Oral midazolam in children: effect of time and adjunctive therapy.

The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of timing and concomitant administration of atropine and/or meperidine on the perioperative effects of oral midazolam in children. In 154 healthy children, 1-8 yr old, we studied six oral preanesthetic medication regimens according to a randomized, double-blind protocol. Group A (placebo) received 5 mL of apple juice. The other five groups received medication with apple juice to a total volume of 5 mL, 20-60 min before induction of anesthesia. Group B received atropine (0.02 mg/kg); group C received midazolam (0.5 mg/kg); group D received midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) and atropine (0.02 mg/kg); group E received meperidine (1.5 mg/kg) and atropine (0.02 mg/kg); and group F received meperidine (1.5 mg/kg), atropine (0.02 mg/kg), and midazolam (0.5 mg/kg). The sedative effect of midazolam was maximal 30 min after oral administration. Ninety-five percent of the children who were separated from their parents within 45 min after oral midazolam administration (with or without atropine) had satisfactory separation scores (vs 66% of those separated after 45 min; P less than 0.02). Midazolam-treated patients were more cooperative with a mask induction of anesthesia compared with non-midazolam-treated children (83% vs 56%). Neither atropine nor meperidine appeared to significantly improve the effectiveness of oral midazolam. No preoperative changes in heart rate, respiratory rate, or hemoglobin oxygen saturation were noted in any of the treatment groups. Finally, oral midazolam did not prolong recovery even after outpatient procedures lasting less than 30 min. In conclusion, midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) given orally 30-45 min before induction of anesthesia is safe and effective without delaying recovery after ambulatory surgery.     

Premedication with midazolam delays recovery after ambulatory sevoflurane anesthesia in children.

We studied the effect of oral premedication with midazolam on the recovery characteristics of sevoflurane anesthesia in small children. In a randomized, double-blinded study, 60 children (1-3 yr, ASA physical status I or II) undergoing ambulatory adenoidectomy received either midazolam 0.5 mg/kg (Group M) or placebo (Group P) PO approximately 30 min before the induction of anesthesia. All children received atropine 0.01 mg/kg IV and alfentanil 10 microg/kg IV before the induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane up to 8 vol% inspired concentration in N2O 67% in O2. Tracheal intubation was facilitated with mivacurium 0.2 mg/kg. Anesthesia was continued with sevoflurane adjusted to maintain hemodynamic stability. In the postanesthesia care unit, predetermined recovery end points (emergence, recovery, discharge) were recorded. A pain/ discomfort scale was used to determine the quality of recovery. A postoperative questionnaire was used to evaluate the well-being of the patient at home 24 h after surgery. Emergence (spontaneous eye opening), recovery (full points on the modified Aldrete scale), and discharge were achieved later in Group M than in Group P (15+/-6 vs. 11+/-3 min [P = 0.002], 25+/-17 vs. 16+/-6 min [P = 0.01], and 80+/-23 vs. 70+/-23 min [P = 0.03]). Side effects, postanesthetic excitement, and analgesic treatment did not differ significantly between groups. At home, more children in Group P (30%) experienced disturbed sleep during the night compared with those in Group M (4%) (P = 0.007). IMPLICATIONS: In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, premedication with midazolam 0.5 mg/kg PO delayed recovery in children 1-3 yr of age after brief (<30 min) sevoflurane anesthesia. Except for more peaceful sleep at home, premedication did not affect the quality of recovery.     

The comparative dose-response effects of melatonin and midazolam for premedication of adult patients: a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study

We designed this prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to compare the perioperative effects of different doses of melatonin and midazolam. Doses of 0.05, 0.1, or 0. 2 mg/kg sublingual midazolam or melatonin or placebo were given to 84 women, approximately 100 min before a standard anesthetic. Sedation, anxiety, and orientation were quantified before, 10, 30, 60, and 90 min after premedication, and 15, 30, 60, and 90 min after admission to the recovery room. Psychomotor performance of the patient was evaluated at these times also, by using the digit-symbol substitution test and Trieger dot test. Patients who received premedication with either midazolam or melatonin had a significant decrease in anxiety levels and increase in levels of sedation preoperatively compared with control subjects. Patients in the three midazolam groups experienced significant psychomotor impairment in the preoperative period compared with melatonin or placebo. After operation, patients who received 0.2 mg/kg midazolam premedication had increased levels of sedation at 90 min compared with 0.05 and 0. 1 mg/kg melatonin groups. In addition, patients in the three midazolam groups had impairment of performance on the digit-symbol substitution test at all times compared with the 0.05 mg/kg melatonin group. Premedication with 0.05 mg/kg melatonin was associated with preoperative anxiolysis and sedation without impairment of cognitive and psychomotor skills or affecting the quality of recovery. Implications: Premedication with 0.05 mg/kg melatonin was associated with preoperative anxiolysis and sedation without impairment of cognitive and psychomotor skills or affecting the quality of recovery.     

Premedication of children with oral midazolam

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the safety, efficacy and feasibility of oral midazolam premedication in children were evaluated in an ambulatory surgery unit. Eighty unmedicated children (ASA PS I or II, ages 1-6 yr) were randomly assigned to one of four groups receiving midazolam 0.5, 0.75, or 1.0 mg.kg-1 or a placebo 30 min before separation from parents. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, sedation and anxiolysis scores were recorded before premedication, every five minutes for 30 min and then during induction of anaesthesia and recovery. We found that heart rate, systolic blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation and respiratory rate were unchanged during the study. Sedation and anxiolysis scores in the midazolam-treated groups were greater than those in the placebo group and that anxiolysis at the time of separation from the parents was judged excellent in 80-90% of the children who received midazolam. However, sedation and anxiolysis did not differ among the three midazolam groups. Mean times to discharge from hospital were similar for all four groups. The side effects, loss of balance and head control, blurred vision and dysphoric reactions were observed only in the 0.75 and 1.0 mg.kg-1 midazolam groups. We conclude that oral midazolam 0.5 mg.kg-1 is a safe and effective premedication and that 0.75 and 1 mg.kg-1 while offering no additional benefit, may cause more side effects.     

Oral midazolam is an effective premedication for children having day-stay anaesthesia.

The effect of oral premedication was studied in a double-blind, randomised trial of 200 children undergoing day-stay anaesthesia. Midazolam 0.25 mg/kg, midazolam 0.5 mg/kg, diazepam 0.5 mg/kg or a placebo was given orally one hour prior to anaesthesia. Patient state was assessed at nine stages, from administration of the premedication up to and including induction of anaesthesia, using a four-point behavioural scale. Patient state was also assessed postoperatively in the recovery area and the day-stay ward. There was no difference between the four groups until induction of anaesthesia. At this stage 82% of children were either asleep or awake and calm. Patients who received midazolam 0.5 mg/kg were more likely to be asleep or awake and calm at induction rather than other groups (P = 0.05). Children receiving midazolam 0.5 mg/kg or diazepam 0.5 mg/kg slept longest in the post anaesthetic recovery room (P less than 0.005), and spent most time there (P less than .005). There was no difference between groups in the length of time spent in the day-stay ward or in the number of overnight admissions. The study shows that a high proportion of unsedated children are calm at induction of anaesthesia and that oral midazolam is an effective premedication in children for day-stay anaesthesia.     

Injectable midazolam as oral premedicant in pediatric neurosurgery

In a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study; the acceptability, efficacy and safety of injectable midazolam as oral premedicant in children was evaluated. One hundred children (ASA 1,2) aged 6 months to 6 years, undergoing elective neurosurgical operations, like meningomyelocele, meningo-encephalocele, ventriculo peritoneal and other shunts and craniotomies for tumour decompression etc., were included in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups (A, B, C, D) receiving respectively saline or 0.50, 0.75 and 1.0 mg/kg midazolam in honey, 45 min before separation from parents. All received identical general anesthesia (GA). Age, sex, weight, heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, saturation (SaO2), reaction to parent's separation, sedation score and duration of anesthesia, recovery conditions and side effects were noted.We found no difference in age, sex, weight, patient acceptability vomiting after ingestion and duration of anesthesia between groups. Even though many children resisted the placement of premedicant in the mouth, only three children spat it out and none vomited after swallowing. The reaction to separation from parents was better after midazolam premedication. However, on reaching the operating room, 24% children (placebo-60%) were found anxious after 0.50 mg/kg, but 12% were deeply sedated after a dose of 1.0 mg/kg. Recovery was similar in groups A, B and C except that more (48%) patients were anxious in group A. Recovery, however was delayed in 16% patients of group D. Though, fewer complications were reported during recovery after midazolam than placebo premedication, they were minimal in the 0.75 mg/kg group.We concluded that giving injectable midazolam orally as premedication in pediatric age group scheduled for neurosurgical operations is acceptable, effective and safe in 0.75 mg/kg dose. While 0.50 mg/kg is less effective, 1.0 mg/kg does not offer any additional benefit over 0.75 mg/kg but does delay recovery and may compromise safety.     

Oral midazolam in paediatric premedication

In a premedication study involving 135 children, aged 1-10 years, four regimens were investigated: (i) no premedication; (ii) oral trimeprazine tartrate 2 mg/kg, methadone 0.1 mg/kg, droperidol 0.15 mg/kg (TMD); (iii) intramuscular midazolam (Dormicum; Roche) 0.15 mg/kg; and (iv) oral midazolam 0.45 mg/kg. All premedications were given 60 minutes before a standard halothane anaesthetic. No impairment of cardiovascular stability occurred but after premedication the mean oxygen saturation decreased by 1.6% and 1.1%, respectively, in the intramuscular midazolam and TMD groups. Overall, children under 5 years of age behaved less satisfactorily in the holding room and at induction, than those over 5 years (P less than 0.01). Midazolam, intramuscularly and orally, produced more satisfactory behaviour than the other two regimens (P less than 0.05) and, combined with a 70% more rapid recovery than the TMD regimen (P less than 0.05), suggests that oral midazolam is a more effective paediatric premedication agent than placebo or TMD.     

Midazolam premedication delays recovery from propofol-induced sevoflurane anesthesia in children 1–3 yr

PURPOSE: To study the effect of midazolam premedication on the recovery characteristics of sevoflurane anesthesia induced with propofol in pediatric outpatients. METHODS: Sixty children, one to three years, presenting for ambulatory adenoidectomy were randomly assigned , in a double-blind fashion, to receive either 0.5 mg x kg(-1) midazolam (Group M) or placebo (Group P) p.o. 30 min before anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced with 10 microg x kg(-1) atropine, 10 microg x kg(-1) alfentanil, and 3-4 mg x kg(-1) propofol i.v.. Tracheal intubation was facilitated with 0.2 mg x kg(-1) mivacurium. Anesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide/oxygen (FiO2 0.3) and sevoflurane with controlled ventilation. Recovery characteristics were compared using the modified Aldrete scoring system, the Pain/Discomfort scale and measuring specific recovery end-points (emergence, full Aldrete score, discharge). A postoperative questionnaire was used to evaluate the children's well-being at home until 24 hr after discharge. RESULTS: Emergence from anesthesia (22 +/- 9 vs 16 +/- 6 min (mean +/- SD), P = 0.005) and achieving full Aldrete scores (30 +/- 11 vs 24 +/- 16 min, P = 0.006) were delayed in patients receiving midazolam. Children in the placebo group were given postoperative analgesia sooner than those in the midazolam group (18 +/- 11 vs 23 +/- 8 min, P = 0.009). More children premedicated with midazolam suffered from arousal distress (20% vs 3%, P = 0.04) and scored higher on the Pain/Discomfort scale (P = 0.004) at 20 min after arrival in the recovery room. Discharge was not affected by premedication and well-being at home was similar in the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oral premedication with midazolam delays early recovery but not discharge after ambulatory sevoflurane anesthesia induced with propofol in children one to three years. Midazolam did not improve the quality of recovery.     

Pharmacokinetic studies following intravenous and rectal administration of midazolam in children

In children, rectal midazolam is being used increasingly for premedication, as this substance is reported to have a short half-life and rapid action. Above all it is the only known diazepam derivative with a good correlation of plasma concentration and clinical action despite its receptor binding capacity. As pharmacokinetic data in children are lacking and different dose regimens for rectal premedication exist, we studied plasma concentrations in 3 groups of children. METHODS. After obtaining informed parental consent we studied children aged 3-7 years (15-30 kg body weight) ASA I status scheduled for minor elective surgery. Group 1 (n = 6) received 0.1 mg/kg midazolam i.v. for induction of anesthesia. Group 2 (n = 10) was premedicated with 0.35 mg/kg midazolam, instilled just behind the anal sphincter; group 3 (n = 5) received 0.5 mg/kg midazolam rectally. Blood samples were drawn up to 120 min after application. The anesthesia technique consisted of N2O/O2, enflurane, intubation and the use of muscle relaxants, if necessary. Midazolam plasma levels were measured by HPLC. RESULTS. There were no differences with respect to age or body weight. Group 1: half-life in children was shorter than in adults, Vdss was smaller and clearance identical. Group 2: Rectal midazolam 0.35 mg/kg has a remarkably short onset of action with peak plasma concentrations (71 ng/ml) in the range of sedative levels in adults occurring in 7.5 min. After 2 h they reached levels of 30 ng/ml. Group 3 patients had peak levels of midazolam of 246 ng/ml after 12.5 min, falling to an average concentration of 120 ng/ml after 2 h. The bioavailability of rectal midazolam, comparing the area under the median curves, is 4.7% in group 2 and 16.1% in group 3. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of midazolam in our patients showed a shorter half-life, probably due to the higher hepatic clearance based on the high CI in children, as midazolam is known to have a first-pass effect of 30-70%. The increased metabolic transformation and the smaller amount of fatty tissue accounts for the smaller Vdss in children compared to adults. Rectal midazolam has a remarkably short onset and especially in a dose of 0.5 mg/kg prolonged action due to ongoing resorption from the rectum as demonstrated by the clinically relevant plasma concentrations. This fact must be taken into consideration in the overall anesthesia management.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

A comparison of morphine-perphenazine and midazolam on preoperative sedation and arterial oxygen saturation

The effectiveness of midazolam and a mixture of morphine-perphenazine premedication to produce sedation and their effects on preoperative oxygen saturation (SaO2) were examined. Eighty-five patients whose SaO2 measured with a pulse oximeter was greater than 90% and who were not receiving narcotic sedatives or oxygen were randomized to three groups. Each patient had his SaO2 recorded before premedication with placebo (saline), midazolam 0.08 mg.kg-1 or morphine 0.15 mg.kg-1 with perphenazine 2.5-5.0 mg im. From 30-90 min later, prior to anaesthesia SaO2 was repeated, and a sedation score was obtained by a blinded observer using a seven point scale. Median sedation scores were greater for midazolam (4) than for morphine-perphenazine (2) and placebo (1) (P less than 0.0001). As well, there was a decrease in the SaO2 in the morphine-perphenazine group (1.7 +/- 2.7%, P less than 0.001) but not in the midazolam and placebo groups (0.1 +/- 2.3%, -0.8 +/- 2.1%). In conclusion midazolam produced greater sedation than morphine-perphenazine and placebo without effect on SaO2 whereas morphine-perphenazine showed a decrease in SaO2 preoperatively.     

Premedication with nasal s-ketamine and midazolam provides good conditions for induction of anesthesia in preschool children

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intranasally administered s-ketamine and midazolam for premedication in pediatric patients. METHODS: Ninety children were randomly allocated to receive intranasally administered s-ketamine 1 mg.kg(-1) and midazolam 0.2 mg.kg(-1) (Group K1, n = 30), s-ketamine 2 mg.kg(-1) and midazolam 0.2 mg.kg(-1) (Group K2, n = 30), or midazolam 0.2 mg.kg(-1) (Group M, n = 30) as premedicants, using a double-blind study design. Sedation and anxiolysis were evaluated using a sedation and cooperation scale and recorded at several time points. RESULTS: Acceptable conditions (K1: 23; K2: 26, M: 19) for parental separation were not different between groups. Induction conditions were acceptable in 26 patients in K2 (P < 0.05 vs M) (K1: 23; M: 19). Compared to baseline values individual conditions significantly improved in groups K1 and K2 from 2.5 min after premedication until induction of anesthesia (P < 0.003), in group M conditions improved only five minutes after premedication (P < 0.05). Adverse effects observed in this series were within an acceptable range and similar for the three groups. CONCLUSION: Intranasal administration of s-ketamine and midazolam is an appropriate premedication in preschool children.     

Premedication with melatonin: a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison with midazolam

We have evaluated the perioperative effects of melatonin with those of midazolam in 75 women in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were given sublingual midazolam 15 mg, melatonin 5 mg or placebo, approximately 100 min before a standard anaesthetic. Sedation, anxiety and orientation were quantified before, and 10, 30, 60 and 90 min after premedication, and 15, 30, 60 and 90 min after admission to the recovery room. Psychomotor performance was evaluated at these times also, using the digit-symbol substitution test (DSST) and the Trieger dot test (TDT). Patients who received premedication with either midazolam or melatonin had a significant decrease in anxiety levels and increase in levels of sedation before operation compared with controls. Midazolam produced the highest scores for sedation at 30 and 60 min after administration and significant psychomotor impairment in the preoperative period compared with melatonin or placebo. After operation, patients who received midazolam or melatonin premedication had increased levels of sedation at 30 min and impairment in performance on the DSST at 15, 30 and 90 min compared with controls. There were no significant differences between the three groups for anxiety levels or TDT performance after operation. Amnesia was notable only in the midazolam group for one preoperative event (entry into the operating room). Patient satisfaction was noted in the midazolam and melatonin groups only. We have demonstrated that melatonin can be used effectively for premedication of adult patients.      

A Comparative Clinical Study of Three Different Dosages of Intramuscular Midazolam–Medetomidine–Ketamine Immobilization in Cats

A low dose of midazolam–medetomidine–ketamine (MMK) combination was evaluated in three increasing dosages. Each of the 18 cats was randomly allocated for several times to one of four groups. Five minutes after premedication with intramuscular (IM) 0.04 mg/kg atropine, group A (n = 43), B (n = 40) and C (n = 28) all were anaesthetized with 0.5 mg/kg midazolam, combined with 10, 20 or 30 μg/kg medetomidine, and 1.0, 2.0 or 3.0 mg/kg ketamine, respectively, IM in one syringe. Group D (n = 11) received the established combination of 50 μg/kg medetomidine and 10.0 mg/kg ketamine for comparison. Because this study was in cooperation with a project on dental prophylaxis, cats had to be immobilized for approximately 1 h. Therefore, anaesthesia was prolonged with propofol to effect, if necessary. Duration of MMK anaesthesia was between 30 ± 15, 45 ± 19 and 68 ± 28 min in groups A, B and C respectively. A significant decrease of respiratory rate was observed with increasing dosage, but venous carbon dioxide (pCO₂) and pH values in combination with arterial oxygen saturation (SpO₂) values were not alarming. The diastolic blood pressure particularly showed an increase. MMK combination A showed the best cardiovascular results, but it cannot be recommended due to disadvantages like a long induction time sometimes accompanied by excitations and the short duration of surgical immobilization. Dosage C in contrast had fewer side effects but less favourable cardiovascular results and a longer recovery period. However, either dosage B or C was suitable as a repeatable IM immobilization method for non‐invasive procedures in healthy cats.     

Oral premedication in children: a comparison of chloral hydrate, diazepam, alprazolam, midazolam and placebo for day surgery

A double-blind study consisting of 339 randomly selected children investigated the effects of several premedicants on the preoperative and postoperative behaviour of children who underwent day-stay surgery. Patients were allocated into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 165 children aged between 6 and 47 months. Group 2 consisted of 174 children aged four years and older to a body weight of 50 kg. Each child received one premedicant. Both groups included alprazolam 0.005 mg/kg, midazolam 0.3 mg/kg and placebo. In addition Group 1 included chloral hydrate 40 mg/kg and Group 2 diazepam 0.25 mg/kg. Chloral hydrate produced superior conditions (more patients calm or asleep) at induction of anaesthesia. Postoperative behaviour and incidence of vomiting were similar for all drugs. No premedicant reduced anxiety in the older group. The time to awaken postoperatively with diazepam was longer than with placebo. Alprazolam and midazolam were unpalatable for children over four years and conferred no advantage over placebo.     

Blood oxygen saturation levels during conscious sedation with midazolam. A report of 16 cases

In a double-blind randomized study on 16 healthy individuals, two groups of subjects (8 in each group) received either midazolam (Dormicum; Roche) 0.1 mg/kg or placebo intravenously for conscious sedation during oral surgical procedures. Oxygen saturation of the blood was measured at different stages. Ten minutes after administration of the drug, the percentage oxygen saturation was significantly lower (P less than 0.05) in the midazolam group than in the placebo group.     

Reevaluation of Rectal Ketamine Premedication in Children: Comparison with Rectal Midazolam

Background: Results of previous studies of rectal ketamine as a pediatric premedication are clouded because of lack of dose-response relation, inappropriate time of assessing sedative effects, and previous administration or coadministration of benzodiazepines. Therefore, the authors reevaluated the efficacy of rectally administered ketamine in comparison with 1 mg/kg rectal midazolam.

Methods: Sixty-six infants and children (age, 7-61 months) who were American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and who were undergoing minor surgeries as in-patients were randomized to receive 5 mg/kg ketamine (n = 16), 7 mg/kg ketamine (n = 16), 10 mg/kg ketamine (n = 17), or 1 mg/kg midazolam (n = 17) via rectum. A blinded observer scored sedation 45 min and 15 min after administration of ketamine and midazolam, respectively, when children were separated from parent(s) for inhalational induction. All children underwent standardized general anesthesia with sevoflurane, nitrous oxide, and oxygen with endotracheal intubation. Blood pressure, heart rate, and oxyhemoglobin saturation were determined before, during, and after anesthesia. Postoperative recovery characteristics and incidence of adverse reactions were also assessed.

Results: Most children (88%) who received rectally 10 mg/kg ketamine or 1 mg/kg midazolam separated easily from their parents compared with those (31%) who received 7 or 5 mg/kg rectal ketamine (P < 0.05). Similarly, more children who received 10 mg/kg ketamine or 1 mg/kg midazolam underwent mask induction without struggling or crying compared with those who received 7 or 5 mg/kg ketamine (P < 0.05). There were no clinically significant changes in blood pressure, heart rate, and oxyhemoglobin saturation after administration of either drug. Immediately after surgery, more children receiving midazolam or 5 mg/kg ketamine were agitated compared with 7 or 10 mg/kg ketamine. Ketamine, 7 and 10 mg/kg, provided postoperative analgesia, but the largest dose of ketamine was associated with delayed emergence from general anesthesia.     

Oral midazolam premedication for children with congenital cyanotic heart disease under-going cardiac surgery: a comparative study

To determine whether oral midazolam is a safe and effective alternative to our current standard premedication for children with cyanotic congenital heart disease (CCHD), 30 children aged 1–6 yr, scheduled for elective cardiac surgery, were studied. The children were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group I received oral midazolam 0.75 mg · kg^{? 1} 30 min before separation from their parents in the surgical waiting area, and Group II received oral or rectal pentobarbitone 2 mg · kg^{? 1} at 90 min, and morphine 0.2 mg· kg^{? 1} and atropine 0.02 mg· kg^{? 1} im at 60 min before separation. Heart rate, haemoglobin oxygen saturation (SpO₂) and anxiolysis and sedation scores were recorded at four times during the study: at baseline (immediately before premedication), immediately after administration of the premedication, at separation of children from parents in the waiting area and at the time of application of the face mask in the operating room. We found that in Group I, anxiolysis improved at separation from parents compared with baseline (P < 0.05) and sedation increased both at separation and on mask application (P < 0.05), whereas in Group II anxiolysis did not change at any time and sedation increased only at separation (P < 0.05). Intramuscular injection of morphine produced a transient decrease in mean SpO₂ (from 84% to 76%) (P < 0.05) that did not occur after ingestion of oral midazolam. The results of this study indicate that oral midazolam is a safe and effective replacement for the standard premedication for children with CCHD undergoing cardiac surgery and avoids the decrease in SpO₂ associated with im injections.     

枸橼酸钠对先天性心脏病患儿咪达唑仑口服术前用药效果的影响

目的 探讨枸橼酸钠对先天性心脏病患儿咪达唑仑口服术前用药效果的影响.方法 选择拟行房缺修补术、室缺修补术或动脉导管结扎术的患儿40例,年龄2～6岁,体重12～20 kg,ASA分级Ⅱ或Ⅲ级,随机分为2组(n=20):对照组(C组)和枸橼酸钠组(S组).口服术前用药:S组为咪达唑仑0.12 ml/kg、氯胺酮0.12 ml/kg、葡萄糖0.12 ml/kg和枸橼酸钠0.12 ml/kg,等容积混合;C组为咪达唑仑0.12 ml/kg、氯胺酮0.12 ml/kg和葡萄糖0.24 ml/kg,等容积混合.用pH值1.75的盐酸模拟胃液,与两组配置好的药液在体外混合,分别测定两组混合药液的pH值.记录术前焦虑评分,口服术前药(0.48 ml/kg)后,记录咪达唑仑起效时间、镇静评分和与父母分离评分.入室后记录HR、MAP和SpO2,记录患儿对静脉穿刺反应评分和服药后的不良反应发生情况.结果 与盐酸混合后C组药物pH值为1.97,S组为4.52.两组患儿均成功口服术前药物.与C组比较,S组与父母分离评分、镇静评分和静脉穿刺反应评分降低,咪达唑仑起效时间缩短(P＜0.05),术前焦虑评分差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);两组患儿入室时HR、MAP和SpO2均在正常范围.两组患儿在服药后均未出现恶心呕吐、呼吸抑制等不良反应.结论 作为先天性心脏病患儿口服术前用药时,枸橼酸钠可提高药液的pH值,缩短咪达唑仑起效时间,加强镇静效果.     

Perioperative effects of melatonin and midazolam premedication on sedation, orientation, anxiety scores and psychomotor performance

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the perioperative effects of melatonin and midazolam given in premedication, on sedation, orientation, anxiety scores and psychomotor performance. METHODS: Exogenous administration of melatonin not only facilitates the onset of sleep but also improves its quality. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed in 66 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were given melatonin 5 mg, midazolam 15 mg or placebo, 90 min before anaesthesia, sublingually. Sedation, orientation and anxiety were quantified before; 10, 30, 60 and 90 min after premedication; and 15, 30, 60 and 90 min after admission to the recovery room. Neurocognitive performance was evaluated at these times, using the Trail Making A and B and Word Fluency tests. The differences between the groups were analysed by ANOVA. Two-way comparisons were performed by Scheffé analysis. Sedation and amnesia were analysed by the chi2 test. RESULTS: Patients who received premedication with either melatonin or midazolam had a significant increase in sedation and decrease in anxiety before operation compared with controls. After operation, there was no difference in sedation scores of all groups. Whereas, 30, 60 and 90 min after premedication the melatonin and midazolam groups exhibited a significantly poorer performance in Trail Making A and B tests compared with placebo, there were no significant differences among the groups in terms of neuropsychological performance after the operation. Amnesia was notable only in the midazolam group for one preoperative event. CONCLUSION: Melatonin premedication was associated with preoperative anxiolysis and sedation without postoperative impairment of psychomotor performance.     

Premedication with midazolam in young children: a comparison of four routes of administration

BACKGROUND: We undertook a study to determine the effects of four routes of administation on the efficacy of midazolam for premedication. METHODS: In a randomized double-blind study, 119 unmedicated children, ASA I-II, aged 1.5-5 years, who were scheduled for minor elective surgery and who had been planned to received midazolam as a premedicant drug, were randomly assigned to one of four groups. Group I received intranasal midazolam 0.3 mg.kg-1; group II, oral midazolam 0.5 mg x kg(-1); group III, rectal midazolam 0.5 mg x kg(-1); and group IV, sublingual midazolam 0.3 mg x kg(-1). A blinded observer assessed the children for sedation and anxiolysis every 5 min prior to surgery. Quality of mask acceptance for induction, postanaesthesia care unit behaviour and parents' satisfaction were evaluated. Thirty patients were enrolled in each of groups I, III and IV. Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in group II. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in sedation and anxiety levels among the four groups. Average sedation and anxiolysis increased with time, achieving a maximum at 20 min in group I and at 30 min in groups II-IV. Patient mask acceptance was good for more than 75% of the children. Although the intranasal route provides a faster effect, it causes significant nasal irritation. Seventy-seven percent of the children from this group cried after drug administration. Most parents in all groups (67-73%) were satisfied with the premedication. CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal, oral, rectal and sublingual midazolam produces good levels of sedation and anxiolysis. Mask acceptance for inhalation induction was easy in the majority of children, irrespective of the route of drug administration.