Optimal configuration of the spiral linking technique for tendon repair. Biomechanical evaluation

A previous study described a new spiral linking technique for tendon repairs and demonstrated that it was strong enough to be used in clinical practice as an alternative to the Pulvertaft tendon weave repair. However the repairs were less stiff, needed slightly more tendon length for the same repair and were a little bulkier. In this study two variables have been changed with a view to improving the spiral technique. At first the number of spirals was reduced consecutively, keeping the same number of standard mattress sutures. Once the optimal number of spirals had been identified, repairs with different numbers of sutures were tested using an alternative cross-stitch technique. The spiral repair technique using two spirals linked with six sutures was at least as strong and stiff as a four-weave Pulvertaft technique and was also easier to do.     

An in vitro biomechanical study comparing the spiral linking technique against the pulvertaft weave for tendon repair

A new spiral linking technique for tendon repair in which one end of the tendon is spiralled around the other end has been developed. Using pig trotter extensor tendons, the Pulvertaft weave technique was compared with this new technique. Twenty-five repairs using each technique were tested by tensile loading with an Instron testing machine. The spiral linking technique matched the strength of Pulvertaft method: the mean peak loads were 102 and 105 N, respectively. The Pulvertaft weave was stiffer than the spiral linking technique: mean stiffness of 11.1 and 6.7 N/mm, respectively. The spiral linking technique also absorbed considerably more energy: energy absorbed prior to failure to 90% of peak load, 1.75 and 1.13 kN mm, respectively. In conclusion, the spiral linking technique appears as strong as the Pulvertaft weave and we believe it is easier to perform.     

Local Autograft and Strong Pulvertaft Fixation Technique for Reconstruction of a Rerupture of the Extensor Hallucis Longus Tendon: A Case Report

There are different treatment options for extensor hallucis longus injuries. For primary repair, the end-to-end suture is recommended. The treatment of reruptures or tendon defects is challenging, and a wide range of procedures have been used in this regard, including primary and secondary repairs with and without auto- and allografts. To overcome the disadvantages of second-site morbidity and to achieve high primary stability, we demonstrate a technique using a local tendon graft in combination with a strong Pulvertaft suture technique in a case of rerupture of the extensor hallucis longus tendon.     

A biomechanical comparison of single and double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

BACKGROUND: The optimal method for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is not yet known. The hypothesis of the present study was that a double-row repair would demonstrate superior static and cyclic mechanical behavior when compared with a single-row repair. The specific aims were to measure gap formation at the bone-tendon interface under static creep loading and the ultimate strength and mode of failure of both methods of repair under cyclic loading. METHODS: A standardized tear of the supraspinatus tendon was created in sixteen fresh cadaveric shoulders. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs were performed with use of either a double-row technique (eight specimens) or a single-row technique (eight specimens) with nonabsorbable sutures that were double-loaded on a titanium suture anchor. The repairs were loaded statically for one hour, and the gap formation was measured. Cyclic loading to failure was then performed. RESULTS: Gap formation during static loading was significantly greater in the single-row group than in the double-row group (mean and standard deviation, 5.0 +/- 1.2 mm compared with 3.8 +/- 1.4 mm; p < 0.05). Under cyclic loading, the double-row repairs failed at a mean of 320 +/- 96.9 N whereas the single-row repairs failed at a mean of 224 +/- 147.9 N (p = 0.058). Three single-row repairs and three double-row repairs failed as a result of suture cut-through. Four single-row repairs and one double-row repair failed as a result of anchor or suture failure. The remaining five repairs did not fail, and a midsubstance tear of the tendon occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Although more technically demanding, the double-row technique demonstrates superior resistance to gap formation under static loading as compared with the single-row technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A double-row reconstruction of the supraspinatus tendon insertion may provide a more reliable construct than a single-row repair and could be used as an alternative to open reconstruction for the treatment of isolated tears.     

Biomechanical evaluation of flexor tendon graft with different repair techniques and graft surface modification

The purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical properties of modified repair techniques for flexor tendon reconstruction and the effects of surface modification using carbodiimide‐derivatized synovial fluid plus gelatin (cd‐SF‐G), compared to the traditional repair techniques. The second and fifth digits from 16 canine forepaws were randomly divided into 4 groups: (1) traditional graft repairs (TGR group) including distal Bunnell repair and proximal Pulvertaft weave repair; (2) modified graft repairs (MGR group) including distal graft bony attachment repair and proximal step‐cut repair; (3) group TGR coated with cd‐SF‐G (TGR‐C group); and (4) group MGR coated with cd‐SF‐G (MGR‐C group). Digit normalized work of flexion (nWOF), ultimate failure strength, and stiffness were measured. The nWOF in MGR group was significantly less than TGR group (p < 0.05). The nWOF in groups treated with cd‐SF‐G was significantly less than their untreated counterparts (p < 0.05). Ultimate load to failure of the MGR‐C group was significantly greater than the TGR‐C group (p < 0.05), but no significant difference in stiffness was found between these two groups. The modified techniques cannot only improve tendon gliding abilities but can also improve breaking strength. Additionally, surface modification with cd‐SF‐G significantly decreased the work of flexion. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 33:731–737, 2015.     

In vitro biomechanical study to compare the double-loop technique with the Pulvertaft weave for tendon anastomosis

The tensile strength of a double-loop technique for tendon anastomosis was compared with those of two modified Kessler techniques and the traditional Pulvertaft weave technique. The experiments were made on specimens of fresh human extensor tendon. The double-loop technique was significantly stronger than the other suture techniques.     

Ligamentous repair and reconstruction for posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow

We describe the intermediate results of lateral ligamentous repair or reconstruction for posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow. Between 1986 and 1999, we performed 12 direct repairs and 33 ligament reconstructions with a tendon autograft. One patient was lost to follow-up and 44 were retrospectively studied at a mean of six years (2 to 15). Surgery restored stability in all except five patients. In two the elbow became stable after a second procedure. The mean post-operative Mayo elbow performance score was 85 points (60 to 100). The result was classified as excellent in 19, good in 13, fair in seven and poor in five patients. Thirty-eight patients (86%) were subjectively satisfied with the outcome of the operation. Better results were obtained in patients with a post-traumatic aetiology (p = 0.03), those with subjective symptoms of instability at presentation (p = 0.006) and those who had an augmented reconstruction using a tendon graft (p = 0.04). Reconstruction using a tendon graft seems to provide better results than ligament repair and the results do not seem to deteriorate with time. The outcome of this procedure is less predictable in patients with no subjective instability.     

Biomechanical analysis of the cruciate four-strand flexor tendon repair

The purpose of this study was to develop and test in vitro a new flexor tendon suture technique that was simple and easy to perform, yet strong enough to withstand the projected forces of an in vivo active motion rehabilitation protocol. Forty human cadaveric flexor digitorum profundus tendons were divided and repaired using 1 of 4 suture techniques (the modified Kessler, the Strickland, the modified 4-strand Savage, and the Cruciate 4-strand repairs). Each repair was tested using a slow-test machine and displacement control at 2 mm/s. Force applied, the resultant gap, and ultimate tensile strength were recorded and statistical comparisons were performed using a two-tailed Student's t-test with level of significance set at p = .05. The Cruciate suture technique was demonstrated to be nearly twice as strong to 2-mm gap formation (44 N) compared with the Kessler, Strickland, and Savage repairs. Ultimate tensile strength was also significantly stronger for the Cruciate technique (56 N) than the Kessler, Strickland, or Savage repairs. The technique was significantly faster to perform than the Savage or Strickland repairs and was comparable in repair time to the 2-stranded Kessler repair. The design of the new suture technique allowed the tendon repair to be completed with the ease and speed of a 2-strand technique, but bestowed on the repair strength that exceeded current 4-strand techniques.     

Tensile strength of a new suture for fixation of tendon grafts when using a weave technique

PURPOSE: To evaluate a new corner stitch construct for tendon graft or tendon transfer fixation and compare the tensile strength with a conventional central cross-suture design in human cadaver tendons. METHODS: Flexor digitorum profundus tendons of the index, middle, and ring fingers (48 total) were used as recipients and palmaris longus, extensor indicis proprius, and extensor digitorum communis tendons of the index finger (48 total) were used as grafts from 16 fresh-frozen human cadaver hands. We compared the cross-stitch technique with a new corner stitch technique in tendon repairs made with 1, 2, or 3 weaves (8 per group). Tendons were sutured at each weave with either 2 full-thickness cross-stitches or 4 partial-thickness corner stitches of 4-0 nylon. Mattress sutures also were placed through the free tendon end for each repair type. The tensile strength of the tendon-graft composite was measured with a materials testing machine. RESULTS: The tensile strength of the repairs increased significantly with the number of weaves. When 2 or 3 weaves were used with the corner stitch or when 3 weaves were used with the cross-stitch, the repairs were significantly stronger. Although no significant difference in strength to failure was noted when comparing cross and corner stitches with equivalent numbers of weaves, qualitatively there was a difference in mode of failure with the 3-weave corner stitches failing primarily by intrasubstance tendon failure and the 3-weave cross-stitch repairs failing by tendon pullout. CONCLUSIONS: The corner stitch is as strong as conventional cross-stitch repairs and its superficial placement may be more favorable to tendon blood supply. This repair may be advantageous for clinical applications.     

A biomechanical analysis of suture materials and their influence on a four-strand flexor tendon repair

PURPOSE: Flexor tendon repair strength depends on the suture technique and the suture material used. Configurations that incorporate locking loops prevent sutures from pulling through the tendon but typically fail because of suture breakage. The choice of suture material therefore influences repair strength. This study investigated the mechanical properties of 5 nonabsorbable 4-0 suture materials (monofilament nylon, monofilament polypropylene, braided polyester, braided stainless steel wire, and braided polyethylene) and evaluated their performance when used in a locking 4-strand flexor tendon repair configuration. METHODS: Five samples of 2 strands of each suture type were tested mechanically to determine the material stiffness and ultimate load. In addition, 50 fresh porcine flexor tendons were divided and repaired with each of the 5 suture materials using a 4-strand single-cross technique. Gap force, ultimate strength, and stiffness were measured to compare biomechanical performance. RESULTS: All repairs failed by suture rupture at the locking loop. Fibrewire and stainless-steel sutures and repairs were significantly stronger and stiffer than the other suture types. The results for Prolene and Ethibond were similar in the tendon repair groups with respect to gap and ultimate forces although Ethibond provided significantly increased repair stiffness. Nylon sutures and repairs consistently produced the poorest mechanical performance in all outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Suture material strongly influences the biomechanical performance of multistrand tendon repairs and is an important consideration for the surgeon. Fibrewire and stainless steel are the most biomechanically suitable suture materials for flexor tendon repair whereas nylon is the least suitable. Further developments in suture materials are important for advancements in flexor tendon repair strength.     

Locking repairs for obliquely cut tendons: Effects of suture purchase and directions of locking circles

PURPOSE: Oblique cuts in tendons weaken conventional repairs but locking sutures improve the repair strength of the tendon. In this study we assessed how suture purchase and direction (or type) of locking sutures affect the repair strength. METHODS: Ninety-three fresh pig flexor tendons were transected obliquely (45 degrees to the long axis of the tendon) and repaired with either a locking Kessler repair (with perpendicular or horizontal locking circles) or a locking cruciate method (with oblique locking or perpendicular locking circles). The suture purchase in the short side of the tendon stump with a perpendicular locking Kessler repair ranged from 0.3 to 1.2 cm. The gap formation and ultimate strength were measured to compare the biomechanical performance for each repair. RESULTS: The repair strength increased significantly as the suture purchase increased from 0.3 to 1.0 cm in oblique tendon lacerations, with a suture span of 1.0 cm being the strongest. The strength decreased significantly when the span was 1.2 cm. The repairs with horizontal locking sutures were significantly weaker than those with perpendicular locking sutures. The locking cruciate repair with the perpendicular locking circles had strength identical to that of the cruciate with oblique locking circles. CONCLUSIONS: Both suture purchase and the direction of locking circles affect the repair strength remarkably. For locking repairs the suture purchase of 1.0 cm in an obliquely cut tendon produced the highest strength; the repairs with a purchase less than 0.4 cm had significantly reduced strength. The strength of the repairs with locking circles perpendicular to the long axis of the tendon was significantly greater than that of the repairs with locking circles parallel to the long axis of the tendon.     

A simple, semirigid, and surgeon-friendly tendon retriever and flexor sheath dilator

The repair of flexor tendons remains a challenge to the hand surgeon, and zone II repair requires a trained and experienced surgeon for good results. If the tendon has retracted proximally, however, its retrieval through the inflamed and swollen flexor sheath in acute cases and through a shrunken flexor sheath in case of a delayed repair/reconstruction can test any surgeon's skill and patience. Although there are many methods described in the literature for tendon retrieval, most are either not successful or are traumatic to the tendon or its fibrous sheath. We herein describe a semirigid tendon retriever that can be made intraoperatively and is useful in both acute and delayed repairs/reconstructions. The extremely low cost is a special feature. It has been proven to be a simple and effective method of tendon retrieval and also a flexor sheath dilator in delayed repairs/reconstructions.     

Tendon repair using flexor tendon splints: An experimental study

Mechanical strength of tendon repair using Dacron tendon splints across the laceration site were evaluated in human cadaver profundus tendons; the splints were placed both on the dorsal surface and internally within the tendon substance. Comparison was made to modified Kessler, Becker, and Savage repair techniques. Ultimate tensile strength was 2.55 kgf for the Kessler, 3.00 kgf for the Becker, 8.29 kgf for the Savage, 8.46 kgf for the internal tendon splint, and 8.10 kgf for the dorsal tendon splint; the Savage and both Tendon Splints techniques had significant higher tensile strength than the Kessler and Becker. Gap strength was 1.44 kgf for the Kessler, 2.22 kgf for the Becker, 2.45 kgf for the Savage, 2.05 kgf for internal tendon splint, and 3.15 kgf for the dorsal tendon splint. The dorsal tendon splint technique showed significant greater gap strength than the other four techniques. There was no significant difference in the magnitude of the gap during cyclic testing of these techniques; however, three of seven Kessler repairs failed and one of six Becker repairs failed. The results of these cadaver studies suggest that both tendon splint repair techniques are comparable to the Savage and may have sufficient strength to allow postoperative active motion against minimal resistance. Further in vivo testing is in order.     

Repair of acute and chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures using the EndoButton

There are many ways to repair distal biceps tendon ruptures with no outcome studies demonstrating superiority of a specific technique. There are few studies reporting on the repair of acute and chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures using the EndoButton via an anterior single-incision approach. We report on 27 patients who underwent distal biceps tendon repair with an EndoButton. The average age was 50.1 years (range, 36–78). There were 17 acute repairs (within 4 weeks of injury), nine chronic repairs (greater than 4 weeks), and one revision of a previous acute repair. All chronic repairs were repaired without the need for graft augmentation. Patients were assessed postoperatively using the ASES elbow outcome instrument and isokinetic flexion and supination strength and endurance testing. Eight control subjects were also tested for comparison. At an average follow-up of 30.9 months, 26 of 27 patients returned to their previous employment and activity level. The average ASES elbow score was 98.2 (range, 81–100). Compared with the contralateral extremity, there was no loss of motion. Average flexion strength recovery was 101% and mean supination strength recovery was 99%. There was no significant difference in function or strength with repair of acute versus chronic ruptures. Using the EndoButton technique, acute and chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures can be repaired safely with excellent clinical results.     

Suture materials and suture techniques used in tendon repair

Immediately after a tendon repair, the tendon contributes nothing to the strength of repair. During that time, the suture itself and suture technique are the sole contributors to the strength of repair. Although stainless steel is the strongest material that can be used at the time of repair, it has serious disadvantages. It is difficult to work with and makes a bulky knot. Conversely, all absorbable sutures become too weak too soon to be of value. At this time, nonabsorbable, synthetic fibers that are relatively strong, such as Supramid or prolene, are the most desirable materials available. Regarding suture techniques, the lateral trap and end-weave techniques produce the strongest repairs; however, the end-weave technique can only be used with tendon grafts and the lateral trap, though it can be used for end-to-end primary repairs. It is too bulky for use in the fingers and hand but is ideal for the forearm and wrist. In the hand and fingers, the strongest repair techniques available are the Bunnell, Kessler, and Mason-Allen; however, the Bunnell stitch is more strangulating to the microcirculation of the tendon than the latter two stitches; thus, it contributes to tendomalacia and gap formation. The simplest and least traumatic suture technique, though weakest at first, will allow tendon healing to proceed more rapidly. If such a repair is protected from tension by splinting the wrist and metacarpophalangeal joints in flexion during healing (while allowing controlled passive motion of the finger joints), there will be a rapid increase in tensile strength of the tendon juncture with minimal gap formation, as the repaired hand is progressively stressed up until about 90 days postrepair. At that point, strength plateaus and maximum stress can be applied to the repaired tendon. Somewhere between three and six weeks post-tendon repair, the suture material and technique become secondary to tendon healing as the primary provider of tensile strength to the tendon wound. The less traumatic suture techniques facilitate closure of the tendon sheath, which not only acts as a mechanical barrier to the ingrowth of extrasheath adhesion, which produces fibroblasts, but also re-establishes the continuity of the synovial fluid system, which is a major source of nutrition to the tendon. The healing tendon then can be thought of as a delicate structure, one not to be overmanipulated, traumatized, strangulated, or stretched.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Experimental rotator cuff repair. A preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: The repair of chronic, massive rotator cuff tears is associated with a high rate of failure. Prospective studies comparing different repair techniques are difficult to design and carry out because of the many factors that influence structural and clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to develop a suitable animal model for evaluation of the efficacy of different repair techniques for massive rotator cuff tears and to use this model to compare a new repair technique, tested in vitro, with the conventional technique. METHODS: We compared two techniques of rotator cuff repair in vivo using the left shoulders of forty-seven sheep. With the conventional technique, simple stitches were used and both suture ends were passed transosseously and tied over the greater tuberosity of the humerus. With the other technique, the modified Mason-Allen stitch was used and both suture ends were passed transosseously and tied over a cortical-bone-augmentation device. This device consisted of a poly(L/D-lactide) plate that was fifteen millimeters long, ten millimeters wide, and two millimeters thick. Number-3 braided polyester suture material was used in all of the experiments. RESULTS: In pilot studies (without prevention of full weight-bearing), most repairs failed regardless of the technique that was used. The simple stitch always failed by the suture pulling through the tendon or the bone; the suture material did not break or tear. The modified Mason-Allen stitch failed in only two of seventeen shoulders. In ten shoulders, the suture material failed even though the stitches were intact. Thus, we concluded that the modified Mason-Allen stitch is a more secure method of achieving suture purchase in the tendon. In eight of sixteen shoulders, the nonaugmented double transosseous bone-fixation technique failed by the suture pulling through the bone. The cortical-bone-augmentation technique never failed. In definite studies, prevention of full weight-bearing was achieved by fixation of a ten-centimeter-diameter ball under the hoof of the sheep. This led to healing in eight of ten shoulders repaired with the modified Mason-Allen stitch and cortical-bone augmentation. On histological analysis, both the simple-stitch and the modified Mason-Allen technique caused similar degrees of transient localized tissue damage. Mechanical pullout tests of repairs with the new technique showed a failure strength that was approximately 30 percent of that of an intact infraspinatus tendon at six weeks, 52 percent of that of an intact tendon at three months, and 81 percent of that of an intact tendon at six months. CONCLUSIONS: The repair technique with a modified Mason-Allen stitch with number-3 braided polyester suture material and cortical-bone augmentation was superior to the conventional repair technique. Use of the modified Mason-Allen stitch and the cortical-bone-augmentation device transferred the weakest point of the repair to the suture material rather than to the bone or the tendon. Failure to protect the rotator cuff post-operatively was associated with an exceedingly high rate of failure, even if optimum repair technique was used. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Different techniques for rotator cuff repair substantially influence the rate of failure. A modified Mason-Allen stitch does not cause tendon necrosis, and use of this stitch with cortical-bone augmentation yields a repair that is biologically well tolerated and stronger in vivo than a repair with the conventional technique. Unprotected repairs, however, have an exceedingly high rate of failure even if optimum repair technique is used. Postoperative protection from tension overload, such as with an abduction splint, may be necessary for successful healing of massive rotator cuff tears.     

Zone II tendon repairs augmented with autogenous dorsal tendon graft: a biomechanical analysis

We investigated the biomechanical properties of a new technique for tendon repair that reinforces a standard suture with an autogenous tendon graft. A dynamic in situ testing apparatus was used to test 40 flexor digitorum profundus tendons harvested from fresh-frozen cadaver hands. The tendons were cut and repaired using 1 of 4 suture techniques: 2-strand modified Kessler, 4-strand modified Kessler, 6-strand modified Savage, and 2-strand modified Kessler augmented with autogenous dorsal tendon graft. The augmented repair uses 1 slip of the flexor digitorum superficialis tendon secured to the dorsal surface of the repair site with a continuous stitch. Ultimate tensile strength, resistance to gap formation, and work of flexion were measured simultaneously on an in situ tensile testing apparatus. No significant difference in tensile strength was found between the augmented repair and the 6-strand Savage repair. The augmented repair and the 6-strand Savage repair showed significantly greater ultimate tensile strength than the 2- and 4-strand repairs. The augmented repair had significantly greater resistance to 2 mm gap formation than the other 3 repairs. We were unable to show a significant difference in work of flexion between the repairs with the numbers tested (n = 10). Our findings suggest that the augmented repair is strong enough to tolerate the projected forces generated during active motion without dehiscence or gap formation at the repair site.     

Cyclic loading of Achilles tendon repairs: a comparison of polyester and polyblend suture

BACKGROUND: Early functional rehabilitation is widely used after open suture repair of the Achilles tendon. To our knowledge, no previous studies have assessed gap formation from cyclic loading and subsequent failure loads of simulated Achilles tendon repairs. A synthetic (polyblend) suture has been introduced for tendon repairs with reportedly greater strength than polyester suture. This stronger, stiffer suture material may provide stronger repairs with less elongation of the tendon repair. METHODS: Simulated Achilles tendon ruptures in bovine Achilles tendon were repaired with a four-strand Krackow suture technique using No. 2 polyester suture. Specimens were loaded for 3,000 cycles at maximal loads of 50, 75, 100, or 125 N, and gap formation at the repair site was continuously measured. After cyclic loading, each specimen was loaded to failure. Identical repairs were performed with number 2 polyblend suture and cyclically loaded to 75 N for 3,000 cycles. All specimens were loaded to failure. RESULTS: Cyclically loading polyester suture repairs to 50, 75, 100, or 125 N for 3,000 cycles resulted in mean gapping at the repair site of 3.0 +/- 0.8, 4.9 +/- 1.0, 7.2 +/- 0.9, and 7.9 +/- 0.8 mm, respectively. Cyclically loading the polyblend suture repairs for 3,000 cycles at 75 N, resulted in 3.3 +/- 0.3 mm of gap formation at the repair site, significantly less than polyester suture repairs (p < 0.001). The mean load to failure for polyester suture repair was 222 +/- 19 N and for polyblend suture repair was 582 +/- 49 N, a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Gap formation at 100, 1,000, and 2,000 cycles, as a percentage of total gap formation at 3,000 cycles, was 64.3%, 87.5%, and 95.4% for polyester suture and 45.8%, 78.5%, and 90.1% for polyblend repairs. All specimens in all groups failed at the knots during load-to-failure testing. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclic loading of simulated Achilles tendon repairs using a Krackow, four-core polyester suture technique showed progressive gap formation with increasing load. All repairs failed at the knot, and suture pull-out from tendon was not observed. Polyblend suture repair, when compared to identical repairs with braided polyester suture, resulted in a 260% higher load to failure and 33% less gap formation at the repair site after 3,000 cycles. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of polyblend suture in a four-stranded Krackow configuration provides stronger repairs with less gap formation, which may provide increased security during early functional rehabilitation.     

Surgical repair of chronic rupture of the distal end of the biceps brachii. A modified anterior surgical repair technique

The authors have used a modified surgical technique for repair of the distal end of the biceps brachii in three patients who presented with chronic rupture, all more than 6 weeks old. All patients were males; two lesions were on the dominant right side and one was on the non-dominant left side. An anterior incision was made over the cubital fossa, a hole was drilled over the radial tuberosity and a simple pull-through technique with an Ethibond suture was used to attach the tendon to an endobutton over the posterior surface of the radius. All patients returned to their employment and preinjury activity levels by six months. There were no postoperative complications and clinically all repairs remained intact. The patients regained their normal range of movements in 3 months; all but one regained the endurance and strength of their bicep in 6 months as assessed by Cybex testing. Surgical repair of the distal end of the biceps using the technique reported has given excellent results in these three patients.     

Comparative biomechanic performances of locked cruciate four-strand flexor tendon repairs in an ex vivo porcine model

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of 3 different locking configurations on repair strength when used in a cruciate four-strand repair. METHODS: Sixty fresh porcine flexor tendons were transected and repaired with cruciate four-strand core suture repairs with 3 different locking configurations: simple locks (a modification of the Pennigton method), circle locks, and cross locks. Half of the repairs in each locking group were reinforced with a peripheral suture. The tendon repairs were subjected to linear load-to-failure testing. Outcome measures were 2-mm gap force and ultimate tensile strength. RESULTS: The cross lock repair had significantly greater 2-mm gap force and ultimate tensile strength than the simple lock repair, both with and without a peripheral suture. The cross lock repair showed significantly greater 2-mm gap force without a peripheral suture and significantly greater ultimate tensile strength with a peripheral suture than the circle lock repair. With peripheral reinforcement, the cross lock cruciate repair had a mean 2-mm gap force of 92 N and ultimate tensile strength of 119 N. The cross lock cruciate repair consistently produced the strongest biomechanic performance in all outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Locking configuration influences the biomechanic performance of cruciate four-strand flexor tendon repairs. Our results suggest that the cruciate repair with cross locks is stronger than repairs with simple locks or circle locks. Whether the results of this ex vivo porcine linear model can be translated to the clinical arena is unknown, because the factors of tendon/sheath friction, tendon healing, and compromised tendon viability from the lock were not addressed.