Clozapine versus placebo in Huntington's disease: a double blind randomised comparative study

OBJECTIVES—To establish the effect of theatypical neuroleptic clozapine on chorea, voluntary motor performance,and functional disability in patients with Huntington's disease.
METHODS—Thirty three patients withHuntington's disease participated in a double blindrandomised trial. A maximum of 150 mg/day clozapine or placeboequivalent was given for a period of 31 days. Assessments wereperformed in the week before and at the last day of the trial. Choreawas scored using the abnormal involuntary movement scale (AIMS), thechorea score of the unified Huntington's disease rating scale (UHDRS),and judgement of video recordings. Voluntary motor performance wasassessed using the UHDRS motor scale. Patients and their partnerscompleted a questionnaire regarding functional disability. Twelvepatients already used other neuroleptic medication, which was keptunchanged during the trial period. Results of neuroleptic naive andneuroleptic treated patients were analysed separately.
RESULTS—Clozapine tended to reduce chorea inneuroleptic naive patients only (AIMS); improvement seemed morepronounced in patients receiving higher doses of clozapine. Othermeasures of chorea (UHDRS chorea score, video ratings) showed noimprovement. Clozapine had no beneficial effect on chorea in patientsalready receiving neuroleptic medication. Voluntary motor performancedid not improve with clozapine. Neuroleptic naive patients reportedaggravation of functional disability, possibly reflecting the frequentoccurrence of side effects. Adverse reactions forced trial terminationin six patients and dose reduction in another eight, and consisted mainly of drowsiness, fatigue, anticholinergic symptoms, and walking difficulties.
CONCLUSIONS—Clozapine has little beneficialeffect in patients withHuntington's disease, although individual patients may toleratedoses high enough to reduce chorea. Because adverse reactions are often encountered, clozapine should be used with restraint in this patient group.

     

Donepezil for dementia in Parkinson's disease: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study

OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and efficacy of a cholinesterase inhibitor, donepezil hydrochloride, for the treatment of dementia in Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: This was a randomised double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study in 22 subjects with PD and dementia. Participants were randomised to receive either donepezil followed by identical placebo, or placebo followed by donepezil. Donepezil was administered at 5-10 mg/day. Treatment periods were 10 weeks with a washout period of 6 weeks between the two periods. The primary outcome measure was the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscale (ADAScog). RESULTS: Donepezil was well tolerated and most adverse events were mild. There was no worsening of PD symptoms as measured by the total or motor sections of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale.There was a 1.9 point trend toward better scores on the ADAScog on treatment compared with placebo that was not statistically significant. The secondary cognitive measures showed a statistically significant 2 point benefit on the Mini Mental Status Examination and no change on the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS). The Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI) showed a significant 0.37 point improvement on donepezil. No improvement was observed on the MDRS or the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Carryover between treatment periods was observed but was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Donepezil was well tolerated and did not worsen PD. There may be a modest benefit on aspects of cognitive function. The possible clinical benefit measured by CGI was reflected in only one of the cognitive scales used in this study.     

Lavender oil as a treatment for agitated behaviour in severe dementia: a placebo controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether aromatherapy with lavender oil is effective in the treatment of agitated behaviour in patients with severe dementia. DESIGN: A placebo controlled trial with blinded observer rater. SETTING: A long-stay psychogeriatric ward. PATIENTS: Fifteen patients meeting ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for severe dementia and suffering from agitated behaviour defined as a minimum score of three points on the Pittsburgh Agitation Scale (PAS). INTERVENTION: A 2% lavender oil aromatherapy stream was administered on the ward for a two hour period alternated with placebo (water) every other day for a total of ten treatment sessions. ASSESSMENTS: For each subject 10 total PAS scores were obtained. Five during treatment and five during placebo periods. RESULTS: Nine patients (60%) showed an improvement, five (33%) showed no change and one patient (7%) showed a worsening of agitated behaviour during aromatherapy compared with placebo. A comparison of the group median PAS scores during aromatherapy showed a significant improvement in agitated behaviour during aromatherapy compared with placebo (median PAS scores 3 c.f. 4; Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test p = 0.016 (one-tailed)). CONCLUSIONS: Lavender oil administered in an aroma stream shows modest efficacy in the treatment of agitated behaviour in patients with severe dementia.     

Melissa officinalis extract in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: a double blind,randomised, placebo controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of Melissa officinalis extract using a fixed dose (60 drops/day) in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. DESIGN: A four month, parallel group, placebo controlled trial undertaken in three centres in Tehran, Iran. METHODS: Patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease aged between 65 and 80 years (n = 42; 18 women, 24 men) with a score of >or= 12 on the cognitive subscale of Alzheimer's disease assessment scale (ADAS-cog) and 相似文献   

Pramipexole in patients with Parkinson's disease and marked drug resistant tremor: a randomised,double blind,placebo controlled multicentre study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the tremorlytic properties of pramipexole, a non-ergoline dopamine agonist to those of placebo as add on medication in patients with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: Eighty four patients with early or advanced Parkinson's disease and marked, drug resistant tremor under a stable and optimised antiparkinsonian medication were included in a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, multicentre study and assigned to add on treatment (7 week dose titration interval, 4 week maintenance period) with either pramipexole (n=44) or placebo (n=40) as adjunct. The primary end point was the absolute change in tremor score, defined as the sum of tremor related items (16, 20, 21) of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) in "on" periods. Secondary end points included the percentage change in tremor score, the absolute and percentage changes in long term EMG tremor registration, and the change in tremor self rating scales. Safety and tolerability were assessed on the basis of adverse events, laboratory tests, ECG, and vital signs. RESULTS: Pramipexole was significantly superior to placebo with a difference between treatment groups in the mean absolute change in tremor score of -4.4 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) -6.2 to -2.5) (p<0.0001), corresponding to a difference in the mean percentage change of -34.7% in favour of pramipexole. The secondary end points were consistent with the significant change in tremor score and provided further evidence for the benefit of pramipexole compared with placebo. Long term EMG registration as an objective measure showed a difference in mean absolute change in tremor occurrence of -15.2% (95%CI -21.4 to -9.0) (p<0.0001), and a difference in the mean percentage change of -45.7% in favour of pramipexole. The treatment effects increased during dose titration and remained stable during the 4 week maintenance dose period until the end of the study. The average daily pramipexole dose during maintenance was 4.1 (SD 0.9) mg. Safety analysis showed an increased rate of fatigue, insomnia, nausea, abdominal pain, and headache under pramipexole, comparable with previous studies. CONCLUSION: Pramipexole proved to be an effective agent for patients with Parkinson's disease and drug resistant tremor.     

Entacapone is beneficial in both fluctuating and non-fluctuating patients with Parkinson's disease: a randomised,placebo controlled,double blind,six month study

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of entacapone, a specific peripherally acting catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor used in combination with levodopa treatment, in cases of Parkinson's disease with both fluctuating and non-fluctuating response to treatment. METHODS: A randomised, placebo controlled, double blind, six month study was undertaken in 172 fluctuating and 128 non-fluctuating patients. The clinical efficacy and safety of 200 mg entacapone given with each daily levodopa dose was studied. Efficacy was examined using home diaries, the unified Parkinson disease rating scale (UPDRS), and recording of daily levodopa dose. RESULTS: The primary efficacy variable for fluctuating patients-the proportion of daily ON time-showed a significant increase compared with placebo (p < 0.05). The absolute ON time (mean (SD)) increased from 9.5 (2.5) to 10.8 (2.4) hours (p < 0.01), and the daily OFF time was correspondingly reduced from 7.0 (2.6) to 5.9 (2.5) hours (p < 0.05 v placebo). This improvement was achieved despite a reduction in daily levodopa requirements. The effect was rapidly lost on withdrawal of entacapone. In non-fluctuating patients, the primary efficacy measure was part II of the UPDRS (activities of daily living; ADL). In this group of patients, ADL scores improved in the entacapone group (p < 0.01 v placebo), and there was also a 40 mg reduction in levodopa requirement (p < 0.01 v placebo). Entacapone was well tolerated by both fluctuating and non-fluctuating patients. CONCLUSIONS: The ability of entacapone to provide additional benefits to levodopa treatment in increasing ON time in fluctuating Parkinson's disease patients was confirmed. A novel finding was that patients without fluctuations also obtained benefit from the addition of entacapone to their levodopa treatment, as evidenced by improved ADL scores and a relatively reduced levodopa requirement.     

Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on chronic tinnitus: a randomised, crossover, double blind, placebo controlled study

Background

Chronic tinnitus is a disabling, almost untreatable, condition, usually accompanied by psychiatric distress. In patients with complex neuropsychiatric diseases, such as chronic pain, with which tinnitus shares pathophysiological similarities, placebo effects may be pronounced. Moreover, it may be difficult to distinguish actual repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) induced clinical benefits beyond placebo effects in neuropsychiatric patients.

Methods

16 patients with chronic tinnitus underwent a randomised, double blind, crossover, placebo controlled trial of 1 Hz rTMS (120% of motor threshold; 1200 stimuli/day for 5 days) of the left temporoparietal region. Patients were screened for psychiatric comorbidity; additionally, anxiety and depression were monitored throughout the study. Moreover, an original placebo rTMS procedure produced the same activation of ipsilateral face muscles (a condition which may per se change the subjective rating of tinnitus) as the real rTMS.

Results

There were 8 out of 14 responders. Two patients dropped out for transient worsening of tinnitus. Active rTMS induced an overall significant, but transient, improvement (35% of the basal score) of subjective tinnitus perception that was independent of either tinnitus laterality or mood or anxiety changes. No correlations were found between response to rTMS and tinnitus duration, initial subjective score or patient age. When asked after the study was over, 71.4% of patients failed to identify the temporal sequence of the real or sham rTMS interventions.

Conclusion

The beneficial effects of rTMS on tinnitus are independent of mood changes. Moreover, they appear in the context of an original placebo stimulation designed to more closely replicate the somatic sensation of active stimulation. Because of the limited temporal duration of the clinical benefit, these neuromodulatory effects could be mediated by transient functional changes taking place in the neural circuits underlying tinnitus processing.Tinnitus is a subjective auditory perception of sounds or noise, not triggered by external auditory stimuli, which affects millions of people.¹ It is estimated that in 1–3% of the general population tinnitus becomes chronic and sufficiently intrusive to interfere with the patient''s quality of life, mainly because of psychiatric distress, including sleep disturbances, thereby leading to work impairment.² Pharmacological and physical/behavioural treatments in severe cases are generally unsatisfactory.³Experimental data based on transection of⁴ or drug effects on⁵ the cochlear nerve, and in vivo human brain imaging studies,^6,7,8 converge in suggesting that tinnitus could be associated with maladaptive plastic brain reorganisations, taking place at multiple brain levels following—and thereafter being maintained independently by—an initial cochlear dysfunction.⁹ Functional brain changes associated with tinnitus showed hyperactivity of discrete temporoparietal regions, including both the primary auditory cortex (AC)^10,11,12,13 and the secondary, or associative, AC.^{7,11,14,15,16,17,18} More comprehensive views on the generation and maintenance of tinnitus indicate involvement of a broader neural network, most likely including the primary and associative AC (although it is difficult to disentangle the relative contribution of these two areas by positron emission tomography (PET) scans¹⁹), part of the limbic system,¹⁷ the anterior cingulated cortex¹⁸ and higher order processing areas.^20,21More direct evidence for the key role played by the AC in the perception/elaboration of tinnitus comes from studies with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a technique that transiently modulates/disrupts the brain function of the targeted area(s) in several perceptive, motor and cognitive domains²²: high‐frequency rTMS (ie, 10 Hz or more for 2 s or less) applied on the scalp overlying the hyperactive left AC produced an intense, short lived tinnitus attenuation (see table 1​1).^16,12,23,24 Although these studies were not designed to “treat” tinnitus, they demonstrate that the AC is definitely involved in the expression of tinnitus. Interestingly, high frequency rTMS has been applied successfully to produce transient clinical benefits in other deafferentation induced disorders, such as chronic neurogenic pain,^25,26 which shares pathophysiological similarities with tinnitus in terms of maladaptive plastic changes at the cortical level.²⁷Table 1 Full papers on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation studies (single case reports are not considered) in chronic tinnitus

Pen injected apomorphine against off phenomena in late Parkinson''s disease: a double blind, placebo controlled study.

The effect, therapeutic dose range, and pharmacokinetics of apomorphine, given as subcutaneous injections by a single use pen, were evaluated in the treatment of off phenomena in 22 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. At study entry a placebo controlled apomorphine test was performed, and apomorphine doses were then individually titrated (mean 3.4 (range 0.8-6.0) mg) and compared with placebo in a double blind cross over phase. With apomorphine compared with placebo the mean daily duration of off periods was reduced by 51% as assessed by the patients and by 58% as assessed by the staff. The severity of off periods was also significantly reduced. The effect was unchanged after a maintenance phase of eight weeks. At study termination 13 of 14 patients were able to inject themselves and 11 of 14 patients found that their feeling of freedom had increased. The most common adverse events were nausea, subcutaneous nodules, and increased frequency of involuntary movements. Pharmacokinetics were linear and did not change with repeat dosing. The tmax ranged from five to 45 minutes (16 patients). It is concluded that pen injected apomorphine is a valuable treatment for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease with on-off phenomena.     

Amantadine for treatment of fatigue in Guillain-Barre syndrome: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover trial

OBJECTIVE: Fatigue is a major complaint in patients with immune mediated polyneuropathies. Despite apparently good physical recovery after Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), many patients remain restricted in daily and social activities, and have a decreased quality of life. In this trial, the effect of amantadine on severe fatigue related to GBS was studied. METHODS: During the pre-treatment phase, all patients were monitored for 2 weeks. Only patients with severe fatigue, defined as a mean fatigue score of > or = 5.0 on the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), were randomised for this double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study. Primary outcome measure was improvement of at least 1 point on the FSS. Secondary outcome measures were impact of fatigue, anxiety and depression, handicap, and quality of life. RESULTS: In total, 80 patients with GBS were randomised, of whom 74 were included for analysis. Fatigue appeared to be reduced already during the pre-treatment phase (p = 0.05), probably due to increased attention provided to the patients. No significant differences in any of the primary and secondary outcome measures were found. CONCLUSIONS: Amantadine was not superior to placebo. Because fatigue remains a serious complaint, other studies evaluating new treatment options are strongly recommended.     

Modafinil for daytime somnolence in Parkinson's disease: double blind, placebo controlled parallel trial

BACKGROUND: Excessive daytime somnolence (EDS) commonly complicates Parkinson's disease (PD). The aetiology of EDS is probably multifactorial but is probably exacerbated by dopaminergic medications. Modafinil is a wake-promoting agent approved for use in narcolepsy, but it is often used to treat a variety of somnolent conditions. METHOD: A double blind, placebo controlled parallel design trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of modafinil (200-400 mg/day) for the treatment of EDS in PD. The primary efficacy measure was the Epworth Sleepiness (ES) scale score. Secondary efficacy points included the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), the Fatigue Severity Scale, the Hamilton Depression Scale, and the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT). RESULTS: Of a total of 40 subjects (29 men, mean (SD) age 64.8 (11.3) years), randomised to modafinil or placebo, 37 completed the study. Modafinil failed to significantly improve ES scores compared with placebo (2.7 v 1.5 points improvement, respectively, p = 0.28). MSLT failed to improve with modafinil relative to placebo (-0.16 v -0.70, respectively, p = 0.14). UPDRS, global impressions, Fatigue Severity Scale, and Hamilton Depression Scale scores were unchanged. Adverse events were minimal. CONCLUSION: Modafinil failed to significantly improve EDS in PD compared with placebo. The drug did not alter motor symptoms in PD and was well tolerated.     

Gabapentin and cognition: a double blind, dose ranging, placebo controlled study in refractory epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of different doses of gabapentin (GBP) on cognitive function in treated epileptic patients. METHODS: Twenty seven patients with refractory partial seizures commenced a double blind, dose ranging, placebo controlled, crossover study of adjuvant GBP. Each treatment phase lasted three months, during which the dose of GBP or matched placebo was increased stepwise at intervals of four weeks (1200 mg/day, 1800 mg/day, and 2400 mg/day in three daily doses). Psychomotor and memory testing was carried out at the end of each four week period, at which time the patient also completed subjective measures of cognition, fatigue, worry, temper, and dysphoria. A visual analogue scale was used to assess drowsiness and a questionnaire was employed to gauge the severity of side effects. RESULTS: In the 21 patients completing the study, GBP produced a significant reduction in median monthly seizure frequency from 7 to 4.3 (P = 0.02), the decrease being most pronounced for secondarily generalised seizures (from 1.0 to 0.3, P = 0.01). Forty three per cent of patients reported a reduction in seizure frequency of at least 50% throughout all GBP doses. Mean (SD) plasma concentrations of GBP at 1200, 1800, and 2400 mg/day were 4.7 (2.6), 6.8 (3.8), and 8.6 (3.3) mg/l respectively. The drug had no effect on composite psychomotor and memory scores; nor was there alteration in any self assessment subscore. The mean drowsiness (P = 0.03) score was higher during treatment with 2400 mg GBP daily compared with matched placebo. Composite psychomotor (r = -0.47, P < 0.01), tiredness (r = 0.42, P < 0.01), and side effect (r = 0.61, P < 0.001) scores correlated significantly with seizure frequency but not with GBP dose. CONCLUSION: GBP is a well tolerated and effective antiepileptic drug which had no measurable effect on cognition but did produce sedation at the highest dose. This study also supports the suggestion that seizures can cause cognitive impairment.     

Added ondansetron for stable schizophrenia: a double blind, placebo controlled trial

It is well documented that 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (5-HT3) receptors are involved in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia and cognitive impairment. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of ondansetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist as an adjuvant agent in the treatment of chronic schizophrenia in particular for cognitive impairments. This investigation was a 12-week, double blind study of parallel groups of patients with stable chronic schizophrenia. Thirty patients were recruited from inpatient and outpatient departments. All participants met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for schizophrenia. To be eligible, patients were required to have been treated with a stable dose of risperidone as their primary antipsychotic treatment for a minimum period of 8 weeks. The subjects were randomized to receive ondansetron (8 mg/day) or the placebo in addition to risperidone. Clinical psychopathology was assessed with Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Cognition was measured by a cognitive battery. Patients were assessed at baseline and after 8, and 12 weeks after the medication started. The PANSS scores and cognitive performance were used as the outcome measures. The ondansetron group had significantly greater improvement in the negative symptoms, general psychopathological symptoms and PANSS total scores over the trial. Administration of ondansetron significantly improved visual memory based on improvement on visual reproduction, visual paired associate and figural memory sub tests of Wechsler Memory Scale--Revised. The present study indicates ondansetron as potential adjunctive treatment strategy for chronic schizophrenia particularly for negative symptoms and cognitive impairments.     

Efficacy of rivastigmine in subjects with moderately severe Alzheimer's disease

BACKGROUND: Cholinesterase (ChE) inhibitors are primarily used in the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD), but may also be effective in more severe disease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dual ChE inhibitor, rivastigmine, in more severe dementia. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed pooled data from three randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 6-month trials, involving 2126 AD subjects. Subjects were selected according to baseline Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score to identify subjects with more severe cognitive impairment (10-12 MMSE points). One-hundred-and-seventeen subjects were included who had been treated with rivastigmine 6-12 mg/day or placebo. The AD Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), the MMSE, a six-item subscore of the Progressive Deterioration Scale (PDS) and the BEHAVE-AD assessed efficacy. Tolerability was assessed by recording adverse events (AEs) and the relative risk (RR) of discontinuation. RESULTS: This group of subjects responded well to rivastigmine. After 6 months, the mean ADAS-Cog score declined by 6.3 points in the placebo group and increased by 0.2 points in the rivastigmine group (observed cases; p<0.001). Clinical benefits were also observed with the MMSE, the six-item PDS score and items of the BEHAVE-AD. Rivastigmine showed the same pattern of AEs as in other studies, but the RR of dropping out due to AEs was lower than in subjects with milder AD. CONCLUSION: Current treatment guidelines do not recommend treating individuals with severe AD with ChE inhibitors. However, this retrospective analysis suggests that rivastigmine 6-12 mg/day may benefit subjects with more severe disease, as well as subjects with mild to moderate impairment.     

A randomised placebo controlled study to assess the effects of cholinergic treatment on muscarinic receptors in Alzheimer's disease

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of cholinergic treatment on the muscarinic receptor in patients with Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: 12 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease and six controls were studied. The patients underwent ADAS-COG psychometric assessment and SPECT brain imaging with (123)I quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB), to demonstrate the postsynaptic muscarinic M1 receptor, before being randomised in a double blind study to receive either an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (donepezil) or placebo for four months. Following this, the ADAS-COG and the (123)I-QNB receptor scan were repeated. The controls were imaged on one occasion only. All image analyses were undertaken using SPM99. RESULTS: (123)I-QNB imaging showed a significant relation between baseline psychometric impairment and deficits on scanning. Both placebo and actively treated groups had reductions in (123)I-QNB uptake. Greater reductions in receptor binding were demonstrated in the placebo group than in those receiving active treatment. Intraindividual reproducibility of the (123)I-QNB imaging technique appeared highly robust. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that (123)I-QNB uptake is better preserved in Alzheimer's disease patients on cholinergic treatment than on placebo. Cholinergic treatment may play a neuroprotective role. Sequential (123)I-QNB imaging seems to be a powerful tool in monitoring the response of these receptors to disease modifying treatments.     

Efficacy, safety, and tolerance of the non-ergoline dopamine agonist pramipexole in the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease: a double blind, placebo controlled, randomised, multicentre study

OBJECTIVES: Pramipexole, a non-ergot dopamine D2/D3 receptor agonist, was investigated as an add on drug in advanced parkinsonian patients with motor fluctuations to assess efficacy, safety, and tolerance. METHODS: Seventy eight patients of either sex with advanced Parkinson's disease and treatment complications such as motor fluctuations were enrolled into a double blind, placebo controlled, randomised, multicentre study (phase II) and assigned to add on treatment with pramipexole (n=34) versus placebo (n=44) to a previously stabilised antiparkinsonian medication (7 week dose titration interval, 4 week maintenance period). The primary end point of efficacy was the change from baseline in the total score of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) in the on "period" (2 hours after intake of study medication). Safety and tolerability were assessed on the basis of adverse events, vital signs, laboratory measurements, and ECG recordings. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement of the pramipexole group in UPDRS total scores, subscores part II, III (activities of daily living and motor examination), and IV (complications of therapy). Mean UPDRS total score decreased by 37.3% under pramipexole compared with 12.2% under placebo (p<0.001). Patients under pramipexole reported an overall reduction in "off" periods of 12%--resulting in 1.7 more hours "on" time a day--compared with an increase in "off" periods of 2% under placebo. There were no unexpected safety results. The adverse event profile disclosed a high tolerability. The most important adverse events under pramipexole were fatigue, dyskinesia, and vivid dreams. CONCLUSION: Pramipexole administration is an efficacious and well tolerated add on therapy in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease with an improvement in activities of daily living, motor function, and treatment associated complications.     

Vitamin D supplementation in bipolar depression: A double blind placebo controlled trial

ObjectiveBipolar depression is difficult to treat. Vitamin D supplementation is well tolerated and may improve mood via its neurotransmitter synthesis regulation, nerve growth factor enhancement and antioxidant properties. Vitamin D adjunct reduces unipolar depression, but has not been tried in bipolar depression.Methods18-70yos with DSM IV bipolar depression and Vitamin D deficiency (<30 ng/ml) were randomized in a controlled double blind trial of 5000IU Vitamin D₃ po qday supplementation versus placebo for twelve weeks. Change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), medication, and tolerance were assessed q2weeks.Results16 VitD vs 17 placebo subjects did not differ in baseline characteristics (mean = 44 yo, SD = 13), VitD level (19.2 ± 65.8  g/ml vs 19.3 ± 5.5 ng/ml respectively) or mood ratings (MADRS 21.3 ± 6.4 vs 22.8 ± 6.9 respectively). At 12wks, the placebo group VitD levels remained unchanged, while the VitD group levels increased to 28 ng/ml. MADRS score decreased significantly in both placebo (mean = 6.42 (95% CI [2.28 to 10.56]) and VitD groups (mean = 9.54 (95% CI[3.51 to 15.56]) (p = 0.031), but there were no differences between treatment groups (time by treatment interaction estimate: 0.29, t₍₂₃₎ = 0.14, p = 0.89); VitD and placebo groups had similar reductions in YMRS and HAM-A. Vitamin D₃ was well tolerated.ConclusionsIn this small study, despite a greater rise in Vitamin D levels in the VitD supplementation group, there was no significant difference reduction in depressive symptoms. However both groups’ VitD levels remained deficient. Vitamin D₃ supplementation vs placebo did not improve reduction in mood elevation or anxiety symptoms.     

Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: a double blind, placebo controlled study.

Patients with a clinical diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) were randomised in a double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial to investigate whether high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin treatment (IVIg) for 5 consecutive days has a beneficial effect. Fifteen patients were randomised to IVIg and 13 to placebo. In the IVIg treatment group 4 patients improved and 3 patients in the placebo group. The degree of improvement of the patients in the IVIg treatment group was no different from the patients in the placebo group. Electrophysiological studies did not show significant differences between the groups. Since a previously performed cross-over trial showed that a selected group of CIDP patients responded better to IVIg than to placebo, it is concluded that we need better criteria to select CIDP patients for treatment with IVIg.     

Intravenous flumazenil for Parkinson's disease: a single dose, double blind, placebo controlled, cross-over trial.

Flumazenil is a short-acting intravenously administered gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) antagonist used to reverse the effects of benzodiazepines. Based upon current basal ganglion models in Parkinson's disease (PD), flumazenil could normalize neuronal signaling at several different locations. We conducted a double-blind, placebo controlled, single dose, cross-over trial of flumazenil and placebo in 16 subjects with PD. Subjects were primarily assessed with serial tapping tests (1 minute for each hand) at 15-minute intervals for 90 minutes after infusion. Secondary assessments included the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Motor part at baseline and 45 minutes after infusion, and global impressions. Subjects then underwent a 90-minute washout and entered the opposite arm of the cross-over. Change in tapping speed compared to baseline improved throughout the 90-minute period (P < 0.0001) and at each individual time (P < 0.01), except for 15 minutes status after infusion, with flumazenil compared to placebo. UPDRS scores tended to improve more on drug, but this finding was not significant. The medication was well tolerated. The most common adverse event on drug was a sense of "light-headedness" or "dizziness." GABA antagonists represent a novel potential treatment class for PD.