Breast Cancer Heterogeneity: Need to Review Current Treatment Strategies

Although the heterogeneity of breast cancer has long been recognized, the hierarchical organization and existence of tumor initiating subpopulation within breast tumors was not known until the last decade. These tumor initiating cells called cancer stem cells (CSCs) display features of stem cells such as unlimited ability to self-renew and lineage differentiation. Accumulating evidence now suggests that by virtue of their relative resistance to both radiation and chemotherapy, these cells contribute to resistance and relapse following therapy. Utilizing cell cultures and mouse xenograft models, we and others demonstrated that breast CSCs have far greater invasive and metastatic potential than differentiated tumor cells which comprise the tumor bulk. Altogether, these studies suggest that targeting and elimination of breast CSCs may be required to improve patient outcome. In this review, we will discuss recent developments in breast CSC research and advances in CSC specific targeted therapies that are in preclinical and clinical trials.     

Breast Cancer Stem Cells and Their Role in Resistance to Endocrine Therapy

Developmentally, tumours can be viewed as aberrant versions of normal tissues. For example, tumours often retain differentiation markers of their tissue of origin. In addition, there is evidence that they contain cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) that drive tumourigenesis. In this review, we summarise current evidence that breast CSCs may partially explain endocrine resistance in breast cancer. In normal breast, the stem cells are known to possess a basal phenotype and to be mainly oestrogen receptor-α-negative (ER-). If the hierarchy in breast cancer reflects this, the breast CSC may be endocrine resistant because it expresses very little ER and can only respond to treatment by virtue of paracrine signalling from neighbouring, differentiated ER+ tumour cells. Normal breast epithelial stem cells are regulated by the epidermal growth factor receptor and other growth factor receptor signals. The observed increase in growth factor receptor expression in endocrine-resistant breast cancers may reflect a bigger proportion of CSCs selected by endocrine therapies. There is evidence from a number of studies that breast CSCs are ER- and EGR+/HER2+, which would support this view. It is reported that CSCs express mesenchymal genes, which are suppressed by ER expression, further indicating the mutual exclusion between ER+ cells and the CSCs. As we learn more about CSCs, differentiation and the expression and functional activity of the ER in these cells in diverse breast tumour sub-types, it is hoped that our understanding will lead to new modalities to overcome the problem of endocrine resistance in the clinic.     

Innovative Therapeutic Strategies Targeting Colorectal Cancer Stem Cells

Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related death. Although many advances in the treatment of this disease have been made, a large number of patients develop metastasis and resistance to current therapies. The current evidence indicates that cancer stem cells (CSCs) and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) have crucial roles in colorectal carcinogenesis and metastasis. It is also very important to understand the mechanisms that allow the survival of CSCs, such as metabolic reprogramming, which permits them to obtain specific properties or the activation of alternative signaling pathways in response to first-line therapies. In this review, we discuss the failure of conventional therapies for colorectal cancer and provide a brief analysis of new therapeutic strategies for targeting non-responsive CSC. We highlight the use of combination therapies, such as horizontal or vertical targeting, as the most efficient strategy for eradicating these subpopulations of cancer cells.     

Cancer stem cell hypothesis and gastric carcinogenesis: Experimental evidence and unsolved questions

Traditionally, the clonal evolution model has been used to explain gastric cancer (GC) growth dynamics. According to this model, GC cells result from multiple mutations over time resulting in a population of continually diversifying cells. This heterogeneity enables the survival of different clones under particular conditions allowing growth at metastatic locations or resistance to chemotherapeutics. Cancer stem cell (CSC) theory completely overturns this traditional understanding of cancer suggesting that only CSCs can self-renew and promote tumor growth. CSCs are relatively refractory to conventional therapies, thus explaining why anti-cancer therapies are far from curative and why relapses of cancer are frequent. The identification of the CSC component of a tumor might, thus, open new therapeutic perspective based on the selective targeting of this small population of cells. In this review we examine the current scientific evidence supporting the existence of CSC in gastric tumors and analyze the main unsolved questions of this difficult field of cancer research.     

Phenotypic Screening Reveals Topoisomerase I as a Breast Cancer Stem Cell Therapeutic Target

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a subpopulation generally thought to be responsible for cancer initiation and progression. Because CSCs are often rare in the total tumor cell population and differentiate rapidly when grown in culture, it has been challenging to uncover compounds that selectively target CSCs. We previously described CSC-emulating cells derived from breast cancer cell lines that maintained a stable undifferentiated state. We optimized a phenotypic assay with these cells and screened 1,280-bioactive compounds, identifying five that preferentially inhibited CSC-like cell proliferation. Using a compound-guided target identification approach, we found high topoisomerase I (Topo I) expression levels in breast CSC-like cells and primary breast CSCs. Structurally unrelated small molecules targeting Topo I preferentially inhibited CSC-like cells. These results illustrate the substantial power of this CSC phenotypic screening platform and promote Topo I as a potential molecular therapeutic target for therapies aimed at expunging CSCs.     

Cancer Stem Cells as Mediators of Treatment Resistance in Brain Tumors: Status and Controversies

Malignant primary brain tumors are characterized by a short median survival and an almost 100% tumor-related mortality. Despite the addition of new chemotherapy regimes, the overall survival has improved marginally, and radiotherapy is only transiently effective, illustrating the profound impact of treatment resistance on prognosis. Recent studies suggest that a small subpopulation of cancer stem cells (CSCs) has the capacity to repopulate tumors and drive malignant progression and mediate radio- and chemoresistance. This implies that future therapies should turn from the elimination of the rapidly dividing, but differentiated tumor cells, to specifically targeting the minority of tumor cells that repopulate the tumor. Although there exists some support for the CSC hypothesis, there remain many uncertainties regarding theoretical, technical, and interpretational aspects of the data supporting it. If correct, the CSC hypothesis could have profound implications for the way tumors are classified and treated. In this review of the literature, we provide original data and hypotheses supporting alternative explanations and outline some of the therapeutic implications that can be derived.     

Implications of cancer stem cells in the treatment of cancer

Identification of cancer stem cells (CSCs) in both hematological and solid malignancies suggests that CSCs may be a common phenomenon for most malignancies. Similarly to normal stem cells, CSCs can self-renew and differentiate into progeny cancer cells. Almost all current therapy against cancer targets differentiated cancer cells. CSCs are more resistant to therapy secondary to quiescence, increased expression of antiapoptotic proteins and drug efflux transporters. In this article, we review the current status of CSC research and propose the targeting of CSC cell-surface molecules, signal transduction pathways, the stem cell niche, stem cell differentiation and drug resistance.     

Cancer Stem Cells and Response to Therapy

The cancer stem cell (CSC) model states that cancers are organized in cellular hierarchies, which explains the functional heterogeneity often seen in tumors. Like normal tissue stem cells, CSCs are capable of self-renewal,either by symmetric or asymmetric cell division, and have the exclusive ability to reproduce malignant tumors indefinitely. Current systemic cancer therapies frequently fail to eliminate advanced tumors, which may be dueto their inability to effectively target CSC populations. It has been shown that embryonic pathways such as Wnt, Hedgehog, and Notch control self-renewal and cell fate decisions of stem cells and progenitor cells. These are evolutionary conserved pathways, involved in CSC maintenance. Targeting these pathways may be effective in eradicating CSCs and preventing chemotherapy or radiotherapy resistance.     

Cellules souches du cancer du sein : prendre le cancer à la racine

In cancer stem cell (CSC) hypothesis, tumors are organized in a hierarchical model with CSC at the top of the hierarchy. CSCs display both stem cell properties (self-renewal and differentiation) and specific tumoral properties (tumorigenicity, metastatic capacity, resistance to conventional therapies). Recent works on breast cancer allow CSCs isolation and help deciphering CSC biology and targeting with specific therapies. In clinical trials, CSC biology has to be taken into account and the criteria to judge therapeutic efficiency have to change.     

Stem cells in breast tumours: Are they ready for the clinic?

The concept of stem-like cells in cancer has been gaining currency over the last decade or so since evidence for stem cell activity in human leukaemia and solid tumours, including breast cancer, was first published. The evidence established that sub-populations of cells identified by antibodies to cell surface markers behaved like developmental stem cells in their capacity to re-grow the human tumour for several generations in experimental immune-deficient hosts. The experiments established that cells with tumourigenic capacity expressed ‘cancer stem cell’ (CSC) markers and that activity could also be measured by self-renewal of tumour sphere colonies in culture. In breast and other cancers, there is good evidence that CSCs are relatively resistant to radio- and chemotherapy indicating that novel CSC-targeted therapies are needed. Several pathways are promising targets in breast CSCs. There are several ways of combating CSC activity including inducing their apoptosis, inhibiting stem cell self-renewal to either stop their division or to promote their differentiation, or targeting the CSC niche that supports them. The first challenge for developing novel CSC therapies is to ascertain which of these CSC properties is being targeted. The second challenge is to determine suitable CSC biomarkers to measure the efficacy of the novel CSC therapies. We propose using biomarkers as a means to identify and assess CSC activity in clinical trials. This is likely to be demanding but feasible in the near future. Thus, we asked if CSCs are ready for the clinic, however, the emerging question becomes: is the clinic ready for cancer stem cells?     

Cancer stem cells and metastasis

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) represent a subpopulation of tumour cells endowed with self-renewal and multi-lineage differentiation capacity but also with an innate resistance to cytotoxic agents, a feature likely to pose major clinical challenges towards the complete eradication of minimal residual disease in cancer patients. Operationally, CSCs are defined by their tumour-propagating ability when serially transplanted into immune-compromised mice and by their capacity to fully recapitulate the original heterogeneity of cell types observed in the primary lesions they are derived from. CSCs were first identified in haematopoietic malignancies and later in a broad spectrum of solid tumours including those of the breast, colon and brain. Notably, several CSC characteristics are relevant to metastasis, such as motility, invasiveness and, as mentioned above, resistance to DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Here, we have reviewed the current literature on the relation between CSCs and metastasis formation. Preliminary studies on cancer cell lines and patient-derived material suggest a rate-limiting role for stem-like cells in the processes of tumour cell dissemination and metastasis formation. However, additional studies are needed to deliver formal proof of their identity as the cell of origin of recurrences at distant organ sites. Nevertheless, several studies have already provided pre-clinical evidence of the efficacy of novel therapies directed against disseminated CSCs.     

In vitro models of cancer stem cells and clinical applications

Cancer cells, stem cells and cancer stem cells have for a long time played a significant role in the biomedical sciences. Though cancer therapy is more effective than it was a few years ago, the truth is that still none of the current non-surgical treatments can cure cancer effectively. The reason could be due to the subpopulation called “cancer stem cells” (CSCs), being defined as those cells within a tumour that have properties of stem cells: self-renewal and the ability for differentiation into multiple cell types that occur in tumours.The phenomenon of CSCs is based on their resistance to many of the current cancer therapies, which results in tumour relapse. Although further investigation regarding CSCs is still needed, there is already evidence that these cells may play an important role in the prognosis of cancer, progression and therapeutic strategy. Therefore, long-term patient survival may depend on the elimination of CSCs. Consequently, isolation of pure CSC populations or reprogramming of cancer cells into CSCs, from cancer cell lines or primary tumours, would be a useful tool to gain an in-depth knowledge about heterogeneity and plasticity of CSC phenotypes and therefore carcinogenesis. Herein, we will discuss current CSC models, methods used to characterize CSCs, candidate markers, characteristic signalling pathways and clinical applications of CSCs. Some examples of CSC-specific treatments that are currently in early clinical phases will also be presented in this review.     

4EGI-1 targets breast cancer stem cells by selective inhibition of translation that persists in CSC maintenance,proliferation and metastasis

Cancer death is a leading cause of global mortality. An estimated 14.1 million new cancer cases and 8.2 million cancer deaths occurred worldwide in 2012 alone. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) within tumors are essential for tumor metastasis and reoccurrence, the key factors of cancer lethality. Here we report that 4EGI-1, an inhibitor of the interaction between translation initiation factors eIF4E1 and eIF4G1 effectively inhibits breast CSCs through selectively reducing translation persistent in breast CSCs. Translation initiation factor eIF4E1 is significantly enhanced in breast CSCs in comparison to non-CSC breast cancer cells. 4EGI-1 presents increased cytotoxicity to breast CSCs compared to non-CSC breast cancer cells. 4EGI-1 promotes breast CSC differentiation and represses breast CSC induced tube-like structure formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). 4EGI-1 isomers suppress breast CSC tumorangiogenesis and tumor growth in vivo. In addition, 4EGI-1 decreases proliferation in and induces apoptosis into breast CSC tumor cells. Furthermore, 4EGI-1 selectively inhibits translation of mRNAs encoding NANOG, OCT4, CXCR4, c-MYC and VEGF in breast CSC tumors. Our study demonstrated that 4EGI-1 targets breast CSCs through selective inhibition of translation critical for breast CSCs, suggesting that selective translation initiation interference might be an avenue targeting CSCs within tumors.     

Cancer stem cells in hepatocellular carcinoma: Recent progress and perspective

Although the “cancer stem cell (CSC)” hypothesis was first proposed roughly 50 years ago, recent progress in stem cell biology and technologies has successfully achieved the identification of CSCs in a variety of cancers. CSCs are defined as a minor population which possesses a prominent ability to generate new tumors that faithfully reproduce the phenotype of original tumors in xenotransplant assays. Additionally, CSCs are able to self-renew and generate differentiated progenies to organize a hierarchical cell system in a similar fashion to normal stem cells. Although not all types of cancer follow the CSC theory, it provides an attractive cellular mechanism to account for the therapeutic resistance and recurrence of the disease. A minor population with CSC properties has been detected in a number of established hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell lines and extensive analyses characterizing the CSC system in primary HCC samples are now ongoing. Considering that HCC has high rates of recurrence and mortality, novel therapeutic approaches are urgently required. Although the clinical relevance of CSCs remains elusive, deep understanding of the cellular organization of HCC may allow us to develop therapies targeting specific cell types such as CSCs.     

Cancer stem cells in human digestive tract malignancies

Digestive tract malignancies, including oral, pharyngeal, esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancers, are among the top 10 most common cancers worldwide. In spite of using various treatment modalities, cancer patients still suffer from recurrence and metastasis of malignant cells. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are undifferentiated and highly proliferative malignant cells with unique properties mediated by overexpression of stemness markers, metastasis-related proteins, drug transporters, and DNA repair machinery. Due to their salient characteristics, it has been suggested that CSCs are responsible for tumor initiation, progression, invasion, recurrence, and therapy resistance. Exploring different aspects of CSC biology has fueled a great enthusiasm in designing novel therapeutic strategies to help patients. For instance, identification of markers associated with digestive tract CSCs, such as CD44, CD133, CD24, EpCAM, LGR5, ALDH1, and BMI1, has made it possible to develop more accurate diagnosis approaches. In addition, specifically targeting CSCs by their markers imposes fewer side effects and improves therapeutic outcomes. Here, we focus on the current status of CSC biology in digestive tract cancers, with emphasis on CSC markers, and review achieved progress in eradication of digestive tract CSC cells.     

Targeting cancer stem cell-specific markers and/or associated signaling pathways for overcoming cancer drug resistance

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a small subpopulation of tumor cells with capabilities of self-renewal, dedifferentiation, tumorigenicity, and inherent chemo-and-radio therapy resistance. Tumor resistance is believed to be caused by CSCs that are intrinsically challenging to common treatments. A number of CSC markers including CD44, CD133, receptor tyrosine kinase, aldehyde dehydrogenases, epithelial cell adhesion molecule/epithelial specific antigen, and ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2 have been proved as the useful targets for defining CSC population in solid tumors. Furthermore, targeting CSC markers through new therapeutic strategies will ultimately improve treatments and overcome cancer drug resistance. Therefore, the identification of novel strategies to increase sensitivity of CSC markers has major clinical implications. This review will focus on the innovative treatment methods such as nano-, immuno-, gene-, and chemotherapy approaches for targeting CSC-specific markers and/or their associated signaling pathways.     

Urothelial carcinoma: Stem cells on the edge

Tumors are heterogeneous collections of cells with highly variable abilities to survive, grow, and metastasize. This variability likely stems from epigenetic and genetic influences, either stochastic or hardwired by cell type-specific lineage programs. That differentiation underlies tumor cell heterogeneity was elegantly demonstrated in hematopoietic tumors, in which rare primitive cells (cancer stem cells (CSCs)) resembling normal hematopoietic stem cells are ultimately responsible for tumor growth and viability. Because of the compelling clinical implications CSCs pose—across the entire spectrum of cancers—investigators applied the CSC model to cancers arising in tissues with crudely understood differentiation programs. Instead of relying on differentiation, these studies used empirically selected markers and statistical arguments to identify CSCs. The empirical approach has stimulated important questions about “stemness” in cancer cells as well as the validity and stoichiometry of CSC assays. The recent identification of urothelial differentiation programs in urothelial carcinomas (UroCas) supports the idea that solid epithelial cancers (carcinomas) develop and differentiate analogously to normal epithelia and provides new insights about the spatial localization and molecular makeup of carcinoma CSCs. Importantly, CSCs from invasive UroCas (UroCSCs) appear well situated to exchange important signals with adjacent stroma, to escape immune surveillance, and to survive cytotoxic therapy. These signals have potential roles in treatment resistance and many participate in druggable cellular pathways. In this review, we discuss the implications of these findings in understanding CSCs and in better understanding how UroCas form, progress, and should be treated.     

Cancer stem cells: in the line of fire

Most tumours appear to contain a sub-population(s) of self-renewing and expanding stem cells known as cancer stem cells (CSCs). The CSC model proposes that CSCs are at the apex of a hierarchically organized cell population, somewhat akin to normal tissue organization. Selection pressures may also facilitate the stochastic clonal expansion of sub-sets of cancer cells that may co-exist with CSCs and their progeny, moreover the trait of stemness may be more fluid than hitherto expected, and cells may switch between the stem and non-stem cell state. A large body of evidence points to the fact that CSCs are particularly resistant to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. In this review we discuss the basis of such resistance that highlights the roles of ABC transporters, aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity, intracellular signalling pathways, the DNA damage response, hypoxia and proliferative quiescence as being significant determinants. In the light of such observations, we outline strategies for the successful eradication of CSCs, including targeting the self-renewal controlling pathways (Wnt, Notch and Hedgehog), ALDH activity and ABC transporters, blocking epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), differentiation therapy and niche targeting.     

Cancer stem cells: targets and potential biomarkers for radiotherapy

Cancer stem cells (CSC) have the unique ability to cause tumor recurrences if they survive treatment. Radiotherapy has curative potential because it has been functionally shown to sufficiently inactivate CSCs. It is well known that CSCs mediate the radiation resistance of tumors by tumor-specific factors, such as the pretreatment number of CSCs and repopulation or reoxygenation during fractionated radiotherapy. CSCs appear to have a higher intrinsic radioresistance than non-CSCs, a factor that is especially important for the development of predictive biomarkers that, if this finding holds true, can only be successfully established if they are stem-cell specific. Recent clinical data imply that stem-cell-related surface markers may be directly used as predictors for the radiocurability of tumors with comparable risk factors, such as histology and size. Future studies need to address the question of which additional markers need to be considered if more heterogeneous patient collectives are investigated. With the goal of developing a direct targeting approach, investigators are currently evaluating several drugs that are intended to target CSCs by inhibiting stem-cell-related signal transduction pathways. We need to preclinically test such drugs as combined-modality therapies in combination with radiotherapy to evaluate their curative potential, and optimize them by increasing their specificity to CSCs over normal tissue stem cells to avoid increased radiation toxicity.     

The telomerase inhibitor imetelstat depletes cancer stem cells in breast and pancreatic cancer cell lines

Cancer stem cells (CSC) are rare drug-resistant cancer cell subsets proposed to be responsible for the maintenance and recurrence of cancer and metastasis. Telomerase is constitutively active in both bulk tumor cell and CSC populations but has only limited expression in normal tissues. Thus, inhibition of telomerase has been shown to be a viable approach in controlling cancer growth in nonclinical studies and is currently in phase II clinical trials. In this study, we investigated the effects of imetelstat (GRN163L), a potent telomerase inhibitor, on both the bulk cancer cells and putative CSCs. When breast and pancreatic cancer cell lines were treated with imetelstat in vitro, telomerase activity in the bulk tumor cells and CSC subpopulations were inhibited. Additionally, imetelstat treatment reduced the CSC fractions present in the breast and pancreatic cell lines. In vitro treatment with imetelstat, but not control oligonucleotides, also reduced the proliferation and self-renewal potential of MCF7 mammospheres and resulted in cell death after <4 weeks of treatment. In vitro treatment of PANC1 cells showed reduced tumor engraftment in nude mice, concomitant with a reduction in the CSC levels. Differences between telomerase activity expression levels or telomere length of CSCs and bulk tumor cells in these cell lines did not correlate with the increased sensitivity of CSCs to imetelstat, suggesting a mechanism of action independent of telomere shortening for the effects of imetelstat on the CSC subpopulations. Our results suggest that imetelstat-mediated depletion of CSCs may offer an alternative mechanism by which telomerase inhibition may be exploited for cancer therapy.