Ticagrelor: a review of its use in the management of acute coronary syndromes

Ticagrelor (Brilique?; Brilinta?), a cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidine antiplatelet agent, is the first oral antagonist of the P2Y(12) receptor to offer reversible receptor binding. It is indicated in the EU for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in adults with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) [unstable angina pectoris, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] or non-STEMI), including those managed medically or with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Ticagrelor provides selective and reversible inhibition of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation, with a faster onset and offset of action than that of clopidogrel, and is effective in the treatment of patients with ACS, with or without ST-segment elevation. In the large, randomized, double-blind, multicentre PLATO trial conducted in this patient population, ticagrelor was more effective than clopidogrel in terms of preventing ischaemic events over 12 months, providing a significantly lower risk of the primary composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke or death from vascular causes, and was associated with an overall mortality benefit. The risk of major bleeding with ticagrelor, including bleeds related to CABG, did not differ from that seen with clopidogrel in this study, although ticagrelor was associated with more non-CABG-related major bleeds and fatal intracranial bleeding, albeit the latter bleeding events were rare. Further long-term and comparative efficacy and tolerability data are required to definitively position ticagrelor with respect to other antiplatelet agents, including prasugrel. However, the clinical data currently available indicate that ticagrelor is a promising option for the treatment of patients with ACS and may be of particular use in those at high risk of ischaemic events or unresponsive to clopidogrel.     

Thienopyridines and Other ADP-Receptor Antagonists

Platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibition plays a pivotal role in preventing thrombotic vascular events in patients with ACS and in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among the P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, the group of thienopyridines include ticlopidine, clopidogrel and prasugrel, all of which are orally administered prodrugs leading to irreversible P2Y12 receptor inhibition. Non-thienopyridine derivatives including ticagrelor, cangrelor and elinogrel do not require metabolic activation and lead to a reversible P2Y12 receptor inhibition in contrast to thienopyridines. The extend of platelet inhibition is subject to the administered antiplatelet agent and influenced by individual genetic and clinical factors. Insufficient platelet inhibition, termed high platelet reactivity (HPR) is associated with an increased risk for ischemic events after PCI whereas exceeding platelet inhibition results in an increased bleeding risk. Pharmacologic properties and clinical outcome data differ substantially between the existing P2Y12 receptor inhibitors. Whether individualized antiplatelet treatment incorporating different P2Y12 receptor inhibitors improves patients' clinical outcomes warrants further investigation.     

Antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes

INTRODUCTION: Antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with acute coronary syndromes in the acute phase and in long-term management. Over the last few years, new antiplatelet drugs have been developed and the therapeutic landscape has rapidly evolved. AREAS COVERED: We review the available evidence and most recent data concerning all of the principal classes of antiplatelet agents, including aspirin, thienopyridines and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, as well the impact of the new drugs prasugrel and ticagrelor and the available data concerning cangrelor, elinogrel and PAR-1 inhibitors (still under development). EXPERT OPINION: This review considers the management of antiplatelet therapy in the light of recent advances, highlighting how to identify patients who will receive the greatest benefit from the older and newer agents, and underscoring the importance of carefully balancing the risks of ischaemia and bleeding in order to improve clinical outcomes. Finally, the paper discusses the potential role of functional and genetic tests in guiding the choice of antiplatelet therapy in a future perspective of 'personalised medicine'.     

Ticagrelor for acute coronary syndrome?

Current guidelines from the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommend antiplatelet therapy comprising aspirin plus either clopidogrel or prasugrel for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, such dual therapy increases the likelihood of bleeding compared to that with aspirin alone. Ticagrelor (Brilique - Astra-Zeneca) is a new oral antiplatelet drug recently licensed in the UK (since publication of the NICE guidelines) for use with aspirin in patients with ACS, including those managed medically or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Here we review the place of ticagrelor in the management of people with ACS, and whether it offers advantages over standard therapy in terms of greater efficacy or lower likelihood of bleeding complications.     

New perspectives in antiplatelet therapy

Platelet activation is a complex mechanism of response to vascular injury and atherothrombotic disease, leading to thrombus formation. A wide variety of surface receptors -integrins, leucine-rich family receptors, G protein coupled receptors, tyrosine kinase receptors- and intraplatelet molecules support and regulate platelet activation. They are potential targets of antiplatelet therapy for the prevention and treatment of arterial thrombosis. Despite the overall clinical benefit of established antiplatelet drugs targeting cyclooxigenase-1 (COX-1), glycoprotein integrin αIIbβ3, and the purinergic P2Y(12) receptor of adenosine diphosphate, a significant proportion of treated patients continue to experience recurrent ischaemic events. This may be in partly attributed to insufficient inhibition of platelet activation. In addition, it should not be underestimated that these drugs are not immune from bleeding complications. The substantial progress in understating the regulation of platelet activation has played a key role in the development of novel antiplatelet agents. Current examples of drug under development and evaluation include: novel P2Y(12) receptor inhibitors (prasugrel, ticagrelor, cangrelor, and elinogrel), thrombin receptor PAR-1 antagonists (vorapaxar, atopaxar), new integrin glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and inhibitors targeting the thromboxane receptor (TP), phosphodiesterases, the collagen receptor glycoprotein VI, and intraplatelet signalling molecules. This review summarizes the mechanisms of action and current clinical evaluation of these novel antiplatelet agents.     

Efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a dangerous and urgent clinical pattern of coronary artery disease. Aspirin and adenosine diphosphate P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists are the standard dual anti‐platelet therapy for patients with ACS. Ticagrelor is a new oral antagonist of the adenosine diphosphate P2Y₁₂ receptor. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel or prasugrel in patients with ACS, obtaining conflicting results. Thus, we conducted a meta‐analysis of these RCTs to determine the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in patients with ACS. Results of the meta‐analysis indicate that ticagrelor decreased the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all‐cause death, but increased the risk of bleeding events. In Asiatic patients, analysis indicates that ticagrelor did not decrease the risk of MACE and all‐cause death, while increasing the risk of bleeding events. Together, this meta‐analysis suggests that ticagrelor was more effective, but less safe than clopidogrel and prasugrel in patients with ACS. Subgroup analysis indicates that ticagrelor was not more effective, although less safe than clopidogrel in Asiatic patients, thus more evidence is needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in Asiatic patients.     

Platelet hyperreactivity and stent thrombosis in patients undergoing coronary stenting

Stent thrombosis (ST) is a rare but very serious event complicating percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures. Both procedure- and patient-related factors, including inadequate platelet inhibition are well known predictors of ST. According to the present guidelines, a dual antiplatelet treatment regimen consisting of aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor such as clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor is routinely administered to ACS patients and to patients undergoing PCI in order to prevent thrombotic vessel occlusions. In recent years, evidence has grown that patients showing high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) under clopidogrel intake exhibit a higher risk for the occurrence of ischemic events including ST. For assessing HPR, different platelet function assays are currently available and have already found their way into routine clinical practice in several centers. Along with this development, more potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitors like prasugrel and ticagrelor are substitutes for clopidogrel in specific circumstances such as in ACS patients or in patients who do not adequately respond to standard clopidogrel treatment. Utilizing platelet function monitoring, patients showing HPR can be identified and an optimized antiplatelet treatment regime can be tailored for these patients. This review paper aims to summarize the important facts in relation to ST and antiplatelet therapy with a particular focus on P2Y12 receptor inhibition and its ex vivo assessment in patients undergoing coronary stent placement.     

Emerging antithrombotic drugs for acute coronary syndrome

Introduction: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) encompasses acute myocardial infarction (MI) and unstable angina. Activation of platelets and coagulation cascade plays a central role in the development of ACS. Over the past decade, there have been substantial improvements in the strategies for secondary prevention of ACS, including the development of more potent oral antiplatelet agents such as prasugrel and ticagrelor. However, therapies with even better efficacy and safety profiles and more rapid onset and offset of action would be desirable.

Areas covered: This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the currently available antithrombotic agents and describes the findings from recent clinical trials of three novel agents; cangrelor (an intravenous P2Y12 receptor antagonist), vorapaxar (protease-activated receptor-1 inhibitor) and rivaroxaban (an oral factor Xa inhibitor).

Expert opinion: Cangrelor appears more promising than clopidogrel when a very rapid onset and reversal of antiplatelet effect is needed. Vorapaxar in addition to standard oral antiplatelet therapy was effective in patients with prior MI, but was not safe in patients with a prior stroke. Low dose rivaroxaban decreased cardiovascular events and mortality in patients post-ACS compared to placebo, although bleeding was increased.     

Antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes

Introduction: Antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with acute coronary syndromes in the acute phase and in long-term management. Over the last few years, new antiplatelet drugs have been developed and the therapeutic landscape has rapidly evolved.

Areas covered: We review the available evidence and most recent data concerning all of the principal classes of antiplatelet agents, including aspirin, thienopyridines and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, as well the impact of the new drugs prasugrel and ticagrelor and the available data concerning cangrelor, elinogrel and PAR-1 inhibitors (still under development).

Expert opinion: This review considers the management of antiplatelet therapy in the light of recent advances, highlighting how to identify patients who will receive the greatest benefit from the older and newer agents, and underscoring the importance of carefully balancing the risks of ischaemia and bleeding in order to improve clinical outcomes. Finally, the paper discusses the potential role of functional and genetic tests in guiding the choice of antiplatelet therapy in a future perspective of ‘personalised medicine’.     

Dyspnea and Reversibility Profile of P2Y12 Antagonists: Systematic Review of New Antiplatelet Drugs

Background

Dyspnea has been consecutively reported in some trials evaluating new P2Y₁₂ inhibitors.

Objective

We aimed to review and quantify the global risk of dyspnea of recent P2Y₁₂ inhibitor drugs, and evaluate its association with the reversibility profile of P2Y₁₂ inhibitors.

Methods

A database search (March 2013) retrieved randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing new antiplatelet drugs (ticagrelor, prasugrel, cangrelor, elinogrel) with clopidogrel. The primary outcome was the incidence of dyspnea. Placebo-controlled trials were excluded. Meta-analysis was performed and estimates were expressed as risk ratio (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs). Dyspnea incidence was evaluated according to the reversibility profile of P2Y₁₂ antagonists.

Results

We found eight RCTs including 41,289 patients. Prasugrel was not associated with an increased risk of dyspnea (RR 1.09, 95 % CI 0.93–1.27), whereas ticagrelor (RR 1.95, 95 % CI 1.37–2.77), cangrelor (RR 2.42, 95 % CI 1.36–4.33), and elinogrel (RR 3.25, 95 % CI 1.57–6.72) showed an increased risk of dyspnea. Reversible inhibitors significantly increased the risk of dyspnea compared with the irreversible inhibitor, prasugrel, through adjusted indirect comparison (RR 1.99, 95 % CI 1.40–2.82).

Conclusions

The reversible P2Y₁₂ antagonists ticagrelor, cangrelor, and elinogrel have an increased incidence of dyspnea in increasing order when compared with irreversible P2Y₁₂ inhibitors such as clopidogrel or prasugrel.     

Novel Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndromes: What is New in the Pipeline?

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are triggered by enhanced platelet activation and aggregation. Hence, a cornerstone of successful secondary prevention in ACS is an effective platelet inhibition. Additionally, coronary interventions (PCI) lead to even increased artherothrombotic risks, another challenge in preventing recurrent events including stent thrombosis. Promising platelet targets were characterized and novel molecules were developed that are currently under investigation. Intensified antiplatelet therapy includes the risk of major bleeding which itself increases the mortality rate. Previous strategies of antiplatelet therapy were based on an "one-size fits all" concept. However, there has been evidence that variability of drug response exists and represents a clinically relevant issue. This observation is in line with results of randomized clinical trials that standard-of-care antiplatelet therapy is not sufficient to reduce cardiovascular (CV) risk in certain subgroups of ACS patients. In the last years, novel antiplatelet substances have entered the clinical arena and others are currently under investigation in phase II and III clinical trials. These include 3rd generation thienopyridine (prasugrel, elinogrel), ATP analogs (Ticagrelor, cangrelor), and non-ADP-receptor blocking antiplatelet substances like thrombin receptor antagonists. These agents have shown promising results in pilot studies and recent randomized trials. As the prevention of atherothrombotic risk is at the expense of bleeding risk, it will be a future task to clearly define patients' groups and subsets of ACS for the best net clinical benefit. This article focuses on the role of novel antiplatelet substances to reduce CV risk in ACS, discuss clinical implications and their potential future role.     

Developing drugs for use before,during and soon after percutaneous coronary intervention

Introduction: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a milestone for treating coronary artery disease (CAD). Antithrombotic therapy is essential to prevent ischemic complications, including the microvascular no-reflow, while minimizing bleeding events.

Areas covered: This overview discusses available and developing drugs for PCI including anticoagulants, antiplatelets and treatment of no-reflow.

Expert opinion: For years unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been the unique anticoagulant to be used before and during PCI. Enoxaparin showed similar efficacy and safety, yet, based on recent trials, bivalirudin has been shown to have some benefits, particularly for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The evidence concerning new anticoagulants is still preliminary, except for new oral anticoagulants, particularly rivaroxaban that showed intriguing findings and is currently under investigation. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the standard of care after PCI, but new developments have recently emerged. Indeed, ticagrelor and prasugrel are currently recommended over clopidogrel due to their significant reduction of ischemic events in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) whereas clopidogrel remains the choice in stable CAD. Among new agents, vorapaxar and cangrelor showed positive but limited evidence and might be considered at least in selected patients. Conversely, evidence on effective treatments for no-reflow remains limited and would require future dedicated research.     

Intracellular signaling as a potential target for antiplatelet therapy

Three classes of inhibitors of platelet aggregation have demonstrated substantial clinical benfits. Aspirin acts by irreversibly inhibiting COX-1 and therefore blocking the synthesis of proaggregatory thromboxane A (2) (TxA(2)). The indirect acting (ticlopidine, clopidogrel, prasugrel) and the direct acting (ticagrelor) antagonists of P2Y(12) block the thrombus stabilizing activity of ADP. Parenteral GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors directly block platelet-platelet interactions. Despite well-established benefits, all antiplatelet agents have important limitations: increased bleeding and gastrointestinal toxicities (aspirin), high incidence of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (ticlopidine), potentially nonresponders (clopidogrel), severe bleeding (prasugrel, GP IIb-IIIa antagonists) and "complicated" relationships with aspirin ticagrelor). In this chapter, we present the genetic and pharmacological evidence that supports the development and expectations associated with novel antiplatelet strategies directed at intrasignaling pathways.     

A comprehensive comparative review of adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists

INTRODUCTION: Thrombosis risk necessitates dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and an adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist, in patients who have acute coronary syndrome. Current guidelines emphasize the critical role of dual antiplatelet therapy in both medical management and invasive strategy, especially in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. With the availability of multiple ADP-receptor antagonists, it is crucial to select the most appropriate agent for each patient. AREAS COVERED: The pertinent trials were identified through a MEDLINE search, in addition to a manual search from the articles retrieved. This review examines the differences between clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor in terms of their pharmacological/pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy, drug interactions and safety parameters. EXPERT OPINION: Prasugrel and ticagrelor exhibit greater platelet inhibition and superior efficacy compared with clopidogrel, at the expense of higher bleeding risk. Prasugrel and ticagrelor should be preferred over clopidogrel in patients who are at a high risk of thrombotic events with low risk of bleeding. Additionally, these two agents may offer advantage over clopidogrel in those patients who might have risk for drug resistance due to CYP2C19 polymorphism. In selecting the ideal agent for patients, clinicians should tailor the antiplatelet regimen by considering individual risk factors and medication characteristics.     

P2Y12 receptor inhibitors: an evolution in drug design to prevent arterial thrombosis

Introduction: P2Y12 inhibitors are a critical component of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), which is the superior strategy to prevent arterialthrombosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and undergoing stent implantation..

Areas covered: Basic science articles, clinical studies, and reviews from 1992–2017 were searched using Pubmed library to collet impactful literature. After an introduction to the purinergic receptor biology, this review summarizes current knowledge on P2Y12 receptor inhibitors. Furthermore, we describe the subsequent improvements of next-generation P2Y12 receptor inhibitors facing the ambivalent problem of bleeding events versus prevention of arterial thrombosis in a variety of clinical settings. Therefore, we summarize data from relevant preclinical and clinical trials of currently approved P2Y12 receptor inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, cangrelor) and provide strategies of drug switching and management of bleeding events.

Expert opinion: An enormous amount of pharmacologic and clinical data is available for the application of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors. Today prasugrel, ticagrelor and clopidogrel are the standard of care drugs during dual antiplatelet therapy for ACS patients, but have considerable rates of bleeding. Recent and future clinical trials will provide evidence for subsequent escalation and de-escalation strategies of P2Y12 receptor inhibition. These data may pave the way for an evidence-based, individualized P2Y12 receptor inhibitor therapy.     

Pharmacokinetic,pharmacodynamic and clinical profile of novel antiplatelet drugs targeting vascular diseases

Platelet inhibitors are the mainstay treatment for patients with vascular diseases. The current ‘gold standard’ antiplatelet agent clopidogrel has several pharmacological and clinical limitations that have prompted the search for more effective platelet antagonists. The candidates include various blockers of the purinergic P2Y12 receptor such as prasugrel, an oral irreversible thienopyridine; two adenosine triphosphate analogues that bind reversibly to the P2Y12 receptor: ticagrelor (oral) and cangrelor (intravenous); elinogrel, a direct-acting reversible P2Y12 receptor inhibitor (the only antiplatelet compound that can be administered both intravenously and orally); BX 667, an orally active and reversible small-molecule P2Y12 receptor antagonist; SCH 530348, SCH 205831, SCH 602539 and E5555, highly selective and orally active antagonists on the protease-activated receptor 1. A number of drugs also hit new targets: terutroban, an oral, selective and specific inhibitor of the thromboxane receptor; ARC1779, a second-generation, nuclease resistant aptamer which inhibits von Willebrand factor-dependent platelet aggregation; ALX-0081, a bivalent humanized nanobody targeting the GPIb binding site of von Willebrand factor and AJW200, an IgG4 monoclonal antibody of von Willebrand factor. The pharmacology and clinical profiles of new platelet antagonists indicate that they provide more consistent, more rapid and more potent platelet inhibition than agents currently used. Whether these potential advantages will translate into clinical advantages will require additional comparisons in properly powered, randomized, controlled trials.     

Ticagrelor: Positive,negative and misunderstood properties as a new antiplatelet agent

相似文献   

Vorapaxar: a novel protease-activated receptor-1 inhibitor

INTRODUCTION: Platelet activation and reactivity are pivotal for both acute and chronic atherothrombotic event occurrences. AREAS COVERED: Only 20% relative risk (～ 2% absolute risk) reduction associated with newer P2Y(12) receptor blocker therapy such as prasugrel and ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel indicates that dual antiplatelet therapy may be associated with a ceiling effect in attenuating platelet-mediated ischemic event occurrence and that residual ischemic event occurrences are mediated by other pathways that are unblocked by current antiplatelet therapy. Therefore, inhibition of the thrombin-protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 interaction may provide additional benefits in attenuating ischemic event occurrence in selected patients. There are two major PAR-1 blockers are under investigations - vorapaxar and atopaxar. In preclinical and Phase I - II studies, inhibition of thrombin-mediated platelet activation by a PAR-1 inhibitor, in general, has added to the antithrombotic efficacy of aspirin and clopidogrel without increasing bleeding. However, intracranial hemorrhage in patients with a history of stroke associated with vorapaxar and hepatic toxicity associated with atopaxar are important concerns. EXPERT OPINION: At this time, the specific role of PAR-1 inhibitor in the settings of percutaneous coronary intervention and acute coronary syndrome, both during the acute setting and as a long-term therapeutic agent, is not clear. Although the PAR-1 inhibitors are associated with less bleeding, its effectiveness as an antithrombotic agent and also side effects are major concerns. Future large-scale trials with goals addressing these concerns are needed to define the specific role of PAR-1 receptor inhibitor.     

Treating acute coronary syndromes with new antiplatelet drugs: the mortality issue with prasugrel and ticagrelor

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are the leading cause of mortality in Western countries. Until a few years ago, the antiplatelet drug to be administered in association with aspirin was indisputably clopidogrel. Recent data from randomized trials conducted in ACS patients have shown that the new oral antiplatelet regimens, prasugrel and ticagrelor, are associated with a significant reduction in cardiovascular events, as compared to clopidogrel. Moreover ticagrelor reduced both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality as compared to clopidogrel in the PLATO trial. However, there are intrinsic differences between the trials design and among the enrolled ACS populations, that make complex the generalization of the mortality results in the whole spectrum of ACS patients. We aimed to provide further insights into the unresolved mortality issues raised in the PLATO and TRITON-TIMI 38 trials, by analysing the effects of ticagrelor and prasugrel in the ACS populations included in the respective trials.     

Review of clopidogrel dose escalation in the current era of potent P2Y12 inhibitors

Dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is the standard of care for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clopidogrel is associated with increased risk of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) compared to ticagrelor and prasugrel. Investigators have therefore sought to “escalate” clopidogrel dosing to overcome HTPR to reduce ischemic/thrombotic events. In this review, we will summarize the evidence for dose escalation in the context of genetic determinants of resistance and platelet function data. We will review contemporary clinical trials that have sought to improve delivery of dual antiplatelet therapy to patients with coronary artery disease and discuss the potential of clopidogrel dose escalation in specific populations.