Aortic intramural hematoma with severe aortic regurgitation

A 71-year-old Japanese woman with severe chest pain was diagnosed with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection. After 3 months of medical treatment, she was operated on under a diagnosis of dissecting aneurysm of the ascending aorta and severe aortic regurgitation. Operative findings showed prolapse, of the redundant aortic leaflets and a dilated ascending aorta without intimal tears. Operative and computed tomography findings differed from those of a classical dissection which was the primary diagnosis of this patient, and were compatible with a diagnosis of aortic intramural hematoma (IMH). Few reports of IMH include concomitant aortic regurgitation. Surgery involved aortic root remodeling and prosthetic graft replacement of the ascending aorta.     

主动脉壁间血肿、穿透性粥样硬化性主动脉溃疡和主动脉夹层:影像学表现和发病机制进展

主动脉壁间血肿（AIH）、穿透性粥样硬化性主动脉溃疡（PAU）和主动脉夹层（AD）有相似的易患因素和临床表现,临床有时不易鉴别,但三者影像学表现和发病机制不同。本文对AIH、PAU和AD的影像学表现和发病机制进展进行综述。     

Aortic valve replacement for severe aortic regurgitation caused by idiopathic giant cell aortitis.

Giant cell aoritis occurred in a 25-year-old woman, with absent pulses in the left arm and severe aortic regurgitation from dilatation of the valvar annulus. The aortic valve was replaced by a Starr-Edwards prosthesis, and the patient was treated with steroids. Five years later, she continues asymptomatic and haemodynamically stable. The left brachial and radial pulses have returned.     

Aortic valve repair in dominant aortic regurgitation.

OBJECTIVE: We studied immediate and mid-term results after aortic valve repair. METHODS: Immediate and mid-term results were studied in 63 patients undergoing aortic valve repair, calculating survival and reoperation free rates. RESULTS: Subjects were 49 men and 14 women aged 15 to 76 years (mean: 53 +/- 17 years). Mean preoperative aortic regurgitation grading of 1 to 4 was 3.2 +/- 0.7. Mean preoperative New York Heart Association functional class was 1.9 +/- 0.8. Two in-hospital deaths occurred. (3.2%) Mean aortic regurgitation grade at discharge was 1.3 +/- 0.8 (p < 0.0001; vs preoperative grade) and functional class was 1.1 +/- 0.2 (p < 0.0001; vs preoperative class),--significantly improved. Overall follow-up was 98.4%, and mean follow-up continued 41.4 +/- 22.1 months. Mean functional class at follow-up was 1.2 +/- 0.4 (n = 49), improved from preoperative class (p < 0.0001). Mean aortic regurgitation grading at follow-up was 1.8 +/- 0.8 (n = 41), improved from preoperative grading (p < 0.0001). Five-year survival was 95.1 +/- 2.8%. One-year reoperation freedom was 96.6 +/- 2.4% and 5-year 77.9 +/- 6.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Survival after surgery was good, while reoperation was comparable to other reports but less satisfactory compared to reoperation freedom after aortic valve replacement. Based on reoperative findings, a change in indication was made. We believe technical refinements could improve postoperative results.     

Aortic valve replacement for aortic regurgitation and stenosis, in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic valve replacement for aortic valve stenosis (AS) and regurgitation (AR) in patients with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction contains an increased risk. Few data are available on the outcome of such patients. METHODS: Fifty-five consecutive patients with severe LV dysfunction (ejection fraction, EF; <30%) and aortic valve replacement for AS (n=35) or AR (n=20) were investigated between 1994 and 2001. EF was 25+/-5%, mean transvalvular gradient 26+/-6mmHg (AS), aortic valve area 0.66+/-0.18cm(2) (AS), cardiac index (CI) 2.4+/-0.9l/min/m(2), enddiastolic LV diameter (LVEDD) 64+/-8mm and endsystolic LV diameters (LVESD) was 55+/-3mm. Ninety percent of patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III/IV at admission to the hospital. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) were performed in 14 patients. Follow-up examinations including chest X-ray, echocardiography, exercise testing, were performed among survivors. RESULTS: The survival rates for AS were: 1-year 76%, 2-year 68.8%, 5-year 64.2%; for AR: 1-year 94.4%, 2-year 86.5%, 5-year 74.2%. NYHA functional class improved from 90% in class III/IV to 45 (AR group) and 24% (AS group) at follow-up (P<0.02). The LVEDD decreased to 54+/-8mm after 1 year. The EF improved to 38+/-4 (AR group) and 40+/-5% (AS group) at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Despite severe LV dysfunction, increased 1-year mortality especially in the AS group, aortic valve replacement was associated with improved functional status, symptoms and EF in both groups and in most patients. We, therefore, conclude that aortic valve replacement in patients with severe LV dysfunction can be performed with acceptable risk.     

Diagnosis and treatment of thoracic aortic intramural hematoma

Purpose: This report reviews our recent experience with nine patients who had intramural hematoma of the thoracic aorta.Methods: This was a retrospective study of all patients who had intramural hematoma at our institution from 1989 to 1994. Patients who had identifiable intimal flap, tear, or penetrating aortic ulcer were excluded from the study.Results: Among these nine elderly patients (mean age, 76 years), the most common presentation was chest or back pain. Intramural hematoma was diagnosed by a variety of high-resolution imaging techniques. The descending thoracic aorta alone was involved in seven patients, whereas the ascending aorta was affected in the other two patients. One patient had evidence of an aneurysm (5.0 cm diameter) in the region of the hematoma. All patients were initially managed nonsurgically with blood pressure control. Both patients who had ascending aortic involvement had progression of aortic hematoma, which resulted in death in one case and in successful surgery in the other. Six of the seven patients who had descending aortic involvement alone were successfully managed without aortic surgery. The patient who had intramural hematoma and associated aortic aneurysm, however, had severe, recurrent pain and underwent successful aortic replacement. Another patient had recurrent pain associated with hypertension, but was successfully managed nonsurgically with antihypertensive therapy. All eight survivors are doing well at a median follow-up of 19 months.Conclusions: Intramural hematoma appears to be a distinct entity, although overlap with aortic dissection or penetrating aortic ulcer exists. Aggressive control of blood pressure with intensive care unit monitoring has been our initial management. Patients who have involvement of the descending thoracic aorta alone can frequently be managed without surgery in the absence of coexisting aneurysmal dilatation or disease progression. Our experience suggests that a more aggressive approach with early surgery is warranted in patients who have ascending aortic involvement or those who have coexisting aneurysm and intramural hematoma. (J Vasc Surg 1996;24;1022-9.)     

Congenital aortic valve anomaly. Aortic regurgitation with left coronary artery isolation.

A case is reported of aortic regurgitation resulting from a congenitally abnormal aortic valve. The left coronary cusp of the valve was small and adhered to the aortic wall, so that there was insufficient valve tissue to maintain diastolic valve competence. In addition, this rudimentary cusp completely occluded the left coronary ostium. The patient was treated successfully by valve replacement.     

Endovascular treatment of an acute ascending aortic intramural hematoma

INTRODUCTION

Herein, we present a case of an elderly gentleman who presented with an extensive intramural hematoma of the aorta which was treated with a percutaneous placement of an endovascular stent.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 79-year-old male with a history of hypertension presented to the emergency department because of sudden onset of substernal chest pain radiating to his back. A chest computerized tomography scan was performed that demonstrated a Type A aortic wall intramural hematoma involving the arch and ascending aorta dissecting both antegrade and retrograde from a penetrating ulcer located in the descending aorta, immediately distal to the left subclavian artery. No dissection flap was noted. The patient opted for an endovascular approach. He was treated with the placement of a stent just distal to the left subclavian artery, with good results noted on follow-up exam performed 3 months later.

DISCUSSION

The treatment of a Type A IMH lacks consensus, but the majority do favor surgical management. The data are limited; however, there are reports of patients with Type A intramural hematoma treated with descending aortic endograft at the site of the culprit ulcerated plaque, with satisfactory results.

CONCLUSION

In a select group of patients, an endovascular approach for the treatment of a Type A aortic wall intramural hematoma caused by an ulcerated plaque may be a viable treatment option.     

Acute proximal aortic intramural hematoma: a case report

The case presented here is of a 72-year-old man with an acute proximal aortic hematoma. He was hospitalized and underwent close monitoring and blood pressure control. Typical aortic dissection developed during his hospital admission. This case emphasizes the importance of frequent follow-up imaging during medical therapy of patients with aortic intramural hematoma. However, the frequency of imaging is yet to be determined.     

Aortic valve repair in dominant aortic regurgitation

Objective: We studied immediate and mid-term results after aortic valve repair.Methods: Immediate and mid-term results were studied in 63 patients undergoing aortic valve repair, calculating survival and reoperation free rates.Results: Subjects were 49 men and 14 women aged 15 to 76 years (mean: 53±17 years). Mean preoperative aortic regurgitation grading of 1 to 4 was 3.2±0.7. Mean preoperative New York Heart Association functional class was 1.9±0.8. Two in-hospital deaths occurred. (3.2%) Mean aortic regurgitation grade at discharge was 1.3±0.8(p<0.0001; vs preoperative grade) and functional class was 1.1±0.2 (p<0.0001; vs preoperative class),—significantly improved. Overall follow-up was 98.4%, and mean follow-up continued 41.4±22.1 months. Mean functional class at follow-up was 1.2±0.4 (n=49), improved from preoperative class (p<0.0001). Mean aortic regurgitation grading at follow-up was 1.8±0.8 (n=41), improved from preoperative grading (p<0.0001). Five-year survival was 95.1±2.8%. One-year reoperation freedom was 96.6±2.4% and 5-year 77.9±6.9%.Conclusions: Survival after surgery was good, while reoperation was comparable to other reports but less satisfactory compared to reoperation freedom after aortic valve replacement. Based on reoperative findings, a change in indication was made. We believe technical refinements could improve postoperative results.     

Aortic regurgitation in rheumatoid arthritis necessitating aortic valve replacement.

Four cases of patients with aortic incompetence secondary to rheumatoid arthritis are presented. All survived aortic surgery (two having bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement and two a homograft aortic root replacement). A review of the pathophysiology and pathology of this rare cause of aortic regurgitation is presented. A rationale for the choice of aortic valve prosthesis is discussed.