Are COX-2 inhibitors preferable to non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with risk of cardiovascular events taking low-dose aspirin?

Cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitors and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with increased risk of acute cardiovascular events. Only aspirin offers primary and secondary cardiovascular prophylaxis, but trials have not answered directly whether low-dose aspirin is cardioprotective with COX-2 inhibitors. A large inception cohort study showed that concomitant use of aspirin reduced risk of cardiovascular events when given with rofecoxib, celecoxib, sulindac, meloxicam, and indometacin but not when given with ibuprofen. In large trials assessing gastrointestinal safety, there were fewer gastrointestinal events in patients using both COX-2 inhibitors and aspirin than in those using non-selective NSAIDs and aspirin; significantly fewer uncomplicated upper gastrointestinal events took place in the MEDAL trial. Analysis of VIGOR and two capsule endoscopy studies showed significantly less distal gastrointestinal blood loss with COX-2 inhibitors than with non-selective NSAIDs. Endoscopy trials showed that low-dose aspirin does not diminish the gastrointestinal benefits of COX-2 inibitors over non-selective NSAIDs. In an elderly epidemiological cohort receiving aspirin, both celecoxib and rofecoxib reduced risk of admission for gastrointestinal events. Comparison of the cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risks is difficult: likelihood and severity of cardiovascular events differ between individuals, agents, and exposure. Mortality associated with gastrointestinal events is less frequent than with cardiovascular events, but asymptomatic ulcers can result in severe complications. Data support the conclusion that COX-2 inhibitors are preferable to non-selective NSAIDs in patients with chronic pain and cardiovascular risk needing low-dose aspirin, but relative risks and benefits should be assessed individually for each patient.     

Are COX-2 inhibitors preferable to non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with risk of cardiovascular events taking low-dose aspirin?

Cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitors and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with increased risk of acute cardiovascular events. Only aspirin offers primary and secondary cardiovascular prophylaxis, but trials have not answered directly whether low-dose aspirin is cardioprotective with COX-2 inhibitors. A large inception cohort study showed that concomitant use of aspirin reduced risk of cardiovascular events when given with rofecoxib, celecoxib, sulindac, meloxicam, and indometacin but not when given with ibuprofen. In large trials assessing gastrointestinal safety, there were fewer gastrointestinal events in patients using both COX-2 inhibitors and aspirin than in those using non-selective NSAIDs and aspirin; significantly fewer uncomplicated upper gastrointestinal events took place in the MEDAL trial. Analysis of VIGOR and two capsule endoscopy studies showed significantly less distal gastrointestinal blood loss with COX-2 inhibitors than with non-selective NSAIDs. Endoscopy trials showed that low-dose aspirin does not diminish the gastrointestinal benefits of COX-2 inibitors over non-selective NSAIDs. In an elderly epidemiological cohort receiving aspirin, both celecoxib and rofecoxib reduced risk of admission for gastrointestinal events. Comparison of the cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risks is difficult: likelihood and severity of cardiovascular events differ between individuals, agents, and exposure. Mortality associated with gastrointestinal events is less frequent than with cardiovascular events, but asymptomatic ulcers can result in severe complications. Data support the conclusion that COX-2 inhibitors are preferable to non-selective NSAIDs in patients with chronic pain and cardiovascular risk needing low-dose aspirin, but relative risks and benefits should be assessed individually for each patient.     

Selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors: similarities and differences

The enzyme cyclooxygenase (COX) was shown to exist as two distinct isoforms about a decade ago. COX-1 is constitutively expressed as a 'housekeeping' enzyme in nearly all tissues, and mediates physiological responses (e.g. cytoprotection of the stomach, and platelet aggregation). On the other hand, COX-2, expressed by cells involved in inflammation (e.g. macrophages, monocytes, synoviocytes), has emerged as the isoform that is primarily responsible for the synthesis of prostanoids involved in acute and chronic inflammatory states. Consequently, the hypothesis that selective inhibition of COX-2 might have therapeutic actions similar to those of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, but without causing gastrointestinal side effects, was the rationale for the development of selective inhibitors of the COX-2 isoenzyme. Selective COX-2 inhibitors currently used in the clinic are the sulphonamides celecoxib and valdecoxib (parecoxib is a prodrug of valdecoxib), as well as the methylsulphones rofecoxib and etoricoxib. Furthermore, the phenylacetic acid derivative lumiracoxib has gained permission recently to be marketed in Europe. This review discusses the clinically relevant similarities and differences of these substances, with particular emphasis on their diverse pharmacokinetic characteristics.     

Gastro-duodenal protection in an era of cyclo-oxygenase-2-selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective and necessary for the relief of pain and inflammation in patients with arthritis. NSAIDs are however also associated with an increased risk for ulceration in the stomach and in the duodenum, and many NSAID users experience bothersome dyspeptic symptoms during continued NSAID therapy. PPIs like omeprazole, have been shown to heal and to prevent ulcers and dyspeptic symptoms during continued NSAID therapy, and during continued NSAID therapy the prostaglandin analogue, misoprostol, has been shown to reduce the risk for ulcer complications. The COX-2 selective NSAID, rofecoxib, is in comparison with naproxen, a non-selective NSAID, associated with fewer clinically important upper gastrointestinal events. The incidence of myocardial infarctions seems, however, to be lower with naproxen than with rofecoxib, and this is expected to lead to low-dose aspirin use in rofecoxib users at risk for cardiovascular events. Co-administration of the COX-2 selective NSAID, celecoxib, and low-dose aspirin, is associated with the same risk for upper gastrointestinal ulcer complications alone and combined with symptomatic ulcers, as the non-selective NSAIDs, ibuprofen and diclofenac. A proton pump inhibitor (PPI) should be used for healing of NSAID-associated ulcers, and a PPI or misoprostol should be considered for prevention of ulceration in non-selective NSAID users at risk for ulceration. The experience with COX-2 selective NSAIDs is still limited, and it remains to be studied whether subpopulations of COX-2 selective NSAID users will benefit from gastro-duodenal protection.     

NSAID-induced gastric damage in rats: requirement for inhibition of both cyclooxygenase 1 and 2

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors produce less gastric damage than conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), suggesting that NSAIDs cause damage by inhibiting COX-1. We tested this hypothesis in rats by using a selective COX-1 inhibitor (SC-560). METHODS: The effects of SC-560, celecoxib (selective COX-2 inhibitor), or a combination of both inhibitors on gastric damage and prostaglandin synthesis were determined. Selectivity of the drugs for COX-1 vs. COX-2 was assessed in the carrageenan-airpouch model. A COX-1-preferential inhibitor, ketorolac, was also evaluated. The effects of these inhibitors on leukocyte adherence to vascular endothelium and on gastric blood flow were assessed. RESULTS: SC-560 markedly reduced gastric prostaglandin synthesis and platelet COX-1 activity, but spared COX-2 and did not cause gastric damage. Celecoxib did not affect gastric prostaglandin E(2) synthesis and did not cause gastric damage. However, the combination of SC-560 and celecoxib invariably caused hemorrhagic erosion formation, comparable to that seen with indomethacin. Ketorolac caused damage only at doses that inhibited both COX isoforms, or when given with a COX-2 inhibitor. Celecoxib, but not SC-560, significantly increased leukocyte adherence, whereas SC-560, but not celecoxib, reduced gastric blood flow. CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of both COX-1 and COX-2 is required for NSAID-induced gastric injury in the rat.     

COX-2-Specific Inhibitors – the Emergence of a New Class of Analgesic and Anti-inflammatory Drugs

The prostaglandin series of bioactive compounds is formed by the interaction of two distinct but related enzymes, cyclo-oxygenase-1 (COX-1) and cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2). COX-1 is a constitutive form which is present mainly in the gastric mucosa, kidney and platelets. COX-2 is mainly an inducible form, although also to some extent present constitutively in the CNS, the juxtaglomerular apparatus of the kidney and in the placenta during late gestation. Both isoforms contribute to the inflammatory process, but COX-2 is of considerable therapeutic interest as it is induced, resulting in an enhanced formation of prostaglandins, during acute as well as chronic inflammation. Conventional NSAIDs inhibit both isoforms to a similar extent and in an approximately equal dose and concentration range. The two recently developed and clinically available selective COX-2 inhibitors, celecoxib and rofecoxib, are about 100–1000 times more selective on the COX-2 than on the COX-1 isoform. In Europe rofecoxib is today indicated for the symptoms and signs of osteoarthritis, whereas celecoxib is indicated for both osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. The major clinical interest of these drugs has been related to the lower incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding which, with the conventional COX-1/COX-2 agents has been a source of hospitalisation, disablement and death, especially in the elderly. Clinical trials have convincingly demonstrated that celecoxib and rofecoxib in clinical use induce very few gastrointestinal complications compared to conventional and non-selective NSAIDs. However, the well known contraindications for NSAIDs, such as late pregnancy, aspirin-induced asthma, congestive heart failure and renal dysfunction, will so far apply also to the COX-2 inhibitors. Compared to the traditional and non-selective NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors may provide an insight into additional therapeutic areas, such as gastrointestinal cancer and dementia, where the potential relevance to COX-2 mechanisms are currently being explored and clinical trials being performed. With the rapid clinical acceptance of celecoxib and rofecoxib, knowledge about their clinical usefulness in various inflammatory disease states and pain disorders is increasing. For the many patients suffering from such conditions, the selective COX-2 inhibitors are likely to become a significant addition to the therapeutic arsenal of analgesic and anti-inflammatory drugs. Received: 15 December 1999 / Accepted: 4 April 2000     

COX-2 inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis

The selective cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitors have emerged as an important option in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Rofecoxib and celecoxib, the selective COX-2 inhibitors currently available, have shown efficacy in reducing symptoms of RA comparable with that of traditional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The primary advantage of selective COX-2 inhibitors relates to reduced gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Gastroduodenal ulcers detected by endoscopy are markedly diminished in patients receiving selective COX-2 inhibitors versus those receiving NSAIDs. Moreover, unpublished data indicate that the risk of symptomatic and complicated ulcers is reduced by approximately half in patients prescribed rofecoxib or celecoxib. Despite these encouraging findings, selective COX-2 inhibitors have the potential for important adverse events such as impaired renal function, hypertension, and edema. Furthermore, clinicians must balance the competing demands of reducing GI risk while managing the increasing costs associated with selective COX-2 inhibitor use.     

Gastrointestinal Damage Induced by Celecoxib and Rofecoxib in Rats

Five experimental models were developed in different groups of Wistar rats (N = 15) to study selective COX-2-inhibitor NSAIDs such as celecoxib and rofecoxib, as follows: (1) dose-dependent oral Celecoxib and Rofecoxib for 5 days, and 24 hr after oral indomethacin; (2) Same as 1 but subcutaneously; (3) gastric ulcer induced by glacial acetic acid; (4) duodenal ulcer induced by cysteamine; and (5) stress by immobilization and immersion in water at 15°C for 6 hr. Celecoxib and Rofecoxib, either orally or subcutaneously, did not produce necrotic lesions in healthy gastrointestinal mucosa (0%), showing normal histology. In contrast, previously indomethacin-induced lesions were aggravated (90%, P < 0.001). Total necrosis in the small intestine as well as increased ulcers and perforation of gastric and duodenal ulcers induced by acetic acid and cysteamine were observed. There was also aggravation of the necrotic gastric area in stress (60–90%, P < 0.05). Celecoxib and rofecoxib showed neutrophilia (5000/mm³) similar to that with indomethacin. In contrast, there was no leukocyte infiltration in the gastric mucosa; thus, we can consider it a selective COX-2 NSAID. In conclusion, celecoxib and rofecoxib at doses causing COX-2 but not COX-1 inhibition did not produce toxic lesions in healthy gastrointestinal mucosa, yielding a broad therapeutic margin. In contrast, when administered in altered gastrointestinal mucosa, they aggravated and complicated gastric ulcers as well as necrosis in the small intestine, consequently restricting their clinical use.     

Healing of duodenal ulcers is not impaired by indomethacin or rofecoxib,the selective COX-2 inhibitor,in rats

BACKGROUND/AIM: Studies have demonstrated an important role for endogenous PG and NO in the healing of chronic gastric ulcers. We investigated the effects of COX and NOS inhibitors on the healing of duodenal ulcers, in comparison with gastric ulcers, in rats. METHODS: Gastric and duodenal ulcers were induced by serosal application of acetic acid (0.1 ml of 100% acetic acid) for 60 and 20 s, respectively. Indomethacin (a nonselective COX inhibitor) or rofecoxib (a selective COX-2 inhibitor) was given p.o. once daily for 14 days from 3 days after ulcer induction, while N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME: a nonselective NOS inhibitor) or aminoguanidine (a relatively selective iNOS inhibitor) was given s.c. twice daily during this period. RESULTS: Both gastric and duodenal ulcers induced by acetic acid healed spontaneously within 17 days to a minimal size. Daily administration of indomethacin or rofecoxib significantly delayed the healing of gastric but not duodenal ulcers. In contrast, the healing of both gastric and duodenal ulcers was delayed by repeated administration of either L-NAME or aminoguanidine. Ulceration markedly increased the PGE(2) content of the ulcerated mucosa in both the stomach and duodenum, and the increased PG biosynthetic response was inhibited by either indomethacin or rofecoxib in both tissues. The expression of both COX-2 and iNOS mRNAs was upregulated in the ulcerated mucosa of the stomach and duodenum. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that COX-2/PG is actively involved in the healing of gastric but not duodenal ulcers, although the mRNA for COX-2 is expressed in the duodenal mucosa after ulceration, as potently as in the gastric mucosa. In contrast, NO produced by both cNOS and iNOS plays a role in the healing of both gastric and duodenal ulcers.     

Selective inhibitors of type 2 cyclooxygenase: less renal effects than the classical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents

Prostaglandins play an important role in the regulation of renal hemodynamics and sodium excretion. Thus, the administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) induces a renal vasoconstriction and sodium and potassium retention. In some high risk patients, this may lead to acute renal failure. The anti-inflammatory and renal effects of conventional NSAIDs are mediated by the non-selective inhibition of two cyclo-oxygenases, COX-1 and COX-2. Recently, highly selective COX-2 inhibitors have been developed such as celecoxib (Celebrex) and rofecoxib (Vioxx). These drugs were designed to preserve the analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties of NSAIDs while reducing their gastro-intestinal and renal side effects. Selective COX-2 inhibitors have indeed less gastro-intestinal side-effects. However, their renal profile is comparable to that of non-selective inhibitors as they induce a decrease in glomerular filtration rate and a sodium and potassium retention. Thus, despite the good gastro-intestinal safety profile of selective COX-2, one should be careful with the use of these agents in high risk patients as they may induce similar renal complications as non-selective NSAIDs.     

Gastrointestinal damage induced by celecoxib and rofecoxib in rats

Five experimental models were carried out in different groups of Wistar rats (n = 15) in order to study selective (cyclo-oxygenase) COX-2 non-steroid antiinflammatory inhibitors, such as celecoxib and rofecoxib, as follows: 1) Dose-dependent oral celecoxib and rofecoxib for 5 days, and 24 hours after oral indomethacin. 2) Same as 1, but subcutaneously. 3) Gastric ulcer induced by means of glacial acetic acid. 4) Duodenal ulcer induced by means of cysteamine. 5) Stress due to being kept under restraint and immersion in water at 15 degrees C for 6 hours. Celecoxib and rofecoxib, either orally or subcutaneously, did not produce necrotic injuries in healthy gastrointestinal mucosa (0%), showing normal histology. On the other hand, the injuries previously induced by indomethacin worsened (90%, p < 0.001). Total necrosis of small intestine as well as increased ulcer and perforation of gastric and duodenal ulcers induced by acetic acid and cysteamine were observed. There was also worsening of gastric necrotic area with stress (60-90%, p < 0.05). Celecoxib and rofecoxib showed neutrophilia (5,000/mm3) similar to that presented by indomethacin, but there was no leukocyte infiltration in the gastric mucosa; thus we can consider it a COX-2 selective NSAID (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug). CONCLUSION: Dose-dependent administration of celecoxib and rofecoxib as COX-2 inhibitors and non-COX-1 inhibitors, respectively, did not produce toxic injuries on healthy gastrointestinal mucosa, thus providing a broad therapeutic spectre. On the other hand, when administered in presence of altered gastrointestinal mucosa, they worsened and complicated gastric ulcers, and also induced necrosis in the small intestine, thereby restricting their clinical use.     

More pronounced inhibition of cyclooxygenase 2, increase in blood pressure, and reduction of heart rate by treatment with diclofenac compared with celecoxib and rofecoxib

OBJECTIVE: Recent findings suggest that permanent blockade of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) is one factor contributing to the cardiovascular side effects of selective COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs) and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The present study compared the extent and time course of COX-2 inhibition and the effects on cardiovascular parameters (changes in blood pressure and heart rate) between various antirheumatic doses of diclofenac, celecoxib, and rofecoxib in healthy elderly volunteers. METHODS: A randomized, parallel-group study was conducted in volunteers receiving 75 mg diclofenac twice daily, 200 mg celecoxib twice daily, or 25 mg rofecoxib once daily for 8 days. Blood samples were obtained predose and at specified time points postdose, on days 1 and 8, for assay of drug plasma concentrations and COX-2 inhibition. Lipopolysaccharide-induced prostaglandin E(2) synthesis was measured ex vivo as an index of COX-2 activity in human whole blood. RESULTS: COX-2 inhibition was significantly less pronounced after treatment with celecoxib and rofecoxib than with diclofenac. Maximal inhibitions after a single dose and at steady state, respectively, were as follows: 99% and 99% with diclofenac, 70% and 81% with celecoxib, and 56% and 72% with rofecoxib. At steady state, only diclofenac caused virtually complete COX-2 inhibition over the whole dose interval, and this corresponded to the highest increase in systolic blood pressure and greatest reduction in heart rate. CONCLUSION: Diclofenac elicited the most pronounced COX-2 inhibition, blood pressure elevation, and suppression of heart rate. It is assumed that the extent and time course of intravascular COX-2 inhibition may determine the differential profile of cardiovascular side effects associated with NSAIDs and coxibs, but this has to be proven in future studies.     

Pathogenesis of NSAID-induced gastric damage: importance of cyclooxygenase inhibition and gastric hypermotility

This article reviews the pathogenic mechanism of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced gastric damage, focusing on the relation between cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition and various functional events. NSAIDs, such as indomethacin, at a dose that inhibits prostaglandin (PG) production, enhance gastric motility, resulting in an increase in mucosal permeability, neutrophil infiltration and oxyradical production, and eventually producing gastric lesions. These lesions are prevented by pretreatment with PGE₂ and antisecretory drugs, and also via an atropine-sensitive mechanism, not related to antisecretory action. Although neither rofecoxib (a selective COX-2 inhibitor) nor SC-560 (a selective COX-1 inhibitor) alone damages the stomach, the combined administration of these drugs provokes gastric lesions. SC-560, but not rofecoxib, decreases prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) production and causes gastric hypermotility and an increase in mucosal permeability. COX-2 mRNA is expressed in the stomach after administration of indomethacin and SC-560 but not rofecoxib. The up-regulation of indomethacin-induced COX-2 expression is prevented by atropine at a dose that inhibits gastric hypermotility. In addition, selective COX-2 inhibitors have deleterious influences on the stomach when COX-2 is overexpressed under various conditions, including adrenalectomy, arthritis, and Helicobacter pylori-infection. In summary, gastric hypermotility plays a primary role in the pathogenesis of NSAID-induced gastric damage, and the response, causally related with PG deficiency due to COX-1 inhibition, occurs prior to other pathogenic events such as increased mucosal permeability; and the ulcerogenic properties of NSAIDs require the inhibition of both COX-1 and COX-2, the inhibition of COX-1 upregulates COX-2 expression in association with gastric hypermotility, and PGs produced by COX-2 counteract the deleterious effect of COX-1 inhibition.     

Drug insight: cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors--a critical appraisal

Following the withdrawal of rofecoxib and valdecoxib, the discussion concerning selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors was often characterized more by emotions than scientific evidence. In fact, the original rationale of these substances is still valid, in that selective COX2 inhibitors cause significantly fewer severe side effects in the gastrointestinal tract than traditional NSAIDs. Off-label long-term use of COX2 inhibitors in patients with a history of colorectal adenomas in well-designed, placebo-controlled trials showed that treatment with these agents is associated with an increased rate of cardiovascular adverse effects. Other studies have shown that both COX2 inhibitors and NSAIDs are associated with a similar cardiovascular risk, suggesting that there is presently no rationale for a further differentiation of these groups of drugs in terms of cardiovascular toxicity. Referring to the current debate, potential mechanisms underlying cardiovascular adverse effects associated with the long-term use of COX2 inhibitors and NSAIDs are discussed. Moreover, this Review summarizes the pharmacology of COX2 inhibitors with emphasis on their different pharmacokinetic characteristics.     

Effects of Celecoxib on Acid-Challenged Gastric Mucosa of Rats: Comparison with Metamizol and Piroxicam

Selective COX-2 inhibitors have been shown to produce fewer gastrointestinal adverse reactions than classical NSAIDs. Nevertheless, these new agents may worsen and delay the healing of experimentally induced gastric ulcers in animals. In this study, we compared the effects of a selective COX-2 inhibitor (celecoxib), a preferential COX-1 inhibitor (piroxicam), and a nonnarcotic analgesic (metamizol) on normal gastric mucosa of rats and, on the other hand, in a setting of preexisting acute gastric lesions induced by 0.6 N hydrochloric acid. Under normal conditions, only piroxicam produced appreciable gastric lesions. However, after acid challenge the three assayed drugs induced significant macroscopic and microscopic damage. Myeloperoxidase activity as an index of neutrophil infiltration was elevated with celecoxib and piroxicam on normal gastric mucosa. On inflamed mucosa, celecoxib augmented enzymatic activity at the lower dose, which was parallelled by an increase in the interleukin 1beta level. Acid instillaton produced a significant rise in PGE2 content at 7 hr. Drug treatment after acid challenge decreased prostaglandin values in all cases, although to a lesser extent than after single drug dose administration. COX-2 mRNA expression was visible 1 hr after acid application, whereas COX-2 protein could only be detected at 7 hr. Piroxicam increased both expression levels. All NSAIDs enhanced transforming growth factor alpha and epidermal growth factor receptor immunoreactivity around the acid-induced lesions. It is concluded that selective COX-2 inhibitors, like conventional NSAIDs, impair the healing of gastric damage, and therefore special attention should be paid in patients with gastric pathologies.     

Motion--Cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are as safe as placebo for the stomach: arguments against the motion.

Cyclo-oxygenase (COX) exists in two isoforms, COX-1 and COX-2, that direct the synthesis of prostaglandins, prostacyclin and thromboxane. Traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit both isoenzymes, resulting in damage to the mucosa of the stomach and duodenum, but also in cardioprotection. Selective COX-2 inhibitors are less likely to damage the upper gastrointestinal tract, as has been shown by large, randomized, controlled trials. Specifically, the newer agents are superior to ibuprofen and naproxen in this regard, but celecoxib and diclofenac were not significantly different in patients who were not also taking low-dose acetylsalicylic acid. These studies did not include a placebo arm, however, and controlled comparisons of COX-2 inhibitors with placebo have not enlisted enough subjects to demonstrate conclusively that they are equally safe. Selectivity for the COX-2 isoform affords protection against upper gastrointestinal toxicity possibly at the expense of the cardioprotective effect of traditional NSAIDs. This might explain the higher rate of nonfatal myocardial infarction in patients who are given rofecoxib compared with naproxen. A traditional NSAID, combined with either misoprostol or a proton pump inhibitor, is still a suitable alternative to selective COX-2 inhibitors for the treatment of arthritis.     

COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitors

By inhibiting prostaglandin synthesis, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) cause mucosal damage, ulceration and ulcer complication throughout the gastrointestinal tract. The recognition that there are two cyclo-oxygenase enzymes, one predominating at sites of inflammation (COX-2) and one constitutively expressed in the gastrointestinal tract (COX-1), has led to the important therapeutic development of COX-2 inhibitors. COX-2 is phylogenetically more primitive that COX-1 and, while very similar, has critical differences, particularly the existence of a small pocket half way down the active enzyme site. A number of drugs achieve selectivity by binding to this pocket, including presumptively rofecoxib and celecoxib. Others, such as meloxicam, may inhibit COX-2 by different mechanisms.Truly selective COX-2 inhibitors have been shown to have no effect on gastric mucosal prostaglandin synthesis, to cause no acute injury, and no chronic ulceration compared to placebo. Rofecoxib has, in a prospective systematic evaluation involving 8076 patients, been shown to reduce clinically significant ulcers, ulcer complications and gastrointestinal bleeding significantly compared to naproxen. Outcomes data for celecoxib have also been published although differences from the combined comparator agents (diclofenac and ibuprofen) did not reach statistical significance.Use of aspirin in the class study has shown that the benefits of COX-2 inhibitors may be reduced by aspirin use. The VIGOR study has raised the possibility that some NSAIDs, particularly naproxen, may protect against vascular disease compared to COX-2 inhibitors (or placebo).     

Coxibs interfere with the action of aspirin by binding tightly to one monomer of cyclooxygenase-1

Pain associated with inflammation involves prostaglandins synthesized from arachidonic acid (AA) through cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) pathways while thromboxane A₂ formed by platelets from AA via cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) mediates thrombosis. COX-1 and COX-2 are both targets of nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (nsNSAIDs) including aspirin whereas COX-2 activity is preferentially blocked by COX-2 inhibitors called coxibs. COXs are homodimers composed of identical subunits, but we have shown that only one subunit is active at a time during catalysis; moreover, many nsNSAIDS bind to a single subunit of a COX dimer to inhibit the COX activity of the entire dimer. Here, we report the surprising observation that celecoxib and other coxibs bind tightly to a subunit of COX-1. Although celecoxib binding to one monomer of COX-1 does not affect the normal catalytic processing of AA by the second, partner subunit, celecoxib does interfere with the inhibition of COX-1 by aspirin in vitro. X-ray crystallographic results obtained with a celecoxib/COX-1 complex show how celecoxib can bind to one of the two available COX sites of the COX-1 dimer. Finally, we find that administration of celecoxib to dogs interferes with the ability of a low dose of aspirin to inhibit AA-induced ex vivo platelet aggregation. COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib are widely used for pain relief. Because coxibs exhibit cardiovascular side effects, they are often prescribed in combination with low-dose aspirin to prevent thrombosis. Our studies predict that the cardioprotective effect of low-dose aspirin on COX-1 may be blunted when taken with coxibs.