A real-world retrospective analysis of the management of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer in Ontario,Canada from 2010 – 2018

PurposeWe sought to quantify mCRPC patient treatment patterns and survival across multiple lines of therapy after prior androgen-receptor-axis-targeted therapy (ARAT) failure.MethodsIndividuals diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2010 and 2018 were identified in the Ontario Cancer Registry (OCR). An algorithm was created to identify patients with mCRPC that was aligned to Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 criteria (PCWG3) and validated with Canadian clinical experts. In the mCRPC setting, treatment patterns were assessed by line of therapy, and survival was calculated from treatment initiation until death or lost to follow-up.Results64,484 men were diagnosed withprostate cancer in Ontario between 2010 and 2018with 5,588 men assessed to have mCRPC and 2,970 (53%) of those received first-line systemic treatment. Across the first-, second- and third-line of therapy, ARATs (abiraterone and enzalutamide) were the most used therapies. Survival for mCRPC patients treated with ARATs in first-, second- and third-line were 13.0 (95% CI, 11.6 – 14.5), 11.5 (95% CI, 10.1 – 13.4) and 8.9 (95% CI, 7.4 – 10.2) months, respectively. Survival for mCRPC patients treated with taxanes in first, second- and third-line were 16.7 (95% CI, 14.8 – 18.0), 11.3 (95% CI, 10.1 – 12.5) and 7.8 (95% CI, 6.5 – 10.6) months, respectively. No statistical difference in overall survival was found between taxanes and ARATs.ConclusionIn this analysis of a large retrospective cohort of Canadian men with mCRPC, we found that survival in patients treated with ARATs and taxanes was fairly similar across all lines of therapy. Importantly, this trend was maintained in ARAT-exposed patients, where sequential ARAT and taxanes offered similar survival. These data may help inform optimal sequencing of therapies in mCRPC.     

Clinical outcomes in a contemporary series of “young” patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who were 60 years and younger

BackgroundThe prognosis of younger patients with prostate cancer is unclear, and the very few studies assessing those with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have mainly involved patients treated with older therapies. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of a contemporary series of docetaxel-treated patients with mCRPC who were 60 years and younger.Patients and methodsWe retrospectively identified 134 patients who were 60 years and younger who were treated with docetaxel in 25 Italian hospitals and recorded their predocetaxel history of prostate cancer, their characteristics at the start of chemotherapy, and their postdocetaxel treatment history and outcomes.ResultsMost of the 134 consecutive patients with mCRPC received the standard 3-week docetaxel schedule; median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 months, and 90 patients underwent further therapies after progression. The median overall survival (OS) from the start of docetaxel treatment was 21 months, but OS was significantly prolonged by the postprogression treatments, particularly those based on the new agents such as cabazitaxel, abiraterone acetate, or enzalutamide. OS was significantly shorter in the patients with a shorter interval between the diagnosis of prostate cancer and the start of docetaxel treatment; those who received hormonal treatment for a shorter period; those with shorter prostate-specific antigen doubling times; and those with lower hemoglobin levels, a worse performance status, and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels before starting treatment with docetaxel.ConclusionsThe findings of this first study of clinical outcomes in a contemporary series of younger patients with mCRPC showed that their survival is similar to that expected in unselected patients with mCRPC who were of any age.     

Treatment options in castration-resistant prostate cancer: Current therapies and emerging docetaxel-based regimens

BackgroundDocetaxel-based chemotherapy remains the standard of care for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and it is the only globally approved first-line therapy. Although docetaxel offers improved survival for this patient population, it is also associated with toxicity and resistance in many patients, representing a need for more efficacious therapies. Preclinical advances have led to improved understanding of the molecular biology of prostate cancer, and targeted therapies that exploit the signaling pathways and molecular targets that underscore the disease are being clinically investigated in combination with docetaxel.DesignThis article briefly highlights recent data from phase III trials in mCRPC that have led to agent approval. This article also reviews phase II and III trials in which docetaxel-based regimens have been investigated in mCRPC.ResultsRecently approved agents, including sipuleucel-T, cabazitaxel, abiraterone acetate, and enzalutamide, have diversified the mCRPC treatment landscape. Phase III trials evaluating docetaxel in combination with targeted therapies, including potent oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, dasatinib, in the READY trial and clusterin inhibitor, custirsen, in the SYNERGY trial, are currently ongoing.ConclusionsIn combination with docetaxel, targeted agents dasatinib and custirsen will likely expand the existing treatment paradigm for mCRPC if results from phase III trials are positive.     

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma in the United States

IntroductionThis large-scale, US-based study characterized real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (aUC).MethodsThis retrospective cohort analysis included patients with stage IV or node-positive aUC between January 1, 2011, and August 31, 2020, from an electronic health record-derived, de-identified database (Flatiron Health). Baseline characteristics and treatment patterns were assessed by first-line (1L) systemic treatment received and cisplatin eligibility status. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated.ResultsOf 8,183 patients included, 5,855 (71.6%) received systemic 1L therapy and 2,328 (28.4%) did not. Median (range) follow-up from aUC diagnosis was 9.7 (0.2-116.6) months. Of patients who received 1L systemic therapy, 30.1% were cisplatin-eligible, 39.2% were cisplatin-ineligible, 10.5% did not receive cisplatin despite qualifying ECOG PS and renal function, and cisplatin eligibility was unknown in 20.2%. Of those treated, 74.8% received 1L chemotherapy and 23.0% received 1L immuno-oncology–based monotherapy. Median OS (95% CI) was 14.5 (14.0-15.2) months in patients who received 1L systemic therapy and 6.8 (6.2-7.3) months in those who did not. Of those treated, cisplatin-ineligible patients had worse OS and PFS outcomes vs. other subgroups. Among cisplatin-ineligible patients, 1L immuno-oncology monotherapy (n = 865) was associated with worse OS and PFS outcomes than 1L chemotherapy (n = 1,369).ConclusionsMore than 25% of aUC patients did not receive 1L systemic therapy; of patients who were treated, most received chemotherapy, with less than 25% receiving immuno-oncology–based monotherapy. Overall, these results highlight the substantial unmet need in this population, specifically among cisplatin-ineligible patients.     

Efficacy of cabazitaxel in fourth or later line of therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Multi-institutional real-world experience in Germany

ObjectiveSince multiple oncological treatment options in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are available, optimal sequencing of therapies are under investigation. However, the efficacy of Cabazitaxel (CAB) in fourth and later lines of therapy is rarely investigated.Material and MethodsFifty three patients with mCRPC treated with CAB in fourth line or later were included in our retrospective study, which involved eight uro-oncology centers in Germany. Clinical and tumor characteristics, as well as PSA-response rates were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier plots addressed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Logistic regression models predicted risk factors of overall mortality (OM).ResultsOf 53 patients, 79% (n=42), 19% (n=10) and 2% (n=1) received CAB in fourth, fifth and sixth line. A median of 4 cycles of CAB were administered. Median PSA at start of CAB was 199ng/ml (interquartile range (IQR) 70-869). In total, 89% had bone and 40% visceral metastases prior to the start of CAB. Moreover, 30% of patients received Docetaxel in first line therapy for mCRPC. Most frequent sequence of therapy was abiraterone followed by docetaxel and followed by enzalutamide. Overall, median PSA-response rate was -20% (IQR -80 to +10%). Patients with docetaxel in first line had a significantly better median PSA-response on CAB (-80 vs. 20%, P=0.03). Median OS, radiographic PFS and overall PFS were 14.8 (Confidence interval (CI): 11.0–20.8), 3.0 (CI: 2.9–4.0) and 2.9 (CI: 2.0–3.3) months, respectively. In multivariable analyses, visceral metastases, PSA >100ng/ml, ISUP4+5 and later administration of Docetaxel were predictors of OM.ConclusionReal-world experiences indicate that favorable oncologic outcomes can be achieved with CAB especially regarding PSA-response and OS even in the fourth line or later in patients with mCRPC.     

UnCHAARTED territory: The role of docetaxel rechallenge following chemohormonal therapy for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer

ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of docetaxel rechallenge (DR) for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) following chemohormonal therapy for metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Additionally, we sought to define clinical factors predicting treatment response.Patients and MethodsRetrospective analysis of men treated with docetaxel for mCSPC and then rechallenged in the mCRPC setting from four cancer centers in Ontario, Canada. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) following DR were evaluated.ResultsFifty five patients were identified between 2015 and 2020. Prior to DR, 94.5% of patients received androgen-receptor axis targeted therapy, 20% received radium-223, and 1.8% received cabazitaxel. Among 54 evaluable patients, 27.8% had a PSA decline ≥50%. Median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.1?4.8) and median OS from androgen deprivation therapy initiation was 38.3 months (95% CI, 32.9?41.0). A Gleason Score of ≥8 was an independent predictor of prolonged PFS (HR 0.32, 95% CI, 0.12?0.81; P=0.02).ConclusionsDR following chemohormonal therapy for mCSPC produced a meaningful PSA response in approximately one-quarter of patients, with relatively short PFS. The impact of Gleason Score on docetaxel response warrants further investigation.     

Weekly low-dose docetaxel is an effective treatment with fewer adverse events for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in Taiwanese patients

ObjectiveBased on the TAX 327 Phase III trial, docetaxel (DTX)-based chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, some heterogeneity is observed in clinical practice. The present study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of a weekly low-dose DTX regimen, which is clinical practice at our institution, and to compare it with the standard triweekly DTX use in the TAX 327 trial.Materials and methodsWe reviewed the charts of all mCRPC patients treated with DTX 30 mg/m² weekly on Days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle and prednisolone 5 mg twice daily between January 2006 and February 2014 in our hospital.ResultsIn the first-line setting, 19 patients with mCRPC received weekly DTX chemotherapy. The median four cycles of treatment were given in our cohort. The median follow-up period from the start of chemotherapy was 27.9 months (range 5.4–67.2months). The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate was 47.3%, and the median overall survival was 15.8 months (range 1.2–34.5 months). The main toxicities were anemia (57%), fatigue (26%), and neuropathy (10%). Two patients had different Grade 3 to 4 adverse events (neutropenia and anemia). Our results revealed initial PSA <100 ng/mL, long duration (>12 months) of response to primary hormone therapy, rechallenge, and a higher accumulation dose of DTX were associated with good prognosis.ConclusionFor Taiwanese mCRPC patients, weekly DTX 30 mg/m² is an efficient regimen for disease control with relatively low Grade 3 or 4 hematological adverse effects. The proper treatment duration of DTX therapy for mCRPC in Taiwanese patients is still uncertain, so further research is needed.     

Current and emerging treatment modalities for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Docetaxel-based therapy is established as the standard first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), based on results from two landmark Phase III studies. However, prognosis remains poor, with a median survival of less than 2 years. There is no standard of care for patients who progress during or after docetaxel treatment, which represents a real unmet medical need. Several small retrospective studies suggest that patients with mCRPC who responded to first-line docetaxel-based therapy are sensitive to re-treatment, but a survival benefit in prospective randomized trials has not been demonstrated. Epithelial-stromal interactions in the tumour microenvironment appear to play a central role in prostate cancer progression and response to therapy. Recent insights into the molecular mechanisms that underpin prostate cancer progression have allowed the identification of potential therapeutic targets. New agents, including angiogenesis inhibitors, hormone therapies, chemotherapies, bone targeting agents, vaccines and immunotherapies are currently undergoing clinical development in advanced prostate cancer using docetaxel as a backbone. Several Phase III studies have now been completed. Sipuleucel-T prolonged survival compared with placebo in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with mCRPC. Cabazitaxel plus prednisone prolonged survival in patients with mCRPC who progressed during or after docetaxel-based therapy compared with the active agent mitoxantrone, plus prednisone. Multidisciplinary management and optimization of the role and timing of new agents in this evolving treatment continuum will be critical to maximizing patient outcomes. Identification of predictive markers and better gene expression profiling will be critical to tailoring therapies to individual patients and disease states, whereas validated surrogate markers of overall survival will help accelerate drug approval.     

Wnt-pathway Activating Mutations Are Associated with Resistance to First-line Abiraterone and Enzalutamide in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

BackgroundWnt signaling is a cellular pathway involved in embryogenesis, development, and neoplasia. Wnt-pathway activation may accelerate prostate cancer androgen-independent growth and mediate antiandrogen resistance. Since 10–20% of advanced prostate cancers harbor Wnt-activating mutations, we aimed to characterize the clinical features and response to novel antiandrogens in such patients.ObjectiveTo determine whether men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who harbor Wnt-pathway mutations have poorer responses to first-line novel hormonal therapies: abiraterone/enzalutamide.Design, setting, and participantsPatients with mCRPC who received first-line abiraterone or enzalutamide were retrospectively evaluated. Using tumor DNA analyses, we queried for activating mutations in CTNNB1 or inactivating mutations in APC or RNF43, all of which are predicted to stimulate Wnt signaling. Presence or absence of at least one Wnt-activating alteration was correlated with clinical-pathologic characteristics and treatment outcomes.Outcome measurements and statistical analysisTime to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, overall survival (OS), and PSA response were measured. Cox regression models were used to test associations between Wnt status and clinical-pathologic outcomes; Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses were used to compare time-to-event endpoints.Results and limitationsOf 137 patients evaluated, 11% (n = 15) had tumor DNA analysis showing at least one Wnt-stimulating alteration. Patients with Wnt-activating mutations had numerically fewer T3/T4 tumors than Wnt wild-type patients (31% vs 51%), but were otherwise generally balanced. Median time to PSA progression on first-line abiraterone/enzalutamide was shorter in Wnt-activated patients (6.5 vs 9.6 mo, hazard ratio [HR] 2.34, p = 0.003), as was OS (23.6 vs 27.7 mo, HR 2.28, p = 0.01). PSA responses were numerically worse in Wnt-activated patients (53% vs 75%, p = 0.12). Presence of Wnt-activating alterations (adjusted HR [aHR] 2.33, p = 0.007) and use of previous chemotherapy (aHR 1.83, p = 0.004) were both independently associated with increased hazard of progression.ConclusionsPatients with somatic Wnt-pathway activating mutations have worse outcomes to first-line abiraterone/enzalutamide than Wnt wild-type patients. Our data suggest that additional genomically informed therapies are needed for this relevant subset of mCRPC patients.Patient summaryIn this report, we retrospectively examined outcomes of metastatic prostate cancer patients with or without Wnt-pathway mutations who received abiraterone or enzalutamide for the first time, in order to examine whether these mutations affect the prognosis. Our study suggested that patients who have Wnt-pathway activating mutations derived less benefit from abiraterone and enzalutamide when compared to patients without these mutations. We conclude that Wnt-pathway mutations might decrease the effectiveness of abiraterone and enzalutamide, and we propose that the Wnt pathway might be a good therapeutic target for these patients, in order to potentially reverse or prolong resistance to abiraterone and enzalutamide in men with Wnt mutations.     

Predictive value of low testosterone concentrations during and prior to enzalutamide treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

BackgroundEnzalutamide is an effective treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. However, variances in responses are observed and there is a need for biomarkers predicting treatment outcome and selection. In this study, we aimed to explore the predictive value of testosterone for first-line enzalutamide treatment of mCRPC.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 72 mCRPC patients with no prior abiraterone or docetaxel treatment was performed. Serum testosterone was measured using a liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry method. Association of pre- and during-enzalutimide treatment testosterone levels with progression-free survival (PFS) and failure-free survival (FFS) was investigated using univariate and multivariate Cox models. Testosterone levels were dichotomized into a low (Q1) and high (interquartile range-Q4) group.ResultsMedian PFS (7.4 v. 20.8 months, P<0.0001) and FFS (6.6 v. 17.7 months, P<0.0001) were shorter for patients with low testosterone levels (<0.217 nmol/L) during enzalutamide treatment. Furthermore, univariate Cox proportional hazards models revealed that low testosterone levels were associated with shorter PFS (HR 3.5, 95%CI 1.9-6.3; P<0.001) and FFS (HR 3.1, 95%CI 1.7–5.5; P<0.001). Pre-treatment testosterone levels were lower than during-treatment levels (P<0.0001) and low pre-treatment testosterone levels (<0.143 nmol/L) were associated with shorter median PFS (12.6 v. 20.5 months, P<0.01) and FFS (12.6 v. 22.5 months, P<0.01).ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that low serum testosterone levels during and prior to enzalutamide treatment can predict progression in mCRPC patients and identifies tumors resistant to next-in-line enzalutamide treatment. Validation in a prospective cohort is warranted.     

Clinical outcomes and molecular profiling of advanced metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with 225Ac-PSMA-617 targeted alpha-radiation therapy

IntroductionTargeted alpha-radiation therapy (TAT) with ²²⁵Ac-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands is a promising novel treatment option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. However, limited data are available on efficacy, quality of life (QoL), and pretherapeutic biomarkers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ²²⁵Ac-PSMA TAT and impact on QoL in advanced mCRPC, and to explore predictive biomarkers on pretherapeutic metastatic tissue biopsies.MethodsObservational cohort study including consecutive patients treated with ²²⁵Ac-PSMA TAT between February 2016 and July 2018. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Furthermore, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) changes, radiological response, safety, QoL, and xerostomia were evaluated. Biopsies were analyzed with immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing.ResultsThirteen patients were included. Median OS was 8.5 months for the total cohort and 12.6 months for PSMA radioligand therapy-naïve patients. PSA declines of ≥90% and ≥50% were observed in 46% and 69% of patients, respectively. Six patients were radiologically evaluable; 50% showed partial response. All patients showed >90% total tumor volume reduction on PET imaging. Patients experienced clinically relevant decrease of pain and QoL improvement in physical and role functioning domains. Xerostomia persisted during follow-up. Patients with high baseline immunohistochemical PSMA expression or DNA damage repair alterations tended to have longer OS.ConclusionsTAT with ²²⁵Ac-PSMA resulted in remarkable survival and biochemical responses in advanced mCRPC patients. Patients experienced clinically relevant QoL improvement, although xerostomia was found to be nontransient. Baseline immunohistochemical PSMA expression and DNA damage repair status are potential predictive biomarkers of response to ²²⁵Ac-PSMA TAT.     

Clinical phenotypes associated with circulating tumor cell enumeration in metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer

BackgroundThe presence of ≥5 circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is prognostic for shorter survival in men with metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, some men have low CTCs despite widespread disease, suggesting heterogeneity in CTC phenotype or detection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of CTC enumeration with clinical disease characteristics and overall survival in men with mCRPC at our institution.DesignCTCs were enumerated using the CellSearch method in a prospective correlative study in men with mCRPC starting a new systemic therapy. The primary objective was to determine the clinical phenotype of the subset of men with mCRPC who have a poor prognosis and low CTCs. Secondary end points included associations of CTCs with survival and known prognostic biomarkers, before therapy and at progression.ResultsAt baseline, median CTC count was 16 cells and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 178 ng/ml. At progression, median CTC count was 42, PSA level was 245 ng/ml, levels of lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase rose, and level of hemoglobin dropped. The median overall survival for this heavily pretreated population was 11.2 months, and the multivariable hazard ratio for death of men with CTCs<5 vs.≥5 was 0.43 (95% CI: 0.24–0.77). Median progression-free survival was 4.4 months. CTC enumeration modestly correlated with lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase levels but only weakly correlated with PSA and hemoglobin levels. We were unable to identify a consistent subgroup of poor prognosis men with a low number of CTCs.ConclusionCTC enumeration appears to be prognostic in men with mCRPC and describes a phenotype of hematogenous dissemination that cannot be predicted based on standard clinical and laboratory assessments.     

KDM5D predicts response to docetaxel chemotherapy in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients

BackgroundThe administration of docetaxel chemotherapy is one therapeutic option to delay disease progression and increase overall survival in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, about 15% of patients are primary resistant to chemotherapy and hence would benefit from an alternative mCRPC treatment. Despite intensive research, there are no robust clinical validated biomarkers to predict mCRPC therapy response. Thus, the aim of the study was to determine KDM5D expression in archival radical prostatectomy specimens of patients medicated with docetaxel at time of mCRPC development in order to correlate KMD5D expression with treatment response.MethodsWe used in situ hybridization (ISH) (RNA scope 2.5 HD) to determine KDM5D expression in tissue samples of 28 prostate cancer patients. KDM5D status was correlated to chemotherapy response (PSA and radiographic response).ResultsData revealed that KDM5D is significantly overexpressed in tumor cells (P<0.0001) but also in benign cells (P<0.02) of those patients who responded to chemotherapy compared to non-responders.ConclusionsTo summarize, KDM5D is a promising novel biomarker predicting response to docetaxel chemotherapy already at the time of localized disease and thus potentially avoiding metastatic biopsies in the mCRPC stage of disease.     

Androgen receptor inhibitor treatments: Cardiovascular adverse events and comorbidity considerations in patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer

ObjectivesProstate cancer and cardiovascular (CV) disease share several risk factors, with the incidence of both rising with increasing age. Systemic prostate cancer therapies may increase CV risk. For example, gonadotropic releasing hormone agonists have been associated with increased development of CV risk factors, and potentially with CV disease. For men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), the opportunity to mitigate CV risk by appropriate selection of therapy (i.e., use of newer agents such as androgen receptor inhibitors) may be possible. The phase 3 PROSPER, SPARTAN, and ARAMIS trials for enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide, the 3 approved androgen receptor inhibitors for men with nmCRPC, were all associated with increased metastasis-free survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Our objective in writing this review is to improve awareness of the relationship between long-term androgen deprivation and increased risk for CV disease and inform treatment decision making for patients with mCRPC who also have CV comorbidities.MethodsThe PubMed database was searched from 2010 to November 5, 2019 for articles pertaining to androgen receptor inhibitors, androgen inhibition, apalutamide, darolutamide, enzalutamide, CV, and CaP.ResultsWe found literature describing the relationship between androgen inhibition and CV disease and risks. Given the increased risk of CV disease due to exposure to gonadotropic releasing hormone agonist therapy alone, understanding the potential for additional CV risks is important for patients with CV comorbidities when an androgen receptor inhibitor is added to their treatment. Another important consideration is the possibility of drug-drug interactions with comedications.ConclusionManagement strategies for patients with mCRPC also treated for comorbidities including CV disease require appropriate selection of therapy, diet, and exercise to meet the needs of the individual patient profile.     

Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: Outcomes from a whole-of-population Australian cohort

PurposeWe aim to describe the treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) outcomes in patients receiving trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (HER2+MBC) in routine clinical care.MethodsRetrospective, whole-of-population cohort study of people initiating T-DM1 for HER2+MBC between October 2015 and May 2019 in Australia. We used dispensing claims to estimate time-to-T-DM1 initiation, duration of treatment, and treatments administered prior to and following T-DM1 therapy. We estimated OS from T-DM1 initiation and stratified results based on whether patients received first- or second-line T-DM1 treatment. We benchmarked outcomes to those reported in the pivotal, EMILIA trial.Results345 patients initiated T-DM1: 309 as second-line therapy for HER2+MBC and 36 as first-line therapy. 51% of patients had received endocrine therapy and 98% of second-line patients received pertuzumab prior to starting T-DM1. The median age was 57 years (53 in EMILIA); median time-to-T-DM1 initiation from start of HER2-targeted therapy for HER2+MBC was 11.6 months (IQR: 7.9–16.6); median duration of T-DM1 treatment was 6.5 months (3.1–13.5; 7.6 months in EMILIA), and median OS was 19.3 months (7.9–29.5; 29.9 months in EMILIA).ConclusionsOur findings highlight differences in patient characteristics (older, more previous pertuzumab therapy) and outcomes (shorter OS) from the T-DM1 pivotal trial and provide real-world estimates that can inform patient, clinician and policy, decisions around the use of HER2-targeted therapies in routine clinical care.     

A multicenter study assessing survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with and without cytoreductive nephrectomy

BackgroundCytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) was called into question following the publication of the CARMENA trial. While previous retrospective studies have supported CN alongside targeted therapies, there is minimal research establishing its role in conjunction with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy.ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between CN and oncological outcomes in patients with mRCC treated with immunotherapy.Materials and methodsA multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with mRCC between 2000 and 2020 who were treated at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance and The Ohio State University and who were treated with ICI systemic therapy (ST) at any point in their disease course. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan Meier analyses. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models evaluated associations with mortality.ResultsThe study cohort consisted of 367 patients (CN+ST n = 232, ST alone n = 135). Among patients undergoing CN, 30 were deferred. Median survivor follow-up was 28.4 months. ICI therapy was first-line in 28.1%, second-line in 17.4%, and third or subsequent line (3L+) in 54.5% of patients. Overall, patients who underwent CN+ST had longer median OS (56.3 months IQR 50.2–79.8) compared to the ST alone group (19.1 months IQR 12.8–23.8). Multivariable analyses demonstrated a 67% reduction in risk of all-cause mortality in patients who received CN+ST vs. ST alone (P < 0.0001). Similar results were noted when first-line ICI therapy recipients were examined as a subgroup. Upfront and deferred CN did not demonstrate significant differences in OS.ConclusionsCN was independently associated with longer OS in patients with mRCC treated with ICI in any line of therapy. Our data support consideration of CN in well selected patients with mRCC undergoing treatment with ICI.     

The effectiveness of the TAX 327 nomogram in predicting overall survival in Chinese patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Based on the results of TAX 327, a nomogram was developed to predict the overall survival of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer （mCRPC） after first-line chemotherapy. The nomogram, however, has not been validated in an independent dataset, especially in a series out of clinical trials. Thus, the objective of the current study was to validate the TAX 327 nomogram in a community setting in China. A total of 146 patients with mCRPC who received first-line chemotherapy （docetaxel or mitoxantrone） were identified. Because clinical trials are limited in mainland China, those patients did not receive investigational treatment after the failure of first-line chemotherapy. The predicted overall survival rate was calculated from the TAX 327 nomogram. The validity of the model was assessed with discrimination, calibration and decision curve analysis. The median survival of the cohort was 21 months （docetaxel） and 19 months （mitoxantrone） at last follow-up. The predictive c-index of the TAX 327 nomogram was 0.66 （95% CI： 0.54-0.70）. The calibration plot demonstrated that the 2-year survival rate was underestimated by the nomogram. Decision curve analysis showed a net benefit of the nomogram at a threshold probability greater than 30%. In conclusion, the present validation study did not confirm the predictive value of the TAX 327 nomogram in a contemporary community series of men in China, and further studies with a large sample size to develop or validate nomograms for predicting survival and selecting therapies in advanced prostate cancer are necessary.     

Patients and physician satisfaction of Degarelix in androgen deprivation therapy for advanced hormone-dependent prostate cancer in the Netherlands

Background:To explore the effectiveness and safety of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, Degarelix, for the treatment of advanced hormone-dependent prostate cancer (PCa) in a real-world setting.Methods:In this noninterventional study, patients with advanced hormone-dependent PCa were included. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) failure defined as either prostate-specific antigen failure, additional therapy related to PCa, or death. Secondary endpoints included patient and physician satisfaction scores, urinary symptoms, and adverse events (AEs).Results:Of 274 patients with PCa, 271 received at least 1 dose of Degarelix. At a median follow-up of 12.2 (interquartile range 6.2–22.0) months, 148 patients (60.2%) had PFS failure. Thirty-five patients (13%) withdrew from the study due to AEs, 23 patients (8.4%) died, and 36 patients (13%) completed 3 years’ follow-up. Urinary symptoms significantly decreased over time. In the safety population, 87.8% of patients reported AEs, with injection-site reactions commonly reported. The majority of physicians and patients considered the therapy satisfactory and well tolerated.Conclusions:In this observational study, Degarelix treatment was well accepted by men with advanced hormone-dependent PCa. Compared with phase III studies, a higher proportion of patients had PFS failure, possibly due to the inclusion of men with more advanced disease in the current study, and more men reported AEs.