Sodium cromoglycate and ipratropium bromide in exercise-induced asthma.

In thirteen patients with extrinsic asthma the effects of placebo, sodium cromoglycate, ipratropium bromide, and ipratropium bromide plus sodium cromoglycate were studied in a random double-blind fashion to assess their inhibitory action in exercise-induced asthma (EIA). Exercise testing consisted of steady state running on an inclined treadmill for up to eight minutes. In eight of the 13 patients studied the baseline ratio of expiratory flow at 50% vital capacity (VC) breathing helium-oxygen (V50He) to V50air was over 1.20 and they were called responders; the remaining five patients were called non-responders. There was a significantly lower baseline maximum mid-expiratory flow rate (MMEF) in non-responders (P less than 0.02) as compared to responders but no difference in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) or forced vital capacity (FVC). Sodium cromoglycate (P less than 0.02), ipratropium bromide (P less than 0.01), and ipratropium bromide plus spdium cromoglycate (P less than 0.01) all significantly inhibited the percentage fall in FEV1 after exercise in the responders. Ipratropium bromide had no preventive action on non-responders, unlike sodium cromoglycate (P less than 0.05) and ipratropium bromide plus sodium cromoglycate (P less than 0.02). It is postulated that mediator release is an important factor in development of EIA in most extrinsic asthmatics, whereas cholinergic mechanisms are relevant only in those patients in whom the main site of airflow obstruction is in the large central airways.     

Assessment of the clinical usefulness of nebulised ipratropium bromide in patients with chronic airflow limitation.

The effect of adding nebulised ipratropium bromide to bronchodilator treatment was studied in 20 patients with severe chronic airflow limitation. Maintenance theophylline with or without a steroid preparation was continued and comparison made between placebo, nebulised salbutamol, and a combination of nebulised salbutamol and ipratropium. Although the mean FEV1 values showed the combination to produce a small but significant increase in peak bronchodilatation over the effect of salbutamol alone, there were eight patients in whom no clinically useful improvement occurred. The remaining 12 patients did obtain clinically useful improvement in the magnitude or the duration of bronchodilatation (or both) as a result of the added ipratropium. The conclusion is that individual patients with chronic airflow limitation responded to the addition of nebulised ipratropium bromide in a variable way. Patients who could obtain additional benefit from ipratropium need to be identified by an appropriate reversibility study before its inclusion in their bronchodilator treatment.     

Bronchial responsiveness to hyperventilation in children with asthma: inhibition by ipratropium bromide.

Isocapnic hyperventilation dose response curves were constructed for 11 asthmatic children before and after pretreatment with placebo or ipratropium bromide, 40-1500 micrograms given by inhalation, on three separate days. The response before and after placebo was highly reproducible (within subject coefficient of variation 7.5%, 18%, and 22% for intervals of two hours, within two weeks, and over two weeks). It was independent of baseline lung function. Complete protection against hyperventilation induced asthma was achieved by ipratropium bromide 40 micrograms in six children and by 200 micrograms or more in a further four. The remaining child was unaffected by any dose of ipratropium up to 1500 micrograms. The dose of ipratropium required for protection was better related to the subjects' requirement for regular medication than to their sensitivity to hyperventilation or baseline lung function.     

Effect of oral prednisolone on response to salbutamol and ipratropium bromide aerosols in patients with chronic airflow obstruction.

We examined the bronchodilator responses to inhalation of salbutamol (200 micrograms) and of ipratropium bromide (40 micrograms) in the morning and in the afternoon before and during a course of oral prednisolone (40 mg daily) in 15 patients with chronic, partly reversible airflow obstruction. Bronchodilatation was assessed by measuring serial peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) for six hours after aerosol drug administration and calculating the area under the time-response curves. Eleven patients were found to be corticosteroid resistant in not attaining a baseline bronchodilatation of at least 25% during corticosteroid treatment. These patients also failed to show any enhancement of their bronchodilator responses to either salbutamol or ipratropium bromide during prednisolone administration. We therefore conclude that there is no rationale for giving or continuing corticosteroid treatment in known steroid-resistant patients in the hope of nevertheless potentiating their bronchodilator responses to salbutamol or ipratropium bromide.     

Relative efficacy of nebulised ipratropium bromide and fenoterol in acute severe asthma

In a double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial of 145 patients with acute asthma, the efficacy of nebulised 4-hourly ipratropium bromide plus 4-hourly fenoterol (group I, 50 patients), 2-hourly fenoterol (group II, 50 patients) and 4-hourly fenoterol (group III, 45 patients) was assessed. All patients received an optimal infusion of aminophylline and 81 patients (27 in each group) received hydrocortisone for clinical indications. It was found that cholinergic side-effects in group I were not more common than in group II. Tremor was more common in group II. Assessment of bronchodilator efficacy was confined to the 81 patients whose therapy included hydrocortisone. Peak expiratory flow rate, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and forced vital capacity were expressed as a percentage of predicted for each individual and the mean values for each group plotted. It was found that the response rate, as assessed by the area under the curve, was significantly more rapid in group I compared with both group II (P less than 0.001) and group III (P less than 0.005). These findings were consistent for all three lung function measurements. However, there was no significant difference in the responses between group II and group III. It is concluded that adding ipratropium bromide to conventional regimens is likely to benefit patients with acute asthma.     

Dose related effects of salbutamol and ipratropium bromide on airway calibre and reactivity in subjects with asthma.

The relationship between change in airway calibre and change in airway reactivity after administration of bronchodilator drugs has been investigated by comparing the effect of increasing doses of inhaled salbutamol and ipratropium bromide on the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), specific airways conductance (sGaw), and the dose of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20) in six subjects with mild asthma. On each of 10 occasions measurements were made of baseline FEV1, sGaw, and PD20 after 15 minutes' rest, and followed one hour later, when the FEV1 had returned to baseline, by a single nebulised dose of salbutamol (placebo, 5, 30, 200 and 1000 micrograms) or ipratropium (placebo, 5, 30, 200 and 1000 micrograms) given in random order. Measurements of FEV1, sGaw, and PD20 were repeated 15 minutes after salbutamol and 40 minutes after ipratropium. Salbutamol and ipratropium caused a similar dose related increase in FEV1 and sGaw, with a mean increase after the highest doses of 0.76 and 0.69 litres for FEV1 and 1.15 and 0.96 s-1 kPa-1 for sGaw. Salbutamol also caused a dose related increase in PD20 to a maximum of 2.87 (95% confidence interval 2.18-3.55) doubling doses of histamine after the 1000 micrograms dose, but ipratropium bromide caused no significant change in PD20 (maximum increase 0.24 doubling doses, 95% confidence interval -0.73 to 1.22). Thus bronchodilatation after salbutamol was associated with a significantly greater change in airway reactivity than a similar amount of bronchodilatation after ipratropium bromide. This study shows that the relation between change in airway reactivity and bronchodilatation is different for two drugs with different mechanisms of action, suggesting that change in airway calibre is not a major determinant of change in airway reactivity with bronchodilator drugs.     

Influence of age on response to ipratropium and salbutamol in asthma.

We studied the differential response to inhaled salbutamol and ipratropium of 29 asthmatic patients, 18 intrinsic, 11 extrinsic, using peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and forced vital capacity (FVC). Thirty minutes after a theoretically maximally bronchodilating dose of salbutamol (400 microgram) or ipratropium (80 microgram), second doses frequently caused further bronchodilatation. We suspect that second doses may reach bronchi untouched by the first inhalation. Analysis of variance showed a powerful intrinsic versus extrinsic effect, and there were clearly differences between patients in their response to treatment (patient versus drug interaction) but these differences were not removed by dividing the patients into intrinsic and extrinsic groups. Results for the group as a whole favoured salbutamol, but examination of individual results by a pattern-recognition technique showed ipratropium equally effective in eight patients and more effective in three. All patients with a definite predominant salbutamol response were less than 40 years old. The response to salbutamol declined significantly with age, whereas that to ipratropium did not. In general in patients aged less than 40 years salbutamol is the drug of choice. With advancing age, and the apparent decline of beta-adrenergic responsiveness, the initially comparatively small response to ipratropium becomes relatively more important and may predominate. In older patients ipratropium, or continued therapy with both drugs, may be preferable.     

Failure of ipratropium bromide to modify the diurnal variation of asthma in asthmatic children.

Thirty one children with asthma were given 40 micrograms of ipratropium bromide and identical placebo by inhalation three times a day in a double blind, randomised crossover study to test the ability of an anticholinergic drug to modify the diurnal variation in airway calibre and bronchial reactivity. Subjects measured peak expiratory flow rate approximately eight hourly, before and after inhaled salbutamol, for four week periods. Paired t tests and cosinor analysis were used to assess the diurnal variation in airway calibre from the peak expiratory flow rate recorded before salbutamol and to assess the diurnal variation in bronchodilator responsiveness from the increase in peak expiratory flow rate after salbutamol. Maintenance treatment with ipratropium bromide 40 micrograms three times daily reduced the provocative dose of histamine which caused a 20% fall in FEV1 (geometric mean PD20 = 0.78 v 0.49 mg/ml, p less than 0.05), despite an eight to 12 hour gap between the last dose of ipratropium and histamine challenge. It did not, however, diminish the diurnal variation in airway calibre (mean amplitude = 12.7 v 10.1) or in bronchodilator responsiveness (mean amplitude = 62.4 v 63.5). There was no improvement in the clinical state of subjects while they were taking ipratropium bromide.     

Effect of lignocaine, sodium cromoglycate, and ipratropium bromide in exercise-induced asthma

Eight patients with exercise-induced asthma participated in a single-blind trial comparing the protective effects of inhaled lignocaine (estimated dose 48 mg), sodium cromoglycate (estimated dose 12 mg), and ipratropium bromide (estimated dose 120 μg). Saline was used as control. Effects were assessed from the mean maximal percentage fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) and maximal mid-expiratory flow rates (MMFR) after they had run on a treadmill for eight minutes. There was no significant change in baseline FEV₁ or MMFR before each agent was given. Saline, lignocaine, and sodium cromoglycate did not alter the mean baseline FEV₁ or MMFR significantly. Ipratropium caused bronchodilatation with an increase of 16·3% in the mean FEV₁ (p<0·001) and of 43·4% in the mean MMFR (p<0·05). After exercise the maximal percentage falls in FEV₁ (means and SEM) after saline, lignocaine, sodium cromoglycate, and ipratropium bromide were 38·1% (5·0), 34·5% (6·1), 11·3% (3·7), and 19·3% (7·4) respectively. Similarly, the mean maximal falls in MMFR after saline, lignocaine, sodium cromoglycate, and ipratropium bromide were 54·4% (5·2), 52·9% (7·7), 23·6% (6·6), and 32·1% (10·5) respectively. The inhibitory effects of sodium cromoglycate and ipratropium bromide were significant whereas lignocaine failed to produce an effect. These results suggest that mediator release is an important factor in exercise-induced asthma and that in some patients the effects of the mediators may be on the postsynaptic muscarinic receptors. Local anaesthesia of sensory vagal receptors, on the other hand, does not prevent exercise asthma and these receptors do not appear to have any important role in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.     

Dose response of ipratropium bromide assessed by two methods

The dose-response relationships of ipratropium bromide were assessed by two different techniques in two groups of 10 male patients with partially reversible airways obstruction. In a randomised double-blind fashion on four days, 10 patients were given 40 μg, 80 μg, or 120 μg of ipratropium bromide or placebo from identical containers. Baseline FEV₁ and vital capacity were measured and the measurements repeated after 40 minutes, one, two, four, and six hours, and any symptoms were elicited. In the second study, each patient received cumulative doses of 40 μg, 80 μg, and 120 μg. Baseline FEV₁ was obtained and repeated 35 minutes after each dose. The peak increase of the FEV₁ was comparable in both studies. The FEV₁ was slightly greater after 120 μg than after 40 μg. Although this reached statistical significance only in the first study, it was concluded that the cumulative dose-response technique was suitable for determining the peak response. However, this technique was unsuitable for assessing duration of effect, which could be examined only in the first study. After 120 μg of ipratropium bromide, the FEV₁ was significantly greater than after 40 μg at each time interval and it was greater than 80 μg at six hours (p<0·05). No significant side effects were noted in either study. When prolonged effective bronchodilation is sought, a dose of 120 μg of ipratropium bromide may be preferable to the recommended dose of 40 μg.     

Dose response study of ipratropium bromide aerosol on maximum exercise performance in stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Although the bronchodilating effect of inhaled anticholinergics has been established in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), their effects on exercise capacity are still controversial. Previous studies have suggested that the standard dosage hardly affects exercise tolerance, whereas higher doses might elicit an improvement. The aim of the present study was to determine the dose of ipratropium bromide aerosol that improves exercise performance using progressive cycle ergometry in patients with stable COPD. METHODS: Twenty men with stable COPD of mean (SD) age 69.2 (4.6) years and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 1.00 (0.37) 1 were studied in a randomised double blind manner. Each patient received ipratropium bromide in doses of 240 micrograms, 160 micrograms, 80 micrograms, 40 micrograms, and placebo from a metered dose inhaler (MDI) with an InspirEase spacer on five separate days. Spirometric parameters were assessed before and at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after each inhalation, and pulse rate and blood pressure were also measured immediately before each spirometric measurement. Symptom limited progressive (20 watts/min) cycle ergometer exercise tests were performed 90 minutes after each inhalation. RESULTS: Ipratropium bromide in doses of 160 micrograms and 240 micrograms produced a greater increase in FEV1 than 40 micrograms or 80 micrograms ipratropium bromide at all time points. Doses of 160 micrograms and 240 micrograms ipratropium bromide also produced greater increases in maximal work load and maximal oxygen consumption than placebo, whereas 40 micrograms and 80 micrograms ipratropium bromide did not. There was a weak correlation between the change in FEV1 and the change in maximal work load (r = 0.45). No differences were found in pulse rate or blood pressure between the treatment and placebo groups, and no side effects were noted throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: A dose of at least four times the standard dose of ipratropium bromide from an MDI with a spacer device was necessary to improve maximal cycle exercise capacity in patients with stable COPD. Although the data from cycle ergometry cannot be directly applied to exercise performed during day to day activities, it is conceivable that the recommended doses of ipratropium bromide do not elicit the optimal clinical benefits.     

Effects of allergy and age on responses to salbutamol and ipratropium bromide in moderate asthma and chronic bronchitis.

The bronchodilating responses to 400 micrograms salbutamol and 80 micrograms ipratropium bromide were studied in 188 patients with chronic bronchitis (n = 113) or asthma (n = 75) and mild to moderate airflow obstruction (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) above 50% but below 2 SD of predicted value) in a crossover study on two days a week apart. Both the patients with asthma and the patients with chronic bronchitis varied considerably in their responses to the salbutamol and the ipratropium bromide. The mean increase in FEV1 in the subjects with asthma was higher after salbutamol (0.371 or 18% of the prebronchodilator value) than after ipratropium bromide (0.26 1 or 13%). In chronic bronchitis there was no difference between the increase in FEV1 after salbutamol (0.161 or 7%) and after ipratropium bromide (0.191 or 8%). When patients were categorised into those with a better response to salbutamol 400 micrograms and those with a better response to ipratropium bromide 80 micrograms, patients with chronic bronchitis responded better in general to ipratropium bromide whereas asthmatic patients responded better to salbutamol. The response pattern was also related to allergy and age, allergic patients and patients under 60 being more likely to respond better to salbutamol 400 micrograms than non-allergic patients and older patients, who benefited more from ipratropium bromide 80 micrograms. The response pattern was not related to sex, smoking habits, lung function, bronchial reactivity, respiratory symptoms, or number of exacerbations during the preceding year.     

Effects of ipratropium bromide and fenoterol aerosols in pulmonary emphysema.

In patients with radiological evidence of pulmonary emphysema the bronchodilator drugs fenoterol and ipratropium bromide produced a considerable increase in vital capacity and reduction in residual volume. The response to fenoterol was virtually complete 15 minutes after administration, but after ipratropium bromide vital capacity was still increasing at 60 minutes. The change in vital capacity was slightly greater with a combination of the two drugs than with either used alone. Changes in FEV1 and peak flow rate were small.     

异丙托溴铵对全麻病人呼吸力学的影响

目的通过麻醉前吸入异丙托溴铵,观察其对气管插管及机械通气时呼吸力学指标的影响。方法49例择期上腹部手术病人随机分为两组,雾化吸入异丙托溴铵0.5 mg的观察组(27例)和雾化吸入生理盐水的对照组(22例),分别于插管后即刻、插管后10、30及60 min监测呼吸力学指标的变化。结果观察组的气道峰压、呼吸功、吸气阻力和呼气阻力与对照组相比明显降低,而观察组肺顺应性明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。随着时间的延长,两组病人的气道峰压、呼吸功、吸气阻力和呼气阻力在不同时间点有不同程度的上升趋势;顺应性在下降到某一数值后则不再随时间而变化(P<0.05)。结论麻醉前雾化吸入异丙托溴铵,可降低机械通气早期气道峰压、呼吸机所做的呼吸功、吸气阻力及呼气阻力,同时改善肺动态顺应性。     

Direct labelling of ipratropium bromide aerosol and its deposition pattern in normal subjects and patients with chronic bronchitis.

A technique for the direct labelling of ipratropium bromide with bromine-77, with reconstitution of the drug in a metered dose inhaler so as to be identical to the commercial product, was used to study drug deposition patterns in seven normal subjects and seven patients with chronic bronchitis (mean FEV1 32% (SD 12.2%) predicted normal). The gamma camera image of the thorax was divided into a middle zone--the mediastinal zone--and the lung itself into a central zone comprising its medial third and a peripheal zone, the lateral two thirds. Measurements after 10 inhalations of labelled ipratropium bromide showed similar results for the two groups of subjects. The total lung dose inhaled was 11.2% of 203 micrograms and 11.7% of 186 micrograms in the normal subjects and the patients respectively. In contrast to the deposition patterns seen in aerosol studies using steady state inhalation methods, there was no difference in deposition pattern--that is, the distribution between the central and the peripheral lung zones--between the normal subjects and the patients with airways obstruction.     

Lack of association between ipratropium bromide and mortality in elderly patients with chronic obstructive airway disease

BACKGROUND: Ipratropium is commonly used for the management of elderly patients with obstructive airway disease. However, a recent report suggested that its use might be associated with a significant increase in mortality. A study was therefore conducted to compare all-cause mortality rates between users and non-users of ipratropium in elderly patients with either asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using linked data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information, the Ontario Drug Benefit Program, the Ontario Health Insurance Plan, and the Ontario Registered Persons database. A total of 32 393 patients were identified who were aged 65 years or older and who had been discharged from hospital with asthma or COPD between 1 April 1992 and 31 March 1997. All-cause mortality rates were compared between those treated and those not treated with ipratropium following discharge from hospital. RESULTS: In total, 49% of patients received ipratropium within 90 days of discharge. After adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity, use of health services, and other airway medications there was no significant association in patients with COPD between the use of ipratropium and mortality (relative risk (RR) 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98 to 1.08). In patients with asthma, however, there was a slight increase in the relative risk of mortality associated with the use of ipratropium (RR 1.24; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.39). A dose-response increase in the mortality rate was not observed with increasing use of ipratropium in either COPD or asthma. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ipratropium in patients with COPD was not associated with an increase in mortality. However, in asthma there was a small increase in the mortality rate. Since asthmatic patients who received ipratropium had greater use of other airway medications and health services, the difference in mortality rate between users and non-users may be a reflection of unmeasured differences in asthma severity.     

Bronchodilator reversibility to low and high doses of terbutaline and ipratropium bromide in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND--There is uncertainty regarding the use of monotherapy or combination therapy with beta 2 agonists and anticholinergic drugs in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The measurement of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) or relaxed vital capacity (RVC) in the assessment of reversibility in these patients has also caused considerable debate. METHODS--Twenty seven patients with COPD were evaluated on two occasions. Patients received the following treatments in sequence: (sequence 1) low dose terbutaline 500 micrograms, high dose terbutaline 5000 micrograms, low dose ipratropium 40 micrograms, high dose ipratropium 200 micrograms; (sequence 2) low dose ipratropium 40 micrograms, high dose ipratropium 200 micrograms, low dose terbutaline 500 micrograms, high dose terbutaline 5000 micrograms. RVC, FEV1 and FVC were measured at baseline and 30 minutes after successive treatments. RESULTS--Values for FEV1 at baseline on the first and second study days were not significantly different: 0.90 (0.87-0.93) 1 v 0.90 (0.87-0.93) 1. Likewise, baseline values for RVC and FVC were not different. The number of patients showing a greater than 330 ml overall improvement in RVC was 20 of 27 for sequence 1 and 22 of 27 for sequence 2; similar trends were observed for FEV1 and FVC. For all three parameters there was a significant difference between mean responses to low and high doses of terbutaline when the latter was given as the first drug in sequence 1. When ipratropium was given first in sequence 2 there was, however, no significant improvement with high dose terbutaline over and above the response to low dose terbutaline. The latter effect was more noticeable with RVC than with either FEV1 or FVC. The total bronchodilator response at the end of each sequence was similar whether ipratropium was given first or second. CONCLUSIONS--The measurement of RVC, FEV1, and FVC were equally effective at picking up those patients who had a significant overall bronchodilator response to combined therapy with inhaled beta 2 agonist and anticholinergic medication. There was no significant benefit of adding a higher dose of terbutaline when ipratropium bromide had been given previously, particularly when using RVC as the parameter of response.     

Effects of theophylline and ipratropium bromide on exercise performance in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND—The effects of theophylline oranticholinergic agents on exercise capacity in patients with chronicobstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remain controversial. The aim ofthe present study was to compare the effect of an oral theophyllinewith an inhaled anticholinergic agent and to examine the effects ofcombined therapy on exercise performance using progressive cycle ergometry.
METHODS—Twenty one men with stable COPD anda mean (SD) forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁)of 1.00 (0.40) l were studied. Theophylline (600 or 800 mg daily),ipratropium bromide (160 µg), a combination of both drugs, andplacebo were given in a randomised, double blind, four period crossoverdesign study. Spirometric data, pulse rate, and blood pressure wereassessed before and at 90 and 120 minutes after inhalation. Symptomlimited progressive cycle ergometer exercise tests (20 watts/min) wereperformed 90minutes after each inhalation, and dyspnoea was measuredduring exercise using the Borg scale.
RESULTS—The mean (SD) serum theophyllineconcentration was 18.3 (6.3) µg/ml, and seven patients had sideeffects during treatment with theophylline. Theophylline andipratropium bromide produced greater increases in FEV₁,maximal oxygen consumption, maximal minute ventilation, and severaldyspnoea ratios than placebo. There were no differences betweentheophylline and ipratropium bromide except in maximal heart rate. Acombination of both drugs produced greater improvements in pulmonaryfunction and exercise capacity than either drug alone.
CONCLUSIONS—Both high dose theophylline and highdose ipratropium bromide improved exercise capacity in patients withstable COPD. Although data based on short term effects cannot bedirectly applied to long term therapy, theophylline added to an inhaledanticholinergic agent may have beneficial effects on exercise capacityin patients with COPD.

     

Effect of ipratropium bromide aerosol on respiratory function in patients under ventilator treatment

Twenty patients, 36-78 years old, with a history of chronic obstructive lung disease, and immediately after operation mostly for cardiac disease, were treated with ipratropium bromide (IB, 15 cases) or placebo (5 cases). A metered dose inhaler with a new adapter was used during postoperative ventilator treatment. In the IB group the heart rate did not change, but the inspiratory resistance decreased and the arterial oxygen tension increased. This is considered to indicate an effect not only on large but also on small airways, or an improvement of the ventilation/perfusion relationship. The investigation also demonstrated the practical usefulness of the new adapter.     

Synergism between ipratropium and theophylline in asthma

Ipratropium bromide is a bronchodilator whose effect has been compared with beta agonists but not with theophylline. Twelve asthmatics were given four two-week courses of the different combinations of ipratropium (40 micrograms in two puffs), theophylline capsules, and their corresponding placebos in a random, double-blind fashion. There was a significant increase in FEV1 and MMFR 60 minutes after theophylline was administered (p less than 0.05) when measured after one and two weeks of therapy. FEV1 and MMFR were significantly increased (p less than 0.05) 30 and 60 minutes after ipratropium inhalation and this increase was significantly greater when the patient had also been taking theophylline compared with placebo capsules (p less than 0.05). There was no toxicity associated with this combination. The synergism demonstrated may be related to the time sequence of drug administration, mechanical or cellular factors.