Diagnosis and classification of myelodysplastic syndrome: International Working Group on Morphology of myelodysplastic syndrome (IWGM-MDS) consensus proposals for the definition and enumeration of myeloblasts and ring sideroblasts

The classification of myelodysplastic syndromes is based on the morphological criteria proposed by the French-American-British (FAB) and World Health Organization (WHO) groups. Accurate enumeration of blast cells, although essential for diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome and for assignment to prognostic groups, is often difficult, due to imprecise criteria for the morphological definition of blasts and promyelocytes. An International Working Group on Morphology of Myelodysplastic Syndrome (IWGM-MDS) of hematopathologists and hematologists expert in the field of myelodysplastic syndrome reviewed the morphological features of bone marrows from all subtypes of myelodysplastic syndrome and agreed on a set of recommendations, including recommendations for the definition and enumeration of blast cells and ring sideroblasts. It is recommended that (1) agranular or granular blast cells be defined (replacing the previous type I, II and III blasts), (2) dysplastic promyelocytes be distinguished from cytologically normal promyelocytes and from granular blast cells, (3) sufficient cells be counted to give a precise blast percentage, particularly at thresholds that are important for diagnosis or prognosis and (4) ring sideroblasts be defined as erythroblasts in which there are a minimum of 5 siderotic granules covering at least a third of the nuclear circumference. Clear definitions and a differential count of a sufficient number of cells is likely to improve precision in the diagnosis and classification of myelodysplastic syndrome. Recommendations should be applied in the context of the WHO classification.     

Comparison of genetic and clinical aspects in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes all with more than 50% of bone marrow erythropoietic cells

Background

The World Health Organization separates acute erythroid leukemia (erythropoiesis in ≥50% of nucleated bone marrow cells; ≥20% myeloblasts of non-erythroid cells) from other entities with increased erythropoiesis – acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (≥20% myeloblasts of all nucleated cells) or myelodysplastic syndromes – and subdivides acute erythroid leukemia into erythroleukemia and pure erythroid leukemia subtypes. We aimed to investigate the biological/genetic justification for the different categories of myeloid malignancies with increased erythropoiesis (≥50% of bone marrow cells).

Design and Methods

We investigated 212 patients (aged 18.5–88.4 years) with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes characterized by 50% or more erythropoiesis: 108 had acute myeloid leukemia (77 with acute erythroid leukemia, corresponding to erythroid/myeloid erythroleukemia, 7 with pure erythroid leukemia, 24 with acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes) and 104 had myelodysplastic syndromes. Morphological and chromosome banding analyses were performed in all cases; subsets of cases were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction and immunophenotyping.

Results

Unfavorable karyotypes were more frequent in patients with acute myeloid leukemia than in those with myelodysplastic syndromes (42.6% versus 13.5%; P<0.0001), but their frequency did not differ significantly between patients with acute erythroid leukemia (39.0%), pure erythroid leukemia (57.1%), and acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (50.0%). The incidence of molecular mutations did not differ significantly between the different categories. The 2-year overall survival rate was better for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes than for those with acute myeloid leukemia (P<0.0001), without significant differences across the different acute leukemia subtypes. The 2-year overall survival rate was worse in patients with unfavorable karyotypes than in those with intermediate risk karyotypes (P<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, only myelodysplastic syndromes versus acute myeloid leukemia (P=0.021) and cytogenetic risk category (P=0.002) had statistically significant effects on overall survival.

Conclusions

The separation of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes with 50% or more erythropoietic cells has clinical relevance, but it might be worth discussing whether to replace the subclassifications of different subtypes of acute erythroid leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes by the single entity, acute myeloid leukemia with increased erythropoiesis ≥50%.     

The WHO classification of MDS does make a difference

The purpose of this study was to determine the facility and reliability of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) with several observers reviewing the same diagnostic specimens. We also wanted to determine if the WHO classification provided additional information about predictability of clinical response outcome. To accomplish these goals we reviewed 103 previously diagnosed cases of low-risk MDS. We found 92% interobserver agreement (P <.001). Sixty-four of these patients had been entered into clinical trials using growth factors by the Nordic MDS Study Group. The WHO classification reliably predicted therapeutic response to the combination of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and erythropoietin (Epo). The response rate differed significantly between refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts (RARS) and refractory anemia with multilineage dysplasia and ringed sideroblasts (RCMD/RS) with regard to therapeutic response (75% versus 9%; P =.003). Also, in the group of patients with less than 5% marrow blasts, there was a difference in median survival between patients with unilineage dysplasia (51% surviving at 67 months) and those with multilineage dysplasia (median survival, 28.5 months; P =.03).     

Peripheral blood neutrophil morphology reflects bone marrow dysplasia in myelodysplastic syndromes

Dysplastic features of cells in peripheral blood and bone marrow were studied in 51 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) to evaluate the significance of the degree of neutrophil granulation (G-score) and the percentage of pelgeroid polymorphs (ppp) in the peripheral blood, as indices of dysplastic changes in the bone marrow. There was a good correlation between peripheral blood and bone marrow findings, both for G-score figures (r = 0.92, P < 0.01) and ppp (r = 0.82, P < 0.01). Significantly lower G-score figures were found among patients with an increased percentage of bone marrow blasts (P < 0.05), while high ppp correlated with the presence of ring sideroblasts, the degree of bone marrow fibrosis, and findings of complex chromosomal abnormalities. Patients with a high degree of bone marrow dysplasia had significantly lower G-score (P < 0.01) and significantly higher ppp (P < 0.05) figures, than those with less pronounced myelodysplasia. In addition, extreme hypogranulation (G-score <150) or very high ppp (≥20%) was generally a sign of bi- and tri-lineage dysplasia in the bone marrow. The results thus show that quantitative estimation of peripheral blood polymorph dysplasia by G-score figures and ppp seems to reflect the total degree of bone marrow dysplasia in MDS and may serve as a complement to bone marrow evaluation when the diagnosis of MDS is difficult. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

The myelodysplastic syndromes: classification and prognosis

Myelodysplastic syndrome is a neoplastic clonal stem cell disorder characterized clinically by bone marrow failure and a tendency to progress to acute myelogenous leukemia. Dysplasia is the pathologic hallmark. The French-American-British classification served as the gold standard for more than two decades. Under the auspice of the World Health Organization, more than 100 hematopathologists in a 3-year cumulative effort issued the new World Health Organization classification, which recognizes multilineage dysplasia. Refractory anemia with excess blasts is divided into two groups. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia is reclassified under a separate category. Refractory anemia with excess blasts in the transformation group was omitted. Finally, 5q-syndrome is a new subgroup. In addition to the pathologic classification, various prognostic predictors were formatted into scoring systems. Bone marrow blast percentage, cytopenias, and cytogenetics are the backbone for those prognostic models. The International Prognostic Scoring System is a product of pooled data from previous scoring systems and a useful tool to predict survival and acute myelogenous leukemia evolution. This paper discusses the classification and prognosis of myelodysplastic syndromes and their evolution.     

Deficiency of pluripotent hemopoietic progenitor cells in myelodysplastic syndromes

Summary Pluripotent (CFU-MIX), erythroid (BFU-E) and granulocyte/macrophage (CFU-GM) progenitor cells were examined in bone marrow (BM) from 23 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Patients were grouped according to the FAB classification: Refractory anemia (RA), n=3; RA with ring sideroblasts (RARS), n=3; RA with excess of blasts (RAEB), n=8; RA with excess of blasts in transformation (RAEBt), n=7; chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), n=2. In FAB groups RA, RARS, RAEB and RAEBt CFU-GM concentrations were normal or decreased but both CMML-patients had increased CFU-GM values. Abnormal cluster growth was observed in 9 of 23 MDS-patients. BFU-E colony formation was subnormal in all cases. Mixed-colony assay values were at the lower limit of controls in one patient and decreased in the remaining 22 MDS-patients. A similar growth pattern of hemopoietic progenitor cells was observed in 19 patients with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL), who were studied for comparison. These data suggest a quantitative or qualitative/functional defect of the pluripotent progenitor cell compartment as the major cause for the cytopenia in MDS-patients.     

The effect of stem-cell factor,interleukin-3 and erythropoietin on in vitro erythropoiesis in myelodysplastic syndromes

An inherent defect of erythroid differentiation at the colony-forming unit blast (CFU-blast) compartment and (or) an impaired response of early erythroid progenitors (BFU-E) to growth stimulation are both considered to contribute to anemia in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). With the intention of improving survival and growth of early erythroid progenitors we investigated the effect of stem-cell factor (SCF) and interleukin-3 (IL-3) alone and in combination with erythropoietin, on the in vitro erythropoiesis of 13 patients with MDS and of three normal controls. SCF and IL-3 alone did not promote erythroid colony growth in MDS, while 3 cases responded to erythropoietin alone. In each of these, BFU-E colony growth could be increased by SCF, which was also found in all normal bone marrows. Altogether 6 cases showed a significant enhancement of BFU-E colony numbers by the combination of SCF and erythropoietin as compared to erythropoietin alone (P=0.036). Out of the 6 responding cases, 5 belonged to the FAB-classified subgroups refractory anemia (RA) and refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts (RA/RS) (5/5), while 1 patient was classified as having refractory anemia with excess of blasts (RAEB) (1/4). No patient with refractory anemia with excess of blasts in transformation (RAEB-T) (0/4) responded. In spite of these positive effects, the absolute number of BFU-E colonies remained reduced in all MDS cases when compared to normal controls. IL-3 proved ineffective in increasing the response to erythropoietin in MDS although it increased erythropoietin-induced BFU-E formation in normal controls significantly. We conclude that the striking synergistic effect of SCF and erythropoietin on erythroid colony formation seen with normal bone marrow is conserved in most cases with RA and RA/RS. In RAEB and RAEB-T the intrinsic defect of the erythroid differentiation pathway cannot be overcome by SCF.Abbreviation MDS myelodysplastic syndrome - SCF stem-cell factor - II-3 interleukin-3 - RA refractory anemia - RA/RS RA with ringed sideroblasts - RAEB RA with excess of blasts - RAEB-T RA with excess of blasts in transformation - Epo erythropoietin     

The clinical implications of the World Health Organization's classification of myelodysplastic syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of neoplastic clonal stem cell diseases characterized by dysplastic morphological features with a varying percentage of leukemic blasts and clinical bone marrow failure. The French-American-British (FAB) system served as the gold standard of MDS classification for more than two decades. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification, built on the backbone of the FAB classification, is an attempt to further improve the prognostic value of MDS classification as well as to establish its clinical utility as a tool to select different treatments. In this article we highlight the major differences between the FAB classification and the WHO MDS classification. We discuss in more details the experience of using the new WHO classification since its publications and review the studies that tried to either validate the prognostic value of the new classification or apply it to predict clinical responses to various treatments.     

Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome with monosomy 5 after successful treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (M2)

We describe a patient who developed myelodysplastic syndrome over 2 years after achieving complete remission of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The patient was treated in July 1998 with anthracycline, etoposide, and behenoyl cytarabine chemotherapy for AML (French-American-British classification, M2; World Health Organization classification, AML with maturation) and achieved complete remission. At presentation, no chromosomal abnormalities were detected. In December 2000, the patient's peripheral blood revealed pancytopenia, and his bone marrow was hypocellular with trilineage myelodysplasia and no blasts. Chromosomal analysis revealed complex karyotypic abnormalities, including monosomy 5. The patient was diagnosed with high-grade myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB) subtype. The pancytopenia progressed rapidly, and he died 2 months after the diagnosis of MDS. Therapy-related MDS and AML (t-MDS/t-AML) developing after treatment for acute leukemia is unusual; the primary leukemia associated with most cases of t-MDS/t-AML is acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). This unusual case suggests that AML excluding APL should be considered a primary hematologic malignancy for t-MDS/t-AML.     

The hematopathological basis for studying effects of the demethylating agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine) in myelodysplasia

The myelodysplastic syndromes have, since their first recognition decades ago, been considered notoriously difficult with regard to their proper classification, determination of prognosis, and optimal treatment. With the advent of the French-American-British (FAB) classification, now aided but not superseded by the World Health Organization classification, distinct biological entities have been delineated, which in turn are very useful for stratification to different, established and experimental treatment modalities. However, precise subclassification of different types of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is only possible with hematopathological studies based on the analysis of peripheral blood, bone marrow smear, and bone marrow biopsy, backed by appropriate clinical information. Bone marrow cytogenetics are also essential for any risk stratification since they still provide the second most powerful prognostic parameter after bone marrow blast enumeration. This paper will review the most important aspects of hematopathological diagnostics in MDS, risk scoring, and their application to the inclusion and stratification of patients into the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/German MDS Study Group Phase III multicenter trial of low-dose decitabine in patients more than 60 years old with high-risk MDS. Emphasis is placed on itemizing the broad spectrum of cytologic and histologic stigmata defining the myelodysplastic categories that are to be considered in this study.     

Comparison of five prognostic scoring systems, the French–American–British (FAB) and World Health Organization (WHO) classifications in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: results of a single-center analysis

We retrospectively studied 89 consecutive patients diagnosed with primary myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) over a period of 10 years to (1) identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS); (2) to assess and compare the Bournemouth-, Spanish-, Düsseldorf-, Lille-, and the International prognostic scoring systems (IPSS); and to (3) compare the French–American–British (FAB) and World Health Organization (WHO) classifications. The median age of patients was 63 years (range, 26–85). Karyotype analyses were done in 85 patients (96%). Median OS was 3 years; 67 patients (75%) have died, and 28 (31%) had progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Major independent prognostic variables for both OS and LFS (multivariate analysis) were percentage of bone marrow (BM) blasts (P<0.0001), and in patients with cytogenetic data available, cytogenetic risk groups by Lille-score (OS, P=0.031/LFS, P=0.002) and IPSS (OS, P=0.024). All five prognostic scoring systems successfully discriminated risk groups as regards OS and LFS, but in patients with cytogenetic data available, the major independent prognostic score for OS (P<0.0001) and LFS (P=0.006) was the IPSS. The FAB and WHO classifications also successfully discriminated between risk groups. The new WHO subgroups [refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (RCMD), with (RCMD-RS) or without ringed sideroblasts] showed a significantly (P=0.0454) different prognosis for OS, but not for LFS (P=0.0839), in comparison to the subgroups having erythroid dysplasia only (RA/RARS). Risk stratification into refractory anemia with excess blast-I (RAEB-I) and RAEB-II tended to yield different prognoses for OS and LFS. The 5q-minus syndrome strongly predicted for a good prognosis. In patients treated with the demethylating agent decitabine (n=24), IPSS “poor risk” cytogenetics were unable to predict for the expected worse prognosis when compared to “intermediate-risk” cytogenetics. In conclusion, we confirm in a single-center patient cohort that the use of the WHO classification improves the predictive value of the FAB classification and that, in patients with cytogenetic data available, the IPSS can be used for clinical decision-making.     

Identification of distinct prognostic subgroups in low- and intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes by flow cytometry

The World Health Organization (WHO) classification contributes to refined classification and prognostication of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs). Flow cytometry might add significantly to diagnostic and prognostic criteria. Our analysis of bone marrow samples from 50 patients with MDS showed aberrant expression of differentiation antigens in the myelomonocytic lineage. This also accounted for refractory anemia (RA) with or without ringed sideroblasts (RS), indicating multilineage dysplasia. In 38% of patients, CD34(+) myeloid blasts expressed CD5, CD7, or CD56. Flow cytometry data were translated into a numerical MDS flow-score. Flow-scores increased significantly from RA with or without RS, refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (RCMD) with or without RS up to refractory anemia with excess of blasts-1 (RAEB-1) and RAEB-2. No significant differences were observed between WHO cytogenetic subgroups. Flow-scores were highly heterogeneous within International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) subgroups. Patients in progression to advanced MDS or acute myeloid leukemia had a significantly higher flow-score compared with non-transfusion-dependent patients. In 60% of patients with transfusion dependency or progressive disease, myeloid blasts expressed CD7 or CD56, in contrast to only 9% of non-transfusion-dependent patients. Moreover, all patients with pure RA with or without RS with aberrant myeloid blasts showed an adverse clinical course. In conclusion, flow cytometry in MDS identified aberrancies in the myelomonocytic lineage not otherwise determined by cytomorphology. In addition, flow cytometry identified patients at risk for transfusion dependency and/or progressive disease independent of known risk groups, which might have impact on treatment decisions and the prognostic scoring system in the near future.     

Multicenter validation of a reproducible flow cytometric score for the diagnosis of low-grade myelodysplastic syndromes: results of a European LeukemiaNET study

Background

The current World Health Organization classification of myelodysplastic syndromes is based morphological evaluation of bone marrow dysplasia. In clinical practice, the reproducibility of the recognition of dysplasia is usually poor especially in cases that lack specific markers such as ring sideroblasts and clonal cytogenetic abnormalities.

Design and Methods

We aimed to develop and validate a flow cytometric score for the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome. Four reproducible parameters were analyzed: CD34⁺ myeloblast-related and B-progenitor-related cluster size (defined by CD45 expression and side scatter characteristics CD34⁺ marrow cells), myeloblast CD45 expression and granulocyte side scatter value. The study comprised a “learning cohort” (n=538) to define the score and a “validation cohort” (n=259) to confirm its diagnostic value.

Results

With respect to non-clonal cytopenias, patients with myelodysplastic syndrome had increased myeloblast-related cluster size, decreased B-progenitor-related cluster size, aberrant CD45 expression and reduced granulocyte side scatter (P<0.001). To define the flow cytometric score, these four parameters were combined in a regression model and the weight for each variable was estimated based on coefficients from that model. In the learning cohort a correct diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome was formulated in 198/281 cases (sensitivity 70%), while 18 false-positive results were noted among 257 controls (specificity 93%). Sixty-five percent of patients without specific markers of dysplasia (ring sideroblasts and clonal cytogenetic abnormalities) were correctly classified. A high value of the flow cytometric score was associated with multilineage dysplasia (P=0.001), transfusion dependency (P=0.02), and poor-risk cytogenetics (P=0.04). The sensitivity and specificity in the validation cohort (69% and 92%, respectively) were comparable to those in the learning cohort. The likelihood ratio of the flow cytometric score was 10.

Conclusions

A flow cytometric score may help to establish the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome, especially when morphology and cytogenetics are indeterminate.     

Acute erythroid neoplastic proliferations. A biological study based on 62 patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The terms acute erythroleukemia and AML-M6 are defined in the FAB classification as proliferations of dysplastic erythroid elements mixed with blasts of myeloid origin, but pure erythroid leukemias are not included. The recent WHO classification has a category of acute myeloid leukemia not otherwise categorized, which includes acute erythroid leukemia (M6) of two subtypes: M6a-erythroleukemia (erythroid/myeloid) and M6b-pure erythroid leukemia. The aims of this co-operative study were to discover the incidences of these different subtypes, and pay special attention to the morphology of these entities. DESIGN AND METHODS: We reviewed a series of 62 patients with erythroid neoplastic proliferations. Previous medical history, age, sex, peripheral blood and bone marrow cell counts, cytochemical stains, immunophenotype, and cytogenetics were evaluated at presentation. We analyzed the incidence of erythrocyte, leukocyte and platelet abnormalities in the peripheral blood. In bone marrow we analyzed dysplastic features of erythroblasts, granulocytic elements and the megakaryocytic lineage. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients met the criteria of M6a subtype of the WHO classification, and 2 were classified as having pure erythremia (M6b); 7 cases could not be classified according to the WHO criteria. Fifty-five patients presented with de novo acute leukemia, and seven patients had secondary acute leukemia. The most frequent dysplastic features in blood smears were: schistocytes, tear-drop and pincered cells in erythrocytes; hypogranulation and hyposegmentation in leukocytes; gigantism and hypogranulation in platelets. In bone marrow, megaloblastic changes, multinuclearity, karyorrhexis and basophilic stippling in erythroblasts; hypogranulation and gigantism in granulocytic series, and micromegakaryocytes and unconnected nuclei in megakarocytes were the most dysplastic features. A positive PAS reaction and increase of bone marrow iron with ring sideroblasts were common features. Trilineage dysplasia was present in 54% of cases. Dysplastic features in granulocytic elements were absent in 26% of patients and minimal erythroblastic dysplasia was observed in seven patients. A complex karyotype was seen in 27% of patients; chromosomes 5 and 7 were the most frequently involved. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: De novo acute erythroid leukemia was more frequent than secondary cases in our series. The most frequent type of acute erythroid proliferation was the WHO M6a subtype and the least the pure erythroid leukemia. We found a group of seven patients (11%) who could not be classified according to the WHO criteria. Morphologic findings of erythrocytes in peripheral blood, such as schistocytes, tear-drop and pincered cells, were outstanding features. Morphologic aspects remain one of the most important tools for diagnosing these entities.     

Clinical activity of azacitidine in patients who relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia

Disease relapse is the most common cause of treatment failure after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes, yet treatment options for such patients remain extremely limited. Azacitidine is an important new therapy in high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia but its role in patients who relapse post allograft has not been defined. We studied the tolerability and activity of azacitidine in 181 patients who relapsed after an allograft for acute myeloid leukemia (n=116) or myelodysplastic syndromes (n=65). Sixty-nine patients received additional donor lymphocyte infusions. Forty-six of 157 (25%) assessable patients responded to azacitidine therapy: 24 (15%) achieved a complete remission and 22 a partial remission. Response rates were higher in patients transplanted in complete remission (P=0.04) and those transplanted for myelodysplastic syndromes (P=0.023). In patients who achieved a complete remission, the 2-year overall survival was 48% versus 12% for the whole population. Overall survival was determined by time to relapse post transplant more than six months (P=0.001) and percentage of blasts in the bone marrow at time of relapse (P=0.01). The concurrent administration of donor lymphocyte infusion did not improve either response rates or overall survival in patients treated with azacitidine. An azacitidine relapse prognostic score was developed which predicted 2-year overall survival ranging from 3%–37% (P=0.00001). We conclude that azacitidine represents an important new therapy in selected patients with acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndromes who relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Prospective studies to confirm optimal treatment options in this challenging patient population are required.     

Two types of acquired idiopathic sideroblastic anaemia (AISA)

On cytological bone marrow examination we distinguished between pure sideroblastic anaemia (PSA), which is confined to dyserythropoiesis, and refractory anaemia with ring sideroblasts (RARS), which is characterized by additional dysplastic features of granulopoiesis and/or megakaryopoiesis. In a follow-up study of 94 patients with AISA diagnosed according to FAB criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes we found a striking difference in the risk of leukaemic transformation between PSA and RARS (5 year cumulative rate 1.9% v. 48%). Overall survival was much better in PSA than in RARS (5 year cumulative chance 69% v. 19%). Infections and haemorrhages were frequent causes of death in RARS but not in PSA. Bone marrow culture studies (CFU-GM) were performed on 10 consecutive patients with PSA and RARS, respectively. RARS patients showed grossly impaired colony growth, typical of the myelodysplastic syndromes. Patients with PSA had persisting colony formation, even if moderately decreased in frequency, with numbers of CFU-GM being inversely correlated with the degree of erythroid hyperplasia in the bone marrow. We conclude that on cytomorphological grounds AISA can be divided into pure (dyserythropoietic) sideroblastic anaemia (PSA) and a true myelodysplastic form (RARS), with both types differing considerably in terms of survival, risk of leukaemic transformation and findings on bone marrow culture (CFU-GM).     

Clinical features and course of refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts associated with marked thrombocytosis

Background

Refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts associated with marked thrombocytosis was proposed as a provisional entity in the 2001 World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and also in the 2008 version, but its existence as a single entity is contested. We wish to define the clinical features of this rare myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm and to compare its clinical outcome with that of refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and essential thrombocythemia.

Design and Methods

We conducted a collaborative retrospective study across Europe. Our database included 200 patients diagnosed with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and marked thrombocytosis. For each of these patients, each patient diagnosed with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts was matched for age and sex. At the same time, a cohort of 454 patients with essential thrombocythemia was used to compare outcomes of the two diseases.

Results

In patients with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and marked thrombocytosis, depending on the Janus Kinase 2 V617F mutational status (positive or negative) or platelet threshold (over or below 600×10⁹/L), no difference in survival was noted. However, these patients had shorter overall survival and leukemia-free survival with a lower risk of thrombotic complications than did patients with essential thrombocythemia (P<0.001) but better survival (P<0.001) and a higher risk of thrombosis (P=0.039) than patients with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts.

Conclusions

The clinical course of refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and marked thrombocytosis is better than that of refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and worse than that of essential thrombocythemia. The higher risk of thrombotic events in this disorder suggests that anti-platelet therapy might be considered in this subset of patients. From a clinical point of view, it appears to be important to consider refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts and marked thrombocytosis as a distinct entity.