Investigation of cardiac status and bone mineral density in Turner syndrome

This review highlights recent developments in the detection and management of congenital heart disease and osteoporosis in patients with monosomy X, or Turner syndrome (TS). Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) using gadolinium as a contrast agent demonstrates a higher prevalence and greater diversity of congenital cardiovascular defects than previously recognized in TS. Almost 50% of girls and women with TS have marked tortuosity or ectasia of the aortic arch, suggesting that these individuals may be at greater risk for aneurysm formation or dissection and therefore require closer monitoring. MRA also reveals that major venous anomalies are common in TS, with partial anomalous pulmonary venous return and persistent left superior vena cava each found in about 13% of patients. MR imaging even without contrast is a valuable complement to routine cardiac ultrasound in detecting abnormalities of the aortic valve. Abnormal electrocardiographic findings, including prolongation of the QTc interval, have recently been documented in many individuals with TS. Conduction and repolarization abnormalities have not been associated with congenital anatomic defects and are as common in young girls as adults. The clinical significance of these electrophysiological findings is unknown at present, but attention to the ECG in TS is important, particularly in monitoring the QTc when prescribing drugs associated with QT prolongation.Patients with TS are at high risk for osteoporosis as a result of premature ovarian failure and intrinsic bone abnormalities specific to the syndrome. Low cortical bone mineral density (BMD) is apparent in prepubertal girls, and it remains low in adults, independent of estrogen treatment and other hormonal factors. The low mineralization of cortical bone in TS may be associated with a small increased fracture risk, but no treatments are known to increase cortical bone mineral content in TS. Trabecular BMD is normal in TS women who have received continuous estrogen treatment from their mid-teens, although areal densitometry scores may be misleadingly low in very small patients. However, young women with ovarian failure who have not received estrogen treatment for extended periods of time are at high risk for osteoporosis of trabecular bone of the spine, with associated compression fractures and height loss. Therefore, judicious management of estrogen therapy to prevent osteoporosis while minimizing estrogen-associated adverse events is a challenging aspect of care for girls and women with TS.     

Parathyroid hormone and teriparatide for the treatment of osteoporosis: a review of the evidence and suggested guidelines for its use

All therapies currently recommended for the management of osteoporosis act mainly to inhibit bone resorption and reduce bone remodeling. PTH and its analog, teriparatide [recombinant human PTH(1-34)], represent a new class of anabolic therapies for the treatment of severe osteoporosis, having the potential to improve skeletal microarchitecture. Significant reductions in both vertebral and appendicular fracture rates have been demonstrated in the phase III trial of teriparatide, involving elderly women with at least one prevalent vertebral fracture before the onset of therapy. However, there is as yet no evidence that the antifracture efficacy of PTH will be superior to the bisphosphonates, whereas cost-utility estimates suggest that teriparatide is significantly more expensive. Teriparatide should be considered as treatment for postmenopausal women and men with severe osteoporosis, as well as for patients with established glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis who require long-term steroid treatment. Teriparatide should also be considered for the management of individuals at particularly high risk for fractures, including subjects who are younger than age 65 and who have particularly low bone mineral density measurements (T scores < or = 3.5). Teriparatide therapy is not recommended for more than 2 yr, based, in part, on the induction of osteosarcoma in a rat model of carcinogenicity. Total daily calcium intake from both supplements and dietary sources should be limited to 1500 mg together with adequate vitamin D intake (< or =1000 U/d). Monitoring of serum calcium may be safely limited to measurement after 1 month of treatment; mild hypercalcemia may be treated by withdrawing dietary calcium supplements, reducing the dosing frequency of PTH, or both. At present, concurrent therapy with antiresorptive therapy, particularly bisphosphonates, should be avoided, although sequential therapy with such agents may consolidate the beneficial effects upon the skeleton after PTH is discontinued.     

Pregnancy associated osteoporosis: the familial effect

OBJECTIVE: The etiology and pathogenesis of pregnancy associated osteoporosis is unclear. Whether pregnancy has simply been an aggravating factor or is a direct etiologic cause responsible for severe bone loss needs to be elucidated. METHODS: In order to evaluate the contribution of familial factors to pregnancy osteoporosis, we analyzed the bone mass of 15 relatives of 5 women with pregnancy osteoporosis. Most of the patients suffered from severe back pain associated with vertebral fractures in their first pregnancy. Extensive clinical, laboratory and radiological investigations were performed to exclude secondary causes of osteoporosis. Bone mineral density measurements were performed on 15 first order family members and the results were compared with those of a control group of 20 healthy members of 5 families. RESULTS: Osteoporosis was present in 53% of the relatives of patients with pregnancy osteoporosis and in 15% of the controls (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results highly suggest that some patients with pregnancy associated osteoporosis have a genetic determination of low peak bone mass, and gestation, due to its association with physiological metabolic disturbances, constitutes a risk factor for the development of skeletal fractures in these patients.     

Osteoporosis and Diabetes

Osteoporosis is the most prevalent metabolic bone disease in the United States. Although the disease has historically been reported mostly in white women, it can affect individuals of both sexes and all ethnic groups. The presence of osteoporosis related to diabetes is not well acknowledged and the impact of osteoporosis in a diabetic patient is often not considered. Routine screening or initiation of preventive medications for osteoporosis in all patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes is not recommended at the present time. However, in all patients with diabetes, besides optimal glycemic control, general recommendations regarding adequate dietary calcium intake, regular exercise, and avoidance of other potential risk factors such as smoking should be given. In patients who have positive risk factors for osteoporosis, or in those who present with fractures, evaluation of bone density should be done and respective preventive or therapeutic interventions should be applied.     

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and osteoporosis: A potential association with therapeutic implications

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and osteoporosis are two highly prevalent metabolic diseases. Increasing experimental evidence supports a pathophysiological link between NAFLD and osteoporosis. A key feature could be chronic, low-grade inflammation, which characterizes NAFLD and possibly affects bone metabolism. In this context, several factors, including but not limited to receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand, osteoprotegerin, osteopontin and osteocalcin, may serve as mediators. In the clinical setting, most but not all epidemiological evidence indicates that NAFLD is associated with lower bone mineral density or osteoporosis in adults. Although an association between NAFLD and osteoporosis has not yet been established, and thus remains speculative, pharmacological considerations already exist. Some of the current and emerging pharmacological options for NAFLD have shown possible anti-osteoporotic properties (eg, vitamin E, obeticholic acid, semaglutide), while others (eg, pioglitazone, canagliflozin) have been associated with increased risk of fractures and may be avoided in patients with NAFLD and concomitant osteoporosis, especially those at high fracture risk. Conversely, some anti-osteoporotic medications (denosumab) might benefit NAFLD, while others (raloxifene) might adversely affect it and, consequently, may be avoided in patients with osteoporosis and NAFLD. If an association between NAFLD and osteoporosis is established, a medication that could target both diseases would be a great advancement. This review summarizes the main experimental and clinical evidence on the potential association between NAFLD and osteoporosis and focuses on treatment considerations derived from this potential association.     

Osteoporosis as an Hereditary Disease

Osteoporosis is a common disease with a strong genetic component characterized by reduced bone mass and increased risk of fragility fractures. Twin and family studies have shown that bone mineral density (BMD) and other determinants of fracture risk such as ultrasound properties of bone, skeletal geometry, and bone turnover have a significant heritable component. Osteoporotic fractures also have a genetic component but heritability reduces dramatically with increasing age. Many different genetic variants contribute to the regulation of these phenotypes; most are common variants of small effect size, but there is evidence that rare variants of large effect size also contribute in some individuals. Genome wide association studies have recently been successfully employed to identifying genes that predispose to osteoporosis, although some of these had already been identified through the study of rare bone diseases. Although there has been extensive progress in understanding the genetic basis of osteoporosis over the past 10 years, most of the genetic variants that regulate bone mass remained to be discovered.     

Drug insight: Existing and emerging therapies for osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a major public health problem that is characterized by microarchitectural deterioration, low bone mass, and increased risk of fractures. Currently, many women and men affected with this disease are not diagnosed or treated. As osteoporosis is often clinically silent, risk-factor assessment and measurement of BMD are needed to identify those who may benefit from osteoporosis therapy. Although adequate daily intake of calcium and vitamin D, and regular weight-bearing exercise are important for skeletal health, they are not adequate treatments for individuals with osteoporosis. Therapies approved for treatment and/or prevention of osteoporosis in the United States include oral bisphosphonates (alendronate, ibandronate and risedronate), calcitonin, estrogens, teriparatide (parathyroid hormone fragment [1-34]), and raloxifene. For most patients, oral bisphosphonates are the treatment of choice, given the large-scale randomized-trial data demonstrating efficacy in fracture reduction, although bisphosphonates that reduce spine and nonspine fractures (e.g. alendronate and risedronate) are preferred. For high-risk patients (those with very low bone density, or with fractures), teriparatide therapy for 2 years should be considered. The treatment paradigm for osteoporosis will evolve further as promising new treatments progress through clinical development.     

Skeletal morbidity in inflammatory bowel disease

Patients with Crohn's disease are at increased risk of developing disturbances in bone and mineral metabolism because of several factors, including the cytokine-mediated nature of the inflammatory bowel disease, the intestinal malabsorption resulting from disease activity or from extensive intestinal resection and the use of glucucorticoids to control disease activity. Inability to achieve peak bone mass when the disease starts in childhood, malnutrition, immobilization, low BMI, smoking and hypogonadism may also play a contributing role in the pathogenesis of bone loss. The relationship between long-term use of glucocorticoids for any disease indication and increased risk for osteoporosis and fractures is well established. However, the relationship between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis and bone loss remains controversial. Depending on the population studied the prevalence of osteoporosis has thus been variably reported to range from 12 to 42% in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In IBD most studies demonstrate a negative correlation between bone mineral density (BMD) and glucocorticoid use, but not all authors agree on the relationship between long-term glucocorticoid use and continuing bone loss. Whereas prospective studies do suggest sustained bone loss at both trabecular and cortical sites in long-term glucocorticoid users with inflammatory bowel disease, a decrease in bone mass is also observed in patients with active Crohn's disease not using glucocorticoids, and bone loss is not universally observed in patients with Crohn's disease using orally or rectally administered glucocorticoids. Data on vertebral fractures are scarce and there is no agreement about the risk of non-vertebral fractures in patients with Crohn's disease, although it has been suggested that non-vertebral fracture risk may be increased by up to 60% in patients with IBD. A recent publication reports an increased risk of hip fractures in Crohn's disease related to current and cumulative corticosteroid use and use of opiates, although these fractures could not be related to the severity of osteoporosis. The issue of the magnitude of the problem of osteoporosis has become particularly relevant in Crohn's disease, since the ability of therapeutic interventions to beneficially influence skeletal morbidity has been clearly established in patients with osteoporosis, whether post-menopausal women, men or glucocorticoid users. The main question that arises is whether all patients with Crohn's disease should be treated with bone protective agents on the assumption that they all have the potential to develop osteoporosis or whether the use of these agents should be restricted to patients clearly at risk of osteoporosis and fractures, providing these can be identified. We recommend, based on the available literature and our own experience, that all patients with Crohn's disease should be screened for osteoporosis by means of a bone mineral density measurement in addition to full correction of any potential calcium and vitamin D deficiency, to allow timely therapeutic intervention of the patient at risk while sparing the vast majority unnecessary medical treatment.     

Metabolic bone disease among in-patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Twenty-five consecutive in-patients who had suffered from rheumatoid arthritis for at least five years were investigated radiologically, histologically and biochemically for evidence of metabolic bone disease. Dietary intake of vitamin D was universally well below recommended levels. Serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25-OHD) concentrations did not correlate with dietary intake of vitamin D but correlated significantly with a sunlight exposure score (p less than 0.01). Despite seven patients having 25-OHD levels below the normal reference range, no cases of osteomalacia were found. Pathological fractures, often initially unrecognized, had occurred in the lower limb bones of seven patients in the previous five years. Those with fractures of the leg bones had evidence of more pronounced osteoporosis of the axial skeleton radiologically and histologically and five of the seven had been taking oral corticosteroids. There was close agreement between qualitative histological assessment of osteoporosis and radiographic evidence of vertebral collapse and those with the severest osteoporosis had lower serum levels of 25-OHD than the rest (p less than 0.02). Ten subjects had reduced xylose absorption tests, although frank malabsorption was not found, and in five patients studied the jejunal mucosa was normal.     

Calcitonin.

Calcitonin is FDA approved for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis but not for prevention. The preferred delivery system is nasal. Nasal calcitonin is safe and well tolerated. The vertebral fracture efficacy of calcitonin is less robust than the two approved bisphosphonates (alendronate and risedronate) but is similar to raloxifene in the treatment of established osteoporosis. Calcitonin has not been demonstrated to reduce hip fracture risk, although a post-hoc pooled analysis suggests potential effectiveness of nasal calcitonin. Calcitonin produces small increments in bone mass of the spine and modestly reduces bone turnover in women with osteoporosis. Calcitonin may have analgesic benefit in patients with acute painful vertebral fractures. Treatment with calcitonin should be considered for older women with osteoporosis with painful vertebral fractures and for women who fail to respond to or cannot tolerate bisphosphonates. Calcitonin may also be indicated for women who are unable to take bisphosphonates because of impaired renal function.     

Clinical, biochemical, and histological studies of osteomalacia, osteoporosis, and parathyroid function in chronic liver disease.

Twenty of 32 patients with either chronic cholestatic or hepatocellular liver disease had bone pain or recent fractures. On bone biopsy five patients had normal bone, 15 had osteomalacia, five had osteoporosis, and seven had a combination of osteomalacia and osteoporosis. In the presence of osteoporosis, osteomalacia was minimal or absent. There was no biochemical, radiological, or histological evidence of excess parathyroid activity. No significant correlations were demonstrated between the plasma and urinary biochemical findings and the presence of either osteoporosis or osteomalacia and bone biopsy was essential for correct diagnosis. There was no statistical relationship between low serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D values and the presence of osteomalacia. Bone disease was not prevented by regular intramuscular vitamin D2, although biochemical changes were improved. Drugs such as corticosteroids and cholestyramine may be important aetiological factors in hepatic osteodystrophy.     

Osteoporosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to examine the state of knowledge and clinical practice in the association of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to osteoporosis and fracture incidence. RECENT FINDINGS: There is a clear association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and excessive bone loss/risk of fractures. Little is known about the pathophysiological processes involved in the bone loss, but recent reports point to a continuous systemic inflammatory state in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This inflammation involves the release of inflammatory cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1. During the course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a protein catabolic process takes place, including increased production of catalytic enzymes (matrix metalloproteinases etc.), which together with the inflammatory cytokines induces bone resorption. SUMMARY: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are at increased risk of osteoporosis and fractures. Risk factors such as smoking, advanced age, physical inactivity, malnutrition, and low weight may be responsible, but a number of pathophysiological explanations including the presence of a chronic inflammatory state with increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines and protein catalytic enzymes may also be involved. The use of oral glucocorticoids is also a significant risk factor. Increased awareness is highly warranted to diagnose osteoporosis at an early stage, and professionals should be aware of the risk of osteoporosis in this patient population.     

Mechanisms of impaired bone strength in type 1 and 2 diabetes

Diabetes and osteoporosis are common and complex disorders with an enormous health burden that can be often associated especially in middle-age and elderly individuals. Although there is raising awareness of the higher fractures rates among patients with type 1 (DM1) and 2 (DM2) diabetes, there are few data available on the pathogenetic mechanisms responsible for this increased risk. Importantly, several experimental and clinical observations suggest that bone abnormalities associated with diabetes may differ, at least in part, from those associated with senile or post-menopausal osteoporosis. This implies that specific preventive and therapeutic strategies have to be developed and tested to prevent fractures in DM1 and DM2 patients. It is also likely that shared (i.e. due to glucose-toxicity) as well as different (i.e. due to insulin levels or other hormones) mechanisms may be associated with bone fragility in DM1 and DM2. Moreover, the hypothesis of an endocrine role of the skeleton in the regulation of glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity has been recently proposed by experimental observations. This review summarizes the recent clinical and experimental advances on glucose tolerance, bone fragility and osteoporosis associated with diabetes.     

Pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis for people over 70

Osteoporosis has been defined as "a systemic disease characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue, with consequent increase in bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture". The impact of osteoporosis is most pronounced in elderly populations who run the greatest risk of fractures. The probability of developing mainly hip, vertebral and other non-vertebral fractures (for example, a Colles fracture) not only depends on bone mineral density (BMD) but also on age. Older patients are more susceptible to fracture than younger patients with the same BMD T-score. As the older population increases, the incidence of osteoporotic fractures is expected to rise dramatically over the next few decades. Although hip fractures are considered to be the most severe and economically important osteoporotic fracture, vertebral fractures also lead to adverse health outcomes, including back pain, height loss and kyphosis. These changes may result in significant declines in physical performance, function and, ultimately, loss of independence. The challenge for physicians is to prevent bone loss, to diagnose and treat osteoporosis before fractures occur, and to treat patients who have already experienced a fracture to prevent recurrent fractures. The objective of this review is to analyze the capacity to reduce fractures as the key element to evaluate the effectiveness of available medications: calcium and Vitamin D, bone formation drugs, antiresortive drugs, and dual-effect drugs. In view of the paucity of information about treatment of osteoporosis in the elderly population, available studies were not designed with this objective, so that this article reviews data mostly deriving from post-hoc analysis or sub-analysis of the main phase III clinical trials of each of the tested medications.     

Anabolic Agents for Osteoporosis

Antiresorptive agents for osteoporosis are a cornerstone of therapy, but anabolic drugs have recently widened our therapeutic options. By directly stimulating bone formation, anabolic agents reduce fracture incidence by improving other bone qualities in addition to increasing bone mass. Teriparatide (human parathyroid hormone[1-34]) has clearly emerged as a major approach for selected patients with osteoporosis. Teriparatide increases bone mineral density and bone turnover, improves bone microarchitecture, and changes bone size. The incidence of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures is reduced. Teriparatide is approved in many countries throughout the world for the treatment of both postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis who are at high risk for fracture. Another anabolic agent, strontium ranelate, may both promote bone formation and inhibit bone resorption. Clinical trials support the use of strontium ranelate as a treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis and have shown that strontium ranelate reduces the frequency of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. Other potential anabolic therapies for osteoporosis, including other forms of parathyroid hormone, growth hormone, and insulin-like growth factor-I, have been examined, although less data are currently available on these approaches.     

Risedronate: a clinical review

BACKGROUND: Risedronate sodium has recently been approved for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal and corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. METHODS: Studies of risedronate were obtained from the MEDLINE database (1966 to the present) of references using risedronate, risedronic acid, osteoporosis, and human subject as keywords. Additional references were sought from the reference lists of the articles obtained. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials and 7 other clinical trials were obtained. In postmenopausal women with normal bone density, risedronate increases lumbar spine bone density and preserves femoral neck density. In postmenopausal women with prior vertebral fracture, risedronate decreases new vertebral and nonvertebral fracture incidence. In patients who experienced breast cancer and who have chemotherapy-induced menopause, risedronate preserves bone. Risedronate prevents vertebral bone loss in patients beginning long-term corticosteroid therapy. Risedronate decreases pagetic bone pain and induces radiological improvement in pagetic lesions. Risedronate induces normalization of biochemical abnormalities and may be more effective than etidronate disodium for Paget disease. Only one study, a trial in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis using a low dose (2.5 mg) of risedronate, did not have a positive result. Adverse effects in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis, breast cancer, and Paget disease and in those taking corticosteroids are similar to those of patients taking placebo, and do not include notable upper gastrointestinal tract adverse event rates or serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Risedronate prevents postmenopausal bone loss, decreases fracture in those with established postmenopausal osteoporosis, effectively treats Paget disease, and prevents corticosteroid-induced bone loss. Long-term toxic effects and efficacy, particularly fracture end point data, are unknown. Also undefined are optimal duration of therapy, potential for use in combination with other agents, and direct comparison with other bisphosphonates used for osteoporosis.     

Selection of individuals for prevention of fractures due to bone fragility.

Most patients with fractures go untreated because of the lack of awareness of osteoporosis. Treatment is indicated for women and men with osteoporosis and women and men with fractures with either osteoporosis or osteopenia because (a) fractures increase morbidity and mortality, (b) the burden of fractures is increasing because longevity is increasing, and (c) bone loss accelerates, rather than decelerates in old age. The indication for drug therapy is less clear in women or men with osteopenia because drugs have not been proved to reduce fracture risk in this group. There is no evidence that treating individuals with only risk factors reduces the fracture rate. Screening has not been shown to reduce the burden of fractures. Altering the bone mineral density by a few percent in the population is likely to reduce the number of fractures, but how this can be achieved is unknown. The rigorously investigated drugs reducing the spine fracture rate are alendronate, raloxifene and risedronate. Calcium and vitamin D reduce hip fractures in nursing home residents but not community-dwellers. In the community, only alendronate and risedronate have been reported to reduce hip fractures in randomized trials. The evidence for hormone replacement therapy is less satisfactory. It is likely to reduce the number of spinal fractures, but its role in hip fracture prevention is uncertain. Only alendronate has been reported to reduce spine fractures in men with osteoporosis. Evidence for the use of other drugs (calcitonin, fluoride, anabolic steroids and active vitamin D metabolites) in women or men is insufficient to justify their use.     

Role of bisphosphonates and calcitonin in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates have been shown to increase bone mineral density in patients with established osteoporosis as well as those with osteopenia. The evidence conclusively shows a reduction in fracture rates in patients on the more potent nitrogen containing bisphosphonates. Indeed, significant vertebral fracture rate reduction has been demonstrated after only 1 year of therapy. Alendronate, a second-generation bisphosphonate, and risedronate, a third-generation bisphosphonate, are first line medications for the treatment of osteoporosis given their efficacy in preventing both vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. There is evidence that vertebral fractures may be prevented by intermittent cyclic therapy with etidronate. All three have been shown to increase bone mineral density in the spine, with alendronate and risedronate producing significant increases in hip bone density. Calcitonin has demonstrated the ability to reduce vertebral fracture rates with minimal changes in bone density. Calcitonin is also beneficial in reducing the bone pain associated with fractures.     

Study of osteoporosis awareness, investigation and treatment of patients discharged from a tertiary public teaching hospital

Background: Patients with fragility fractures secondary to osteoporosis are at risk of recurrent fracture. Osteoporosis is often underrecognized and undertreated. We looked at the levels of awareness, investigation and treatment of patients with fracture. Methods: The study group included patients admitted to a tertiary teaching hospital. Postal surveys were sent to female patients over 60 years of age who had been identified in the hospital database as having International Classification of Diseases‐10 codes for fracture and discharged between June 1997 and January 2002. The questionnaire had specific questions on the histories of the fractures, the risk factors, the awareness of osteoporosis, bone mineral density testing and the treatment for osteoporosis. Results: Of 1584 surveys posted, 366 valid questionnaires were returned. The median age of respondents was 81 years with a range of 60–99 years. Fifty‐nine per cent reported one fracture, 41% two or more fractures and 65% reported a hip fracture. Forty‐eight per cent of patients were aware that they had osteoporosis and 35% reported having a bone density performed. Thirty‐seven per cent reported being on treatment for osteoporosis on discharge, with the majority being on treatment with calcium (34%). Conclusion: This postal survey of a high‐risk patient group discharged from a tertiary hospital confirm the findings from other population‐based and hospital‐based studies that a significant proportion of patients at risk of further fracture are not investigated or offered specific treatment for osteoporosis. Lack of awareness of underlying osteoporosis by both treating clinicians and patients is likely to be a major contributing factor.     

Decreased fibrinolytic potential in patients with idiopathic avascular necrosis and transient osteoporosis of the hip

A thrombotic etiology has been suggested as the cause of idiopathic avascular necrosis of the hip, although the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are unknown. Transient osteoporosis of the hip has also been suggested to represent bone marrow edema that may be related to ischemia. We evaluated four patients with idiopathic avascular necrosis and one patient with transient osteoporosis of the hip for thrombotic potential placing a special emphasis on the fibrinolytic system. All five patients had identifiable abnormalities of fibrinolysis. Four patients had elevated levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) and one patient had an inadequate increase in tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) post venous occlusion. Serum triglycerides were increased in three of the patients. These findings suggest an association between decreased fibrinolytic potential and the subsequent development of avascular necrosis and transient osteoporosis of the hip. These patients should have an evaluation of the fibrinolytic system with tPA and PAI-1 levels as well as a lipid profile. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.