Alterations in left ventricular relaxation during atrioventricular pacing in humans

To determine whether the asynchronous left ventricular contraction-relaxation sequence that exists during right ventricular pacing alters left ventricular relaxation, measurements of both the maximal rate of decline of left ventricular pressure (peak negative dP/dt) and the time constant of left ventricular relaxation were obtained during atrial and atrioventricular (AV) pacing in 25 patients referred for diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Heart rate was maintained at 10 to 15 beats/min above the sinus rate at rest, and relaxation was assessed during atrial pacing, AV pacing and repeat atrial pacing. The patients were classified into two groups. Group 1 included 10 patients with normal left ventricular systolic function at rest (ejection fraction greater than 0.55) and without evidence of prior myocardial infarction. Group 2 included 15 patients with a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction or akinesia of one or more left ventricular segments on the contrast ventriculogram, or both. Heart rate, peak left ventricular systolic pressure, end-systolic pressure and end-diastolic pressure remained constant during atrial, AV pacing and repeat atrial pacing in all patients. In group 1 patients, the decrease in peak negative dP/dt (1,507 +/- 200 versus 1,424 +/- 187 mm Hg/s) and the increase in the time constant of left ventricular relaxation (48 +/- 11 versus 51 +/- 11 ms) during AV pacing was not significantly different when compared with values during atrial pacing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Left ventricular-based cardiac stimulation post AV nodal ablation evaluation (the PAVE study)

BACKGROUND: Chronic right ventricular pacing has been reported to promote cardiac dyssynchrony. The PAVE trial prospectively compared chronic biventricular pacing to right ventricular pacing in patients undergoing ablation of the AV node for management of atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular rates. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-four patients requiring AV node ablation were randomized to receive a biventricular pacing system (n = 103) or a right ventricular pacing system (n = 81). The study endpoints were change in the 6-minute hallway walk test, quality of life, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Patient characteristics were similar (64% male; age: 69 +/- 10 years, ejection fraction: 0.46 +/- 0.16; 83%, NYHA Class II or III). At 6 months postablation, patients treated with cardiac resynchronization had a significant improvement in 6-minute walk distance, (31%) above baseline (82.9 +/- 94.7 m), compared to patients receiving right ventricular pacing, (24%) above baseline (61.2 +/- 90.0 m) (P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in the quality-of-life parameters. At 6 months postablation, the ejection fraction in the biventricular group (0.46 +/- 0.13) was significantly greater in comparison to patients receiving right ventricular pacing (0.41 +/- 0.13, P = 0.03). Patients with an ejection fraction 相似文献   

The role of pacing mode in the development of atrial fibrillation.

Asynchronous ventricular pacing has been shown to increase the risk of development of atrial fibrillation (AF) because of various mechanisms: retrograde atrioventricular (AV) conduction with increase in atrial pressure causing acute atrial stretch and reverse flow in the pulmonary veins, mitral regurgitation, reduced coronary blood flow, adverse neuroendocrine reactions, etc. Dual-chamber pacing preserves atrioventricular synchrony. However, in randomized multicentre trials comparing VVI(R) with DDD(R) pacing, AF is only slightly less frequent in the dual-chamber mode. This is most likely due to unnecessary ventricular pacing, which is frequent in dual-chamber pacing. At nominal values, dual-chamber devices usually do not permit intrinsic AV conduction but promote delivery of the ventricular stimulus at an inappropriate time in an inappropriate place. Programming of long AV delays facilitates spontaneous AV conduction but usually cannot completely avoid unnecessary ventricular pacing and causes other problems in the dual-chamber mode. Atrial septal lead placement can improve left-sided AV synchrony and promote spontaneous AV conduction. Programming of the AAI(R) mode is superior to the dual-chamber mode but cannot be used if AV conduction is impaired intermittently or permanently. Therefore, dedicated algorithms enhancing spontaneous AV conduction in the dual-chamber mode are desirable for a large proportion of pacemaker patients.     

Electrocardiographic Follow‐Up of Biventricular Pacemakers

Multisite pacing for the treatment of heart failure has added a new dimension to the electrocardiographic evaluation of device function. During left ventricular (LV) pacing from the appropriate site in the coronary venous system, a correctly positioned lead V1 registers a right bundle branch block pattern with few exceptions. During biventricular stimulation associated with right ventricular (RV) apical pacing, the QRS is often positive in lead V1. The frontal plane QRS axis is usually in the right superior quadrant and occasionally in the left superior quadrant. Barring incorrect placement of lead V1 (too high on the chest), lack of LV capture, LV lead displacement or marked latency (exit block or delay from the stimulation site), ventricular fusion with the spontaneous QRS complex, a negative QRS complex in lead V1 during biventricular pacing involving the RV apex probably reflects different activation of an heterogeneous biventricular substrate (ischemia, scar, His‐Purkinje participation in view of the varying patterns of LV activation in spontaneous left bundle branch block) and does not necessarily indicate a poor (electrical or mechanical) contribution from LV stimulation. In this situation, it is imperative to rule out the presence of coronary venous pacing via the middle cardiac vein or even unintended placement of two leads in the RV. During biventricular pacing with the RV lead in the outflow tract, the paced QRS in lead V1 is often negative and the frontal plane paced QRS axis is often directed to the right inferior quadrant (right axis deviation). In patients with sinus rhythm and a relatively short PR interval, ventricular fusion with competing native conduction during biventricular pacing may cause misinterpretation of the ECG because narrowing of the paced QRS complex simulates appropriate biventricular capture. This represents a common pitfall in device follow‐up. Elimination of ventricular fusion by shortening the AV delay, is often associated with clinical improvement. Anodal stimulation may complicate threshold testing and should not be misinterpreted as pacemaker malfunction. One must be cognizant of the various disturbances that can disrupt 1:1 atrial tracking and cause loss of ventricular resynchronization. (1) Upper rate response. The upper rate response of biventricular pacemakers differs from the traditional Wenckebach upper rate response of conventional antibradycardia pacemakers because heart failure patients generally do not have sinus bradycardia or AV junctional conduction delay. The programmed upper rate should be sufficiently fast to avoid loss of resynchronization in situations associated with sinus tachycardia. (2) Below the programmed upper rate. This may be caused by a variety of events (especially ventricular premature complexes and favored by the presence of first‐degree AV block) that alter the timing of sensed and paced events. In such cases, atrial events become trapped into the postventricular atrial refractory period at atrial rates below the programmed upper rate in the presence of spontaneous AV conduction. Algorithms are available to restore resynchronization by automatic temporary abbreviation of the postventricular atrial refractory period.     

Reversibility of hypotension and shock by atrial or atrioventricular sequential pacing in patients with right ventricular infarction

Hypotension and shock associated with heart block and other forms of atrioventricular (AV) dissociation frequently accompany right ventricular infarction (RVI). Such patients do not invariably improve with ventricular pacing. We evaluated the relative effects of AV dissociated rhythms (ventricular pacing or nodal rhythm) and AV synchronous rhythms (atrial pacing, AV sequential pacing, or return to normal sinus rhythm) in seven patients with RVI complicated by AV dissociation, who had hypotension or shock. Hemodynamic monitoring demonstrated the characteristic features of RVI in all patients. Restoration of AV synchrony resulted in a highly significant (p ≤ 0.001) increase in systolic blood pressure (88.0 ± 16.5 mm Hg to 133.0 ± 21.8 mm Hg), cardiac output (3.8 ± 0.9 L/min to 5.7 ± 0.9 L/min), and stroke volume (40.5 ± 6.9 cc to 61.0 ± 10.0 cc). We conclude that restoration of normal AV synchrony has a marked effect on stroke volume in this setting and that atrial or AV pacing can reverse hypotension and shock in RVI complicated by AV dissociation.     

Right ventricular infarction: unusual electrocardiographic and electrophysiological manifestations

Right ventricular infarction occurs in 19-43% of patients with acute inferior wall infarction (Lorell et al., 1979). Its clinical, hemodynamic, and anatomic features are well known and include associated inferior wall infarction, distended neck veins, clear lung fields, hypotension, and heart block (Cintron et al., 1981; Coma-Canella et al., 1979; Lloyd et al., 1981; Lopez-Sendon et al., 1981; Raabe and Chester, 1978; Rotman et al., 1974). Isolated right ventricular infarction is less frequent and occurs in 2.5-4.6% of autopsy studies of myocardial infarction (Cohn et al., 1974; Erhardt et al., 1976; Wartman and Hellerstein, 1948). This report describes a patient with isolated right ventricular infarction with unusual electrophysiological findings. Her initial electrocardiogram showed atrial escape rhythm with incomplete right bundle-branch block and left posterior hemiblock. Later, she developed atrioventricular (AV) block with supra- and infra-Hisian, "phase 4," conduction defects. The sinus malfunction and high degree AV block persisted over 2 weeks and an atrioventricular sequential pacemaker was implanted. Hymodynamic study showed that her cardiac output was highly dependent on the heart rate and properly timed AV interval, and the pacemaker was programmed accordingly.     

Coronary Blood Flow Changes During Atrioventricular Sequential Pacing with Different Atrioventricular Delays in Normal Individuals

This study examined the effects of different atrioventricular (AV) intervals, during AV sequential pacing, on hemodynamics and coronary blood flow in individuals with normal hearts. Left anterior descending artery blood flow velocity was measured, using intracoronary Doppler, in 17 normal individuals. Five pacing tests were applied in random order for 5 min, at 15 beats/min above the sinus rate. Four tests using AV sequential pacing with AV intervals of 175, 150, 100, and 50 ms, and one using atrial pacing were applied. Mean flow velocity was 21 ± 9 cm/s, 20 ± 9 cm/s, 17 ± 7 cm/s, 17 ± 7 cm/s, and 22±10 cm/s, respectively (F = 8.87, p = .00001). The hemodynamic effects of these 5 pacing tests were assessed in 8 different normal subjects. Isovolumic relaxation time constant and left ventricular systolic pressure decreased, whereas right atrial pressure increased during AV sequential pacing with short AV intervals. Thus, during short-term AV sequential pacing at rest, coronary blood flow in a normal left anterior descending artery decreases with short AV intervals.     

External cardiac pacing in right ventricular infarction

A patient with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction presented with clinical evidence of right ventricular infarction complicated by bradycardia and cardiogenic shock. Pharmacologic interventions produced no change in heart rate or blood pressure, and a transvenous pacemaker failed to capture the infarcting right ventricle. An external transthoracic pacemaker immediately increased the heart rate with a marked hemodynamic improvement. In the setting of right ventricular infarction, external pacing may be more effective than transvenous pacing, perhaps due to its ability to pace the left ventricle.     

Assessment of upgrading to biventricular pacing in patients with right ventricular pacing and congestive heart failure after atrioventricular junctional ablation for chronic atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with right ventricular pacing and congestive heart failure (CHF) have only been reported in limited series. CRT in patients with atrial fibrillation remains controversial. Patients with AV junctional ablation offer a unique opportunity to study the effects of CRT in patients with right ventricular pacing combined with atrial fibrillation. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the effects of upgrading to biventricular pacing patients with CHF, permanent atrial fibrillation, and prior ablation of the atrioventricular (AV) junction followed by conventional right ventricular pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 16 consecutive patients with permanent atrial fibrillation treated by AV junctional ablation. After a mean follow-up of 20+/-19 months (6 weeks to 5 years) they were successfully upgraded to biventricular pacing for severe CHF. Parameters were prospectively evaluated at baseline and at 6 months. The 14 surviving patients at 6 months demonstrated significant improvement (P<0.02) in New York Heart Association class but the exercise test parameters remained unchanged. Cardiothoracic ratio decreased by 5% (P=0.04), end-systolic diameter by 8% (P=0.001), end-diastolic diameter by 4% (P=0.08), systolic pulmonary artery pressure by 17% (P<0.0001) and mitral regurgitation area by 40% (P<0.05). Ejection fraction increased by 17% (P=0.11) and fractional shortening by 24% (P=0.01). CONCLUSION: CRT improves left ventricular performance and functional status in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and prior remote right ventricular pacing.     

Prevalence of atrial fibrillation and stroke in paced patients without prior atrial fibrillation: A prospective study

Background: Several reports suggest that the incidence of stroke and atrial fibrillation is reduced in patients receiving physiologic pacemakers, compared with patients receiving a ventricular pacemaker. Hypothesis: The study was undertaken to address the impact of different pacing modalities on the incidence of stroke and atrial fibrillation. Methods: We prospectively analyzed 210 consecutive patients. Those with previous episodes of cerebral ischemia and/ or atrial fibrillation were excluded from the study. The study population included 100 patients paced for total atrioventricular (AV) block or second-degree AV block (type II Mobitz) and 110 patients paced for sick sinus syndrome (SSS). The pacing mode was randomized. All patients underwent a brain computed tomography (CT) scan at the date of enrollment and after 1 and 2 years. Patients were followed for 2 years, and the incidence of atrial fibrillation and stroke was evaluated. Results: The incidence of atrial fibrillation was 10% at 1 year and 11% at 2 years. Comparing the different pacing modalities, we reported an increase in the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients receiving ventricular pacing (p<0.05). On the other hand, no difference was found between patients paced for AV block and those paced for SSS. At the end of follow-up, we reported 29 cases of cerebral ischemia: 9 patients had AV block while 20 had SSS (p<0.05). Comparing the different pacing modalities, there was an increase in the incidence of stroke in patients receiving ventricular pacing (p< 0.05). Conclusion: There was an increase in the incidence of stroke and atrial fibrillation in patients with ventricular pacing.     

Echocardiographic assessment of tricuspid regurgitation during ventricular demand pacing

Twenty patients from our pacemaker clinic population were assessed clinically and by saline contrast echocardiography (subxiphoid view) to determine the prevalence of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and, if TR was present, its mechanism. The patients had no known TR before lead placement, a single transvenous right ventricular pacing lead present more than 6 months (mean 52, range 7 to 138), ventricular demand pacing alternating with sinus rhythm and rate programmability. Each patient was studied in sinus rhythm and during ventricular pacing. Using the criterion of inferior vena cava (IVC) contrast reflux during ventricular systole to diagnose TR, no patient had evidence of TR in sinus rhythm, consistent with clinical examination. During ventricular demand pacing, jugular venous pulse cannon A waves developed in 10 patients, and 18 patients (including these 10) had IVC contrast reflux during ventricular systole. Analysis of the timing of IVC reflux revealed its close temporal relation to the timing of atrial systole rather than a fixed timing during ventricular systole. This reflux occurred with loss of normal atrioventricular (AV) synchrony and the underlying mechanism in all cases was shown to be right atrial contraction against a closed tricuspid valve. Two patients who did not have such a pattern with pacing maintained normal AV synchrony. These observations indicate that: TR is an uncommon accompaniment of ventricular demand pacing; the jugular venous pulse and IVC echocardiographic contrast patterns during ventricular demand pacing simulate TR when AV asynchrony [corrected] occurs; and the IVC contrast pattern of pacing induced AV asynchrony [corrected] is best termed the cannon A wave synchronous pattern.     

Physiological cardiac pacing: Current status

Adverse hemodynamics of right ventricular (RV) pacing is a well-known fact. It was believed to be the result of atrio-ventricular (AV) dyssynchrony and sequential pacing of the atrium and ventricle may solve these problems. However, despite maintenance of AV synchrony, the dual chamber pacemakers in different trials have failed to show its superiority over single chamber RV apical pacing in terms of death, progression of heart failure, and atrial fibrillation (AF). As a consequence, investigators searched for alternate pacing sites with a more physiological activation pattern and better hemodynamics. Direct His bundle pacing and Para-Hisian pacing are the most physiological ventricular pacing sites. But, this is technically difficult. Ventricular septal pacing compared to apical pacing results in a shorter electrical activation delay and consequently less mechanical dyssynchrony. But, the study results are heterogeneous. Selective site atria pacing (atrial septal) is useful for patients with atrial conduction disorders in prevention of AF.     

Dilated cardiomyopathy following right ventricular pacing for AV block in young patients: resolution after upgrading to biventricular pacing systems

Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been demonstrated to result in clinical improvement in older adult patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), specifically those with left bundle branch block and prolonged QRS duration. We sought to demonstrate the benefits of CRT on improvement in cardiac function and clinical outcome in young patients that developed congestive heart failure (CHF) and DCM following cardiac pacing for AV block.
Methods and Results: We reviewed the charts of six patients who developed CHF or low cardiac output symptoms and DCM following implantation of right ventricular (RV)-based pacing systems for AV block, and subsequently underwent CRT. Patients ranged in age from 6 months to 23.7 years (mean: 11.3 ± 3.6 years). AV block was congenital (3), post-surgery (2), and acquired (1). Pacing had been performed for 0.1–14.5 (7.6 ± 2.4) years prior to development of DCM. Two patients required listing for cardiac transplantation. Following CRT: (1) QRS duration shortened from 204 ± 15 to 138 ± 10 msec, P = 0.002, (2) left ventricular ejection fraction improved from 34 ± 6 to 60 ± 2%, P = 0.003, and (3) left ventricular end diastolic dimension shortened from 5.5 ± 0.8 to 4.3 ± 0.5 cm, P =0.03. All patients demonstrated clinical improvement and have been weaned from CHF medications and listing for cardiac transplantation.
Conclusions: CRT can benefit young patients that develop CHF and DCM following RV pacing for AV block. Upgrading to biventricular pacing systems should be considered early in the management of these patients prior to listing for cardiac transplantation.     

Ventricular fibrillation complicating temporary ventricular pacing in acute myocardial infarction: Significance of right ventricular infarction

Five patients with acute myocardial infarction had ventricular fibrillation as a complication of indicated temporary pacing. All five patients had evidence of right ventricular infarction (three patients with postmortem confirmation). The presence of right ventricular infarction seems to be a contributing mechanism involved in the induction of ventricular fibrillation during temporary pacing for bradyarrhythmia complicating acute myocardial infarction.     

Left bundle branch pacing: A comprehensive review

Cardiac pacing is the only effective therapy for patients with symptomatic bradyarrhythmia. Traditional right ventricular apical pacing causes electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony resulting in left ventricular dysfunction, recurrent heart failure, and atrial arrhythmias. Physiological pacing activates the normal cardiac conduction, thereby providing synchronized contraction of ventricles. Though His bundle pacing (HBP) acts as an ideal physiological pacing modality, it is technically challenging and associated with troubleshooting issues during follow‐up. Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has been suggested as an effective alternative to overcome the limitations of HBP as it provides low and stable pacing threshold, lead stability, and correction of distal conduction system disease. This paper will focus on the implantation technique, troubleshooting, clinical implications, and a review of published literature of LBBP.     

右室流出道间隔部和心尖部起搏对心功能和重构的影响

目的比较右室流出道(RVOT)和右室心尖部(RVA)起搏对心脏做功和重构的影响。方法 83例缓慢心律失常的患者,其中男40例,女43例,随机分为RVOT间隔部起搏组(RVOT组,n=42)和RVA部起搏组(RVA组,n=41),观察两组QRS波时限、新出现心房颤动(简称房颤)的情况、心腔内径及左室射血分数(LVEF)的变化。结果随访11.47±1.67个月,两组术后QRS波时限均较术前明显延长(P<0.01),RVA组明显长于RVOT组(P<0.01);两组的左房内径和左室收缩末径均未见明显变化,RVA组1年后左室舒张末径较术前显著增加(53.53±5.72 mm vs 50.03±6.20 mm,P<0.05),两组1年后LVEF均较术前显著降低(RVOT、RVA比较分别为0.57±0.10 vs 0.62±0.11,0.53±0.08 vs 0.63±0.10,P均<0.01);两组新出现房颤例数亦未见差异。结论 RVOT起搏对心室重构的影响要好于RVA起搏。     

Hemodynamic effects of atrial septal pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients

INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous or pacing-induced interatrial conduction delay may affect the outcome of heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the atrial pacing site (right atrial appendage, RAA; and low interatrial septum, LIS) during biventricular (BV) pacing on the left ventricular (LV) systolic function in candidates for CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifteen heart failure patients with left bundle branch block and LV ejection fraction < or =35% were enrolled. Electrodes were placed at the RAA, LIS, right ventricular apex, and LV free wall. A DDD protocol was tested, which consisted of 50 beats in AAI mode from the RAA followed by 50 beats in BV DDD mode with atrial pacing at the RAA (DDD_RAA) or at the LIS (DDD_LIS) at four AV delays. The average (+/-SD)%LV+dP/dtmax increase during DDD_RAA and DDD_LIS pacing with respect to baseline was 24 +/- 16% and 21 +/- 15%, respectively (P < 0.01), and average percentage change in aortic pulse pressure during DDD_RAA and DDD_LIS with respect to baseline (%PP) was 13 +/- 8% and 13 +/- 7% (ns). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a significant hemodynamic improvement with both DDD_RAA and DDD_LIS biventricular pacing compared to AAI pacing. However DDD_LIS pacing was not superior to DDD_RAA pacing in acute hemodynamic responses.     

Electrophysiological studies in four patients with atrial flutter with 1:1 atrioventricular conduction

Electrophysiological studies of atrioventricular conduction during rapid atrial overdrive pacing and during programmed premature atrial stimulation are reported in four patients with an unusually rapid 1:1 ventricular response to atrial flutter (ventricular rates 240 to 310 per minute). Second-degree AV block developed during atrial overdrive pacing at rates well below those during which 1:1 AV conduction was sustained during spontaneous atrial flutter. Although none of the four patients showed evidence of pre-excitation on the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram, evidence suggesting a partial AV nodal bypass was demonstrated at electrophysiological study in one case. It is postulated that the profile of the atrial wavefront presented to the normal AV node by atrial flutter differs from that during high right atrial pacing and may account for the lower ventricular rates achieved during high right atrial overdrive pacing than during spontaneous atrial flutter in the remaining three cases.     

Atrial fibrillation: profit from cardiac pacing?

Summary The impact of cardiac pacing on the prevention of atrial fibrillation is under scientific investigation. Several prospective randomised clinical trials have reported that atrial-based physiologic AAI(R)- or DDD(R)-pacing is associated with a lower incidence of paroxysmal and permanent atrial fibrillation than single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with a conventional pacemaker indication. However, it is still uncertain whether atrial pacing itself has independent antiarrhythmic properties. In contrast, right ventricular pacing is considered to promote atrial fibrillation, even in preserved AV synchrony during dual-chamber pacing. The electrical secondary prevention of atrial fibrillation is mainly based on variations of the atrial pacing site and sophisticated preventive pacing algorithms incorporated in the pacemaker software. Dual-site right atrial and biatrial pacing were reported to exhibit modest to no benefit for the prevention of atrial fibrillation, whereas septal pacing and specific preventive pacing algorithms have been demonstrated to reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation in a number of clinical trials. However, the role of septal pacing and preventive pacing algorithms still has to be clarified since, overall, study results have been inconsistent so far. One of the main goals of future investigations should be the identification of responder groups of preventive pacing concepts. In clinical practice, the efficacy of pacing algorithms and septal pacing has to be determined in the individual case. These options should be taken into account in patients with symptomatic bradycardia as the indication for cardiac pacing and, in addition, symptomatic atrial fibrillation.

---

     

Selection of Pacing Mode after Interruption of Atrioventricular Conduction for Atrial Fibrillation: Observations from the PA3 Clinical Trial

The optimal pacing mode for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) following AV junction ablation remains the subject of some debate. Recent clinical trials have not demonstrated a superior advantage of maintenance of sinus rhythm over the rate control approach. However, clinical trials in pacemaker populations have demonstrated that physiologic pacing reduces the probability of paroxysmal and persistent AF compared to ventricular pacing. In the second phase of the PA(3) study, patients were randomized to DDDR versus VDD pacing in a cross over study design. Of the 67 patients randomized, 42% developed permanent AF within one year following ablation. AF frequency and burden increases early following AV junction ablation suggesting that ventricular pacing even in an atrial synchronous mode promotes AF. Given the high probability of permanent AF developing early following ablation, VVIR pacing appears to be the appropriate pacing mode for symptomatic patients undergoing total AV junction ablation.