Helical tomotherapy for parotid gland tumors

PURPOSE: To investigate helical tomotherapy (HT) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) as a postoperative treatment for parotid gland tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Helical tomotherapy plans were developed for 4 patients previously treated with segmental multileaf collimator (SMLC) IMRT. A primary planning target volume (PTV64) and two secondary PTVs (PTV60, PTV54) were defined. The clinical goals from the SMLC plans were applied as closely as possible to the HT planning. The SMLC plans included bolus, whereas HT plans did not. RESULTS: In general, the HT plans showed better target coverage and target dose homogeneity. The minimum doses to the desired coverage volume were greater, on average, in the HT plans for all the targets. Minimum PTV doses were larger, on average, in the HT plans by 4.6 Gy (p = 0.03), 4.8 Gy (p = 0.06), and 4.9 Gy (p = 0.06) for PTV64, PTV60, and PTV54, respectively. Maximum PTV doses were smaller, on average, by 2.9 Gy (p = 0.23), 3.2 Gy (p = 0.02), and 3.6 Gy (p = 0.03) for PTV64, PTV60, and PTV54, respectively. Average dose homogeneity index was statistically smaller in the HT plans, and conformity index was larger for PTV64 in 3 patients. Tumor control probabilities were higher for 3 of the 4 patients. Sparing of normal structures was comparable for the two techniques. There were no significant differences between the normal tissue complication probabilities for the HT and SMLC plans. CONCLUSIONS: Helical tomotherapy treatment plans were comparable to or slightly better than SMLC plans. Helical tomotherapy is an effective alternative to SMLC IMRT for treatment of parotid tumors.     

Helical tomotherapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in the treatment of early stage prostate cancer: A treatment planning comparison

Purpose

To compare helical tomotherapy (HT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) on early stage prostate cancer treatments delivered with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in moderate hypofractionation.

Material/methods

Eight patients treated with HT were replanned with two-field IMPT (2fIMPT) and five-field IMPT (5fIMPT), using a small pencil beam size (3 mm sigma). The prescribed dose was 74.3 Gy in 28 fractions on PTV1 (prostate) and PTV2 (proximal seminal vesicles), 65.5 Gy on PTV3 (distal seminal vesicles) and on the overlap between rectum and PTVs.

Results

IMPT and HT achieved similar target coverage and dose homogeneity, with 5fIMPT providing the best results. The conformity indexes of IMPT were significantly lower for PTV1+2 and PTV3. Above 65 Gy, HT and IMPT were equivalent in the rectum, while IMPT spared the bladder and the penile bulb from 0 to 70 Gy. From 0 up to 60 Gy, IMPT dosimetric values were (much) lower for all OARs except the femur heads, where HT was better than 2fIMPT in the 25-35 Gy dose range. OARs mean doses were typically reduced by 30-50% by IMPT. NTCPs for the rectum were within 1% between the two techniques, except when the endpoint was stool frequency, where IMPT showed a small (though statistically significant) benefit.

Conclusions

HT and IMPT produce similar dose distributions in the target volume. The current knowledge on dose-effect relations does not allow to quantify the clinical impact of the large sparing of IMPT at medium-to-low doses.     

Sparing the parotid glands and surgically transferred submandibular gland with helical tomotherapy in post-operative radiation of head and neck cancer: a planning study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of sparing the parotid glands and surgically transferred submandibular gland (SMG) by intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in post-operative cases of head and neck cancer (HNC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients (larynx-2, base of tongue-4, tonsil-3, and unknown primary-1; pathologic stages III-IV) who underwent SMG transfers on the side of N0 neck along with definitive surgery were selected for this study. IMRT planning was done retrospectively using helical tomotherapy approach. Planning objective was to deliver 60 Gy to PTV1 and 54 Gy to PTV2 while maintaining the mean dose to the total parotid volume (TPV) and SMG less than 26 Gy. RESULTS: The mean dose (+/-SD) to the TPV and SMG were 25+/-0.6 Gy and 23+/-1.9 Gy, respectively. The D(95) for PTV1 and PTV2 were 59.9+/-0.1 Gy and 54.9+/-0.3 Gy, respectively, satisfying our planning goal for PTV coverage. The D(99) for PTV1 and PTV2 were 58.2+/-0.7 Gy and 49.5+/-2.2 Gy, respectively, showing that sparing the salivary glands did not result in underdosing of the PTVs. CONCLUSIONS: By combining the gland transfer and IMRT, the mean dose to TPV and transferred SMG could be reduced to less than 26 Gy in post-operative patients of HNC.     

Image-guided radiotherapy for cervix cancer: high-tech external beam therapy versus high-tech brachytherapy

PURPOSE: Many studies comparing external-beam therapy (EBT) and brachytherapy (BT) are biased because advanced EBT is compared with conventional BT. This study compares high-tech EBT against high-tech BT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nine patients were selected with locally advanced cervix cancer, representing typical clinical situations according to initial tumor extension and response after EBT. Patients were treated either with intracavitary, combined interstitial/intracavitary, or complex interstitial BT. Gross tumor volume, high-risk clinical target volume (CTV), intermediate-risk CTV, bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were delineated. Magnetic resonance-guided BT planning was manually optimized with respect to organ dose limits. Margins (3 and 5 mm) were added to BT CTVs to construct planning target volumes (PTVs) for EBT. Inversely planned EBT with photons (IMRT) and protons (IMPT) was challenged to deliver the highest possible doses to PTVs while respecting D(1cc) and D(2cc) limits from BT, assuming the same fractionation (4 x 7 Gy). The D90 for target structures and normal tissue volumes receiving fractionated doses between 3 and 7 Gy were compared. RESULTS: High-risk CTV doses depended on the clinical situation and radiation quality. If IMRT was limited to D(2cc) and D(1cc) from BT, the D90 for high-risk PTV and intermediate-risk PTV was mostly lower. Volumes receiving 60 Gy (in equivalent dose in 20 Gy fractions) were approximately twice as large for IMRT compared with BT. For IMPT, this volume ratio was lower. Planning target volume doses of IMPT plans with 3-mm margins were comparable to those with BT. Gross tumor volume doses were mostly lower for both IMRT and IMPT. CONCLUSION: For benchmarking high-tech EBT, high-tech BT techniques have to be used. For cervix cancer boost treatments, both IMRT and IMPT seem to be inferior to advanced BT.     

Quantification of trade-off between parotid gland sparing and planning target volume underdosages in clinically node-negative head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To quantify the trade-off between parotid gland sparing and planning target volume (PTV) underdosages for head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A planning study was performed for 4 patients with either soft palate or tonsil tumors treated with external radiotherapy up to 46 Gy. The trade-off between underdosages in the PTV and sparing of the parotid glands was investigated by systematically varying the optimization objectives for the inverse planning. A new way of presenting dose-volume information allows easy detection of small PTV subvolumes with underdosages that cannot be assessed in conventional cumulative dose-volume histograms. A simple radiobiological model to estimate the control probability for an electively irradiated neck level was developed. RESULTS: The average dose to the parotid glands can decrease by >10 Gy by allowing the PTV to be underdosed in such a way that the radiobiological model predicts a decrease in subclinical disease control probability of (typically) 1% to a few percent. CONCLUSION: The trade-off between parotid gland sparing and underdosages in the PTV has been quantified by the use of an alternative method to present dose-volume information and by the use of a radiobiological model to predict subclinical disease control probability.     

The dose to the parotid glands with IMRT for oropharyngeal tumors: the effect of reduction of positioning margins.

PURPOSE: The aim of this paper is to quantify the importance of the reduction of positioning margins applied to the clinical target volume (CTV) on the dose distribution of the parotid gland for different intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) strategies for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: CTVs and organs at risk were delineated in the planning computed tomographic (CT) scans of three patients. Margins of 0, 3, 6 and 9mm were applied to the CTVs in order to obtain the planning target volumes (PTVs). Three IMRT strategies were used to optimize the dose distribution. RESULTS: The analysis of the three IMRT strategies resulted in: (1) an optimal dose distribution in the PTV; (2) optimal dose distribution in the PTV while sparing the parotid gland and (3) more parotid gland sparing but at expense of the dose homogeneity in the PTV. The mean parotid dose increased linearly with increasing margin by approximately 1.3Gy per mm. As a result, the normal complication probability (NTCP) for xerostomia decreased when smaller margins were applied. Reducing the margin from 6 to 3mm resulted in an NTCP reduction of approximately 20%. CONCLUSION: Reducing the CTV-PTV margin by improving the patient position accuracy may lead to a significant reduction of NTCP for the IMRT treatment of the oropharyngeal tumors and lymph nodes level II.     

Feasibility of non-coplanar tomotherapy for lung cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy

To quantify the dosimetric gains from non-coplanar helical tomotherapy (HT) arcs for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of lung cancer, we created oblique helical arcs by rotating patient's CT images. Ten, 20 and 30 degrees of yaws were introduced in the treatment planning for a patient with a hypothetical lung tumor at the upper, middle and lower portion of the right lung, and the upper and middle left lung. The planning target volume (PTV) was 43 cm(3). 60 Gy was prescribed to the PTV. Dose to organs at risk (OARs), which included the lungs, heart, spinal cord and chest wall, was optimized using a 2.5 cm jaw, 0.287 pitch and modulation factor of 2.5. Composite plans were generated by dose summation of the resultant plans. These plans were evaluated for its conformity index (R(x)) and percentile volume of lung receiving radiation dose of x Gy (V(x)). Conformity index was defined by the ratio of x percent isodose volume and PTV. The results show that combination of non-coplanar arcs reduced R(50) by 4.5%, R(20) by 26% and R(10) by 30% on average. Non-coplanar arcs did not affect V(20) but reduced V(10) and V(5) by 10% and 24% respectively. Composite of the non-coplanar arcs also reduced maximum dose to the spinal cord by 20-39%. Volume of chest wall receiving higher than 30 Gy was reduced by 48% on average. Heart dose reduction was dependent on the location of the PTV and the choice of non-coplanar orientations. Therefore we conclude that non-coplanar HT arcs significantly improve critical organ sparing in lung SBRT without changing the PTV dose coverage.     

Implementation of HybridArc treatment technique in preoperative radiotherapy of rectal cancer: dose patterns in target lesions and organs at risk as compared to helical Tomotherapy and RapidArc

ABSTRACT: Purpose. HybridArc is a novel treatment technique blending aperture-enhanced optimized arcs with discrete IMRT-elements, allowing selection of arcs with a set of static IMRT-beams. This study compared this new technique to helical tomotherapy, and RapidArc, in preoperative radiotherapy of rectal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve rectal cancer patients treated consecutively with Tomotherapy Hi-Art II system were simulated with HybridArc and RapidArc. Treatment plans were designed to deliver a homogeneous dose of 46.0Gy to mesorectum and draining lymph nodes, with a simultaneous-integrated-boost to the primary tumor up to a total dose of 55.2Gy. Planning objectives were 95% of prescribed dose to 95% of PTVs, while minimizing the volume of small bowel receiving more than 15Gy (V15) and the mean bladder dose. Dose gradient towards simultaneous-integrated-boost (GI), calculated by dividing the volume receiving more then 52.4Gy (95% of PTV55.2Gy) to the volume of PTV55.2Gy, was kept below 1.5. Mean beam-on time and amount of MUs were also analyzed. RESULTS: PTVs were adequately covered by all plans. Significant advantage was found for Tomotherapy in sparing small bowel (V15=112.7cm3 SD73.4cm3) compared to RapidArc (133.4cm3 SD75.3cm3) and HybridArc (143.7cm3 SD74.4cm3) (p<0.01). The mean bladder dose was better with RapidArc (20.6Gy SD2.2Gy) compared to HybridArc (24.2Gy SD4.3Gy) and Tomotherapy (23.0Gy SD4.7Gy) (p<0.01). The mean beam-on time was significantly lower (p<0.01) for HybridArc (2.7min SD0.8) and RapidArc (2.5min SD0.5) compared to Tomotherapy (11.0min SD0.7). The total amount of MUs was significantly (p<0.01) lower for RapidArc (547 SD44) compared to HybridArc (949 SD153). CONCLUSIONS: HybridArc is a feasible solution for preoperative RT with a simultaneous-integrated-boost in rectal cancer patients. It achieved similar PTV coverage with significant lower beam-on time, but less efficient in sparing small bowel and bladder compared to Tomotherapy and RapidArc. The added value of HybridArc is that the treatment modality can be implemented on every LINAC equipped with Dynamic-Conform-Arc and IMRT treatment techniques, while maintaining the same QA-schemes.     

Geometric factors influencing dosimetric sparing of the parotid glands using IMRT

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between the parotid volume, parotid-planning target volume (PTV) overlap, and dosimetric sparing of the parotid with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Parotid data were collected retrospectively for 51 patients treated with simultaneous boost IMRT. Unresectable patients received 54 or 59.4 Gy to subclinical disease, 70 Gy to gross disease. Patients treated postoperatively received 54, 60, and 66 Gy to low-risk, high-risk, and tumor bed regions. Volume and mean dose of each gland and gland segments outside of and overlapping the PTV were collected. Proximity of each gland to each PTV was recorded. RESULTS: Dosimetric sparing (mean dose 21% overlap (p = <0.0001). Among spared glands, the median mean dose in the overlap region was 55.0 Gy in glands with < or =21% overlap, but only 45.4 Gy when overlap >21%. Median mean dose was 25.9 Gy to glands overlapping PTV(54) or PTV(59) alone and 30.0 Gy to those abutting PTV(70) (p < 0.001). Although proximity to PTV(70) was associated with higher parotid dose, satisfactory sparing was achieved in 24 of 43 ipsilateral glands. CONCLUSIONS: Dosimetric sparing of the parotid is feasible when the parotid-PTV overlap is less than approximately 20%. With more overlap, sparing may result in low doses within the overlap region, possibly leading to inadequate PTV coverage. Gland proximity to the high-dose PTV is associated with higher mean dose but does not always preclude dosimetric sparing.     

Dosimetric comparisons of helical tomotherapy and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE: The study evaluates and quantifies the potential dosimetric gains of helical tomotherapy (HT) versus step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SaS-IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty consecutive NPC patients curatively treated by HT were examined. Each case was planned by HT and SaS-IMRT (ADAC Pinnacle(3)) planning system, respectively. Dose plans were compared using dose volume histograms (DVH), conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and minimal dose to 1cc (D(min_1cc)) of the planned target volume (PTV) and a comprehensive quality index (CQI) of ten organs at risk (OARs). The prescribed dose/fractionation was 72Gy to the PTV, 64.8Gy to the elective PTV, and 54Gy to the clinically negative neck region. The plan of 54Gy to the PTV (PTV(54)) was used to evaluate the CI and HI in the target. The cumulative doses of the three PTV plans to the OARs were calculated. RESULTS: We observed the HT plans significantly improved the CI (improvement ratio: 11.9+/-5.5%) and HI (improvement ratio: 8.8+/-1.5%) of the PTV(54) compared with SaS-IMRT plans. In addition, the mean/maximal dose of most of the OARs except chiasm was significantly reduced in HT plans, with the CQI of 0.92+/-0.08. A negative result of HT in chiasm was observed but only significantly revealed in cases without skull base infiltration. CONCLUSIONS: A dosimetric gain in CI and HI of PTV and sparing of OARs was significantly obtained in HT versus SaS-IMRT plans in NPC patients. Whether such dosimetric superiority in HT could transfer into clinical advantages needs further investigation.     

食管癌螺旋断层放疗及三维适形调强放疗计划剂量学研究

目的 近年来放射治疗设备不断更新,放疗技术持续发展,肿瘤放疗方式有了更多的选择.本研究通过评估食管癌的螺旋断层放疗(tomotherapy, TOMO)及三维适形调强放疗(intensity modulation radiation therapy, IMRT)的剂量学特性,为临床上食管癌放疗方式的选择提供依据.方法 选取2014-07-13-2015-02-25浙江省肿瘤医院胸部肿瘤放疗科10例食管癌患者,勾画靶区及正常器官后,分别传输至Raystation及TOMO计划系统,给予肿瘤原发灶(PGTV)61.6 Gy/28次,计划靶区(PTV)56.0 Gy/28次,根据RTOG 1106标准限制危及器官(organs at risk, OAR)剂量.分别对靶区的剂量体积直方图(dose volume histogram, DVH)、均匀性指数(homogeneity index, HI)、适形性指数(conformal index CI)和OAR(肺、心脏、脊髓)受照最大剂量及平均剂量进行评估.结果 两种计划都能满足处方剂量要求和危及器官受量限制.TOMO计划中PGTV的中位均匀性指数(HI)为0.057 5,优于IMRT计划的0.073 5, P=0.047.TOMO计划中PTV的中位适形性指数(CI)为0.785,优于IMRT计划的0.682 5, P=0.009.TOMO计划中PGTV的中位最大剂量Dmax为64.9 Gy,明显低于IMRT计划的66.5 Gy, P=0.005;TOMO计划中PTV的中位最大剂量Dmax为64.1 Gy,明显低于IMRT计划的64.9 Gy, P=0.028. TOMO计划的中位总的肺剂量为10.8 Gy,低于IMRT计划的11.9 Gy, P=0.005.TOMO计划的中位总的心脏剂量为22.6 Gy,明显低于IMRT计划的24.3 Gy, P=0.028. TOMO计划的中位脊髓最大剂量为40.2 Gy,明显低于IMRT计划的41.7 Gy, P=0.007.结论 食管癌放疗中TOMO放疗计划对比IMRT放疗计划,具有更好的靶区覆盖适形性及剂量分布均匀性,同时明显减少双肺、心脏及脊髓的受照剂量.     

Dose–volume and biological-model based comparison between helical tomotherapy and (inverse-planned) IMAT for prostate tumours

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Helical tomotherapy (HT) and intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) are two arc-based approaches to the delivery of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Through plan comparisons we have investigated the potential of IMAT, both with constant (conventional or IMAT-C) and variable (non-conventional or IMAT-NC, a theoretical exercise) dose-rate, to serve as an alternative to helical tomotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six patients with prostate tumours treated by HT with a moderately hypo-fractionated protocol, involving a simultaneous integrated boost, were re-planned as IMAT treatments. A method for IMAT inverse-planning using a commercial module for static IMRT combined with a multi-leaf collimator (MLC) arc-sequencing was developed. IMAT plans were compared to HT plans in terms of dose statistics and radiobiological indices. RESULTS: Concerning the planning target volume (PTV), the mean doses for all PTVs were similar for HT and IMAT-C plans with minimum dose, target coverage, equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and tumour control probability (TCP) values being generally higher for HT; maximum dose and degree of heterogeneity were instead higher for IMAT-C. In relation to organs at risk, mean doses and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) values were similar between the two modalities, except for the penile bulb where IMAT was significantly better. Re-normalizing all plans to the same rectal toxicity (NTCP=5%), the HT modality yielded higher TCP than IMAT-C but there was no significant difference between HT and IMAT-NC. The integral dose with HT was higher than that for IMAT. CONCLUSIONS: with regards to the plan analysis, the HT is superior to IMAT-C in terms of target coverage and dose homogeneity within the PTV. Introducing dose-rate variation during arc-rotation, not deliverable with current linac technology, the simulations result in comparable plan indices between (IMAT-NC) and HT.     

Conformal external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of anal canal carcinoma: A retrospective study of a genital organ sparing technique

To investigate and compare the dosimetric distribution of a conventional radiotherapy (CRT) technique and a genital organ sparing three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) technique for the treatment of anal canal cancer. Twenty‐four patients with anal canal cancer treated between January 2002 and December 2006 were investigated. Each patient was retrospectively planned with the CRT and 3DCRT techniques using the Eclipse planning system (version 7.3, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Planning target volumes (PTVs) and surrounding organs at risk were contoured. Organs at risk included the bladder, bowel, femoral head and neck, and external genitalia. The two planning approaches were compared using dose volume histograms. Dose volume histograms of the PTV pelvis and PTV inguinal showed comparable PTV coverage between the two techniques. The mean percentage volumes of the PTV pelvis and PTV inguinal receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose was greater than 99% and 91.5%, respectively. Dose volume histograms of the external genitalia demonstrated that they were well spared by the 3DCRT technique with mean doses of 28.30 and 13.17 Gy for the CRT and 3DCRT techniques, respectively. The percentage volume of bowel and bladder receiving 35 Gy or less was reduced with the 3DCRT technique. The femoral head and neck doses were comparable between the two techniques, with average maximum doses recorded of 40.60 and 40.69 Gy. The results of this study demonstrate that the 3DCRT technique achieves significant sparing of surrounding organs at risk, particularly the external genitalia. This organ at risk sparing was accomplished while achieving comparable PTV coverage with a CRT technique.     

Analysis of dose distribution in the 'Rind'--a volume outside the PTV--in 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy of non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Appropriate planning target volume (PTV) definition is critical for local disease eradication in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). When margins are added to the gross tumour volume (GTV) in the standard way, the PTV formed may be too large to facilitate dose escalation due to normal tissue tolerance. To increase the feasibility of dose escalation with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), this study examines an alternative method for the formation of the PTV in NSCLC. This strategy is based on the reduced probability of tumour cells from the GTV outwards and on the associated lower dose requirements to eradicate such subclinical disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3DCRT plans were generated from the CT scans of 15 patients with NSCLC (stages Ib to IIIb). Each PTV was formed by adding a margin for geometric uncertainties directly onto the GTV. The success of this approach is dependent on the volume immediately outside this smaller PTV, the Rind volume, receiving 50 Gy, the minimum dose requirement that is considered sufficient for eradication of the reduced tumour cell density in this volume. While optimizing the treatment plans for each PTV to 70 Gy, the dose distribution in the Rind volume, and the factors affecting it, were assessed. RESULTS: One hundred percent of each PTV received a minimum of 95% of the prescribed dose. The percentage of the Rind volume receiving 50 Gy or more (V50) had a median value of 94%. The minimum dose in this volume, however, ranged from 5.6 to 32.1 Gy. The V50 was highest for apical tumours (96.1%) and lowest for peripheral tumours (86%) and correlated positively with the size of the PTV (Kendall's rank correlation (Kt)=+0.3, P=0.05) and the number of beams used (Kt=+0.3, P=0.03) but not with the conformity index. The average volume outside the Rind which still received >/=50 Gy (the Wasted 50 Gy) increased significantly with the V50 of the Rind volume and was inversely proportional to the Rind <50 Gy, correlating significantly with the dose to the organs at risk. CONCLUSIONS: Using this strategy with standard 3DCRT, all PTVs were irradiated to the required dose with this approach, but none of the corresponding Rind volumes had an acceptable dose distribution. The addition of dual volume planning or the use of intensity modulated radiation therapy may achieve an appropriate dose distribution in the Rind volume while not increasing the dose to the organs at risk and may thereby facilitate dose escalation.     

鼻咽癌螺旋断层放疗与常规加速器调强放疗的剂量学比较

目的 通过比较鼻咽癌螺旋断层放疗与常规直线加速器静态调强治疗计划,研究其剂量学特性.方法 选10例鼻咽癌患者的CT图像,统一勾画靶区及正常器官后,分别传输至螺旋断层放疗、常规调强放疗逆向调强计划系统.统一给予肿瘤靶区(pGTV、PTVnd)处方剂量70 Gy分33次,亚临床病灶区(PTV1)60 Gy分33次,预防照射区(PTV2)54 Gy分33次.正常器官限制体积与剂量为腮腺V35＜50%,脑干＜54 Gy,脊髓＜45 Gy,晶体＜9 Gy等.对两组数据进行配对t检验.结果 两组计划均有较好靶区处方剂量分布,但螺旋断层放疗组的均匀性好于常规调强放疗组;PTV1平均剂量(63.84 Gy)也显著低于常规调强放疗组(70.30 Gy);腮腺平均剂量较常规常规调强放疗组低5.3Gy,V30及V35显著低于常规调强放疗组;喉-气管-食管的最大剂量也较常规调强放疗组明显降低.结论 在鼻咽癌调强放疗中,螺旋断层放疗较常规直线加速器静态调强放疗有更好的剂量均匀性及更陡峭的剂量梯度,并可更好地保护正常器官.     

Comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, adaptive radiotherapy, proton radiotherapy, and adaptive proton radiotherapy for treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer

Background and purpose

Various radiotherapy planning methods for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) have been proposed to decrease normal tissue toxicity. We compare IMRT, adaptive IMRT, proton therapy (IMPT), and adaptive IMPT for SCCHN.

Materials and methods

Initial and re-simulation CT images from 10 consecutive patients with SCCHN were used to quantify dosimetric differences between photon and proton therapy. Contouring was performed on both CTs, and plans (n = 40 plans) and dose-volume histograms were generated.

Results

The mean GTV volume decreased 53.4% with re-simulation. All plans provided comparable PTV coverage. Compared with IMRT, adaptive IMRT significantly reduced the maximum dose to the mandible (p = 0.020) and mean doses to the contralateral parotid gland (p = 0.049) and larynx (p = 0.049). Compared with IMRT and adaptive IMRT, IMPT significantly lowered the maximum doses to the spinal cord (p < 0.002 for both) and brainstem (p < 0.002 for both) and mean doses to the larynx (p < 0.002 for both) and ipsilateral (p = 0.004 IMRT, p = 0.050 adaptive) and contralateral (p < 0.002 IMRT, p = 0.010 adaptive) parotid glands. Adaptive IMPT significantly reduced doses to all critical structures compared with IMRT and adaptive IMRT and several critical structures compared with non-adaptive IMPT.

Conclusions

Although adaptive IMRT reduced dose to several normal structures compared with standard IMRT, non-adaptive proton therapy had a more favorable dosimetric profile than IMRT or adaptive IMRT and may obviate the need for adaptive planning. Protons allowed significant sparing of the spinal cord, parotid glands, larynx, and brainstem and should be considered for SCCHN to decrease normal tissue toxicity while still providing optimal tumor coverage.     

Simultaneous integrated boost technique by helical tomotherapy for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme with 11C-methionine PET: report of three cases

We performed hypofractionated high-dose irradiation of a patient’s residual glioblastoma multiforme using a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique with helical tomotherapy system (HT) planning. The gross tumor volume (GTV)-1 was defined as the area of intensive ¹¹C-methionine (MET) uptake and GTV-2 was defined as the area of moderate MET uptake. The planning target volume (PTV)-1 encompassed GTV-1 plus a 5 mm margin, and PTV-2 encompassed GTV-2 plus a 2 mm margin. SIB with HT was performed in eight fractions, planning the dose for GTV-1 at 68 Gy (biologically effective dose: BED = 126 Gy), PTV-1 at 56 Gy (BED = 95 Gy), and PTV-2 at 40 Gy (BED = 60 Gy). In each of the target areas, the uptake value on ¹¹C-methionine positron emission tomography (MET-PET) was considerably decreased following SIB, although no remarkable changes were demonstrated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These cases demonstrate that SIB with HT planning using MET-PET offers excellent target coverage and uniformity. In addition, SIB with HT planning using MET-PET is organ sparing and MET-PET has great efficacy for monitoring treatment response after SIB. To more clearly define the impact of SIB with HT planning using MET-PET, further investigations are required.     

Dosimetric study of optimal beam number and arrangement for treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intensity‐modulated radiation therapy

The purpose of this dosimetric study was to evaluate the effect of beam number and arrangement on the dose distribution with intensity‐modulated radiation therapy in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer. Computed tomography data sets of seven patients who were treated for nasopharyngeal carcinoma at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre were used for the present dosimetric study. The dose planned was 70 Gy in 7 weeks for the gross nasopharyngeal and nodal disease and the biological equivalents of 60 Gy in 6 weeks for the high‐risk and 50 Gy in 5 weeks for the low‐risk nodal disease. A plan using seven fields was compared to that using nine fields in all patients. Plans were assessed on the dose to the planning target volume (PTV) and the degree of parotid sparing achieved by evaluating both dose?volume histograms (DVH) and axial slices. Seven fields (three anterior and four posterior) provide good PTV coverage and satisfactory parotid sparing in patients with localized nasopharyngeal lesions. Nine fields appear to be better for tumours with significant posterolateral parapharyngeal extension. Parotid sparing is consistently better with nine fields. Both DVH and axial slices need to be evaluated before accepting any plan.     

Craniospinal irradiation using helical tomotherapy: evaluation of acute toxicity and dose distribution

The purpose of this study was to evaluate acute toxicity of craniospinal irradiation (CSI) using helical tomotherapy (HT) and compare its dose distribution with that of conventional linac-based plans. Twelve patients with various brain tumors were treated with HT-CSI. Median patient age was 14 years (range: 4-37 years). Median CSI dose was 30.6 Gy in 18 fractions (range: 23.4-40 Gy in 13-25 fractions). Toxicities were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Before CSI, 11 patients (92%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, so acute toxicity was evaluated by comparing patient status before and after CSI. HT-CSI plans were compared with linac-based CSI plans made using Pinnacle(3) planning system in 9 patients. All patients completed planned CSI without interruption. Grade 3 or higher toxicities were leukopenia seen in 11 patients (92%), anorexia in 6 (50%), anemia in 5 (42%), and thrombopenia in 5 (42%). Administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, platelet transfusion and total parenteral nutrition were required in 8 (67%), 5 (42%) and 5 (42%) patients, respectively. HT plans were superior to linac-based plans in terms of homogeneity and conformality in planning target volume (PTV). For most organs at risk (OARs), volumes receiving more than 10 Gy (V10 Gy) or 20 Gy (V20 Gy) were lower in HT plans. However, HT plans significantly increased mean doses to the lung, kidneys and liver, and V5 Gy of 6 OARs including the lung. Despite intensive neoadjuvant chemotherapy, acute toxicity of HT-CSI was acceptable. HT provided better dose distribution in PTV than conventional linac. In most OARs, smaller volumes received >10-20 Gy in HT plans, although larger volumes received 5-10 Gy.     

A four-dimensional CT-based evaluation of techniques for gastric irradiation

PURPOSE: To evaluate three-dimensional conformal (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated (IMRT) and respiration-gated radiotherapy (RGRT) techniques for gastric irradiation for target coverage and minimization of renal doses. All techniques were four-dimensional (4D)-CT based, incorporating the intrafractional mobility of the target volume and organs at risk (OAR). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The stomach, duodenal C-loop, and OAR (kidneys, liver, and heart) were contoured in all 10 phases of planning 4D-CT scans for five patients who underwent abdominal radiotherapy. Planning target volumes (PTVs) encompassing all positions of the stomach (PTV(all phases)) were generated. Three respiratory phases for RGRT in inspiration and expiration were identified, and corresponding PTV(inspiration) and PTV(expiration) and OAR volumes were created. Landmark-based fields recommended for the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 99-04 study protocol were simulated to assess PTV coverage. IMRT and 3D-CRT planning with and without additional RGRT planning were performed for all PTVs, and corresponding dose volume histograms were analyzed. RESULTS: Use of landmark-based fields did not result in full geometric coverage of the PTV(all phases) in any patient. IMRT significantly reduced mean renal doses compared with 3D-CRT (15.0 Gy +/- 0.9 Gy vs. 20.1 Gy +/- 9.3 Gy and 16.6 Gy +/- 1.5 Gy vs. 32.6 Gy +/- 7.1 Gy for the left and right kidneys, respectively; p = 0.04). No significant increase in renal sparing was seen when adding RGRT to either 3D-CRT or IMRT. Tolerance doses to the other OAR were not exceeded. CONCLUSIONS: Individualized field margins are essential for gastric irradiation. IMRT plans significantly reduce renal doses, but the benefits of RGRT in gastric irradiation appear to be limited.