首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of adding an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in heart failure (HF) patients already taking an angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor (ACE-I) plus an aldosterone antagonist is uncertain (especially if taking a beta blocker as well). The CHARM-Added trial describes the largest experience of using multiple inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) together. METHODS AND RESULTS: 2548 HF patients, taking an ACE-I (936 no spironolactone/no beta blocker; 1175 no spironolactone/beta blocker; 199 spironolactone/no beta blocker; 238 sprionolactone/beta blocker), were randomized to placebo or candesartan and followed for 41 months (median). The primary outcome was cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. In patients taking both a beta blocker and spironolactone (in addition to an ACE-I) at baseline, the candesartan:placebo hazard ratio was 0.85(95% CI 0.56, 1.29), compared to 0.85(95% CI 0.75, 0.96) in all randomized patients (interaction p value 0.49). The relative risk of discontinuation of candesartan (compared to placebo) because of hypotension, increased serum creatinine or hyperkalemia was not increased in patients taking spironolactone at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: An ARB may provide added benefit, at acceptable risk, in HF patients already taking spironolactone as well as an ACE-I and beta blocker. These findings must be confirmed in a prospective randomized trial before this approach can be recommended, routinely.  相似文献   

9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
The role for beta blockers in advanced heart failure (New York Heart Association class IV) remains undefined because of concerns about tolerability and uncertainty about efficacy. We report the use of a short-acting intravenous beta blocker in combination with inotropic therapy as a means to bridge five patients with advanced heart failure to chronic oral beta blockade; two of these patients had been chronically managed with intravenous inotrope. At 4 months' follow-up, all patients remained on beta-blocker therapy and none was hospitalized for heart failure or had received intravenous diuretics. Given the early separation of survival curves in the randomized clinical trials of beta blockers in heart failure, it is possible that these patients will accrue a survival benefit. We conclude that some patients with advanced heart failure can be offered oral beta-blocker therapy by bridging with a combination of intravenous inotrope and short-acting intravenous beta blocker.  相似文献   

14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
The effect of ibopamine and furosemide in 130 patients with NYHA Class I and II heart failure were studied in a parallel, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled multi-centre trial. Ibopamine 200 mg b.i.d. was compared to furosemide 40 mg q.d. and placebo. A 1- to 2-week single-blind run-in period was followed by an 8-week double-blind treatment period. Reproducible treadmill exercise test times with the modified Naughton-Balke protocol were required for randomization. Exercise times increased significantly in comparison to the placebo group after 8 weeks of therapy for both the furosemide group (1.2 min, P < 0.035) and the ibopamine group (1.3 min, P < 0.025). Neither furosemide nor ibopamine affected quality of life assessments. Adverse clinical experiences were generally mild and similar in frequency amongst the three treatment groups. The results of this study show the usefulness of both ibopamine and furosemide as monotherapy in patients with mild congestive heart failure.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号