Validation of the U.K. Working Party diagnostic criteria for atopic eczema in a Xhosa-speaking African population

BACKGROUND: Reliable diagnostic criteria for eczema are important for epidemiological comparisons. Although the U.K. diagnostic criteria for atopic eczema have performed well in an English language setting, limited data are available from other countries where cultural and linguistic factors may affect their validity. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the validity of the U.K. criteria for eczema in relation to clinical assessment by a dermatologist in a Xhosa-speaking South African population. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of 3067 children aged 3-11 years was conducted in rural, peri-urban and urban settings in South Africa. The prevalence of atopic eczema was determined using the U.K. diagnostic criteria and a clinical assessment by a dermatologist. Questions were translated into the local language (Xhosa). Trained researchers administered the questions to the children's parents or carers. The validity of the U.K. criteria was then determined by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and Youden's Index in relation to the dermatologist's examination. RESULTS: The point prevalence of atopic eczema according to a dermatologist was 1.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6-1.4], while the prevalence of visible flexural eczema according to the U.K. protocol was 1.8% (95% CI 1.3-2.2). The sensitivity and specificity of the U.K. criteria in this setting was 43.7% (95% CI 26.3-62.3) and 97.9% (97.3-98.4), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values of the U.K. criteria were 18.4% (95% CI 10.4-28.9) and 99.4% (95% CI 99.0-99.6), respectively. The presence of visible flexural eczema according to the U.K. photographic protocol was the best predictor of atopic eczema, with a sensitivity and specificity of 81.2% (95% CI 63.5-92.7) and 99.0% (95% CI 98.6-99.3), respectively, and a positive and negative predictive value of 48.1% (95% CI 34.3-62.1) and 99.8% (95% CI 99.5-99.9), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The validity of the full question-based version of the U.K. diagnostic criteria for atopic eczema in this South African setting is low, which may be due to a combination of translational and cultural issues. However, the one physical sign of visible flexural eczema performed well, suggesting that it alone might be a useful tool for future international comparative prevalence studies.     

Validation of the U.K. diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis in a population setting

Summary One reason why so little is known about the epidemiology of atopic dermatitis (AD) is lack of suitable diagnostic criteria. A simple list of diagnostic criteria for AD for use in epidemiological studies has recently been developed by a U.K. working party. These have performed well in hospital validation studies of subjects with skin diseases. This study sought to validate the newly proposed criteria for AD in a population setting by conducting a cross-sectional survey of 695 schoolchildren aged 3–11 years in three randomly selected primary schools in West Lambeth, London. As a point prevalence measure, the U.K. criteria had a sensitivity of 70%, a specificity of 93%, and a positive predictive value of 47% when compared with a dermatologist's examination findings. Subsequent analysis suggested that most children classified as false positives had suffered from AD in the last year, but were inactive at the time of examination. When adjusted for these cases, the sensitivity and specificity increased to 80 and 97%, respectively, corresponding to positive and negative predictive values of 80 and 97%, respectively. The U.K. diagnostic criteria for AD appear to work well as a 1-year period prevalence measure in London schoolchildren. Further validation in adults and other countries are needed.     

Prevalence of atopic dermatitis and serum IgE values in nursery school children in Ishigaki Island, Okinawa, Japan

There have been many studies of the prevalence of atopic dermatitis (AD), but few population-based epidemiologic studies measure the prevalence in Japan among children aged 5 years and younger. We examined the prevalence of AD, serum total IgE levels and specific IgE antibodies to 10 common allergens among children in Ishigaki Island, Okinawa, Japan in 2001. We also obtained information on the predictability of the U.K. Working Party diagnostic questionnaire criteria for AD in this population. Five hundred and sixty five children aged 5 years and younger were enrolled in this study with informed consent from their parents. The questionnaire of the U.K. Working Party diagnostic criteria for AD was translated into Japanese, and the parents completed the questionnaire sheet. Physical examination and blood sampling were done for all children. Thirty-nine out of the 565 (6.9%) children were diagnosed with AD by physical examination. The total and specific IgE levels were significantly higher in the children with AD than in those without AD. High levels of total IgE were found in 33.3% of the children with AD. A specific IgE to one or more allergens was detected in 64.1% of children with AD. However, a substantial population of children without AD also had high levels of total IgE (12.7%) and a specific IgE to one or more allergens (30.2%), and the increment of total and specific IgE levels was significantly associated with age. The percentage of positive answers to the questionnaire of the U.K. Working Party diagnostic criteria for AD was significantly higher in children with AD (59.0%) than in children without AD (5.3%) (P<0.0001). Its specificity was 94.7%. The false negative rate was 41%. In conclusion, the prevalence of AD was relatively low in children in Ishigaki Island. High levels of total IgE were found in only one third of children with AD under 5 years of age. The Japanese translated form of the questionnaire of the U.K. Working Party diagnostic criteria for AD should be refined to improve its sensitivity.     

Community validation of the U.K. diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis in Japanese elementary schoolchildren

BACKGROUND: A simple list of diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis for use in epidemiological studies was developed by a U.K. working party. This list served well for both hospital patients with skin diseases and in general population within the U.K. OBJECTIVES: To validate the U.K. diagnostic criteria in Japanese elementary schoolchildren, we collected the questionnaires on regular health checkups, which had been completed by parents of schoolchildren in 2001/2002 and 2004/2005. METHODS: Elementary schoolchildren were examined by dermatologists in eight areas (16,152 children) in 2001/2002 and in three areas (3849 children) in 2004/2005. The questionnaire was distributed to the parents 2 weeks before the skin examination, completed by the parents and collected after the survey. RESULTS: In 2002/2002 comparing the U.K. diagnostic criteria with the findings on clinical examination used as the reference standard, the U.K. criteria (1-year prevalence measure) showed a sensitivity of 71.8%, specificity of 89.3% and positive predictive value of 44.7%. In 2004/2005 we confirmed that the U.K. criteria for a point prevalence measure showed a higher positive predictive value (59.9%) compared with that for 1-year prevalence measure (49.3%). CONCLUSION: Now that we know the sensitivity and specificity of the U.K. criteria in the population examined in this study, we will be able in the near future to estimate the prevalence of atopic dermatitis in a similar population with reverse operation by questionnaires alone using these criteria without examination by dermatologists. Therefore, the validation study of U.K. criteria could be useful for future epidemiologic surveys.     

Diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) has a wide spectrum of dermatological manifestations and despite various validated sets of diagnostic criteria that have been developed over the past decades, there is disagreement about its definition. Nevertheless, clinical studies require valid diagnostic criteria for reliable and reproducible results. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the evidence concerning the validity of diagnostic criteria for AD. METHODS: All data sources were identified through searches on Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy tool (QUADAS) was used. Results are presented in a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plot. RESULTS: Out of the 20 articles that met the criteria, 27 validation studies were identified. In two studies concerning Hanifin and Rajka diagnostic criteria sensitivity and specificity ranged from 87.9% to 96.0% and from 77.6% to 93.8%, respectively. Nineteen validation studies of the U.K. diagnostic criteria showed sensitivity and specificity ranging from 10% to 100% and 89.3% to 99.1%, respectively. Three validation studies concerning the Schultz-Larsen criteria showed sensitivity from 88% to 94.4% and specificity from 77.6% to 95.9%. In one article concerning the criteria of Diepgen, the sensitivity ranged from 83.0% to 87.7% and the specificity from 83.9% to 87.0%. One article studied the Kang and Tian criteria and reported 95.5% sensitivity and 100% specificity. One article validating the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) criteria showed a positive and negative predictive value of 48.8% and 91.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: With this systematic review of the existing sets of diagnostic criteria for AD a varying number of validation studies with varying methodological quality was found. The U.K. diagnostic criteria are the most extensively validated. However, improvement of methodological design for validation studies and uniformity in well-validated and applicable diagnostic criteria are needed to improve future intervention studies and to compare study results.     

Comparative efficacy of Hanifin and Rajka''s criteria and the UK working party''s diagnostic criteria in diagnosis of atopic dermatitis in a hospital setting in North India

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (AD) depends on clinical features because no definitive diagnostic test exists. Criteria proposed by Hanifin and Rajka (Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1980; Suppl 92: 44-47) were acceptable for hospital-based studies but were found not to be suitable for field studies. A UK working party formulated clinical diagnostic criteria that could be used in both hospital and epidemiological settings. Validation studies of the criteria showed widely variable results, probably due to different clinical settings and ethnicity. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to validate Hanifin and Rajka's criteria and to assess the comparative efficacy of their criteria and the UK working party's diagnostic criteria in the diagnosis of AD in a hospital setting in North India. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study serially included 101 patients with AD and 48 controls of paediatric age group. The study period was from July 2003 to December 2004. RESULTS: Hanifin and Rajka's criteria (sensitivity 96%, specificity 93.75%, positive predictive value 97% (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) 91.84%) had a statistical advantage over the UK working party's diagnostic criteria (sensitivity 86%, specificity 95.83%, PPV 97.75% and NPV 76.67%), with a P-value < 0.005.     

Validation of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Children (ISAAC) and U.K. criteria for atopic eczema in Ethiopian children

BACKGROUND: Reliable diagnostic criteria for atopic eczema (AE) are essential in order to make international comparisons and to identify possible disease risk factors. Little is known about the prevalence of atopic eczema and validity of diagnostic criteria for AE in developing countries where English is not the first language. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the prevalence of AE in an area of urban and rural Ethiopia, and to compare the predictive values of different questionnaire and examination methods for diagnosing AE in this population. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 7915 children aged 1-5 years living in and around the town of Jimma in southwest Ethiopia. AE prevalence was assessed in two ways: (i) by using the International Study for Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) questionnaire, and (ii) using the U.K. refinement of Hanifin and Rajka's diagnostic criteria. All possible cases identified by screening questions and random samples of controls were then examined by an experienced local paediatrician, who acted as a reference standard to determine the predictive value of the criteria used to diagnose AE. RESULTS: The overall 1-year period prevalence of AE according to ISAAC and U.K. criteria was 4.4%[95% confidence interval (CI) 3.95-4.85] and 1.8% (95% CI 1.5-2.1), respectively. Corresponding point prevalence estimates (symptoms in the last week) were 1.8% for ISAAC and 1.3% for the U.K. criteria. The positive predictive values of the ISAAC and U.K. criteria questions for AE symptoms still reported to be present (in the last week) at the doctor's examination were 48.8% and 55.5%, respectively. Corresponding negative predictive values were 90.5% and 90.1%, respectively. The sign of visible flexural dermatitis (a component of the U.K. criteria) when used alone had positive and negative predictive values of 57% and 91%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Neither the ISAAC nor U.K. criteria performed especially well in predicting cases of AE in this survey. Possible reasons include problems with questionnaire translation, cultural conceptions of terminology, asking parents rather than the child about symptoms, the transient nature of AE signs, and differences in what a doctor perceives to constitute a typical case of AE. The results do not preclude the use of standardized diagnostic criteria alongside a doctor's examination in future surveys of Ethiopian children, and knowledge of the criteria's limited predictive value should help to interpret study findings that have employed such criteria. Consideration should be given to adopting the sign of visible flexural dermatitis as a standard for estimating the point prevalence of AE throughout the world because it is less susceptible to problems with translation and interpretation.     

Prevalence of atopic dermatitis in Japanese adults

BACKGROUND: Adult atopic dermatitis (AD) in Japan has become a significant social problem, with as many as one-third of adult patients with severe AD absenting themselves from work or classes due to aggravation of the disease. Reports of such patients have become increasingly common in recent years. Despite the pressing need for epidemiological studies to clarify the prevalence and distribution of AD and to determine its aetiology, no previous research has been carried out on the prevalence of AD within the adult population in Japan. OBJECTIVES: To clarify the prevalence of adult AD in Japan, using the U.K. Working Party's diagnostic criteria. METHODS: The subjects of this study were mostly government officials or their family members visiting the Medical Center of Health Science, Toranomon Hospital in Tokyo for annual health check-ups in the period from September 1997 to August 1998. Questionnaires completed by 10 762 persons (8076 men and 2686 women) aged 30 years or above were analysed. The questionnaire consisted of 14 questions on allergic disease. The U.K. Working Party's diagnostic criteria were used after translation into Japanese. Three types of prevalence were used as indicators of prevalence: point, 1-year and lifetime prevalence. RESULTS: The point prevalence, 1-year prevalence and lifetime prevalence of AD in Japanese adults were 2.9%, 3.0% and 3.3%, respectively. No significant statistical differences were observed between the sexes or among age groups within each sex. The survey indicated that 88.6% of those who had ever had AD were currently affected by active AD, while 93.4% of those who had had at least one episode of AD in the past had experienced an episode over the previous year. CONCLUSIONS: This study gives the first indication of the prevalence of adult AD among the Japanese, based on the U.K. criteria. Both the internal and external validity of this study are believed to be high; it would be safe to conclude that the 1-year prevalence of AD in Japanese adult populations living in urban areas is 3.0%.     

The prevalence of atopic dermatitis in Oregon schoolchildren

BACKGROUND: Although surveys from many parts of the world have shown that the prevalence of atopic dermatitis (AD) in schoolchildren has increased greatly in the past 40 years, there is no current prevalence information from the United States. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to investigate the utility of a recently developed European questionnaire to estimate the prevalence of AD in urban and rural Oregon schoolchildren. METHODS: The self-administered Schultz-Larsen questionnaire (SLQ) of AD symptoms and history was completed by the parents of a broad socioeconomic and ethnic mix of 5- to 9-year-old schoolchildren from 6 urban and 2 rural elementary schools in Oregon. Validation assessments included comparisons of the questionnaire scores with clinical examination in a group of age-matched children and with specific history components known to correlate with AD. RESULTS: Data showed a prevalence of 17.2% using standard scoring criteria for the SLQ and with a lower limit of 6.8% according to highly stringent criteria derived from the validation study using dermatologic examination. A single question ("Has a doctor ever said that your child has eczema?") was highly concordant with the questionnaire determination, yielding very high predictive accuracy (91.2%). CONCLUSION: This study of childhood AD frequency indicates a high prevalence of AD in the United States, comparable to that recently observed from studies in Europe and Japan. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;43:649-55.).     

The validity of a questionnaire-based epidemiological study of occupational dermatosis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of a questionnaire and medical anamnesis to identify persons with dermatitis in an occupational setting. The design was a clinical epidemiological cross-sectional study. The study was performed between the second and fourth week of January 2001. A questionnaire was followed a week later by a medical occupational interview and a clinical dermatological examination, including a comprehensive patch test with potential workplace chemicals. The anamnesis and the clinical examination were made independently by occupational and dermatological physicians, and the skin examination was performed blinded to anamnestic data. The setting was the mother plants of a Danish-based international company producing wind turbine systems. The study population was a workplace cohort, highly exposed to epoxy resin systems and other chemicals, and totalled 724 production workers at 4 facilities. The rate of participation was 84.7%. Using enquete questions of current skin rash against the clinical presence of dermatitis, we found a sensitivity of 22% and a specificity of 89%, compared to 45% and 87%, respectively, when the anamnestic work history, taken by an occupational physician, was the screening parameter. Using 'workplace periodic prevalence' of dermatitis, we found sensitivities in the range of 63-76% by a questionnaire and 70-83% by medical anamnesis. Questionnaire screening by skin symptoms gave the highest values for redness, a sensitivity of 33% and a specificity of 76%, and decreasing validity parameters as more symptoms were added to the list of screening questions. We found that the use of a questionnaire and medical anamnesis were problematic, when the purpose was screening for contact dermatitis and allergy, in this industrial cohort manufacturing reinforced plastic products. But these instruments might be useful for epidemiological surveillance, when the questionnaire has been validated in the given occupational setting.     

Medición de la prevalencia de la dermatitis atópica en una población escolar madrileña

—Background. The United Kingdom Working Party for Atopic Dermatitis has developed a diagnostic questionnaire, whose English and Romanian versions have been validated both in a hospital and out-of-hospital setting.Objective. Our objective was to develop a Spanish version of this questionnaire and use it to address the frequency of the disease in the general school-age population in Health Area No. 11 in Madrid.Results. The validation in a hospital setting showed a sensitivity of 76.5%, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 66.8-84.1%. Specificity was 90.4 % (CI = 83.8-94.6 %), the positive predictive value 85.7 % (CI = 76.4-91.8 %) and the negative predictive value 83.6 % (CI = 76.3-89 %). Five schools were selected at random, and all of their students were invited to participate in the study. 874 children were examined (Response rate: 62.9 %). The one-year period prevalence was 9.95% (7.97; 11.94). Point prevalence was 7.09% (5.39; 8.80). In the 3-7 age group, the one-year period prevalence was 11.2%; in the 8-12 group, 10.3%; and in the 13-17 group, 6.9%. There were no statistically significant differences when comparing by sex, age or type of school (public/private). The result offered by the questionnaire was validated through the clinical diagnosis of a dermatologist, in a sub-sample of 130 patients. The results obtained were: sensitivity = 63.6% (31.6; 87.6); specificity = 96.7% (91.4; 99.0); positive predictive value = 63.6 % (31.6; 87.6); negative predictive value = 96.7% (91.4; 99.0).Conclusions. We believe that the Spanish version that we have developed of the diagnostic questionnaire is useful and gives good results, along the lines of those published by other groups.     

Ascertainment of hand dermatitis using a symptom-based questionnaire; applicability in an industrial population

In this study, the applicability of a symptom-based questionnaire on hand dermatitis was assessed in a population of rubber workers. The questionnaire was previously validated in a study among nurses. 224 subjects employed in 9 different companies completed a questionnaire on skin complaints. Subsequently, 202 workers attended the physical examination of the skin by a dermatologist. The ascertainment of skin complaints according to the questionnaire was compared to the medical evaluation. The 2 different diagnostic tools used for assessing dermatitis resulted in dissimilar estimates of the prevalence of active hand dermatitis, ranging from 6.9% to 38.1% of all workers. Using the medical evaluation as 'gold standard' we observed a moderate sensitivity and specificity (respectively 71.4%; 95% CI: 47.7-95.1 and 76.1%; 95% CI: 70.0-82.2), a low positive predictive value (18.2%; 95% CI: 8.0-28.4) and a high negative predictive value (97.3%; 95% CI: 94.7-99.9) for the classification based on the self-administered questionnaire. When evaluated against 'first symptoms of dermatitis' the sensitivity decreased, while the specificity remained almost the same. The deviant findings between the present and the original validation study of the same questionnaire among nurses hamper its applicability in populations with different occupations. Therefore, if questionnaires are to be used, validity studies have to be carried out to evaluate differences in perception of skin diseases between different (occupational) populations.     

Validation of self-reporting of hand eczema among Danish hairdressing apprentices

Background. Hairdressing apprentices have a high incidence of hand eczema. Most studies use self‐reported hand eczema as a cost‐effective method to estimate the prevalence of hand eczema. No validation studies on self‐reported hand eczema among hairdressing apprentices exist. Objectives. To evaluate the validity of self‐reporting of hand eczema among Danish hairdressing apprentices. Methods. During their first 2 weeks of training, 502 hairdressing apprentices were enrolled in this study. All apprentices completed a self‐administered questionnaire including questions regarding, for example, current hand eczema, and they were all clinically examined for hand eczema three times during the first part of their education by use of the Hand Eczema Severity Index. The validity of self‐reporting of hand eczema was measured with the clinical examination as the gold standard. Results. The sensitivity of self‐reporting of hand eczema was 70.3%, and the specificity was 99.8%. The positive predictive value was 96.3%, and the negative predictive value was 98.5%. Conclusions. We found good agreement between self‐reporting of hand eczema and clinical examination. There was good sensitivity and high specificity. Self‐reporting of hand eczema among hairdressing apprentices is considered to be a valid method for estimating the prevalence of hand eczema, although it might underestimate the true prevalence.     

Validation of the diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the accuracy of newly proposed diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis (AD). DESIGN: Double-blind, cross-sectional study comparing the achievement of new criteria with the diagnosis of a dermatologist. SETTING: A private, general dermatology, outpatient clinic. PATIENTS: A sample of 416 consecutive patients attending the clinic within 2 months (146 males and 270 females), consisting of 60 patients with AD and 356 control patients with other skin diseases. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of proposed criteria in the diagnosis of AD. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of proposed diagnostic criteria for AD were 10.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1%-21.2%), 98.3% (95% CI, 96.2%-99.3%), 50.0% (95% CI, 22.3%-77.7%), and 86.6% (95% CI, 82.8%-89.7%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These diagnostic criteria for AD are highly specific and are suitable for clinical trials. However, they may not achieve enough sensitivity to be useful for large, population-based epidemiological studies or for routine clinical practice, at least in Iran.     

特应性皮炎张氏诊断标准在苏南地区青少年和成人的适用性评估

【摘要】 目的 评估特应性皮炎（AD）张氏诊断标准在苏南地区青少年和成人的适用性。方法 收集2019年5月至2021年5月来自苏南地区7家医院皮肤科初诊为湿疹或AD的病例1 769例。由研究人员自行设计调查表,主要包括患者的个人信息、相关病史及临床特征、实验室检查等内容,由患者和皮肤科医生共同完成标准化问卷。以Hanifin-Rajka标准为金标准,分别评估Williams标准、张氏标准、日本皮肤病学会标准的敏感性和特异性。结果 1 769例患者中男759例（42.9%）,女1 010例（57.1%）,年龄（32.2 ± 8.2）岁（12 ~ 79岁）。AD患者的临床特征中瘙痒的发生率占首位（96.7%,883/913）。以Hanifin-Rajka标准为“金标准”,913例（51.6%）被诊断为AD;张氏标准诊断敏感性为92.6%（845/913）,特异性为73.2%（627/856）;Williams标准诊断敏感性为87.8%（802/913）,特异性为81.3%（696/856）;JDA标准敏感性为96.9%（885/913）,特异性为68.9%（590/856）。张氏标准与Williams标准诊断一致性一般（Kappa值 = 0.61,P = 0.009）,张氏标准与JDA标准诊断一致性高（Kappa值 = 0.85,P = 0.001）,Williams标准与JDA标准诊断一致性一般（Kappa值 = 0.51,P = 0.013）。结论 与Hanifin-Rajka标准相比,张氏标准对于苏南地区青少年和成人AD的诊断表现出良好的敏感性和特异性,但瘙痒对AD的诊断亦非常重要。     

Various diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis (AD): A proposal of Reliable Estimation of Atopic Dermatitis in Childhood (REACH) criteria,a novel questionnaire‐based diagnostic tool for AD

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a heterogeneous disease that manifests with a wide variety of clinical symptoms and signs. Due to the lack of definitive biomarkers for AD, it is very difficult to set up standard diagnostic criteria for AD which cover the entire spectrum of AD patients. Various instruments have been proposed for AD diagnosis, and they can be classified into a hospital setting or a community setting. From the preventive medicine viewpoint, questionnaire‐based diagnostic criteria in a community setting are important to detect and manage childhood AD patients properly. In this article, various diagnostic criteria for AD in hospital and community settings will be reviewed. Additionally, the Reliable Estimation of Atopic Dermatitis in Childhood (REACH), a new full questionnaire‐based diagnostic tool for childhood AD, will be reviewed.     

A prospective study of the prevalence and incidence of atopic dermatitis in children aged 0-42 months

BACKGROUND: There is strong evidence that the incidence and prevalence of atopic diseases is increasing. However, estimates of the prevalence of atopic dermatitis (AD) have varied greatly in the U.K. and most parts of the developed world. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to estimate the prevalence and incidence of AD between the ages of 0 and 42 months in children born in the 1990s in a defined population in the U.K. DESIGN: We used data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood (ALSPAC), a large population-based study in the U.K. that enrolled all pregnant mothers who were resident in Avon and had their delivery date falling between 1 April 1991 and 31 December 1992. Since then ALSPAC has collected a wide range of data from the newborns and their parents. Data reported here were collected at 6, 18, 30 and 42 months using parental reports in a postal questionnaire. Of the 14 009 children originally enrolled 8530 provided information on AD in each of the four follow-up questionnaires. We defined AD as a report of rash in at least two of the four questionnaires. Incidence risk was defined as the percentage of new cases of AD between follow-up questionnaires, out of the total number of children whose parents had not reported that they had AD by the time of the previous follow-up. RESULTS: Period prevalence of 21.0%, 25.6%, 23.2% and 19.9% were observed at ages 0-6, 6-18, 18-30 and 30-42 months, respectively. The corresponding incidence risks were 21.0%, 11.2% and 3.8%, at 0-6, 6-18 and 18-30 months, respectively. There were no gender differences in either the incidence or prevalence of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this large, prospective study are consistent with recent reports of increased incidence and prevalence of AD. Health planners can use our estimates of incidence and prevalence to project the number of children likely to suffer from AD during infancy and early childhood, and thus to determine the human and financial resources required.     

A comparison between criteria for diagnosing atopic eczema in infants

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies have shown different estimates of the frequency of atopic eczema (AE) in children. This may be explained by several factors including variations in the definition of AE, study design, age of study group, and the possibility of a changed perception of atopic diseases. The role of IgE sensitization in AE is a matter of debate. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and cumulative incidence of AE in a group of unselected infants followed prospectively from birth to 18 months of age using different diagnostic criteria; to evaluate the agreement between criteria; and to describe the association between atopic heredity and postnatal sensitization, respectively, and the development of AE according to the different diagnostic criteria. METHODS: During a 1-year period a consecutive series of 1095 newborns and their parents were approached at the maternity ward at the Odense University Hospital, Denmark and a cohort of 562 newborns was established. Infants were examined and followed prospectively from birth and at 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months of age. AE was diagnosed using four different criteria, the Hanifin and Rajka criteria, the Schultz-Larsen criteria, the Danish Allergy Research Centre (DARC) criteria developed for this study and doctor-diagnosed visible eczema with typical morphology and atopic distribution. Additionally, the U.K. diagnostic criteria based on a questionnaire were used at 1 year of age. Agreement between the four criteria was analysed at each time point and over time, and agreement between the four criteria and the U.K. questionnaire criteria was analysed. RESULTS: The cumulative 1-year prevalence of AE using the Hanifin and Rajka criteria was 9.8% (95% confidence interval, CI 7-13%), for the Schultz-Larsen criteria it was 7.5% (95% CI 5-10%), for the DARC criteria 8.2% (95% CI 6-11%), for visible eczema 12.2% (95% CI 9-16%) and for the U.K. criteria 7.5% (95% CI 5-10%). The pairwise agreement between criteria showed good agreement, with rates varying between 93% and 97% and kappa scores between 0.6 and 0.8. Agreement analysis of diagnoses between the four criteria demonstrated that cumulative incidences showed better agreement than point prevalence values. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between different criteria for diagnosing AE was acceptable, but the mild cases constituted a diagnostic problem, although they were in the minority. Repeated examinations gave better agreement between diagnostic criteria than just one examination. Atopic heredity was less predictive for AE than sensitization to common food and inhalant allergens in early childhood.     

Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis: validity of the criteria of Williams et al. in a hospital-based setting

BACKGROUND: Surveys of the prevalence of atopic dermatitis (AD) have been carried out world-wide, but the results vary widely. The differences probably result from the use of different diagnostic criteria. Williams et al. proposed minimum, simplified, diagnostic criteria that require no invasive test and are easy to use. Pilot studies in European countries showed their suitability for implementation both in hospitals and in the community, and their high sensitivity and specificity. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the potential practical value of the criteria of Williams et al. in the Chinese population. METHODS: The criteria of Hanifin and Rajka (gold standard), Williams et al. and Kang and Tian were applied and compared in 111 patients with AD and 121 control subjects with other skin diseases in three out-patient centres in China. RESULTS: The criteria of Williams et al. showed a similar diagnostic efficiency to that of the gold standard, with the sensitivity, specificity and kappa value reaching 95.50%, 97.52% and 0.93, respectively. No significant difference was found between the criteria of Williams et al. and those of Kang and Tian (chi2 = 0.69, P > 0.05). 'Onset under the age of 2 years', a criterion of Williams et al. could be used in subjects of any age. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic efficiency of the criteria of Williams et al. was basically similar to those of Hanifin and Rajka and of Kang and Tian in our out-patient settings. However, those of Williams et al. were easier to apply and required no invasive tests.     

The prevalence of common skin conditions in Australian school students: 2. Atopic dermatitis

The prevalence of atopic dermatitis (AD) was recorded following examination by dermatologists and dermatology registrars of a random sample of 2491 school students throughout the State of Victoria, Australia. The overall prevalence, based on clinical examination, was 16.3% (95% confidence interval, CI 14.1-18.5), being higher in girls (17.7%; 95% CI 15.0-20.4) than boys (14.8%; 95% CI 11.8-17.8). Using the U.K. Working Party Diagnostic Criteria for AD reduced the prevalence to 10.8% (95% CI 9.3-12.3) with the prevalence in girls 12.3% (95% CI 10.1-14.4) and in boys 9.2% (95% CI 7.1-11.4). The prevalence was highest in 4-6 year olds (18.7% on clinical examination, 11.5% using the U.K. Working Party Criteria), decreasing with increasing age to 11.6% on clinical examination (8. 6% on U.K. Working Party Criteria) among 16-18 year olds. Most of those with AD were classified as having mild disease (54.1%), with 32.1% classified as having minimal and 13.8% as having moderate to severe disease. Over 80% of those who reported on the questionnaire that they had dermatitis that was then confirmed on examination had been using one or more products to treat it. Nearly 90% of these products were classified as efficacious, with medical practitioners being the major source of advice for their use (77%). Pharmacists (8%), family/friends (6%) and others (9%), including beauticians and naturopaths, made up the remainder of the persons from whom those affected had sought advice about their treatment. These data, the first community-based prevalence data on AD published from Australia, confirm that the condition is common among those of school age. There is a need for AD to be included among those conditions that are discussed in health education lessons in schools.