共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Kirk JK Grzywacz JG Arcury TA Ip EH Nguyen HT Bell RA Saldana S Quandt SA 《Journal of general internal medicine》2012,27(5):534-540
BACKGROUND
Knowing a patient’s health literacy can help clinicians and researchers anticipate a patient’s ability to understand complex health regimens and deliver better patient-centered instructions and information. Poor health literacy has been linked with lower ability to function adequately in health care systems.OBJECTIVE
We evaluated and compared three measures of health literacy and performance among older patients with diabetes.DESIGN
Cross-sectional study utilizing in-person interviews conducted in participants’ homes.PARTICIPANTS
A tri-ethnic sample (MAIN MEASURE
Participants completed interviews and health literacy assessments using the Short-Form Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA), the Rapid Estimates of Adult Literacy in Medicine Short-Form (REALM-SF), or the Newest Vital Signs (NVS). Scores for reading comprehension and numeracy were calculated.RESULTS
Over 90% completed the S-TOFHLA numeracy and approximately 85% completed the S-TOFHLA reading and REALM-SF. Only 73% completed the NVS. The correlation of S-TOFHLA total scores with REALM-SF and NVS were 0.48 and 0.54, respectively. Age, gender, ethnic, educational and income differences in health literacy emerged for several instruments, but the pattern of results across the instruments was highly variable.CONCLUSIONS
A large segment of older adults is unable to complete short-form assessments of health literacy. Among those who were able to complete assessments, the REALM-SF and NVS performed comparably, but their relatively low convergence with the S-TOFHLA raises questions about instrument selection when studying health literacy of older adults.2.
Background
Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is an increasingly well-recognized measure of health outcome in cardiology. We examined HRQL as a predictor of unplanned rehospitalization for cardiac reasons in patients after coronary revascularization over a period of 3 years.Patients and methods
Out of 791 patients enrolled in the study, 743 completed the MacNew HRQL questionnaire after coronary revascularization. MacNew HRQL scores were used as predictors of unplanned rehospitalization.Results
Within the 3-year follow-up period, 125 patients (16.8?%) were rehospitalized. After adjustment for age, gender, and myocardial infarction as the initiating event, there were significant differences in unplanned rehospitalization rates between patients with low or moderate vs. high MacNew HRQL global scores (HR: 1.8, 95?% CI: 1.2–2.7) and both physical (HR: 2.2, 95?% CI: 1.4–3.5) and social (HR: 1.8, 95?% CI: 1.2–2.7) subscale scores.Conclusion
Poor HRQL assessed after coronary revascularization appears to be a powerful predictor of rehospitalization over a 3-year period.3.
Linda B. Piller Lara M. Simpson Sarah Baraniuk Gabriel B. Habib Mahboob Rahman Jan N. Basile Richard A. Dart Allan J. Ellsworth Herbert Fendley Jeffrey L. Probstfield Paul K. Whelton Barry R. Davis for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group 《Journal of general internal medicine》2014,29(11):1475-1483
Background
Hypertension is a major risk factor for peripheral artery disease (PAD). Little is known about relative efficacy of antihypertensive treatments for preventing PAD.Objectives
To compare, by randomized treatment groups, hospitalized or revascularized PAD rates and subsequent morbidity and mortality among participants in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lower Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).Design
Randomized, double-blind, active-control trial in high-risk hypertensive participants.Participants
Eight hundred thirty participants with specified secondary outcome of lower extremity PAD events during the randomized phase of ALLHAT.Interventions/events
In-trial PAD events were reported during ALLHAT (1994–2002). Post-trial mortality data through 2006 were obtained from administrative databases. Mean follow-up was 8.8 years.Main Measures
Baseline characteristics and intermediate outcomes in three treatment groups, using the Kaplan-Meier method to calculate cumulative event rates and post-PAD mortality rates, Cox proportional hazards regression model for hazard ratios and 95 % confidence intervals, and multivariate Cox regression models to examine risk differences among treatment groups.Key Results
Following adjustment for baseline characteristics, neither participants assigned to the calcium-channel antagonist amlodipine nor to the ACE-inhibitor lisinopril showed a difference in risk of clinically advanced PAD compared with those in the chlorthalidone arm (HR, 0.86; 95 % CI, 0.72–1.03 and HR, 0.98; 95 % CI, 0.83–1.17, respectively). Of the 830 participants with in-trial PAD events, 63 % died compared to 34 % of those without PAD; there were no significant treatment group differences for subsequent nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularizations, strokes, heart failure, or mortality.Conclusions
Neither amlodipine nor lisinopril showed superiority over chlorthalidone in reducing clinically advanced PAD risk. These findings reinforce the compelling need for comparative outcome trials examining treatment of PAD in high-risk hypertensive patients. Once PAD develops, cardiovascular event and mortality risk is high, regardless of type of antihypertensive treatment.4.
James S. Goodwin Kristin Sheffield Shuang Li Alai Tan 《Journal of general internal medicine》2016,31(11):1308-1314
Background
Obtaining cancer screening on patients with limited life expectancy has been proposed as a measure for low quality care for primary care physicians (PCPs). However, administrative data may underestimate life expectancy in patients who undergo screening.Objective
To determine the association between receipt of screening mammography or PSA and overall survival.Design
Retrospective cohort study from 1/1/1999 to 12/31/2012. Receipt of screening was assessed for 2001–2002 and survival from 1/1/2003 to 12/31/2012. Life expectancy was estimated as of 1/1/03 using a validated algorithm, and was compared to actual survival for men and women, stratified by receipt of cancer screening.Participants
A 5 % sample of Medicare beneficiaries aged 69–90 years as of 1/1/2003 (n?=?906,723).Interventions
Receipt of screening mammography in 2001–2002 for women, or a screening PSA test in 2002 for men.Main Measures
Survival from 1/1/2003 through 12/31/2012.Key Results
Subjects were stratified by life expectancy based on age and comorbidity. Within each stratum, the subjects with prior cancer screening had actual median survivals higher than those who were not screened, with differences ranging from 1.7 to 2.1 years for women and 0.9 to 1.1 years for men. In a Cox model, non-receipt of screening in women had an impact on survival (HR?=?1.52; 95 % CI?=?1.51, 1.54) similar in magnitude to a diagnosis of complicated diabetes or heart failure, and was comparable to uncomplicated diabetes or liver disease in men (HR?=?1.23; 1.22, 1.25).Conclusions
Receipt of cancer screening is a powerful marker of health status that is not captured by comorbidity measures in administrative data. Because life expectancy algorithms using administrative data underestimate the life expectancy of patients who undergo screening, they can overestimate the problem of cancer screening in patients with limited life expectancy.5.
Background
Heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) have been established in the last few years as a non-invasive method for recording the demands on the cardiovascular system. The development enables us today to measure the interbeat intervals with different technologies for calculating HR and HRV.Materials and methods
This review is based on a systematic literature search in PubMed for validity of different measurement techniques and their pros and cons for the measurement of HR and the analysis of HRV.Results
Measurement equipment for recording of interbeat intervals should have a high storage capacity and a sampling rate of 1000 Hz ideally. The quality criteria of freedom of feedback (small, little disruptive), robustness and a non-invasive measurement (e. g. freeze-electrodes or sensors) have to be fulfilled. In addition to the Holter ECG, several portable heart rate watch and chest belt systems provide adequate validity and good applicability.Discussion
The Holter ECG is still the gold standard for the measurement of NN intervals and for the analysis of HRV. Modern heart rate watches show a good correlation with the conformance of freedom from discomfort, robustness and non-invasive measurement and are a good alternative due to the lower disturbance of test persons.6.
Background
Little is known about self-help associations and their possibilities. Obstacles often prevent early contacts between affected people.Objectives
The psychosocial support given by self-help associations in different phases is evaluated.Materials and methods
Based on the experience of the Deutsche ILCO and from cooperation with other organizations and institutions, various dimensions of self-help groups are investigated.Results
On the professional side, there is a lack of knowledge and of attitude. Suitable structures are rare.Conclusions
The removal of barriers and development of effective structures are overdue.7.
8.
Liliana E. Pezzin Mallory B. O’Niel Ann B. Nattinger 《Journal of general internal medicine》2009,24(2):446
RATIONALE
Adjuvant hormone therapy (HT) based on tamoxifen (TX) or aromatase inhibitors (AIs) has become the standard of care for treating hormone receptor -positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) over the past 20 years. Based on clinical trial results, AI use is recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology for treatment of postmenopausal women with HR+ breast cancer. AIs, however, are significantly more expensive than TX, raising concerns about access and use of effective treatment among women of lower socio-economic status.OBJECTIVES
To examine the relationship between adjuvant HT modality and experience of financial hardship among a cohort of older BC survivors. Also, to examine the extent to which financial concerns affect the probability of switching between adjuvant HT modalities.DESIGN
Population-based, prospective survey study.PARTICIPANTS
Elderly (65+) women who had an incident BC surgery in 2003 and who reported receiving adjuvant HT during the first 12 months post-surgery.METHODS
Multivariate regression models.RESULTS
Use of AIs was associated with a significantly higher probability of financial hardship. Women who had taken only an AI were more likely to experience financial difficulty than women who took only TX (OR?=?1.4; 95% CI: 1.1–1.7), but women who switched between TX and AI were not more likely to experience financial difficulty. Breast cancer survivors with no drug coverage (OR?=?4.5; 95% CI: 3.3–5.9) or partial drug coverage (OR?=?3.6; 95% CI: 2.8–4.5) were more likely to experience financial difficulty compared to those with full coverage. Lack of drug coverage was also the main factor associated with the likelihood that BC survivors did not switch adjuvant HT modalities.CONCLUSIONS
Adjuvant HTs have important economic consequences for BC survivors. These consequences are ameliorated by full, but not partial, drug coverage.9.
Giovanni B. Gaeta Massimo Puoti Nicola Coppola Teresa Santantonio Raffaele Bruno Antonio Chirianni Massimo Galli 《Infection》2018,46(2):183-188
Aim
This paper is aimed at providing practical recommendations for the management of acute hepatitis C (AHC).Methods
This is an expert position paper based on the literature revision. Final recommendations were graded by level of evidence and strength of the recommendations.Results
Treatment of AHC with direct-acting antivirals (DAA) is safe and effective; it overcomes the limitations of INF-based treatments.Conclusions
Early treatment with DAA should be offered when available.10.
Purpose
To determine the predictive value of qSOFA (quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) in Malawian patients with suspected infection.Methods
Prospective observational study in a tertiary referral hospital in Malawi.Results
Predictive ability of qSOFA was reasonable [AUROC 0.73 (95% CI 0.68–0.78)], increasing to 0.77 (95% CI 0.72–0.82) when classifying all patients with altered mental status as high risk. Adding HIV status as a variable to the qSOFA score did not improve predictive value.Conclusion
qSOFA is a simple tool that can aid risk stratification in resource-limited settings.11.
Rebekah L. Gardner Rouba Youssef Blake Morphis Alyssa DaCunha Kimberly Pelland Emily Cooper 《Journal of general internal medicine》2018,33(11):1892-1898
Background
Physicians spend significant time outside of regular office visits caring for complex patients, and this work is often uncompensated. In 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced a billing code for care coordination between office visits for beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions.Objective
Characterize use of the Chronic Care Management (CCM) code in New England in 2015.Design
Retrospective observational analysis.Participants
All Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in New England continuously enrolled in Parts A and B in 2015.Intervention
None.Main measures
The primary outcome was the number of beneficiaries with a CCM claim per 1000 eligible beneficiaries. Secondary outcomes included the total number of CCM claims, total reimbursement, mean number of claims per beneficiary, and beneficiary characteristics independently associated with receiving CCM services.Key results
Of the more than two million Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in New England, almost 1.7 million were potentially eligible for CCM services. Among eligible beneficiaries, 10,951 (0.65%) had a CCM claim in 2015. Massachusetts had the highest penetration of CCM use (9.40 claims per 1000 eligible beneficiaries); Vermont had the lowest (0.54 claims per 1000 eligible beneficiaries). Mean reimbursement per physician was $1745.98. Age, race/ethnicity, dual-eligible status, income, number of chronic conditions, and state of residence were associated with receiving CCM services in an adjusted model.Conclusions
The CCM code is likely underutilized in New England; the program may therefore not be achieving its intended goal of encouraging consistent, team-based chronic care management for Medicare’s most complex beneficiaries. Or practices may be foregoing reimbursement for care coordination that they are already providing. Recently implemented revisions may improve uptake of CCM services; it will be important to compare our results with future utilization.12.
Background
Evidence is lacking to inform providers’ and patients’ decisions about many common treatment strategies for patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD).Methods/design
The DEcIDE Patient Outcomes in ESRD Study is funded by the United States (US) Agency for Health Care Research and Quality to study the comparative effectiveness of: 1) antihypertensive therapies, 2) early versus later initiation of dialysis, and 3) intravenous iron therapies on clinical outcomes in patients with ESRD. Ongoing studies utilize four existing, nationally representative cohorts of patients with ESRD, including (1) the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for ESRD study (1041 incident dialysis patients recruited from October 1995 to June 1999 with complete outcome ascertainment through 2009), (2) the Dialysis Clinic Inc (45,124 incident dialysis patients initiating and receiving their care from 2003–2010 with complete outcome ascertainment through 2010), (3) the United States Renal Data System (333,308 incident dialysis patients from 2006–2009 with complete outcome ascertainment through 2010), and (4) the Cleveland Clinic Foundation Chronic Kidney Disease Registry (53,399 patients with chronic kidney disease with outcome ascertainment from 2005 through 2009). We ascertain patient reported outcomes (i.e., health-related quality of life), morbidity, and mortality using clinical and administrative data, and data obtained from national death indices. We use advanced statistical methods (e.g., propensity scoring and marginal structural modeling) to account for potential biases of our study designs. All data are de-identified for analyses. The conduct of studies and dissemination of findings are guided by input from Stakeholders in the ESRD community.Discussion
The DEcIDE Patient Outcomes in ESRD Study will provide needed evidence regarding the effectiveness of common treatments employed for dialysis patients. Carefully planned dissemination strategies to the ESRD community will enhance studies’ impact on clinical care and patients’ outcomes.13.
J. Daryl Thornton Catherine Sullivan Jeffrey M. Albert Maria Cedeño Bridget Patrick Julie Pencak Kristine A. Wong Margaret D. Allen Linda Kimble Heather Mekesa Gordon Bowen Ashwini R. Sehgal 《Journal of general internal medicine》2016,31(8):832-839
BACKGROUND
Low organ donation rates remain a major barrier to organ transplantation.OBJECTIVE
We aimed to determine the effect of a video and patient cueing on organ donation consent among patients meeting with their primary care provider.DESIGN
This was a randomized controlled trial between February 2013 and May 2014.SETTING
The waiting rooms of 18 primary care clinics of a medical system in Cuyahoga County, Ohio.PATIENTS
The study included 915 patients over 15.5 years of age who had not previously consented to organ donation.INTERVENTIONS
Just prior to their clinical encounter, intervention patients (n?=?456) watched a 5-minute organ donation video on iPads and then choose a question regarding organ donation to ask their provider. Control patients (n?=?459) visited their provider per usual routine.MAIN MEASURES
The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who consented for organ donation. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients who discussed organ donation with their provider and the proportion who were satisfied with the time spent with their provider during the clinical encounter.KEY RESULTS
Intervention patients were more likely than control patients to consent to donate organs (22 % vs. 15 %, OR 1.50, 95%CI 1.10–2.13). Intervention patients were also more likely to have donation discussions with their provider (77 % vs. 18 %, OR 15.1, 95%CI 11.1–20.6). Intervention and control patients were similarly satisfied with the time they spent with their provider (83 % vs. 86 %, OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.61–1.25).LIMITATION
How the observed increases in organ donation consent might translate into a greater organ supply is unclear.CONCLUSION
Watching a brief video regarding organ donation and being cued to ask a primary care provider a question about donation resulted in more organ donation discussions and an increase in organ donation consent. Satisfaction with the time spent during the clinical encounter was not affected.TRIAL REGISTRATION
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT0169713714.
Erin?E.?Krebs Misti?Paudel Brent?C.?Taylor Douglas?C.?Bauer Howard?A.?Fink Nancy?E.?Lane Kristine?E.?Ensrud for the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study Research Group 《Journal of general internal medicine》2016,31(5):463-469
Background
Although older adults are disproportionately affected by painful musculoskeletal conditions and receive more opioid analgesics than persons in other age groups, insufficient evidence is available regarding opioid harms in this age group.Objective
To examine longitudinal relationships between opioid use and falls, clinical fractures, and changes in physical performance. We hypothesized that opioid use would be associated with greater risks of falling and incident clinical fractures and greater declines in physical performance.Design
We analyzed data from the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS), a large prospective longitudinal cohort study. Participants completed baseline visits from 2000 to 2002 and were followed for 9.1 (SD 4.0) years.Participants
MrOS enrolled 5994 community-dwelling men ≥ 65 years of age. The present study included 2902 participants with back, hip, or knee pain most or all of the time at baseline.Main Measures
The exposure of interest was opioid use, defined at each visit as participant-reported daily or near-daily use of any opioid-containing analgesic. Among patients, 309 (13.4 %) reported opioid use at one or more visits. Participants were queried every 4 months about falls and fractures. Physical performance scores were derived from tests of grip strength, chair stands, gait speed, and dynamic balance.Key Results
In the main analysis, the adjusted risk of falling did not differ significantly between opioid use and non-use groups (RR 1.10, 95 % CI 0.99, 1.24). Similarly, adjusted rates of incident clinical fracture did not differ between groups (HR 1.13, 95 % CI 0.94, 1.36). Physical performance was worse at baseline for the opioid use group, but annualized change in physical performance scores did not differ between groups (?0.022, 95 % CI ?0.138, 0.093).Conclusions
Additional research is needed to determine whether opioid use is a marker of risk or a cause of falls, fractures, and progressive impairment among older adults with persistent pain.15.
T. H. Lindner 《Der Diabetologe》2016,12(5):319-327
Incidence of diabetic kidney diseases
In some European countries the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has remained relatively constant or even fallen over the past years despite an increasing prevalence of chronic kidney diseases (CKD). This possibly indicates an improvement in long-term treatment; however, by 2015 a further increase in the prevalence of CKD is expected.Diagnostics
In the diagnostics, the micro-ribonucleic acids (μRNA) have reached the stage of clinical trials. Among the many other suggestions for new biomarkers urinary podocalyxin and angiotensinogen appear to show promise.Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blockade
On the subject of simple versus dual renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAAS) blockade important meta-analyses were published, that levelled the problems of hyperkalemia and acute renal failure for dual blockade. Surprisingly, in a new meta-analysis no single antihypertensive agent could effectively influence the overall mortality of diabetes patients with diabetic nephropathy. In particular, the onset of ESRD was significantly delayed by dual RAAS blockade.New substances: finerenone and patiromer
In a pilot study the new non-steroidal aldosterone antagonist finerenone showed a reduction in proteinuria without resulting in the known side effects of hyperkalemia and acute renal failure. The new oral potassium binder patiromer is suitable for long-term administration for the reduction of potassium and can effectively prevent the occurrence of hyperkalemia that occurred under conventional aldosterone antagonists.16.
Background
End stage renal disease (ESRD) patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) have a higher risk of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB).Aims
Whether ESRD patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) also carries a higher risk of PUB has not been studied.Methods
This was a cohort study using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance research database, whereby 11,408 patients, including 2,239 PD, 2,328 HD, 2,267 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 4,574 controls with age–sex matching were recruited. The log-rank test was used to analyze differences in accumulated PUB-free survival rates between groups. Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to evaluate independent risk factors for PUB in all the enrollees.Results
During the 7-year follow-up, PD and CKD patients had a significantly higher rate of PUB than matched controls. The risk of PUB between PD and CKD was not significantly different. Moreover, patients receiving HD carried a higher risk of PUB than those receiving PD, with CKD and controls (p all <0.05, by log-rank test). Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that CKD (HR 3.99, 95 % CI 2.24–7.13), PD (HR 3.71, 95 % CI 2.00–6.87) and HD (HR 11.96, 95 % CI 7.04–20.31) were independently associated with an increased risk of PUB. Being elderly, male, having hypertension, diabetes, cirrhosis, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and steroid use were other independent risk factors of PUB in all enrollees.Conclusions
Patients with CKD and ESRD receiving PD or HD carried a higher risk for PUB. They should be screened for risk factors for PUB and receive some protective measures to prevent PUB.17.
Zachary A. Marcum Christopher W. Forsberg Kathryn P. Moore Ian H. de Boer Nicholas L. Smith James S. Floyd 《Journal of general internal medicine》2018,33(2):155-165
Background
For patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD), high-quality evidence about the relative benefits and harms of oral glucose-lowering drugs is limited.Objective
To evaluate whether mortality risk differs after the initiation of monotherapy with either metformin or a sulfonylurea in Veterans with type 2 diabetes and CKD.Design
Observational, national cohort study in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).Participants
Veterans who received care from the VHA for at least 1 year prior to initiating monotherapy treatment for type 2 diabetes with either metformin or a sulfonylurea between 2004 and 2009.Main Measures
Metformin and sulfonylurea use was assessed from VHA electronic pharmacy records. The CKD-EPI equation was used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The outcome of death from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2009, was assessed from VHA Vital Status files.Key Results
Among 175,296 new users of metformin or a sulfonylurea monotherapy, 5121 deaths were observed. In primary analyses adjusted for all measured potential confounding factors, metformin monotherapy was associated with a lower mortality hazard ratio (HR) compared with sulfonylurea monotherapy across all ranges of eGFR evaluated (HR ranging from 0.59 to 0.80). A secondary analysis of mortality risk differences favored metformin across all eGFR ranges; the greatest risk difference was observed in the eGFR category 30–44 mL/min/1.73m2 (12.1 fewer deaths/1000 person-years, 95% CI 5.2–19.0).Conclusions
Initiation of metformin versus a sulfonylurea among individuals with type 2 diabetes and CKD was associated with a substantial reduction in mortality, in terms of both relative and absolute risk reduction. The largest absolute risk reduction was observed among individuals with moderately–severely reduced eGFR (30–44 mL/min/1.73m2).18.
Jason M. Glanz Komal J. Narwaney Shane R. Mueller Edward M. Gardner Susan L. Calcaterra Stanley Xu Kristin Breslin Ingrid A. Binswanger 《Journal of general internal medicine》2018,33(10):1646-1653
Background
Naloxone is a life-saving opioid antagonist. Chronic pain guidelines recommend that physicians co-prescribe naloxone to patients at high risk for opioid overdose. However, clinical tools to efficiently identify patients who could benefit from naloxone are lacking.Objective
To develop and validate an overdose predictive model which could be used in primary care settings to assess the need for naloxone.Design
Retrospective cohort.Setting
Derivation site was an integrated health system in Colorado; validation site was a safety-net health system in Colorado.Participants
We developed a predictive model in a cohort of 42,828 patients taking chronic opioid therapy and externally validated the model in 10,708 patients.Main Measures
Potential predictors and outcomes (nonfatal pharmaceutical and heroin overdoses) were extracted from electronic health records. Fatal overdose outcomes were identified from state vital records. To match the approximate shelf-life of naloxone, we used Cox proportional hazards regression to model the 2-year risk of overdose. Calibration and discrimination were assessed.Key Results
A five-variable predictive model showed good calibration and discrimination (bootstrap-corrected c-statistic?=?0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69–0.78) in the derivation site, with sensitivity of 66.1% and specificity of 66.6%. In the validation site, the model showed good discrimination (c-statistic?=?0.75, 95% CI 0.70–0.80) and less than ideal calibration, with sensitivity and specificity of 82.2% and 49.5%, respectively.Conclusions
Among patients on chronic opioid therapy, the predictive model identified 66–82% of all subsequent opioid overdoses. This model is an efficient screening tool to identify patients who could benefit from naloxone to prevent overdose deaths. Population differences across the two sites limited calibration in the validation site.19.
20.
Lena M. Biehl Rebeca Cruz Aguilar Fedja Farowski Werner Hahn Angela Nowag Hilmar Wisplinghoff Maria J. G. T. Vehreschild 《Infection》2018,46(6):871-874