Long-term prognosis of asthmatic patients treated with low-dose beclomethasone dipropionate]

To clarify the prognosis of asthmatics treated with low-dose of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), we retrospectively assessed 43 patients treated with initial dose of 200 or 400 micrograms/day for 5 years, and obtained the following results. 1) 15 patients achieved step-down therapy (group A), 17 patients maintained initial dose of BDP (group B), and 11 patients required step-up therapy of BDP or daily use of oral prednisolone (group C). 2) There was no significant difference in age, sex, duration of disease, severity of disease, peripheral eosinophil counts, %FEV1 and histamine PC20 before BDP treatment among three groups. The percentage of atopic asthmatics was significantly higher in group C than in group A. 3) There was no significant difference in symptom and histamine PC20 between after 1 year state and after 5 years state in three groups. 4) After 1 year from the start of BDP treatment, only 18% patients got symptom free and neither patients exceeded 20,000 micrograms/ml of histamine PC20 in group C. Long-term treatment of low-dose BDP inhalation was effective on mild/moderate asthmatics. Patients requiring step-up therapy had not got sufficient improvement in bronchial hyperresponsiveness after one-year treatment.     

Effects of pranlukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 antagonist, combined with inhaled beclomethasone in patients with moderate or severe asthma.

BACKGROUND: Although inhaled steroids are used as the first line of therapy in asthmatic patients, symptoms of asthma do not improve completely in some patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of pranlukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 antagonist, in patients with moderate/severe asthma, when combined with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP). METHODS: Protocol 1: After a 2-week observation period, 41 patients with moderate asthma were divided into those receiving BDP at 1,600 microg/day or 800 microg/day + pranlukast (450 mg/day). The effect of treatment was evaluated by measuring AM peak expiratory flow rate, symptom score, frequency of beta2-agonists, and daily variability of peak expiratory flow rate. Protocol 2: 39 patients participated in this study including those with moderate asthma on 800 microg/day BDP (group I), severe asthma on BDP at 1,600 microg/day (group II), and severe asthma on 1,600 microg/day BDP + 5 to 20 mg prednisolone (group III). Patients of all groups were additionally treated with pranlukast. RESULTS: Protocol 1: Both treatment regimens resulted in improvement in each clinical parameter. There were no significant differences in the effects of two treatment regimens. Protocol 2: Pranlukast was effective in group I and II, but not in group III. In groups I and II, pranlukast tended to be more effective when BDP was introduced within the first year of onset of asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Pranlukast is effective for patients with moderate asthma and those patients with severe asthma who are not treated with oral steroids. Pranlukast is more effective in patients treated with BDP early after onset.     

Comparison of roflumilast, an oral anti-inflammatory, with beclomethasone dipropionate in the treatment of persistent asthma

BACKGROUND: Roflumilast is an oral, once-daily phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor with anti-inflammatory activity in development for the treatment of asthma. Roflumilast was compared with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in patients with asthma. METHODS: In a double blind, double-dummy, randomized, noninferiority study, 499 patients (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] = 50-85% predicted) received roflumilast 500 microg once daily or BDP 200 microg twice daily (400 microg/day) for 12 weeks. Lung function and adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: Roflumilast and BDP significantly improved FEV1 by 12% (270 +/- 30 ml) and 14% (320 +/- 30 ml), respectively (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). Roflumilast and BDP also significantly improved forced vital capacity (FVC) (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). There were no significant differences between roflumilast and BDP with regard to improvement in FEV1 and FVC. Roflumilast and BDP showed small improvements in median asthma symptom scores (-0.82 and -1.00, respectively) and reduced rescue medication use (-1.00 and -1.15 median puffs/day, respectively; P < 0.0001 vs baseline). These small differences between roflumilast and BDP were not considered clinically relevant. Both agents were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Once daily, oral roflumilast 500 microg was comparable with inhaled twice-daily BDP (400 microg/day) in improving pulmonary function and asthma symptoms, and reducing rescue medication use in patients with asthma.     

Hypogammaglobulinemia in steroid-dependent asthmatics correlates with the daily dose of oral prednisolone

BACKGROUND: Steroid-induced adverse effects including suppression of humoral immunity should be considered in steroid-dependent severe asthma. Only a few studies have determined the exact steroid dose that could potentially suppress humoral immunity in asthmatics. METHODS: Randomly selected 100 adult asthmatics treated with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) were classified into three groups based on the dose of steroid to determine the serum IgG, IgA and IgM levels by radioimmunoassay. Relationships between serum immunoglobulin levels and the daily dose and duration of oral prednisolone (PSL) therapy were examined. RESULTS: None of the patients on inhaled corticosteroid alone had hypogammaglobulinemia. Patients on oral PSL at a dose >12.5 mg/day for at least 1 year had low serum IgG. There was no significant correlation between the duration of oral PSL therapy and serum IgG. CONCLUSIONS: Oral PSL can potentially suppress humoral immunity in severe asthma. In asthmatics, hypogammaglobulinemia could develop in those on a daily dose of PSL >12.5 mg, but is independent of the duration of such treatment. No suppression of humoral immunity was noted on inhaled corticosteroid therapy alone, either at low or high dose.     

Tapering dose of inhaled budesonide in subjects with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma treated with montelukast: a 16-week single-blind randomized study

Pharmacological therapy with inhaled steroids (IS) is currently considered the gold-standard of treatment for mild-persistent asthma. Leukotriene receptor antagonist drugs (LTRAs) play an important role associated with IS, allowing dose tapering and maintaining control of asthma symptoms. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of montelukast (MON) to allow tapering of the inhaled dose of budesonide (BUD) in patients with mild-moderate persistent asthma. This 16-wk single-blind randomized study included 40 asthmatic patients divided in 2 treatment groups. After a run-in period (4 wk), in which all patients inhaled 400 microg of BUD twice daily (bid), group A (20 patients) received MON (oral, 10 mg/day) combined with inhaled BUD (400 microg/bid), while group B (20 patients) was treated with BUD for the whole period of the study. In both groups, at every 4 wk the dose of BUD was halved. After 12 wk of treatment the mean value of forced expiratory volume during the first sec (FEV1, as % of predicted value) was significantly greater in group A compared with group B (94 +/- 7.5 vs 83.1 +/- 6.9; p<0.005). The mean values of peak expiratory flow (PEF), the percentages of asthmatic exacerbations, and the use of beta2-short-acting agonist (SABA) were similar in the 2 groups at 4, 8, and 12 wk. In conclusion, in patients with mild-moderate persistent asthma, MON therapy is useful in tapering the dose of IS in order to reduce its side effects and to maintain the clinical stability of the disease.     

Step-down therapy with low-dose fluticasone-salmeterol combination or medium-dose hydrofluoroalkane 134a-beclomethasone alone

BACKGROUND: Options for step-down therapy include use of inhaled corticosteroids alone or in combination with a long-acting beta2-agonist. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate step-down therapy with a fluticasone propionate-salmeterol (FP-SM) combination administered through a dry powder inhaler (DPI; Advair Diskus) versus a medium dose of hydrofluoroalkane 143a-beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) administered through a breath-actuated pressurized metered-dose inhaler (QVAR Autohaler). METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma were treated with 1000 microg of DPI-administered BDP twice daily (DPI-BDP) for 4 weeks and then randomized to 200 microg of HFA-BDP twice daily (n = 20) or 100 microg of FP and 50 microg of SM twice daily (FM-SM; n = 19) for 8 weeks in a double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group design. We measured the provocative dose of methacholine producing a 20% fall in FEV1 (methacholine PD20) as the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes being lung function, surrogate inflammatory markers, diary card responses, quality of life, and safety. RESULTS: There was a 0.9 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-1.2) doubling dose improvement in methacholine PD20 comparing asthma before versus after DPI-BDP. HFA-BDP maintained this improvement, whereas FP-SM produced a further significant improvement, amounting to a 1.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.2-2.1) doubling dose difference at 8 weeks for FP-SM versus HFA-BDP. Effects on FEV1, peak expiratory flow, and quality of life (symptoms and emotions) were similar to those on methacholine PD20, with a significant difference between FP-SM and HFA-BDP. Suppression of plasma and urinary cortisol and serum osteocalcin levels occurred with DPI-BDP, but values returned to baseline levels within 1 month of HFA-BDP or FP-SM administration. CONCLUSION: After high-dose inhaled corticosteroid, stepping down with the combination inhaler conferred further improvements in bronchoprotection, bronchodilatation, and clinical control, but not inflammatory markers, compared with that seen with a medium dose of inhaled corticosteroid.     

The effectiveness of high-dose inhaled budesonide therapy in the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations in children.

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend the use of systemic steroids for the treatment of acute asthma attack if it has not been resolved within 24 to 36 hours of home management with regular beta2 mimetic inhalation. Such therapy for infrequent exacerbations is unlikely to have serious systemic effects. Unfortunately, many patients receiving frequent courses are potentially at risk for corticosteroid-induced side effects such as adrenal suppression, depression of linear growth, and osteoporosis. OBJECTIVE: To decrease the use of frequent oral corticosteroid courses in children, this study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of high-dose inhaled steroids in comparison with oral steroids, in the therapy of acute asthma exacerbations in children. METHODS: Sixty children who have experienced an acute exacerbation of asthma unresponsive to home management with regular use of inhaled beta2 mimetics, yet not severe enough to hospitalize, were randomized to be treated with either high-dose inhaled budesonide (1,600 microg daily) or oral methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg daily) plus medium-dose inhaled budesonide (800 microg daily, both in addition to inhaled terbutaline, 2,000 microg daily). Pre- and posttreatment pulmonary index scores, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC and forced expiratory flow 25% to 75% (FEF25%-75%) were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean number of decrease in pulmonary index score was 2.61 +/- 1.12 in the high-dose budesonide-receiving group (group I) and 1.90 +/- 1.08 in the oral steroid-receiving group (group II). There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups, in favor of group I (P = .038). No statistically significant difference was detected between the two groups with respect to the increase in lung function test measurements (FEV1, FEV1/FVC, FEF25%-75%; P = .790, .959, .819, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term high-dose budesonide therapy can be considered an alternative for children who are experiencing an acute asthma attack that is unresponsive to home management with regular use of an inhaled beta2 mimetic, yet who are not severe enough to hospitalize.     

Direct clinician-to-patient feedback discussion of inhaled steroid use: its effect on adherence.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether direct feedback discussion on inhaled steroid use might influence subsequent adherence with this therapy. DESIGN AND SETTING: A 10-week, single-blind, randomized trial in asthma patients. Inclusion criteria included forced expiratory volume in 1 second <80%, one or more markers for low socioeconomic status, and the use of inhaled steroids. Inhaled steroid and beta-agonist use were electronically monitored. All patients received standard asthma care. The treatment group received direct clinician-to-patient feedback discussion on their inhaled steroid and beta-agonist use on all subsequent visits, whereas this information was withheld during the study period in the control group. MEASURES: 1) Mean weekly inhaled steroid adherence [(number of actuations/prescribed number of actuations) x 100]; 2) number of days with overuse of inhaled steroids; 3) 24-hour and nighttime albuterol use; 4) included forced expiratory volume in 1 second; and 5) Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire total score. RESULTS: Ten treatment and nine control patients completed the study. Mean weekly inhaled steroid adherence over the first week was not significantly different in the treatment and control groups: 61 +/- 9% versus 51 +/- 5%, respectively. However, by the second week, adherence increased to 81 +/- 7% in the treatment group, whereas it decreased to 47 +/- 7% in the control group (P = 0.003). Adherence remained above 70% in the treatment group for the entire trial, but continued to decrease in the control group. Overuse of inhaled steroids was low in both groups. There were no group differences in any of the asthma outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Direct clinician-to-patient feedback discussion on inhaled steroid use using electronic printouts did improve adherence in the short-term in asthma patients at high-risk for poor adherence.     

Omalizumab is effective in the long-term control of severe allergic asthma.

BACKGROUND: Previous reports show that addition of omalizumab to standard therapy reduces asthma exacerbations and simultaneously decreases use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and rescue medication in patients with allergic asthma. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of omalizumab on long-term disease control in patients with severe allergic asthma. METHODS: The present study concerns the 24-week, double-blind extension phase to a previous 28-week core study in which patients received subcutaneous omalizumab or matching placebo (at least 0.016 mg/kg/IgE [IU/mL] every 4 weeks) for 16 weeks in addition to their existing ICS therapy (beclomethasone dipropionate [BDP]; steroid-stable phase), followed by a 12-week phase in which controlled attempts were made to gradually reduce ICS therapy (steroid-reduction phase). During the extension phase patients were maintained on randomized treatment (omalizumab or placebo) and the lowest sustainable dose of BDP. The use of other asthma medications was permitted during the extension phase. Investigators were also allowed to switch patients from BDP to other ICS medications if considered necessary. RESULTS: A total of 460 patients (omalizumab, n = 245; placebo, n = 215) entered the extension phase. Overall, omalizumab-treated patients experienced significantly fewer exacerbations vs placebo during the extension phase (0.60 and 0.83 exacerbations per patient, respectively; P = 0.023), despite a sustained significant reduction in their use of ICS (mean BDP equivalent dose: omalizumab, 227 microg/d; placebo, 335 microg/d; P < 0.001). Treatment with omalizumab was well tolerated and the incidence of adverse events was similar in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that omalizumab is effective in the long-term control of severe allergic asthma.     

The Predicting Response to Inhaled Corticosteroid Efficacy (PRICE) trial

BACKGROUND: Although guidelines recommend anti-inflammatory therapy for persistent asthma, recent studies suggest that 25% to 35% of patients with asthma may not improve lung function with inhaled corticosteroids. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate potential biomarkers of predicting short-term (6-week) response to inhaled corticosteroid with subsequent evaluation of responders and nonresponders to asthma control over a longer interval (16 additional weeks). METHODS: Eighty-three subjects with asthma off steroid were enrolled in this multicenter study. Biomarkers and asthma characteristics were evaluated as predictors of inhaled corticosteroid response over a 6-week trial for changes in FEV(1) and methacholine PC(20). After this, an additional 4-month trial evaluated asthma control. RESULTS: Although multiple baseline predictors had significant correlations with improvements for short-term inhaled steroid success, the only strong correlations (r >or= +/- 0.6) were albuterol reversibility (r = 0.83; P < .001), FEV(1)/forced vital capacity (r = -0.75; P < .001), and FEV(1) % predicted (r = -0.71; P < .001). Dividing the subjects in the short-term inhaled steroid trial into responders (>5% FEV(1) improvement) and nonresponders (相似文献   

Addition of montelukast or salmeterol to fluticasone for protection against asthma attacks: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: For patients whose asthma is uncontrolled with low-dose inhaled corticosteroids, addition of alternative therapy instead of increasing the steroid dose is recommended by current treatment guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To compare montelukast, a once-daily leukotriene receptor antagonist, and salmeterol, a twice-daily, long-acting beta-agonist, concomitantly administered with inhaled fluticasone, according to the percentage of patients without an asthma attack for 1 year. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study was conducted. Adult patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma (ages 14-73 years) receiving inhaled fluticasone (220 microg/d) who remained symptomatic during a 4-week run-in period were randomized to the addition of salmeterol (84 microg/d) or montelukast (10 mg/d) for 48 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 1,473 randomized patients, 743 were randomized to montelukast and 730 to salmeterol; 1,059 patients completed the study. Eighty percent of patients in the montelukast group and 83.3% of patients in the salmeterol group remained attack free during the 48 weeks of treatment (relative risk, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-1.49). Montelukast significantly reduced blood eosinophil counts compared with salmeterol, whereas salmeterol significantly increased prealbuterol forced expiratory volume in 1 second, asthma-specific quality of life, morning peak expiratory flow rate, and decreased nocturnal awakenings compared with montelukast. Differences between treatments were small, and both treatments were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of montelukast or salmeterol to an inhaled corticosteroid similarly protected most patients from experiencing an asthma attack during a 1-year period, but, based on noninferiority limits, the study was inconclusive with regard to a difference between treatment groups.     

Long-term comparison of three combinations of albuterol, theophylline, and beclomethasone in children with chronic asthma.

Three combination regimens, (1) inhaled albuterol (ALB) with oral theophylline (THEO), (2) inhaled ALB with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), or (3) inhaled ALB, inhaled BDP, and oral THEO, were evaluated and compared as optimal pharmacotherapy for chronic asthma in 111 children. In this double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study, children, aged 6 to 16 years with moderately severe asthma (unstable despite daily medications), were treated with one of the combinations for 12 weeks. Patients were evaluated every 4 weeks by spirometry and serum THEO measurement. Patients kept daily symptom diaries, measured peak flow rates twice daily, and recorded adverse events. Treatment groups did not differ in disease or demographic characteristics at study entry. All three combination treatments provided and maintained significant improvement in FVC, FEV1, and FEF25%-75% volume points, and compared with that of pretreatment, with no significant differences between treatments. Throughout the 12-week treatment period, however, patients receiving BDP had lower symptom scores, fewer had more than one asthma attack, fewer required "bursts" of prednisone (p = 0.001), and fewer required rescue medication (p = 0.009). Significantly more patients receiving BDP said that they felt better than they did at the beginning of the study compared with the number of patients not receiving BDP (p = 0.002). Adverse events were similar among treatment groups.     

Steroid sparing effect of nedocromil sodium in asthmatic patients on high doses of inhaled steroids

Nedocromil sodium is a non-steroidal prophylactic agent developed for the management of asthma. We have assessed the steroid sparing potential of inhaled nedocromil sodium 4 mg four limes daily in a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study in 69 asthmatic subjects controlled on inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate in the dose range 1000 2000 μg daily. Following a 4 week run-in period subjects added nedocromil sodium or placebo by metered dose inhaler to their usual medication for a further 4 weeks. The dose of inhaled steroid was then reduced at fortnightly intervals according to a predetermined schedule, with monitoring of asthma severity, symptom scores, bronchodilator use and peak flow recordings. Sixty subjects entered the steroid reduction phase and achieved median (range) % decreases in steroid dose of 80 (17-100)% with nedocromil sodium compared to 65 (0-100)% with placebo (P = 0.34) with 14 patients in the nedocromil sodium group and 10 in the placebo group being withdrawn completely from inhaled steroids. Subjective global assessment scores were significantly better with nedocromil sodium (mean 2.14) than with placebo (2.93; P<0.02) though there was no difference between individual daily symptom scores. In this study therefore in asthmatic patients controlled on high doses of inhaled steroids, nedocromil sodium was well tolerated but the smalt differences in steroid sparing effect between nedocromil and placebo were not statistically significant.     

A new spacer, Babyhaler, for BDP inhalation therapy in severe infantile asthma]

Recently, it has been recognized that airway inflammation is the most important pathogenesis of bronchial asthma, and inhaled corticosteroids therapy is effective for childhood asthma. However, using metered dose inhalers (MDI) of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) is difficult for infants. In this study, we administered BDP inhalation therapy with a new spacer, Babyhaler, for five cases of early childhood with severe infantile asthma that we could not control even by combination of theophylline round the clock (RTC) therapy and disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) + beta 2 stimulant (beta 2) regular use. We compared symptom score of asthma attack between the pre-treatment period (prior 2 weeks) and post-treatment period (following 8 weeks) of BDP inhalation therapy with Babyhaler. As a result, symptom score decreased significantly within 4 weeks after treatment of BDP with Babyhaler as compared with the score before treatment of BDP. These findings suggest that Babyhaler is useful for BDP inhalation therapy in infantile asthma.     

The use of serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in the management of steroid therapy in chronic asthma

Background Corticosteroid therapy has become the mainstay in the treatment of asthma. However, the risk-benefit balance in the patient calls for assessment of the state of inflammation in the airways. In this respect serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) might be a marker, which can easily be measured in a clinical setting. Studies have indicated a relation between level of serum ECP and activity and severity in asthma. Objective To investigate the feasibility to guide steroid therapy on the basis of the level of serum ECP in patients with chronic asthma. Methods Twenty adult patients on maintenance inhaled steroid therapy visited the chest clinic once every 2 months over a 12-month period. At each visit a short history, blood sample for ECP and number of eosinophils, baseline spirometry, and histamine inhalation provocation test (PC₂₀) were obtained. On the basis of level of ECP, adjustments in daily dose of steroids were considered. Data were compared with those of a previous 6-month ECP evaluation study in these same patients. Results In 10 patients mean dose of inhaled steroids was decreased 25%. ECP rose slightly (antilogged mean from 9.06 to 11.8μg/L) and lung function decreased slightly (mean FEV₁%predicted from 85.5 to 81.6). In seven patients mean dose of inhaled or oral (n= 2) steroids was increased 25%. In this group ECP decreased but remained elevated at 20μg/L (antilogged mean from 30.5 to 25.6μg/L) and lung function improved (mean FEV₁%predicted from 67.2 to 74.5). In both groups patients' scores of asthmatic well-being increased significantly, and PC₂₀ did not show a trend. Exacerbation rate remained the same in the decreased and the no change group (n= 3, in which no substantial change in steroid dose occurred), but was reduced by about 50% in the increased group. Conclusion From this observational study it is concluded that adjusting steroid therapy guided by serum ECP-level may be helpful in tailoring asthma treatment.     

Cyclosporin for steroid-dependent asthma

We used cyclosporin to treat 12 adult patients with severe bronchial asthma who had been on systemic steroids for an average of 16 years. During the baseline period, lasting 4-6 months, therapy with high doses of inhaled beclamethasone, aminophylline and salbutamol was standardized and a minimum necessary dose of systemic steroids was established. After 9 months' treatment with low-dose cyclosporin (average whole-blood trough levels of 105 ng/ml), in six patients the daily dose of oral prednisone could be reduced from mean 30 mg to mean 11 mg, while daily symptom scores and peak expiratory flows improved significantly. This was accompanied by a reduction in exacerbations of asthma. However, in six other patients attempts to taper the steroid doses were unsuccessful, and cyclosporin was stopped after 4 to 7 months. These preliminary results suggest that cyclosporin might be of benefit in some patients with steroid-dependent asthma.     

Fluticasone propionate and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in childhood asthma.

Bronchial asthma is now agreed as being a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways. Inhaled steroids are widely accepted as a preventive medication in asthmatic patients of all ages and severity. However, the optimal use of inhaled steroids and the important issue of safety and efficacy still remain of concern, particularly in children. Recently, fluticasone propionate (FP) has been developed for use as an inhaled preparation for the treatment of asthma. Because of its high topical potency and increased lipophilicity, it is claimed that FP has an improved risk/benefit compared with other inhaled steroids. In order to evaluate the use of FP in children, we have studied the efficacy of high dose FP (500 microg/day) in asthmatic children. Thirteen children (9 boys and 4 girls), aged 7-17 years (10.8 +/- 2.6), were instructed to use a pressurized metered-dose inhaler connected to a Volumetric spacer. The standard methacholine bronchial challenge test was used as a principal outcome parameter. The PD20, a cumulative dose of methacholine inducing a 20% decrease in FEV1, was measured pre- and post-treatment with inhaled FP. After 4 weeks of FP, PD20 significantly increased from 21.6 +/- 14.3 inhalation unit to 106.6 +/- 78.5 inhalation unit (4.9 fold, p = 0.004) reflecting the improvement of airway reactivity. All subjects improved clinically. These results demonstrate that the anti-inflammatory action of FP 500 microg a day for four weeks can markedly reduce bronchial hyperresponsiveness, the basic physiologic abnormality in bronchial asthma.     

Mometasone furoate: efficacy and safety in moderate asthma compared with beclomethasone dipropionate.

BACKGROUND: Mometasone furoate (MF) is a new inhaled glucocorticoid administered by dry powder inhaler (DPI). OBJECTIVE: MF-DPI was evaluated for safety and efficacy and compared with placebo DPI and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) administered by metered dose inhaler (MDI) in the treatment of patients with moderate persistent asthma. METHODS: Eligible patients (n = 227), 13 to 75 years of age, maintained on inhaled glucocorticoids before entering the trial, were randomized to receive: MF-DPI, 100 microg, twice daily, MF-DPI, 200 microg, twice daily, BDP MDI, 168 microg, twice daily, or placebo in a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind study. RESULTS: At endpoint, FEV1 (primary efficacy variable) significantly improved for all three active treatments compared with placebo (P < .01, all comparisons). The response to MF-DPI, 200 microg, twice daily treatment was approximately twice as large as the response to MF-DPI, 100 microg, twice daily or BDP MDI treatment, although the differences between these groups did not reach statistical significance. Secondary efficacy variables including PEFR, asthma symptoms, nocturnal awakenings, and albuterol use showed similar trends. The MF-DPI, 100 microg, twice daily and BDP MDI, 168 microg, twice daily treatment groups produced comparable results for all efficacy variables. CONCLUSIONS: MF-DPI, 100 microg and 200 microg, twice daily were well-tolerated and significantly improved lung function and symptom control in the treatment of patients with moderate persistent asthma. In this study, MF-DPI, 200 microg, twice daily seemed to be the most effective dosage.     

Sodium cromoglycate as a replacement for inhaled corticosteroids in mild-to-moderate childhood asthma

We investigated whether sodium cromoglycate 10 mg three times daily, delivered as an aerosol via Nebuhaler (in addition to terbutaline 0.5 mg three times daily), could replace inhaled steroid in children with mild-to-moderate asthma. Children (mean age 10.3 years) were randomly allocated to 12-week treatment with sodium cromoglycate 10 mg plus terbutaline 0.5 mg (group A; n =30) or placebo plus terbutaline 0.5 mg (group B; n =32), both taken three times a day. The daily steroid dose was reduced by 50 μg/ week for 4 weeks from a starting dose of 200 μg. Fewer patients withdrew owing to worsening asthma from group A ( n =1) than group B ( n =11). Symptom scores, morning and evening peak flows, and additional β₂-agonist usage, recorded on diary cards, were better in group A than group B. Lung function measured at clinic visits was unchanged in either group. Overall opinions of efficacy favoured Group A. Adverse events were similar in the groups. Sodium cromoglycate plus terbutaline substituted effectively for inhaled steroid therapy.     

Efficacy response of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate in asthma is proportional to dose and is improved by formulation with a new propellant

BACKGROUND: This study tested the hypothesis that there would be improved asthma control with increasing doses of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) formulated in hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA-BDP) and the standard chlorofluorocarbon propellants (CFC-BDP). Because HFA-BDP has improved lung deposition compared with CFC-BDP, this study also tested the hypothesis that HFA-BDP would provide more effective control of asthma than CFC-BDP. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, parallel-group blinded study, asthmatic subjects who had deterioration in asthma control after discontinuation of inhaled corticosteroids were randomized to receive one of 6 possible treatments: 100 microg/d, 400 microg/d, or 800 microg/d of HFA-BDP or 100 microg/d, 400 microg/d, or 800 microg/d of CFC-BDP for 6 weeks. Changes in spirometry, daytime asthma symptom and nighttime asthma-related sleep disturbance scores, morning and evening peak expiratory flows, and daily use of inhaled beta-agonist for symptom control on diary cards were assessed over 6 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-three patients were randomized to the 6 treatment groups, which had similar demographics and baseline lung function. There were significantly larger changes from baseline at week 6 in FEV(1) percent predicted with increasing doses of both HFA-BDP and CFC-BDP. The FEV(1) percent predicted dose-response curve for HFA-BDP was shifted to the left compared with the dose-response curve for CFC-BDP. By using the Finney bioassay method, it was calculated that 2.6 times as much CFC-BDP would be required to achieve the same improvement in FEV(1) percent predicted as HFA-BDP (95% confidence interval, 1.1-11.6). All treatment groups except the 100 microg/d CFC-BDP group tolerated study drug well. Ten (17%) of 59 patients in this group reported an acute asthma episode, increased asthma symptoms (6 of the 8 reports of increased asthma symptoms were classified as severe), or both, and 8 patients withdrew from the study (3 for adverse events related to asthma). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing doses of inhaled corticosteroids lead to improved lung function and asthma control. Moreover, the reformulation of BDP in HFA enables effective asthma control at much lower doses than CFC-BDP.