Late subannular aortic root rupture following transcatheter aortic valve implantation presenting as ST elevation myocardial infarction

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has transformed the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. Here, we present a case of late aortic root rupture presenting as ST‐elevation myocardial infarction five weeks following successful TAVI. Aortic root rupture is a rare complication of TAVI, which occurs in ～1% of procedures and usually arises during or soon after the procedure and is associated with high mortality (～50%). Early recognition of late‐presenting complications related to TAVI, including aortic root rupture, is essential for specialists and nonspecialists. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Sequential trans‐catheter aortic valve implantation and abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Aortic stenosis in the elderly population is an increasing problem, with many patients being considered too high risk for surgery, and therefore being denied treatment. A percutaneous method of treatment in the form of trans‐catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is becoming an increasingly attractive option in this group of patients. Although, TAVI has been shown to be successful and improve cardiovascular haemodynamics, assessment of other comorbidities in this susceptible group of patients is essential to ensure good clinical outcomes. The presence of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in our patient was an example of an important comorbidity which could have a significant impact on the outcome of TAVI, if not managed appropriately. The increased systolic pressure post successful TAVI will result in an increased strain within the AAA with an increased risk of rupture. Therefore, a timely management strategy for the AAA was necessary. Our case is of sequential TAVI followed by Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The patient underwent uncomplicated TAVI. There was complete abolition of trans‐aortic gradient. EVAR was successfully undertaken three weeks post TAVI. The patient made an excellent recovery and remained well at six months follow‐up. Our case highlights the importance of a detailed assessment in all patients prior to consideration for TAVI and the importance of having a management strategy for both pathologies tailored to the patient. This case demonstrates the benefits of development of trans‐catheter techniques for two different conditions. Future developments including reduction of sheath size reduction and EVAR and TAVI device evolution, may enable simultaneous treatment of aortic stenosis and abdominal aortic aneurysm as a combined percutaneous procedure under local anaesthetic. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Critical aortic stenosis in a patient with a large saccular abdominal aortic aneurysm

Elderly patients with aortic stenosis are often deemed too high risk, and consequently turned down for conventional surgery. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a safe and an increasingly attractive option in this group of patients. Although TAVI has been shown to be successful and safe, the cardiovascular assessment of other co‐morbidities in this susceptible group of patients is critical to ensuring good clinical outcomes. The presence of a saccular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in our patient was an example of an important co‐morbidity which could have a significant impact on the outcome of TAVI, if not managed appropriately. The increased systolic pressure post successful TAVI will result in an increased strain within the wall of the saccular AAA with an increased risk of rupture. Therefore, a timely management strategy for the AAA was necessary. We believe that we report the first case of simultaneous TAVI and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The patient underwent uncomplicated transfemoral TAVI immediately followed by successful drive‐by percutaneous EVAR delivered over the same superstiff guidewire via the transfemoral route. Our case highlights the importance of a detailed assessment in all patients before consideration for TAVI, and the multi‐disciplinary team and a management strategy for both pathologies tailored to the patient. The case demonstrates the versatility of trans‐catheter techniques which has enabled the treatment of aortic stenosis and abdominal AAA in a single procedure. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Valve prosthesis distortion after cardiac compression in a patient who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been developed as an alternative to conventional aortic valve replacement for the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis in high‐risk patients. Nevertheless, TAVI has been associated with serious complications such as stroke, vascular injury, renal failure, and arrhythmia. Herein we describe a case of distortion of the Edward‐Sapien prosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, USA), which was mounted on a balloon‐expandable stent, after chest compression for cardiac resuscitation in a patient who underwent TAVI for severe aortic stenosis. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

“Valve‐in‐valve” for the treatment of paravalvular leaks following transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is commonly associated with some degree of aortic regurgitation (AR) secondary to the presence of paravalvular leaks. We present the case of an 86‐year‐old woman diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVI with a 23‐mm Edwards‐SAPIEN valve. The procedure complicated with a severe paravalvular leak following TAVI that was unresponsive to balloon postdilation. This complication was successfully managed with the implantation of a second valve of the same diameter within the first one (“valve‐in‐valve”) resulting in trivial residual AR and the absence of significant transvalvular gradient at the end of the procedure. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

First‐in‐man transcatheter aortic valve implantation of a 20‐mm edwards SAPIEN XT valve: One step forward for the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis and small aortic annulus

We present the case of an 85‐year‐old woman diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis, porcelain aorta, and a small aortic annulus (17.3 mm), who underwent successful transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with a 20‐mm Edwards SAPIEN XT valve using the NovaFlex+ delivery system. At 1‐month follow‐up the patient was in NYHA functional class I, and Doppler echocardiography showed a mean residual gradient of 15 mm Hg and trivial paravalvular aortic regurgitation. This case, which shows for the first time the feasibility of TAVI with a 20‐mm valve, opens a new avenue for the challenging treatment of patients with aortic stenosis and a small aortic annulus. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation 10 years after valve‐in‐valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation for failing aortic valve homograft root replacement

Valve‐in‐valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV‐TAVI) is an established therapy for a degenerated surgical bioprosthesis. TAVI‐in‐TAVI following ViV‐TAVI has not been previously performed. We report a high‐risk patient presenting with severe left ventricular failure secondary to undiagnosed critical aortic stenosis due to degeneration of the implanted transcatheter heart valve more than a decade after initial ViV‐TAVI for a failing stentless aortic valve homograft. Successful TAVI‐in‐TAVI reversed the clinical and echocardiographic changes of decompensated heart failure with no evidence of coronary obstruction.     

Iatrogenic dissection of the ascending aorta during TAVI sealed with the corevalve revalving prosthesis

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is rapidly becoming an accepted treatment option for a selected group of high risk or inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, this procedure is not without complications. We report a case of acute type A aortic dissection due to balloon aortic valvuloplasty during TAVI that was successfully sealed by the CoreValve prosthesis, thus avoiding surgical intervention.© 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Transcatheter Aortic valve implantation in a patient with circulatory collapse,using the lucas® chest compression system

We describe a case of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) using the LUCAS® Chest Compression System in an elderly high risk patient with severe aortic stenosis and heart failure. In this case, the patient developed severe aortic regurgitation following predilatation of the native aortic valve and automated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (A‐CPR) was initiated. The procedure was performed under ongoing A‐CPR for a total of 28 min. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit and to a step down unit the following day. At follow‐up 30 days later, she showed no signs of neurologic or cardiac damage. This case report shows, that it is possible to perform the TAVI procedure under ongoing A‐CPR and that A‐CPR, judged by invasive blood pressures, was capable of maintaining a satisfactory perfusion pressure even with a damaged aortic valve. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Transfemoral aortic valve implantation in pure native aortic valve insufficiency using the repositionable and retrievable lotus valve

Transfemoral aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for the treatment of pure native aortic insufficiency is not routine clinical practice. Absent cusp calcification, missing landmarks in combination with no perfect valve control during release with first‐generation TAVI devices resulted in a high rate for need of a second valve or relevant residual aortic insufficiency. We report the first case with a native pure aortic valve insufficiency at high surgical risk successfully treated by implantation of the repositionable and completely retrievable Lotus valve, resulting in a well‐controlled and safe procedure with no residual aortic insufficiency. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Trans‐apical aortic valve implantation complicated by left main occlusion

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a highly effective procedure for selected patients who are at high risk for aortic valve replacement; however, the incidence of severe complications is still relevant. Coronary occlusion during TAVI is a life‐threatening complication that requires immediate diagnosis and treatment. We report the case of an 87‐years‐old woman affected by severe aortic stenosis, symptomatic for refractory heart failure, who underwent urgent balloon aortic valvuloplasty and subsequent elective transapical aortic valve implantation. Valve deployment was complicated by cardiac arrest and hemodynamic collapse, and left main coronary artery occlusion was recognized and successfully recovered by balloon angioplasty and stent implantation. Patient is alive and well 6 months after procedure. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

A complex ventricular septal defect following transcatheter aortic valve implantation evaluated by 3D transthoracic echocardiography

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has revolutionized the treatment of elderly patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis. Among the possible TAVI complications, a rare one is the annular/left ventricular outflow tract rupture. We report a rare case of a late complex ventricular septal defect (VSD) following TAVI with a balloon‐expandable prosthesis, conservatively managed. Our case demonstrates the role of 3D transthoracic echocardiography (3DTTE) in the accurate diagnosis of this TAVI complication and suggests that, in some cases, it can be used as an alternative to other diagnostic tools, such as transesophageal echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, and computed tomography.     

Compassionate use of the self‐expandable medtronic corevalve prosthesis for the treatment of pure aortic regurgitation in a patient at prohibitive risk for surgical valve replacement

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a viable treatment option for high‐ and prohibitive‐risk patients with severe, calcified pure or predominant aortic valve stenosis, but not for pure aortic valve regurgitation. In fact, the use of TAVI for this indication is even considered unlikely due to the lack of calcium which appears essential for anchoring the stent‐valve and prevents dislocation. We report a case of a patient with severe, symptomatic pure aortic regurgitation, and a history of two previous open‐heart surgeries who was successfully treated by compassionate use implantation of an oversized Medtronic CoreValve prosthesis as an ultima ratio treatment option. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Delivery balloon‐induced ascending aortic dissection: An unusual complication during transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a relatively mature technique that is generally accepted as a promising treatment for inoperable patients and those who are high‐risk candidates for surgical aortic replacement. Although severe complications in the aortic valve complex, such as annular or aortic root rupture, are not frequently observed, these events could easily lead to catastrophic outcomes, and therefore remain major issues during TAVI. However, there remains a paucity of data describing these catastrophic complications because of their low incidence. We encountered the case of an 88‐year‐old woman complicated by a dissection of the ascending aorta during TAVI from an “unusual” cause: injury due to the delivery of a balloon‐expandable valve to a very narrow and heavily calcified sinotubular junction (STJ). This is the first report to demonstrate the mechanism of this complication; even a delivery balloon, not a stent frame, with low inflation pressure might injure a narrow STJ and lead to an aortic dissection. Therefore, the use of oversized delivery balloons should be avoided in patients with a narrow and calcified STJ. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

With the back against the wall: TAVI in a patient with endocarditis

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) is currently a well‐established therapeutic option in patients with severe aortic stenosis considered at prohibitive risk for open heart aortic valve replacement (Cribier et al., Circulation 2002;106:3006‐3008; Leon et al., Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;18:165‐174). We report a case of a patient with endocarditis by severe homograft aortic stenosis for which a TAVI procedure was performed with an excellent result. The patient was undergoing a presurgery standard screening in preparation for a planned aortic valve replacement operation when he developed a Staphyloccocus aureus sepsis. Transoesophageal echocardiography demonstrated an aortic valve vegetation. A few days later, the patient developed a stroke probably due to embolization of a vegetation. Given the clinical severity of the case a standard open heart aortic valve replacement was considered too risky and the patient underwent a TAVI procedure. Postintervention the patient had a spectacular evolution with fast normalization of the septic shock parameters and clinical status. Antibiotics were continued for a total of nine weeks. By the ambulatory controls at three weeks, two months and six months postdischarge, the patient was completely asymptomatic and his echocardiography showed a normally functioning aortic valve without indications of endocarditis. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for treatment of patients with degenerated aortic bioprostheses—valve‐in‐valve technique

Background: The management of patients with degeneration of surgical bioprosthetic valve replacement remains a challenge because of the higher risk of re‐do aortic valve replacement. We present a case series of five patients with degenerated aortic bioprostheses treated with transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods: From December 2009 to May 2010, five patients with degenerated aortic valve bioprostheses (aortic valve area < 1 cm² or severe aortic regurgitation), an excessive operative risk (EuroSCORE ≥ 30%), symptoms of heart failure (NYHA ≥ III) and an internal diameter of bioprosthetic aortic valve 20.5 ± 0.5 mm were included. Procedures were performed without hemodynamic support using femoral arteries. Balloon valvuloplasty with a 20‐mm balloon under rapid pacing was carried out before valve implantation. The 26‐mm CoreValve prosthesis, 18‐F‐generation (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) was inserted retrograde under fluoroscopic guidance. Invasive and echocardiographic measurements were done immediately before and after TAVI. Clinical followup and echocardiography were performed after procedure (mean followup 72 days ± 60, range: 176–30 days). Results: In all patients TAVI was successful with immediate decrease of transaortic peak‐to‐peak pressure (P = 0.002). Mild aortic regurgitation occurred in two patients and one patient received a new permanent pacemaker. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events did not arise. NYHA functional class improved in all patients and left ventricular ejection fraction increased (P = 0.019). Conclusion: Our experiences with the valve‐in‐valve technique using the CoreValve prosthesis suggest that transfemoral TAVI is feasible in high risk patients with degenerated aortic bioprostheses. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Rescue “valve in valve” implantation after late onset corevalve cusp rupture leading to acute massive aortic insufficiency

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as a feasible and effective alternative to aortic valve replacement in patients at high surgical risk, and is associated with a lower risk of death at 1 year follow‐up when compared with standard therapy. In a recent large study, enrolling 663 high risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis TAVI with the use of CoreValve system has been associated with early and sustained clinical and hemodynamic benefits, with a cumulative mortality of 15.0% at 1 year follow‐up. This study has shown that paravalvular aortic regurgitation after successful TAVI is a frequent finding, being of mild entity in the vast majority of cases, whereas valvular regurgitation is almost entirely absent or mild. Of note, no cases of structural valve deterioration were reported. We report a case of a successful implantation of a CoreValve that complicated with late onset massive intravalvular aortic regurgitation, due to CoreValve cusp rupture, leading to low output state with acute pulmonary edema, which was successfully treated with “valve in valve” implantation. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Transaortic transcatheter aortic valve implantation within a previous bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement

This report documents the first reported case of transaortic transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the CoreValve ReValving system (Medtronic CoreValve System, Luxembourg), within a previous bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. TAVI has become a recognized percutaneous treatment for patients with severe native or bioprosthetic aortic valve stenosis. However, as the number of patients screened for TAVI increases, a number of patients are found with absolutely no option for peripheral arterial access, either from the femoral or subclavian routes. Transaortic CoreValve placement offers an alternate minimally invasive hybrid surgical/interventional technique when peripheral access is not possible. A CoreValve prosthesis was implanted via the transaortic route in an 81‐year‐old woman with severe bioprosthetic aortic valve stenosis (21 mm Mitroflow pericardial valve, peak instantaneous gradient of 99 mmHg, effective valve orifice area (EOA) of 0.3 cm², as ilio‐femoral and left subclavian angiography revealed small calibre vessels (<6 mm). Access was achieved via a mini thoracotomy via the left anterior second intercostal space. The procedure went without complication. Post procedure the patient was transferred directly to the Cardiac Care Unit for recuperation. Post procedure echocardiography showed that the TAVI was well positioned with no para‐valvular leak and a reduction in peak instantaneous gradient to 30 mmHg and an increase in EOA to 1.5 cm². She was discharged on the third post‐procedural day in sinus rhythm with a narrow QRS complex. CoreValve implantation within previous surgical bioprosthesis is now an established treatment. The transaortic approach to transcatheter implantation is a promising recent development, when due to anatomical reasons, transfemoral or subclavian TAVI is not feasible. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Transient left anterior and septal fascicular blocks after self‐expandable percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is indicated in severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, when there is intermediate‐high surgical risk, or a condition considered inoperable, as in the case of “porcelain aorta” that could turn clamping or cannulation of the ascending aorta hazardous in open‐heart surgery. Among the complications of this less invasive procedure, intraventricular conduction disorders subsequent to the procedure stand out. TAVI causes worsening of intraventricular dromotropic disorders in more than 75% of the cases, with the presence of preexisting right bundle branch block and first‐degree atrioventricular block, deep prosthesis implant, male gender, size of the aortic annulus smaller than the prosthesis, and porcelain aorta being predictive of requirement for permanent pacemaker implant.     

Transfemoral aortic valve implantation following lithoplasty of iliac artery in a patient with poor vascular access

Transfemoral approach is considered the preferred route to perform transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) by most operators due to the low invasiveness and good outcome, as compared to non‐transfemoral approach. However, transfemoral access is not always feasible particularly in patients with small and calcific vessels. Recently, catheter‐based lithoplasty has emerged as a new technique based on the use of circumferential pulse pressure waves to disrupt calcific plaques. This technology may help to expand eligibility for transfemoral TAVI to patients with calcific ileo‐femoral vessels and at high risk for non‐transfemoral approach. We present the case of an 87‐year‐old woman with poor vascular access who successfully underwent transfemoral TAVI following lithoplasty of iliac artery.