Diagnosis of heart failure in primary care

Heart failure is becoming an increasing concern to healthcare worldwide. It is the only cardiovascular disorder that continues to increase in both prevalence and incidence, and as the population continues to age, it is expected that the prevalence of this disease will continue to rise. Guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of heart failure are to be met. Most patients with heart failure will present themselves in general practice. Therefore, the community management of heart failure has become increasingly important and the role of General Practitioners even more crucial. Improving the reliability of diagnosis in primary care is essential since determining the aetiology and stage of heart failure leads to different management choices to improve symptoms, quality of life and disease prognosis. Furthermore, early diagnosis is needed, when there may be no symptoms, since treatment can delay or reverse disease progression. Diagnostic methods may therefore need to encompass screening strategies, as well as symptomatic case identification, in the future. General Practitioners must make correct decisions regarding appropriate further investigation, treatment and referral. A correct diagnosis is the cornerstone leading to effective management. The aim of this paper is to review the role of symptoms and signs and diagnostic tests, such as, chest X-ray, ECG, natriuretic peptides and echocardiography, for diagnosing heart failure in the primary care setting. Improving diagnostic skills remains a continuous challenge for clinicians. Simple and reliable diagnostic procedures are crucial to comply with Guidelines and reduce healthcare utilisation and costs.     

Diagnosis of heart failure in elderly patients in primary care

BACKGROUND: Heart failure is difficult to diagnose in a primary care setting with a reported false positive diagnosis in up to 70% of cases. Aims: To use echocardiography in a large rural practice to evaluate the accuracy of diagnosis of heart failure in patients over 65 years of age. METHODS: Sixty patients with a previous diagnosis of heart failure were selected at random from the practice records and were invited to attend for an echocardiogram at the practice premises. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients attended, the age was 81+/-7 years, 29% had impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function of whom 65% were in atrial fibrillation. A further 7% had isolated diastolic LV dysfunction. The prevalence of heart failure by clinical assessment was 29 per 1000 in this patient group and 9 per 1000 when echocardiography was used to confirm the diagnosis. CONCLUSION: True heart failure in this population is less prevalent than has been estimated from practice records.     

The diagnosis of heart failure in European primary care: The IMPROVEMENT Programme survey of perception and practice

OBJECTIVE: To examine European primary care physicians (PCPs) views on diagnosis of heart failure and compare perceptions with actual practice. DESIGN: Semi-structured PCP interviews and case note review on a random sample of heart failure patients. PARTICIPANTS: 1363 primary care physicians from 14 countries and 11,062 patient notes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perceptions of PCPs compared to actual performance in heart failure (HF) diagnosis. RESULTS: Over 50% of patients with HF were above 70 years of age. Most subjects presented with typical clinical symptoms and objective signs of HF. In 50% of cases, HF was mainly diagnosed by PCPs. New York Heart Association classification was used by 50% of physicians. Electrocardiogram and chest X-ray were the most used diagnostic tests (90% and 84% respectively). PCPs considered echocardiography as having low diagnostic value, with only 48% routine usage. However, in actual practice echocardiography was used in 82% of diagnoses. Systolic dysfunction was observed in 51% HF subjects, but only 50% of physicians would differentiate systolic from diastolic heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: There was low use of NYHA classification (which denotes symptom severity) and differentiation between systolic and diastolic causes (which determines treatment strategies).     

Using BNP to develop a risk score for heart failure in primary care.

AIMS: Chronic heart failure is a common condition with high mortality. Accurate diagnosis in primary care is difficult. Elevated B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is associated with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and increased mortality. Prognostic scoring systems using BNP may help to stratify risk in primary care patients. The aim of this research was to establish the independent variables which predict mortality in a primary care population-prescribed loop diuretics and to generate and validate a scoring system for heart failure in general practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty-two patients were followed up for a mean of 6.4 years after attending a research clinic for clinical assessment, electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography, and BNP. Multivariate analysis was used to establish independent prognostic variables and to generate a prognostic scoring system. The score generated was [0.50 x BNP+5 x age+50 x (CVA+sex+diabetes+ECG)]. The cut-off scores for risk groups were; 25th percentile, 411; 50th percentile, 475; 75th percentile, 524; Harrell's c=0.75. CONCLUSION: Developing prognostic scoring systems provides a means of risk stratifying patients without relying on a single cut-off diagnostic value for BNP. Further validation of such scoring systems may improve future management of community heart failure patients.     

Compliance in heart failure patients: the importance of knowledge and beliefs.

AIMS: Non-compliance in patients with heart failure (HF) contributes to worsening HF symptoms and may lead to hospitalization. Several smaller studies have examined compliance in HF, but all were limited as they only studied either the individual components of compliance and its related factors or several aspects of compliance without studying the related factors. The aims of this study were to examine all dimensions of compliance and its related factors in one HF population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were collected in a cohort of 501 HF patients. Clinical and demographic data were assessed and patients completed questionnaires on compliance, beliefs, knowledge, and self-care behaviour. Overall compliance was 72% in this older HF population. Compliance with medication and appointment keeping was high (>90%). In contrast, compliance with diet (83%), fluid restriction (73%), exercise (39%), and weighing (35%) was markedly lower. Compliance was related to knowledge (OR=5.67; CI 2.87-11.19), beliefs (OR=1.78; CI 1.18-2.69), and depressive symptoms (OR=0.53; CI 0.35-0.78). CONCLUSION: Although some aspects of compliance had an acceptable level, compliance with weighing and exercise were low. In order to improve compliance, an increase of knowledge and a change of patient's beliefs by education and counselling are recommended. Extra attention should be paid to patients with depressive symptoms.