Evaluating the risk of peri-umbilical hernia after sutured or sutureless gastroschisis closure

IntroductionWe evaluate the incidence, outcomes, and management of peri?umbilical hernias after sutured or sutureless gastroschisis closure.MethodsA retrospective, longitudinal follow-up of neonates with gastroschisis who underwent closure at 11 children's hospitals from 2013 to 2016 was performed. Patient encounters were reviewed through 2019 to identify the presence of a peri?umbilical hernia, time to spontaneous closure or repair, and associated complications.ResultsOf 397 patients, 375 had follow-up data. Sutured closure was performed in 305 (81.3%). A total of 310 (82.7%) infants had uncomplicated gastroschisis. Peri-umbilical hernia incidence after gastroschisis closure was 22.7% overall within a median follow-up of 2.5 years [IQR 1.3,3.9], and higher in those with uncomplicated gastroschisis who underwent primary vs. silo assisted closure (53.0% vs. 17.2%, p< 0.001). At follow-up, 50.0% of sutureless closures had a persistent hernia, while 16.4% of sutured closures had a postoperative hernia of the fascial defect (50.0% vs. 16.4%, p< 0.001). Spontaneous closure was observed in 38.8% of patients within a median of 17 months [9,26] and most frequently observed in those who underwent a sutureless primary closure (52.2%). Twenty-seven patients (31.8%) underwent operative repair within a median of 13 months [7,23.5]. Rate and interval of spontaneous closure or repair were similar between the sutured and sutureless closure groups, with no difference between those who underwent primary vs. silo assisted closure.ConclusionPeri-umbilical hernias after sutured or sutureless gastroschisis closure may be safely observed similar to congenital umbilical hernias as spontaneous closure occurs, with minimal complications and no additional risk with either closure approach.Levels of evidenceLevel II     

Is primary repair of gastroschisis and omphalocele always the best operation?

Optimal surgical management of neonates with gastroschisis and omphalocele remains controversial. Suggested benefits of primary fascial closure include earlier return of gastrointestinal function, decreased hospital stay, less sepsis, less risk of postoperative intestinal obstruction and fistulae, and lower mortality. Between 1978 and 1989, 40 neonates with gastroschisis or omphalocele underwent repair. Primary fascial repair was performed in 30 children, 18 of whom had a gastroschisis and 12 of whom had an omphalocele. Ten children had staged repair with the use of a silastic silo; seven of these had a gastroschisis and three an omphalocele. Comparison between the groups was made regarding birth weight, days on the ventilator before and after surgery, days to first feeding, days in the hospital after surgery, postoperative complications, and survival. There was no significant difference in birth weight, days on the ventilator, days to first feeding, and postoperative days in the hospital. There were nine complications in nine patients (30%) with primary repair and four complications in two patients (20%) with staged repair. Two infants died after primary repair (6.7%), and one (10%) died after staged closure. It was concluded that silastic silo repair and primary fascial closure are both acceptable alternatives. Primary closure is attractive whenever possible to avoid additional operations.     

Risk factors for perioperative hypothermia and infectious outcomes in gastroschisis patients

IntroductionPrior data suggest that infants with gastroschisis are at high risk for hypothermia and infectious complications (ICs). This study evaluated the associations between perioperative hypothermia (PH) and ICs in gastroschisis using a multi-institutional cohort.MethodsRetrospective review of infants with gastroschisis who underwent abdominal closure from 2013–2017 was performed at 7 children's hospitals. Any-IC and surgical site infection (SSI) were stratified against the presence or absence of PH, and perioperative characteristics associated with PH and SSI were determined using multivariable logistic regression.ResultsOf 256 gastroschisis neonates, 42% developed PH, with 18% classified as mild hypothermia (35.5–35.9°C), 10.5% as moderate (35.0–35.4°C), and 13% severe (<35°C). There were 82 (32%) ICs with 50 (19.5%) being SSIs. No associations between PH and any-IC (p = 0.7) or SSI (p = 0.98) were found. Pulmonary comorbidities (odds ratio (OR)=3.76, 95%CI:1.42–10, p = 0.008) and primary closure (OR=0.21, 95%CI:0.12–0.39, p<0.001) were associated with PH, while silo placement (OR=2.62, 95%CI:1.1–6.3, p = 0.03) and prosthetic patch (OR=3.42, 95%CI:1.4–8.3, p = 0.007) were associated with SSI on multivariable logistic regression.ConclusionsPrimary abdominal closure and pulmonary comorbidities are associated with PH in gastroschisis, however PH was not associated with increased risk of ICs. Independent risk factors for SSI include silo placement and prosthetic patch closure.     

An individualized approach to the management of gastroschisis

A 93% survival rate was achieved in 80 neonates treated for gastroschisis between 1979 and 1986. Uncomplicated gastroschisis occurred in 70 infants (88%); 51% underwent staged silo reduction and 49% had primary fascial closure. Gastroschisis associated with intestinal atresia or volvulus was present in 10 neonates (12%), half of whom had a residual jejunoileum between 10 and 55 cm. Major postoperative complications included gastrointestinal problems (infarction, obstruction, and prolonged dysfunction), wound infection, and catheter-associated difficulties (sepsis, infiltration, and malposition). Three of the six deaths were related to associated conditions (extreme prematurity, trisomy 13, and multiple anomalies) and three were caused by intraoperative hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, and extensive short-bowel syndrome. No statistical difference in morbidity, mortality, and length of hospitalization was demonstrated between infants treated by silo reduction and primary closure. Safe management of gastroschisis should include an individualized assessment of visceroabdominal disproportion and degree of intraabdominal tension. Vigilant expectation of potentially life-threatening complications is required to decrease postoperative morbidity, irrespective of the technique of abdominal wall closure.     

Improved outcomes in the treatment of gastroschisis using a preformed silo and delayed repair approach

Background/Purpose: The aim of this study was to critically evaluate the clinical outcomes of two different surgical treatment approaches for infants born with gastroschisis. Methods: The medical records of 65 infants with gastroschisis treated at one institution from 1991 to 2000 were available. Infants in group I (prior to December 1998) underwent attempted early repair of the gastroschisis defect on their first day of life. Infants in group II had delayed repair after the initial placement of a preformed silo. Results: Group I had 39 patients; group II had 26 patients. The two groups were equal with respect to maternal age, gestational age, and birth weight. Complete reduction and fascial closure were accomplished for 32 patients (82%) in group I and 25 patients (96%) in group II (P [lt ] .02). Median time on the ventilator was significantly less for group II (P [lt ] .0001). Infants in group II had shorter times until first postoperative feeding (P [lt ] .01) and full feedings (P [lt ] .006). Group II had fewer complications than group I (23% v 56%; P [lt ] .01). There appeared to be less necrotizing enterocolitis in group II. The average length of hospital stay was 14 days less for group II. Conclusions: The use of a preformed silo initially followed by delayed fascial closure in infants with gastroschisis is associated with improved fascial closure rates, fewer ventilator days, more rapid return of bowel function, and fewer complications compared with attempts at initial early repair. J Pediatr Surg 38:459-464.     

Variation in hospital costs for gastroschisis closure techniques

BackgroundIn newborns with gastroschisis, both primary repair and delayed fascial closure with initial silo placement are considered safe with similar outcomes although cost differences have not been explored.MethodsA retrospective review was performed of newborns admitted with gastroschisis at a single center from 2011 to 2016. Demographic, clinical, and cost data during the initial hospitalization were collected. Differences between procedure costs and clinical endpoints were analyzed using multivariable linear regression adjusting for prematurity, complicated gastroschisis, and performance of additional operations.Results80 patients with gastroschisis met inclusion criteria. Rates of primary fascial, primary umbilical cord closure, and delayed closure were 14%, 65%, and 21%, respectively. Delayed closure was associated with an increase in total hospital costs by 57% compared to primary repair (p < 0.001). In addition, delayed closure was associated with increased total and NICU LOS (p < 0.05), parenteral nutrition duration (p = 0.02), ventilator days (p < 0.001), time to goal enteral feeds (p = 0.01), and all cost sub-categories except ward room costs (p < 0.01).ConclusionDelayed fascial closure was associated with significantly greater hospital costs during the index admission.     

Management of complicated gastroschisis with porcine small intestinal submucosa and negative pressure wound therapy

Introduction

In almost all cases of gastroschisis, fascial closure may be achieved primarily or after silo reduction. Rarely, fascial and skin closure are impossible. We report our experience with visceral coverage in complicated cases of gastroschisis with porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) augmented by negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT).

Methods

Over a 3-year period, 55 infants with gastroschisis were managed. In 3 of these cases, fascia and skin could not be approximated safely after complete reduction of abdominal viscera with a spring-loaded silo. Visceral coverage in each case was achieved with 0.42-mm-thickness Surgisis ES (Cook Surgical, Bloomington, Ind) that was sewn to the fascial edges. Negative pressure wound therapy was then initiated at 75 mm Hg over the exposed SIS using vacuum-assisted closure.

Results

In each case, granulation tissue developed quickly and was followed by complete epithelialization. Two patients subsequently developed umbilical hernias.

Conclusion

We have successfully used SIS augmented by NPWT in the management of 3 infants with complicated gastroschisis. In the rare situation in which fascial closure cannot be achieved, the combination of SIS and NPWT can provide a safe and effective means of abdominal wall closure.     

Multi-institutional practice patterns and outcomes in uncomplicated gastroschisis: A report from the University of California Fetal Consortium (UCfC)

Background/PurposeGastroschisis is a resource-intensive birth defect without consensus regarding optimal surgical and medical management. We sought to determine best-practice guidelines by examining differences in multi-institutional practices and outcomes.MethodsSite-specific practice patterns were queried, and infant–maternal chart review was retrospectively performed for gastroschisis infants treated at 5 UCfC institutions (2007–2012). The primary outcome was length of stay. Univariate analysis was done to assess variation practices and outcomes by site. Multivariate models were constructed with site as an instrumental variable and with sites grouped by silo practice pattern adjusting for confounding factors.ResultsOf 191 gastroschisis infants, 164 infants were uncomplicated. Among uncomplicated patients, there were no deaths and only one case of necrotizing enterocolitis. Bivariate analysis revealed significant differences in practices and outcomes by site. Despite wide variations in practice patterns, there were no major differences in outcome among sites or by silo practice, after adjusting for confounding factors.ConclusionsWide variability exists in institutional practice patterns for infants with gastroschisis, but poor outcomes were not associated with expeditious silo or primary closure, avoidance of routine paralysis, or limited central line and antibiotic durations. Development of clinical pathways incorporating these practices may help standardize care and reduce health care costs.     

Selective management of gastroschisis.

Mortality of patients with gastroschisis has decreased from nearly 90% to 13% (14 of 106) during the period from 1967 to 1984. Coincident with advances in perioperative management, including parenteral nutrition and mechanical ventilation, has been the introduction of staged reduction of the viscera using prosthetic material. To assess the relative merits of primary closure, skin flap coverage, and silo reduction, operative treatment of 106 consecutive infants with gastroschisis was reviewed. Primary fascial closure was accomplished in 54 patients (52%). When fascial approximation resulted in excessive intra-abdominal pressure, the viscera were covered with lateral skin flaps in 10 infants (10%), or the defect was closed after staged reduction with a prosthetic silo in 40 infants (38%). Detailed analysis of the hospital records revealed no significant differences between the primary closure, skin flap, and silo groups with regard to duration of ileus (22 +/- 25, 30 +/- 27, 31 +/- 30 days), length of hospitalization (39 +/- 36, 54 +/- 37, 53 +/- 39 days), or mortality (6, 20, 18%). Respiratory, septic, hemorrhagic, renal, and wound complications occurred in significantly fewer patients with primary closure (36%) and skin flap coverage (30%) than in those with silos (68%) (p less than 0.05). Postoperative mortality was 12% (12/104) and was most often due to respiratory insufficiency (35%) or nonviable small bowel (19%). Primary fascial closure may be accomplished safely in a majority of patients with gastroschisis. However, no single operative strategy is ideal for all patients with gastroschisis, and initial treatment of individual defects should be tailored to the degree of visceroabdominal disproportion.     

Routine use of a SILASTIC spring-loaded silo for infants with gastroschisis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Background

Retrospective studies have suggested that routine use of a preformed silo for infants with gastroschisis may be associated with improved outcomes. We performed a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial to test this hypothesis.

Methods

Eligible infants were randomized to (1) routine bedside placement of a preformed Silastic spring-loaded silo, with gradual reduction and elective abdominal wall closure, or (2) primary closure.

Results

There were 27 infants in each group. There was no significant difference between groups with respect to age, weight, sex, Apgar scores, prenatal diagnosis, or mode of delivery. The total number of days on the ventilator was lower in the spring-loaded silo group, although it did not reach statistical significance (3.2 vs 5.3, P = .07). There was no significant difference between groups with respect to length of time on total parenteral nutrition, length of stay, or incidence of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis.

Conclusion

Routine use of a preformed silo was associated with similar outcomes to primary closure for infants with gastroschisis but with a strong trend toward fewer days on the ventilator. Use of a preformed silo has the advantage of permitting definitive abdominal wall closure in a more elective setting.     

Method to our madness: an 18-year retrospective analysis on gastroschisis closure

Background

The advent of preformed silos has facilitated routine bedside placement often without any attempt of intestinal reduction. It is unclear whether a strategy of routine silo (RS) placement with delayed fascial repair is beneficial over attempted primary repair (aPR) and silo placement only for those patients who cannot be reduced. We retrospectively compared clinical outcomes of neonates having aPR to those having RS placement to determine the impact of routine silo use and silo duration on gastroschisis care.

Methods

Neonatal records from patients with gastroschisis at a single children's hospital between 1990 and 2008 were reviewed. Demographic and outcome data were recorded and subjected to statistical analyses. Documentation of attempted intestinal reduction was used as a surrogate marker for aPR. The remaining patients were placed in the RS group.

Results

Two hundred forty-eight neonates with gastroschisis were identified. Thirteen were excluded for congenital or clinical issues which precluded aPR. Of the remaining 235 patients, neonates with RS had significantly more ventilator days (6.2 vs 4.4; P = .0011), more time of total parenteral nutrition (36.5 vs. 28.5; P = .0018), longer length of stay (LOS, 46.5 vs. 40.5; P = .0011), and greater hospital charges ($216,000 vs $172,000; P < .0001) than patients who had aPR. There was no significant difference observed in complications or survival. Linear regression modeling demonstrated that time to closure was significantly related to LOS as an independent variable. Each day to closure was associated with 2.2 extra days of hospitalization and approximately $9557 in hospital charges.

Conclusion

Although limited by retrospective biases, this study demonstrates that time to closure is the most significant variable related to LOS in gastroschisis. This relationship is intuitive since longer time to closure is probably determined by the severity of gastroschisis. The method of closure, by primary repair or silo, is of secondary importance. Conversely, unnecessarily increasing the time to closure may increase the LOS. The speed of reduction, whether through primary repair or by silo, should be guided by physiologic principles.     

Implementing a standardized gastroschisis protocol significantly increases the rate of primary sutureless closure without compromising closure success or early clinical outcomes

PurposeStandardized protocols have been shown to improve outcomes in several pediatric surgical conditions. We implemented a multi-disciplinary gastroschisis practice bundle at our institution in 2013. We sought to evaluate its impact on closure type and early clinical outcomes.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of uncomplicated gastroschisis patients treated at our institution between 2008–2019. Patients were divided into two groups: pre- and post-protocol implementation. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare closure location, method, and success.ResultsNeonates (pre-implementation n = 53, post-implementation n = 43) were similar across baseline variables. Successful immediate closure rates were comparable (75.5% vs. 72.1%, p = 0.71). The proportion of bedside closures increased significantly after protocol implementation (35.3% vs. 95.4%, p < 0.01), as did the proportion of sutureless closures (32.5% vs. 71.0%, p < 0.01). Median postoperative mechanical ventilation decreased significantly (4 days IQR [3, 5] vs. 2 days IQR [1, 3], p < 0.01). Postoperative complications and duration of parenteral nutrition were equivalent. After controlling for potential confounding, infants in the post-implementation group had a 44.0 times higher odds of undergoing bedside closure (95% CI: 9.0, 215.2, p < 0.01) and a 7.7 times higher odds of undergoing sutureless closure (95% CI: 2.3, 25.1, p < 0.01).ConclusionsImplementing a standardized gastroschisis protocol significantly increased the proportion of immediate bedside sutureless closures and decreased the duration of mechanical ventilation, without increasing postoperative complications.Level of Evidence IIIType of Study Retrospective comparative study.     

Opioid prescribing practices in a pediatric burn tertiary care facility: Is it time to change?

Opioids are the mainstay therapy in burned adults. Little data in the pediatric burn population exists that elucidates opioid prescribing practices. The primary purpose of this report is to quantify opioid and non-opioid analgesic use in pediatric burn patients admitted to a tertiary referral burn center. A retrospective audit of hospital charts and discharge records for patients <18 years old from March 2016 to March 2017 was performed. Opioid amounts were converted to either oral morphine miligram equivalents (MME) or oral MME per day and subsequently adjusted for age in kilograms (kg). Of the 226 patients, 223 (98.7%) were administered an opioid during admission. The median total opioid amount administered during admission was 0.4 (IQR: 0.3–0.6) mg oral MME per kilogram per day. Anecdotally, doses above 1 mg/kg/day are considered high risk for opioid tolerance. The median total opioid amount prescribed upon discharge was high at 3.9 (IQR: 2.3, 5.6) mg of oral MME per kilogram. Hydrocodone (96.0%) was the most common opioid administered, followed by morphine (88.1%). The most commonly prescribed discharge opioid was hydrocodone (95.4%). Non-opoioid analgesia during admission was used in 112 patients (49.6%). This study provides novel insight into the opioid practices at a tertiary burn center for pediatric patients, with our analysis showcasing high usage of opioids during admission and discharge for burn analgesia. It emphasizes the need to expand beyond opioids for burn analgesia and the importance of promoting non-opioid, multimodal analgesia in the pediatric burn population.     

No free ride? The hidden costs of delayed operative management using a spring-loaded silo for gastroschisis

Purpose

The ideal management of gastroschisis (primary vs staged closure) has not yet been established. Despite the ease of silo placement, anecdotal experience shows that silos do not always offer benefit. The aim of this study was to highlight concerns regarding use of spring loaded silos and compare outcomes to primary closure.

Methods

Thirty-seven neonates with gastroschisis treated with either primary (n = 10) or staged closure with a spring-loaded silo (n = 27) were reviewed (1998-2007). Variables included ventilator days, daily intravenous fluid, hospital days, and complication rates. SPSS (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill) was used to perform t test and χ² analyses (significance P < .05).

Results

Survival for primary closure was 100% (10/10) compared to 89% (24/27) for staged closure (P = .548). Patients managed with silos required prolonged ventilation (16.1 ± 4 days vs 3.6 ± 1 days; P ≤ .05) and greater intravenous fluids on days 3, 4, and 5 of life (132 ± 25 mL/kg per day vs 104 ± 18 mL/kg per day; P ≤ .01). Although there was no difference in the complication rates between the groups, several problems were evident in the silo group: 15% (4/27) required silo replacement, 44% (12/27) required fascial defect enlargement for silo placement, and 19% (5/27) required mesh at closure. No significant differences in recovery of intestinal function were observed. Three silo patients developed ischemic complications because of vascular insufficiency at the level of the abdominal wall, leading to significant intestinal loss, ventilator and total parenteral nutrition dependence, and increased hospital stay.

Conclusions

Patients managed with a silo had longer ventilator requirements and greater fluid needs. This Specific technical complications leading to bowel ischemia were notable in the silo group. The silo should be carefully placed to avoid bowel twisting and the funnel effect. Larger prospective studies should be performed to provide decision-making criteria for the use of a silo vs primary closure.     

An enhanced recovery after surgery pathway in pediatric colorectal surgery improves patient outcomes

IntroductionEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in adult colorectal surgery are known to reduce complications, readmissions, and length of stay (LOS). However, there is a paucity of ERAS data for pediatric colorectal surgery.MethodsA 2014–2018 single-institution, retrospective cohort study was performed on pediatric colorectal surgery patients (2–18 years) pre- and post-ERAS pathway implementation. Bivariate analysis and linear regression were used to determine if ERAS pathway implementation reduced total morphine milligram equivalents per kilogram (MME/kg), LOS, and time to oral intake.Results98 (70.5%) and 41 (29.5%) patients were managed with ERAS and non-ERAS pathways, respectively. There was no statistical difference in age, sex, diagnosis, or use of laparoscopic technique between cohorts. The ERAS cohort experienced a significant reduction in total MME/kg, Foley duration, time to oral intake, and LOS with no increase in complications. The presence of an ERAS pathway reduced the total MME/kg (? 0.071, 95% CI ? 0.10, ? 0.043) when controlling for covariates.ConclusionThe use of an ERAS pathway reduces opioid utilization, which is associated with a reduction in LOS and expedites the initiation of oral intake, in colorectal pediatric surgery patients. Pediatric ERAS pathways should be incorporated into the care of pediatric patients undergoing colorectal surgery.Level of evidenceLevel III evidence.Type of studyRetrospective cohort study.     

Opioid administration in the prehospital setting for patients sustaining traumatic injuries: An evaluation of national emergency medical services data

IntroductionDespite concerns about long-term dependence, opioids remain the mainstay of treatment for acute pain from traumatic injuries. Additionally, early pain management has been associated with improved long-term outcomes in injured patients. We sought to identify the patterns of prehospital pain management across the United States.MethodsWe used 2019 national emergency medical services (EMS) data to identify the use of pain management for acutely injured patients. Opioid specific dosing was calculated in morphine milligram equivalents (MME). The effects of opioids as well as adverse events were identified through objective patient data and structured provider documentation.ResultsWe identified a total of 3,831,768 injured patients, 85% of whom were treated by an advanced life support (ALS) unit. There were 269,281 (7.0%) patients treated with opioids, including a small number of patients intubated by EMS (n = 1537; 0.6%). The median opioid dose was 10 MME [IQR 5–10] and fentanyl was the most commonly used opioid (88.2%). Patients treated with opioids had higher initial pain scores documented by EMS than those not receiving opioids (median: 9 vs 4, p<0.001), and had a median reduction in pain score of 3 points (IQR 1–5) based on the final prehospital pain score. Adverse events associated with opioid administration, including episodes of altered mental status (n = 453; 0.2%) and respiratory compromise (n = 252; 0.1%), were rare. For patients with severe pain (≥8/10), 27.3% of patients with major injuries (ISS ≥15) were treated with opioids, compared with 24.8% of those with moderate injuries (ISS 9–14), and 21.4% of those with minor (ISS 1–8) injuries (p<0.001).ConclusionThe use of opioids in the prehospital setting significantly reduced pain among injured patients with few adverse events. Despite its efficacy and safety, the majority of patients with major injuries and severe pain do not receive opioid analgesia in the prehospital setting.     

The jury is still out: changes in gastroschisis management over the last decade are associated with both benefits and shortcomings

PurposeManagement of gastroschisis has shifted from early primary closure to preformed silo placement and delayed closure. We aimed to identify how closure techniques have changed and how outcomes have been affected.MethodsRecords of patients undergoing gastroschisis closure at a single institution from 2000 to 2009 were reviewed. Patient characteristics and outcomes were collected and compared among those undergoing primary closure vs preformed silo placement. Outcomes were also compared in an era when primary closure predominated (2000-2002) vs one when primary silo predominated (2003-2009).ResultsFrom 2000 to 2009, 203 patients underwent gastroschisis closure. Primary closure was performed in 50% of patients from 2000 to 2002 vs 12.3% from 2003 to 2009. Preformed silos were placed in 34.7% of patients from 2000 to 2002 vs 84.4% from 2003 to 2009. Patients treated from 2000 to 2002 experienced shorter hospital stays and shorter time to achievement of full enteral nutrition. Patients treated from 2003 to 2009 developed fewer ventral hernias and wound infections and required less ventilator days. Patients undergoing early primary closure developed ventral hernias at higher rates compared with those treated with preformed silos. Intensive care unit stay was longer for patients receiving preformed silos.ConclusionChange in our management strategy has resulted in prolonged intensive care unit stay and time to full feeds but reduced postoperative hernias and wound infections.     

The effect of initial operative repair on the recovery of intestinal function in gastroschisis

Recent reports concerning the treatment of gastroschisis suggest that primary closure results in more rapid return of gastrointestinal function, a shortened hospitalization, diminished perinatal complications, and improved long-term survival. A 4-year retrospective review of infants treated for gastroschisis at the University of Florida yielded 30 infants requiring repair of this abdominal wall defect. The series included 19 males and 11 females, and the average abdominal wall defect measured 4 cm in its greatest dimension. Nine infants (mean weight, 2,275 gm) were repaired using a staged closure using a silastic (six) or cutaneous (three) silo. Complete fascial closure was accomplished in an average of 8 days in the silastic group and 15 days in the infants with skin flaps. Mean age at start of enteral feeds was 23 days, with complete oral feedings at 43 days. Twenty-one infants (mean weight, 2,127 gm) underwent primary fascial closure. Three deaths occurred in the perioperative period: one from acute renal failure and two from sepsis secondary to a segment of necrotic intestine. An additional infant developed postoperative necrotizing entercolitis but recovered. Two infants in this group also had jejuno-ileal atresia requiring extensive small bowel resection. In the remaining 15 infants, oral alimentation was initiated for an average of 23 days, with full oral alimentation at 46 days. The data suggest that the recovery of the gastrointestinal system, adequate enough to support total oral alimentation, is unrelated to the initial surgical procedure chosen to obtain fascial closure in the newborn with gastroschisis. In addition, vigorous attempts at primary fascial closure may jeopardize intestinal viability, diminish ventilatory function, and result in unnecessary morbidity and mortality.