Mechanisms of acute lumen gain and recurrent restenosis after rotational atherectomy of diffuse in-stent restenosis: a quantitative angiographic and intravascular ultrasound study.

OBJECTIVES: This quantitative angiographic and intravascular ultrasound study determined the mechanisms of acute lumen enlargement and recurrent restenosis after rotational atherectomy (RA) with adjunct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis (ISR). BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis remains a significant clinical problem for which optimal treatment is under debate. Rotational atherectomy has become an alternative therapeutic approach for the treatment of diffuse ISR based on the concept of "tissue-debulking." METHODS: Rotational atherectomy with adjunct angioplasty of ISR was used in 45 patients with diffuse lesions. Quantitative coronary angiographic (QCA) analysis and sequential intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measurements were performed in all patients. Forty patients (89%) underwent angiographic six-month follow-up. RESULTS: Rotational atherectomy lead to a decrease in maximal area of stenosis from 80+/-32% before intervention to 54+/-21% after RA (p < 0.0001) as a result of a significant decrease in intimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area (CSA). The minimal lumen diameter after RA remained 15+/-4% smaller than the burr diameter used, indicating acute neointimal recoil. Additional angioplasty led to a further decrease in area of stenosis to 38+/-12% due to a significant increase in stent CSA. At six-month angiographic follow-up, recurrent restenosis rate was 45%. Lesion and stent length, preinterventional diameter stenosis and amount of acute neointimal recoil were associated with a higher rate of recurrent restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Rotational atherectomy of ISR leads to acute lumen gain by effective plaque removal. Adjunct angioplasty results in additional lumen gain by further stent expansion and tissue extrusion. Stent and lesion length, severity of ISR and acute neointimal recoil are predictors of recurrent restenosis.     

Rotational atherectomy for in-stent restenosis: acute and long-term results of the first 100 cases

Objectives. This study evaluated the clinical safety and long-term results of rotational atherectomy (RA) followed by low-pressure balloon dilatation (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [PTCA]) for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR).Background. In-stent restenosis is associated with a high incidence of recurrence after interventional treatment. Because ISR is due to neointimal hyperplasia, rotational ablation may be a more effective treatment than PTCA.Methods. Between November 1995 and November 1996, 100 consecutive patients with first-time ISR were treated by RA. Quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) were used to analyze the acute procedural results. The incidence of repeat in-stent restenosis and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at follow-up was determined.Results. Procedural success without any major in-hospital complications was achieved in 100% of cases. Slow flow was observed in 3% and creatine kinase-MB enzyme elevation >3× normal occurred in 2%. The mean burr-to-artery ratio was 0.68 ± 0.18 and adjuvant balloon dilatation was performed at 4.2 ± 2.1 atm. Minimum luminal diameter increased from 0.86 ± 0.28 mm to 1.89 ± 0.21 mm after RA and to 2.56 ± 0.29 mm after adjunct PTCA. Quantitative IVUS analysis showed that 77% of the luminal gain occurred due to rotational ablation of the restenotic tissue and only 23% occurred after adjunct balloon dilation, and further stent expansion did not contribute to the luminal enlargement. At a mean follow-up of 13 ± 5 months, repeat in-stent restenosis occurred in 28% of patients with TVR of 26%. Univariate predictors of repeat restenosis were burr-to-artery ratio <0.6, ISR in <90 days of stenting, ostial lesion, stent for a restenotic lesion and diffuse type ISR.Conclusions. Rotational atherectomy is a safe and feasible technique for treatment of ISR and is associated with a relatively low recurrent restenosis in comparison to historical controls of balloon angioplasty.     

Diagnosis and management of hepatic artery in-stent restenosis after liver transplantation by optical coherence tomography:A case report

BACKGROUND Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting represent an effective treatment for hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplantation. In the first year after stenting, approximately 22% of patients experience in-stent restenosis, increasing the risk of artery thrombosis and related complications, and 50% experience liver failure. Although angiography is an important tool for diagnosis and the planning of therapeutic interventions, it may raise doubts, especially in small-diameter arteries, and it provides low resolution rates compared with newer intravascular imaging methods, such as optical coherence tomography(OCT).CASE SUMMARY A 64-year-old male developed hepatic artery stenosis one year after orthotropic liver transplantation and was successfully treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with stenting. Five months later, the Doppler ultrasound results indicated restenosis. Visceral arteriography confirmed hepatic artery tortuosity but was doubtful for significant in-stent restenosis(ISR) and intrahepatic flow reduction. To confirm ISR, identify the etiology and guide treatment, OCT was performed. OCT showed severe stenosis due to four mechanisms: Focal and partial stent fracture, late stent malapposition, in-stent neointimal hyperplasia, and neoatherosclerosis.CONCLUSION Intravascular diagnostic methods can be useful in evaluating cases in which initial angiography results are not sufficient to provide a proper diagnosis of significant stenosis, especially with regard to ISR. A wide range of diagnoses are provided by OCT, resulting in different treatment options. Interventional radiologists should consider intravascular diagnostic methods as additional tools for evaluating patients when visceral angiography results are unclear.     

Increased incidence of coronary in-stent restenosis in type 2 diabetic patients is related to elevated serum malondialdehyde-modified low-density lipoprotein.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been reported as a major risk factor for in-stent restenosis (ISR) after intracoronary stenting, although the details of the mechanisms remain undefined. The aim of present study was to investigate the diabetes-related risk factor for ISR. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 131 patients who were implanted with bare metal stent(s) were enrolled in this study. Based on follow-up coronary angiography at 6 months after stenting, the patients were classified according to the presence or absence of ISR. Various coronary risk factors, including serum malondialdehyde-modified low-density lipoprotein (MDA-LDL) levels, were investigated at follow-up angiogram to relate to ISR in patients with or without T2DM. The increased incidence of ISR was observed in diabetic patients, which was significantly related to the increased serum MDA-LDL concentrations. The serum MDA-LDL concentration was positively correlated to glycohemoglobin levels in diabetic patients. In addition, MDA-LDL concentration was not altered after the treatment of ISR. CONCLUSIONS: The elevated serum MDA-LDL level is considered to be a potent risk factor for ISR in diabetic patients. MDA-LDL, which might be a consequence of metabolic abnormalities caused by diabetes, may act as a growth factor for neointimal tissues inside the implanted stent.     

Preinterventional peak monocyte count and in-stent intimal hyperplasia after coronary stent implantation in human coronary arteries

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of restenosis after stent implantation principally is neointimal hyperplasia. There is evidence that monocytes play a important role in in-stent restenosis (ISR) after stent implantation. Hypothesis: This study assessed the relationship between preinterventional peak monocyte count and neointimal growth after successful stent implantation. METHODS: We performed coronary stent implantation in 85 patients (85 de novo lesions). Peripheral blood sample was obtained in all patients every 12 h before coronary angiography for measurement of peripheral monocytes. All patients received angiographic and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) follow-up at 6 months after stenting. RESULTS: The preinterventional circulating monocyte count was significantly higher in the ISR group than that in the group without ISR (654 +/- 62/vs. 461 +/- 222/mm3, p < 0.001) and was significantly higher in the reintervention group than that in the no-reintervention group (660 +/- 72/ vs. 470 +/- 216/mm3, p< 0.001). The incidence of ISR and repeat intervention associated with preinterventional monocyte count was highest among the patients in the highest tertile, who were at a 2.64-fold increased risk of ISR and 3.22-fold increased risk of repeat intervention compared with the patients in the lowest tertile. A significant positive correlation was found between preinterventional peak monocyte count and preinterventional plaque and media cross-sectional area and follow-up neointima area (r = 0.311, p = 0.007, r = 0.465, p < 0.001, respectively). The neointima area associated with preinterventional monocyte count was largest among the patients in the highest tertile, that is, 2-fold larger than that of the patients in the lowest tertile (p < 0.001) and 1.44-fold larger than that of the patients in the middle tertile (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that circulating preinterventional monocytes play a principal role in the process of in-stent neointimal growth after successful stent implantation.     

Predictors of recurrent restenosis after coronary stenting: an analysis of 197 patients

One of the major limitations in coronary stenting is in-stent restenosis. This study was aimed to identify clinical, angiographic, and procedural factors that may be related to recurrent in-stent restenosis. We analyzed consecutive 197 patients who underwent coronary stenting. Follow-up angiography was available in 170 patients and repeat balloon angioplasty was performed for in-stent restenosis. These patients were subdivided into 3 groups: group A consisted of 100 patients that were never restenosed, group B had 49 patients restenosed once, and in group C were 21 patients restenosed more than twice. Group C was more often female (48%) and included diabetes mellitus patients (52%). Lesion location, reference vessel size and diameter stenosis were similar for all groups. However, the incidence of calcified lesions tended to be higher (50% vs. 29%; p = 0.07), and lesion length was longer in group C than in group A (11.9+/- 5.4 mm vs. 9.0+/- 3.9 mm; p < 0.01). Diameter stenosis after predilation as well as after stenting was significantly higher in group C than in group A (50+/- 10% vs 39+/- 10%; p < 0.01, 32+/- 8% vs. 19+/- 10%; p < 0.01). The incidence of diffuse type of in-stent restenosis was significantly higher in group C than in group B (62% vs. 14%; p < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified diameter stenosis after stenting (p = 0.0022), female (p = 0.0135), and diameter stenosis after predilatation (p = 0.0233) as the significant correlate of recurrent in-stent restenosis. In conclusion, the major recurrent in-stent restenosis predictors identified included female gender, final diameter stenosis, and diameter stenosis after predilatation.     

雷帕霉素洗脱支架治疗支架内再狭窄的临床及冠状动脉造影随访观察

目的评价雷帕霉素洗脱支架(商品名Cypher支架,强生公司产品)治疗支架内再狭窄的疗效及安全性。方法27例支架内再狭窄且有临床缺血症状的患者接受了Cypher支架治疗,其中23例患者的支架内再狭窄为弥漫、复杂病变,有5例同时置入了2个Cypher支架。术后对所有患者进行临床随访及冠状动脉造影复查。结果所有支架均成功置入,无残余狭窄或残余狭窄<10%,未见任何并发症。平均随访时间8.9±2.1(5～14)年,临床随访率96.3%,造影随访率92.6%。随访期间,无一例患者死亡。有1例支架近端边缘节段血管发生了再狭窄导致临床心绞痛复发,2例支架近端边缘节段有轻微的新生内膜增殖,但狭窄程度<25%,其余24例均无明显的晚期管腔丢失。本组支架内平均晚期管腔丢失(0.09±0.02)mm、支架远端边缘节段(0.10±0.03)mm、支架近端边缘节段(0.20±0.06)mm。靶血管血运重建率3.8%。结论Cypher支架治疗支架内再狭窄安全、可行,它能有效防止这类病变的新生内膜增殖和再次再狭窄。     

Focal in-stent restenosis and in-stent thrombosis within the same bare-metal stent 5 years after deployment in a saphenous vein graft

Complications of percutaneous coronary intervention include in-stent restenosis (ISR) and in-stent thrombosis (IST) which have different underlying pathophysiological processes and different treatment strategies. ISR is primarily due to excessive neointimal growth and occurs in 20-30% of bare-metal stents (BMS). Drug-eluting stents (DES) have decreased the rates of ISR (< 10%), but are potentially associated with increased IST related to delayed arterial healing and stent strut exposure. ISR of BMS typically occurs within 6 months of stent deployment. IST usually occurs within 12 months of DES deployment. We present a case of focal ISR and IST within the same BMS, confirmed with intravascular ultrasound, 5 years after deployment in a saphenous vein graft.     

支架内再狭窄的介入治疗

目的介绍支架内再狭窄的处理经验.方法回顾分析156例支架内再狭窄患者经PTCA或支架植入术治疗的即刻和术后随访结果.支架内再狭窄治疗前后行冠脉造影,并于术后5.7±3.8个月复查冠脉造影.结果 156例支架内再狭窄患者PTCA或支架术治疗均获成功,其中134例(144支血管)行PTCA治疗,占86.7%;22例(22支血管)行再次支架置入术,占13.3%.156例经再次PTCA或支架术治疗后随访平均6个月的再狭窄率为24.3%.40处弥漫性支架内再狭窄经PTCA处理后18处(45%)再次再狭窄,而96处局限性支架内再狭窄中有17处再次再狭窄(18%),弥漫性支架内再狭窄经PTCA治疗后,再次再狭窄率明显高于局限性支架内再狭窄(P<0.01).支架内狭窄严重程度(>75%)也是影响PTCA疗效的主要因素.结论对于大多数支架内再狭窄(70%)采用PTCA治疗安全有效,术后再狭窄率与首次支架置入术相似.     

Interferon-gamma and interferon-gamma receptor 1 and 2 gene polymorphisms and restenosis following coronary stenting

In a recent study, analysis of gene expression in atherectomy specimens derived from restenotic coronary lesions revealed 223 differentially expressed genes. Thirty-seven of these genes indicated activation of interferon- (IFN-) gamma signaling in neointimal smooth muscle cells. Moreover, genetic disruption of IFN-gamma signaling in a mouse model of restenosis significantly reduced the vascular proliferative response. Thus, IFN-gamma is assumed to play an important role in the control of tissue proliferation during neointima formation. We hypothesized that genetic variants of IFN-gamma and its receptor subunits are involved in upregulation of IFN-gamma related genes in neointimal tissue of patients that develop in-stent restenosis. Polymorphisms in the genes encoding for IFN-gamma (IFNG T874A) and its receptors 1 (IFNGR1 C-56T) and 2 (IFNGR2 A839G) were tested for their association with restenosis. IFNG T874A, IFNGR1 C-56T and IFNGR2 A839G genotypes were determined in a consecutive series of patients (n=2591) that had been treated with coronary stents. Follow-up angiography 6 months after stent implantation was performed in 76.8% of the patients. Genotyping was performed with PCR-based methods. IFNG T874A, IFNGR1 C-56T and IFNGR2 A839G genotypes were not associated with the incidence of angiographic and clinical restenosis (P>0.23). Moreover, there was no association between IFNG, IFNGR1 and IFNGR2 genotypes and the combined incidence of death form any cause and non-fatal myocardial infarction during the first 12 months following the intervention (P>0.61). Thus, this study does not support a clinically relevant role of the studied polymorphisms in the processes leading to in-stent restenosis.     

Intravascular ultrasound evaluation after sirolimus eluting stent implantation for de novo and in-stent restenosis lesions.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) on neointimal growth and vessel remodelling for in-stent restenosis versus de novo coronary artery lesions using serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 86 patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) (n=41) or de novo lesions (n=45) treated with SES and evaluated by IVUS post-procedure and at follow-up. One 18-mm SES was used for de novo lesions while 16 patients with ISR received >1SES (total stented length 17.9 mm vs 22.0 mm respectively; P=0.004). At follow-up, no differences were observed between the ISR and de novo groups with respect to changes in the mean external elastic membrane (1.7% vs 1.3%; P=0.53), plaque behind the stent (1.2% vs 3.4%; P=0.49), and lumen areas (0.7% vs 1.9%; P=0.58). No positive remodelling or edge effect was observed. A gap between stents was observed in two patients with ISR, where more prominent, though non-obstructive, neointimal proliferation was noted. CONCLUSION: Sirolimus-eluting stenting is equally effective at inhibiting neointimal proliferation in de novo and ISR lesions without inducing edge restenosis or positive vascular remodelling.     

Peripheral CD34+ cells and the risk of in-stent restenosis in patients with coronary heart disease

In-stent restenosis represents the major limitation of percutaneous coronary revascularization. The underlying neointimal hyperplasia mainly consists of smooth muscle cells (SMCs), which can be derived from bone marrow cells. We hypothesized that changes in the peripheral progenitor cell counts after coronary stenting may predict the development of restenosis. We prospectively studied men with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease who had undergone successful elective stenting of solitary target lesions (n = 17). Peripheral blood samples were drawn at baseline (before stenting) and 1 day after stenting. The CD34+ cell count was determined by flow cytometry. Follow-up quantitative coronary angiography was performed after 8.1 +/- 2.6 months. Except for longer primary lesions in patients with angiographic restenosis, no significant differences in patient and lesion characteristics were seen. The rate of restenosis (75% vs 11%, p = 0.015) and the extent of diameter stenosis at follow-up (56.9 +/- 26.9% vs 26.5 +/- 16.5%, p = 0.012) were higher in patients with a postprocedural increase in CD34+ cells than in those with a decrease in CD34+ cells. Postprocedural CD34+ cell counts were increased in patients with restenosis but decreased in those without restenosis (p = 0.002). A robust correlation was seen between the change in CD34+ cells and late lumen loss (r = 0.65, p <0.005). In a multivariate regression model, the change in CD34+ cells, lesion length, and preprocedural minimal lumen diameter independently predicted for late lumen loss. In conclusion, an increase in circulating CD34+ cells after coronary stenting constitutes an independent risk factor predicting in-stent restenosis and may be suggestive of their involvement in neointimal hyperplasia.     

Six-month clinical and angiographic outcome after successful excimer laser angioplasty for in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the clinical and angiographic six-month follow-up after excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) for restenosed coronary stents. BACKGROUND: Excimer laser coronary angioplasty has recently been shown to be safe and efficient for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. METHODS: Ninety-six consecutive patients successfully treated with ELCA within 141 stents were included in a six-month clinical and angiographic follow-up. RESULTS: During follow-up there was one sudden death and one patient with documented myocardial infarction. Angina pectoris classified as > or = Canadian Cardiovascular Society II reoccurred in 49 patients. Follow-up angiography was obtained in 89 patients (93%) with 133 stents. Quantitative coronary angiography revealed a mean diameter stenosis of 77 +/- 10% before intervention, 41 +/- 12% after laser treatment and 11% +/- 12% after adjunctive percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (p < 0.001). Six months after ELCA the mean diameter stenosis had increased to 60 +/- 26% (p < 0.001). A > or =50% diameter stenosis was present in 48 patients (54%); in 24 of these patients diameter stenosis was > or =70%. Total occlusions occurred in an additional 10 patients (11%). There was a trend toward an increased recurrent restenosis rate in patients with diabetes mellitus and long lesions or total occlusions (p = 0.059). Forty-eight patients (50%) received medical treatment after six months. Reinterventions were necessary in 30 patients (31%), and coronary artery bypass surgery was performed in 17 patients (18%). Event-free survival was 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Excimer laser angioplasty for in-stent restenosis was associated with a high incidence of recurrent restenosis in this group of patients, suggesting that this technique is unlikely to reduce recurrent in-stent restenosis and that other approaches are necessary.     

Use of everolimus-eluting stent with a bioresorbable polymer coating for treatment of recurrent in-stent restenosis

Recently, an everolimus-eluting stent utilizing a bioresorbabale PLA polymer coating to release the agent everolimus has proven safe and effective in preventing restenosis for up to six months in de novo coronary arteries. But the use of a bioresorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent for in-stent restenosis lesions has not been previously investigated. This is a case report of one-year angiographic follow-up results after the implantation of a bioresorbable PLA polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent for the treatment of recurrent in-stent restenosis. The case involved a 63-year-old female who had repeatedly presented with recurrent in-stent restenosis in the LCX. We successfully treated this recurrent ISR lesion by using a bioresorbable PLA polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent; the one-year follow-up angiography revealed prevention of ISR after the implantation of this device.     

基质金属蛋白酶-9和内皮素-1评价冠状动脉内支架术后再狭窄的意义

目的探讨动态检测基质金属蛋白酶（MMP）-9、内皮素（ET）-1在经皮冠脉介人术（PCI）后再狭窄的意义。方法对30例经皮冠脉介人术后患者进行造影及光学相干断层成像（OCT）检查随访,造影证实再狭窄5例,共7处病变;无再狭窄25例,共34处病变。测量并比较两组内膜组织覆盖厚度、最狭窄处血管管腔面积、最狭窄处支架面积等,计算支架的最大内膜组织覆盖面积及支架的内膜组织覆盖面积百分比。术前及随访时均行MMP-9及ET-1检测,比较两组PCI前后MMP-9和ET-1的变化。结果与无再狭窄组比较,再狭窄组有更大的内膜组织覆盖厚度、内膜组织覆盖面积及更少的最小管腔面积。术前再狭窄组和非再狭窄组的MMP一9和ET—l浓度均无明显差异;术后再狭窄组的MMP一9、ET一1浓度明显高于非再狭窄组（P〈O．05）;术后再狭窄组MMP-9、ET-1浓度较术前明显升高（P〈0．05）;非再狭窄组术后MMP-9、ET-1浓度较术前均无明显变化。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,冠状动脉支架术后支架内再狭窄可能与MMP-9水平（P〈0．01,OR=1．84,95％CI：1．38-2．43）和ET-1水平（P〈0．0l,OR=1．37,95％CI：1．19~2．57）呈正相关。结论PCI后支架内再狭窄患者MMP-9和ET-1水平较术前升高。MMP-9及ET-1可作为预测冠脉再狭窄的参考指标。     

Intracoronary brachytherapy with beta-radiation for the treatment of long diffuse in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of intracoronary brachytherapy with beta-radiation (Sr/Y) for the treatment of long diffuse in-stent restenosis (ISR). METHODS: As recurrent ISR depends on intimal injury after coronary angioplasty, long in-stent restenotic lesions were defined as lesions with a treatment length >26 mm (lesion length >20 mm plus a treatment margin of 3 mm at each end). Seventy-eight patients with long ISR were treated at our institution with beta-brachytherapy after coronary angioplasty. Patients were irradiated with either an approximate dose of 12 Gy at 1 mm vessel wall depth or with 18 Gy at 1 mm vessel wall depth. Clinical follow-up was available for 69 patients and angiographic follow-up for 65 patients. Late lumen loss (LLL), binary restenosis (stenosis >50%), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were assessed for a follow-up time of 6.6+/-2.2 months. RESULTS: Mean interventional treatment length was 46+/-18 mm. TLR was performed in all 23 patients with binary restenosis (33%). Death of cardiac cause was reported for two patients, one of whom did not undergo TLR. Thus, overall MACE rate was 35%. Recurrent ISR was significantly more frequent in patients with geographic miss. Comparison of the different radiation dose regimens revealed significantly lower LLL in patients irradiated with the higher dose (0.20+/-0.68 mm compared with 0.65+/-0.96 mm, P=0.03). CONCLUSION: Intracoronary brachytherapy with beta-radiation (Sr/Y) is a safe and effective therapeutic option for the reduction of recurrent ISR in long diffuse lesions. We recommend a high-dose irradiation with 18 Gy at 1 mm vessel wall depth.     

Predictors of diffuse-type in-stent restenosis after coronary stent implantation

Diffuse-type in-stent restenosis (ISR) is associated with higher rate of restenosis after balloon angioplasty, requiring new therapeutic modalities; therefore, it is clinically important to identify the determinants of diffuse-type ISR. We evaluate the clinical and angiographic variables to predict diffuse-type ISR after coronary stent placement. Two hundred and ten ISR lesions in 196 patients (diffuse ISR, 114 lesions; focal ISR, 96 lesions) were reviewed in this study. Clinical, procedural and quantitative coronary angiographic parameters were analyzed. Diffuse-type ISR was defined as a ≥50% lumen narrowing and ≥10-mm length. Univariate analysis revealed that initial lesion length, smaller vessel size, diabetes, multivessel disease, multiple stents, and long stent were significantly associated with diffuse-type ISR. However, diabetes was the only independent predictor of diffuse-type ISR by stepwise multiple regression analysis (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.4–7.4, P = 0.001). Diabetes was associated with diffuse-type ISR after coronary stent placement. It may reflect enhanced rate of neointimal hyperplasia within the stent in diabetic patients. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 47:406–409, 1999. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

冠心病合并2型糖尿病患者冠状动脉内支架术后的远期随访

目的 探讨冠心病合并2型糖尿病(DM)患者冠状动脉异常程度和冠状动脉内支架术后远期疗效.方法 将行冠状动脉内支架术的1172例冠心病患者分为DM组(249例)和非DM组(923例).对两组的冠状动脉病变情况及远期临床疗效进行比较.结果 与非DM组比较,DM组病变数较多(P=0.046),2支(P=0.029)和3支(P=0.013)病变比例较高,弥漫病变(P=0.001)、慢性闭塞性病变(P=0.044)及重度病变(P=0.012)多见.两组临床随访率差异无统计学意义.与非DM组相比,DM组支架内再狭窄(55.96/万比35.51/万)、再次血运重建(76.18/万比51.55/万)和主要不良心血管事件(85.50/万比61.47/万)的人月发病率均明显增高(均P=0.000).COX多因素回归分析显示,2型DM与支架内再狭窄(P=0.000)、再次血管重建(P=0.001)、主要不良心血管事件(P=0.003)密切相关,但与死亡无明显相关.结论 合并2型DM的冠心病患者冠状动脉病变较重.2型DM是支架内再狭窄、再次血管重建和主要不良心血管事件的独立预测因子.     

A randomized comparison of repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVES: This randomized trial compared repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty (BA) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). BACKGROUND: Stent restenosis constitutes a therapeutic challenge. Repeat coronary interventions are currently used in this setting, but the recurrence risk remains high. METHODS: We randomly assigned 450 patients with ISR to elective stent implantation (224 patients) or conventional BA (226 patients). Primary end point was recurrent restenosis rate at six months. Secondary end points included minimal lumen diameter (MLD), prespecified subgroup analyses, and a composite of major adverse events. RESULTS: Procedural success was similar in both groups, but in-hospital complications were more frequent in the balloon group. After the procedure MLD was larger in the stent group (2.77 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.25 +/- 0.5 mm, p < 0.001). At follow-up, MLD was larger after stenting when the in-lesion site was considered (1.69 +/- 0.8 vs. 1.54 +/- 0.7 mm, p = 0.046). However, the binary restenosis rate (38% stent group, 39% balloon group) was similar with the two strategies. One-year event-free survival (follow-up 100%) was also similar in both groups (77% stent vs. 71% balloon, p = 0.19). Nevertheless, in the prespecified subgroup of patients with large vessels (> or =3 mm) the restenosis rate (27% vs. 49%, p = 0.007) and the event-free survival (84% vs. 62%, p = 0.002) were better after repeat stenting. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ISR, repeat coronary stenting provided better initial angiographic results but failed to improve restenosis rate and clinical outcome when compared with BA. However, in patients with large vessels coronary stenting improved the long-term clinical and angiographic outcome.     

Intracoronary β-irradiation prevents excessive in-stent neointimal proliferation in de novo lesions of patients with high plasma ACE levels. The BetAce randomized trial

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated vascular brachytherapy (VBT) as a potent antiproliferative treatment to prevent in-stent restenosis (ISR) after coronary angioplasty of de novo lesions in patients carrying the D allele of the I/D polymorphism of the ACE gene and high ACE plasma levels (>34 U/l). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A prospective randomized trial was designed to detect a 30% improvement in the minimal lumen diameter (MLD) of the stenotic artery, as measured by quantitative coronary analysis (QCA), 6 months following VBT at the time of stented angioplasty. All patients were carriers of the D allele of the ACE gene, with plasma ACE levels >34 U/l. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (33 stenoses) were allocated to stent implantation (control group) and 30 patients (31 stenoses) to VBT and stented angioplasty. After angioplasty, in-stent MLD was similar in the two groups. At 6 months in the control group, in-stent MLD had decreased to 1.74+/-0.8 versus 2.25+/-1.05 mm in the VBT group (P=.04). The mean in-stent diameter was 2.3+/-0.8 mm in the control group versus 2.9+/-1.05 mm after VBT (P=.02), and the restenosis rate was 37.5% versus 17.9%, respectively (P=.08). At 6 months, a higher need for target vessel revascularization (TVR) was observed in the control group: 35.5% versus 13.3% (P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: This randomized study confirms that patients with high plasma ACE concentrations are exposed to an increased risk for ISR after coronary stenting. The preventive use of VBT in these patients reduced neointimal formation by 65% such that the MLD at follow-up was increased by 29% compared with the control group.