Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy Using Fluorouracil,Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin versus Transarterial Chemoembolization as Initial Treatment for Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score–Matching Analysis

PurposeTo compare the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with a modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX) regimen with that of transarterial chemoembolization as a locoregional treatment for patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodsThis retrospective study included adult patients with locally advanced HCC who received first-line treatment with either HAIC-mFOLFOX or conventional transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy from January 2015 to December 2016. The outcomes, including tumor response rates, evaluated via imaging assessment using the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors; overall survival; progression-free survival; and safety, were compared. The propensity score–matching methodology was used to reduce the influence of confounding factors on the outcomes.ResultsThe study included 131 patients with locally advanced HCC who underwent transarterial chemoembolization and 101 who received HAIC-mFOLFOX as initial treatment. After propensity score matching (n = 67 in each group), patients who received HAIC-mFOLFOX had a higher objective response rate (43.3% vs 13.4%, P = .001), longer median overall survival (13.9 vs 6.0 months, P < .001), and longer median progression-free survival (6.4 vs 2.8 months, P = .001) than those who underwent transarterial chemoembolization. The survival benefit with HAIC-mFOLFOX was strengthened in patients with HCC with vascular invasion (hazard ratio: 0.379; 95% confidence interval: 0.237–0.607). HAIC-mFOLFOX was associated with lower incidences of severe adverse events (8.9% vs 22.9%) and liver toxicity than transarterial chemoembolization.ConclusionsCompared with transarterial chemoembolization, HAIC-mFOLFOX is a potentially safer and more effective locoregional therapy for patients with locally advanced HCC.     

Comparison of Drug-Eluting Embolics versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

PurposeTo compare the cost-effectiveness of using doxorubicin-loaded drug-eluting embolic (DEE) transarterial chemoembolization versus that of using conventional transarterial chemoembolization for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and MethodsA decision-analysis model was constructed over the lifespan of a payer’s perspective. The model simulated the clinical course, including periprocedural complications, additional transarterial chemoembolization or other treatments (ablation, radioembolization, or systemic treatment), palliative care, and death, of patients with unresectable HCC. All clinical parameters were derived from the literature. Base case calculations, probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and multiple two-way sensitivity analyses were performed.ResultsIn the base case calculations for patients with a median age of 67 years (range for conventional transarterial chemoembolization: 28–88 years, range for DEE-transarterial chemoembolization: 16–93 years), conventional transarterial chemoembolization yielded a health benefit of 2.11 quality-adjusted life years (QALY) at a cost of $125,324, whereas DEE-transarterial chemoembolization yielded 1.71 QALY for $144,816. In 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations, conventional transarterial chemoembolization continued to be a more cost-effective strategy. conventional transarterial chemoembolization was cost-effective when the complication risks for both the procedures were simultaneously varied from 0% to 30%. DEE-transarterial chemoembolization became cost-effective if the conventional transarterial chemoembolization mortality exceeded that of DEE-transarterial chemoembolization by 17% in absolute values. The two-way sensitivity analyses demonstrated that conventional transarterial chemoembolization was cost-effective until the risk of disease progression was >0.4% of that for DEE-transarterial chemoembolization in absolute values. Our analysis showed that DEE-transarterial chemoembolization would be more cost-effective if it offered >2.5% higher overall survival benefit than conventional transarterial chemoembolization in absolute values.ConclusionsCompared with DEE-transarterial chemoembolization, conventional transarterial chemoembolization yielded a higher number of QALY at a lower cost, making it the more cost-effective of the 2 modalities.     

Integrated Liver Inflammatory Score Predicts the Therapeutic Outcome of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Transarterial Chemoembolization

PurposeTo evaluate the performance of the integrated liver inflammatory score (ILIS) in predicting survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received transarterial chemoembolization, and to compare ILIS to other prognostic scoring systems and inflammatory indices.Materials and MethodsThis study included 192 patients with unresectable HCC who underwent transarterial chemoembolization from 3 medical centers. The potential risk factors of the patients’ overall survival (OS) were determined by multivariate Cox regression analysis. The predictive performances of ILIS in 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. The discriminatory power in the OS of ILIS and the other known scoring systems or inflammatory indices was determined by C-statistic.ResultsMultivariate regression analysis showed that high ILIS (P = .047), low lymphocyte count (P = .034), beyond up-to-seven criteria (P = .021), and nonresponse to the first transarterial chemoembolization session (P = .039) were risk factors for poor prognosis after transarterial chemoembolization. The predictive performances of ILIS for 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival were good, with area under the curve values of 0.627, 0.631, 0.621, 0.577, and 0.681, respectively. ILIS outperformed other standard scoring systems and inflammatory indices in predicting OS, with a C-statistic of 0.625.ConclusionsILIS is a powerful prognostic index for predicting the survival of patients with HCC after transarterial chemoembolization, which suggests that ILIS before treatment should be considered during the patient evaluation process.     

Clinical Significance of the Initial and Best Responses after Chemoembolization in the Treatment of Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Preserved Liver Function

PurposeTo evaluate the clinical implications of initial and best responses during repeated transarterial chemoembolization procedures for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and MethodsThis study included 726 patients who received a diagnosis of intermediate-stage HCC with Child-Pugh class A liver function between 2007 and 2016, and who were treated with transarterial chemoembolization as the first-line treatment. Evaluation of treatment response was based on the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. Overall survival (OS) was compared between response categories after implementation of landmark analysis.ResultsOf the 726 patients, an objective response (complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]) was observed as the initial response in 78.1% of patients. Regarding the best response during the transarterial chemoembolization series, 87.2% of patients were overall responders. The median OS of initial responders (n = 483) was not significantly different from that of subsequent responders at the 1-year landmark (stable disease [SD] after first transarterial chemoembolization but CR or PR after repeated transarterial chemoembolization; n = 61; 46.2 vs 40.1 months, respectively; P = .145). Likewise, the median OS of initial CR patients (n = 326) was not significantly different from that of the subsequent CR group (n = 126) at the 1-year landmark (PR or SD after first transarterial chemoembolization but CR after repeated transarterial chemoembolization; 53.4 vs 46.3 months, respectively; P = .455). Multivariate Cox analyses showed that the objective responses, the initial responses (hazard ratio [HR], 0.638; P = .001), and the best responses (HR, 0.304; P < .001) had the significant prognostic significance for OS.ConclusionsBoth the initial and best responses during repeated transarterial chemoembolization were significantly associated with OS in patients with intermediate-stage HCC and preserved liver function.     

Transarterial Chemoembolization Followed by Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Impact of the Time Interval between the Two Treatments on Outcome

PurposeTo compare the efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) ablation after transarterial chemoembolization within or beyond 30 days for medium-large or multiple recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs).Materials and MethodsIn this single-center retrospective study conducted from 2007 through 2015, 135 patients with a single recurrent HCC (>3 cm) or multiple (2–5 tumors) recurrent HCCs underwent transarterial chemoembolization plus RF ablation. A total of 62 patients underwent RF ablation after transarterial chemoembolization within 30 days (sequential group) and 73 patients underwent RF ablation after transarterial chemoembolization beyond 30 days (delayed group). Outcomes of interests included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and complete response (CR) rate.ResultsThe median OS and PFS were 49.8 and 38.0 months for sequential group, and 31.0 and 11.6 months for the delayed group. The sequential group experienced significantly better OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.517; P = .002) and PFS (HR, 0.621; P = .021). Among patients with multiple tumors or a single tumor >5 cm, the sequential group still had significantly longer OS (P = .022; P = .018, respectively) and PFS (P = 0.042; P = .036, respectively) than the delayed group, although no significant differences were observed among patients with solitary 3- to 5-cm tumors (P = .138; P = .803, respectively). The sequential group had a significantly better CR rate than the delayed group (85.4% vs. 68.5%, respectively; P = .035). Significant predictors of OS and PFS included maximum tumor size, number of tumors, and time interval between transarterial chemoembolization and RF ablation.ConclusionsTransarterial chemoembolization plus sequential RF ablation within 30 days was more effective for recurrent HCCs than transarterial chemoembolization plus delayed RF ablation. The time interval within 30 days is required for treating large or multiple HCCs but may not be necessary for solitary medium-sized HCC.     

Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Tirapazamine Chemoembolization for Unresectable Early- and Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PurposeTo investigate the safety of replacing doxorubicin with tirapazamine in conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in an Asian population with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to determine the optimal tirapazamine dose for phase II studies.Materials and MethodsThis was a phase I, 3 + 3 dose-escalation study for patients with unresectable early- and intermediate-stage HCC who received 5, 10, or 20 mg/m² of intra-arterial (IA) tirapazamine followed by ethiodized oil/gelatin sponge-based embolization. Key eligibilities included HCCs no more than 10 cm in diameter, prior embolization allowed, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, Child-Pugh score of 5–7, and platelet count of ≥60,000 μL. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any grade 3 nonhematological or grade 4 hematological toxicity, with the exception of transient elevation of aminotransferase levels after the procedure.ResultsSeventeen patients were enrolled, 59% of whom had progression from a prior HCC therapy and 35% of whom had progression or recurrence after TACE. All patients tolerated the tirapazamine TACE well without any DLT or serious adverse event. Using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, the complete response (CR) rate was 47%, and the CR + partial response rate was 65%. The median duration of response was not reached. The median time to progression was 12.6 months (95% confidence interval, 5.1–not reached). The median overall survival was 29.3 months. The selected phase II dose was set at a fixed dose of 35 mg of IA tirapazamine.ConclusionsIA tirapazamine with transarterial embolization was well tolerated and showed promising efficacy signals in intermediate-stage HCC, justifying pursuit of a phase II study.     

Transarterial Chemoembolization Using 100-μm Drug-Eluting Microspheres in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Study and Midterm Follow-up

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting embolic (DEE) transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients who are ineligible for curative treatment, using doxorubicin-loaded Tandem (Varian Medical) microspheres.Materials and MethodsBetween October 2015 and December 2017, 98 patients with unresectable HCC (69 males, 29 females; mean age, 60.5 ± 10.0 years of age; and American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] stage ≦T3a) treated with DEE transarterial chemoembolization using 100-μm doxorubicin-loaded microspheres were enrolled prospectively. All studies were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging 1 month after treatment was used for tumor response assessment according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and downstaging profile.ResultsMedian follow-up was 21.2 months. At follow-up examinations at 0.5-, 1-, 1.5- and 2.5-year follow-up, OS rates were 93.8%, 89.5%, 79.4%, and 77.0%, respectively. Complete response (CR), partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were noted in 50 (51.0%), 23 (23.5%), 18 (18.4%), and 7 (7.1%) patients, respectively, with 93.9% disease control rate and 74.5% objective response rate. Mean OS was 28.7 months, and mean PFS was 19.6 months. Number of nodules >3, bilobar disease, larger tumor, and higher AJCC stage correlated with worse CR. No serious adverse events occurred after DEE transarterial chemoembolization. Successful downstage rate was 73.3% (22 of 30) and number of nodules predicting successful downstaging was 7 nodules (cutoff).ConclusionsTandem DEE transarterial chemoembolization provides safe and effective treatment for HCC and a bridge or downstage therapy for liver transplantation.     

Socioeconomic and Survival Analysis of Radioembolization in Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Propensity Score–Adjusted Study

PurposeTo determine whether transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is associated with longer survival of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and whether access to TARE is influenced by socioeconomic factors.Materials and MethodsRetrospective review of patients with ICC in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2018 was performed with Cox regression analysis to identify predictors of survival. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Socioeconomic factors were compared between 2 groups using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and χ² test. Propensity score–matched cohorts were created between patients with ICC who did and did not undergo TARE.ResultsThe number of patients receiving TARE for ICC increased over time from 1 in 2004 to 210 in 2018. Patients in the TARE group were more likely to be White (87.9% vs 84.3%; P = .012) and less likely to be Hispanic/Latino (7.7% vs 11.0%; P = .009). Fewer patients who underwent TARE were uninsured (0.9% vs 2.8%; P = .012). Older age, male sex, non-White race, higher tumor grade size, and stage, earlier year of diagnosis, lack of treatment with surgery or systemic therapy, and presence of lymphatic or vascular invasion exhibited significant associations with decreased survival (P < .05 for all). Patients who underwent TARE had longer survival in both unadjusted and adjusted cohorts, with an OS of 17.5 months (vs 7.2 months in the non-TARE group) after propensity matching.ConclusionsPatients with ICC who had undergone TARE experienced significantly longer survival than that experienced by those who had not after adjusting for measurable confounders. Significant socioeconomic disparities in access to TARE remain.     

Ethnoracial Disparity in Hospital Survival following Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation for Acute Variceal Bleeding in the United States

PurposeTo investigate the magnitude of racial/ethnic differences in hospital mortality after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation for acute variceal bleeding and whether hospital care processes contribute to them.MethodsPatients aged ≥18 years undergoing TIPS creation for acute variceal bleeding in the United States (n = 10,331) were identified from 10 years (2007–2016) available in the National Inpatient Sample. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between patient race and inpatient mortality, controlling for disease severity, treatment utilization, and hospital characteristics.ResultsA total of 6,350 (62%) patients were White, 1,780 (17%) were Hispanic, and 482 (5%) were Black. A greater proportion of Black patients were admitted to urban teaching hospitals (Black, n = 409 (85%); Hispanic, n = 1,310 (74%); and White, n = 4,802 (76%); P < .001) and liver transplant centers (Black, n = 215 (45%); Hispanic, n = 401 (23%); and White, n = 2,267 (36%); P < .001). Being Black was strongly associated with mortality (Black, 32% vs non-Black, 15%; odds ratio, 3.0 [95% confidence interval, 1.6–5.8]; P = .001), as assessed using the risk-adjusted regression model. This racial disparity disappeared in a sensitivity analysis including only patients with a maximum Child-Pugh score of 13 (odds ratio 1.2 [95% confidence interval, 0.4–3.6]; P = .68), performed to compensate for the absence of Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores. Ethnoracial differences in access to teaching hospitals, liver transplant centers, first-line endoscopy, and transfusion did not significantly contribute (P > .05) to risk-adjusted mortality.ConclusionsBlack patients have a 2-fold higher inpatient mortality than non-Black patients following TIPS creation for acute variceal bleeding, possibly related to greater disease severity before the procedure.     

A Transarterial Chemoembolization of Balloon-Occluded Alternate Infusions of Cisplatin and Gelatin Particles for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Phase I/II Multicenter Prospective Study of Safety and Efficacy

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of a newly developed technique of balloon-occluded alternate infusions of cisplatin and gelatin particles in transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to evaluate the liver damage following the procedure.Materials and MethodsForty-three patients with HCC from 4 medical centers were enrolled in this multicenter prospective study. Of these, 41 patients were observed for 6 months following balloon-occluded alternate infusion transarterial chemoembolization. The primary endpoint was the safety of the procedure, and the secondary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) of the HCCs at 2 months following treatment.ResultsThree patients experienced adverse events, including 1 patient with facial swelling and skin rash, dissection of the celiac artery, and bland portal vein thrombus. No major adverse events were identified. Two (5.3%) patients regressed from a Child-Pugh classification of A to B. The balloon-occluded alternate infusion transarterial chemoembolization treatment achieved a 22.0% complete response (CR) rate and a 73.2% ORR (95% confidence interval [CI], 57.9%–84.4%). In a retrospective analysis of 23 patients with HCCs above the up-to-7 criteria, the CR rate and ORR of the balloon-occluded alternate infusion transarterial chemoembolization were 21.7% and 82.6% (95% CI, 62.3%–93.6%), respectively.ConclusionsBalloon-occluded alternate infusion transarterial chemoembolization is safe and effective for achieving a high ORR while preserving liver function.     

Radiofrequency Ablation versus Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Awaiting Liver Transplant: An Analysis of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients

PurposeTo evaluate differences in waitlist mortality and dropout in liver transplant candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who undergo radiofrequency (RF) ablation versus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).Material and MethodsFrom 2004 to 2013, 11,824 patients with HCC in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients who underwent RF ablation or TACE were included and followed until December 31, 2019, or 5 years, whichever came first, and were stratified by the Milan criteria. Competing risk and Cox regression analyses to compare waitlist mortality and dropout were performed using adjusted hazard ratios (asHRs, with RF ablation group as reference). Regression models were adjusted for age, race, sex, calculated Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, tumor size, and number.ResultsThere was no difference in waitlist mortality and dropout for patients outside the Milan criteria (n = 1,226) who underwent TACE (19.2%) or RF ablation (19.0%) (asHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79–1.03). There was also no difference for patients inside the Milan criteria (n = 10,598) in waitlist mortality/dropout (TACE 13.4% vs RF ablation 12.9%) (asHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.79–2.09). A subgroup analysis within the Milan criteria demonstrated no difference between TACE and RF ablation treatments in patients with a single tumor of ≤3 cm (asHR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77–1.10), with a single tumor of >3 cm (asHR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.79–1.34), or with >1 tumor (asHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.72–1.09).ConclusionsUsing the national registry data, no difference was found in waitlist mortality and dropout for transplant candidates with HCC who received TACE versus RF ablation.     

Stress Conditions Induced by Locoregional Therapies Stimulate Enrichment and Proliferation of Liver Cancer Stem Cells

PurposeThis study tested the hypothesis that stress conditions that simulated percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA), transarterial embolization (TAE), or transarterial chemoembolization stimulated enrichment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cancer stem cells (hCSCs) and that hCSC inhibitors can suppress this effect.Materials and MethodsHuman HCC cell lines HepG2 and PLC/PRF/5 were subjected to a 46.5°C heat bath for 10 minutes or to 1% hypoxia for 72 hours without fetal bovine serum and with or without doxorubicin. Cells were then treated with a β-catenin inhibitor (FH535 or XAV939), a PI3 kinase inhibitor (Ly294002), or niclosamide, a US Food and Drug Administration-approved antihelminthic drug that acts as a mitochondrial decoupler and mixed inhibitor. Surviving cells were analyzed for hCSC markers by flow cytometry, for stemness by colony-forming assay or sphere-forming assay, and for proliferative capacity by MTT assay (where MTT is 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-Yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide). Expression of proteins related to CSC renewal and proliferation were analyzed by immunoblotting and immunostaining.ResultsConditions that simulated PTA, TAE, and transarterial chemoembolization resulted in an enrichment of cells bearing hCSC markers (CD133, CD44, and EpCAM). Cells surviving heat stress exhibited higher colony- or sphere-forming capacity and a greater proliferative state. These effects could be suppressed by niclosamide and inhibitors of β-catenin and PI3 kinase.ConclusionsStress conditions induced by locoregional therapies stimulated hCSC enrichment and proliferation, which could be suppressed by niclosamide and inhibitors of pathways important for hCSC renewal. Future studies will determine whether combining locoregional therapies with adjuvant hCSC inhibitors reduces HCC recurrence.     

Transarterial Chemoembolization in a Woodchuck Model of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PurposeTo assess the feasibility of transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting embolic (DEE) microspheres in a woodchuck model of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and MethodsNine woodchucks were studied: 4 normal animals and 5 animals infected with woodchuck hepatitis virus in which HCC had developed. Three animals with HCC underwent multidetector CT. A 3-F sheath was introduced into the femoral artery, and the hepatic arteries were selectively catheterized with 2.0–2.4-F microcatheters. Normal animals underwent diagnostic angiography and bland embolization. Animals with HCC underwent DEE transarterial chemoembolization with 70–150-μm radiopaque microspheres loaded with 37.5 mg doxorubicin per milliliter. Cone-beam CT and multidetector CT were performed. Following euthanasia, explanted livers underwent micro-CT, histopathologic examination, and fluorescence imaging of doxorubicin.ResultsThe tumors were hypervascular and supplied by large-caliber tortuous vessels, with arteriovenous shunts present in 2 animals. There was heterogeneous enhancement on multidetector CT with areas of necrosis. Six tumors were identified. The most common location was the right medial lobe (n = 3). Mean tumor volume was 30.7 cm³ ± 12.3. DEE chemoembolization of tumors was achieved. Excluding the 2 animals with arteriovenous shunts, the mean volume of DEE microspheres injected was 0.49 mL ± 0.17. Fluorescence imaging showed diffusion of doxorubicin from the DEE microspheres into the tumor.ConclusionsWoodchuck HCC shares imaging appearances and biologic characteristics with human HCC. Selective catheterization and DEE chemoembolization may similarly be performed. Woodchucks may be used to model interventional therapies and possibly characterize radiologic–pathologic correlations.     

Transarterial Radioembolization versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Percutaneous Ablation for Unresectable,Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma of ≥3 cm: A Propensity Score–Matched Study

PurposeTo compare the safety and effectiveness of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting embolic agents combined with percutaneous ablation (transarterial chemoembolization [TACE] + ablation) in the treatment of treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of ≥3 cm.Materials and MethodsTwenty-nine patients with treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary HCC of ≥3 cm received combined TACE + ablation, and 40 patients received TARE at a single institution. Local tumor response, tumor progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, need for reintervention, bridge to transplant, and major complications were compared. Clinical variables and outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsBefore PSM, patients who underwent TARE had a larger tumor size (3.7 vs 5.5 cm; P = .0005) and were older (61.5 vs 69.3 years; P = .0014). After PSM, there was no difference in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups, with the mean tumor sizes measuring 3.9 and 4.1 cm in the TACE + ablation and TARE cohorts, respectively. After PSM (n = 19 in each group), no statistically significant difference was observed in local radiological response (disease control rates, 100% vs 94.7%; P = .31), survival (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28–1.80; P = .469), PFS (SHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.21–1.71; P = .342), bridge to transplant (21.1% vs 31.6%, P = .46), and major adverse event rates (15.8% vs 10.5%, P = .63) between the 2 groups. The mean total number of locoregional interventions was higher in the TACE + ablation cohort (1.9 vs 1.3 sessions, P = .02), with an earlier median reintervention trend (SHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.20–1.32; P = .167).ConclusionsThe present study showed that TARE and the combination of TACE and ablation are comparable in safety and effectiveness for treating treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary HCC of ≥3 cm.     

Natural History of Incidental Enhancing Nodules on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography during Transarterial Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PurposeTo evaluate the natural history of incidental enhancing nodules (IENs) on contrast-enhanced cone-beam computed tomography (CT) during transarterial treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Material and MethodsA single-center retrospective analysis of 100 patients with HCC who underwent contrast-enhanced cone-beam CT prior to transarterial treatment from August 2015 to June 2019 was performed. Inclusion criteria were patients with segmental distribution sublobar HCC, contrast-enhanced cone-beam CT of the target lesion and nontarget liver parenchyma, and follow-up cross-sectional imaging. Patients with IENs ≥3 mm that did not meet imaging criteria for HCC were analyzed. Exclusion criteria included biphenotypic tumors and IEN present inside the treated area of the liver.ResultsFifty-six patients demonstrated 154 IENs on contrast-enhanced cone-beam CT, of which 13 IENs (8.5%) progressed to HCC. The mean primary tumor size was 29 mm (range: 10.2–189 mm). Ten patients had ≥4 IENs, and 46 patients had 1–3 IENs. The mean IEN size was 6.8 mm (range: 3.0–16.3 mm). The median follow-up interval after contrast-enhanced cone-beam CT was 282 days (interquartile range: 143–522). Increased alpha-fetoprotein before treatment (≥15.5 ng/mL, P = .035), having ≥4 IENs (P = .020), and hepatitis C virus (P = .015) were significantly correlated with IEN progression to HCC. No statistically significant differences were identified in baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, targeted HCC characteristics (size, macrovascular invasion, infiltrative pattern, enhancement pattern, and satellite lesions), and IEN size between those with IEN progression to HCC and those without.ConclusionsMost IENs of ≥3 mm on contrast-enhanced cone-beam CT in patients with segmental distribution sublobar HCC do not progress to HCC. Patients with segmental distribution sublobar HCC with ≥4 IENs, alpha-fetoprotein elevation (≥15.5 ng/mL), or hepatitis C virus have an increased risk of IEN progression to HCC.     

Robot-Assisted Transarterial Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using a Coaxial Microcatheter Driving Controller-Responder Robot System: Clinical Pilot Study

PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility and safety of robot-assisted transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using a new coaxial microcatheter driving controller-responder robot (CRR) system.Materials and MethodsA single-center prospective pilot study approved by the institutional review board was conducted using this CRR developed after analyzing 20 cases of conventional TACE procedures from May to October 2021. The study included 10 patients with HCCs: 5 (median age, 72 years; range, 64–73 years) underwent robot-assisted TACE, and 5 (median age, 57 years; range, 44–76 years) underwent conventional TACE for comparison. The feasibility and safety of robot-assisted TACE were evaluated by assessing the technical success, procedure time, adverse event rate, radiation dose, and early tumor response.ResultsThe entire TACE procedure was divided into 30 steps, of which 8 could be robotized. In robot-assisted TACE, technical success was achieved in 4 (80%) of 5 patients. No procedure-related adverse event was observed. The median procedure time was 56 minutes. At the 1-month follow-up, 3 of the 4 patients showed a complete or partial response after robot-assisted TACE. The median radiation doses for the operator and patients were 0.4 and 2,167.5 μSv in robot-assisted TACE and 53.2 and 2,989.7 μSv in conventional TACE, respectively.ConclusionsRobot-assisted TACE using a new CRR system was feasible and safe for the treatment of HCC and could remarkably decrease radiation exposure for the operators.     

Survival Analysis Using Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) Grade for Patients Treated with Drug-Eluting Embolic Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PurposeThe albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade has been established as an improved predictor of survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with conventional transarterial chemoembolization and yttrium-90 radioembolization. The purpose of the study was to investigate the utility of ALBI grade in prognosticating outcomes in patients with HCC treated with drug-eluting embolic (DEE) transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).Materials and MethodsA single-center retrospective review was performed to compare the efficacy of ALBI grade and Child-Pugh (CP) classification in predicting the survival of patients with HCC receiving DEE-TACE. A total of 303 patients with HCC were identified who had received DEE-TACE without concomitant locoregional therapy within 30 days. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methods and censored for curative therapy. Survival curves were stratified based on the ALBI grade, CP class, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and presence of ascites. The discriminatory ability of survival curves was calculated by C-Index.ResultsKaplan-Meier survival curves stratified by the ALBI grade produced distinct, nonoverlapping curves (P < .001), showing greater discriminatory ability than the CP classification (C-index = 0.568 and 0.545, respectively). The substratification of the BCLC stage by the ALBI grade yielded greater discriminatory ability than the substratification by the CP classification (C-index = 0.573 and 0.565, respectively). For patients with BCLC stage B, the substratification by the ALBI grade yielded distinct curves, whereas the substratification by the CP classification did not (P = .011 and P = .379, respectively).ConclusionsALBI grade showed improved discriminatory ability compared with CP classification in differentiating overall survival among patients with HCC receiving DEE-TACE. Furthermore, ALBI grade was effective in substratifying survival among patients categorized as CP class A and patients with BCLC stage B, whereas CP classification was not effective.     

Hypersensitivity Reactions to Transarterial Chemoembolization with Cisplatin and Ethiodized Oil: A Retrospective Cohort Study

PurposeTo assess the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) and risk factors in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have undergone transarterial chemoemblization (TACE) with cisplatin–ethiodized oil emulsion.Materials and MethodsBetween September 2014 and December 2019, patients with HCC in the authors’ institution undergoing TACE with cisplatin–ethiodized oil emulsion were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging data (including age, sex, etiology of HCC, serum bilirubin, albumin, alpha-fetoprotein, prothrombin time, dose of cisplatin, and details of TACE procedure) and data on procedural complications were retrieved from the registry of TACE. The incidence of HSRs was calculated, and variables were compared between the patient groups with and without HSRs. Predictive factors were analyzed using binary logistic regression.ResultsA total of 882 TACE procedures were involved in 257 patients with HCC. The median number of TACE procedures performed per patient was 3 (range, 1–23). The median dose of cisplatin per TACE session was 4.58 mg (range, 0.42–21 mg), and the median accumulated dose of cisplatin per patient was 15.42 mg (range, 0.52–125 mg). HSRs were identified in 22 (2.49%) of 882 procedures (17 [6.61%] of 257 patients). The median number of TACE procedures performed in these patients was 2.5 (range, 1–17). The median dose of cisplatin per TACE session was 5.42 mg (range, 0.63–20 mg), and the median accumulated dose of cisplatin per patient was 18.44 mg (range, 3.33–47.99 mg). Upon binary logistic regression analysis, parameters that showed statistically significant and independent association with HSRs included performance of ≥6 TACE procedures (odds ratio, 3.773; P = .012).ConclusionsPerformance of ≥6 TACE procedures was found to be independently associated with the incidence of HSRs. Patients undergoing multiple TACE procedures should be monitored closely for HSRs.     

Safety and Efficacy of Locoregional Treatment during Immunotherapy with Nivolumab for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study of 41 Interventions in 29 Patients

PurposeTo assess the safety of locoregional treatment (LRT) combined with nivolumab for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and MethodsA single-center retrospective review included 29 patients undergoing 41 LRTs—transarterial chemoembolization or yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization—60 days before or concurrently with nivolumab. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory values and adverse events were reviewed before and after nivolumab initiation and after each LRT. Treatment response and time to progression were assessed using Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Clinical events, including nivolumab termination, death, and time of last follow-up, were assessed.ResultsOver a median nivolumab course of 8.1 months (range, 1.0–30) with a median of 14.2 2-week cycles (range, 1–53), predominantly Child–Pugh A (22/29) patients—12 Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) B and 17 BCLC C—underwent 20 transarterial chemoembolization and 21 transarterial radioembolization LRTs at a median of 67 days (range, 48–609) after nivolumab initiation. Ten patients underwent multiple LRTs. During a median follow-up of 11.5 months (range, 1.8–35.1), no grade III/IV adverse events attributable to nivolumab were observed. There were five instances of grade III/IV hypoalbuminemia or hyperbilirubinemia within 3 months after LRT. There were no nivolumab-related deaths, and 30-day mortality after LRT was 0%.ConclusionsLRTs performed concurrently with nivolumab immunotherapy demonstrate an acceptable safety profile in patients with intermediate and advanced HCC.     

Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Increased Risk of Immediate Progressive Disease following Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PurposeTo demonstrate that patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and elevated baseline neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have a significantly greater risk of progressive disease following initial transarterial chemoembolization.Materials and MethodsA total of 190 HCC patients (149 male/41 female) treated with transarterial chemoembolization between July 2013 and July 2017 were reviewed. Mean patient age was 62. Child-Pugh grades were 132 A, 61 B, and 4 C. Tracked criteria included etiology of cirrhosis, tumor number, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer score, diameter of the largest 2 tumors, and presence of portal vein thrombosis. Complete blood count with differential before the procedure was used for NLR calculation. Follow-up imaging was performed 2 months after treatment. The modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors were used to assess response. The association between baseline NLR and tumor response (ordinal modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors categories) on 2-month follow-up imaging was evaluated using the proportional odds logistic regression model.ResultsA total of 194 patients (76.6%) patients had a preprocedural NLR <3.5, and 59 (23%) patients had a preprocedural NLR ≥3.5. There was a statistically significant association between baseline NLR and immediate progression on 2-month follow-up imaging (mean NLR 4.10, 2.76, 2.72, and 2.48 for progressive and stable disease and partial and complete response, respectively; odds ratio 2.1, P = .04). NLR (P = .021) and tumor multiplicity (P = .011) predicted progressive disease at 2-month imaging.ConclusionsElevated baseline NLR is associated with higher rates of HCC tumor progression at 2-month follow-up imaging after transarterial chemoembolization.