Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Kerboull Acetabular Reinforcement Device and Structural Allograft for Severe Defects of the Acetabulum

Background

The purpose of this study is to review our experience with Kerboull reinforcement device combined with bulk allograft for management of severe acetabular defects.

Midterm Survivorship After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Custom Triflange Acetabular Component

Background

Custom triflange acetabular components are being increasingly used for the reconstruction of Paprosky type IIIB acetabular defects. However, midterm survivorship data are lacking.

Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Kerboull-Type Acetabular Reinforcement Device for Rapidly Destructive Coxarthrosis

We studied 20 primary cemented total hip arthroplasties performed using Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device for rapidly destructive coxarthrosis. The average patient age at the time of surgery was 68.3 (range, 60-77) years. The mean follow-up period was 6.3 years (3.8-11.8). The mean preoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association hip score was 38.1 (16-70) vs 85.2 (70-93) at the latest follow-up. The radiographic outcome in 20 hips showed no migration or aseptic loosening. A partial radiolucent line at the cement-bone interface was noted in 2 hips (10%), but no progression occurred. There were no major complications. No patient required repeated surgery. The use of Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device for rapidly destructive coxarthrosis provided satisfactory 3-year to 11-year clinical and radiographic results.     

Restoration of the Center of Rotation in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

We measured the change of the center of hip rotation after the revision of acetabular loosening using an acetabular reconstruction ring and an impaction allogenic bone grafting. Thirty-five revision total hip arthroplasties were performed. The average follow-up was 3.8 years. Horizontal distance was changed from 34.01 ± 10 mm preoperatively to 41.07 ± 6 mm at the latest follow-up. Vertical distance was changed from 32.06 ± 9 mm preoperatively to 20.21 ± 7 mm at the latest follow-up. The Harris hip score was improved from an average of 47 in the preoperative period to 86 at the final follow-up. The restoration of the anatomical hip center has shown to be favorable in terms of functional and radiologic evaluation in total hip revision.     

Acetabular Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision: A Summary of Operative Factors,Outcomes, and Comparison of Approaches

BackgroundRevision total hip arthroplasty (THA) presents a greater risk to patients than primary THA, and surgical approach may impact outcomes. This study aimed to summarize acetabular revisions at our institution and to compare outcomes between direct anterior and posterior revision THA.MethodsA series of 379 acetabular revision THAs performed from January 2010 through August 2022 was retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative factors were summarized for all revisions and compared between direct anterior and posterior revision THA.ResultsThe average time to acetabular revision THA was 10 years (range, 0.04 to 44.1), with mechanical failure (36.7%) and metallosis (25.6%) being the most prevalent reasons for revision. No differences in age, body mass index, or sex were noted between groups. Anterior revision patients had a significantly shorter length of stay (2.2 versus 3.2 days, P = .003) and rate of discharge to a skilled nursing facility (7.5 versus 25.2%, P = .008). In the 90-day postoperative period, 9.2% of patients returned to the emergency department (n = 35) and twelve patients (3.2%) experienced a dislocation. There were 13.2% (n = 50) of patients having a rerevision during the follow-up period with a significant difference between anterior and posterior approaches (3.8 versus 14.7%, respectively, P = .049).ConclusionThis study provides some evidence that the anterior approach may be protective against skilled nursing facility discharge and rerevision and contributes to decreased lengths of stay. We recommend surgeons select the surgical approach for revision THA based on clinical preferences and patient factors.     

Standard Versus Custom-Made Acetabular Implants in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundToday, various options are used for the reconstruction of acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA). The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of using standard acetabular implants (SAIs) and custom-made acetabular implants (CMAIs) in RTHA in cases with extensive acetabular bone loss.MethodsThis was a comparative analysis of the results of 106 operations of RTHA performed during the period from January 2013 to December 2019. In 61 cases (57.5%), CMAIs were used. In 45 cases (42.5%), SAIs were implanted.ResultsThe incidence of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component after RTHA in uncontained loss of bone stock of the acetabulum (type III-IV as per the Gross and Saleh classification) using the CMAI was less than that using the SAI (2.4% and 10.0%, respectively). The most significant differences in aseptic loosening rates were noted after implantation of the CMAI and SAI in pelvic discontinuity with uncontained bone defect (0% and 60.0%, respectively; P < .001).ConclusionThe ideal indications for the use of the CMAI are uncontained defects and pelvic discontinuity with uncontained loss of bone stock (types III-V Gross and Saleh classification). Treatment of these defects with the SAI leads to a higher incidence of aseptic loosening requiring re-revisions. Further observation is required to assess the effectiveness of using the CMAI and SAI in the long-term follow-up period.     

Effect of Acetabular Reinforcement Ring With Hook for Acetabular Dysplasia Clarified by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

The objective of this study was to biomechanically determine the effect of the severity of acetabular dysplasia, number and positions of screws and type of bone graft material used on the initial fixation strength of the acetabular reinforcement ring with hook (Ganz ring) using the finite element method. Relative micromotion increased as the severity of acetabular dysplasia increased and tended to decrease as the number of screws increased, but varied according to screw placement position. Increased strength of the bone graft material led to decreased relative micromotion. Biomechanically, the Ganz ring can be placed securely using 3 screws in patients with Crowe 1 dysplasia. However, in patients with Crowe 2 or higher dysplasia, it is necessary to spread at least 4 screws across an area of good host bone.     

Accurate Acetabular Component Orientation After Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Acetabular Alignment Guide

Between February 2005 and August 2006, we recorded acetabular component orientation in 90 patients (100 hips) who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), to determine whether using an alignment guide ensures accurate acetabular positioning. In the alignment-guide group (46 patients; 48 hips), a guide was placed on the pelvis, a Kirschner wire (K-wire) was attached to the guide, and orientation of the acetabular component was confirmed by both the surgeon and an assistant. In the control group (44 patients; 52 hips), a K-wire was not used and the angle was confirmed by the surgeon alone. Radiographic acetabular component inclination and anteversion and computed tomography anteversion were determined. There was no significant difference in mean component orientation between the 2 groups. However, the SD was significantly smaller in the alignment-guide group, showing that consistent acetabular component orientation in primary THA is highly reproducible when an acetabular alignment guide with an attached K-wire is used.     

Multiple Revision Surgeries and Acetabular Bone Defect Size May Predict Daily Activity After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

We identified preoperative predictors and size of acetabular bone defects for poor return to daily activity after revision total hip arthroplasty.

Revision of Failed Total Hip Arthroplasty Acetabular Cups to Porous Tantalum Components : A 5-Year Follow-Up Study

We reviewed 263 consecutive patients with failed acetabular components after total hip arthroplasty that were revised using porous tantalum acetabular components and augments when necessary. The mean follow-up was 73.6 months (range, 60-84 months). The improvement of mean Harris hip score, Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index, and University of California Los Angeles activity scales were statistically significant (P < .001). Subjective assessments showed that 87.3% of patients reported “improvement” and 85.9% were “very or fairly pleased” with the results. At the most recent follow-up, all acetabular components were radiographically stable and none required rerevision for loosening. The acetabular revision was considered successful in 87% of cases. From this study, we conclude that the acetabular component used was reliable in creating a durable composite without failure for a minimum of 5 years.     

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Cementless Cup Supporter and Iliac Autograft: A Minimum of 15-Year Follow-Up

Background

Bone deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty is a surgical challenge. The Murata-Chiba cup supporter (MC support ring) is an acetabular component supporter for a cementless porous-coated cup. The purpose of this study is to examine the clinical and radiographic outcomes of reconstruction of acetabular bone deficiency using iliac autografts supported by an MC support ring in a revision setting with minimum 15-year follow-up.

A 2- to 16-Year Clinical Follow-Up of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a New Acetabular Implant Combined With Impacted Bone Allografts and a Cemented Cup

Background

Treatment of acetabular bone loss with impaction bone grafting (IBG) at revision total hip arthroplasty is highly dependent on mechanical stability and graft compression for clinical success. Here, we describe a new technique to further compress and stabilize the acetabular graft bed with a thin, perforated titanium shell.

Characterizing Femoral and Acetabular Bone Loss in Two-Stage Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Infection

BackgroundThe process of infection and multiple procedure-related factors in 2-stage exchange arthroplasty may lead to severe bone loss that can complicate subsequent reimplantation. The primary purpose of this study is to quantitatively characterize the extent of bone loss on the femoral and acetabular side prior to reimplantation during 2-stage revision hip arthroplasty for infection.MethodsThis retrospective case series includes 47 patients with planned 2-stage exchange arthroplasty for treatment of infected total hip replacement. Demographic, clinical, and surgical information, and complications during the 2-stage process were collected on all patients. The radiographs of all patients were reviewed prior to first-stage explantation and post-reimplantation or latest follow-up to characterize bone loss using the Paprosky classification systems.ResultsOf the 47 patients with planned 2-stage exchange, 10 patients (21%) were not reimplanted. Following explant and spacer placement, 32 patients (68%) experienced progressive femoral bone loss, and 20 (43%) experienced progressive acetabular bone loss. Patients who experienced progression of both femoral and acetabular bone (14, 30%) had a longer time between resection and reimplantation (164 ± 128 vs 88 ± 26 days, P = .03). A reimplantation time of greater than 90 days was associated with an increased risk of combined bone loss progression (15% vs 53%, P = .01). For patients who underwent reimplantation (79%), increased bone loss led to high rates of diaphyseal femoral fixation (97%) and revision acetabular components (38%).ConclusionIncreased time to reimplantation in 2-stage exchange arthroplasty for prosthetic hip infections is associated with a high rate of acetabular and femoral bone loss, and increased complexity of reimplantation.     

Reconstruction of Acetabular Defects With Impaction Grafting in Primary Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty Produces Favorable Results: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Over 6.4 Years on Average

BackgroundCemented primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) associated with acetabular reconstruction (AR) involving impacted bone grafting has been employed successfully in the revision of cavitary defects but the results are reportedly less predictable for segmental defects. The objective of the study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of patients who had presented cavitary, segmental, and combined acetabular defects and received THA/AR involving impacted morselized cancellous bone autografts followed by rigorous postoperative management.MethodsClinical outcomes were assessed retrospectively of 154 patients who had been submitted to 169 THA/AR procedures performed by a single surgeon over a 15-year period. The Harris Hip Score system was applied to 103 patients, and the degree of acetabular migration was determined from radiograph images of 91 AR procedures, of which 40 were segmental/combined and 51 were cavitary reconstructions.ResultsThe frequency of aseptic acetabular loosening was 3% while that of thromboembolic events was 4.1%. According to Harris Hip Score, 87.4% of outcomes were classified as excellent/good after an average follow-up period of 6.4 years irrespective of the type of acetabular defect. Horizontal and/or vertical acetabular migrations and changes in angular tilt were observed in all ARs, although the minor movements detected did not undermine the structural stability of the reconstructions or the functional capacity of patients.ConclusionThe described THA/AR technique can be used effectively in the reconstruction of segmental/combined and cavitary acetabular defects. The success of the technique as applied to segmental/combined defects was attributed in part to the rigorous rehabilitation protocol with temporary postoperative weight-bearing restriction.     

Midterm Outcomes After Reconstruction of Superolateral Acetabular Defects Using Flying Buttress Porous Tantalum Augments During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundPorous tantalum augments are versatile tools in reconstructing complex acetabular defects during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study examines the clinical and radiographic outcomes of porous tantalum augments placed in the type I (flying buttress) configuration at two to 17-year follow-up in the largest cohort to-date in the literature.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 59 consecutive revision THAs involving the use of flying buttress augments between 2003 and 2018. The mean patient age and follow-up duration were 63.9 ± 11.6 years (range, 35-87) and 8 years (range, 2-17), respectively. The Oxford hip score was used to assess clinical outcome. The modified Moore classification was used to assess acetabular augment and shell osseointegration. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess implant survivorship.ResultsThe mean Oxford hip score improved from 15.9 ± 6.2 preoperatively to 35.0 ± 6.5 at a mean follow-up of eight years (P < .0001). Radiographic assessment using the modified Moore classification demonstrated five signs of osseointegration in 49 hips (83.1%), four signs in six hips (10.2%), three signs in one hip (1.7%), and one sign in one hip (1.7%). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated ten-year survivorship of 88.9% (95% CI 74.4-95.4) with all-cause revision as end point and 94.3% (95% CI 83.1-98.2) with revision for acetabular aseptic loosening as end point.ConclusionTreatment of superolateral acetabular defects during revision THA using porous tantalum augments placed in the type I (flying buttress) configuration provides excellent implant survivorship and favorable clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up.Level of EvidenceTherapeutic Level IV.     

Trabecular Metal Augments for Severe Acetabular Defects in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Follow-Up

BackgroundPaprosky type IIIa and IIIb acetabular defects remain technically challenging during revision hip arthroplasty. Numerous surgical options exist to counter extensive acetabular bone loss with high postoperative complication and revision rates reported. Our aim was to report comprehensive long-term outcomes of our experience with Trabecular Metal (TM) augments for these difficult cases.Methods38 patients underwent revision total hip arthroplasty at our institution from 2009 to 2014 where a TM augment was used for acetabular deficiency. Prospective radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures were recorded and analyzed to a mean of 7.3 years (range: 5.4 to 10.8).ResultsNo patient was excluded or lost to follow-up. Complications included 3 intraoperative fractures, 1 early infection requiring washout with implant retention, 1 early revision due to allograft resorption, and 6 patients who required late repeat revision surgery: 3 for late infection, 2 for aseptic loosening with augment fracture or dislocation, and 1 for recurrent dislocation. The estimated mean implant survivorship was 8.99 years. 93.5% of augments remaining were well osseointegrated while 97% of the acetabular shells were osseointegrated. Hip center of rotation was restored by a mean of 14 mm inferiorly without significant medialization. Short Form-12 (SF-12) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were significantly reduced postoperatively to a level comparable to the average individual.ConclusionThis long-term study details our experience of TM augments for the most severe acetabular defects. For such cases, no excellent surgical solution exists; in comparison to alternative methods, we advocate that this technique is reasonably safe and effective.     

Acetabular Cup Revision With the Use of the Medial Protrusio Technique at an Average Follow-up of 6.6 Years

A significant rim defect encountered during revision surgery can make stable cementless cup fixation difficult. One approach to this problem is to medialize the acetabular cup to improve the degree of rim contact. In this study, we investigate this technique, termed the medial protrusio technique, for acetabular fixation in revision hip arthroplasty. A retrospective review of 25 patients (25 hips) who underwent medialization was performed. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed. At an average follow-up of 6.6 years, the overall patient function and satisfaction were good to excellent, with a mean Harris hip score of 85.2. This demonstrates that the medial protrusio technique can be a valuable option in addressing acetabular cup failure.     

Delayed Total Hip Arthroplasty for Failed Acetabular Fractures: The Influence of Initial Fracture Management on Outcome After Arthroplasty

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) provides a successful salvage option for failed acetabular fractures. The complexity of arthroplasty for a failed acetabular fracture will depend on the fracture pattern and the initial management of the fracture. Our objective was to compare the midterm outcome of THA between patients who presented with failed acetabular fractures following initial surgical or nonsurgical treatment.

Long-Term Results of Acetabular Reconstruction Using Ganz Acetabular Rings

Background

Our study examines the long-term results of acetabular reconstruction using the Ganz acetabular reinforcement ring (GRR) in total hip arthroplasty.

Management of Polyethylene Wear Associated With a Well-Fixed Modular Cementless Shell During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

We identified 128 revision total hip arthroplasties from 1993 to 2005 involving a well-fixed Harris-Galante Porous (HGP)-I or HGP-II acetabular component with minimum 2-year post-revision follow-up. Three treatment cohorts were identified. Of the hips that underwent modular liner exchange at revision, 14 hips (25%) required re-revision of the acetabular component, 8 for liner dislodgement, 3 for osteolysis and poly-wear, 2 for dislocation, and 1 for aseptic loosening. Of the hips that underwent revision of the well-fixed shell, 4 (15%) required subsequent re-revision of the acetabular component; 2 for dislocation and 2 for aseptic loosening. Six hips (27%) in the cemented liner group were re-revised; 4 for dislocation and 2 for loosening. Complete revision of a well-fixed HGP acetabular component is more reliable than liner exchange or liner cementation.