切向双弧容积弧形调强技术对保乳术后包括内乳淋巴结区照射的心脏剂量学评价

目的 通过对左侧乳腺癌保乳术后患者内乳淋巴结局部放疗,探讨一种新的切向50°双弧容积弧形调强放射治疗（tangential volumetric modulated arc therapy,T-VMAT）技术的剂量学特点,评价T-VMAT对心脏的潜在保护作用。方法 15例左侧乳腺癌保乳术后患者,每例患者分别设计常规加楔形板切线野（W-TF）、6野调强适形放射治疗（6F-IMRT）和T-VMAT计划,靶区处方剂量50 Gy/25次,计算并比较靶区和危及器官（OAR）的剂量体积参数和适形指标。结果 与W-TF相比,T-VMAT技术不仅可降低心脏和冠状动脉前降支（LAD）最大剂量D_max、平均剂量D_mean和≥ 10 Gy剂量区体积（P<0.05）,而且有降低5 Gy剂量区体积V_{5 Gy}趋势,但差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;与6F-IMRT相比,T-VMAT技术可明显降低心脏的D_mean、V_{5 Gy}、V_{10 Gy}和V_{20 Gy},以及LAD的D_mean、V_{5 Gy}和V_{10 Gy}（P<0.05）。与W-TF相比,T-VMAT计划中同侧肺V_{20 Gy}和健侧乳腺V_{5 Gy}均未增加,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,且靶区剂量覆盖和适形度均明显优于W-TF,热点体积V₁₁₀明显低于W-TF（P<0.05）。结论 在不增加同侧肺和健侧乳腺受照体积的同时,T-VMAT不仅可以降低心脏和LAD高剂量区受照体积,而且有降低心脏和LAD低剂量区受照体积的趋势。     

Superiority of Equivalent Uniform Dose (EUD)-Based Optimization for Breast and Chest Wall*

We investigate whether IMRT optimization based on generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) objectives for organs at risk (OAR) results in superior dosimetric outcomes when compared with multiple dose-volume (DV)–based objectives plans for patients with intact breast and postmastectomy chest wall (CW) cancer. Four separate IMRT plans were prepared for each of the breast and CW cases (10 patients). The first three plans used our standard in-house, physician-selected, DV objectives (phys-plan); gEUD-based objectives for the OARs (gEUD-plan); and multiple, “very stringent,” DV objectives for each OAR and PTV (DV-plan), respectively. The fourth plan was only beam-fluence optimized (FO-plan), without segmentation, which used the same objectives as in the DV-plan. The latter plan was to be used as an “optimum” benchmark without the effects of the segmentation for deliverability. Dosimetric quantities, such as V_20Gy for the ipsilateral lung and mean dose (D_mean) for heart, contralateral breast, and contralateral lung were used to evaluate the results. For all patients in this study, we have seen that the gEUD-based plans allow greater sparing of the OARs while maintaining equivalent target coverage. The average ipsilateral lung V_20Gy reduced from 22 ± 4.4% for the FO-plan to 18 ± 3% for the gEUD-plan. All other dosimetric quantities shifted towards lower doses for the gEUD-plan. gEUD-based optimization can be used to search for plans of different DVHs with the same gEUDs. The use of gEUD allows selective optimization and reduction of the dose for each OAR and results in a truly individualized treatment plan.     

The dosimetric advantages of perirectal hydrogel spacer in men with localized prostate cancer undergoing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)

To evaluate the dosimetric differences for patients receiving a perirectal hydrogel spacer (PR-HS) using SpaceOAR undergoing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for localized prostate cancer with the CyberKnife VSI system. Gold fiducial markers and a PR-HS was inserted in 22 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed localized prostate cancer. For planning comparison, dosimetry from the clinical plans was compared against replans based on a simulated rectum volume designed to recreate a clinically appropriate spacer-less anatomy for each patient. Both sets were planned to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions using the treatment planning system associated with the CyberKnife VSI system. The aim was to ensure equivalent target coverage for both plans and to evaluate doses to the organs-at-risk (OARs): rectum, bladder and penile bulb. The median PR-HS implant volume was 11.2 cc (range 8.8 to 14.9 cc). The maximal median perirectal separation was 15.5 mm (10.5 to 20.7 mm). Statistically significant reductions were noted for the 3 OARs, with no statistically significant difference in planning target volumes or clinical target volume coverage. All rectal dose constraints were significantly improved in the PR-HS plans with a percentage dose difference of at least 24% (rectum V_18.1Gy (%)) to 60.5% (rectum V_36Gy (cc)). The bladder and penile bulb dose constraints parameters were also significantly improved: the bladder V_37Gy was reduced by 17.1%, V_18.1Gy was reduced by 4.2%; the penile bulb D_50% was reduced by 7.7%. The use of PR-HS was able to significantly reduce planned dose to the rectum, bladder and penile bulb with SABR techniques associated with the CyberKnife VSI system.     

Dosimetric effect of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for postoperative non-small cell lung cancer with and without air cavity in the planning target volume

To evaluate the dosimetric effect of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for postoperative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with and without the air cavity in the planning target volume (PTV). Two kinds of IMRT plans were made for 21 postoperative NSCLC patients. In Plan-0: PTV included the tracheal air cavity, and in Plan-1: the air cavity was subtracted from the PTV. For PTV, the dosimetric parameters, including D_mean, D₉₈, D₉₅, D₂, D_0.2, conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI) were evaluated. For organs at risk (OARs), the evaluation indexes, included the V₅, V₂₀ and the mean lung dose (MLD) of total lung, the V₃₀, V₄₀, and the mean heart dose (MHD) of heart, the spinal cord D_max, and the V₃₅ and the mean esophageal dose (MED) of esophagus. The number of segments and MUs were also recorded. Additionally, the correlation between the Plan-1 dosimetric change value relative to Plan-0, the size of air cavity, and the volume proportion of the cavity in the PTV was also analyzed. The D_mean of PTV, D₂, D_0.2, HI and CI in Plan-1 decreased compared with those in Plan-0. For OARs, the V₃₀, MHD, and MED also decreased. The CI change value of Plan-1 relative to Plan-0 had a significantly negative correlation with the size and the volume proportion of air cavity, and the MED change value also had a significantly negative correlation with the air cavity size. The IMRT plans for patients with postoperative NSCLC can achieve a better target dose distribution and offer an improved sparing of the heart and esophagus by removing the PTV air cavity, while reducing the target conformity. The change value of CI and MED had a significantly negative correlation with the air cavity size.     

Dosimetric Comparison of RapidArc with Fixed Gantry Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Treatment for Multiple Liver Metastases Radiotherapy

We wanted to compare the dosimetric difference and treatment efficiency of RapidArc and fixed gantry intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment (IMRT) for multiple liver metastases. Computed tomography datasets of 10 patients were studied retrospectively. IMRT plans were generated using 5 fields and RapidArc using either 1 or 2 arcs. The dose distribution of planning target volume (PTV), organs at risk (OARs), and the normal tissue were compared. Monitor units and treatment time were scored to measure expected treatment efficiency. Both RapidArc and IMRT plans resulted in equivalent target coverage. There was no statistically significant difference for the maximum and the minimum dose of PTV. RapidArc plans achieved an improved conformity index compared with IMRT (RA1 = 1.68 ± 0.27, RA2 = 1.61 ± 0.25, IMRT = 1.80 ± 0.37). For OARs, all techniques respected planning objectives. RapidArc plans had a lower dose in V₄₀ of small bowel than IMRT, but were higher in mean dose of kidneys. Concerning the V₅, V₁₀, and V₁₅ of healthy tissue, RapidArc plans were higher than IMRT. However, the V₂₀, V₂₅, and V₃₀ of healthy tissue in RapidArc plans were lower than IMRT. Monitor units per fraction of RapidArc plans were about 40% or 46% of IMRT. Compared with IMRT plans, treatment time of RapidArc plans were reduced by 60% or 70%. All techniques respected planning objectives. RapidArc showed statistical improvements in conformity index and healthy tissue sparing with uncompromised target coverage. This, in combination with fewer monitor units and short delivery time, can lead to clinically significant advances for the treatment of multiple liver metastases.     

左侧乳腺癌患者根治术后常规调强计划与电子束适形联合调强计划的剂量比较

目的比较左侧乳腺癌患者根治术后常规调强放射治疗计划(intensity modulated radiotherapy, IMRT)与电子束适形放疗(electron beam conformal radiotherapy, EBCRT)联合调强放疗计划的剂量学差异。方法选择2018年6月至2021年10月于宁波市第一医院放化疗中心收治的20例左侧乳腺癌根治术后患者资料, 计划靶区(plan target volume, PTV)包括锁骨上下淋巴结引流区域计划靶区(PTVsc)和患侧胸壁计划靶区(PTVcw), 处方剂量均为50 Gy/25次。所有患者均采用美国Varian Eclipse治疗计划系统(treatment planning system, TPS)设计两种放疗计划, 然后对比两种放疗计划的剂量学参数差异。结果所有20例患者的IMRT计划全部满足临床要求, 与此同时EBCRT联合IMRT计划中有2例患者因患侧肺剂量参数超出本单位的剂量限定标准而不被临床接受, 两例失败计划的胸壁最大深度分别为3.7和4.4 cm, 使用的电子束能量分别为12和15 MeV。其余18例患者的胸...     

Dosimetric comparison of pencil beam scanning proton therapy with or without multi-leaf collimator versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy for treatment of malignant glioma

This study aimed to examine the dosimetric effect of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) with a multi-leaf collimator (MLC) in treating malignant glioma. We compared the dose distribution of IMPT with or without MLC (IMPT_MLC+ or IMPT_MLC-, respectively) using pencil beam scanning and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) plans for 16 patients with malignant gliomas. High- and low-risk target volumes were assessed using D_2%, V_90%, V_95%, homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI). Organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated using the average dose (D_mean) and D_2%. Furthermore, the dose to the normal brain was evaluated using from V_5Gy to V_40Gy at 5 Gy intervals. There were no significant differences among all techniques regarding V_90%, V_95%, and CI for the targets. HI and D_2% for IMPT_MLC+ and IMPT_MLC- were significantly superior to those for VMAT (p < 0.01). The D_mean and D_2% of all OARs for IMPT_MLC+ were equivalent or superior to those of other techniques. Regarding the normal brain, there was no significant difference in V_40Gy among all techniques whereas V_5Gy to V_35Gy in IMPT_MLC+ were significantly smaller than those in IMPT_MLC- (with differences ranging from 0.45% to 4.80%, p < 0.05) and VMAT (with differences ranging from 6.85% to 57.94%, p < 0.01). IMPT_MLC+ could reduce the dose to OARs, while maintaining target coverage compared to IMPT_MLC- and VMAT in treating malignant glioma.     

Radiation therapy of synchronous bilateral breast carcinoma (SBBC) using multiple techniques

The purpose of this study was to establish intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans for synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC) and to compare those plans with the previous treatment plans using 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT). The differences among the treatments were also statistically compared regarding dosimetry distribution and treatment efficiency. The research was conducted with 10 SBBC patients. The study established IMRT (12 fields with a single isocenter) and VMAT (2 partial arcs with a single isocenter) treatment plans for SBBC patients and then compared those plans with 3DCRT (8 fields with multiple isocenters). The plans were evaluated based on a dose-volume histogram analysis. For planning target volumes (PTVs), the mean doses and the values of V_95%, V_105%, conformity index, and homogeneity index were reported. For the organs at risk, the analysis included the mean dose, maximum dose, and V_XGy, depending on the organs (lungs, heart, and liver). To objectively evaluate the efficiency of the treatment plans, each plan's beam times, treatment times (including set-up time), and monitor units were compared. Tukey test and one-way analysis of variance were used to compare the PTV and organs at risk values of the 3 techniques. Additionally, the independent-samples t-test was used to compare the 2 techniques (IMRT and VMAT) based on the values of Rt. PTV and Lt. PTV (p?<?0.05). For PTV dose distribution, IMRT showed increases of approximately 1.2% in D_mean and of approximately 5.7% in V_95% dose distribution compared with 3DCRT. In comparison to VMAT, 3DCRT showed about 3.0% higher dose distribution in D_mean and V_95%. IMRT was the best in terms of conformity index and homogeneity index (p?<?0.05), whereas 3DCRT and VMAT did not significantly differ from each other. In terms of dose distribution on lungs, heart, and liver, the percentage of volume at high doses such as V_30Gy and V_40Gy was approximately 70% lower for IMRT and approximately 40% lower for VMAT than for 3DCRT. For distribution volumes of low doses such as V_5% and V_10%, that for 3DCRT was approximately 60% smaller than for IMRT and approximately 70% smaller than for VMAT. Comparison between IMRT and VMAT showed that the IMRT was superior in all distribution factors. VMAT showed better treatment efficiency than 3DCRT or IMRT. Among the SBBC radiotherapy treatment plans, IMRT was superior to 3DCRT and VMAT in terms of PTV dose distribution, whereas VMAT showed the most outstanding treatment efficiency.     

Dosimetric comparison of vaginal vault brachytherapy vs applicator-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy for endometrium cancer patients

We performed this dosimetric study to compare a nonstandard volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and helical tomotherapy (HT) techniques with high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BRT) plan of vaginal vault in patients with postoperative endometrial cancer (EC). Twelve postoperative patients with early stage EC were included in this study. Three plans were performed for each patient; dosimetric and radiobiological comparisons were made using dose-volume histograms and equivalent dose for determining the planning target volume (PTV) coverages in brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy, and organs-at-risk (OARs) doses between three different delivery techniques. All the plans achieved adequate dose coverage for PTV; however, the VMAT plan yielded better dose conformity, and the HT plan showed better homogeneity for target volume. With respect to the OARs, the bladder D_2cc was significantly lower in the BRT plan than in the VMAT and HT plans, with the highest bladder D_2cc value being observed in the HT plan. However, no difference was observed in the rectum D_2cc of the three plans. Other major advantages of the BRT plan over the VMAT and HT plans were the relatively lower body integral doses and femoral head doses as well as the fact that the integral doses were significantly lower in the BRT plan than in the VMAT and HT plans. This is the first dosimetric comparison of vaginal vault treatment for EC with BRT, VMAT, and HT plans. Our analyses showed the feasibility of stereotactic body radiotherapy technique as an alternative to HDR-BRT for postoperative management of EC patients.     

Chest wall radiotherapy with volumetric modulated arcs and the potential role of flattening filter free photon beams

Purpose

The goal of the work was to assess the role of RapidArc treatments in chest wall irradiation after mastectomy and determine the potential benefit of flattening filter free beams.

Methods and material

Planning CT scans of 10?women requiring post-mastectomy chest wall radiotherapy were included in the study. A dose of 50?Gy in 2?Gy fractions was prescribed. Organs at risk (OARs) delineated were heart, lungs, contralateral breast, and spinal cord. Dose–volume metrics were defined to quantify the quality of concurrent treatment plans assessing target coverage and sparing of OARs. Plans were designed for conformal 3D therapy (3DCRT) or for RapidArc with double partial arcs (RA). RapidArc plans were optimized for both conventional beams as well as for unflattened beams (RAF). The goal for this planning effort was to cover 100% of the planning target volume (PTV) with ≥?90% of the prescribed dose and to minimize the volume inside the PTV receiving >?105% of the dose. The mean ipsilateral lung dose was required to be lower than 15?Gy and V_20?Gy?Results All techniques met planning objectives for PTV and for lung (3DCRT marginally failed for V_20?Gy). RA plans showed superiority compared to 3DCRT in the medium to high dose region for the ipsilateral lung. Heart irradiation was minimized by RAF plans with ~4.5?Gy and ~15?Gy reduction in maximum dose compared to RA and 3DCRT, respectively. RAF resulted in superior plans compared to RA with respect to contralateral breast and lung with a reduction of ~1.7?Gy and 1.0?Gy in the respective mean doses.

Conclusion

RapidArc treatment resulted in acceptable plan quality with superior ipsilateral tissue sparing compared to traditional techniques. Flattening filter free beams, recently made available for clinical use, might provide further healthy tissue sparing, particularly in contralateral organs, suggesting their applicability for large and complex targets.     

Radiobiological optimization comparison between pulse-dose-rate and high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer

PurposeOnly scarce data are available on the possibility to include radiobiological optimization as part of the dosimetric process in cervical cancer treated with brachytherapy (BT). We compared dosimetric outcomes of pulse-dose-rate (PDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR)-BT, according to linear-quadratic model.Methods and MaterialsThree-dimensional dosimetric data of 10 consecutive patients with cervical cancer undergoing intracavitary image-guided adaptive PDR-BT after external beam radiation therapy were examined. A new HDR plan was generated for each patient using the same method as for the PDR plan. The procedure was intended to achieve the same D₉₀ high-risk clinical target volume with HDR as with PDR planning after conversion into dose equivalent per 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) following linear-quadratic model. Plans were compared for dosimetric variables.ResultsAs per study's methodology, the D₉₀ high-risk clinical target volume was strictly identical between PDR and HDR plans: 91.0 Gy (interquartile: 86.0–94.6 Gy). The median D₉₈ intermediate-risk clinical target volume was 62.9 Gy_EQD2 with HDR vs. 65.0 Gy_EQD2 with PDR (p < 0.001). The median bladder D_2cc was 65.6 Gy_EQD2 with HDR, vs. 62 Gy_EQD2 with PDR (p = 0.004). Doses to the rectum, sigmoid, and small bowel were higher with HDR plans with a median D_2cc of 55.6 Gy_EQD2 (vs. 55.1 Gy_EQD2, p = 0.027), 67.2 Gy_EQD2 (vs. S 64.7 Gy_EQD2, p = 0.002), and 69.4 Gy_EQD2 (vs. 66.8 Gy_EQD2, p = 0.014), respectively. For organs at risk (OARs), the effect of radiobiological weighting depended on the dose delivered. When OARs BT contribution to D_2cc doses was <20 Gy_EQD2, both BT modalities were equivalent. OARs EQD2 doses were all higher with HDR when BT contribution to D_2cc was ≥20 Gy_EQD2.ConclusionBoth BT modalities provided satisfactory target volume coverage with a slightly higher value with the HDR technique for OARs D2_cc while intermediate-risk clinical target volume received higher dose in the PDR plan. The radiobiological benefit of PDR over HDR was predominant when BT contribution dose to OARs was >20 Gy.     

Field-in-field IMRT versus 3D-CRT of the breast. Cardiac vessels, ipsilateral lung, and contralateral breast absorbed doses in patients with left-sided lumpectomy: a dosimetric comparison

Purpose

This study evaluated dose distribution and homogeneity of field-in-field intensity-modulated radiation treatment (FIF-IMRT) compared with standard wedged tangential-beam 3D conformal radiotherapy (CRT) of the left breast in patients who have undergone lumpectomy. Our aim was to improve dose-distribution homogeneity in the breast and decrease the dose to organs at risk (OAR), i.e, heart and vessels, ipsilateral lung, and contralateral breast.

Materials and methods

FIF-IMRT and wedge plans of 3D-CRT were carried out for 18 patients with cancer of the left breast. Plans were compared according to cumulative dose-volume histogram (c-DVH) analysis in terms of planned treatment volume (PTV), homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI), as well as dose and volume parameters of OARs.

Results

When the targeted volumes receiving 105 % and 110 % of the prescribed dose in the PTV were compared, significant decreases were found with the FIF-IMRT technique. With the 105 % dose to the OARs, monitor unit (MU) counts were significantly lower with the FIF-IMRT technique. V2 of pulmonary artery, left atrium, and aorta and V1 for the contralateral breast were statistically significantly lower with FIF-IMRT plans (p = 0.001). PTV showed a better HI and CI with FIF-IMRT.

Conclusions

FIF-IMRT enables better dose distribution in the PTV and reduces dose to OARs in breast cancer radiotherapy.     

Volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for esophageal cancer

A treatment planning study was performed to evaluate the performance of volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc (RA) against 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques for esophageal cancer. Computed tomgraphy scans of 10 patients were included in the study. 3D-CRT, 4-field IMRT, and single-arc and double-arc RA plans were generated with the aim to spare organs at risk (OAR) and healthy tissue while enforcing highly conformal target coverage. The planning objective was to deliver 54 Gy to the planning target volume (PTV) in 30 fractions. Plans were evaluated based on target conformity and dose-volume histograms of organs at risk (lung, spinal cord, and heart). The monitor unit (MU) and treatment delivery time were also evaluated to measure the treatment efficiency. The IMRT plan improves target conformity and spares OAR when compared with 3D-CRT. Target conformity improved with RA plans compared with IMRT. The mean lung dose was similar in all techniques. However, RA plans showed a reduction in the volume of the lung irradiated at V_20Gy and V_30Gy dose levels (range, 4.62–17.98%) compared with IMRT plans. The mean dose and D_35% of heart for the RA plans were better than the IMRT by 0.5–5.8%. Mean V_10Gy and integral dose to healthy tissue were almost similar in all techniques. But RA plans resulted in a reduced low-level dose bath (15–20 Gy) in the range of 14–16% compared with IMRT plans. The average MU needed to deliver the prescribed dose by RA technique was reduced by 20–25% compared with IMRT technique. The preliminary study on RA for esophageal cancers showed improvements in sparing OAR and healthy tissue with reduced beam-on time, whereas only double-arc RA offered improved target coverage compared with IMRT and 3D-CRT plans.     

俯卧盆腔固定装置在妇科肿瘤调强放疗计划中的剂量学影响

目的研究俯卧盆腔固定装置对妇科肿瘤调强放射治疗剂量学的影响。方法回顾性分析2020年8月至2021年6月在中山大学附属第三医院接受放疗的宫颈癌和子宫内膜癌患者共20例, 每位患者均采取两种方法勾画外轮廓, 第1种仅包含患者轮廓, 第2种包含患者轮廓和固定装置。每例患者在放疗计划系统(TPS)中分别用两组轮廓计算相同的7野调强计划, 通过剂量体积直方图(DVH)和计划相减来比较不带固定装置计划Planwithout和带固定装置计划Planwith间剂量学差异。在仿真人模体中使用EBT3胶片验证实际点剂量, 并分别比较其与上述两个计划剂量的差异。结果 Planwith的靶区100%、98%处方剂量的覆盖体积V50 Gy、V49 Gy和均值Dmean分别下降了19.75%、7.99%和2.54%(t = 8.96、10.49、22.09, P<0.01);皮肤的V40Gy、V30Gy、V20Gy、V15Gy和Dmean分别上升了51.79%、51.05%、45.72%、33.63%和10.80%(t = -2.54、-5.63、-15.57、-24.06、-13.88, P<0....     

乳腺癌根治术后双弧VMAT与IMRT计划的剂量学比较

目的 比较乳腺癌根治术后双弧的容积旋转调强放射治疗(VMAT)与5野的静态调强放射治疗(IMRT)2种计划之间的剂量学差异,评估VMAT技术在乳腺癌根治术后的剂量学特点与应用能力.方法 选取28例乳腺癌根治术后患者(左侧10例,右侧18例),分别制定双90度弧段的VMAT与5野的IMRT 2种计划,主要的计划评估参数为靶区的肿瘤控制概率(TCP)、适形指数(CI)、均匀指数(HI)以及接受相应处方剂量水平照射体积百分比V₉₅、V₁₁₀,危及器官(OAR)评估包括患侧肺的正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)、D_mean、V₅、V₂₀、V₃₀,心脏的NTCP值、D_mean、V₂₅,健侧乳腺的D_mean、机器跳数(MU)以及治疗时间.结果 VMAT计划与IMRT计划的TCP值分别为(96±2)%、(90±2)%(t=-6.28,P<0.01);HI值分别为0.15±0.04,0.22±0.02(t=13.29,P<0.05);肿瘤位于左侧时,心脏NTCP值在VMAT计划与IMRT计划中分别为(1.0±0.12)%,(1.7±0.13)%(t=2.14,P<0.05);肿瘤位于右侧时,2种计划心脏的NTCP差异无统计学意义,平均剂量分别为(3.27±0.26)、(6.0±0.47)Gy(t=9.21, P<0.01);VMAT计划在MU少于IMRT计划(t=9.58,P<0.01),治疗时间短于IMRT计划(t=8.40,P<0.05).结论 乳腺癌根治术后,VMAT计划具有更强的临床应用能力,且表现出更优的剂量学特点.     

Locoregional irradiation including internal mammary nodal region for left-sided breast cancer after breast conserving surgery: Dosimetric evaluation of 4 techniques

The present study aimed to compare 4 techniques in the planning of locoregional irradiation including internal mammary nodal region for left-sided breast cancer. Ten patients with left-sided breast cancer undergoing breast conservation surgery were enrolled. For each patient, 4 treatment plans were performed: a helical tomotherapy (HT) plan, a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan, a static intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan, and a hybrid IMRT plan, designed to encompass the whole breast, internal mammary, and supraclavicular nodal regions. The prescribed dose of radiation was 50 Gy in 25 fractions. The dosimetric parameters of the target and organs at risk, as well as the dose delivery time, were evaluated and compared using an independent-samples t-test. The HT and VMAT plans had the best conformity and homogeneity. For the HT, VMAT, IMRT, and hybrid IMRT plans, the mean conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) were 0.83, 0.82, 0.8, and 0.77 (p < 0.001); and 1.07, 1.11, 1.14, and 1.14 (p < 0.001), respectively. The corresponding V₅₅ values were 0.3%, 11.4%, 27.02%, and 23.29% (p < 0.001). The D_mean and V₂₀ of the left lung obtained using the HT plan were significantly lower than those of VMAT, IMRT, and hybrid IMRT plans (p = 0.002, p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in D max of LAD descending coronary artery, or the D_mean of the heart among the 4 types of plans. The HT and VMAT plans had a lower dose to other organ at risk (OARs) compared with the IMRT and hybrid IMRT plans. The mean delivery times were 1042 ± 33 seconds, 136 ± 12 seconds, 450 ± 65 seconds, and 451 ± 70 seconds for the HT, VMAT, IMRT, and hybrid IMRT plans, respectively (p < 0.001). For whole breast plus supraclavicular and internal mammary nodal irradiation in left-sided breast cancer, the VMAT technique is recommended considering both the dose distribution and the delivery time. Under circumstances in which dose distribution is a priority, the HT technique is a valid option.