Hepatitis E,what’s the real issue?

Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) infection is a worldwide disease and the primary cause of acute viral hepatitis in the world with an estimated 20 million cases every year and 70 000 deaths. Hepatitis E is a waterborne infection in the developing countries. In these countries, HEV genotypes 1 and 2 cause large outbreaks and affect young subjects, resulting in significant mortality in pregnant women and patients with cirrhosis. In the developed countries, HEV genotypes 3 and 4 are responsible for autochthonous, sporadic hepatitis and transmission is zoonotic. Parenteral transmission by the transfusion of blood products has been identified as a potential new mode of transmission. The prevalence of positive HEV viraemia in blood donors in Europe ranges from 1/600 to 1/2500 in highly endemic European countries. HEV can cause neurological disorders and chronic infections in immunocompromised patients. The progression of acute hepatitis E is usually asymptomatic and resolves spontaneously. Diagnostic tools include anti‐HEV IgM antibodies in serum and/or viral RNA detection in the blood or the stools by PCR. Ribavirin is used to treat chronic infection. A vaccine has been developed in China.     

Hepatitis E virus as an etiology of acute exacerbation of previously unrecognized asymptomatic patients with hepatitis B virus-related chronic liver disease

Background and Aim: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) has recently been implicated in episodes of acute decompensation in patients having underlying chronic liver disease (CLD) of varying etiology. However, HEV as a cause of acute exacerbation of previously asymptomatic and unrecognized hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐infected patients is less well described. The aim of the present study was to investigate the etiology of acute exacerbation of previously asymptomatic and unrecognized HBV‐infected patients and to evaluate the relative role of HEV. We also investigated the effect of superinfection on the clinical spectrum of underlying HBV infection. Methods: Forty‐three patients presented with the following were retrospectively analyzed: (i) clinical features suggestive of acute hepatitis; (ii) with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) (+); (iii) IgM hepatitis B core antibody (IgM anti‐HBc) (?); (iv) no previous history of liver disease; (v) no features suggestive of CLD at presentation; (vi) HBsAg remaining (+) for at least 12 months on follow up; and (vii) having a follow‐up biopsy during the convalescent phase showing evidence of chronic hepatitis B. Results: Of the 43 patients, 21 were hepatitis e antigen (HBeAg) (+) (Gr.1) and 22 HBeAg (?) (Gr.2) at presentation. In Gr.1, only two (9.5%) had superinfection (both with hepatitis A virus), whereas in Gr.2, 11 (50%) had superinfection (27.3% hepatitis E, 13.6% hepatitis A and 9.1% both) (P = 0.007). In Gr.1, the remaining 19 (90.5%) patients had spontaneous exacerbation (immune clearance with spontaneous seroconversion) whereas in Gr.2, the remaining 11 (50%) had spontaneous exacerbation (due to reactivation). Overall, HEV superinfection contributed to 20% of acute exacerbation episodes and, in particular, 36% of episodes in initially HBeAg (?) patients. Time to alanine aminotransferase normalization was longer in patients with superinfection (n = 13) as compared to spontaneous exacerbation (n = 30) (median [range] 36 [8–48]vs 16 [6–36] weeks, P = 0.001). During convalescence, there was no significant difference between histological activity index score (median [range] 8 [4–11]vs 8 [4–16] weeks, P = 0.629) and fibrosis scores (median [range] 3.5 [1–4]vs 2 [1–4] weeks, P = 0.099] on liver biopsy after recovery among patients with acute exacerbation due to superinfection and spontaneous exacerbation. Conclusions: Acute exacerbations in HBeAg (+) patients are most often due to spontaneous viral activation, while in HBeAg (?) patients, superinfection with non‐B hepatitis viruses and spontaneous viral activation are equally common. HEV is an important cause of acute exacerbation in previously asymptomatic and unrecognized patients with HBV‐related CLD.     

庚型肝炎临床和病理特征

目的探讨庚型肝炎（ＨＧ）临床和病理特征。方法采用逆转录聚合酶链反应（ＲＴ－ＰＣＲ）检测血清ＨＧＶＲＮＡ；用庚型肝炎病毒（ＨＧＶ）ＮＳ５区抗原制备单克隆抗体（ＭｃＡｂ），对２２例临床和／或病理确诊的急、慢性庚型肝炎进行肝脏免疫组化。结果ＨＧＶ感染的血清学模式以重叠ＨＢＶ，ＨＣＶ，ＨＡＶ或ＨＥＶ二重感染为主，占６３．６％（１４／２２），单独ＨＧＶ感染者占３６．４％（８／２２）；ＨＧＶ在肝脏内分布呈散在胞浆型。结论ＨＧＶ单独感染者临床多呈隐匿性发病，症状轻，慢性化程度高     

Investigation of an epidemic of Hepatitis E in Nellore in south India

Objective To determine the incidence of acute hepatitis because of hepatitis E virus (HEV) and the source of the epidemic in Nellore in south India in 2008. Methods Anti‐HEV IgM ELISA and RT‐PCR for HEV‐RNA were carried out on blood and stool samples from patients with acute hepatitis presenting to different hospitals in the city. The city was divided into 33 clusters, and 20 families from each cluster were systematically interviewed to determine the incidence of hepatitis E in the city. The survey was conducted on 2685 residents of 673 households from 24th November to 4th December 2008. Results The overall incidence of hepatitis was 5.7% (152/2685), i.e. an estimated 23 915 persons in the city were affected. There were two deaths because of acute hepatitis in the population surveyed translating to an estimated 315 deaths. Men had higher attack rates than women (7.8%vs. 3.5%) and young adults compared to children under 5 years (6.9%vs. 2.9%). Families drinking water from the pumping station at Bujjamarevu had the highest attack rate of 54.5% (39.8–69.2%). HEV IgM antibodies were present in 80/100 plasma samples tested. HEV‐RNA was detected in 43/100 individuals tested, and isolates were characterized as genotype 1 by sequencing. Conclusion Sewage draining into the river close to the pumping stations and broken pipelines crossing sewage drains may have triggered this large outbreak.     

Relevance of chronic hepatitis E in liver transplant recipients: a real‐life setting

The chronic course of hepatitis E virus (HEV) infections in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients has been described previously, but prospectively collected data are rare. We aimed to study the role of chronic hepatitis E in OLT in a real‐life setting. Therefore, 287 adult OLT recipients (169 male [59%], median age 56 years) were prospectively tested by HEV polymerase chain reaction assay (lower level of detection = 10 IU/mL), irrespective of their level of liver enzymes. In 4 patients (1.4%), chronic HEV infection was diagnosed. All 4 patients were male, and their age (median 48.5 years), the time since transplantation (median 45.5 months), and bilirubin level (median 0.6 mg/dL) did not differ significantly from the total cohort. However, alanine transaminase and aspartame transaminase levels were significantly higher in HEV‐infected patients (75–646 U/L, median 216 U/L and 68–317 U/L, median 108 U/L) than in non‐infected patients (6–617 U/L, median 41 and 6–355 U/L, median 36; P = 0.004 and 0.040, Mann–Whitney test). In 3 patients, liver biopsy was performed and revealed signs of inflammation and chronic liver disease, as enlarged densely infiltrated portal tracts with mild‐to‐moderate interface hepatitis. All infected patients were treated with ribavirin with the starting dose adjusted to renal function (400–800 mg/day). In 2 patients, dose reduction was necessary. Transaminases normalized in all 4 patients, and all patients cleared their infection within 3 months of ribavirin treatment. However, 1 patient experienced viral relapse 12 weeks after discontinuation. Ribavirin medication was re‐started and viral clearance occurred within 8 weeks and persisted. Sequence analysis of the HEV genome of this patient revealed that he was infected with an HEV variant, which recently has been shown to have a reduced response to ribavirin in cell culture. The risk of chronic HEV infections in OLT recipients in low‐endemic countries should not be overestimated. No case of chronic hepatitis E was observed in patients with normal liver enzymes, indicating that general screening of all OLT recipients is not necessary. However, if chronic hepatitis E develops, it can be treated efficiently with ribavirin.     

Risk factors for vertical transmission of hepatitis E virus infection

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection can be vertically transmitted, but the factors that transmit the disease to foetuses are still unclear. We studied a total of 144 pregnant women with HEV infection. Cord blood and newborn samples were taken for analysis. Nutritional factors were evaluated on the basis of anthropometric parameters and biochemical factors, and HEV viral load was quantified by real‐time PCR. Sequencing of HEV‐positive samples was performed. Approximately 14.63% (6/41) of pregnant patients with acute liver failure (ALF) died before delivery. Vertical transmission was observed in 46.09% (59/128) of HEV‐IgM‐positive mothers. Approximately 23.80% (10/42) of newborns in the acute viral hepatitis group and 29.41% (5/17) in the ALF group were positive for HEV‐RNA. No significant difference was observed in the occurrence of vertical transmission in HEV groups. Viral load was found to be a significant predictor for vertical transmission of HEV infection adjusted with haemoglobin and folate in derivation cohort group. Incorporating these variables, a new score predicting vertical transmission of HEV was derived. Using these significant predictors, the probability for vertical transmission of HEV was well stratified in the validation group (P>.05). In conclusion, viral load was associated with vertical transmission of HEV infection. A valid prediction score model was generated that was verified in a validation cohort group.     

Unexpected long‐lasting anti‐HEV IgM positivity: Is HEV antigen a better serological marker for hepatitis E infection diagnosis?

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is the leading cause of acute hepatitis worldwide. The minimum criterion for diagnosis of acute infection is detection of anti‐HEV antibodies, although there are scant data on IgM duration. Our aim was to assess the persistence of HEV markers after acute self‐limited hepatitis E. HEV serological tests (IgM by Mikrogen and Wantai and HEV‐Ag) and HEV RNA were carried out in two cohorts: (a) patients with prior acute hepatitis E (ALT >10 x ULN plus positive IgM ± HEV RNA) currently self‐limited and (b) 50 blood donors with positive HEV RNA. Among 25 cases of prior acute hepatitis E, after a median follow‐up of 34 months, all presented undetectable HEV RNA. However, anti‐HEV IgM remained detectable in 14 (56%) by Mikrogen, 6 (24%) by Wantai and none for HEV‐Ag. Anti‐HEV IgM tested positive in 80%‐100% within the second year and 17%‐42% over 3 years later, by Wantai and Mikrogen, respectively. Among HEV RNA‐positive donors, 12 (25%) tested positive for either IgM by Mikrogen or Wantai, 9 (18%) for both and 18 (36%) for HEV‐Ag. HEV‐Ag positivity was more likely as HEV RNA was higher (14% if <2.2 log IU/mL; 64% if RNA ≥ 3.7). Overall, HEV‐Ag performed best, with a positive predictive value of 100% and diagnostic accuracy of 57%. Anti‐HEV IgM exhibited unexpectedly long persistence after a self‐limited acute hepatitis E. HEV‐Ag had the best performance and could be especially useful in settings where HEV RNA is not available.     

Hepatitis E superinfection produces severe decompensation in patients with chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The adverse effect of acute hepatitis A in chronic liver disease is well known. The outcome of acute hepatitis E in chronic liver disease has not been extensively studied. The present study aimed to examine the clinical profile and outcome of patients with chronic liver disease and hepatitis E virus (HEV) superinfection, and the seroprevalence of hepatitis A and E infections in patients with chronic liver disease and controls in India. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients with chronic liver disease and acute icteric hepatitis E was performed. Acute hepatitis E was diagnosed by immunoglobulin (Ig)M ELISA. Seroprevalence studies were carried out using IgG ELISA in 100 patients with chronic liver disease and 79 age- and sex-matched controls. RESULTS: From June 2001 to December 2002, nine patients with chronic liver disease were found to have superinfection with HEV. Out of these, six patients died of advanced liver failure. The etiology of liver disease was Wilson's disease in six, hepatitis B virus in one, autoimmune in one and cryptogenic in one case. The seroprevalence of hepatitis A was 99 and 100% and 56 and 21% for HEV in cases and controls, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Acute HEV in patients with chronic liver disease has a grave prognosis. Wilson's disease was the most common cause of chronic liver disease complicated by acute HEV. Seroprevalence studies showed that 44% of patients with chronic liver disease were at risk of developing hepatitis E. Hepatitis E vaccine, when available, is indicated for use in this group.     

Lack of evidence of hepatitis E virus infection among renal transplant recipients in a disease‐endemic area

Persistent hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection has been reported among solid‐organ transplant recipients in nonendemic areas. Such chronic infections have all been related to genotype 3 HEV, which is prevalent in these areas. Whether persistent infection occurs with genotype 1 HEV, prevalent in areas where the infection is hyperendemic, is unclear. We therefore tested sera from renal transplant recipients receiving immunosuppressive agents in India, where genotype 1 HEV infection is endemic, for alanine aminotransferase levels, and presence of IgM and IgG anti‐HEV antibodies and HEV RNA. Of the 205 subjects studied [aged 16–65 (median, 38) years, 182 male], 46 (22.4%) had abnormal ALT levels (>40 IU/mL). IgG anti‐HEV was detected in 52 (20.5%) and IgM anti‐HEV was detected in 14 (6.8%) subjects, including four who had IgG anti‐HEV; antibody positivity had no relation with serum ALT or serum creatinine. All the sera tested were negative for HEV RNA. These findings suggest that chronic infection with genotype 1 HEV is infrequent.     

Viral RNA but no evidence of replication can be detected in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of hepatitis E virus–infected patients

Summary. Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is an important cause of acute viral hepatitis in several developing countries but has recently been shown to cause chronic hepatitis in immunosuppressed persons. Other hepatotropic viruses that cause chronic infection have been shown to infect peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and to persist in those cells. We therefore decided to look for evidence of replication of HEV in PBMCs obtained from patients with acute hepatitis E, using strand‐specific assays for positive and negative HEV RNA. Of the 44 patients with acute hepatitis E during an outbreak in India, including 27 with detectable IgM anti‐HEV and 19 with detectable serum HEV RNA, 11 had detectable HEV RNA in their PBMCs. However, of the six PBMC specimens with strong HEV RNA signal, none had detectable negative‐strand HEV RNA, a marker of viral replication. These findings indicate the presence of HEV RNA but the absence of its replication in PBMCs from patients with acute hepatitis E.     

Acute hepatitis E virus infection causing acute liver failure requiring living‐donor liver transplantation in a non‐pregnant immunocompetent woman

We report a rare case of acute liver failure from acute hepatitis E virus (HEV) in a non‐pregnant woman without comorbidities who survived after liver transplantation. The source was likely consumption of partially cooked pig liver. HEV genotype 3 is the second most common genotype causing acute hepatitis E in developed countries. Fulminant hepatitis E rarely occurs without a risk factor, as in our patient. Vigilant monitoring for chronic hepatitis E in post‐transplant immunocompromised patients is needed.     

Role of nitric oxide synthase genes in hepatitis E virus infection

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is the most common cause of endemic and epidemic acute hepatitis. A correlation between iNOS, eNOS polymorphisms, levels and severity of disease has been reported, and here, we examined the role of iNOS and eNOS gene polymorphisms and their levels in HEV‐related acute viral hepatitis and acute liver failure. Hepatitis E virus‐related cases of acute hepatitis (294 patients) and liver failure (82 patients) and age‐ and sex‐matched healthy controls (331 subjects) were included in the study. PCR‐RFLP was performed to identify the polymorphisms in the iNOS and eNOS genes. iNOS and eNOS levels were studied using ELISA assays and HEV viral load, genotype and combined effects of iNOS genotype, levels and parameters for disease severity were examined. The frequency of iNOS (CT + TT) and eNOS (GT + TT) genotypes was higher in subjects with liver failure compared with controls. iNOS and eNOS levels in patients with acute liver failure (55.51 ± 6.33 IU/mL, 60.2 ± 3.69) cases were significantly increased as compared to patients with acute viral hepatitis (17.8 ± 6.08 IU/mL, 23.7 ± 6.57) and controls (P < 0.05). A significant positive correlation was observed between the iNOS and eNOS levels in our study population when compared with the severity of disease parameters. Hence, the iNOS C150T polymorphism and the eNOS G894T polymorphism and high levels of iNOS and eNOS are associated with an increased risk of HEV‐related acute hepatitis and liver failure. This study supports the possible role of nitric oxide synthase genes (iNOS and eNOS) in determining the severity of HEV infection.     

Hepatitis E infection in HIV‐infected liver and kidney transplant candidates

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) has been reported to cause acute and chronic hepatitis in those with HIV infection and among solid organ transplant recipients in Europe. Limited data indicate that HEV is endemic in the United States, but the prevalence and significance of HEV infection among those with HIV and awaiting solid organ transplantation is unknown. We evaluated anti‐HEV IgM and IgG antibodies and HEV RNA in 166 HIV‐infected solid organ transplant candidates enrolled in the NIH HIV‐Transplant Cohort. Overall prevalence of anti‐HEV IgG approached 20% in both liver and renal transplant candidates. Evidence of recent infection was present in approximately 2% of liver transplant candidates and none of the kidney transplant candidates. HEV RNA was not detected in any patient. We conclude that markers of HEV infection are frequent among candidates for transplantation, but active, ongoing viremia is not seen. Evidence of recent infection (acute on chronic) liver disease was present in liver but not kidney recipients.     

Clinical features and determinants of chronicity in hepatitis E virus infection

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) has traditionally been associated with an acute, self‐limiting hepatitis and is not known to have any chronic sequelae. HEV genotypes 1 and 2, which are human pathogens, have been associated with this self‐limiting presentation, in both sporadic and epidemic settings. HEV genotype 3, which is zoonotically transmitted, is increasingly being reported as a cause of chronic infection in immunocompromised patients. These include patients with solid organ transplants, patients receiving chemotherapy for haematologic malignancies and patients infected with HIV. Chronic infection is associated with rapidly progressing liver disease and extrahepatic manifestations including neurologic disorders. We review the clinical manifestations of chronic HEV infection and discuss factors determining persistence and chronicity of HEV.     

Autoimmune liver disease in children

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Autoimmune liver disease (AILD) in children progresses to cirrhosis and liver failure if not diagnosed and managed in time. We prospectively analyzed our patients with liver disease for autoimmune etiology and their outcome with treatment. METHODS: All patients with liver disease were evaluated with liver function tests, abdominal ultrasonography, endoscopy, liver biopsy, viral markers and investigations for Wilson's disease. Immunoglobin (Ig)M hepatitis A virus, hepatitis E virus (HEV) and IgM hepatitis B core antibody were tested if acute viral hepatitis was suspected. Antinuclear antibody (ANA), antismooth muscle antibody (SMA), and liver kidney microsomal antibody (anti-LKM-1) were done in all cases. Autoimmune liver disease was diagnosed when one or more autoantibodies tested positive (> 1:40), and no other etiology of liver disease was identified. We also applied criteria proposed by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. Cases diagnosed to have AILD were treated with immunosuppressive drugs. RESULTS: Autoimmune liver disease constituted 3.9% (6/153; median age and duration of illness 8.5 years and 3 months, respectively) of chronic liver disease cases. Four patients had acute hepatitis-like presentation. Of the six cases, two each were ANA and SMA +; one was anti-LKM-1 +, and the other was positive for both SMA and anti-LKM-1. Three of the patients achieved remission with combination therapy of oral prednisolone (OP) and azathioprine (AZT), and one with only OP. The other two patients were not treated. Two of the patients in remission have been weaned off from immunosuppressive therapy, and one is in a withdrawal phase. Another patient, while in biochemical remission developed superimposed anicteric acute HEV infection. CONCLUSION: Although AILD is uncommon in children, its search is rewarding, as remission is achieved with immunosuppressive therapy. Superimposed acute viral hepatitis can occur in endemic areas.     

Analysis of serum α‐fetoprotein concentration in patients with viral hepatitis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate serum α‐fetoprotein (AFP) concentrations in patients with viral hepatitis. METHODS: Serum concentrations of total bilirubin (TB), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate amino­transferase (AST), albumin, globulin, AFP and viral markers were determined in 310 patients with pathologically proven viral hepatitis. The relation between the concentration of AFP and clinical manifestation, pathology, family history of liver malignant disease and virus type was studied. RESULTS: Serum AFP concentrations were elevated in 115 of the 310 patients (37.1%). According to the pathological diagnosis, the lowest positive rate of AFP was in acute hepatitis (11.7%), the highest was in chronic severe hepatitis (66.7%), the second highest in liver cirrhosis (57.5%), and chronic hepatitis was intermediate (34.2%). If the diagnosis was based on the clinical manifestation, the highest positive rate was found in chronic severe hepatitis, the lowest in chronic hepatitis, and acute hepatitis was intermediate. The positive rate of serum AFP by virus type was 35.5% for hepatitis B (HBV), superinfected with HAV or with HEV was 62.8%, and with HCV was 27.3%. Only one in six patients with HCV infection and none with simple HAV or HEV infection were positive for AFP. In patients with a family history of liver cancer, the positive rate of AFP was higher than in those without such a history (57.9%vs 38.2%; P = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that AFP positivity is not uncommon in patients with viral hepatitis and if the patient has an elevated concentration, it is highly likely to be HBV infection or HBV super­infected with HAV or HEV.     

Icteric acute hepatitis E with no response of immunoglobulin M class anti‐hepatitis E virus antibody

A 68‐year‐old Japanese man developed icteric acute hepatitis during periodic care after undergoing gastrectomy due to early gastric cancer. The routine serological markers for hepatitis A, B and C viruses were all negative. Although the liver enzymes spontaneously recovered without any specific therapy, cholestasis was relatively prolonged and successfully treated with prednisolone. Determination of serum hepatitis E virus (HEV) RNA revealed the transient infection of HEV, and both immunoglobulin (Ig)A and IgG class anti‐HEV antibodies were detected after the disease onset, whereas those were negative when measured 3 weeks prior to the onset. In addition, the titer of serum IgA class antibody was associated with the clinical signs of hepatitis. In contrast, no IgM class antibody was detected throughout the course. This case suggests that screening only with IgM class antibody is not sufficient to detect acute HEV infection.