A double-blind,placebo-controlled immunotherapy dose-response study with standardized cat extract

BACKGROUND: Allergen immunotherapy with doses of cat extract containing approximately 15 microg of the major allergen, Fel d 1, have been proved clinically effective in several double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. However, the maintenance doses used in allergy practice in the United States are often considerably less than this proven dose. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether maintenance immunotherapy with cat dander extract containing 0.6 microg or 3.0 microg of Fel d 1 was more effective than placebo and similar in efficacy to treatment with extracts containing 15.0 microg Fel d 1, immunologic parameters being used as the outcome. METHODS: Twenty-eight cat-allergic patients were randomly entered, 7 in each group, into a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of the immunologic response to treatment with placebo or cat dander extract containing 0.6 microg, 3.0 microg, or 15.0 microg of Fel d 1. Maintenance doses were achieved in 8 visits over a period of 4 weeks through use of a cluster regimen; each subject then received 1 weekly maintenance injection before posttreatment measurements were made. The response to immunotherapy was assessed before immunotherapy and after the first weekly maintenance injection. Studies included responses to titrated skin prick tests to cat extract and an unrelated allergen and serum allergen-specific IgE and IgG4. Titrated nasal challenges were performed with cat extract; measurement of mRNA and secreted cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, and IFN-gamma) was done at 6 hours. Serum cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IFN-gamma) were measured, and flow cytometric analysis of intracellular cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IFN-gamma) was performed. Cat allergen-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation was performed with measurement of cytokines in the supernatant (IL-4, IL-5, IFN-gamma). RESULTS: All 28 subjects completed the study. Significant and dose-dependent differences were encountered in the titrated skin prick tests (P =.008), the cat-specific IgG(4) (P =.01), and the reduction in CD4+/IL-4+ PBMCs on flow cytometry (P =.03). There were no significant differences between placebo and cat dander extract containing Fel d 1 0.6 microg. Both extracts containing 3.0 microg and 15.0 microg produced significant decreases in skin prick test sensitivity (P =.02 and P =.002, respectively). The extracts containing 3.0 microg and 15.0 microg produced significant increases in cat-specific IgG4 (P =.01 and P =.006, respectively). Only the 15.0-microg-per-dose extract produced a significant reduction in the percent of CD4+/IL-4+ PBMCs (P =.003). CONCLUSION: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, a maintenance dose of cat dander extract containing 15.0 microg Fel d 1 produced the most consistent immunologic response. A dose of 3.0 microg reduced skin prick test sensitivity and increased cat-specific IgG4 but did not reduce the circulating CD4+/IL-4+ PBMCs, a change that is likely related to the clinically significant response to allergen immunotherapy. These findings suggest that a maintenance dose of 15.0 microg of Fel d 1 is most apt to be clinically effective for allergen immunotherapy.     

Sublingual immunotherapy in mite-sensitized children with atopic dermatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis often has an allergic component, and immunotherapy may therefore prove beneficial. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in children with atopic dermatitis. METHODS: Children age 5 to 16 years with atopic dermatitis (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis [SCORAD] > 7) and sensitization to dust mites alone, without food allergy or chronic asthma, were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study and stratified according to disease severity. SLIT or placebo was given for 18 months in addition to standard therapy. SCORAD, visual analog scale, and rescue medication consumption were recorded at 3-month intervals. RESULTS: Fifty-six children were enrolled, and 28 were allocated to SLIT. Forty-eight completed the study, with 2 dropouts in the active and 6 in the placebo group. The difference from baseline in the SCORAD was significant (P = .025) between the 2 groups starting from month 9. Similarly, there was a significant reduction in the use of medications only in the active group. A trend toward significance was seen for the visual analog score only in the active group versus baseline (P = .07). A significant difference in the considered parameters was found only in patients with a mild-moderate disease, whereas severe patients had only a marginal benefit. SLIT had to be discontinued in 2 patients because of exacerbation of dermatitis. CONCLUSION: Sublingual immunotherapy to dust mite improves mild-moderate atopic dermatitis. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Sublingual immunotherapy may represent an additional therapeutic tool for the treatment of extrinsic atopic dermatitis in properly selected children.     

Sublingual-swallow immunotherapy with standardized 3-grass pollen extract: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is accepted as a safe and effective route for the treatment of grass pollen allergy, but clarification of its clinical and biological efficacy requires more study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and compliance of SLIT with a standardized 3-grass pollen extract in patients with grass pollen seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, with or without mild asthma. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind study included 127 patients (aged 12-41 years; mean age, 24.9 years) with grass pollen seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, with or without mild asthma. They received either SLIT with a high-dose, standardized, 3-grass pollen extract or placebo for 10 months before and during the grass pollen season. The efficacy evaluation compared weekly clinical scores (defined as the sum of the symptom score and rescue medication score) to measure rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma for the first 8 weeks of the pollen season. We also evaluated safety and compliance and measured changes in anti-Dactylis specific IgG4 antibody levels. RESULTS: There was a trend in favor of the study group in the mean adjusted clinical score. The groups were not comparable on inclusion (P = .02): the SLIT group included more subjects with asthma and had a higher mean IgG4 serum level. Additional exploration according to subgroups with and without asthma found that among the patients without asthma, the SLIT group had a significantly better clinical score (P = .045). Anti-Dactylis specific IgG4 levels increased significantly in the SLIT group. CONCLUSION: SLIT with a standardized, high-dose, 3-grass pollen extract is safe and significantly improves the clinical score in patients with hay fever and without asthma during the pollen season.     

Specific immunotherapy with a standardized latex extract in allergic workers: a double-blind,placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND: Preventive measures have been proposed to reduce the risk of sensitization to natural rubber latex (NRL), but this is not always feasible. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of specific immunotherapy with a standardized latex extract in sensitized workers. METHODS: Twenty-four patients allergic to NRL with contact urticaria (n = 8) and rhinitis or asthma (n = 16) were included (16 in the active group and 8 in the placebo group). Treatment started in a cluster immunotherapy protocol, with injections every week for 3 months and then every other week for another 3 months. RESULTS: Patients in the active group had significantly lower values than patients in the placebo group in skin terms of reactivity to NRL (P <.01), rubbing test results (P =.047), and latex glove use test results (P =.046) after 6 months of treatment. There were no significant differences between the active and placebo groups in symptom scores, use of medication, self-assessment, or methacholine test results either before or after treatment. Differences in nasal and bronchial symptoms during specific inhalation challenges (P = not significant and P =.05, respectively) were observed in favor of the active group. In the active group 32 systemic reactions were observed (8% of doses), mostly during the build-up period, being more frequent in patients with respiratory symptoms (P =.004). All reactions responded promptly to treatment. CONCLUSION: Clinical efficacy was shown mainly on cutaneous symptoms, although an improvement in rhinitis and asthma symptoms was also observed during specific inhalation challenges. Latex-specific immunotherapy might be a useful approach for the treatment of latex allergy in sensitized workers.     

Hazelnut allergy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge multicenter study

BACKGROUND: Tree nuts are a common cause of food allergy in Europe. However, few studies deal with real food allergy to hazelnuts in subjects believed to be allergic to this food. OBJECTIVE: We sought to select subjects with a history of allergic reactions on ingestion of hazelnut and determine how many of these have true allergy by means of the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). METHODS: Eighty-six subjects with a history of symptoms after hazelnut ingestion were recruited from 3 allergy centers (Milan, Zurich, and Copenhagen). All subjects underwent skin prick tests (SPTs) with aeroallergens and hazelnut, as well as having their specific hazelnut IgE levels determined. Diagnosis of clinical relevant food allergy was made on the basis of the DBPCFC. RESULTS: Sixty-seven (77.9%) of 86 subjects had a positive DBPCFC result; 8 were placebo responders, and 11 were nonresponders. Of the 11 nonresponders, 4 had positive open-challenge test results. Of the DBPCFC-positive subjects, 87% also had positive skin test responses to birch pollen extract. Specific IgE determination for hazelnut (positive CAP response >/=0.7 kU/L [ie, class 2]) showed a sensitivity of 0.75, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.92, a specificity of 0.16, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.05. Skin tests with commercial hazelnut extract produced a sensitivity of 0.89, a PPV of 0.92, a specificity of 0.05, and an NPV of 0.05. Skin tests with natural food produced a sensitivity of 0.88, a PPV of 0.94, a specificity of 0.27, and an NPV of 0.15. CONCLUSION: This study shows that hazelnut is an allergenic source that can cause real food allergy, as confirmed by DBPCFC. Skin and IgE tests demonstrated reasonable sensitivity and PPV but a very low specificity and NPV, thus implying that these should not be used to validate the diagnosis of food allergy to hazelnut.     

Effects of a standardized soy extract on hot flushes: a multicenter,double-blind,randomized, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of an oral soy isoflavone extract (Phytosoya) on hot flushes in menopausal women. DESIGN: The study was conducted on outpatients according to a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design. A total of 75 patients in natural or surgical menopause suffering from at least seven hot flushes per day were randomized to receive during 4 months either soy isoflavone extract (total of 70 mg genistin and daidzin per day) or placebo. RESULTS: There is evidence to suggest that 16 weeks of treatment with soy extract can help reduce the mean number of hot flushes per 24 hours in menopausal women. Withdrawals during this trial made it difficult to obtain an unbiased estimate of the true treatment effect, but numerous sensitivity analyses lend support to the suggestion that taking soy extract can be beneficial in the treatment of hot flushes. In particular, women taking soy extract had a 38% reduction in the mean number of hot flushes by week 4 and a 51% reduction by week 8. By the end of week 16, patients taking soy extract had a 61% reduction in their daily hot flushes versus a 21% reduction obtained with the placebo. "Responders" (defined as patients whose hot flushes were reduced by at least 50% at the end of treatment period) were 65.8% in the soy extract group and 34.2% in the placebo group ( < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Soy isoflavone extract may help to reduce the frequency of hot flushes in climacteric women and provides an attractive addition to the choices available for relief of hot flushes.     

Double-blind, placebo-controlled rush immunotherapy with a standardized Alternaria extract

Specific immunotherapy is ineffective with unstandardized mold extracts. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed in 24 patients (5 to 56 years of age) only allergic to Alternaria. The extract was standardized by isoelectric focusing, crossed immunoelectrophoresis, crossed radioimmunoelectrophoresis, RAST inhibition, and skin tests and contained allergen Alternaria major allergen a I and antigen B. Thirteen patients received the active treatment, and 11 received the placebo. Immunotherapy was started by a 2-day rush protocol; maintenance injections were administered for 1 year. The patient's self-evaluation of the treatment was significantly (p less than 0.001) lower in the placebo-treated group. Global symptom-medication scores, including asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis, were significantly (p less than 0.005) lower in the actively treated group. Nasal challenges with Alternaria extract were performed before immunotherapy and after 1 year of treatment. There was no difference in the placebo-treated group and a significantly (p less than 0.01) increased mean provocative dose in the actively treated group. Skin tests were significantly reduced in the actively treated group. Specific IgG increased significantly in the actively treated group and were stable in the placebo-treated group. There was a significant correlation between nasal challenges and nasal symptom-medication scores (p less than 0.03) or the patient's self-evaluation of efficacy (p less than 0.05). This study demonstrated that patients only sensitized to Alternaria benefit from specific immunotherapy with a standardized Alternaria extract.     

Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy with a biologically standardized extract of Ambrosia artemisiifolia pollen: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND: The allergological relevance of Ambrosia in Europe is growing but the efficacy of the injective immunotherapy for this allergen has been documented only in Northern America. OBJECTIVE: We sought to study the safety and efficacy of injective immunotherapy in European patients sensitized to Ambrosia artemisiifolia. METHODS: Thirty-two patients (18 M/14 F, mean age 36.78, range 23-60 years) suffering from rhinoconjunctivitis and/or asthma and sensitized to Ambrosia were enrolled and randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled (DBPC) study lasting 1 year. A maintenance dose corresponding to 7.2 microg of Amb a 1 was administered at 4-week intervals after the build-up. During the second and the third year, all patients were under active therapy in an open fashion. Symptom and medication scores, skin reactivity to Ambrosia (parallel line biological assay), and pollen counts were assessed throughout the trial. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients completed the trial. No severe adverse event was observed. During the DBPC phase, actively treated patients showed an improvement in asthmatic symptoms (P=0.02) and drug (P=0.0068) scores days with asthmatic symptoms (P=0.003), days with rhinitis symptoms (P=0.05), and days with intake of drugs (P=0.0058), as compared to before therapy. No improvement for any of these parameters was detected in the placebo group. Moreover, the number of days with rhinitis and asthma was significantly higher in the placebo as compared to the active group (P=0.048 and P<0.0001, respectively). Patients who switched from placebo to active therapy improved in rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, and drug intake. The skin reactivity decreased significantly (12.2-fold, P=0.0001) in the active group whereas a slight increase (1.07-fold, P=0.87) was observed in the placebo group after the DBPC phase. After switching to active therapy, patients previously under placebo showed a significant decrease of this parameter (4.78-fold, P=0.002). CONCLUSION: Injective immunotherapy is safe and clinically effective in European patients sensitized to Ambrosia.     

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial by the sublingual route of immunotherapy with a standardized grass pollen extract

Fifty-eight patients with well-documented history of seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis caused by grass pollens were allocated randomly on a double-blind basis to receive either sublingual therapy with a solution of purified, standardized allergen preparation (Stallergenes) or a matched placebo for 17 weeks. The assessment of the effect of oral immunotherapy, done with drops of five-grass allergen extract, was on the clinical symptoms and on the medication score of the authorized rescue treatments. The actively treated patients had significantly (P<0.05 to P<0.01) fewer symptoms of rhinitis (sneezing and rhinorrhea) and of conjunctivitis (redness and tears) during the pollen season than the placebo group. Consumption of nasal solution of sodium cromoglycate and of betamethasone and dexchlorpheniramine was significantly less in the desensitized group (P<0.01). Side-effects were negligible. This study concludes that perlingual immunotherapy with grass pollen extract in grass-pollen-sensitive seasonal hay fever and conjunctivitis patients is effective, easy to perform, inexpensive, and safe.     

Wheat allergy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in adults

BACKGROUND: Wheat is believed to be an uncommon cause of food allergy in adults; the number of studies that address IgE mediated wheat allergy in adults is all too few. OBJECTIVE: Determine how many subjects with a history of wheat allergy have real allergy by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge; identify the symptoms manifested during the challenge; determine the lowest provocation dose; determine the performance characteristics of wheat skin prick test and specific IgE; identify subjects with real wheat allergy for potential immunoblotting studies. METHODS: Patients underwent skin test with commercial wheat extract; specific wheat IgE was determined. Subjects were challenged with 25 g wheat. Subjects who were positive to raw wheat challenge underwent cooked wheat challenge. RESULTS: Thirty-seven double-blind placebo-controlled wheat challenges were performed on 27 patients. A total of 13 of 27 (48%) patients had a positive result. Eleven subjects with positive raw wheat challenge underwent cooked wheat challenge: 10 were positive. The provocation dose range was 0.1 to 25 g. Twenty-seven percent of the subjects allergic to wheat had a provocation dose that was < or =1.6 g. CONCLUSION: Wheat causes real food allergy in adults. More than a quarter of the patients allergic to wheat reacted to less than 1.6 g wheat. Specific IgE was more sensitive than skin test for wheat; however, specificity and predictive values were low for both tests. Thus, these tests should not be used to validate diagnosis of wheat allergy.     

Clinical characteristics of soybean allergy in Europe: a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge study

BACKGROUND: Soybean is a relevant allergenic food, but little is known about individual threshold doses in soy allergy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the clinical characteristics of soy allergy in Europe, including a dose-response curve. METHODS: Patients with a history of soy allergy underwent a titrated, double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge. A statistical model was used to calculate the risk of allergic consumers to experience an allergic reaction to soy. Sera were analyzed for specific IgE to soy, peanut, Bet v 1, and Gly m 4. RESULTS: All patients but one responded primarily with subjective symptoms to the challenge followed by objective symptoms in 11 subjects, ranging from rhinitis up to a decrease in blood pressure. Cumulative threshold doses for allergic reactions ranged from 10 mg to 50 g for subjective symptoms and from 454 mg to 50 g for objective symptoms. The pattern of IgE reactivity against proteins with molecular weights of between approximately 10 and 70 kd was highly individual among the patients and did not correlate with the severity of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: When data are fitted by using a normal distribution statistical model, they predict that 1% of patients with soy allergy would react subjectively and objectively with 0.21 and 37.2 mg of soy protein, respectively. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Both the clinical and immunologic basis of soy allergy in Europe are highly complex, which affects the diagnosis of soy allergy and the advice given to patients with soy allergy in regard to risk management.     

Sublingual immunotherapy with a standardized cat dander extract: evaluation of efficacy in a double blind placebo controlled study

BACKGROUND: Little information is available on the clinical efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using extracts derived from mammalian epithelia. OBJECTIVES: To assess clinical efficacy of cat SLIT based on natural exposure challenge test (NCT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty cat allergic patients with rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma were included in a randomized double blind placebo controlled clinical trial of cat SLIT during 1 year. Twenty-five patients received active treatment and 25 placebo. Sublingual immunotherapy efficacy was assessed by natural exposure challenge to a cat in a cat-room and by skin tests. Airborne Fel d 1 levels, symptom scores and peak expiratory flow (PEF) values were monitored. RESULTS: Thirty-three (66%) out of 50 patients completed the treatment. Fel d 1 content of the maximum concentration was 0.51 microg per ml. During the build up phase, the accumulated dose was 1.7 mug of Fel d 1 and during the entire length of the study was 17.1. No adverse reports were reported. The active group showed a marked reduction (62%) in symptoms during the NCT (P < 0.001) with no changes in placebo group. Active group also showed a reduced PEF response to cat exposure (P < 0.05), and an improvement in skin test reactivity to a standardized cat extract (P < 0.05), without significant changes in placebo group. Mean Fel d 1 exposure during the NCT was 6.2 +/- 2.21 ng/m(3). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the cat SLIT used in this study was able to improve cat allergy based on natural exposure challenge.     

A first prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study on the use of a standardized hop extract to alleviate menopausal discomforts

OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy of a hop extract enriched in 8-prenylnaringenin (8-PN, the phytoestrogen in hops, Humulus lupulus L.) on relief of menopausal discomforts. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study over 12 weeks with 67 menopausal women, who were administered a hop extract standardized on 8-PN (100 or 250 microg). The responses were determined by means of a modified Kupperman index (KI) and a patients' questionnaire. RESULTS: All groups, including placebo, showed a significant reduction of the KI both after 6 weeks and after 12 weeks. The hop extract at 100 microg 8-PN was significantly superior to placebo after 6 weeks (P=0.023) but not after 12 weeks (P=0.086). No dose-response relationship could be established, as the higher dose (250 microg) was less active than the lower dose both after 6 weeks and after 12 weeks. Still, a trend for a more rapid decrease of KI was noticed for both active groups as compared to placebo. In particular, the decrease in hot flush score (isolated from the KI) was found significant for both treatment groups after 6 weeks (P<0.01) with respect to placebo. Results of the patients' questionnaire were consistent with those of the KI, with the most pronounced effects being observed for the 100-microg treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Daily intake of a hop extract, standardized on 8-PN as a potent phytoestrogen, exerted favorable effects on vasomotor symptoms and other menopausal discomforts. Hop-derived prenylated flavonoids may provide an attractive addition to the alternative treatments available for relief of hot flushes and other menopausal discomforts.     

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of immunotherapy with grass-pollen extract Alutard SQ during a 3-year period with initial rush immunotherapy

Thirty patients with asthma and/or monosensitized allergic rhinitis caused by grass pollen whose ages ranged from 15 to 35 years were selected. Two groups were established at random: an active group and a placebo group, and a double-blind study was done on treatment with immunotherapy for a period of 3 continuous years, with initiation doses administered according to the rush immunotherapy technique. Grass-pollen allergen extract Alutard SQ and histamine as a placebo were used. The objective parameters of efficacy evaluated were end-point cutaneous tests, conjunctival provocation, bronchial provocation, and symptom/medication scores, as well as specific immunoglobulin determinations. The statistical evaluation of the results was significant for the differences existing between the initial and final time of the active group, and there were significant differences between the two groups for all of the parameters considered. We found no relationship between clinical improvement and the range of specific immunoglobulin E values. Regarding the safety of the treatment, systemic adverse effects were manifested only in the initial phase (rush immunotherapy), and were easily controlled by treatment. We conclude that the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy with grass pollen make it possible to consider this treatment fundamental in these patients.     

A double-blind placebo-controlled evaluation of sublingual immunotherapy with a standardized ragweed extract in patients with seasonal rhinitis. Evidence for a dose-response relationship

BACKGROUND: There is a growing consensus on the benefits of sublingual-swallow immunotherapy in the treatment of allergic diseases. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy with standardized ragweed pollen extract tablets, in patients with an allergic rhinitis. A total of 110 outpatients were randomized (immunotherapy [I]: 55; placebo [P]: 55), of whom 99 were analyzable for efficacy (I: 48; P: 51) and 106 analyzable for safety (I: 53; P: 53). After a 28-day progression phase, the patients received a maintenance treatment during 6.5 months. Efficacy variables included a global assessment of efficacy (patient/ investigator), symptoms and medication scores as well as the frequency of asthma attacks. RESULTS: In the active treatment group, 43 patients completed the study, versus 49 on placebo. During the whole period of pollination, the difference favoring immunotherapy was highly significant for the global assessment by the patient (p = 0.004) and by the investigator (p = 0.005). Adverse reactions were reported more often in the active treatment but mild or moderate, and they abated after dose adjustment. A subgroup analysis of those patients receiving the highest dose of immunotherapy (3 tablets 3 times a week) showed a highly significant response for rhinitis and conjunctivitis total scores by comparison to lower dosages. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy and strongly suggests a dose-response relationship.