese chloride-based oral contrast agent, LumenHance (Bracco Diagnostics, Inc.). Safety was determined by comparing pre- and post-dose physical examinations, vital signs, and laboratory examinations and by documenting adverse events. Efficacy was assessed by unblinded site investigators and two blinded reviewers who compared pre- and post-dose T1- and T2-weighted MRI scans of the abdomen and/or pelvis. In 111 (57%) of the 195 cases evaluated for efficacy by site investigators (unblinded readers), MRI after LumenHance provided additional diagnostic information. Increased information was found by two blinded readers in 52% and 51% of patients, respectively. In 44/195 cases (23%) unblinded readers felt the additional information would have changed patient diagnosis and in 50 patients (26%), it would have changed management and/or therapy. Potential changes in patient diagnosis or management/therapy were seen by the two blinded readers in 8-20% of patients. No clinically significant post-dose laboratory changes were seen. Forty-eight patients (24%) receiving LumenHance and four patients (22%) receiving placebo experienced one or more adverse events. Gastrointestinal tract side effects were most common, seen in 29 (15%) of LumenHance patients and in 3 (17%) of the placebo patients. LumenHance is a safe and efficacious oral gastrointestinal contrast agent for MRI of the abdomen and pelvis.     

Safety and efficacy of a novel hepatobiliary MR contrast agent, Gd-DTPA-DeA: results of phase I and phase II clinical trials

PURPOSE: To assess the safety, effective dose, and efficacy of a novel hepatobiliary MR contrast agent Gd-DTPA-DeA for imaging liver tumors, from the clinical phase I and phase II trials in Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a phase I trial, 33 healthy volunteers were intravenously administered a single dose of 0.03-10 micromol/kg of Gd-DTPA-DeA. In a nationwide phase II trial, 80 patients suspected to have hepatic mass were divided into three dosing groups: 2.5, 5.0, or 7.5 micromol/kg. T1-weighted gradient echo images were obtained before and after Gd-DTPA-DeA administration at three time points. Liver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and lesion-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated at each time point. A reading committee evaluated the contrast, diagnostic, and overall efficacy using a five-point scale. RESULTS: In a phase I trial, dosages up to 10 micromol/kg were well tolerated by healthy volunteers. In a phase II trial, the contrast, diagnostic, and overall efficacy increased dose-dependently. The overall efficacy was 63.0%, 85.2%, and 88.0%, for 2.5, 5, and 7.5 micromol/kg, respectively. Liver SNR and CNR increase was greater at late phase than at early phase. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Gd-DTPA-DeA is a well-tolerated and promising contrast agent for liver MR imaging.     

Safety and efficacy of a new oral contrast agent for sonography: a phase II trial.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to study the safety and efficacy of a new orally administered sonographic contrast agent in patients with suspected upper abdominal disorders. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety-nine patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of upper abdominal disorders were enrolled in a prospective range-of-dose phase II clinical trial at six sites; sonograms of 93 patients were evaluated for efficacy. Patients underwent upper abdominal sonography before and after receiving a randomized dose of the contrast agent (200, 400, 600, 800, or 1000 ml). Safety was monitored by physical examination and laboratory testing. The primary efficacy parameter was additional information provided by the contrast agent when comparing unenhanced and contrast-enhanced sonography. RESULTS: Of the 14 adverse events in 11 patients, only five, which included mild diarrhea and nausea, were considered related to the contrast agent. In 83 of 93 patients, additional information was obtained from the contrast-enhanced images. Visualization of anatomy was improved as follows: the stomach, in 82% of patients; the duodenum, in 63% of patients; the pancreatic head and body, in 61% of patients; and the pancreatic tail, in 67% of patients. CONCLUSION: SonoRx is a safe and well-tolerated contrast agent that improves the sonographic evaluation of the upper abdomen, with significant improvement in imaging the stomach, duodenum, and pancreas.     

Female genitalia: dynamic MR imaging with use of MS-325 initial experiences evaluating female sexual response

PURPOSE: To determine whether magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with MS-325, a recently developed blood pool contrast agent, can depict sexual arousal response in healthy women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serial MR imaging of the external genitalia was performed in 12 healthy sexually functional women before and after administration of MS-325. MR images were obtained every 3 minutes during a 45-minute examination. During the examination, the subjects viewed neutral and erotic video material while they were in the magnet bore. MR image analysis at each interval consisted of vaginal wall, vaginal mucosa, and clitoris assessments; femoral vein signal intensity measurements; relative regional blood volume (rRBV) calculations; and clitoral volume measurements. Statistical analysis of the results was performed with a t test. RESULTS: On subjective questionnaires, all subjects in the test group reported being sexually aroused. MS-325-enhanced MR images showed strong contrast enhancement of the external genitalia. The rRBV in the glans clitoris of seven of 10 subjects and in the clitoral body of eight of these subjects increased significantly (P <.05) during erotic visual stimulation. All 10 subjects had a significant (P <.05) increase in clitoral size. There were no significant differences in any measures between the pre- and postmenopausal study groups. CONCLUSION: The sexual arousal response in healthy women can be monitored at serial MR imaging with MS-325. This examination holds promise for future studies of sexual arousal dysfunction in women.     

Safety of gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance): Summary of findings from clinical studies and postmarketing surveillance

OBJECTIVES: Prospective studies and retrospective analyses were undertaken to evaluate the clinical safety of gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) and to assess tolerability in special populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 3092 subjects received MultiHance in 79 clinical trials. Data from comparisons with other contrast agents and studies in children, subjects with hepatic or renal impairment, or subjects with coronary artery disease were reviewed. Postmarketing safety surveillance data after more than 1.5 million applications were also evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 413 of 2982 (14%) adult subjects receiving MultiHance reported at least one adverse event (AE) definitely or potentially related to MultiHance, an incidence that was similar to that observed with placebo (21/127, 17%) or active controls (59/723, 8%). In crossover studies, 23 of 287 (8%) subjects receiving MultiHance experienced AE compared with 25 of 295 (9%) receiving gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist). No increased AE rate was observed in children and no worsening of renal or liver function was observed in subjects with hepatic or renal impairment. No detrimental effect on cardiac electrophysiology could be observed from a retrospective analysis of ECG parameters in more than 1000 patients and healthy volunteers. The AE reporting rate from postmarketing safety surveillance of MultiHance was 0.05%. Serious AEs were rarely reported and included dyspnea, nausea, urticaria, hypotension, and anaphylactoid reactions. CONCLUSIONS: MultiHance appears to be well tolerated in adults and children and in subjects with impaired liver or kidney function or coronary artery disease. In controlled trials, MultiHance demonstrated a similar safety profile to that of Magnevist.     

Incidence of adverse events after I.V injection of MR contrast agents in a Chinese population. A comparison between gadopentetate and gadodiamide

PURPOSE: To study the incidence of adverse events after i.v. injection of MR contrast agents in a Chinese population. A comparison was made between an ionic contrast agent (dimeglumine gadopentetate, Magnevist) and a non-ionic contrast agent (gadodiamide, Omniscan). MATERIAL AND METHODS: During a 24-month period, 2,049 Chinese patients who randomly received an i.v. bolus injection of either Magnevist or Omniscan were investigated. All patients were questioned for the presence of any generalized or localized adverse reaction on the following day after the MR examination according to a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: Three hundred and nine out of 2,049 patients (15%) reported an adverse event. There was a higher incidence of adverse events in patients receiving Magnevist as compared to those receiving Omniscan injection. All reported adverse events were clinically mild and required neither treatment nor hospitalization. CONCLUSION: There was a higher incidence of adverse reaction in patients receiving Magnevist than in those receiving Omniscan.     

Phase I clinical evaluation of a new iron oxide MR contrast agent

The safety and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging potential of BMS 180549, a new superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agent, were evaluated in a phase I, open-label, placebo-controlled study involving 41 healthy subjects. No clinically significant postdose changes in physical examination findings, vital signs, or electrocardiogram results were reported for any of the subjects evaluated. No clinically significant changes in clinical laboratory values were noted by the investigators. Fourteen adverse events considered not serious and considered possibly or definitely related to the drug were reported, three of which required minor treatment. Relaxation time measurements in plasma samples showed a strong, dose-dependent, and persistent decrease in T1 and T2 values. Significant changes in MR signal intensity of the blood pool and wellperfused organs (liver and spleen) were noted on both T1- and T2-weighted images. Changes in signal intensity of cervical lymph nodes were also observed at the higher doses and late postdose imaging times.     

Functional brain imaging using a long intravenous half-life gadolinium-based contrast agent

PURPOSE: We describe a technique for functional MR imaging (fMRI) with high spatial and temporal resolution using a long intravascular half-life gadolinium-based contrast agent, MS-325. METHODS: All fMRI measurements used a rat model of sensory cortex activation with forepaw electrical stimulation under alpha-chloralose anesthesia. Standard blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI measurement was initially performed. MS-325 was then intravenously administered and a MS-325 fMRI measurement was performed by using a 3D gradient-echo sequence. RESULTS: We found that a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg MS-325 produced adequate signal intensity changes in rat sensory cortex to demonstrate activations. Using a boxcar stimulation pattern with a standard correlation analysis, the locations of the most significantly activated voxels (ie, highest Z score) in the MS-325 and BOLD fMRI measurements were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: MS-325 fMRI has the advantage of using a T1-weighted sequence, rather than the highly T2*-weighted sequences used in other common fMRI techniques. This could reduce the susceptibility artifacts associated with fMRI.     

Contrast-enhanced MRA of the renal and aorto-iliac-femoral arteries: Comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadofosveset trisodium

Rationale and objectives

Dedicated contrast agents are now available for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA). This study retrospectively compares the safety and diagnostic performance data from Phase III regulatory trials performed to evaluate gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance^®) and gadofosveset trisodium (Vasovist^®) for renal and peripheral CE-MRA.

Materials and methods

Similar examination and blinded assessment methodology was utilized in all studies to determine the safety and diagnostic performance of the agents for detection of significant (>50%) steno-occlusive disease. Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) was used as the standard of truth. Diagnostic performance data (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values [PVs], and likelihood ratios [LRs]) were compared (Chi-square test).

Results

CE-MRA with gadobenate dimeglumine was more specific (92.4% vs. 80.5%, p < 0.0001) and accurate (83.6% vs. 77.1%, p = 0.022) than CE-MRA with gadofosveset in the detection of significant renal artery stenosis. The average sensitivity was higher for gadofosveset (74.4% vs. 67.3%, p = 0.011) in peripheral vessels although gadobenate dimeglumine was more specific (93.0% vs. 88.2%, p < 0.0001) with no difference in accuracy (86.6% vs. 86.3%, p = 0.66). PPVs were higher (p < 0.0001) for gadobenate dimeglumine in both vascular territories. Pre- to post-test shifts in the probability of detecting significant disease were greater after gadobenate dimeglumine. Adverse events in the renal and peripheral studies were reported by 9.2% and 7.7% of patients after gadobenate dimeglumine compared with 30.3% and 22.1% of patients after gadofosveset.

Conclusion

The diagnostic performance of CE-MRA for the detection of significant steno-occlusive disease is similar with gadofosveset and gadobenate dimeglumine although the rate of adverse events appears higher with gadofosveset.     

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of OptiMARK (gadoversetamide injection) compared with Magnevist (gadopentetate dimeglumine) in patients with liver pathology: results of a Phase III clinical trial

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OptiMARK (gadoversetamide injection) compared with Magnevist (gadopentetate dimeglumine) in hepatic MRI of patients with suspected liver pathology. A Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study was performed in adults with suspected liver pathology. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography within 3 weeks prior to magnetic resonance scanning. Ninety-nine patients received OptiMARK, and 94 patients received Magnevist at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg. Precontrast T1- and T2-weighted spin-echo imaging and T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging were performed, followed by T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging at 15-20 seconds, 1 minute, and 5 minutes after intravenous contrast injection. Three primary efficacy endpoints (confidence in lesion diagnosis, level of conspicuity, and lesion border delineation) were evaluated on the precontrast image set and compared with the pre plus postcontrast image set. Vital signs, physical examination, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and laboratory parameters (chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis) were measured at various time points. Adverse events were recorded. The study design and statistical analyses were chosen to demonstrate presumed equivalence of OptiMARK and Magnevist. There were no statistically significant differences in efficacy between OptiMARK and Magnevist as assessed by either blinded readers or the on-site principal investigators. No serious or unexpected adverse events were noted. Of the 193 patients receiving contrast media, 82 experienced a total of 154 adverse events. Thirty-three (21.4%) of these 154 adverse events were felt by the on-site investigators to be probably related to either study agent: 15 events in 9 patients in the OptiMARK group, and 18 events in 13 patients in the Magnevist group. Headache was the most common adverse event, occurring in 10.1% of the OptiMARK patients and 12.8% of the Magnevist patients. No clinically relevant trends were observed in any laboratory parameter or ECG findings in either treatment group. The results demonstrate the safety, efficacy, and equivalence of OptiMARK and Magnevist at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg in hepatic magnetic resonance imaging of patients with suspected liver pathology.     

Clinical safety of iotrolan 280: the Japanese experience

Iortrolan is a new non ionic, dimeric, iodinated X-ray contrast agent that is isotonic with body fluids. In Japan iotrolan (280 mg iodin/ml) was evaluated in well controlled multi-center trials to compare its efficacy, safety and utility with that of iopamidol (300 mg iodine/ml), considered to be the standard non-ionic monomeric X-ray contrast agent in this country. Safety data from four phase III studies are presented. Two studies involved intra-arterial injection (cerebral and peripheral arteriography) and two were intravenous (computed tomography and urography). Iotrolan 280 was administered to 333 patients and 337 patients received iopamidol 300. The safety evaluation of iotrolan 280 was by assessment of adverse events, pain and heat sensation following intra-arterial injection, as well as clinical laboratory tests and an overall safety rating by the investigator. The results showed that there was a significant reduction in pain and heat sensation with iotrolan 280. Fewer adverse events were seen with iotrolan 280 compared with iopamidol 300, but this difference was not signicant in this limited patient population. Clinical laboratory tests showed no clinically relevant change attributed to contrast agent injection not any significant difference between the two agents. The overall safety rating, based on all of the above results, was “safe” in 94.6% of patients receiving iotrolan 280 and 92.0% of patients receiving iopamidol 300, suggesting that iotrolan 280 was at least as safe for intra-arterial and intravenous use as iopamidol 300.     

Safety of gadodiamide injection in two different age groups

A meta-analyses was performed to evaluate the safety of gadodiamide injection (OMNISCAN®) for magnetic resonance imaging in two different age groups (< 65 years; ≥ 65 years). Data on vital signs, clinical laboratory parameters, and subjectively experienced adverse events were reviewed for 734 patients included in 19 European Phase II and III trials with gadodiamide injection (0.1 mmol/kg body weight or 0.3 mmol/kg body weight) used in magnetic resonance imaging. One hundred sixty-four patients were 65 years of age or older. No statistically significant differences were shown between this population and the population younger than 65 years of age with respect to vital signs or clinical laboratory parameters. A total of 48 adverse events, discomfort excluded, were reported, with no significant difference in frequency between the two age groups. Injection-associated discomfort was significantly (P=.0025) more frequent in the younger (9.2%) than in the older group (2.5%). Gadodiamide injection is in conclusion a safe contrast medium in older as well as in younger patients.