The Surface Electrocardiogram Predicts Risk of Heart Block During Right Heart Catheterization in Patients With Preexisting Left Bundle Branch Block: Implications for the Definition of Complete Left Bundle Branch Block

LBBB and Heart Block . Background: Patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) undergoing right heart catheterization can develop complete heart block (CHB) or right bundle branch block (RBBB) in response to right bundle branch (RBB) trauma. We hypothesized that LBBB patients with an initial r wave (≥1 mm) in lead V1 have intact left to right ventricular septal (VS) activation suggesting persistent conduction over the left bundle branch. Trauma to the RBB should result in RBBB pattern rather than CHB in such patients. Methods: Between January 2002 and February 2007, we prospectively evaluated 27 consecutive patients with LBBB developing either CHB or RBBB during right heart catheterization. The prevalence of an r wave ≥1 mm in lead V1 was determined using 118 serial LBBB electrocardiographs (ECGs) from our hospital database. Results: Catheter trauma to the RBB resulted in CHB in 18 patients and RBBB in 9 patients. All 6 patients with ≥1 mm r wave in V1 developed RBBB. Among these 6 patients q wave in lead I, V5, or V6 were present in 3. Four patients (3 in CHB group and 1 in RBBB group) developed spontaneous CHB during a median follow‐up of 61 months. V1 q wave ≥1 mm was present in 28% of hospitalized complete LBBB patients. Conclusions: An initial r wave of ≥1 mm in lead V1 suggests intact left to right VS activation and identifies LBBB patients at low risk of CHB during right heart catheterization. These preliminary findings indicate that an initial r wave of ≥1 mm in lead V1, present in approximately 28% of ECGs with classically defined LBBB, may constitute a new exclusion criterion when defining complete LBBB. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. pp. 781‐785, July 2010)     

Correlation between Electrocardiographic Features and Mechanical Dyssynchrony in Heart Failure Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block

Background: Few electrocardiographic parameters beyond the QRS duration were studied with regard to the correlation with mechanical dyssynchrony. This study aims to analyze the correlation between electrocardiographic parameters and mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB). Methods: Patients with HF, ejection fraction ≤ 35%, and QRS interval ≥ 120 ms with a LBBB were prospectively studied. We analyzed the correlation between electrocardiographic parameters (QRS duration, R voltage in limb leads, S voltage in precordial leads, Sokolow and Cornell indexes, QRS axis deviation, and QRS notches in lateral and inferior leads) and mechanical dyssynchrony measured by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI). Results: A group of 50 patients were studied, 60% male, 78% with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, NYHA Class III–IV (86%), and ejection fraction of 0.22 ± 0.6. Intra‐ and interventricular dyssynchrony occurred in 68% and 74% of patients, respectively. The S amplitude in precordial leads and the Sokolow and Cornel indexes show a weak correlation with the degree of dyssynchrony. In the patients with QRS notching in the lateral and inferior leads, we observed significantly greater prevalence of intraventricular dyssynchrony, with sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 56%, respectively, for notches in lateral leads. The QRS duration presents moderate correlation with the degree of both intraventricular (r = 0.48) and interventricular dyssynchrony (r = 0.46). Conclusion: The following electrocardiographic parameters were related to the degree of mechanical dyssynchrony: QRS duration and notches in QRS. In addition, the patients tend to have highest S amplitude in precordial leads. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2011;16(1):41–48     

Profound Independent Effects of Left Bundle Branch Block and Heart Rate During Supraventricular Tachycardia

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) has negative hemodynamic effects. In the same patient, profound hypotension occurs during supraventricular tachycardia with LBBB but not at the same rate in the absence of LBBB. At slower rates, blood pressure is similar with and without LBBB.     

左束支起搏治疗心力衰竭的研究进展

左束支起搏可维持左心室电与机械同步性,对起搏诱导性心肌病、心房颤动快心室率合并心力衰竭和需要再同步化治疗及常规双心室起搏失败后的心力衰竭患者有显著疗效,现综述该领域的研究进展.     

Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With New-Onset Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block Following TAVR

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine the impact of new-onset persistent (NOP) left bundle branch block (LBBB) on long-term (>2 year) outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).BackgroundThe impact of NOP-LBBB after TAVR remains controversial and no data exist regarding long-term outcomes.MethodsA total of 1,020 consecutive patients without pre-existing LBBB or permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) undergoing TAVR were included. NOP-LBBB was defined as any new LBBB post-TAVR that persisted at hospital discharge. Follow-up clinical and echocardiographic data were obtained at a median of 3 years (interquartile range: 2 to 5 years) post-TAVR.ResultsNOP-LBBB occurred in 212 patients (20.1%) following TAVR. There were no differences between NOP-LBBB and no NOP-LBBB groups, except for a higher use of the self-expandable CoreValve system in the NOP-LBBB group (p < 0.001). At follow-up, there were no differences between NOP-LBBB and no NOP-LBBB groups in all-cause mortality (45.3% vs. 42.5%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR]:1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82 to 1.47; p = 0.54), cardiovascular mortality (14.2% vs. 14.4%; adjusted HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.87; p = 0.95), or heart failure rehospitalization (19.8% vs. 15.6%; adjusted HR: 1.44; 95% CI: 0.85 to 2.46; p = 0.18). NOP-LBBB was associated with an increased risk of permanent pacemaker implantation at follow-up (15.5% vs. 5.4%; adjusted HR: 2.45; 95% CI: 1.37 to 4.38; p = 0.002), with the highest risk within the first 12 months. Left ventricular ejection fraction increased over time in patients with no NOP-LBBB but slightly decreased in those with NOP-BBB (p < 0.001 for changes in left ventricular ejection fraction between groups).ConclusionsAfter a median follow-up of 3 years post-TAVR, NOP-LBBB was not associated with a higher mortality or heart failure rehospitalization. However, NOP-LBBB increased the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation and negatively impacted left ventricular function over time. These results should inform future efforts for improving the management of patients with NOP-LBBB post-TAVR.     

Concordant Versus Discordant Left Bundle Branch Block in Heart Failure Patients: Novel Clinical Value of an Old Electrocardiographic Diagnosis

BackgroundOver the last 50 years left bundle branch block (LBBB) has been defined as homophasic (concordant: cLBBB) or heterophasic (discordant: dLBBB) when associated with a positive or negative T wave in leads I and V5-V6, respectively. LBBB is recognized as an adverse prognostic factor in heart failure (HF). The prevalence and clinical significance of cLBBB and dLBBB in HF patients are unknown.Methods and ResultsA total of 897 consecutive systolic HF patients (age 65 ± 13 years, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], 34 ± 10%) underwent clinical characterization, electrocardiographic evaluation for LBBB diagnosis and classification, and follow-up for cardiac events (median 37 months, range 1-84). LBBB was diagnosed in 232 patients (26%), cLBBB in 71 (31%), and dLBBB in 161 (69%). The dLBBB patients were older than those with cLBBB, and presented with lower LVEF, greater left ventricular telediastolic diameter and left ventricular mass index, higher level of brain natriuretic peptide, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, renin activity, and norepinephrine (all P < .05). At Kaplan-Meier analysis, LBBB (P = .003) and dLBBB (P = .036) were associated with a worse prognosis when the composite end point of sudden death and implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock was considered.ConclusionsIn systolic HF, dLBBB is associated with a worse clinical, neurohormonal, and prognostic profile. LBBB classification could represent a useful tool in routine clinical evaluation.     

左束支区域起搏可改善右束支阻滞的心电图表现

目的:旨在观察左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)纠正右束支阻滞(RBBB)的临床效果及心电图特点.方法:本研究为单中心、前瞻性观察性研究,纳入2018年4月至2019年12月间入院有心室起搏指征,存在基线RBBB图形且QRS波群时限≥120 ms、左心室射血分数>50％并接受LBBAP的患者,分析LBBAP纠正RBBB的临床...     

Association of Serum Zinc Level With Prognosis in Patients With Heart Failure

Background

Zinc is an essential cofactor for energy transfer and physiological heart function, has antioxidant properties, and is involved in multiple signaling pathways. We aimed to investigate the associations between serum zinc levels with prognosis, as well as underlying cardiac function and exercise capacity, in patients with heart failure (HF).

心力衰竭患者焦虑抑郁症状及其相关因素

目的:观察心力衰竭患者焦虑症状(焦虑)和抑郁症状(抑郁)的发生情况及其相关因素. 方法:横断面研究.顺序入选心力衰竭住院患者684例,收集患者的一般资料和住院期间情况,填写Zung氏焦虑自评量表(Self-Rating Anxiety Scale,SAS)和抑郁自评量表(Self-Rating Depression Scale,SDS),进行统计学分析,评价心力衰竭患者焦虑、抑郁的评分情况及其相关因素. 结果:684例心力衰竭患者中有20.03%的患者存在焦虑,有23.39%的患者存在抑郁.性别和文化程度与心力衰竭患者合并焦虑相关(P均<0.05),性别和纽约心功能分级与心力衰竭患者合并抑郁相关(P均<0.05). 结论:心力衰竭患者中存在较高的焦虑和抑郁的发生率;女性、文化程度低的患者更易发生焦虑,女性、心功能分级高的患者更易发生抑郁.     

Underuse of Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Left Bundle Branch Block

Thrombolytic therapy reduces mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and left bundle branch block (LBBB). The difficulty in accurately diagnosing AMI in patients with LBBB, however, might result in their undertreatment. Among 3,890 patients hospitalized with chest pain, 241 (6.2%) had LBBB at presentation. The only variable independently associated with AMI among patients with LBBB was in‐hospital left ventricular failure (odds ratio [OR]: 4.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.95–9.57, p < 0.0005). Only 16 (29%) of the LBBB patients with AMI received thrombolytic therapy compared with 583 (78%) of the 747 patients with ST‐elevation AMI (p < 0.0005). A further 19 (10%) LBBB patients without AMI also received thrombolysis. Difficulty in making an accurate early diagnosis in patients with LBBB ensures that the majority of those with AMI fail to receive thrombolytic therapy while others without AMI are treated inappropriately. Improved diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are needed for patients with acute coronary syndromes and LBBB. Copyright © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Loss of Left Bundle Branch Block following Biventricular Pacing Therapy for Heart Failure: Evidence for Electrical Remodeling?

Cardiac resynchronization therapy has been proven to improve symptoms and indices of left ventricular function in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delays. We present a case of a patient with New York Association Class III heart failure and left bundle branch block, who received a biventricular pacemaker in order to achieve cardiac resynchronization. Her symptoms improved markedly, as did left ventricular ejection fraction and dimensions. In addition, her intrinsic QRS duration normalized. This may represent a salutory effect of biventricular pacing on electrical remodeling.