Behavior of borderline tumors with particular interest to persistence, recurrence, and progression to invasive carcinoma: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: Borderline tumors account for 10% to 20% of epithelial ovarian tumors, and their prognosis is outstanding; nevertheless, a mortality of up to 20% has been reported, particularly in earlier reports. There is a lack of information about the actual mortality and the rate of progression into invasive carcinoma in large and prospectively accrued populations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All women with borderline ovarian tumors undergoing primary surgery in our department or referred within 3 months from surgery performed elsewhere from 1982 to 1997 were prospectively accrued and observed. RESULTS: We studied 339 women (83.4% stage I, 7.9% stage II, and 8.5% stage III). The median age at diagnosis was 39 years. A total of 150 women underwent radical surgery, and 189 underwent fertility-sparing surgery. After surgery, 13 women had macroscopic residual disease. With a median follow-up of 70 months, 317 women are alive with no clinical disease (eight with documented subclinical persistence of implants), three are alive with clinical disease, two died of disease, 10 died of other reasons, and seven women have been lost to follow-up. The recurrence of disease was higher after fertility-sparing surgery (35 of 189 cases) than after radical surgery (seven of 150 cases); nevertheless, all but one woman with recurrence of borderline tumor or progression to carcinoma after conservative surgery were salvaged. We observed seven progressions (2.0%) into invasive carcinoma, five in serous tumors (2.4%), and two in mucinous tumors (1.6%). The disease-free survival is 99.6% in stage I patients, 95.8% in stage II, and 89% in stage III. CONCLUSION: The survival of patients with borderline tumors is higher than previously described in some retrospective studies. Conservative surgery is safe and may be proposed to several patients with early and disseminated disease after thorough discussion of all therapeutic options. Progression to carcinoma is approximately 2% and may be observed in both mucinous and serous tumors.     

The management of borderline tumours of the ovary

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The treatment of borderline ovarian tumours has been similar to that for their invasive counterparts for a long time. However, in view of the good prognosis for borderline ovarian tumours, their occurrence in a younger age group and the development of less invasive techniques, the question can be asked as to whether a more conservative treatment is warranted. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent articles discuss the mode of surgery (laparotomy or laparoscopy), the possibility of fertility-sparing surgery, the need for restaging procedures and adjuvant therapy. SUMMARY: The ultimate goal in treating patients with borderline ovarian cancer is defining those patients with bad prognostic factors and risk for recurrence and who consequently require more aggressive therapy. A proper staging procedure is crucial to estimate the risk. Translational research might help identify borderline tumours with poor prognosis. Fertility-sparing surgery is often a good option in young patients with Fédération International de Gynécologie et Obstétrie (FIGO) stage I disease or in selected cases with noninvasive implants, since long-term survival does not seem to be negatively influenced by conservative surgery.     

Outcomes after conservative treatment of advanced-stage serous borderline tumors of the ovary

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of the largest series of patients treated conservatively for a stage II or III serous borderline ovarian tumor.Materials and methodsFrom 1969 to 2006, 41 patients were treated conservatively for an advanced-stage serous borderline ovarian tumor. Patient outcomes were reviewed.ResultsTwenty patients had undergone a unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, 18 a unilateral cystectomy and two bilateral cystectomy (unknown for one patient). Three patients had invasive implants. The median duration of follow-up was 57 months (range 4–235). The recurrence rate was high (56%), but overall survival remained excellent (100% at 5 years, 92% at 10 years). One death had occurred due to an invasive ovarian recurrence. Eighteen pregnancies (nine spontaneous) were observed in 14 patients.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that spontaneous pregnancies can be achieved after conservative treatment of advanced-stage borderline ovarian tumors (with noninvasive implants) but the recurrence rate is high. Nevertheless, this high rate has no impact on survival. Conservative surgery can be proposed to patients with a borderline tumor of the ovary and noninvasive peritoneal implants. Should infertility persist following treatment of the borderline tumor, an in vitro fertilization procedure can be cautiously proposed.     

Influence of histological subtypes on the risk of an invasive recurrence in a large series of stage I borderline ovarian tumor including 191 conservative treatments

BackgroundThe overall prognosis of stage I borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) is excellent but a small percentage of patients die to their disease. The prognostic factors for such a rare event are still not clearly defined. The aim of this study was to determine these factors for recurrence per se and recurrence in the form of invasive carcinoma in a large series of stage I tumors.MethodsA retrospective review of patients with BOT. Three inclusion criteria were defined: (i) a centralized histological review; (ii) macroscopic stage I tumors; (iii) exclusion of metastatic disease to the ovaries.ResultsFrom 2000 to 2010, 254 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria [140 had mucinous BOT (MBOT) and 114 a serous BOT (SBOT)], and 191 had undergone conservative management. After a median follow-up of 45 months, 43 patients had developed recurrences (31 borderline and 12 invasive).The risks of recurrences were statistically increased after conservative treatment, particularly after a cystectomy, in patients with stage IB and among patients with incompletely staged tumors. In the subgroup of conservatively treated patients (representing 75% of our population), the risks of recurrences were statistically increased in patients affected by a SBOT, in patients who had undergone a cystectomy, in patients with stage IB disease and in patients with a micropapillary pattern (MPP). MBOT and the presence of a MPP were identified as prognostic factors for invasive disease.ConclusionsIn the present series of BOT with the largest number of patients treated conservatively to date, the presence of a MPP and the mucinous subtype were associated with a higher rate of progression to carcinoma after conservative management. These important results suggest that MBOT belong to a ‘high-risk’ group likely to develop an invasive recurrence after fertility-sparing surgery in stage I BOT.     

Pathology of ovarian carcinoma

Serous carcinoma is the most common type of ovarian cancer and usually is associated with peritoneal metastases and poor survival except for meticulously staged patients with tumors confined to the ovaries. Endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas account for most nonserous carcinomas and more often present with low-stage disease; survival for the various cell types is similar when stratified by stage. Borderline ovarian tumors can be subdivided into benign and malignant neoplasms, and in the view of some experts, this renders the borderline category obsolete. Women with typical serous borderline tumors (atypical proliferative serous tumors) constitute most of these patients and have virtually 100% survival, unless invasive peritoneal implants are present. Micropapillary serous carcinomas (a less common variant, also called serous borderline tumor with a micropapillary pattern) and tumors with invasive implants behave similar to low-grade invasive carcinomas.     

Invasive recurrence of an intestinal-type mucinous epithelial neoplasm of low malignant potential: case report and review of the literature

Pseudomyxoma peritonei is only rarely seen in conjunction with primary ovarian tumors. It has been suggested that only ruptured mucinous tumors arising in ovarian mature cystic teratomas can result in this clinical picture. We describe a case of a late invasive recurrence of a mucinous intestinal-type borderline ovarian tumor arising from a mature teratoma after complete surgical debulking. Borderline ovarian tumors behave indolently in the overwhelming majority of cases, and the prognosis is therefore usually outstanding.     

Controversies in borderline ovarian tumors

Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) represent about 15% to 20% of all ovarian malignancies and differ from invasive ovarian cancers (IOCs) by many characters. Historically, standard management of BOT is peritoneal washing cytology, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, complete peritoneal resection of macroscopic lesions; in case of mucinous BOTs, appendectomy should be performed. Because BOTs are often diagnosed at earlier stage, in younger age women and have better prognosis, higher survival rate than IOCs, fertility-sparing surgery is one of the option to preserve childbearing capacity. The study of such conservative surgery is being released, and still controversial. After surgery, pregnancy and ovarian induction followed by in vitro fertilization are also significant issues. In surgery, laparoscopic technique can be used by a gynecologic oncology surgeon. So far postoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormone therapy are not recommended. We will discuss controversial issues of BOTs on this review and present the outline of the management of BOTs.     

Borderline ovarian tumors

Borderline ovarian tumors account for approximately 15% of all epithelial ovarian tumors. In the early 1970s, borderline tumors were categorized as either serous or mucinous with overall survival rates of 75–90%. Since then, it has been recognized that the two categories are heterogonous. There are now many different groups following the recognition of serous tumors with microinvasion, non‐invasive and invasive peritoneal implants and a micropapillary pattern, and of mucinous tumors with microinvasion, intraepithelial carcinoma and pseudomyxoma peritoneal implants, in addition to further delineation of endometrial, clear cell and transitional cell tumors with atypical proliferation. This review outlines the most recent information regarding the epidemiology, pathology and clinical management of borderline tumors. Surgical management to excise all visible tumors remains the cornerstone of therapy. Because borderline ovarian tumors often occur in reproductive‐age women, fertility is an important issue. Conservative surgery is a safe in carefully selected patients. Effective non‐surgical therapies are yet to be identified.     

影响卵巢交界性肿瘤预后和复发因素的临床分析

调查分析卵巢交界性肿瘤治疗后的效果和影响复发的临床及病理因素。回顾性分析我院治疗的50例卵巢交界性肿瘤患者的临床资料和随访资料。年龄、月经、口服避孕药、妊娠情况、手术方式及组织学类型等都是影响肿瘤复发和预后的因素,年龄>30岁、妊娠及分期手术可提高患者无瘤生存率。卵巢交界性肿瘤是一种具有低度恶性潜能的肿瘤,早发现早治疗以及规范的手术方式能达到良好的治疗目的。     

Infertility treatment after conservative management of borderline ovarian tumors

BACKGROUND: Young patients with ovarian tumors of low malignant potential usually undergo conservative surgery because of the excellent prognosis of these tumors. Patients wishing to conceive after diagnosis occasionally require ovulation induction, but data regarding the safety of assisted reproductive technologies in this situation remains anecdotal. The current study analyzes the outcome of a group of patients who received infertility treatment after the conservative management of borderline ovarian tumors. METHODS: The clinical and pathologic records of 104 patients with a borderline tumor of the ovary who were treated and followed over a 20-year period (1979--1999) were reviewed. Forty-three patients who underwent conservative management were the subjects of the current study. RESULTS: Follow-up was available for 95% of the patients, giving a total of 270 women-years of follow-up. Nine of the 43 patients developed a local recurrence, 8 of which occurred in patients with serous tumors. Five of these 9 patients underwent cystectomy only at the time of recurrence, and all were without evidence of disease at a mean follow-up of 75 months (range, 25--93 months). Nineteen patients delivered a total of 25 healthy children after diagnosis of a borderline ovarian tumor; 7 of these patients were treated with in vitro fertilization (IVF) after diagnosis. Four of these patients developed a recurrence, two patients before the IVF treatment and two patients after the IVF treatment. The latter two patients were without evidence of disease at the time of last follow-up (15 months and 26 months, respectively, after the recurrence). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suggest that ovulation induction may be considered after the diagnosis of a borderline ovarian tumor. Recurrences were observed in two of seven patients, all of which remained histologically borderline.     

Prediction of long-term survival by flow cytometric analysis of cellular DNA content in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

The prognostic value of cellular DNA content in ovarian cancer (malignant common epithelial tumors) was investigated by flow cytometric analysis of paraffin-embedded tumor blocks from 128 previously untreated patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III and IV ovarian cancer entered in a prospective clinical trial of combination v sequential therapy with chlorambucil and cisplatin. Seventy-three percent of tumors were aneuploid and 27% were diploid. Multivariate analysis using a Cox model showed that cellular DNA content (P less than .001) and FIGO stage (P less than .02) were the only significant independent prognostic variables. The median survival was 13 months for patients with aneuploid tumors and 60 months for patients with diploid tumors (P less than .0001). Further analysis indicated that the good prognosis associated with diploid tumors was limited to patients with stage III disease, all patients with stage IV (spread beyond the peritoneal cavity or liver metastases) disease having a poor prognosis irrespective of ploidy. On pathological review, nine borderline ovarian tumors (of low malignant potential) were identified, and seven of these were diploid. These tumors have an unusually favorable prognosis, despite apparent dissemination within the peritoneal cavity, a paradox which is often difficult to explain using conventional histological criteria. Although the vast majority of tumors in this study (93%) were classified as invasive epithelial ovarian cancers, it is possible that some of the patients with stage III diploid tumors may have had malignancies that were predominantly of low malignant potential, thus accounting in part for the prognostic significance of DNA content. By incorporating flow cytometric DNA analysis with careful histopathological assessment, it may be possible to better identify patients with an inherently good prognosis. This assumes particular importance, as the relatively favorable prognosis of patients with stage III diploid ovarian tumors appears to be independent of the type of treatment.     

Serous borderline tumors of the ovary. A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and quantitative study of 44 cases.

The clinicopathologic features of 44 serous borderline tumors (SBT) of the ovary were evaluated. Nineteen were Stages II and III, and 9 had invasive peritoneal implants. All 19 patients received chemotherapy and 4, who had invasive implants, died of disease after 3, 4.3, 8, and 9 years. The other 25 patients were free of tumor 1-14 years (mean, 5.3 years) after surgery. Coexpression of low molecular weight keratins (AE1, CAM 5.2) and vimentin was found in all tumors and their implants. No significant differences were found between SBT with different volume-corrected mitotic indices (M/Vi) with respect to gross features, presence or absence of implants, stage, and survival. Cytometric DNA analysis also was performed on the primary ovarian tumors and the implants. Twenty-one primary tumors had diploid or tetraploid histograms, and 23 had aneuploid histograms. DNA ploidy of the primary ovarian tumors did not correlate with gross features, the presence or absence of implants, M/Vi, stage, and survival. The data from this study confirm that most SBT are clinically benign, but SBT with invasive implants may behave aggressively. Expression of intermediate filaments, M/Vi, and DNA ploidy evaluation of the primary ovarian tumors seem to be of no value in predicting prognosis. However, four of seven patients with aneuploid DNA implants died of tumor.     

Clinical outcome and risk factors for recurrence in borderline ovarian tumours

We investigated the long-term prognosis of borderline ovarian tumours and determined risk factors for recurrence. One hundred and twenty-one borderline ovarian tumours treated between 1994 and 2003 at the participating institutions in the Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit were retrospectively investigated for clinical stage, histopathological subtype, surgical technique, postoperative chemotherapy, the presence or absence of recurrence, and prognosis. The median follow-up period was 57 months (1-126 months). One hundred and nine cases (90.6%) were at clinical stage I. The histopathological subtypes consisted of 91 cases of mucinous tumour (75.2%), 27 cases of serous tumour (22.3%), and three cases of endometrioid tumour. Conservative surgery was used in 53 cases (43.8%), radical surgery in 68 cases (56.2%), a staging laparotomy in 43 cases (35.5%), and postoperative adjuvant therapy in 30 cases (24.8%). Recurrence was found in eight cases, but no tumour-related deaths were reported. Although no significant difference in disease-free survival rate was seen between different clinical stages, the difference in disease-free survival rate between serous and non-serous (mucinous and endometrioid) types was significant (P<0.05). The 10-year disease-free survival rate was 89.1% for the radical surgery group and 57.4% for the conservative surgery group -- this difference was significant (P<0.05). In the conservative surgery group, cystectomy and serous tumour were independent risk factors for recurrence. Although recurrence was observed, the long-term prognosis of borderline ovarian tumour was favourable, without tumour-related deaths. Considering the favourable prognosis, conservative surgery can be chosen as far as the patient has a non-serous tumour and receive adnexectomy. However, in cases of serous type and/or receiving cystectomy special care should be given as relative risk rates of recurrence elevate by 2-4-folds.     

Characterization of ovarian cancer survival by histotype and stage: A nationwide study in Norway

Contemporary population-based data on ovarian cancer survival using current subtype classifications and by surgical status are sparse. We evaluated 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year relative (and overall) survival, and excess hazards in patients with borderline tumors or invasive epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed 2012 to 2021 in a nationwide registry-based cohort in Norway. Outcomes were evaluated by histotype, FIGO stage, cytoreduction surgery and residual disease. Overall survival was evaluated for non-epithelial ovarian cancer. Survival of women with borderline ovarian tumors was excellent (≥98.0% 7-year relative survival). Across all evaluated invasive epithelial ovarian cancer histotypes, 7-year relative survival for cases diagnosed with stages I or II disease was ≥78.3% (stage II high-grade serous). Survival for ovarian cancers diagnosed at stage ≥III differed substantially by histotype and time since diagnosis (eg, stage III, 5-year relative survival from 27.7% [carcinosarcomas] to 76.2% [endometrioid]). Overall survival for non-epithelial cases was good (91.8% 5-year overall survival). Women diagnosed with stage III or IV invasive epithelial ovarian cancer and with residual disease following cytoreduction surgery had substantially better survival than women not operated. These findings were robust to restriction to women with high reported functional status scores. Patterns for overall survival were similar to those for relative survival. We observed relatively good survival with early stage at diagnosis even for the high grade serous histotype. Survival for patients diagnosed at stage ≥III invasive epithelial ovarian cancer was poor for all but endometrioid disease. There remains an urgent need for strategies for risk reduction and earlier detection, together with effective targeted treatments.     

Management and prognosis of endometrioid borderline tumors of the ovary

BackgroundThe Endometrioid Borderline ovarian tumor (EBOT) is the third most common histological subtype of borderline ovarian tumors. Very little is known about the prognosis and management of this entity. This paper consists of a review of the literature and an analysis of clinical series.Study designA review of the literature on this topic was conducted identifying series reporting consecutive cases of EBOT using 2 search engines (MEDLINE and Pubmed). Personal data on this topic have been included and concern a series of patients treated between 1985 and 2009 for EBOT. These cases included in this series had complete data concerning patient management and follow-up > 12 months.Results16 patients were studied: 7 had been treated conservatively and 9 radically. All 16/16 patients had stage I disease at the initial diagnosis but one patient had also developed synchronous endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterine corpus. After a median time of 24 months (range, 12–132) post treatment, one (1/16) patient had developed two recurrences. She remains disease-free 42 months after the end of treatment of the last recurrence. These data were compared to the results of 4 series previously reported in the literature. In fact, the present series reports on the first recurrence in EBOT (which was an invasive lesion).ConclusionEndometrioid borderline ovarian tumors carry a good prognosis. Most EBOT tumors are stage I, therefore surgical staging is not necessary in most of the cases. However, uterine curettage is required in cases of uterine preservation.     

Conservative management of malignant and borderline ovarian tumor

Conservative management of at least a part of one ovary and the uterus, in order to preserve fertility-potential, could be propose in most of patients with nonepithelial and borderline ovarian tumor. This conservative management could be performed even in patients with borderline ovarian tumor associated with noninvasive peritoneal implants (if complete resection of peritoneal disease). A removal of the preserved ovary after completion of the pregnancy(ies) is not necessary if patients agree to a careful follow-up procedure. In patient with epithelial ovarian cancer, conservative management could be performed only in case of young patients who desire to preserve fertility function with: unilateral tumor (stage IA), grade 1 (and 2?), who underwent an adequate staging surgery (including peritoneal washings, omentectomy, multiple peritoneal biopsies, uterine curettage and complete pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy) and with a careful follow-up. A conservative management should not be performed in patients with tumor stage > IA and/or grade 3. Removal of preserved ovary should be performed after completion of pregnancy(ies) in order to reduce the risk of ovarian recurrence.     

Immunohistochemical staining of GLUT1 in benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian epithelia

BACKGROUND: Aberrant expression of the facilitative glucose transporter GLUT1 is found in a wide spectrum of epithelial malignancies. The authors describe an immunohistochemical study of GLUT1 expression in benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian epithelia. METHODS: One hundred forty one formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections were immunostained with rabbit anti-GLUT1 using the streptavidin-biotin method. The samples were as follows: 3 endometriotic cysts, 9 serous cystadenomas, 15 mucinous cystadenomas, 17 noninvasive borderline implants, 3 invasive borderline implants, and 3 endosalpingiosis. In addition, 35 borderline tumors (26 serous, 7 mucinous, 2 seromucinous) and 56 adenocarcinomas (50 serous, 4 endometrioid, 2 mucinous) were stained. RESULTS: Benign serous and mucinous cystadenomas and endosalpingiosis were non-staining with GLUT1 antiserum. Twenty-eight of 35 borderline tumors (80%) stained positively, with weak to moderate (1-2+ out of 3) staining intensity and focal or patchy distribution. Seventeen noninvasive serous borderline implants were negatively stained; however, three invasive serous borderline implants were positively stained with GLUT1 antiserum. Fifty four of 56 ovarian carcinomas (96%) stained positively, with moderate to strong (2-3+ out of 3) intensity and multifocal distribution. CONCLUSIONS: GLUT1 is a consistent marker of ovarian epithelial malignancy. GLUT1 staining is absent in benign ovarian epithelial tumors, and shows progressively more staining in invasive tumors as compared to borderline tumors. Anti-GLUT1 antibody may be useful in distinguishing invasive from noninvasive serous borderline implants.     

Invasive and noninvasive implants in ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential

Ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential ("borderline" serous tumors) are classified according to the histologic features of the primary ovarian tumor, without regard to any coexisting extraovarian disease. The peritoneal implants display a range of histologic appearances, ranging from benign glands (endosalpingiosis), to noninvasive papillary glandular proliferations resembling the ovarian neoplasms, to irregular glands associated with a desmoplastic stroma and having features of invasive disease. This review of 16 patients with histologically documented extraovarian tumor implants seen at Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, and 13 patients whose tumor implants have been previously described in the literature indicates that the clinical stage of disease has much greater prognostic significance than does the implant histologic features. There is a tendency for patients with more advanced disease to have invasive implants. However, within a given clinical stage, disease progression or recurrence was not influenced by the presence or absence of invasive histologic characteristics in the tumor implants.     

保守性手术对交界性卵巢肿瘤预后及生育功能的影响

目的；研究首次行保守手术后交界性卵巢肿瘤（BOT）患者的生育功能和疾病结局。方法：对自1990年1月－2000年5月在我院住院43例符合筛选条件的BOT患者行问卷调查及回顾性病例分析，采用SAS软件包对数据进行处理。结果：43例病人中，41例病人完成问卷调查，26例为浆液性交界性卵巢肿瘤（SBOT）；17例为粘液性交界性卵巢肿瘤（MBOT），平均随访时间是63个月，术后无肿瘤复发29例，肿瘤复发14例（包括1例死于肿瘤复发，1例死于其它疾病），平均复发时间是术后39．3个月。卵巢肿瘤剥除术后肿瘤复发率58．3％（7／12），而卵巢切除术后肿瘤复发率22．6％（7／31），两者差异有显著性（Fisher精确概率P＝0．0351），但保守手术后肿瘤复发死亡率并不高于根治性手术（P＝0．64），术后24例有生育愿望的妇女，12例获得妊娠，妊娠年龄范围23－34岁，平均25岁，结论：保守手术可作为BOT患者的一种治疗选择；尽管术后肿瘤复发率较高（33％，14／43），尤其是行卵巢肿瘤剥除术的病人，但肿瘤复发死亡率并未增加；术后有妊娠愿望者能够再次妊娠并分娩正常后代。     

Prognostic significance of p53 expression in advanced-stage ovarian serous borderline tumors.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency of p53 overexpression in the primary ovarian tumors of patients with stages II and III serous borderline tumors (SBTs) and to determine the relationship between p53 overexpression and risk of progression/recurrence and survival. Of 112 patients with stages II-IV SBTs, paraffin-embedded tissue from the primary ovarian tumor was available in 68 cases. Immunohistochemical staining for p53 was performed. Clinical information was abstracted from the medical records. The major end points selected for analysis were time to progression/relapse, disease-free survival, overall survival, and cause-specific survival. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were also performed. The median patient age was 37 years (range, 17-67 years). Twenty-two patients had stage II disease, and 46 had stage III disease. The mean follow-up time was 105 months. Nineteen patients (28%) had either disease progression (1 patient) or relapse (18 patients). Eleven patients died: 10 patients died of their tumor, and 1 patient died of other causes. Thirteen cases (19%) had positive immunostaining for p53. Overexpression of p53 was significantly associated with an increased probability of progression/recurrence (P = 0.005) and a decreased overall survival (P = 0.012). After adjusting for age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, the presence of residual tumor, and the presence of invasive implants, patients whose tumors overexpressed p53 had a 4-fold increased risk of progression/ recurrence. Similarly, women whose tumor overexpressed p53 had an approximately 6-fold increased risk of death. p53 overexpression in the ovarian tumors of patients with stage II and III SBTs is significantly associated with increased probability of relapse and decreased overall survival. This information should provide better prognostic data to patients and their families and allow us to select patients who might benefit from postoperative treatment.