Barrett’s esophagus after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

1. Download : Download high-res image (371KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Underwater versus conventional EMR for colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis

1. Download : Download high-res image (324KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

1. Download : Download high-res image (377KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Impact of second-generation transoral incisionless fundoplication on atypical GERD symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

1. Download : Download high-res image (425KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Sedentary behavior and the risk of stroke: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

Background and aimsThe sedentary behavior in people's daily life has continued to increase in recent years, causing many studies to focus on its relationship with diseases. Several studies have shown that sedentary behavior is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and metabolic disease. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the association between sedentary behavior and the risk of stroke.Methods and resultsTwo independent investigators searched for prospective cohort studies on the association between sedentary behavior and stroke risk, published before February 2022. We pooled adjusted effect size and performed the dose-response analysis by random-effect model. Seven studies with 677,614 participants and 15,135 stroke events during a median follow-up of 12.2 years were included. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) of stroke was 1.16 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09–1.24) with no significant heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.983). In dose-response analysis, a nonlinear association between sedentary behavior and stroke risk was discovered. Stroke risk began to increase when sedentary time exceeded 3.7 h/d (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.97–1.05). And when reached 11 h/d, a significantly increased risk of stroke was observed (HR, 1.21; 95% CI 1.12–1.31).ConclusionA nonlinear association was found in the dose-response analysis, with increased risk only when sedentary time exceeded a certain level. Further research is needed to explain the biological mechanisms by which sedentary time above a certain threshold significantly increases stroke risk. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022311544)     

Coexistence of alcohol-related pancreatitis and alcohol-related liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundAvailable estimates of coexistent alcohol-related pancreatitis (ALP) and alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) vary widely, and factors that determine coexistent disease are largely unknown. We performed a systematic review of published literature with the primary aim to generate robust estimates for coexistent alcohol-related chronic pancreatitis (ACP) and alcohol-related cirrhosis (ALC).MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases from inception until February 2018. Studies included were those in English-language, sample size ≥25 and allowed calculation of the coexistent disease. Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects model approach.ResultsTwenty-nine (including 5 autopsy studies) of 2000 eligible studies met inclusion criteria. Only 6.9% included patients were female. Fifteen studies enabled calculation of ACP in ALC, and 11 for ALC in ACP. Pooled prevalence of ACP in ALC was 16.2% (95% CI 10.4–24.5) overall, and 15.5% (95% CI 8.0–27.7) when data were limited to clinical studies. Corresponding prevalence for ALC in ACP was 21.5% (95% CI 12.0–35.6) and 16.9% (95% CI 11.5–24.3), respectively. There was significant heterogeneity among studies (I² – 65–92%). Pooled prevalence for ALP in ALD or ALD in ALP in clinical studies were 15.2% and 39%, respectively. None of the studies reported outcomes in patients with coexistent disease.ConclusionA sizeable fraction of patients with ACP or ALC have coexistent disease. Future studies should define the prevalence of coexistent disease in women and minority populations, and the consequences of coexistent disease on clinical presentation and short- and long-term outcomes.     

Comparison of EUS-guided endoscopic transpapillary and percutaneous gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis: a systematic review with network meta-analysis

1. Download : Download high-res image (347KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Triple versus LAMA/LABA combination therapy for Japanese patients with COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundIn symptomatic COPD patients with a history of exacerbations, additional treatment with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) to long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) combination therapy is recommended based on the evidence of low incidence of exacerbations but with a caution for pneumonia. However, ethnic differences may affect the response to drugs. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this treatment in the Japanese population (PROSPERO: CRD42020191978).MethodsWe searched relevant randomized control trials and analyzed the exacerbations, quality of life, lung function, and adverse events including pneumonia and mortality as the outcomes of interest.ResultsWe identified a total of three RCTs (N = 632). Treatment with ICS/LAMA/LABA triple therapy significantly decreased the exacerbations (rate ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.85) and improved the trough FEV₁ (mean difference, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.07) compared to LAMA/LABA therapy. However, triple therapy showed a significantly higher incidence of pneumonia compared to LAMA/LABA (odds ratio, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.58 to 7.22). Concerning other adverse events including mortality, there were no significant difference between these therapies.ConclusionsIn the current meta-analysis of the Japanese population, we confirmed that triple therapy causes a higher incidence of pneumonia than LAMA/LABA treatment but is a more preferable treatment since it showed a lower incidence of exacerbations and higher trough FEV₁ in patients with symptomatic moderate to severe COPD. However, since the sample sizes were not statistically large enough, further trials involving Japanese patients are needed.     

Diagnostic accuracy of urinary antigen tests for legionellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundUrinary antigen tests (UATs) have been used for the early detection of legionellosis and have demonstrated moderate sensitivity and high specificity. However, the most recent systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2009 evaluated the accuracy of UATs; since then, UAT accuracy may have changed owing to advances and developments in UAT technology and epidemiological changes in the frequency of Legionella species that cause legionellosis. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to update the accuracy of UATs for legionellosis among patients with suspected pneumonia.MethodsOverall, 1326 studies were screened, 21 of which fulfilled the eligibility criteria for quality assessment and meta-analysis. Data from 5772 patients, including 1368 (23.7%) with the target condition (i.e., suspected legionellosis), were included in the analysis. The overall quality of the included studies, which was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool, was unclear.ResultsThe calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71–0.85) and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.99–1.00), respectively. Subpopulation analysis revealed that the accuracy of UATs for sensitivity and specificity for Legionella pneumophilia serogroup 1 was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78–0.91) and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.99–1.00), respectively.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that the sensitivity and specificity of UATs were moderate and high, respectively, which is comparable to the results reported in 2009. Therefore, UATs may be a useful method for the early detection of legionellosis caused by Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1.Clinical trial registrationThe review protocol was prospectively registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000041080).     

Complications of a lung biopsy for severe respiratory failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the complications of lung biopsy in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF), including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).MethodsWe searched the MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The primary outcomes were biopsy-related death, respiratory failure, cardiac complications, bleeding, and other major complications. We used the McMaster Quality Assessment Scale of Harms (McHarm) to evaluate the risk of bias. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled frequencies.ResultsThirteen studies (consisting of 574 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Furthermore, most of the included studies had a high or unclear risk of bias in half of the items in McHarm. All included studies evaluated surgical lung biopsies. The median overall hospital mortality was 53% (range: 17%–90%). The pooled frequencies of biopsy-related death, respiratory failure, cardiac complication, bleeding, and other major complications were 0.00% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.00%–0.21%), 1.30% (95% CI: 0.00%–5.69%), 1.03% (95% CI: 0.00%–3.73%), 1.46% (95% CI: 0.16%–3.56%), and 4.26% (95% CI: 0.00%–13.0%), respectively.ConclusionsThe results of this study will be valuable information in considering the indications of lung biopsy in patients with ARF, including ARDS.Trial registrationThe protocol was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN 000040650).