Evaluating YouTube as a Patient Information Source for the Risks of Root Canal Treatment

IntroductionYouTube is one of the most used social media platforms for health care information. Misinformation and poor educational content on this platform can exacerbate public anxiety and fear of root canal treatment. This study aimed to investigate the quality of videos examining risks of root canal treatment on YouTube.MethodsYouTube was searched using a combination of keywords relating to endodontic complications to replicate goal-orientated browsing. Video quality was assessed using a modified DISCERN score and global quality score by 2 authors independently. Manifest quantitative content analysis was used to capture information about the video and extent of interactions. The 10 most viewed videos were further analyzed in terms of the messaging and format of the videos.ResultsThe mean overall quality of the videos was relatively low (2.20). Videos produced by regulatory bodies had the highest mean score (3.00) and the shortest mean length (2 minutes 23 seconds) but had the fewest views and interactions. The poorest quality videos (mean 1.5) were produced by nonclinicians and news/media, which tended to be longer (mean 8 minutes 49 seconds) and received more engagement. Across all videos, information related to patient decision making tended to be poorly presented.ConclusionsThe dental community, particularly institutions and organizations, need to strategically create engaging videos to redress patients’ concerns about root canal treatment. This can counterbalance the existing misleading information and improve access to evidence-based content, which will ultimately affect patient decision making.     

Quantitative and qualitative analyses of orthodontic-related videos on YouTube

ObjectivesTo investigate content of orthodontic-related videos on YouTube to improve the understanding of orthodontic patients'' perceptions and treatment experiences.Materials and MethodsA systematic search was conducted on YouTube on March 20, 2018, and updated on August 4, 2019, to identify all relevant videos using search terms “orthodontic,” “orthodontics,” “braces,” and “orthodontic braces.” The data set was captured from YouTube Data API (Application Programming Interface) and stored in an Excel database using a query function written in Python. All videos captured were viewed and categorized by three independent dental investigators using thematic analysis. The top 100 videos (by view count) related to patients'' treatment experience were further analyzed using discourse analysis.ResultsA total of 600 orthodontic videos were screened, and 546 were included in the study. Six main themes were identified: (1) individual review of orthodontic treatment (45.8%, n = 250), (2) entertainment (19.8%, n = 108), (3) education (18.3%, n = 100), (4) advertisements (6.6%, n = 36), (5) time lapse of orthodontic treatment (5.3%, n = 29), and (6) do-it-yourself orthodontics (4.2%, n = 23). Of the top 100 videos related to patient''s individual review of treatment, patients'' main focuses were on pain (24%), problems with chewing and swallowing (12%), and adhesive removal (10%).ConclusionsOrthodontic-related YouTube videos are diverse in nature. The most common video category was video providing an individual review of orthodontic treatment experience. Other popular video categories included entertainment, education, and advertisements. A range of do-it-yourself YouTube videos were also identified. YouTube may provide an opportunity for orthodontic professionals to disseminate health information.     

YouTube™ as an information resource for orthognathic surgery

Objective: To investigate video content on YouTube? related to orthognathic surgery.

Materials and methods: YouTube? was searched using the terms: orthognathic surgery; orthodontic surgery; jaw surgery; jaw corrective surgery. Inclusion criteria included English language; primary content orthognathic surgery and acceptable audio-visual quality. Videos were sorted into the top 50 for each search term by view-count and into an overall top 60 from the four searches. The following parameters were recorded for each video: number of views; likes; dislikes; source; primary intention. Each was classified according to information content as ‘excellent’, ‘moderate’ or ‘poor’. A pre-determined list of orthognathic surgery-related information domains was also evaluated.

Results: The top 60 videos had a combined total of 6,986,141 views. Videos predominantly involved patients describing their personal experience (41.67%) with the majority positively biased (61.67%). Only 9.17% of videos were classified as having excellent general information content and 55.83% were rated as poor. Surgical procedures were described in 45% whilst the need for pre- and post-surgical orthodontics was discussed in 33% and 16%, respectively. Post-operative paraesthesia was discussed in 17.5% of videos outcome.

Conclusions: Video content on YouTube? relating to orthognathic surgery is substandard and patients should be advised to view it with caution.     

YouTube as a source of information about orthodontic clear aligners

ObjectivesTo evaluate the content, reliability, and quality of videos about orthodontic clear aligners on YouTube.Materials and MethodsResearchers used the Google Trends website to determine that the most frequently used search term for orthodontic clear aligners on the Internet was: “Invisalign.” A search was then conducted on YouTube using the key word “Invisalign.” From the first 140 results, 100 videos were selected for analysis. A 13-point content score was used to classify poor-content and rich-content videos, and the global quality scale (GQS) was used to examine quality of the videos. To evaluate reliability of the information, a five-question scale was used. The Mann-Whitney U-test, χ² test, and Pearson correlation coefficients were used for statistical evaluations.ResultsOf the YouTube videos, 33 were classified as rich content and 67 as poor content. Most videos (73%) were uploaded by laypeople, and most uploaders (71%) were women. The most commonly discussed content was instructions (65%), followed by procedure (57%) and pain (52%). Regarding the GQS, most of the videos were evaluated as moderate quality (51%). Compared with the poor-content video group, the rich-content video group had a significantly higher GQS score (P = .004). There was no significant difference between the poor-content and rich-content groups regarding information reliability (P > .05).ConclusionsVideo content on YouTube relating to aligner orthodontics was generally insufficient. The quality of videos was moderate, but the reliability of information was generally poor. Specialists should refer patients to reliable sources of information.     

Cosmetic facial surgery: are online resources reliable and do patients understand them?

Our aim was to assess the quality and readability of online resources regarding common cosmetic maxillofacial procedures. We searched Google for “rhytidectomy”, “rhinoplasty”, “orthognathic surgery”, “genioplasty”, “malar implants”, “blepharoplasty”, “otoplasty”, and related terms. In each case we assessed the top 50 results for quality and readability. Quality was measured using the DISCERN questionnaire, benchmark criteria published by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), and accreditation by the HONcode (Health On the Net code). The Flesch-Kincaid reading grade, Flesch reading ease score, Gunning’s fog index, and the Coleman-Liau index, were used to measure readability. A total of 350 sites were assessed and 200 were included in the study. The mean (SD) JAMA and DISCERN scores for all included websites indicated poor quality (0.49/4 (1.07) and 32.77/80 (10.57), respectively). Only eight sites (4%) were certified by the HONcode. There was a significant association between low DISCERN scores and Google Ads (p = 0.009) and between low DISCERN scores and the websites of private clinicians or hospitals (p < 0.001). The mean (SD) Flesch reading ease score and Gunning’s fog score both indicated poor readability that required a moderately high level of literacy (50.59 (11.82) and 13.83 (2.76), respectively). The Flesch-Kincaid and Coleman-Liau scores indicated similar results. Adherence to the JAMA benchmark, certification by the HONcode, and relevant selection on Google Ads would improve quality. The avoidance of medical jargon and use of shorter sentences would improve readability and provide patients with comprehensible explanations that would allow them to have realistic expectations and take responsibility for their own health.     

Does the presence of maxillary midline diastema influence the perception of dentofacial esthetics in video analysis?

ObjectiveTo evaluate the influence of a midline diastema on dentofacial esthetic perceptions of orthodontists, restorative dental specialists or prosthodontists, and laypersons in a frontal facial evaluation performed by means of video.Materials and MethodsTwo individuals aged between 20 and 25 years, one of each gender, with presence of a midline diastema were selected. An acrylic resin mockup was made of the maxillary anterior region, simulating ideal conditions of smile esthetics. Four standardized frontal view videos of the complete face were filmed of each individual in the following situations: with the ideal smile (unchanged mockup) and with the presence of midline diastemas of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mm created by the mockup. In all videos, the patient said a certain sentence and, at the end, simulated a posed smile. Dentofacial esthetic perceptions of all four videos of each individual were evaluated by 51 orthodontists, 51 restorative dental specialists or prosthodontists, and 51 laypersons by means of visual analog scales. Data were evaluated using analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test, with the level of significance set at 5%.ResultsThe most attractive videos for all groups of examiners were those without diastema and with a diastema of 0.5 mm, for both the woman and the man. For a diastema of 1 mm or 1.5 mm, the dentofacial characteristics were considered unesthetic.ConclusionsDiastemas equal to or greater than 1 mm negatively influence dentofacial esthetics in a frontal facial evaluation performed by means of video.     

Evaluation of the content quality of websites for recurrent aphthous ulcers and oral lichen planus

Background

The Internet is one of the most popular resources for people to obtain medical information; however, only a limited number of studies have reported the quality of the available health information related to oral mucosal diseases. The present study aimed to evaluate the quality of information on websites for recurrent aphthous ulcers (RAU) and oral lichen planus (OLP), in both Chinese and English.

Methods

Common search engines, BaiDu, Google, and Yahoo in Chinese; and Bing, Google, and Yahoo in English were used to identify websites providing content related to the oral mucosal diseases. The first 100 links for keywords “recurrent aphthous ulcers” and “oral lichen planus” were visited and content was downloaded within 24 h. Two separate trained researchers use the validated DISCERN rating instrument and JAMA benchmarks to evaluate the content. The rating scores were analyzed and the quality was assessed according to the scores and content of websites.

Results

A total of 145 websites for RAU and 128 of OLP were analyzed. Based on the DISCERN instrument, the quality of the content in websites for both diseases, whether in English or Chinese, was not high, generally scoring 2 to 3 (max. 5). Only 13 of the RAU websites and 21 of the OLP websites fulfilled the four criteria of the JAMA benchmarks. Generally, the scores of the English websites were higher than those of the Chinese websites. During the twelve searches, only four (Yahoo of RAU in Chinese, Bing and Yahoo of RAU in English, and Google of OLP in Chinese) showed moderate correlation between the website’s ranking and their rating scores. People cannot obtain high quality medical information if they only look at the top ranked sites on the viewing lists. Websites belonging to universities or medical centers had relatively higher scores compared with the others.

Conclusions

The quality of the content on websites relating to RAU and OLP in Chinese and English was moderate. More good quality websites and information are needed in the future.

     

Lingual orthodontic treatment: A YouTube™ video analysis

Objectives:The aim of this study was to examine the quality of information offered for patients seeking information on lingual orthodontic treatment.Materials and Methods:YouTube™ was searched for videos about lingual orthodontic treatment using the key word “lingual braces” from the Google Trends application. One hundred and four videos were selected to be analyzed from the first 120 results. The video content was evaluated using a 10-point score, which was used for classifying low- and high-content video groups. The video information and quality index (VIQI) was applied to determine the quality of the videos. The Mann-Whitney U-test, Chi-square test, and logistic regression analysis were used, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated for statistical evaluations.Results:We classified 32 videos as high-content and 72 as low-content. Most videos were uploaded by laypeople (58.7%, n = 61). Definition of lingual braces and psychological impact were the most commonly discussed topics (51.0%), followed by speech performance (47.1%), pain (44.2%), tongue soreness (37.5%), and biomechanics (14.4%). Compared to the low-content group, the high-content video group had a significantly higher mean number of views (19,867.41 vs 6720.08, P = .002) and more “likes” (135.88 vs 13.01, P < .001), “dislikes” (4.34 vs 0.81, P < .001), and “comments” (26.28 vs 5.31, P = .002). There was no difference in the total VIQI score between the groups (P = .009).Conclusions:The content of YouTube™ videos for lingual orthodontics was generally incomplete. Most videos mentioned psychological effects, but few videos discussed the biomechanics or procedure. Orthodontists should be aware of the information available on YouTube™.     

Adult orthodontics: a quality assessment of Internet information

Objectives: This study evaluated the quality, reliability and readability of information on the Internet on adult orthodontics. Design: A quality assessment of adult orthodontic websites. Setting: Postgraduate Orthodontic Unit, Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Cork, Ireland. Method: An Internet search using three search engines (Google, Yahoo and Bing) was conducted using the terms (‘adult orthodontics’ and ‘adult braces’). The first 50 websites from each engine and under each search term were screened and exclusion criteria applied. Included websites were then assessed for quality using four methods: the HON seal, JAMA benchmarks, the DISCERN instrument and the LIDA tool. Readability of included websites was assessed using the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES). Results: Only 13 websites met the inclusion criteria. Most were of US origin (n?=?8; 61%). The authors of the websites were dentists (n?=?5; 39%), professional organizations (n?=?2; 15%), past patients (n?=?2; 15%) and unspecified (n?=?4; 31%). Only 1 website displayed the HON seal and three websites contained all JAMA benchmarks. The mean overall score for DISCERN was 3.9/5 and the mean total LIDA score was 115/144. The average FRES score was 63.1/100. Conclusions: The number of informative websites on adult orthodontics is low and these are of moderate quality. More accurate, high-quality Internet resources are required on adult orthodontics. Recommendations are made as to how this may be achieved.     

A Review of the Protocol of SDF Therapy for Arresting Caries

ObjectiveThe aim of this work was to review the protocol of the use of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) for arresting caries, specifically the application time.MethodTwo researchers searched manufacturers’ instructions, YouTube videos, and 5 databases (Embase, Medline, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). Manufacturers’ instructions, videos from national dental organisations, and peer-reviewed journal articles that published the SDF application protocol in English for arresting caries were selected.ResultsThe review included 14 protocols from 15 publications from 4 manufacturers, 3 dental associations, and 7 author teams (one team had 2 articles). The American Dental Association and the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry provided their SDF application protocols on YouTube. The American Academy of Paediatric Dentistry and 7 author teams published their protocols in journal articles. Seven publications suggested an SDF application time of 60 seconds. Seven publications suggested a time range of 10 seconds to 240 seconds. Two publications suggested caries excavation, but 4 publications suggested no caries excavation before SDF application. The procedures from at least 5 publications involved protecting the gingiva with petroleum jelly, isolating the carious tooth with cotton rolls, drying the carious lesion with a 3-in-1 syringe, applying SDF solution with a micro brush for 60 seconds, removing excess SDF solution with gauze, and applying fluoride varnish to the SDF-treated lesion.ConclusionsAlthough the SDF application protocol is simple and straightforward, the published protocols could be different. Most publications suggested an SDF application time of 60 seconds, which can be long, particularly for young children and older adults.     

The Influence of the Maxillary Posterior Region on Smile Aesthetics in a Chinese Cohort

ObjectivesThe aim of this research was to establish standard norms for posterior smile-related characteristics including posterior smile line (PSL), the most posterior teeth displayed, buccal corridor ratio (BCR), and buccal corridor symmetry (BCS) and investigate its aesthetic contributions to smile attractiveness in a Chinese population.Materials and methodsFrom digitally recorded dynamic smile videos of young Chinese participants, 188 standardised full-smile images were captured and then aesthetically evaluated by 22 laypersons using a visual analog scale (VAS). Four smile-related variables in the posterior region were analysed. VAS data were compared between subgroups to test the influence of these variables on smile aesthetics with significance level of P < .05.ResultsThe VAS scores of participants with high PSL were significantly lower than those with average or low PSL (P < .01), especially when they display average or low anterior smile line (P < .05). Smiles with the second premolar displayed obtained the highest VAS amongst the 3 subgroups (P < .05). No significant differences were found between the VAS scores of BCR and BCS (P > .05).ConclusionsMaxillary posterior gingiva and teeth displayed influence smile attractiveness evaluated by laypersons, which should be given attention when treating patients with compromised aesthetics, especially those displaying average or low anterior smile lines.     

The effect of therapeutic radiation on dental enamel and dentin: A systematic review

ObjectivesThe conventional radiotherapy protocol to treat head-and-neck cancer is usually followed by tooth-decay onset. Radiation impact on mineralized tooth structures is not well-understood. This systematic review aimed to collect the recorded effects of therapeutic radiation on tooth chemical, structural and mechanical properties, in relation with their means of investigation.DataSystematic search (January 01 2012 – September 30 2021) terms were “Radiotherapy”, “Radiation effects”, “Dental enamel”, “Dentin”, “Human” and “Radiotherapy” NOT “Laser”.SourcesPubMed, DOSS and Embase databases were searched.Study selectionSelected studies compared dental enamel, coronal and root dentin properties before and after in vitro or in vivo irradiation up to 80 Gy.ResultsThe systematic search identified 353 different articles, with 28 satisfying inclusion criteria. Their reference lists provided two more. Twenty-two studies evaluated dental enamel evolution, nine assessed coronal dentin and eight concerned root dentin. Coronal and root dentin results indicate a major impact of the radiation on their organic matrix. Dental enamel’s chemical properties are less modified. Enamel and root dentin’s hardness are decreased by therapeutic radiation, but no consensus arises for coronal dentin.ConclusionsOur findings revealed some interesting information about enzymatic degradation mechanisms of dentin organic matrix and highlighted that dental hard-tissue characterization requires highly specific expertise in materials science. That scientific knowledge is necessary to design suitable protocols, adequately analyze the obtained data, and, thus, provide relevant conclusions.Clinical Significance statementBetter knowledge and understanding of the mechanisms involved in the degradation of enamel and dentin would enable development of new preventive and therapeutic methods for improved medical care of patients undergoing radiotherapy.     

Clinical photography vs digital video clips for the assessment of smile esthetics

Objective: To test the null hypothesis that there is no clinically significant difference between the post–orthodontic treatment images of smiles of subjects captured by clinical photography and the smiles of the same subjects obtained from digital video clips.Materials and Methods:Clinical photographs and digital video captures were obtained from 48 orthodontically treated patients. An updated version of the Smile Mesh^TM program was used to quantify and compare smile characteristics obtained with the two methods. A paired-samples t-test was performed to test for mean differences in Smile Mesh measurements generated from both smile images. The relationship between the various Smile Mesh measurements obtained from both smile images was examined by way of Pearson product-moment correlation.Results:A significant difference was found between 7 of the 14 mean Smile Mesh measurements. The absolute values of all these differences, however, were smaller than 1 mm and therefore were not clinically significant. With the exception of lower lip to maxillary incisor, all measurements showed a moderate to strong relation with each other (P values ranging from .47 to .82; P < .001).Conclusions:The hypothesis cannot be rejected. A significant positive correlation was noted between Smile Mesh measurements obtained from smiles captured by clinical photography and those captured with digital video clips. This supports the conclusion that a standard digital photograph appears to be a valid tool for analysis of the posttreatment smile.     

YouTube, dentistry, and dental education

The objective of this study was to systematically assess the informational value, intention, source, and bias of videos related to dentistry available on the video-sharing Internet platform YouTube. YouTube (www.youtube.com) was searched for videos related to dentistry, using the system-generated sorts "by relevance" and "most viewed" and two categories (All and Education). Each of the first thirty results was rated by two assessors filling out a questionnaire for each (total: 120). The data were subjected to statistical analysis using Cohen's kappa, Pearson's correlation coefficient tau, Mann-Whitney U-tests, and a nonparametric three-way ANOVA, including an analysis of the interaction between the sorting and category effect, with an α-level of 5 percent. The scan produced 279,000 results in the category All and 5,050 in the category Education. The analysis revealed a wide variety of information about dentistry available on YouTube. The purpose of these videos includes entertainment, advertising, and education. The videos classified under Education have a higher degree of usefulness and informational value for laypersons, dental students, and dental professionals than those found in a broader search category. YouTube and similar social media websites offer new educational possibilities that are currently both underdeveloped and underestimated in terms of their potential value. Dentists and dental educators should also recognize the importance of these websites in shaping public opinion about their profession.     

Assessing the Influence of Skin Color and Tooth Shade Value on Perceived Smile Attractiveness

BackgroundThe authors conducted a study to determine whether variations in skin color would influence perceptions of smile attractiveness for a given tooth shade value.

MethodsUsing a photograph of a woman smiling, the authors altered skin color to consist of four tones (fair, fair/medium, medium/dark and dark) and altered tooth shade value (brightness) to range from 00 (brightest) to 05 (darkest). Two groups of judges (70 dentists, 70 laypeople) completed a questionnaire and rated the images for smile attractiveness.ResultsFor most tooth shade values (00, 01, 03, 04, 05), multiple mixed linear regression showed that variation in skin color influenced respondents’ perceptions of smile attractiveness (P < .001). For images corresponding to tooth shade values 01, 02, 03, 04 and 05, men provided lower ratings than did women (P < .05). Attractiveness ratings increased with the age of participants (P < .05). Dentists rated images higher than did laypeople (P < .05).ConclusionVariation in skin color for most tooth shade values influenced dentists’ and laypeople&apos;s perceived smile attractiveness.Clinical ImplicationsDentists and laypeople did not perceive the brightest tooth shade to be the most attractive, and they did not perceive all skin colors to be equally attractive with bright white teeth. Respondents perceived dark skin with bright white teeth and fair skin with dark teeth as relatively unattractive.     

The quality of information on the Internet on orthodontic retainer wear: a cross-sectional study

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to assess the accessibility, usability, reliability and quality of information on the Internet written for the lay public about orthodontic retainers, and to elucidate the different retention protocols encouraged. Design: A cross-sectional, observational study. Setting: Online, using a computer connected to the Internet in Australia. Methods: Two search terms; ‘orthodontic retainer’ and ‘how long should someone wear a retainer after their braces are removed?’ were entered alternatively into five search engines. Twenty results for each search term per search engine that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were evaluated in terms of accessibility, usability, reliability and quality of information using the LIDA and DISCERN instruments, ensuring there were no internal or cross-search engine duplicates. Any information about frequency and duration of retainer wear was also collected. Results: Two hundred different websites were identified and assessed. The median overall LIDA score was 72%, corresponding to a moderate quality level. The median total DISCERN score was 47%. Twenty-two websites recommended patients adhere to the specific protocol prescribed to them by their practitioner. There were 45 (22.5%) and 28 (14%) websites advising indefinite use of removable and bonded retainers respectively. Conclusions: Information about retainers on the Internet is easily accessible and usable, though the quality of the content is generally of a moderate level. However, the information is not always accurate and reliable. Both full-time and part-time wear of removable retainers was suggested over greatly varying time periods. Indefinite wear of removable and bonded retainers was also advocated.