Initial experience and cancer detection rates of office-based transperineal magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy under local anesthesia

IntroductionWe aimed to demonstrate feasibility and cancer detection rates of office-based ultrasound-guided transperineal magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound (MRI-US) fusion (TFB) prostate biopsy under local anesthesia.MethodsWith institutional review board approval, records of men undergoing TFB in the office setting under local anesthesia were reviewed. Baseline patient characteristics, MRI findings, cancer detection rates, and complications were recorded. The PrecisionPoint Transperineal Access System (Perineologic, Cumberland, MD, U.S.), along with UroNav 3.0 image-fusion system (Invivo International, Best, The Netherlands) were used for all procedures. Following biopsy, men were surveyed to assess patient experience.ResultsBetween January 2019 and February 2020, 200 TFBs were performed, of which 141 (71%) were positive for prostate cancer, with 117 (83%) Gleason grade group 2 or higher. A total of 259 of 265 MRI lesions were biopsied, with 127 (49%) positive overall. Prostate Imaging–Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4–5 lesions were positive for prostate cancer in 59% of cases. The mean procedural time was 20 minutes, with a patient enter-to-exit room time of 54 minutes. There were no septic complications, no patients required post-procedure hospital admission, and all procedures were successfully completed. Seventy-five percent of patients surveyed reported complete resolution of pain at three days following the procedure.ConclusionsOffice-based TFB represents a viable approach to prostate cancer detection following prostate MRI. Larger-scale assessment is needed to categorize cancer detection rates more accurately by PI-RADs subset, patient selection factors, complication rate, and cost relative to TFB under anesthesia.     

Preoperative prostate biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: reliability in detecting prostate cancer

Purpose

The aim of the study was to analyse and compare the ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp–MRI) and prostate biopsy (PB) to correctly identify tumor foci in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa).

Materials and Methods

157 patients with clinically localised PCa with a PSA <10 ng/mL and a negative DRE diagnosed on the first (12 samples, Group A) or second (18 samples, Group B) PB were enrolled at our institution. All patients underwent mp-MRI with T2-weighted images, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI prior to RP. A map of comparison describing each positive biopsy sample was created for each patient, with each tumor focus shown on the MRI and each lesion present on the definitive histological examination in order to compare tumor detection and location. The sensitivity of mp-MRI and PB for diagnosis was compared using Student’s t-test. The ability of the two exams to detect the prevalence of Gleason pattern 4 in the identified lesions was compared using a chi-square test.

Results

Overall sensitivity of PB and mp-MRI to identify tumor lesion was 59.4% and 78.9%, respectively (p<0.0001). PB missed 144/355 lesions, 59 of which (16.6%) were significant. mp-MRI missed 75/355 lesions, 12 of which (3.4%) were significant. No lesions with a GS≥8 were missed. Sensitivity of PB and mp-MRI to detect the prevalence of Gleason pattern 4 was 88.2% and 97.4%, respectively.

Conclusions

mp-MRI seems to identify more tumor lesions than PB and to provide more information concerning tumor characteristics.     

The utility of in-bore multiparametric magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in men with negative multiparametric magnetic resonance-ultrasound software-based fusion targeted biopsy

ObjectivesTo evaluate the utility of in-bore multiparametric magnetic resonance-guided biopsy of the prostate (IB) in patients with visible lesion/s and previous negative software-based multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-targeted biopsy of the prostate (FTB).Patients and methodsWe retrospectively analysed prospectively maintained database including consecutive men undergoing IB from March 2013 to October 2017 in 2 European centres expert in this procedure. We selected men with the following criteria: No previous treatment for prostate cancer (CaP), multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) lesion(s) PIRADS score ≥ 3, FTB showing no clinically significant cancer (csCaP), and subsequent IB. Patient's characteristics, mpMRI findings, biopsy technique, and histopathological results were extracted. The primary outcome was to determine the detection rate of csCaP, defined as any Gleason pattern ≥ 4. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictors of positive findings at IB.ResultsFifty-three men were included. Median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] 64–68), median Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) was 7.6 ng/ml (IQR 5.2–10.9), and median prostate volume was 59 ml (IQR 44–84). Fifty-six lesions with PIRADS score 3 in 9 cases (16%), 4 in 30 cases (54%), and 5 in 17 cases (30%) were detected. FTB was performed in all cases using a transrectal approach with 3 different platforms (Toshiba, Koelis, and Artemis). Median time between FTB and IB was 3 months (IQR 1–7). A median of 2 cores per lesion were collected with IB (IQR 2–3). No cancer, clinically insignificant and clinically significant cancer were found in 33 (59%), 9 (16%), and 14 (25%) targeted lesions, respectively. Median maximum cancer core length and maximum positive percentage were 9 mm (3–13) and 55% (21%–80%). The only predictor of csCaP on IB was prostate volume (P = 0.026) with an ideal cut-off at 70 ml.ConclusionOne in 4 patients with previous negative FTB, IB was able to detect csCaP. According to this study, IB would be of particularly useful in patients with large glands.     

A prospective study of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US)-fusion targeted biopsy and concurrent systematic transperineal biopsy with the average of 18-cores to detect clinically significant prostate cancer

Background

This study compared the detection rates for clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPC) between magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US)-fusion-targeted biopsy (TB), systematic biopsy (SB) and combination of TB and SB.

Methods

This prospective study evaluated simultaneous TB and SB for consecutive patients with suspicious lesions that were detected using pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI. A commercially available real-time virtual sonography system was used to perform the MRI/US-fusion TB with the transperineal technique. The prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2) was assigned to categorize the suspicious lesions.

Results

A total of 177 patients were included in this study. The detection rate for CSPC was higher using SB, compared to TB (57.1% vs 48.0%, p?=?0.0886). The detection rate for CSPC was higher using the combination of TB and SB, compared to only SB (63.3% vs 57.1%, p?=?0.2324). Multivariate analysis revealed that PIRADS v2 category 4 and an age of <65 years were independent predictors for TB upgrading (vs. the SB result).

Conclusions

PI-RADS v2 category 4 and an age of <65 years were predictive factors of upgrading the Gleason score by MRI/US-fusion TB. Thus, MRI/US-fusion TB may be appropriate for patients with those characteristics.

Trial registration

This study was retrospectively registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMINID000025911) in Jan 30, 2017.

     

Feasibility of transperineal prostate biopsy under interventional magnetic resonance guidance

A patient, who was not suited for ultrasound-guided biopsy, was biopsied in an interventional magnetic resonance unit at Brigham and Women's Hospital. Real-time magnetic resonance imaging provided verification of placement before tissue samples were taken. This technique successfully sampled tissue from the prostate and led to a diagnosis of cancer.