首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (RP) in men with pathologically organ-confined (OC) prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: Clinical and pathological characteristics of 331 consecutive men with pT2N0 PCa treated solely with RP were used in Cox proportional hazard models to identify independent predictors of prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure (PSA > or = 0.1 ng/ml). All pathologic specimens were step sectioned at 3 mm. RESULTS: Twelve patients (3.6%) failed at a median follow-up of 26 months (range 0.2-99.6 months) and 120 men remained at risk 3 years after RP. In univariate Cox models PSA (P < 0.001), percentage of high-grade cancer (P < 0.001) total and high-grade cancer volume (P = 0.001 and P < 0.0001, respectively) and RP Gleason sum (P = 0.003) represented significant predictors of PSA failure. Clinical stage (P = 0.4), surgical margin status (P = 0.3), age (P = 0.2), and pathologic evidence of unilateral versus bilateral PCa (P = 0.6) failed to reveal significance. In receiver operator curve (ROC) analyses, high-grade cancer volume achieved highest outcome predictive accuracy (area under the curve (AUC 0.93)), which was not exceeded by Cox regression-based nomogram combining serum PSA, RP Gleason sum, margin status and pathologic evidence of unilateral versus bilateral PCa (AUC 091). Predictive accuracy of this multivariate nomogram was not enhanced by adding total cancer volume (AUC 0.93), high-grade cancer volume (AUC 0.90), or percentage of high-grade cancer (AUC 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: In pT2N0 PCa high-grade cancer volume appears to represent the most important pathologic factor for prediction of outcome following RP. However, similar predictive accuracy may be achieved by combining routinely available tumor characteristics.  相似文献   

2.
PURPOSE: To perform a multivariate analysis to investigate the usefulness of eight preoperative variables as predictors of final pathological stage (pT), positive surgical margins (PSM) and biological progression after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 143 patients undergoing RP for T1-T2 prostate cancer, the respective values of age, clinical stage, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), number of positive biopsies (NPB), Gleason score, length of tissue core invaded by cancer (LTI) and topography (uni/bilaterality) of positive biopsies for predicting extracapsular extension, PSM and biochemical failure (PSA> or =0.05 ng/ml) were evaluated retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to define the statistical significance of each variable. Actuarial survival without biological progression was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method (log-rank test). RESULTS: In this series, 44.8% of patients had extracapsular extension with 41.3% PSM. The mean PSA was 12.4 ng/ml. In univariate analysis, LTI (p<0.0001), NPB (p = 0.0023), PSA (p = 0.0039) and Gleason score (p = 0.0136) were the most powerful variables to predict pT stage; however, in logistic regression analysis, LTI was the most predictive feature. For prediction of PSM, some variables (LTI, NPB and PSA) were found to be of statistical value in univariate analysis, and LTI in combination with NPB and PSA in multivariate analysis. For biological progression, statistical analysis (log rank test) showed PSAD and LTI to be significant predictors. CONCLUSION: The pathological report regarding the biopsy contains crucial information influencing the prediction of pT stage, PSM and biological progression after RP. LTI, NPB and PSA are the most useful parameters for this purpose.  相似文献   

3.
PURPOSE: Bladder neck preservation during radical prostatectomy has been correlated with improved continence. However, the hazard of a positive margin at this specific site has discouraged many urologists. We evaluated if preservation of the bladder neck at the time of radical prostatectomy jeopardizes surgical cancer control with consequent deleterious outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 675 consecutive patients underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) by a single surgeon (J.E.P.) at Wayne State University during the 1990s decade. The bladder neck was preserved. Margin-positivity was categorized by location and number. Preoperative, pathological and disease status data was prospectively collected into the Karmanos Cancer Institute multidisciplinary prostate cancer database. RESULTS: Analysis was performed on 555 patients who had RP as monotherapy. Positive margins were found in 178 (32%) of these patients. Correlation between specimen Gleason score, prostatic specific antigen (PSA) and margin status, was encountered (p=0.001). Apical and bladder neck margin-positivity was detected in 104/555 (19%) and 13/555 (2%), respectively. Of those specimens with a positive margin at the bladder neck eight had Gleason score > or =7, three had seminal vesicle invasion and two nodal disease. Only two patients had a positive bladder neck margin as the sole adverse pathological feature. Significant independent predictors of survival included the Gleason score, PSA, pathological stage and presence of positive margins in more than one location. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical preservation of the bladder neck does not increase the percentage of positive margins at this anatomical location and does not compromise disease-free survival.  相似文献   

4.
OBJECTIVE: A positive surgical margin (PSM) is considered an adverse prognostic indicator in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). However, there are discrepancies among studies concerning the effect of PSM on prognosis. In addition, the significance of PSM location and extent is uncertain. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of surgical margin status on serum prostate-specific antigen (sPSA) relapse in men consecutively receiving RP in a non-screened population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 219 prostatectomy specimens were examined microscopically. The mean follow-up time was 62 months (range 6-121 months). Tumour grade (Gleason score), pathological tumour stage and tumour involvement of the surgical margins were recorded. The 71 specimens with one or more PSM were re-examined with regard to location, number of locations and total linear extent of PSM. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazards regression were used in the univariate analyses. Multivariate analyses controlling for the known preoperative sPSA, pathological stage and Gleason score were also performed, using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: In the univariate analyses, PSM without regard to location, PSM at the anterior prostate or at the apex, PSM at three or more locations and linear extent of PSM > or =6mm were associated with a statistically significant higher hazard ratio of PSA relapse. However, none of these variables remained statistically significant when controlling for the known risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: In this non-screened prostate cancer population PSM status (linear extent, location and number of locations) had an impact on postoperative sPSA recurrence. In multivariate analyses PSM showed a strong trend (p approximately 0.06) towards having an independent statistically significant negative influence on the risk of PSA relapse following RP.  相似文献   

5.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship of preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and PSA density with several clinical and pathological variables, including biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP), and to compare the preoperative PSA level and PSA density as prognostic factors in prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 348 patients who had a RP at one institution, with whole-mount specimens of the prostate examined by one pathologist. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the relationship of the preoperative PSA level and PSA density with clinical and pathological variables, and by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to evaluate the relative usefulness of the two factors as predictors for biochemical recurrence. RESULTS: The PSA level before RP was significantly correlated (Spearman's rank correlation) with patient age (P = 0.003), prostate weight (P < 0.001), cancer volume (P < 0.001) and Gleason score (P = 0.033), and with surgical margin status and pathological stage (both P < 0.001) in the RP specimen. In the multivariate analysis controlling for tumour stage, surgical margin status, and Gleason score, both PSA level and PSA density were significant predictors of PSA recurrence (P = 0.027 and 0.01, respectively). ROC analysis showed no statistical difference between the PSA level and PSA density in predicting PSA recurrence after RP (P = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: These results show a significant correlation of the preoperative PSA level with other established prognostic factors for prostate cancer. In the multivariate analysis, both PSA level and PSA density were independent predictors of PSA recurrence. Because the PSA level is as effective as PSA density in predicting PSA recurrence, the extra effort required to calculate PSA density may not be warranted. We recommend that the PSA level before RP be considered in stratifying patients into different prognostic groups, and in determining the optimum management.  相似文献   

6.
PURPOSE: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a highly effective treatment for patients with prostate cancer. However, patients with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy have less than ideal outcomes with 5-year progression rates between 36% and 50%. Postoperative radiation therapy (RT) is often advocated for improving these outcomes. We identified predictors of response to adjuvant RT given for positive margins after RP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of men who underwent RP between 1987 and 1999 at our institution and who received adjuvant RT for positive surgical margins. Only patients in whom prostate specific antigen (PSA) was undetectable after RP as well as before the initiation of RT were included. Numerous clinicopathological variables, including pre-RP PSA, pathological stage, margin length and location, and extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle involvement, were assessed for their adverse effect on the biochemical recurrence rate after adjuvant RT. RESULTS: A total of 62 men met our inclusion criteria. Median age at surgery was 60.7 +/- 6.1 years and median PSA at presentation was 9.0 ng/ml (range 1.4 to 64.9). The median RT dose was 60.0 +/- 3.6 Gy. RT was started a median of 5.0 +/- 3.6 months after RP. The 5 and 10-year biochemical disease-free survival rates for the whole group were 90.2% and 87.9%, respectively. Of all parameters tested only Gleason score 4 + 3 or greater (p = 0.037) and pre-RP PSA greater than 10.9 ng/ml (p = 0.040) were predictive of biochemical recurrence after adjuvant RT on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis only pre-RP PSA greater than 10.9 ng/ml remained an independent predictor (p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of true adjuvant RT in patients with positive margins after RP and undetectable PSA those with predominant Gleason grade 4 or greater, or PSA greater than 10.9 ng/ml at presentation are at increased risk for recurrence after adjuvant RT.  相似文献   

7.
BACKGROUND: The routine use of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing combined with digital rectal examination has lowered tumor volume and clinical-pathological stage of men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Therefore, we may identify more men with poorly differentiated tumors of early clinical stage. In order to identify those who may benefit from radical prostatectomy, we evaluated known prognostic variables in patients with prostate cancer of high Gleason score (8-10). METHODS: Of 652 patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy as monotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer between March 1991-December 1995, 84 patients with prostatectomy specimen Gleason score 8-10 tumors were identified. Clinical-pathological data were obtained from our prostate cancer database. Gleason score, PSA level, margin status, pathologic stage, and tumor volume were analyzed as general prognostic variables for disease-free survival (DFS). Follow-up ranged from 13-84 months (median, 36.2). Biochemical recurrence was defined as a postoperative PSA elevation greater than 0.4 ng/ml. RESULTS: The DFS for patients with Gleason score 8-10 and pathologically organ-confined disease was 62.5%. DFS was 56.2% for patients with PSA < or =10 ng/ml, compared to 19.2% for patients with serum PSA >10 ng/ml (P = 0.009). Patients with nonspecimen-confined disease (positive margins) had a DFS rate of 26.6% vs. 55% for patients with specimen-confined disease (negative margins) (P = 0.009). On multivariable analysis, only preoperative PSA < or =10 ng/ml (P = 0.02) and surgical margin status (P = 0.04) were significant predictors of DFS. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical margin status and preoperative serum PSA level are independent predictors of DFS for patients with high Gleason score prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy as monotherapy. Patients with poorly differentiated prostate cancer treated surgically at an early stage can have a favorable prognosis, especially if negative surgical margins are obtained. A preoperative serum PSA level < or =10 ng/ml carries the greatest likelihood of achieving prolonged DFS in this group of patients.  相似文献   

8.
OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether preoperative parameters predict pathological stage at radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localized prostatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied a total of 160 men with clinically localized prostatic cancer (less than or equal to clinical T2) who underwent radical rertropubic prostatectomy at Wakayama Medical University. Clinical Ts patients are not included in this study. Preoperative parameters include patient age, Body Mass Index, preoperative serum PSA value, biopsy Gleason score, clinical stage, the percent of positive biopsy cores (%PosBx) and the percent of positive biopsy cores on the dominant side (%DomPosBx). Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to examine the prognostic significance of these preoperative parameters. Significant independent factors were combined to create a table to predict pathologically organ confined disease. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed preoperative serum PSA value (p< 0.001), biopsy Gleason score (p =0.001), clinical stage (p = 0.026), %PosBx (p= 0.002) and %DomPosBx (p=0.003) were significantly related to the pathological stage. On multivariate analysis, serum PSA value (p< 0.01), biopsy Gleason score (p<0.05) and %DomPosBx (p<0.05) were significant independent predictors of pathological stage. CONCLUSION: We provide two model combinations using preoperative clinical factors, one is a combination of serum PSA and biopsy Gleason score and the other is a combination of serum PSA and %DomPosBx, which define a new preoperative model for predicting pathological organ confined prostatic cancer. These combinations are useful and provide important information for urologists to determine the appropriate treatment strategy for clinically localized prostatic cancer.  相似文献   

9.
PURPOSE: Previous studies have suggested that prostate specific antigen (PSA) density is a significant independent predictor of biochemical failure after primary therapy. We determined whether pathological PSA density using surgical weight of the radical prostatectomy specimen was an independent predictor of adverse pathological features or biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. We also examined whether combining pathological PSA density with biopsy Gleason score improved risk stratification compared with serum PSA and biopsy Gleason score for predicting PSA recurrence after prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multivariate analysis was used to determine whether pathological PSA density was an independent predictor of adverse pathology or PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy in 325 patients treated at a Veterans Affairs medical center. Cutoff points of pathological PSA density were generated to identify patients at various risks for biochemical recurrence. These cutoffs were combined with biopsy Gleason cutoff points 2 to 6, 7 and 8 to 10 to generate a risk stratification system that was compared with a previous risk stratification system using PSA and biopsy Gleason score cutoff points. The validity of the risk stratification system using pathological PSA density and biopsy Gleason score was evaluated in another cohort of 490 patients treated with radical prostatectomy at a tertiary care medical center. RESULTS: Pathological PSA density was an independent predictor of positive surgical margins (p <0.001), nonorgan confined disease (p <0.001), seminal vesicle invasion (p = 0.003) and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (p <0.001). The cutoff points for pathological PSA density of less than 0.3, 0.3 to 0.7 and greater than 0.7 ng./ml./gm. separated patients into 3 distinct groups at increasing risk for biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (p <0.001). Pathological PSA density cutoffs combined with biopsy Gleason score cutoffs 2 to 6, 7 and 8 to 10 provided better risk stratification for biochemical failure than cutoffs based on a combination of PSA and biopsy Gleason score in patients treated at the Veterans Affairs (hazards ratio 3.04, confidence interval 2.25 to 4.11, p <0.001) and tertiary care (hazards ratio 2.38, confidence interval 1.78 to 3.18, p <0.001) medical centers. CONCLUSIONS: Pathological PSA density was a strong predictor of advanced pathology and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. Pathological PSA density combined with biopsy Gleason score defined a novel risk group system that improved risk stratification compared with a combination of PSA and biopsy Gleason score. These results were validated in another cohort of patients treated with radical prostatectomy at a tertiary care medical center. Further studies are required using PSA density values calculated from preoperative transrectal ultrasound measurements to determine whether a combination of PSA density and biopsy Gleason score provides significant pretreatment risk stratification.  相似文献   

10.
OBJECTIVE: Radical prostatectomy remains the standard treatment for early prostate cancer. Few data in the literature are from South East Asia. This study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of radical prostatectomy in Thai men. METHODS: A total of 151 patients with prostate cancer underwent radical prostatectomy at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, between 1994 and 2003. Clinical staging, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score were evaluated with pathological stage and margin status. Follow-up PSA monitoring and survival were analysed. RESULTS: Of 121 patients with clinical localized disease, 79 (65.3%), 40 (33.1%) and two (1.6%) had localized, locally advanced and metastatic disease, respectively, on pathology. The chance of localized disease with a preoperative PSA of 10 ng/mL or less, more than 10-50 ng/mL and more than 50 ng/mL was 75.5%, 50% and 12.5%, respectively (all p < 0.001). The chance of localized disease with a Gleason score of 2-4, 5-7 and 8-10 was 85%, 55.1% and 20.8%, respectively (all p < 0.02). Mean follow-up was 30 months. Among 140 evaluable patients, 51 (36.4%) had adjuvant therapy and 136 (97.1%) had undetectable PSA without clinical progression. The cumulative PSA progression-free survival among patients with pathological T1N0, T2N0 and T3N0 disease was 0.83 at 82 months, 0.48 at 85 months and 0.31 at 57 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Radical prostatectomy in Thai men shows excellent results. The trend is the same as in Western series. The chance of organ-confined disease and free margin was high in patients with clinical T2 or less, PSA less than 10 ng/mL and low Gleason score. PSA progression-free survival was high in patients with organ-confined disease.  相似文献   

11.
Study Type – Therapy (case series)
Level of Evidence 4

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors of a positive surgical margin (PSM) and the significance of a PSM after radical prostatectomy (RP) on biochemical recurrence (BCR) in exclusively pathologically confirmed organ‐confined (OC) prostate cancer, as despite an excellent prognosis after RP, some patients with pathologically confirmed OC disease have BCR, and the prognostic significance of a PSM in these men remains unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We assessed 932 men with pathologically OC disease who were treated with RP by nine different surgeons between 1992 and 2004. The prognostic significance of clinical and pathological variables, including tumour volume (TV) and percentage of high‐grade TV (%HGTV) were assessed. Logistic and Cox regression models were fitted to identify risk factors of a PSM and BCR. BCR was defined as a prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level of 0.1 ng/mL and increasing after an undetectable PSA level.

RESULTS

The total PSM rate was 12.9% (120 men); the mean TV (P < 0.001), but not %HGTV (P= 0.2) was significantly higher in patients with PSM. TV, nerve‐sparing RP technique and surgical volume were independent risk factors for a PSM (P= 0.03). After a median follow‐up of 35 months the overall BCR rate was 8.8% (82 men). Patients with a PSM had significantly higher BCR rates (21.7% vs 6.9%; P < 0.001). In univariable analysis, a high %HGTV (70.4%) was the most informative risk factor of BCR, followed by RP Gleason score (65.8%) and PSM (65.7%). Removal of PSM from a multivariable Cox model decreased the accuracy by 12.1% (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that in OC prostate cancer, the risk of a PSM depends on TV, surgical technique and surgical volume. PSM is a significant risk factor for BCR. However, only 20% men with OC disease and a PSM develop BCR; conversely, 80% of men are cured despite a PSM. Therefore, adjuvant therapy must be considered, with caution to avoid unnecessary overtreatment.  相似文献   

12.
13.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the preoperative features and pathological outcomes of clinical significance of 1001 consecutive essentially unscreened men who had a radical prostatectomy (RP) in the UK between 1988 and 2002, and their changes over time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The details of men whose RP specimen was submitted for analysis were entered into the RP database held at the University College Hospital, London; the National Health Service and private patients of 17 surgeons were included. The age, mode of diagnosis, preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, biopsy and RP findings were compared over time. RESULTS: The mean (range) age of the men was 62 (40-76) years, the median PSA 8 (0.1-146) ng/mL and the median biopsy Gleason sum score 6; these preoperative features did not change over the study period. The diagnosis of prostate cancer was made by transurethral resection of the prostate alone in 48 men (5%). The maximum number of patients receiving neoadjuvant androgen ablation was 21 (33%) in 1996, and subsequently declined. The median (range) RP Gleason sum score was 7 (4-9). The biopsy Gleason score correlated with the prostatectomy Gleason score in 252 (47%) of 536 men, being lower in 170 (32%) and higher in 113 (21%). The median tumour volume was 2 mL (focus of invasive acini - 31 mL) and the incidence of positive intra- and extraprostatic margins was 52%. Both tumour volume and extraprostatic margin positivity declined with time. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative features and pathological findings from this UK series are similar to those of other reported cohorts from unscreened populations. The incidence of positive extraprostatic surgical margins, tumour volume and stage decreased with time.  相似文献   

14.
目的探讨经腹膜外途径腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性的影响因素。方法回顾性分析我院2010年1月至2018年12月99例行腹膜外途径腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术患者的临床资料。年龄51~79岁,平均(65.37±6.07)岁;前列腺特异抗原(PSA)2.80~79.50ng/mL,平均(16.84±12.28)ng/mL。分析术后病理切缘阳性的特征。按年龄、体质指数、术前PSA水平、穿刺针数阳性百分率、穿刺至手术时间、穿刺病理Gleason评分、临床T分期、前列腺癌危险分度、术后病理Gleason评分、术后T分期、腹盆腔手术史等进行分组,分析各组切缘阳性率的差异。采用χ^2检验进行单因素分析,有统计学差异的变量进入多因素Logistic回归分析,评价临床及病理相关资料与切缘阳性的关系。结果本组99例患者均在腹腔镜下顺利完成,无1例中转开放,手术时间平均(199.66±66.01)min,术中出血量平均(152.02±140.28)mL。术后病理证实均为前列腺癌,术后病理切缘阳性26例(26.3%)。将各危险因素分组后进行单因素分析,结果显示不同穿刺针数阳性百分率(P=0.047)、穿刺病理Gleason评分(P=0.023)、术后病理Gleason评分(P=0.007)、术后T分期(P=0.004)与切缘阳性存在相关性(P<0.05),而年龄(P=0.134)、体质指数(P=0.838)、术前PSA水平(P=0.299)、穿刺至手术时间(P=1.000)、临床T分期(P=0.821)、前列腺癌危险分度(P=0.903)、腹盆腔手术史(P=0.607)与切缘阳性均无相关性(P>0.05)。将单因素分析差异有统计学意义的指标及术前PSA、临床分期进行多因素分析,结果显示仅术后T分期(P=0.011)是切缘阳性的独立危险因素。结论穿刺针数阳性百分率、穿刺病理Gleason评分、术后病理Gleason评分、术后T分期与切缘阳性存在相关性,其中穿刺针数阳性百分率、穿刺病理Gleason评分及术后T分期越高,切缘阳性率越高。术后T分期是经腹膜外途径腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性的独立危险因素。  相似文献   

15.
PURPOSE: Grading prostate cancer using the Gleason system relies only on architectural tumor growth, in contrast to other systems, such as the WHO system, which grade prostate carcinoma based on nuclear features as well as architectural patterns. The prognostic significance of nuclear grading remains controversial since most studies were performed before prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening became widely available. We evaluated the significance of nuclear grade for predicting PSA recurrence in a contemporary cohort of patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nuclear grades 1 to 3 were determined in 141 consecutive radical prostatectomies in 1995. Predominant and worst nuclear grade was determined by a consensus of 3 pathologists. Statistical analysis compared nuclear grade with Gleason score using the chi-square test. The Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to calculate the ability of nuclear grade, Gleason score and other variables to predict PSA recurrence. RESULTS: We identified a significant association of Gleason score with worst nuclear grade (p = 0.007). All 6 cases with a Gleason score of 8 or greater had a worst nuclear grade of 3, in contrast to 36 of 60 (60%) with a score 6 or less, in which the worst nuclear grade was 3. Of the 141 patients 31 (21.9%) had PSA recurrence at a median followup of 3.7 years. The univariate Cox model revealed significant associations of PSA recurrence with Gleason score 8 or greater (hazards ratio 5.5, p = 0.005), extraprostatic extension (hazards ratio 3.4, p = 0.001), positive surgical margin (hazards ratio 2.6, p = 0.009), seminal vesicle involvement (hazards ratio 7.3, p <0.001), preoperative serum PSA (hazards ratio 1.03, p = 0.007), tumor stage (hazards ratio 3.6, p = 0.001) and maximal tumor dimension (hazards ratio 2.4, p <0.001). However, overall and worst nuclear grade did not predict PSA recurrence (p = 0.89 and 0.13, respectively). Nuclear grade did not fit any multivariate model tested, which otherwise included Gleason score, log(PSA), surgical margin status, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle status, tumor size and pathological stage. By varying sample fixation time we also showed that benign prostate tissue in the same section as prostate carcinoma had grade 2 or 3 nuclear changes, that is moderate to marked anaplasia. CONCLUSIONS: High nuclear grade is associated with high Gleason score. However, prostate carcinoma with a Gleason score of 6 or less shows extreme variability. Nuclear grade determined by light microscopy failed to predict PSA recurrence in a contemporary series of men with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. Nuclear morphology is subject to tissue fixation and processing artifact. Any nuclear morphometric study must consider this artifact.  相似文献   

16.
PURPOSE: Pretreatment clinical staging of prostatic adenocarcinoma is important due to the increasing use of nonsurgical treatment options. Using multivariate analysis we assessed the predictive value of biopsy cores positive for cancer as a percent of all cores obtained as well as the percent surface area of needle cores involved with tumor for determining tumor volume and pathological stage at radical prostatectomy. Candidate variables for the multivariate model included patient age, clinical disease stage, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score of cancer in the needle biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed prostate needle biopsy findings in 207 consecutive patients who subsequently underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy. Each biopsy specimen was assessed for tumor involvement by calculating the percent of cores positive for cancer, percent surface area involved in all cores and Gleason score. Initial serum PSA and preoperative clinical disease stage were incorporated with biopsy results into a multivariate model to determine the parameters most predictive of pathological stage and tumor volume at radical retropubic prostatectomy. RESULTS: Of the 207 patients 152 (73.4%) had organ confined cancer and 55 (26.6%) had extraprostatic extension (pathological stages T2 and T3 or greater, respectively). Preoperative clinical staging information was available in 195 cases, in which disease was clinically confined and not confined in 184 (94.4%) and 11 (5.6%), respectively. Needle biopsy revealed a surface area of cancer ranging from less than 5% in 69 patients (33.3%) to 90% (mean 16, median 10). Univariate analysis demonstrated that the risk of extraprostatic extension was predicted by preoperative serum PSA (p = 0.027), the percent of cores and percent of surface area positive for cancer (p <0.0001), and Gleason score (p = 0.0009). Clinical stage approached significance (p = 0.071). Multivariate analysis showed that the percent of positive cores (p = 0.0003), initial serum PSA (p = 0.005) and Gleason score of cancer in the needle biopsy (p = 0.03) were the only parameters that jointly predicted pathological stage (T2 versus T3). Percent of tumor surface area involvement in the needle biopsies did not add any more information after the percent of positive cores was known. Univariate analysis revealed that the percent of cores positive for cancer (Spearman r = 0.52, p <0.0001), Gleason score (Spearman r = 0.34, p <0.0001) and initial serum PSA (Spearman r = 0.24, p = 0.003) were predictive of log tumor volume at radical prostatectomy, while clinical stage was not (rank sum test p = 0.14). On multivariate analysis the percent of positive cores (p <0.0001), Gleason score (p <0.0001) and initial serum PSA (0.0033) were the only variables that jointly were predictive of tumor volume. CONCLUSIONS: The percent of needle biopsy cores and surface area positive for cancer are the strongest predictors of pathological stage and tumor volume on multivariate analysis incorporating preoperative serum PSA and Gleason score.  相似文献   

17.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the hypothesis that Northern Africans differ from Caucasians with regard to their PCa characteristics, using our 1988-2006 database we retrospectively reviewed the preoperative and pathological features of consecutive patients subjected to radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) and stratified according to their ethnic origin. METHODS: In 727 consecutive patients (616 Caucasians; 61 Blacks originating from Central Africa and the French West Indies; 50 Northern Africans from Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia), we preoperatively analyzed and compared age, clinical stage of the tumour, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), transrectal ultrasound prostate volume, PSA density (PSAD), biopsy Gleason score, number of positive cores (NPC), and percentage of tissue core invaded by cancer (PTIC); postoperatively, we determined the status of the capsule, seminal vesicles, and margins of the RP specimen, as well as Gleason score and prostate weight. Statistical analyses (chi-square test and ANOVA) were performed to compare the results between the three groups of patients. A multivariate analysis was carried out to test the independence of variables. RESULTS: Black patients were the youngest at the time of surgery (by 3-4 yr) and had the highest rates of final Gleason score>or=8. The Northern Africans had more favourable features than did Caucasian and Black patients: mean PTIC was 7.1% versus 14.6% and 12.5%, respectively (p=0.005), mean NPC was 26.4% versus 34.7% and 36.4%, respectively (p=0.034), rates of biopsy and final Gleason score>or=8 were significantly lower (p=0.02 and p=0.028, respectively), and there were positive margins in 26% versus 36% and 35.6%, respectively (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that a French Black population is the most likely of those studied to have unfavourable PCa characteristics at the time of RP. Albeit in a limited series, we show for the first time that Northern Africans have significantly better features in this regard than Caucasians and Blacks. Although Northern Africans did not have a better pathological stage outcome, they did have a more favourable Gleason score.  相似文献   

18.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of cancer control afforded by radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with clinical stage T3 prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data for patients treated by RP for clinical stage T3 prostate cancer between 1995 and 2005. The following case characteristics were analysed: patient age, clinical presentation, preoperative prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, tumour stage (2002 Tumour‐Node‐Metastasis), surgical procedure, pathological data, margin and lymph node status, and recurrence. Biochemical recurrence was defined as an increase in PSA level of >0.2 ng/mL after surgery. Kaplan‐Meier survival curves were generated, and prognostic factors were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 100 patients were included; only 79% of them had pT3 disease based on the pathological specimen. The median follow‐up after RP was 69 months. The RP was open in 77 and laparoscopic in 23, with no significant difference between these approaches (P = 0.38). The 5‐year PSA‐free survival after surgery was 45%, and 5‐year cancer‐specific survival was 90%. On univariable analysis, Gleason score >7 (P = 0.01), pathological stage (pT2‐T3a vs T3b) (P < 0.001), positive lymph node (P < 0.001), and positive margin (P < 0.001) were associated with recurrence. On multivariable analysis, lymph node, margin status and Gleason score were also significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

RP can be recommended as an alternative primary treatment that results in acceptable cancer control for clinical stage T3 prostate cancer in selected cases. However, the patient should be warned that surgery alone might not be sufficient to control the cancer, and that adjuvant therapy might be needed during the course of the disease.  相似文献   

19.

Background

Bone metastases are the most critical complication of prostate cancer (PCa), resulting in severe morbidity and mortality. Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 11b (TNFRSF11B) is a critical regulator between PCa cells and the bone environment. Recently, TNFRSF11B rs10505346 has been implicated in PCa risk in the Cancer Genetic Markers of Susceptibility genomewide association study. However, the association between this variant and biochemical failure in PCa patients receiving radical prostatectomy (RP) has not been determined.

Methods

Associations of TNFRSF11B rs10505346 with age at diagnosis, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, pathologic stage, surgical margin, and PSA recurrence were evaluated in a cohort of 314 localized PCa patients receiving RP. The prognostic significance on PSA recurrence was assessed by Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox regression model.

Results

The mean level of preoperative PSA and the relative risks of PSA recurrence after RP were lower in individuals with T allele than in those with the G allele at TNFRSF11B rs10505346 (P = 0.019 and 0.014, respectively). The T allele of rs10505346 remained a protective factor against PSA recurrence (P = 0.022) in multivariate Cox regression model after considering all clinicopathological risk factors except PSA level.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that TNFRSF11B rs10505346 is associated with PSA level and might be a prognostic factor for the recurrence of PSA in PCa patients receiving RP.  相似文献   

20.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcome of radical prostatectomy (RP) in Japan, by retrospectively analysing the clinicopathological data in patients with clinical T1-T2 prostate cancer treated by RP, as there can be prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence after RP in substantially many patients, and its character can differ according to ethnic group and/or country. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 1192 patients who had a RP from 1993 to 2002 with no neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy and whose PSA level after RP decreased at least once to undetectable levels (<0.2 ng/mL). PSA recurrence was defined as > or = 0.20 ng/mL. The patient data were collected from the Urological Oncology Study Group, a subgroup of Japan Clinical Oncology Group. RESULTS: The patients' median (range) age was 67 (47-83) years and their PSA level before RP was 8.7 (1.0-153) ng/mL. During the median follow-up of 45.6 months, 302 of the 1192 patients (25.3%) developed PSA recurrence. The median time to recurrence was 369 (61-2128) days after RP. A log-rank test showed that five significant clinicopathological factors were associated with PSA recurrence after RP: the percentage of prostate needle-biopsy cores with cancer, the biopsy Gleason score, PSA level before RP, pathological stage, and the Gleason score of the RP specimen (P < 0.001 for all). In multivariate analyses, the percentage of positive biopsy cores, PSA level before RP, pT and the Gleason score of the RP specimen were all independent significant predictors of PSA recurrence after RP in Japanese men. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of PSA recurrence after RP was 25.3% in Japan and the percentage of positive biopsy cores, PSA level before RP, pT and the Gleason score of the RP specimen were independent significant factors for PSA recurrence.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号