Effects of inhaled corticosteroids on growth in asthmatic children: a comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide.

In asthmatic children inhaled corticosteroids are widely used. However, there are some concerns about the systemic adverse effects of these drugs, especially in the growing child. We performed this prospective study in order to compare the effects of 400 microg/day of budesonide (BUD) and 250 microg/day of fluticasone propionate (FP) on growth in prepubertal (aged 4-11.5 years), moderate persisting asthmatic children. One hundred patients (51 boys and 49 girls), who were randomized into two groups, were recruited for the study. The first group was treated with BUD, 2X 200 microg/day, and the second group was treated with FP, 2X 125 microg/day, by using a medium-size volume-spacer metered-dose inhaler. Growth in children with asthma who were treated by inhaled corticosteroids was calculated by growth velocity over a 12-month period. Comparisons between treatment groups were calculated by t-test and chi-square test. There were no significant differences between BUD and FP groups for sex, age, first height, and growth velocity. Moderate persisting, prepubertal asthmatic children treated with 250 microg/day of FP appeared to have no different linear growth than those children who received 400 microg/day of BUD.     

Systemic effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide in adult patients with asthma.

We assessed the systemic effects of budesonide (BUD) and fluticasone propionate (FP) in 23 patients with asthma, using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, and cross-over design. The following five treatments were given in a randomized order for 1 wk with a washout period in between of 2 wk: (1) placebo; (2) FP, 200 micrograms twice a day, inhaled from a Diskhaler; (3) FP, 1,000 micrograms twice a day, inhaled from a Diskhaler; (4) BUD, 200 micrograms twice a day, inhaled from a Turbuhaler; and (5) BUD, 800 micrograms twice a day, inhaled from a Turbuhaler. The primary variable was the area under the curve of serum cortisol versus time (AUC0-20), derived from serum samples taken every 2 h over a 20-h period following the last evening dose at 10:00 P.M. The lower doses of BUD and FLU did not cause any adrenal suppression. Compared with placebo, however, FP (1, 000 micrograms, twice daily and BUD (800 micrograms, twice daily) decreased the AUC0-20 by 34 and 16%, respectively. Fluticasone (1,000 micrograms, twice daily) was more suppressive than BUD (800 micrograms, twice daily) (p = 0.0006). The FEV1, measured the morning after the last inhalation, was significantly higher after the active treatments, compared with placebo (p < 0.02), but did not differ between all active treatments. We conclude that high doses of BUD and FP (in particular the latter), inhaled via their respective dry powder inhalers for 1 wk, result in a measurable systemic activity in patients with asthma.     

The cost-effectiveness of inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide in the treatment of asthma in adults and children.

Inhaled corticosteroids form the mainstay of the treatment and management of asthma and the results of a meta-analysis comparing two of the most frequently prescribed inhaled corticosteroids, fluticasone propionate and budesonide, administered in a clinically equivalent 1:2 dose ratio to 1980 patients with asthma, demonstrated that fluticasone propionate had an improved efficacy:safety ratio. However, limited data are available on the relative economic benefits of fluticasone propionate and budesonide. The database for clinically relevant parameters, for which the efficacy:safety meta-analysis had demonstrated statistical significance between the two corticosteroids, was used for this pharmacoeconomic analysis. Treatment with fluticasone propionate was more cost-effective than budesonide with respect to improvement in morning peak expiratory flow rate, successfully treated weeks, symptom-free days, symptom-free 24 h and episode-free days. The costs of treatment for fluticasone propionate and budesonide were 7.78 Pounds per week and 12.33 Pounds per week, respectively. The main contributing factor to the higher costs of budesonide was the higher cost of health care contacts, which were 4.53 Pounds per week for budesonide and 0.57 Pounds per week for fluticasone propionate. The pharmacoeconomic difference increased in favour of fluticasone propionate as the criteria for success were made more stringent. These results demonstrate that, for asthma patients requiring modification of therapy treatment with fluticasone propionate is more effective and also cheaper, in terms of overall health-care costs, than treatment with budesonide.     

A comparison of the efficacy and safety of a half dose of fluticasone propionate with beclamethasone dipropionate and budesonide in childhood asthma.

This study was carried out in an attempt to compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) at the half dose of budesonide (BUD) and beclamethasone dipropionate (BD) in childhood asthma. Ninety-six children with moderate to severe asthma (9.6 +/- 2.17 years) whose asthma was already controlled on BUD (n = 52) or BD (n = 44) were recruited into the study. In the first part of the study (the first 12 weeks) each group was followed with three weekly lung function measurements, daily diary records, and peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements on the initial medication. At the end of 6 weeks, drugs were switched to a half dose of FP, and the subjects were followed for another 6 weeks. Blood samples were obtained for osteocalcin and plasma cortisol levels after each treatment period. In the second part of the study, 50 patients continued to take FP at the half dose of BUD or BD for another 30 weeks. Clinic visits, including lung function and PEF measurements, were conducted every 10 weeks. After 6 weeks of FP treatment, there was a small but statistically significant decrease in FEV1 and FEF(25-75) in both groups (BUD and BD) without any significant obstruction. These mild changes in lung function measurements continued during long-term follow-up. However, there was no statistically significant further decrease in any lung function parameters while receiving FP (visits 3-8) (coefficient = -0.00751 L/day, p = 0.39 for FEF(25-75) and coefficient = -0.00910 L/sec/day, p = 0.055 for FEV1). There were no significant changes in the morning and evening PEF measurements and diurnal PEF variations after 6 weeks of treatment with FP compared with BUD and BD treatments. There were no significant changes in basal cortisol and osteocalcin levels before or after 6 weeks of FP treatment (p > 0.05). The present study concluded that, although FP at the half dose of BUD or BD seems to maintain reasonable control of the disease symptoms, a mild but significant and persistent decrease in lung function parameters may indicate that FP may not be twice as potent as BUD or BD in childhood asthma by evaluation of lung functions. This conclusion must be further verified with long-term studies.     

Beclometasone dipropionate extrafine aerosol versus fluticasone propionate in children with asthma

Beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) extrafine is a hydrofluoroalkane-based, chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free inhalation aerosol. This study was conducted to determine whether BDP extrafine and CFC-fluticasone proprionate (FP) aerosols were equivalent in terms of efficacy and tolerability in children with symptomatic mild-to-moderate asthma. Male and female patients (aged 5-12 yr) with an asthma diagnosis for > or =3 months, peak expiratory flow (PEF) > or =60% of predicted normal and suboptimal asthma control were randomised to double-blind treatment with BDP extrafine 200 microg day(-1) (n=139) or CFC-FP 200 microg day(-1) (n=141) for up to 18 weeks. After 6 and 12 weeks, study medication was 'stepped down' to 100 and 50 microg day(-1), respectively, if patients had achieved good asthma control. Patients with poor asthma control discontinued from the study and those with intermediate control continued in the study but did not undergo a dose reduction. The estimated treatment difference in morning PEF% predicted at 6 weeks was -1.9% (90% CI -4.9, 1.0). There was a trend towards a greater increase in forced vital capacity (% predicted) in the BDP extrafine group (5.3 versus 0.4%; p=0.084). A 'step-down' in therapy to 100 microg day(-1) was possible in 36% and 42% of patients in the BDP extrafine and CFC-FP groups, respectively, at 6 weeks. Both drugs were well tolerated. BDP extrafine and CFC-FP aerosols were equally effective at improving asthma control in children with mild-to-moderate asthma at the same daily dose.     

Initiation of maintenance therapy with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination therapy in moderate asthma: a comparison with fluticasone propionate.

The objective of this study was to investigate initial maintenance treatment with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (Seretide) 50/250 microg twice daily (SFC) compared with fluticasone propionate (Flixotide) 250 microg twice daily (FP) (both via Diskus inhaler, GlaxoSmithKline, Greenford, UK) in patients with moderate persistent asthma currently only treated with inhaled short-acting beta2-agonists. A total of 362 adults and adolescents (12 to 80 years of age) were randomized to this 12-week double-blind parallel-group study. The primary endpoint was mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF). Secondary efficacy endpoints included median percentages of symptom-free and rescue-free days and nights; the percentage of patients who achieved the pre-defined criteria for well-controlled asthma over weeks 5 to 12; and the incidence of asthma exacerbations. Safety was assessed by the incidence of adverse events. Superiority of SFC over FP alone was demonstrated for the primary and each secondary endpoint. The difference in adjusted mean change from baseline in morning PEF between SFC and FP was 21 L/min (95% CI: 11, 31; p<0.001). Significantly more patients achieved well-controlled asthma during treatment with SFC (46%) compared with FP (32%) (odds ratio 1.84; 95% CI: 1.17, 2.89; p=0.008). Both treatments were safe and well-tolerated. This study demonstrates that initial maintenance treatment with SFC 50/250 mug twice daily provides superior efficacy to FP 250 microg twice daily alone in patients with moderate persistent asthma.     

Dose-response studies of fluticasone propionate and budesonide: classification based on asthma severity.

There are discrepancies in the results of dose-response studies of inhaled steroids. Although some studies show a dose-response relationship, others show no change in outcome with increasing the dose of inhaled steroids. These discrepancies are partly caused by the heterogeneity of dose-response studies. One area of heterogeneity is the subjects' level of asthma severity at baseline. The objective of this study was to classify dose-response studies of two widely used inhaled steroids for asthma, fluticasone propionate (FP), and budesonide (BUD), according to the subjects' level of asthma severity at baseline. A PubMed search, limited to the English language and human subjects, was conducted from January of 1983 to January of 2004, using "dose response and budesonide" (331 articles) and "dose-response and fluticasone" (211 articles). Bibliographies of selected articles were searched for more references. Articles with at least two doses of the same inhaled steroid and one objective marker of asthma were included, resulting in 29 articles for FP and 32 articles for BUD. Studies vary widely in their assessment and reporting of indicators of asthma severity and control at baseline but could be classified according to the level of steroid use at baseline as an indicator of asthma severity. Studies with all or some patients on oral steroids at baseline consistently showed a dose response. Although heterogeneity of dose-response studies make their classification and interpretation difficult, a dose response was consistently noted when all or some patients were on oral steroids at baseline.     

The effect of high-dose fluticasone propionate and budesonide on lung function and asthma exacerbations in patients with severe asthma.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the comparative efficacy and safety of equal doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) and inhaled budesonide (BUD) using their respective dry powder inhalers in a population of severe asthmatics requiring high doses of inhaled corticosteroid. This double-blind double-dummy parallel-group study compared the effects of 24 weeks of treatment with FP (2000 micrograms daily via a Diskhaler inhaler; Glaxo Wellcome, Evreux, France) and BUD (2000 micrograms daily via a Turbuhaler inhaler; Astra Pharmaceuticals, Rijswijka, Netherlands) on lung function and asthma exacerbations in 395 patients with asthma. FP was statistically significantly superior to BUD with respect to the percentage of symptom-free days (P = 0.02), the incidence of days free from rescue bronchodilator usage (P = 0.02) and the distribution of change in peak expiratory flow (PEF) expressed as a percentage of the predicted PEF (P = 0.04). During the treatment period FP was statistically significantly superior to BUD for change in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) at 8, 16 and 24 weeks, change in the median daytime symptom score during weeks 5-16, for incidence of symptom-free days and incidence of days free from rescue bronchodilator usage during weeks 17-24. There was no significant difference between FP and BUD with respect to the number of patients experiencing one or more asthma exacerbation (33.8 and 28.4% of patients, respectively). There was, however, evidence that the exacerbations were clinically less severe in patients treated with FP, in that the time to resolution was quicker (11.0 vs. 14.7 days; P = 0.035), mean duration of all exacerbations (for an individual patient) tended to be shorter (18.5 vs. 23.6 days; P = 0.12), the time off work was reduced (4.2 vs. 7.6 days; P = 0.012) and the lowest PEF recorded during the exacerbation was higher (301 vs. 263 l min-1; P = 0.07). There were no clinically relevant differences in the safety (serum cortisol levels, markers of bone turnover, adverse events) of FP and BUD at these microgram equivalent doses. The patients recruited into this study, in retrospect, probably had no need for such high doses of inhaled corticosteroid but, irrespective of this, FP at microgram equivalent doses showed evidence of superior efficacy to BUD with respect to lung function and severity of asthma exacerbations without producing any greater adverse systemic effect.     

A comparison of clinical use of fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate in pediatric asthma

Inhaled steroids play a very important role in the prevention and treatment of asthma. Previous studies indicated that fluticasone propionate (FP) had low bioavailability and high local potency. However, the laboratory data in these studies were not obtained among Taiwan population. It is very important that native data should be established. Thus a 12-week research program was designed, involving 77 patients, 51 for FP group and 26 for beclomethasone dipropionate (BD) group. The objects were victims of moderate to severe asthma and their age ranged from 4 to 14 years old. An open, comparative and randomized method was adopted. Except for the 4-week-later daytime symptom score(P = 0.033, BD group was better), no other significant differences were found between the two groups in the symptom score improvement(P > 0.05). All the P-values for the daytime & night-time scores were lower than 0.001, which means obvious improvement after treatment in both groups. P-value for PEF improvement was 0.003 after 4 weeks (BD group was better) and 0.943 after 8 weeks; for FEV1 improvement, it was 0.005 after 4 weeks(BD group was better) and 0.252 after 8 weeks; and for FEV1/FVC improvements, it was 0.067 after 4 weeks and 0.097 after 8 weeks. There was no statistic significance in total eosinophil count (TEC), IgE, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) serum level changes after 4 or 8 weeks. Adverse effects were all anticipated and no statistic significance showed up, either, between the two groups or in the cortisol levels (P > 0.05). In conclusion, native data indicated that the potency of 100 micrograms of FP was equal to that of 200 micrograms of BD and that few side effects were noted in FP group. It is recommended that this drug be introduced for clinical use.     

A comparison of short-term treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate and zafirlukast for patients with persistent asthma

PURPOSE: To compare the short-term efficacy and safety of low-dose fluticasone propionate with that of oral zafirlukast therapy for patients previously treated with beta-2-agonists alone, and to evaluate the potential therapeutic benefit of switching from zafirlukast to a low-dose inhaled corticosteroid. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study consisted of a 4-week randomized, double-blind treatment period followed by a 4-week open-label period. Two hundred ninety-four patients > or =12 years old with asthma previously uncontrolled with beta-2-agonists alone were randomly assigned to treatment with low-dose inhaled fluticasone (88 microg twice daily) or oral zafirlukast (20 mg twice daily). After 4 weeks, all patients discontinued their double-blind therapy and received open-label fluticasone (88 microg twice daily). Outcomes included pulmonary function, asthma symptoms, albuterol use, asthma exacerbations, and adverse events. RESULTS: During the double-blind treatment period, fluticasone patients had significantly greater improvements in morning peak flow (29.3 L/min vs. 18.3 L/min), percentage of symptom-free days (19.8% vs. 11.6%), and daily albuterol use (-1.8 puffs per day vs. -1.1 puffs per day) compared with zafirlukast patients (P < or =0.025, each comparison). During the open-label treatment period, patients switched from zafirlukast to fluticasone experienced additional improvements in morning peak flow (17.2 L/min), evening peak flow (13.6 L/min), and FEV(1) (0.11 liter) and daily albuterol use (-0.9 puffs daily) compared with values obtained at the end of the double-blind treatment period (P < or =0.001, each comparison). CONCLUSION: Low-dose fluticasone was more effective than zafirlukast in improving pulmonary function and symptoms in patients with persistent asthma. In addition, switching patients from zafirlukast to fluticasone further improved clinical outcomes.     

Adrenal suppression from high-dose inhaled fluticasone propionate in children with asthma.

This cross-sectional study was designed to examine the prevalence of adrenocortical suppression in children with asthma treated with high-dose inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP). Children and adolescents (n=50) with asthma, treated with inhaled FP at a dose of > or = 1,000 mg a day for > or = 6 months, were enrolled. Early morning serum cortisol was performed. Subjects with a serum cortisol of < 400 nmol x L(-1) had a tetracosactrin stimulation test. Fifty subjects of mean age 13.1 yrs were treated with a mean dose of 924.7 microg x m(-2) x day(-1) FP for a mean duration of 2 yrs. Of the 50 subjects, 36 (72%) had serum cortisol levels of < 400 nmol x L(-1) and underwent tetracosactrin stimulation test. Of these, 6 (17%) demonstrated a less than two-fold increase in serum cortisol from baseline and peak cortisol level of < or = 550 nmol x L(-1) at 30 or 60 min poststimulation. There was a significant negative correlation between the dose of FP x m(-2) and stimulated peak cortisol level. Biochemical evidence of adrenocortical insufficiency was demonstrated in 12% of the subjects, indicating that high-dose fluticasone propionate use may be associated with dose-dependent adrenocortical suppression.     

普仑司特联合丙酸氟替卡松治疗小儿哮喘的临床意义

目的分析普仑司特联合丙酸氟替卡松治疗小儿支气管哮喘的疗效。 方法选取2020年9月至2021年8月我院收治的小儿支气管哮喘患儿59例,随机分为对照组26例,给予雾化吸入丙酸氟替卡松吸入气雾剂治疗;观察组33例,给予普仑司特+丙酸氟替卡松治疗。对比两组患儿临床症状缓解时间、临床疗效、肺功能指标、嗜酸性粒细胞(EOS)及免疫球蛋白E(IgE)水平,及两组患儿不良反应。 结果观察组咳嗽消失、发热消退及肺部啰音消失时间均短于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患儿临床疗效分布差异显著(P<0.05),且观察组总有效率高于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后两组患儿FEV₁、FVC、FEV₁/FVC及PEF均升高(P<0.05),且观察组FEV₁、FVC、FEV₁/FVC及PEF均高于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后两组患儿EOS、IgE水平均降低(P<0.05),且观察组EOS、IgE水平均低于对照组(P<0.05)。 结论普仑司特联合丙酸氟替卡松治疗小儿支气管哮喘可缩短患儿临床症状改善时间、提高临床疗效,改善患儿肺功能,有效调节EOS、IgE水平。     

EXCEL: A randomised trial comparing salmeterol/fluticasone propionate and formoterol/budesonide combinations in adults with persistent asthma

OBJECTIVES: This multicentre, parallel group, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised 24-week study was designed to compare the efficacy of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination (SFC) 50/250 microg one inhalation twice daily (bid) with formoterol/budesonide combination (FBC) 6/200 microg two inhalations bid in patients with persistent asthma, currently receiving 1000-2000 microg/day of inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: The intent-to-treat population comprised 694 patients in the SFC group and 697 patients in the FBC group. RESULTS: The primary endpoint, mean rate of all exacerbations over 24 weeks, was similar in both treatment groups (SFC: 2.69; FBC: 2.79; SFC/FBC ratio 0.96; 95% CL 0.84, 1.10; P=0.571). A reduction in the rate of exacerbations over time was observed in both treatment groups. Overall, there was a 30% lower annual rate of moderate/severe exacerbations in the SFC group compared with the FBC group (95% CI 0-49%, 52% reduction vs. 1% increase; P=0.059). This effect increased with time: in weeks 17-24 the moderate/severe exacerbation rate was 57% lower in the SFC group compared with the FBC group (95% CI 21-77% reduction; P=0.006). Similar improvements in lung function, asthma symptoms and rescue medication usage were seen with both treatments and both were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Twice-daily treatment with SFC and FBC over 6 months significantly improved asthma symptoms and lung function in patients with persistent asthma. The rate of exacerbations was significantly reduced over time on both treatments but SFC was found to be significantly superior to FBC in reducing the rate of moderate/severe exacerbations with sustained treatment.     

Effect of high-dose fluticasone propionate on bone density and metabolism in children with asthma

Significant concern remains over the long-term side effects of inhaled steroids. This cross-sectional study evaluates the effect of high-dose inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) on biochemical markers of bone metabolism and bone density in children with asthma. Children with chronic asthma using FP >/= 1,000 mcg daily for at least 6 months, and healthy controls, were entered in the study. No children had taken oral prednisolone within the previous month. Fasting morning serum was analyzed for bone formation markers, and spot urine for bone resorption markers. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) results were reviewed in a subgroup of patients. Forty-nine children with asthma and 32 controls were recruited. The mean FP dose was 771.2 +/- 253.35 mcg/m2/day. Unpaired t-test analysis revealed no significant difference in biochemical markers studied. In subjects with asthma; 13 of 37 (35.1%) had lumbar spine density more than one standard deviation below the mean (P = 0.001). This fell to 6/37 (16.2%) with bone age correction (NS). In conclusion, no significant reduction in bone metabolism or bone age-corrected bone mineral density was observed in children with asthma on prolonged high doses of inhaled FP.