射频消融联合医用臭氧治疗包容性腰椎间盘突出症的疗效分析

目的:评价射频消融联合医用臭氧治疗包容性腰椎间盘突出症的疗效及安全性。方法:包容性腰椎间盘突出症患者210例,按住院顺序编号分为射频消融组(A组)、医用臭氧组(B组)和射频消融联合医用臭氧组(C组),每组70例。在术前和术后7 d、30 d、90 d、180 d进行视觉模拟评分(VAS)、OSWESTRY功能障碍指数问卷评分(ODI)。结果:与术前相比,3组术后7 d、30 d、90 d、180 d的平均VAS及平均ODI评分均显著降低(P0.01);A组和B组在术后7 d、30 d、90 d、180 d的平均VAS及平均ODI差异无统计学意义(P0.05);C组在术后7 d、30 d、90 d、180 d的平均VAS及平均ODI评分均显著低于A、B组(P0.05)。所有患者手术经过顺利,术中及术后未发生并发症。结论:射频消融或医用臭氧治疗包容性腰椎间盘突出症安全有效,两者联合应用可明显提高疗效。     

双平板DSA引导下经皮穿刺臭氧消融术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效观察（附37例报告）

目的：观察双平板DSA及其类CT功能在经皮穿刺臭氧消融术治疗腰椎间盘突出症中的应用及临床疗效。方法回顾性分析37例腰腿疼痛或麻木患者,平均年龄（49.38±13.05）岁,共44个病变椎间盘,经CT或MRI证实为腰椎间盘突出症,在双平板DSA设备透视引导下行经皮穿刺臭氧消融术,术中每个椎间盘内注射臭氧4～25 mL（平均13.82±3.62 mL）,盘外神经根周围注射臭氧0～15 mL（平均7.73±2.87 mL）,并于盘内外注射曲安奈德水针共5 mL。观察术前及术后1周、1个月、3个月、6个月、1年腰腿疼痛变化情况,同时观察术中术后并发症发生情况。结果37例患者中,34例于臭氧消融术后腰腿疼痛VAS评分明显下降,并且疼痛缓解时间大于1年,改良Macnab疗效评定总有效率91.89%;3例疼痛缓解不明显,其中1例出现椎间盘感染。结论双平板DSA引导下经皮穿刺臭氧消融术治疗腰椎间盘突出症,创伤小,并发症少,止痛效果确切。     

CT区域定位和X线引导下射频消融联合臭氧注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效比较

【目的】比较X线引导和CT区域定位经皮穿刺射频消融联合臭氧注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症（LDH）的临床效果。【方法12009年6月至2012年4月将采取在x线透视引导下行射频消融联合臭氧注射治疗LDH63例定为A组;将区域定位CT引导下行射频消融联合臭氧注射治疗LDH49例定为B组。依据视觉模拟疼痛评分（VAS）及Macnab评价标准评估治疗效果,观察术前、术后1周、3个月、12个月VAS评分及术后12个月优良率。【结果】两组术后VAs评分与本组术前比较均有显著下降（P〈0．05）,术后1周、3个月、12个月两组VAS评分B组稍低于A组,但差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）;术后各时段B组优良率均显著优于A组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。【结论】术前“区域定位”能够将椎间盘突出位置量化,准确把握适应证;术中CT引导能够为靶点射频热凝确定准确的穿刺路径及深度,使射频消融联合臭氧注射技术疗效最大化,对提高微创治疗LDH的优良率有重要临床意义。     

CT引导下臭氧联合经皮射频热凝注射治疗颈椎间盘突出症

目的:观察经皮穿刺盘内臭氧髓核化学溶解联合射频热凝治疗颈椎间盘突出症的临床效果。方法:颈椎间盘突出症患者528例,分为臭氧组264例,臭氧+射频组264例。均在CT引导下经颈前血管鞘和气管鞘之间穿刺入椎间盘髓核或突出物靶点。臭氧组每个盘内注射浓度为50μg/ml的臭氧4 ml。臭氧+射频组盘内注射浓度为50μg/ml的臭氧后再行髓核或/和突出物射频热凝,设定最高温度为90℃,时间为4个周期。观察治疗后各个时期的疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analoguescale,VAS)以及临床效果。记录治疗过程中及治疗后的并发症。结果:治疗后不同时期(24小时、1周、1个月、3个月及6个月)疼痛VAS评分与术前相比显著改善。且臭氧+射频组在治疗后3个月及6个月的VAS评分较臭氧组明显降低。治疗后6个月,臭氧组优良率为80.3%,臭氧+射频组优良率为86.5%。无一例发生严重并发症。结论:CT引导下经皮穿刺臭氧髓核化学溶解联合射频热凝是治疗颈椎间盘突出症有效的方法之一。     

射频热凝联合臭氧介入治疗腰椎间盘突出症的研究

目的：研究射频消融联合臭氧介入治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效。方法：将231例腰椎间盘突出症患者随机分为3组,分别进行射频消融、臭氧介入和两者联合治疗,采用视觉模拟评分（VAS）和（MacNab）标准分析3种方法的疗效。结果：比较231例腰椎间盘突出症患者术后不同时间的疗效,MacNab标准分析结果,联合组优良率明显高于其他2组（P＜0.05）;VAS评分后,联合组均明显优于射频组和臭氧组（P＜0.05）。结论：射频消融联合臭氧介入治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效显著,是一种临床上值得推广的好方法。     

Disc-FX系统治疗包容性腰椎间盘突出症疗效观察

目的探讨Disc-FX系统经皮腰椎髓核摘除、射频消融术治疗包容性腰椎间盘突出症的近期疗效。方法对36 例患者进行回顾性分析。结果36 例患者术后JOA评分系统评分、视觉模拟评分(VAS)及疼痛功能指数评分(Oswestry 2.0)较术前明显改善(P<0.01)。结论Disc-FX系统是治疗包容性腰椎间盘突出症的有效方法。     

Intradiscal Thermal Annuloplasty for Discogenic Pain: An Outcome Study

Objectives: Published studies of intradiscal thermal annuloplasty (IDTA) have shown at most 50% pain relief as an improved outcome with little focus on functional improvement in the treatment of discogenic pain. Previous studies have used a number of criteria for patient selection including low back pain unresponsive to conservative care, no compressive radiculopathy, positive provocative discography and absence of previous surgery at the same symptomatic level. The purpose of present study is to examine the hypothesis that additional inclusion criteria for patient selection such as disc height, absence of degenerative disc disease (DDD) in untreated discs, absence of herniated nucleus pulposus or lumbar canal stenosis may improve the outcome of treatment. Methods: In this prospective case‐series study additional criteria of patient selection were introduced, namely disc height of at least 50%, no lumbar canal stenosis, one or two levels of DDD, no evidence of nucleus pulposus herniation on magnetic resonance image. Thirty‐four patients were enrolled in the study and 32 of them were followed over a period of 12 months. The visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and seven activities of daily living (ADLs) were followed and reported on a scale from 0 to 10. Results: Sustained decrease of the VAS pain scores was observed from 3 to 12 months following IDTA. ADLs improved in all patients between 3 and 12 months post‐treatment. Patients in the Bureau of Workers Compensation (BWC) group had a higher VAS score but showed the same level of improvement in ADLs as compared to commercial insurance or self‐pay patients. In the non‐BWC patient group an average VAS pain score decrease of more than 6 points on a 10‐point scale was reported at 6 to 12 months following IDTA. Conclusions: We found dramatic improvement of pain scores and ADLs following IDTA when strict patient selection was applied. We believe that IDTA is an effective, minimally invasive treatment for discogenic pain in properly selected patients.     

Pfirrmann分级对髓核成形术治疗包容性腰椎间盘突出症临床疗效分析

目的:探讨MRI Pfirrmann分级在等离子消融髓核成形术治疗包容性腰椎间盘突出症中的临床意义。方法:32例经X线片、MRI影像学检查,并结合临床表现明确诊断为包容性椎间盘突出症患者,在C型臂或CT引导下采用等离子髓核成形术治疗。记录术前责任间盘MRI Pfirrmann分级,观察术前及术后7 d、1个月、3个月、6个月、12个月疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)、改良Macnab疗效标准评价的疗效。结果:髓核成形术后1月疼痛缓解率平均为63.5%,优良率为76.6%;12月疼痛缓解率平均为60%,优良率为63.3%。术前与术后VAS和ODI比较有统计学差异。PfirrmannⅢ级组12月疼痛缓解率为64%,优良率为87.5%;PfirrmannⅣ级组12月疼痛缓解率为41%,优良率为45.5%。两组组间疗效有统计学差异。结论:回顾性分析显示等离子髓核成形术的临床疗效与椎间盘退化程度有关,Pfirrmann分级系统对等离子消融髓核成形术治疗椎间盘突出症术前合理选择患者,术后疗效的评价具有重要的临床价值。     

麦肯基疗法联合腰部核心肌力训练治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效观察

目的:观察麦肯基疗法联合腰部核心肌力训练治疗腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的临床疗效。方法:80例LDH患者随机分为对照组与观察组各40例,2组患者均给予常规康复治疗,包括牵引、超短波治疗等;观察组增加麦肯基疗法与腰部核心肌力训练,均接受4周治疗,并分别于治疗前后选用Oswestry下腰背功能障碍指数(ODI)、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)及临床疗效进行评定。结果:治疗4周后,2组患者ODI及VAS评分较治疗前均有降低(P<0.05),且观察组较对照组评分更低(P<0.05);治疗后2组临床疗效比较,观察组总有效率明显优于对照组(92.50%,77.50%,P<0.05)。结论:麦肯基疗法联合腰部核心肌力训练治疗腰椎间盘突出症有更好的疗效,治疗周期短且见效快,值得临床推广应用。     

联合微创技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的个体化选择

目的：探讨联合应用激光汽化减压（percutaneous laser disc discompression,PLDD）、射频热凝靶点消融、臭氧注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症的的个体化选择。方法：自2006年6月,在CT引导下选择性联合应用PLDD、射频和臭氧治疗腰椎间盘突出症患者267例,突出椎间盘的特点个体化选择穿刺路径和治疗方法;其中PLDD联合臭氧治疗92例（A组）,射频联合臭氧治疗67例（B组）,PLDD、射频和臭氧三者联合治疗108例（C组）。结果：所有患者均顺利完成手术,于术后1周、1个月,3个月及6个月随访记录VAS评分和Macanab优良率。三组患者VAS评分经方差分析,手术前、后有显著性差异（P〈0.05）,术后1周至6个月的VAS评分统计无显著性差异（P〉0.05）;术后三组间VAS评分、Macanab优良率比较无显著性差异（P〉0.05）。结论：选择性联合应用微创技术进行个体化的立体治疗,具有扩大微创手术适应症、提高手术疗效的优势,值得推广和利用。     

Influences of spinal decompression therapy and general traction therapy on the pain,disability, and straight leg raising of patients with intervertebral disc herniation

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to identify how spinal decompression therapy and general traction therapy influence the pain, disability, and straight leg raise (SLR) ability of patients with intervertebral disc herniation. [Subjects] The subjects were 30 patients with chronic lumbar pain who were divided into a spinal decompression therapy group (SDTG, n=15), and a general traction therapy group (GTTG, n=15). [Methods] The SDTG used a spinal decompression device, and the GTTG used a lumbar traction device. Both groups received conservative physical therapy three times a week for four weeks. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to measure the degree of pain the patients with chronic lumbar pain. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was used to measure the degree of functional disability. A goniometer was used to measure the patients’ SLR ability. [Results] Both SDTG and GTTG showed statistically significant decreases in VAS and ODI scores and a statistically significant increase in SLR angle. A comparison of the two groups found no statistically significant differences. [Conclusion] Spinal decompression therapy and general traction therapy are effective at improving the pain, disability, and SLR of patients with intervertebral disc herniation. Thus, selective treatment may be required.Key words: Spinal decompression therapy, Pain, Straight leg raise     

融合联合非融合固定治疗腰椎退行性病

目的探讨融合联合非融合固定联合治疗腰椎退行性病的临床疗效。方法选取我院2006年5月～2011年12月作者采用融合联合非融合固定治疗腰椎间蕊突出症患者42例及腰椎滑脱合并椎间盘突出症30例。术后患者获得平均19（6--50）个月的随访,采用视觉模拟评分法（VAS）及腰椎功能障碍指数（ODI）评定患者手术后的治疗疗效。结果本组患者术后均无感染、神经根损伤、脑脊液漏等并发症发生。VAS及ODI评定结果显示患者术后VAS及ODI分值改善优于术前,手术前后比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）。结论融合联合非融合固定治疗腰椎退行性病减压效果明显、固定可靠,有效减缓了相邻椎间盘退变,是治疗腰椎退行性病的一种有效方法。     

侧卧位与俯卧位椎间盘切除术治疗老年腰椎间盘突出症的对比研究

【目的】前瞻性对比研究侧卧位与俯卧位椎间盘切除术治疗老年腰椎间盘突出症的临床效果差别。【方法】对47例65岁以上老年腰椎间盘突出症患者行单节段小切口开窗椎间盘切除手术,23例行俯卧位手术（俯卧组）,24例无法耐受俯卧位者行侧卧位手术（侧卧组）。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、手术疗效的差异,术前及术后3个月、6个月、12个月、24个月、48个月进行VAS、ODI评分,末次随访按改良Macnab标准评价疗效。【结果]45例获得术后4年随访。侧卧组比俯卧组术中出血量少（P〈0．01）,术后各时间点两组VAs及0DI均无统计学差异。术后4年两组优良率无统计学差异（91．4％VS91．0％,P〉0．05）。【结论】对于不能耐受俯卧体位的老年患者,侧卧位椎间盘切除术仍能取得满意的中期疗效。     

腰骶灵活性训练对腰椎间盘突出症患者干预效果的临床研究

目的观察腰骶灵活性训练对于腰椎间盘突出症患者活动度、疼痛和功能障碍的影响。方法前瞻性选取空军特色医学中心收治的腰椎间盘突出症患者51例,按照随机分组方法分为实验组(n=27)和对照组(n=24),两组患者均接受以冯氏脊柱定点旋转复位法为主的保守治疗,试验组患者在此基础上增加腰骶灵活性训练,即改良的腰骶猫式动作、仰卧位骨盆前后倾、骨盆侧屈、骨盆侧旋共4个动作,15个/组,2组/d,5 d/周,为期3周。在干预前后比较两组患者的坐位活动度、站位活动度、腰椎延展性以及主观疼痛(VAS评分)和功能障碍程度(ODI指数)。结果相比于对照组,实验组患者站立位腰椎屈曲延展性显著改善,差异具有统计学意义(t=2.557,P=0.014);站立位屈曲活动度(t=-3.035,P=0.004)、屈曲+右侧屈+右侧旋(t=-3.345,P=0.002)以及屈曲+左侧屈+左侧旋(t=-4.072,P=0.000)活动度均增加;VAS评分(t=2.908,P=0.008)和ODI指数(t=2.095,P=0.047)均显著减小,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腰骶灵活性训练能够改善腰椎间盘突出症患者腰椎的延展性,增加腰椎的活动度,改善腰椎-骨盆节律,改善前屈及前屈对角线动作的功能动作能力,并能够帮助腰椎间盘突出症患者缓解疼痛和主观功能障碍程度。     

核心稳定性训练结合深层肌肉刺激对腰椎间盘突出症患者术后功能恢复的影响

目的探讨核心稳定性训练结合深层肌肉刺激对腰椎间盘突出症患者术后功能恢复的影响。方法选取2016年8月至2018年8月我院收治的91例腰椎间盘突出症拟手术治疗患者为研究对象,根据其术后康复意愿将患者分为研究组46例和对照组45例,对照组实施常规深层肌肉刺激康复护理,研究组在此基础上实施核心稳定性训练,比较两组患者腰腿痛程度(VAS)、腰椎疾患综合标准评分(JOA)及脊椎功能障碍程度评分(ODI)。结果30 d后,研究组患者VAS,JOA,ODI评分均低于对照组(P<0.05);随访后1年,研究组腰椎间盘突出症复发率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论腰椎间盘突出症手术治疗后应用核心稳定训练结合深层肌肉刺激康复护理,可有效缓解腰椎和腰腿部疼痛程度,改善脊椎功能障碍程度,有利于患者早日回归正常生活和工作。     

Ozone therapy versus surgery for lumbar disc herniation: A randomized double-blind controlled trial

ObjectivesSurgery is the treatment of choice for symptomatic disc herniation after conservative management. Several studies have suggested the potential utility of intradiscal ozone infiltration in this pathology. The aim of this trial was to compare intradiscal ozone infiltration vs. oxygen infiltration vs. surgery.Design and interventionsThis was a randomized, double-blinded, and controlled trial in patients on a waiting list for herniated disc surgery. There were three treatment groups: surgery; intradiscal ozone infiltration (plus foraminal infiltration of ozone, steroids, and anesthetic); intradiscal oxygen infiltration (plus foraminal infiltration of oxygen, steroids, and anesthetic).Main outcome measuresThe requirements for surgery.ResultsFive years after the treatment of the last recruited patient (median follow-up: 78 months), the requirement for further surgery was 20 % for patients in the ozone group and 60 % for patients in the oxygen group. 11 % of patients initially treated with surgery also required a second surgery. Compared to the surgery group, the ozone group showed: 1) significantly lower number of inpatient days: median 3 days (interquartile range: 3–3.5 days) vs. 0 days (interquartile range: 0–1.5 days), p = 0.012; 2) significantly lower costs: median EUR 3702 (interquartile range: EUR 3283–7630) vs. EUR 364 (interquartile range: EUR 364–2536), p = 0.029.ConclusionsOur truncated trial showed that intradiscal ozone infiltrations decreased the requirements for conventional surgery, resulting in decreased hospitalization durations and associated costs. These findings and their magnitude are of interest to patients and health services providers. Further validation is ongoing.     

Intradiscal electrothermal treatment for chronic discogenic low back pain: a prospective outcome study with minimum 1-year follow-up. (SOAR, Physiatry Medical Group, Menlo Park, CA) Spine 2000;25:2622–2627.

This prospective case series study was to determine the outcome of patients with chronic low back pain whose symptoms did not improve with aggressive nonoperative care and who chose intradiscal electrothermal anuloplasty (IDET) as an alternative to chronic pain management or interbody fusion surgery. Sixty‐two patients who had chronic low back pain unresponsive to nonoperative care, no evidence of compressive radiculopathy, and concordant pain reproduction at one or more disc levels on provocative discography were enrolled in the study. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores Short Form (SF)‐36 Health Status Questionnaire Physical Function subscale, and SF‐36 Bodily Pain subscale scores were assessed at baseline and at least 1 year later. Mean follow‐up was 16 months, and mean preoperative duration of symptoms was 60 months. Baseline and follow‐up outcome measures demonstrated a mean change in VAS score of 3.0, mean change in SF‐36 physical function of 20, and mean change in SF bodily function of 17. Symptoms improved in 44 (71%) of 62 of the study group on the SF‐36 physical function subscale, in 46 (74%) of 62 on the SF‐36 Bodily Pain subscale, and in 44 (71%) of 62 on the VAS scores. Twelve (19%) of 62 did not show improvement on any scale. Conclude a cohort of patients with chronic unremitting low back pain of discogenic origin whose symptoms had failed to improve with aggressive nonoperative care demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement on the SF‐36 and the VAS scores at a minimum follow‐up of 1 year after IDET. The positive results should be validated with placebo‐controlled randomized trials and studies that compare IDET with alternative treatments. Comment by Gabor B. Racz, M.D. This is a report on 62 patients from a single practice where the diagnosis of discogenic pain was made. Prior to and at the end of 12‐months, visual analog pain scores and short form (SF‐36 Health Status Questionnaire Physical Function subscale and SF‐36 Bodily Pain subscale scores were assessed. The results indicate a VAS score reduction of 3.0 and a change in SF‐36 physical function of 20 and mean change in SF‐36 bodily pain of 17. Nineteen percent of the 62 patients did not show improvement on any scale. There are significant problems with this study in that there are no controls and no randomization, no reasonable alternatives to heat lesioning the disc was offered as the patient was given the only alternative of interbody fusion surgery. The materials and methods describe the practice as 1,116 patients with chronic low back pain referred to the authors. This must be an unbelievably unique practice as anybody that works with chronic patients would find it almost impossible to have patients with chronic low back pain with no leg pain. It is the rule rather than the exception that patients come to us with back and leg pain. Discogenic pain can give rise to back spasm. The pathways for discogenic stimulation leading to paraspinal spasm have been beautifully outlined by Indahl. Injury to the disc can lead to leaking of disc material causing epidural scar formation involving the sinovertebral system nerves and nerve root or nerve roots. Simultaneously, there may be facet involvement and back spasm originating from the same process. The pathway for discogenic back spasm as suggested by Indahl is likely from the lateral branch of the posterior primary ramus and can also be interrupted by diagnostic nerve block followed by radiofrequency thermocoagulation. The patients in this study supposedly have failed all therapeutic modalities, yet, there is absolutely no mention of caudal lysis of adhesions or transforaminal lysis of adhesions and/or diagnostic and radiofrequency thermocoagulation of the pathways for discogenic back spasm. In our clinical experience, it is extremely rare where patients described in this series would have exclusive solitary disc problem necessitating electro‐thermo‐lesioning of the disc. We certainly find that a great deal of the problem is located in the spinal canal rather than exclusively in the disc or facets. Freeing up the ventral and lateral epidural space by the lysis of adhesions technique, followed by addressing the sino vertebral nerve and facet joint innervation can lead to excellent pain relief for 5 years or longer when the problem is looked at in a nonrandomized, noncontrolled study environment. Furthermore, the pain relief is prompt and does not necessitate the rather elaborate precautions outlined in this paper that clearly are different than the conservative therapy offered to these patients prior to disc lesioning. In the very rare instance, where clearly there is no spinal canal pathology and there is no facet and discogenic back spasm, we do believe an appropriately carried out discogram with monitoring of facial expressions and pressure recordings had resulted in clear rapid response pain relief. I just find a great deal of difficulty in understanding the physiological process of burning the structures within the disc that can take months to lead to pain relief. The rational expectation is that if you thermocoagulate a nerve that is involved in propagating pain, that you should have prompt and lasting pain relief until those nerves or pain pathways regenerate. Clearly, one needs to clarify the issues involved in exposing patients to discitis and osteomyelitis by interventional lesioning with no clear‐cut evidence of reasonable results. The studies need to be carried out with appropriate controls and randomization. Our clinical experience with intradiscal electrothermal treatment comes from two sources. One source is patients who have had the treatment elsewhere and failed to respond and the second source is where we have ruled out any other explanation for the patient's back pain and the patient responds to diagnostic and therapeutic disc procedures, but more commonly without a favorable outcome. These patients then are offered the option of various neuromodulation pain relieving procedures rather than interbody fusion surgery. Richard North has rather convincingly shown documented evidence that spinal cord stimulation gives better outcome than back surgery.     

抗癫痫药物治疗神经病理性疼痛的对照研究

目的:通过对腰椎间盘突出症患者硬膜外注射糖皮质激素疗效的回顾性分析,探讨硬膜外注射对腰椎间盘突出症的短期和中远期疗效。方法:收集我院2008年~2009年62例腰椎间盘突出症并伴有下肢疼痛患者行硬膜外注射糖皮质激素的临床资料。完整随访44例,进行治疗后1天、1月和6月疗效随访调查,并行疗效评价分析。结果:硬膜外注射糖皮质激素后1天、1月视觉模拟评分(visual ananlogue scale,VAS)及Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)与治疗前相比显著性降低(P<0.05),患者治疗后6个月VAS及ODI与治疗前相比无显著性差异(P>0.05)。VAS和ODI治疗后6个月与治疗后1个月相比,显著升高。结论:硬膜外注射糖皮质激素对椎间盘突出症有较好的短期(治疗后1天和1月)临床疗效,中长期(治疗后6月)疗效欠佳,建议与其他微创治疗方法联合使用。     

DMS配合Mckenzie疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效观察

目的:观察深部肌肉刺激仪(DMS)配合Mckenzie疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症伴有下肢痛患者的临床治疗效果。方法:选取符合纳入标准的60例腰椎间盘突出症患者按随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组各30例。2组患者均给予常规康复理疗及Mckenzie手法治疗,观察组在此基础上应用DMS进行配合治疗,分别于治疗前后采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和下腰痛评定表(JOA)以及临床疗效评定患者。结果:治疗4个疗程后,2组患者VAS评分较治疗前明显降低(P0.01),且观察组评分更低于对照组(P0.01);2组患者JOA评分较治疗前明显提高(P0.05),且观察组评分更高于对照组(P0.05)。2组临床疗效比较,观察组疗效明显优于对照组(P0.05)。结论:DMS配合Mckenzie疗法可以明显改善腰椎间盘突出伴有下肢痛患者的症状,加速患者症状好转,提高患者生活质量,值得在临床医疗中推广使用。     

Disc-FX系统经皮椎间盘切除、射频消融术治疗椎间盘源性腰痛的临床研究

目的:观察Disc-FX系统经皮椎间盘摘除、射频消融术治疗椎间盘源性腰痛的近期疗效.方法:选择自2010年7月至2010年10月在我院应用Disc-FX系统经皮髓核摘除、射频消融术治疗椎间盘源性腰痛并且随访资料完整的患者36例,比较术前、术后即刻、l周、3月、6月JOA、VAS及Oswestry(2.0版本)评分.结果:36例患者术后JOA评分较术前明显升高,术后VAS和Oswestry评分较术前明显降低,有统计学意义(P＜0.01).结论:Disc-FX系统经皮椎间盘切除、射频消融术是治疗椎间盘源性腰痛的有效方法.