Early Outcomes of Kinematic Alignment in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature

Background

Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) seeks to more anatomically align the knee prosthesis to promote more physiological kinematics. However, there are questions about the durability, function, and complication rate of a non–mechanically aligned TKA. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate early outcomes after kinematic alignment.

Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Adjusted Restricted Kinematic Alignment for the Treatment of Severe Varus Deformity: Technical Note

ObjectiveTo describe a new alignment technique of adjusted restricted kinematic alignment (arKA) for the treatment of severe varus deformity in total knee arthroplasty.MethodsThree female patients (three severe varus knees) who underwent navigation‐assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using arKA from April 2020 to September 2020 were included in this study, with an average age of 71.33 years (range, 61 to 80 years). General anesthesia was given to all patients. Intraoperative observations including tibia resection angle, frontal femoral angle, axial femoral angle, medial and lateral gap in the extension and flexion positions and joint line translation were recorded. Also, operation duration and drainage volume were recorded. Radiographic parameters including the mechanical axis (α), coronal femoral component angle (β), coronal tibial component angle (γ), sagittal femoral component angle (δ), tibial posterior slope angle (ε), femoral‐patella angle (θ), and femoral notching were assessed. Clinical evaluation was performed using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Score. Both individual and mean measurement data were displayed.ResultsThe mean tibial resection was 4.00° varus (range, 3° to 5°), and the mean frontal femoral angle was 3.67° varus (range, 3° to 4°) in extension. The flexion lateral gap was wider than the medial gap with a mean laxity of 1.34 mm. Moreover, the mean axial femoral angle was 2.67° external (range, 0° to 6°) in flexion, and the mean joint line translation was 1.00 mm proximal (range, 0 to 3 mm). In addition, the mean preoperative mechanical axis was 156.22° (range, 153.65° to 158.90°) and the mean postoperative mechanical axis was 174.04° (range, 173.83° to 174.17°) with a mean correction of 17.82°. The mean femoral angle was 92.60° (range, 91.29° to 93.30°) and the mean tibial angle was 86.95° (range, 86.83° to 87.04°) in coronal plane. The HSS score improved from an average of 46.67 points (range, 42 to 51) preoperatively to 83.67 points (range, 81 to 86) at 3 months postoperatively. The mean WOMAC score was 16.33 points at 3 months postoperatively.ConclusionsThe new alignment technique of arKA aims to balance the flexion and extension gap without extensive releases of soft tissue and restore the native pre‐arthritic alignment, may be a promising alignment strategy for treating severe varus deformity. However, further study and comparison with other alignment techniques is needed.     

Staging Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasties Reduces Alignment Outliers

BackgroundPatients frequently present with bilateral symptomatic knee osteoarthritis and request simultaneous total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Technical differences between simultaneous and staged TKAs could affect clinical and radiographic outcomes. We hypothesized that staged TKAs would have fewer mechanical alignment outliers than simultaneous TKAs.MethodsWe reviewed 87 simultaneous and 72 staged TKAs with at least 2 years of follow-up. Radiographic assessment was done using standing long leg and lateral radiographs of the knee. Coronal and sagittal measurements were performed by 4 blinded observers on 2 separate occasions with an intraobserver agreement of 0.95 and interobserver of 0.92.ResultsThe first simultaneous knee had no difference in the probability of establishing the mechanical axis outside 3° of neutral (45%) compared to the first staged knee (54%, P = .337). However, the second simultaneous knee (49%) was more likely to establish the axis outside mechanical neutral compared to the second staged knee (28%; odds ratio 2.54, confidence interval 1.31-4.94, P = .006). There was an increased risk of deep venous thrombosis with staged TKA (odds ratio 2.96, confidence interval 1.28-6.84, P = .011), but other perioperative complication rates were not significantly different. There were no clinically significant differences in range of motion or Knee Society Score.ConclusionThere is a significantly increased risk of establishing the second knee outside mechanical neutral during a simultaneous TKA compared to staged bilateral TKAs, possibly related to a number of surgeon-related and system-related factors. The impact on clinical outcomes and radiographic loosening may become significant in long-term follow-up.     

Computer-Assisted Kinematic and Mechanical Axis Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Bilateral Simultaneous Surgery

BackgroundRandomized controlled trials of kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA) in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have to date demonstrated at least equivalence of KA in terms of clinical outcomes. No trial of bilateral TKA has been conducted so patient preference for one technique over the other is unknown.MethodsForty-one participants underwent computer-assisted bilateral TKA. The outcome measures were as follows: (1) joint range of motion and functional scores including the KOOS, the KOOS JR, Oxford Knee Score, and the Forgotten Joint Score at a minimum of 2 years; (2) preference and perception of limb symmetry; (3) intraoperative alignment data; (4) release and gap balance data; and (5) postoperative radiographic joint angles.ResultsThere were no significant differences with respect to flexion range (P = .970) or functional scores (mean KOOS, P = .941; KOOS JR, P = .685; Oxford Knee Score, P = .578; FJS, P = .542). Significantly more participants who favored one knee preferred their KA TKA (P = .03); however, half of the patients had no preference and the overall numbers were small. Only 3 participants perceived any limb asymmetry (P < .001). More releases were required in the MA group (P = .018). Standing hip-knee-ankle angle means and frequency distributions were similar (P = .097 and P = .097, respectively).ConclusionClinical outcomes were equivalent at 2 years. Significantly more participants preferred their KA joint. Fewer releases were required using a KA technique. Participants were visually insensitive to modest hip-knee-ankle angle asymmetry.Level of EvidenceLevel 1.     

Knee Kinematic and Clinical Outcomes Evolution Before, 3 Months,and 1 Year After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

The aim of this study was to describe the evolution of kinematic and clinical outcomes of a large patient cohort with knee osteoarthritis from before surgery (V1) to 3 months (V2) and 1 year (V3) after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Mid‐Term Outcomes of Navigation‐Assisted Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Adjusted Mechanical Alignment

ObjectiveThe adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA) technique is an extension of conventional mechanical alignment (MA), which has rarely been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate mid‐term outcomes of navigation‐assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using aMA.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study enrolled 63 consecutive patients (77 knees) who underwent navigation‐assisted TKA using aMA between September 2017 and October 2019. Fifty‐two consecutive patients (61 knees) who underwent TKA using MA during the same period were assessed as the controlled group. The demographic data and perioperative data were recorded. The parameters of resection and soft tissue balance including tibia resection angle, frontal femoral angle, axial femoral angle, joint line translation, medial and lateral gap in extension and flexion position were recorded. Radiographic parameters and functional scores including the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and Forgotten Joint Score‐12 (FJS‐12) were evaluated. Surgery‐related complications were recorded. The average follow‐up was 3.5 years, with a minimum of 2.4 years.ResultsThe frontal femoral angle was 2.55° ± 1.08° in aMA group versus 0.26° ± 0.60° in MA group (p < 0.001). The axial femoral angle was 3.07° ± 2.23° external in aMA group versus 2.30° ± 1.70° in MA group (p = 0.027). The lateral flexion gap was wider in the aMA group, with a mean of 0.71 mm more laxity (p = 0.001). Postoperative coronal alignment was 177.03° ± 1.82° in aMA group versus 178.14° ± 1.69° in MA group (p < 0.001). The coronal femoral component angle was 92.62° ± 2.78° in aMA group versus 90.85° ± 2.01° in MA group (p < 0.001). Both aMA‐TKA and MA‐TKA achieved satisfactory mid‐term clinical outcomes. However, the HSS scores at 1 month postoperatively were significantly higher using aMA than using MA (p < 0.001).ConclusionNavigation‐assisted TKA using aMA technique obtained satisfactory mid‐term clinical outcomes. The aMA technique aims to produce a biomimetic wider lateral flexion‐extension gap and minimize releases of soft tissues, which might be associated with better early clinical outcomes than MA technique.     

A Comparison of Classical and Anatomical Total Knee Alignment Methods in Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty : Classical and Anatomical Knee Alignment Methods in TKA

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes achieved using classical and anatomical alignment methods in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One hundred and seventeen patients were randomly assigned to undergo robotic-assisted TKA using either the classical (56 patients) or the anatomical alignment method (61 patients). Clinical outcomes including varus and valgus laxities, ROM, HSS and WOMAC scores and radiological outcomes were evaluated after a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Varus and valgus laxity assessments showed no significant inter-group differences (P > 0.05). Moreover, no significant differences were observed in ROM, HSS and WOMAC scores (P > 0.05). We could not find any significant difference in mechanical alignment of the lower limb. The results of this study show that two alignment methods provide comparable clinical and radiological outcomes after primary TKA.     

The Impact of Coronal Plane Alignment on Polyethylene Wear and Damage in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Study

Background

Coronal plane alignment is one of the contributing factors to polyethylene wear in total knee arthroplasty.

In Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty,Failure to Recreate Native Tibial Alignment Is Associated With Early Revision

BackgroundThe goal of kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is to restore native knee anatomy. However, there are concerns about patellofemoral tracking problems with this technique that lead to early revision. We measured the differences between preoperative anatomic alignment and postoperative component alignment in a consecutive series of KA TKA and evaluated the association between alignment changes and the likelihood of early revision.MethodsThe charts of 219 patients who underwent 275 KA TKA procedures were reviewed. Preoperative anatomic alignment and postoperative tibial and femoral component alignment were measured radiographically. The difference in component alignment compared with preoperative anatomic alignment was compared between patients who underwent aseptic revision and those who did not at a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Receiver operating characteristic curves were created for statistically significant variables, and the Youden index was used to determine optimal alignment thresholds with regard to likelihood of revision surgery.ResultsChange in tibial component alignment compared with native alignment was greater (P = .005) in the revision group (5.0° ± 3.7° of increased varus compared with preoperative anatomic tibial angle) than in the nonrevision group (1.3° ± 4.2° of increased varus). The Youden index indicated that increasing tibial varus by >2.2° or more is associated with increased likelihood of revision. Preoperative anatomic alignment and change in femoral alignment and overall joint alignment (ie, Q angle) were not associated with increased likelihood of revision.ConclusionSmall increases in tibial component varus compared with native alignment are associated with early aseptic revision in patients undergoing KA TKA.     

Tibial Component Alignment After Total Knee Arthroplasty with Intramedullary Instrumentation: A Prospective Analysis

The best operative technique for achieving appropriate postoperative alignment following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial, with proponents of extramedullary, intramedullary and computer-assisted techniques. One hundred ninety-two consecutive patients undergoing TKA were prospectively evaluated with full-length lower extremity radiographs. Patients underwent cemented TKA using femoral and tibial intramedullary instrumentation. Digital radiographs were analyzed using PACS (AGFA Healthcare, Ridgefield Park, NJ) software. Tibial component alignment was measured in the coronal and sagittal planes. Tibial component slope averaged 3.89° + 1.96 for the cruciate-retaining components and averaged 1.7° + 1.92 for PS components. The average coronal tibial component alignment was 90.00°, and 99% were within 3° of neutral mechanical alignment with only 2 (1%) outliers. Intramedullary instrumentation resulted in excellent postoperative tibial component and lower extremity alignment.     

No Correlation Between Clinical Outcomes and Changes in the Tibia-Metaphyseal Angle Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study

BackgroundDespite numerous advances in the implant design and surgical technique, improvement in patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has plateaued. Various TKA alignment strategies have been introduced that impact the coronal positioning of the tibial component relative to the native joint line. This study aims to analyze if postoperative variance of the joint line from preoperative native alignment is correlated with changes in patient-reported outcomes following primary TKA.MethodsA retrospective review of an academic center’s patient population identified all primary TKAs between 2013 and 2021 with full-length, standing radiographs and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) data. These measures included the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System, and Veterans RAND 12 scores. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements for hip-knee angle, tibia-metaphyseal angle, tibial-axis orientation angle, and joint-line obliquity angle were recorded. Three-month, 1-year, and 2-year PROM scores were correlated with the change in degrees for each of the angles using a Spearman’s correlation. A Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare angular changes with a change in PROM scores.ResultsOne hundred and ninety nine patients (204 knees) with a mean age of 67 years were included. Average follow-up was 23 months. Three-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up rates were 93%, 64%, and 34%, respectively. Improvements were seen across all PROMs regardless of an angular change.ConclusionThere were no clear correlations between PROMs and variation in joint line obliquity in the coronal plane. These data suggest that the magnitude of the variation in coronal tibial alignment from native alignment does not impact PROMs. Further study is indicated to correlate an angular change with functional measures.     

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Extra-Articular Deformity: Restoration of Mechanical Alignment Using Accelerometer-Based Navigation System

Background

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with post-traumatic extra-articular deformity (EAD) is difficult to manage using conventional instrumentation techniques. In this study, we evaluate whether accelerometer navigation system can be a valuable option to make accurate bone resections and restore the neutral mechanical axis in complex TKA patients with EAD.

Impact of Component Alignment and Soft Tissue Release on 2-Year Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to investigate the impact of alignment and soft tissue release on patient outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsIn a multicenter study, soft tissue releases during TKA were prospectively documented in 330 robotic-assisted TKAs. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were captured postoperatively. Delphi analysis was used to determine inlier and outlier component alignment boundaries: Tibia Coronal (TC): ±3°, Femur Coronal (FC): ±3°, Femoral Axial (FA): 3°Int-6°Ext, Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA): 3°Val-4°Var, and Tibiofemoral Axial (TFA): 3°Int-6°Ext. Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance tests were used to compare groups.ResultsNo significant differences were found between any individual or grouped inlier and outlier alignment criterion and KOOS at any timepoint. Outlier alignment frequencies were: TC: 0%, FC: 12%, FA: 8%, HKA: 9%, TFA: 8%, and Any: 23%. Soft tissue releases were performed in 18% of cases. Knees with soft tissue releases reported significantly worse KOOS scores at: 6M: Symptoms (80.0 versus 75.3, P = .03), activities of daily living (ADL) (86.2 versus 80.8, P = .030), quality of life (70.1 versus 60.9, P = .008), 12M ADL (90.0 versus 85.1, P = .023), and 24M ADL (91.9 versus 87.2, P = .016). A higher proportion of patients achieved Minimal Clinically Important Difference for pain at 6 months for those having no releases versus released (92.3% versus 81.0%, P = .021). No significant associations were found between preoperative deformity and preoperative or postoperative KOOS.ConclusionThe addition of soft tissue releases after bony cuts is associated with worse KOOS scores out to 2 years and was more prevalent in knees with worse deformity, while no such association was found for alignment.     

Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty Provides No Improvement in Component Alignment

Improved component alignment in TKA remains a commonly cited benefit of MRI based patient-specific instrumentation (PSI). We hypothesized that PSI would lead to improved alignment versus traditional instrumentation (TI) during primary TKA. Fifty-eight knees (54 patients) that underwent TKA with PSI were compared to 62 knees that had previously undergone TKA with TI. Radiographs were evaluated for mechanical axis and alignment of the femoral and tibial components. Alignment was similar between the groups. However, the PSI group showed fewer knees in the target range for posterior tibial slope (PSI 38% vs. TI 61%, P = 0.01) in addition to a trend for fewer knees in target range for femoral flexion (PSI 40% vs. TI 56%, P = 0.07). This study demonstrated no improvement in overall alignment and perhaps a worsening of the tibial slope.     

Plain Radiograph Fails to Reflect the Alignment and Advantages of Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

The study purposed to determine if a navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) leads to accurate limb alignment and component position than the conventional technique as measured by full length standing radiographs and to evaluate the correlation between navigation and radiographic measurements. A total of 160 knees underwent navigation (n = 80) or conventional (n = 80) TKAs. The frontal femoral alignment was more accurate in navigation TKAs, whereas mechanical axis and frontal tibial alignment were similar in both techniques. Although the intraoperative navigation alignment showed no outliers, postoperative radiographic measure resulted as much as 20% of outliers, and there was no correlation between the two measurements. This lack of correlation and inherent limitations in measuring TKA alignment may bring to question if plain radiograph are useful to determine if alignment achieved by navigation is accurate.     

全膝关节置换术治疗膝外翻畸形疗效观察

目的探讨膝外翻畸形患者施行全膝关节置换的手术方法和临床疗效。方法 2001年7月至2008年6月收治膝外翻畸形患者25例29膝,男5例,女20例;年龄55-75岁,平均64.3岁。手术采用髌旁内侧入路,模具引导下截骨,按Whiteside方法进行外侧软组织松解,采用后方稳定型假体。对比手术前、后股胫角变化,采用KSS评分评价手术疗效。结果 1例患者住院期间发生深静脉血栓,经溶栓治疗后症状消失。全部患者获12-48个月随访,无感染、腓总神经损伤、髌骨脱位、膝关节不稳等并发症。术后12个月平均股胫角（7.42±1.80）°,KSS临床评分（82.47±5.38）分,功能评分（86.47±4.83）分,与术前比较有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论膝外翻畸形施行全膝关节置换手术,术中正确截骨,合理软组织松解,保持髌骨良好运行轨迹,防止腓总神经损伤,可以获得满意疗效。     

Current Role of Computer Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Computer-assisted surgical (CAS) navigation has been developed with the aim of improving the accuracy and precision of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) component positioning and therefore overall limb alignment. The historical goal of knee arthroplasty has been to restore the mechanical alignment of the lower limb by aligning the femoral and tibial components perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the femur and tibia. Despite over 4 decades of TKA component development and nearly 2 decades of interest in CAS, the fundamental question remains; does the alignment goal and/or the method of achieving that goal affect the outcome of the TKA in terms of patient-reported outcome measures and/or overall survivorship? The quest for reliable and reproducible achievement of the intraoperative alignment goal has been the primary motivator for the introduction, development, and refinement of CAS navigation. Numerous proprietary systems now exist, and rapid technological advancements in computer processing power are stimulating further development of robotic surgical systems. Three categories of CAS can be defined: image-based large-console navigation; imageless large-console navigation, and more recently, accelerometer-based handheld navigation systems have been developed.