Credentialing in radiology: Current practice and future challenges

Radiology has changed significantly in recent years. The volume of work has increased dramatically as has its complexity. Future radiologists need an adequate training and expertise in conventional practice as well as new techniques. This comes at a time when other stakeholders outside of radiology are voicing their own concerns. The rightly justified increasing focus on patient safety has placed even more emphasis on the demonstration of competent practice by all health care professionals. Credentialing has been put forward as a way to ensure a doctor is competent in specific areas. Credentialing may be an alien concept to many radiology trainees but moves are afoot in the United Kingdom to bring it to the forefront of its postgraduate medical training. Credentialing began in 20^th century North America where it was linked to the process of privileging. It subsequently garnered a strong patient safety focus and has become a part of the international healthcare agenda. Not everyone agrees with credentialing, it has many criticisms including the risk of speciality “turf wars” and the stifling of medical excellence to name just a couple. Is credentialing in radiology here to stay or will it pass by quietly? This paper reviews the global credentialing movement and discusses how this may impact on future radiology training, using the United Kingdom as its case example.     

A snapshot of patients' awareness of radiation dose and risks associated with medical imaging examinations at an Australian radiology clinic

BackgroundCumulative radiation exposure is linked to increasing the lifetime attributable risk of cancer. To avoid unnecessary radiation exposure and facilitate shared decision making, patients should be aware of these issues. This paper examines patients' awareness of radiation dose and risks associated with medical imaging examinations.MethodsConsecutive patients attending a private radiology clinic over a nine week period in 2014 in Metropolitan Melbourne were surveyed while waiting to undergo an imaging examination. Patients who were under 18 years of age, did not speak English and/or were referred for interventional imaging procedures were excluded from participation. Survey questions addressed patients' awareness of radiation dose associated with various imaging modalities' and patients' experience and preferences regarding communication of information about radiation. Data was analysed using SPSS (Ver 20.1).ResultsA total of 242 surveys were completed. Most participants were male (143/239, 59.8%) and aged between 33 and 52 years (109/242, 45%). Over half of participants were not concerned about radiation from medical imaging (130/238, 54.6%). Only a third of participants (80/234, 34.2%) correctly reported that CT has a higher radiation dose than X-ray. Very few participants correctly identified mammography, DEXA, PET and PET/CT as radiation emitting examinations. The majority of participants (202/236, 85.6%) indicated that they were not informed about radiation dose and risks by their referring doctor in advance.ConclusionThis paper provides information relevant to a single private radiology clinic in Australia. Nevertheless, our results have shown that patients presenting for medical imaging have little awareness of radiation dose and risks associated with these examinations and received little information by their referring physicians or staff at the radiology clinic.     

The role of morbidity and mortality meetings in interventional radiology

Purpose

To understand the current practice of interventional radiology (IR) morbidity and mortality (M&;M) meetings among interventional radiologists in Europe, and to develop a set of results-based recommendations to increase the prevalence of IR M&;M meetings.

Materials and methods

Online electronic surveys were sent to members of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe (CIRSE). Each survey consisted of 18 questions pertaining to IR M&;M meetings.

Results

A total of 150 CIRSE members responded to the survey. Approximately 47% of respondents held IR M&;M meetings in their departments. Among those who held IR M&;M meetings, 42% held them monthly and 68% rated the quality of the meetings as good or excellent. Of those who did not have M&;M meetings, 94% were interested in incorporating M&;M meetings into their future practice. The most common reasons for not holding IR M&;M meetings were lack of time (68%) and small IR practice groups (43%). A total of 85% were interested in learning more about IR M&;M meetings. The preferred method of education about M&;M meetings included annual radiology meetings (44%), peer-reviewed articles in radiology journals (31%), websites (26%), and newsletters (15%).

Conclusions

The data demonstrate that although current practice of M&;M meetings in European IR departments is limited, the majority of respondents believe that M&;M meetings are beneficial to their practice. There is a need for guidelines or standards of practice to incorporate such meetings in IR departments to prevent medical errors, which may ultimately lead to enhanced patient safety and outcomes.     

Analysis of radiology education in undergraduate medical doctors training in Europe

Objectives

The purpose of the present study is to describe how undergraduate radiology teaching is organized in Europe and to identify important characteristics of undergraduate radiology curriculum.

Methods

An electronic survey on undergraduate teaching was distributed by the European Society of Radiology (ESR) to 38 national delegates of the ESR Education Committee.

Results

The “classic type” of radiology teaching method is more frequent than the “modular type”. In 38% of medical training centres the first experience with radiology is in pre-clinical years. The students enrolled in the fourth medical year experience the largest involvement in radiology education. The total number of teaching hours (mean 89 h, median 76 h) varies across the countries and differs depending on the radiological topic (mean across all topics 14.8 h, median 13). Written tests and oral exams were the most frequently used examination modes. Clerkships are reported as a key part of training.

Conclusion

This first international comparative study of undergraduate radiological curriculum in Europe identifies a large number of differences in curriculum content and teaching methods throughout Europe. More research is needed to establish the radiological educational competences resulting from these differing curricula's to improve and to standardize the teaching according to (inter)national and institutional needs.     

Evaluation of use of e-Learning in undergraduate radiology education: A review

PurposeThe aim of this review is to investigate the evaluative outcomes present in the literature according to Kirkpatrick's learning model and to examine the nature and characteristics of the e-Learning interventions in radiology education at undergraduate level.Materials and methodsFour databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Eric) are searched for publications related to the application of e-Learning in undergraduate radiology education. The search strategy is a combination of e-Learning and Mesh and non Mesh radiology and undergraduate related terms. These search strategies are established in relation to experts of respective domains. The full text of thirty pertinent articles is reviewed. Author's country and study location data is extracted to identify the most active regions and year's are extracted to know the existing trend. Data regarding radiology subfields and undergraduate year of radiology education is extracted along with e-Learning technologies to identify the most prevalent or suitable technologies or tools with respect to radiology contents. Kirkpatricks learning evaluation model is used to categorize the evaluative outcomes reported in the identified studies.ResultsThe results of this analysis reveal emergence of highly interactive games, audience response systems and designing of wide range of customized tools according to learner needs assessment in radiology education at undergraduate level. All these initiatives are leading toward highly interactive self directed learning environments to support the idea of life-long independent learners. Moreover, majority of the studies in literature regarding e-Learning in radiology at undergraduate level are based on participant satisfaction followed by participant results or outcomes either before or after an intervention or both. There was no research particularly demonstrating performance change in clinical practice or patient outcome as they may be difficult to measure in medical education. Thus clinical competences and performances are highly affected by pretentious learning environments.     

Undergraduate radiology education in the era of dynamism in medical curriculum: An educational perspective

Radiology undergraduate curriculum has undergone a tremendous transformation in the decades reflecting a change in the structure, content and delivery of instruction. These changes are not unique to the discipline, but rather a response in the cycle of the re-engineering process in the medical curriculum in order to ensure its proper role into the ever-changing context. Radiology education is now more integrated across the curriculum than ever. The diversity of how radiology is being taught within the medical undergraduate curriculum is extensive and promising with the expanding role of the radiologist in the spectrum within the medical curriculum. A strong interface between the medical student and the clinicians must always be integrated in the learning process in order to convey the essential and practical use of the different aspects of radiology essential to the student's career as a future clinician. With the recent advancement in educational and technological innovations, radiology education is mobilized in the most pioneering ways, stimulating a rekindled interest in the field of medical imaging. This paper describes the increasing interest in current role of undergraduate radiology education in the context of constant medical curriculum innovations and in the digital age.     

Patient safety in medical imaging: A joint paper of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS)

The fundamental professional roles of radiographers and radiologists are focused on providing benefit to patients with our skills, while maintaining their safety at all times. There are numerous patient safety issues in radiology which must be considered. These encompass: protection from direct harm arising from the techniques and technologies we use; ensuring physical and psychological well-being of patients while under our care; maintaining the highest possible quality of service provision; and protecting the staff to ensure they can deliver safe services. This paper summarises the key categories of safety issues in the provision of radiology services, from the joint perspectives of radiographers and radiologists, and provides references for further reading in all major relevant areas. This is a joint statement of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS), published simultaneously in Insights into Imaging [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0721-y] and Radiography [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.01.009].     

Gaucher disease in children: radiology of non-central nervous system manifestations

The radiological findings in paediatric Gaucher disease (GD) are reviewed and future challenges for radiology are discussed. This overview is based on a literature review and our experience of children with GD in one of two national institutions for paediatric GD in the UK. GD is known to progress more rapidly in childhood. Current imaging is mainly suitable for ascertaining the complications of GD. The UK recommendations for routine radiological surveillance are discussed. With enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), which dramatically modifies the course of the disorder, the challenge for radiology in the future is likely to be assessing treatment efficacy rather than the detection of disease complications. Disease manifestations are likely to change in those on ERT and the most notable recent alteration in the disease profile in childhood is the virtual disappearance of the acute bone crisis in this population.     

The impact of contracts on outsourcing computed tomography examinations from a Swedish public university hospital to a private radiology unit

IntroductionAfter years of outsourcing without detailed contracts from one of Sweden's largest university hospitals to external radiology units, the hospital started to use a specific contract for outsourcing computed tomography (CT) examinations. The purpose of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of two outsourcing approaches, where examinations were performed either with a detailed, specific contract (with-contract) or without (no-contract), between a hospital radiology department and private external units.MethodsThis retrospective study included a group of electively outsourced CT-examinations (n = 132) and a control group of in-house CT-examinations (n = 132), selected from the three different types of CT-examinations referred from the Departments of Oncology and Hematology.These examinations were randomly selected from four different groups over two time periods of one year each, one being outsourcing without a contract (no-contract, during 2013), one time period with a specific contract (with-contract, during 2014) and two control groups of examinations performed in-house within both these time periods. We compared outsourced examinations (both no-contract and with-contract groups) and in-house examinations. The comparison of these groups include five parameters; management-time, patient waiting-time, the quality of the examinations, - image interpretations and costs.ResultsDuring 2013, management-time for CT-examinations was longer in the outsourced group (no-contract) than in the in-house group, with a statistical significance (P = 0.002). Fewer examinations performed in-house and in the with-contract group needed re-interpretation than in the no-contract group. CT-examinations in the with-contract group were associated with shorter overall management-time, patient waiting time and lower costs compared to the no-contract group.ConclusionUsing a contract with detailed specifications for outsourcing CT-examinations may be an effective way of reducing patient waiting time. Outsourcing based on a well-founded contract can be cost-effective, compared with outsourcing without a detailed plan for the services required.     

The quality and impact of computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) in radiology case-based learning

Objective

The aim of this research was to explore (1) clinical years students’ perceptions about radiology case-based learning within a computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) setting, (2) an analysis of the collaborative learning process, and (3) the learning impact of collaborative work on the radiology cases.

Methods

The first part of this study focuses on a more detailed analysis of a survey study about CSCL based case-based learning, set up in the context of a broader radiology curriculum innovation. The second part centers on a qualitative and quantitative analysis of 52 online collaborative learning discussions from 5th year and nearly graduating medical students. The collaborative work was based on 26 radiology cases regarding musculoskeletal radiology.

Results

The analysis of perceptions about collaborative learning on radiology cases reflects a rather neutral attitude that also does not differ significantly in students of different grade levels. Less advanced students are more positive about CSCL as compared to last year students. Outcome evaluation shows a significantly higher level of accuracy in identification of radiology key structures and in radiology diagnosis as well as in linking the radiological signs with available clinical information in nearly graduated students. No significant differences between different grade levels were found in accuracy of using medical terminology.

Conclusion

Students appreciate computer supported collaborative learning settings when tackling radiology case-based learning. Scripted computer supported collaborative learning groups proved to be useful for both 5th and 7th year students in view of developing components of their radiology diagnostic approaches.     

介入放射在输卵管妊娠并腹腔内出血治疗中的应用

目的：研究经动脉途径化疗及血管栓塞治疗输卵管妊娠并腹腔内出血的可行性。方法：采用Ｓｅｌｄｉｎｇｅｒ技术,对２５例输卵管妊娠并腹腔内出血患者,进行超选择性子宫动脉插管,经导管向子宫动脉内灌注甲氨喋呤（ＭＴＸ）后行动脉栓塞,制止内出血。术后监测血β－ＨＣＧ水平变化,Ｂ超监测盆腔包块变化,综合评价疗效。结果：输卵管妊娠在血管造影下大致显示Ⅰ、Ⅱ型２种血管征象。Ⅰ型为宫旁可见片状异常血管染色,Ⅱ型为宫旁圆     

Awareness of radiation protection and dose levels of imaging procedures among medical students,radiography students,and radiology residents at an academic hospital: Results of a comprehensive survey

PurposeTo evaluate the awareness of radiation protection issues and the knowledge of dose levels of imaging procedures among medical students, radiology residents, and radiography students at an academic hospital.Material and methodsA total of 159 young doctors and students (including 60 radiology residents, 56 medical students, and 43 radiography students) were issued a questionnaire consisting of 16 multiple choice questions divided into three separated sections (i.e., demographic data, awareness about radiation protection issues, and knowledge about radiation dose levels of common radiological examinations).ResultsMedical students claimed to have at least a good knowledge of radiation protection issues more frequently than radiology residents and radiography students (94.4% vs 55% and 35.7%, respectively; P < 0.05), with no cases of perceived excellent knowledge among radiography students. However, the actual knowledge of essential radiation protection topics such as regulations, patient and tissue susceptibility to radiation damage, professional radiation risk and dose optimisation, as well as of radiation doses delivered by common radiological procedures was significantly worse among medical students than radiology residents and radiography students (P < 0.05). Those latter significantly outperformed radiology residents as to knowledge of radiation protection issues (P < 0.01). Overall, less than 50% of survey respondents correctly answered all questions of the survey.ConclusionsRadiology residents, radiography students and medical students have a limited awareness about radiation protection, with a specific gap of knowledge concerning real radiation doses of daily radiological examinations. Both undergraduate and postgraduate teaching needs to be effectively implemented with radiation safety courses.     

The use of patient-centered outcome measures in radiology: a systematic review

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To undertake a systematic review of literature on patient centred outcomes and explore the use of patient defined outcomes in radiology research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: i) Data sources: Published empirical studies in peer reviewed journals. ii) Study selection: Systematic search of English language radiology literature between 1990-2003, using four electronic databases, and reference lists of papers. Work relating to diagnostic or interventional imaging was included. Screening was excluded, together with articles based solely on the audit of patients' medical records. Patients needed to have inputted directly into the study, for example responding to questionnaires or participating in interviews. iii) Data extraction: Abstracts were retrieved and relevant full text articles obtained. Each paper was reviewed independently by two reviewers (research team members) using a data extraction form, developed by the authors. Categorisation of papers was undertaken at team meetings. RESULTS: A total of 26 publications met the inclusion criteria for the review. Papers were placed within three categories: i) the primary aim of the study was investigate patient centred outcomes (n = 10); ii) the primary aim of the study was to describe the radiological procedure itself but patient contact was made post-procedure (n = 5) and iii) the primary aim of the study was to investigate patients' experiences during procedures (n = 11). Validated outcome measures were used in 10 studies. None of the outcome measures used were developed specifically for radiology. No papers were found where researchers had used patient defined outcomes. CONCLUSION: The research highlighted difficulties relating to the review and reporting of outcomes research. The results indicated little patient engagement in outcome research in radiology.     

加强放射诊断辐射剂量管理的必要性及应对策略

近年来, 我国放射诊断检查特别是CT检查的频次迅猛增加, 已经成为国民人均辐射剂量的最大人工辐射来源, 并有可能超过天然辐射源的贡献。临床诊疗活动中, 患者和受检者短时间内可能进行多项目、多频次的放射诊断成像, 所接受的累积辐射剂量较高, 甚至一天检查的剂量贡献超过50或100 mSv, 从而对其健康产生潜在风险。因此, 有必要对放射诊断辐射剂量信息进行统计分析与控制管理, 以尽可能降低过高剂量及其辐射危险的发生概率。本文对放射诊断辐射风险的国际认识、我国放射诊断设备和检查频次、放射诊断辐射剂量及其管理现状进行阐述, 并就辐射剂量的管理提出应对策略, 为进一步推进临床实践中的辐射防护提供参考。