Emerging causes of iron deficiency anemia refractory to oral iron supplementation

While oral iron supplementation is commonly used throughout many clinical setting,treatment with intravenous(IV) iron has historically been reserved for specific settings,such as chronic kidney disease,gynecologic issues,and anemia associated with cancer and its treatments.However,the use of IV iron has begun to gain popularity in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia(IDA) associated with two conditions that are being seen more frequently than in years past:patients who are status post gastric bypass procedure and those with inflammatory bowel disease(IBD).The Roux-en-Y procedure involves connecting a gastric pouch to the jejunum,creating a blind loop consisting of distal stomach,duodenum,and proximal jejunum that connects to the Roux limb to form a common tract.IDA occurs in 6%-50% of patients who have undergone a gastric bypass,the etiology being multifactorial.The proximal gastric pouch,the primary site of gastric acid secretion,is bypassed,resulting in a decreased ability to metabolize molecular iron.Once metabolized,most iron is absorbed in the duodenum,which is entirely bypassed.After undergoing bypass procedures,most patients significantly limit their intake of red meat,another factor contributing to post-bypass IDA.Chronic anemia occurs in approximately 1/3 of patients who suffer from IBD,and almost half of all IBD patients are iron deficient.IBD leads to IDA through multiple mechanisms,including chronic intestinal blood loss,decreased absorption capabilities of the duodenum secondary to inflammation,and an inability of many IBD patients to tolerate the side effects of oral ferrous sulfate.In this study,we reviewed the charts of all patients who received IV iron at Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center/University of Miami Hospital Clinic from January 2007 to May 2012.The most common indications for IV iron were for issues related to cancer and its treatment(21.9%),IBD(20.1%),and gastric bypass(15.0%).Of the 262 patients who received IV iron,230 received iron sucrose and 36 received iron dextran.While doses of 100,200,300,and 400 mg of iron sucrose were given,100 and 200 mg were by far the most common dosages used,122 and 120 times,respectively.The number of dosages of iron sucrose given ranged from 1 to 46,with a mean of 5.5 and a median of 4 doses.The average dose of iron dextran given was 870.5 mg,with 1000 mg being the most common dosage used.Most patients(22 of 36) who received iron dextran only received one dose.While patients with traditional indications for IV iron,such as gynecologic issues and kidney disease,still were represented in this study,we expect to see a continued increase in physicians using IV iron for emerging gastrointestinal indications,especially considering the increased safety of new low-molecular formulations.     

State of the iron: How to diagnose and efficiently treat iron deficiency anemia in inflammatory bowel disease

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) frequently occurs in patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and negatively impacts their quality of life. Nevertheless, the condition appears to be both under-diagnosed and undertreated. Regular biochemical screening of patients with IBD for anemia by the gastroenterology community has to be advocated.Oral iron is a low cost treatment however its effectiveness is limited by low bioavailability and poor tolerability. Intravenous (IV) iron rapidly replenishes iron stores and has demonstrated its safe use in a number of studies in various therapeutic areas. A broad spectrum of new IV iron formulations is now becoming available offering improved tolerability and patient convenience by rapidly restoring the depleted iron status of patients with IBD. The following article aims to review the magnitude of the problem of IDA in IBD, suggest screening standards and highlight existing and future therapies.     

Prevalence of iron deficiency anemia and iron deficiency in a pediatric population with inflammatory bowel disease

Objectives: Iron deficiency is the most common cause of anemia in children with inflammatory bowel disease, although the real prevalence is unknown. Intravenous iron is suggested as the first line treatment. This study aims to determine the prevalence of iron deficiency anemia in children with inflammatory bowel disease followed in a Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit of a tertiary center and to evaluate this unit's experience with intravenous iron.

Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study was designed involving children with inflammatory bowel disease followed in that unit between January 2001 and April 2016. Laboratory results were collected at the moment of diagnosis, after one-year follow-up and prior each IV iron administration performed during the study period. Anemia was defined according to World Health Organization criteria and the iron deficiency was defined using recent guidelines.

Results: Were studied 69 patients 71% had CD and 29% UC. 50.7% were female. Mean patient age at diagnosis was 13.3 years (range 1--17 years). Prevalence of ID and IDA at diagnosis was 76.8% and 43.5%, respectively. After one year follow-up, those values decreased to 68.1% (p?=?.182) and 21.7% (p?=?.002), respectively. Hemoglobin significantly increased (p?<?.001). Intravenous iron was administered to 92.8% of patients. No adverse reactions were reported.

Conclusions: Intravenous iron is the first line in the treatment of Iron deficiency anemia in Inflammatory Bowel disease and it is safe and effective. Persistent anemia and iron deficiency are common.     

Treatment of iron deficiency anemia associated with gastrointestinal tract diseases

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a common site of bleeding that may lead to iron deficiency anemia (IDA). Treatment of IDA depends on severity and acuity of patients’ signs and symptoms. While red blood cell transfusions may be required in hemodynamically unstable patients, transfusions should be avoided in chronically anemic patients due to their potential side effects and cost. Iron studies need to be performed after episodes of GI bleeding and stores need to be replenished before anemia develops. Oral ...     

Intravenous iron in inflammatory bowel disease

The prevalence of anemia across studies on patients with inflammatory bowel disease （IBD） is high （30%）. Both iron deficiency （ID） and anemia of chronic disease contribute most to the development of anemia in IBD. The prevalence of ID is even higher （45%）. Anemia and ID negatively impact the patient＇s quality of life. Therefore, together with an adequate control of disease activity, iron replacement therapy should start as soon as anemia or ID is detected to attain a normal hemoglobin （Hb） and iron status. Many patients will respond to oral iron, but compliance may be poor, whereas intravenous （IV） compounds are safe, provide a faster Hb increase and iron store repletion, and presents a lower rate of treatment discontinuation. Absolute indications for IV iron treatment should include severe anemia, intolerance or inappropriate response to oral iron, severe intestinal disease activity, or use of an erythropoietic stimulating agent. Four different products are principally used in clinical practice, which differ in their pharmacokinetic properties and safety profiles： iron gluconate and iron sucrose （lower single doses）, and iron dextran and ferric carboxymaltose （higher single doses）. After the initial resolution of anemia and the repletion of iron stores, the patient＇s hematological and iron parameters should be carefully and periodically monitored, and maintenance iron treatment should be provided as required. New IV preparations that allow for giving 1000-1500 mg in a single session, thus facilitating patient management,provide an excellent tool to prevent or treat anemia and ID in this patient population, which in turn avoids allogeneic blood transfusion and improves their quality of life.     

Anemia and iron deficiency in gastrointestinal and liver conditions

Iron deficiency anemia(IDA) is associated with a number of pathological gastrointestinal conditions other than inflammatory bowel disease, and also with liver disorders. Different factors such as chronic bleeding, malabsorption and inflammation may contribute to IDA. Although patients with symptoms of anemia are frequently referred to gastroenterologists, the approach to diagnosis and selection of treatment as well as follow-up measures is not standardized and suboptimal. Iron deficiency, even without anemia, can substantially impact physical and cognitive function and reduce quality of life. Therefore, regular iron status assessment and awareness of the clinical consequences of impaired iron status are critical. While the range of options for treatment of IDA is increasing due to the availability of effective and well-tolerated parenteral iron preparations, a comprehensive overview of IDA and its therapy in patients with gastrointestinal conditions is currently lacking. Furthermore, definitions and assessment of iron status lack harmonization and there is a paucity of expert guidelines on this topic. This review summarizes current thinking concerning IDA as a common co-morbidity in specific gastrointestinal and liver disorders, and thus encourages a more unified treatment approach to anemia and iron deficiency, while offering gastroenterologists guidance on treatment options for IDA in everyday clinical practice.     

Iron replacement therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients with iron deficiency anemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and aimsIron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a common problem in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and has a significant negative impact on quality of life. The aim was to compare the clinical efficacy of intravenous (IV) versus oral (PO) iron replacement in adult IBD with iron deficiency anemia (IDA).MethodsA systematic search for randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of IV versus PO iron therapy in the treatment of IDA in adult IBD patients. The primary outcome was the mean change in the hemoglobin at the end of study and secondary outcomes include mean change in ferritin, clinical disease activity index, quality of life score and the adverse reaction rate.ResultsThe search strategy identified 757 articles while only three industry-funded articles met the inclusion criteria for systematic review and meta-analysis. The total sample size was 333 patients with 203 patients receiving IV therapy. IV route was associated with a 6.8 g/L higher mean hemoglobin increment and 110 μg/L higher mean ferritin increment. The IBD activity index and Quality of Life scores were comparable between the two treatment groups. More adverse events were reported in the oral treatment group with the odds for discontinuation being 6.2 (CI 2.2, 17.1).ConclusionsIntravenous iron treatment is better tolerated and more effective than oral iron treatment in improving ferritin. The higher hemoglobin gain with the IV route was small and of uncertain clinical significance. The combined sample size of the included studies was small and further clinical trials are required.     

Iron deficiency anemia in inflammatory bowel disease

Anemia is a common extraintestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) and is frequently overlooked as a complication. Patients with IBD are commonly found to have iron deficiency anemia(IDA) secondary to chronic blood loss, and impaired iron absorption due to tissue inflammation. Patients with iron deficiency may not always manifest with signs and symptoms; so, hemoglobin levels in patients with IBD must be regularly monitored for earlier detection of anemia. IDA in IBD is associated with poor quality of life, necessitating prompt diagnosis and appropriate treatment. IDA is often associated with inflammation in patients with IBD. Thus, commonly used labora-tory parameters are inadequate to diagnose IDA, and newer iron indices, such as reticulocyte hemoglobin content or percentage of hypochromic red cells or zinc protoporphyrin, are required to differentiate IDA from anemia of chronic disease. Oral iron preparations are available and are used in patients with mild disease activity. These preparations are inexpensive and con-venient, but can produce gastrointestinal side effects, such as abdominal pain and diarrhea, that limit their use and patient compliance. These preparations are partly absorbed due to inflammation. Non-absorbed iron can be toxic and worsen IBD disease activity. Although cost-effective intravenous iron formulations are widely available and have improved safety profiles, physicians are reluctant to use them. We present a review of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of IDA in IBD, improved diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, efficacy, and safety of iron replacement in IBD.     

老年缺铁性贫血与幽门螺杆菌感染的临床分析

目的探讨铁剂合并抗幽门螺杆菌(Hp)治疗对老年人缺铁性贫血(IDA)伴Hp阳性慢性胃炎患者的贫血纠正效果,探讨Hp感染与IDA形成的相关性。方法将59例IDA伴Hp阳性慢性胃炎患者,分为A、B2组。A组单纯补铁治疗,B组联合应用补铁及Hp根除治疗;检测治疗前后其血红蛋白及血清铁、总铁结合力、铁蛋白水平,并对Hp进行检测。结果补铁联合抗Hp治疗较单纯补铁治疗效果显著(P<0.05)。结论Hp感染可造成或加重机体铁吸收不良,抗Hp治疗有助于提高IDA伴Hp感染患者的临床疗效。     

Pediatric Crohn's disease,iron deficiency anemia and intravenous iron treatment: a follow-up study

Background and aims: Increasing evidence in adults demonstrates efficacy and safety of IV iron in inflammatory Bowel disease (IBD) associated iron deficiency anemia; however, evidence in pediatric patients is yet scarce and no previous study has included a long follow-up. This study aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of IV iron (primary end point), and the need of re-treatment (secondary end point), in this setting.

Methods: Prospective recruitment (40 months); PCDAI determined before and after treatment; anemia defined according to WHO criteria; IV iron treatment included iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose. Primary and secondary endpoints included hemoglobin, serum ferritin, transferrin saturation at baseline and 4-6 weeks after treatment; and the need of re-treatment during the median follow-up period (18 months), respectively.

Results: Nineteen patients (median age: 15.5 years) with remissive/mild disease were included. At recruitment, the median hemoglobin was 10.5?g/dl, (median s-ferritin: 20.1 ug/l, median transferrin saturation; 6%) and 4-6 weeks after treatment was 12.7?g/dl. Median hemoglobin according to age groups before vs. after treatment:?<12 years:11 vs. 12.0?g/dl; females ≥12 years:9.9 vs. 12.6?g/dl; and males ≥12 years:11.1 vs. 13.3?g/dl. Patients with remissive vs. mild disease had median Hb of 10.5?g/dl vs. 10.6?g/dl, and median s-ferritin: 6.8 ug/dl vs. 43.3 ug/dl, respectively). Nine patients were treated with iron sucrose (median dose 672.6?mg/dl) and 10 patients with ferric carboxymaltose (median dose 811.5?mg/dl). No major adverse reactions occurred. Six patients needed re-treatment after a median 15.5 months period.

Conclusions: Our prospective study, concerning pediatric IBD anemia patients with remission/mild disease and a significant follow-up, emphasizes efficacy and safety of IV-iron and the importance of long-term follow-up of iron status.

Summary: In pediatric IBD iron anemia, the evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of IV-iron is scare. This prospective study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy (short and long term) of IV-iron in these patients. Nineteen pediatric CD patients were evaluated before and after IV iron treatment (40-month period).The median Hb before and after IV iron was 10.5 and 12.7?g/dl, respectively. No major adverse reactions were documented. Six patients needed re-treatment (median period of 15.5 months). This study further demonstrates the efficacy and safety of IV iron. It reinforces the importance of long-term follow-up of the iron status in pediatric CD patients.     

Treatment of iron deficiency anemia in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

Opinion statement Anemia is a frequent extraintestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that is commonly overlooked, despite its significant impact on quality of life. Characteristic symptoms include chronic fatigue, headache, and subtle impairment of cognitive function, although some less common symptoms include dyspnea, dizziness, pica, angular stomatitis, shortened attention span, and esophageal webs. Several types of anemia are associated with IBD, but iron deficiency anemia (IDA) accounts for the majority of cases and others include anemia of chronic disease, anemia associated with vitamin deficiency (vitamin B₁₂ and folate), autoimmune anemia, and anemia caused by medication used to treat IBD. The diagnosis of IDA relies on laboratory blood tests. Therefore, these tests should be obtained on a regular basis because characteristic symptoms may be absent or not readily recognized by patients and their clinicians. Complete blood count may suffice; however, iron studies and serum vitamin levels may be necessary to differentiate between specific types of anemia. During the diagnostic process, it is important to consider coexistence of different types of anemia, especially if no response to therapy is noted. The therapy for anemia is directed towards treatment of the underlying inflammatory process and supplemental therapy, depending on the type of deficiency. Iron deficiency anemia is treated with iron preparations, first orally, and if unresponsive or if associated with untoward adverse events leading to decrease in adherence with the therapeutic regimen, with intravenous preparations. Intramuscular therapy has been abandoned due to high rate of complications. Intravenous therapy may be administered as a multiple-dose regimen (intravenous iron sucrose and gluconate) or as a single intravenous dose (iron dextran), which is associated with a higher risk of allergic infusion reactions and requires obligatory test dose administration. Treatment with erythropoietin is reserved for a select subgroup of patients with anemia of chronic disease. With appropriate treatment, the majority of patients with IBD will have significant improvement or resolution of anemia, which can lead to a better quality of life. However, a high index of suspicion should be maintained in order to identify the precise cause of anemia and to prescribe the appropriate therapy.     

High serum transferrin receptor level in anemia of chronic disorders indicates coexistent iron deficiency

Blood transferrin receptor (TR) level is largely determined by the quantum of erythropoiesis and by intracellular iron content of the cells of the erythroid lineage. Hence, a high serum TR level has been found to be useful in distinguishing iron deficiency anemia (IDA) from anemia of chronic disorders (ACD). In order to examine its potential role in the diagnosis of concomitant iron deficiency in ACD, we determined serum TR levels in 130 cases of ACD, in 25 cases of IDA, and in 40 normal adults. As expected, all patients of IDA had significantly higher serum TR levels compared to the normal subjects (4.2-19.2 microg/dL vs. 1.3-3.0 microg/dL) (P < 0.002). In 11/25 cases of IDA, the total iron-binding capacity (TIBC) was in the normal range although bone marrow iron store was absent and serum TR levels were high, thereby highlighting the superiority of TR level in the diagnosis of iron deficiency compared to TIBC. Although 54% (70/130) patients of ACD had normal or low serum TR levels (0.9-3.0 microg/dL) as expected, in 46% (60/130) of ACD patients, serum TR levels were high (3.2-11.0 microg/dL). Mean corpuscular volume, red cell distribution width, and transferrin saturation were significantly lower (P < 0.001) in the latter group of patients compared to the former, and these parameters resembled those in IDA patients. Also, serum iron was lower and TIBC was higher in this group of ACD patients compared to those with normal or low serum TR. All these features point to an "IDA-like" profile of ACD patients with high TR and support the possibility of co-existent iron deficiency in this subgroup of ACD patients. In light of these observations it would be prudent to treat ACD patients with high serum TR levels with iron replacement therapy.     

Low hemoglobin density potential marker of iron availability

Introduction: Low hemoglobin density (LHD%) is a new parameter provided by Beckman‐Coulter derived from the mean cell hemoglobin concentration, using the mathematical sigmoid transformation This study investigated the reliability of LHD% for the assessment of iron status in the presence of inflammation. Methods: Healthy subjects (n = 90) and patients with iron deficiency (IDA, n = 110), chronic kidney disease (CKD, n = 65) and anemia of chronic disease (ACD, n = 85; 24 were iron deficient and 61 were iron sufficient) were analyzed on a LH 780 analyzer (Beckman Coulter Inc., Miami, FL, USA). Independent samples U test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were applied. To determine the concordance between LHD% and soluble transferrin receptor (sTrR) Cohen’s κ index was calculated. Results: LHD % values showed no statistical difference in patients with IDA and patients with ACD accompanied with IDA (P = 0.6427); LHD% values in these patients were significantly different (P < 0.0001) compared with the iron‐sufficient patients with ACD. ROC analysis for LHD% in the detection of iron deficiency showed the following: area under curve 0.903; cut off 5.5%, sensitivity 88.6%, specificity 76.9%; κ index, 0.65. Conclusion: LHD% is a reliable parameter for the detection of iron deficiency in patients with anemia in the presence of inflammation.     

缺铁性贫血患者抗幽门螺旋杆菌治疗的价值

目的：了解幽门螺旋杆菌（HP）感染对缺铁性贫血（IDA）发病的影响及抗HP治疗对改善贫血的价值。方法：对116例IDA患者补铁治疗并检测HP感染的情况。分组：A组为给予去除缺铁原因治疗和补铁治疗可以达到IDA痊愈者,B组为无明显缺铁原因但单纯补铁效果不好的IDA患者。对B组患者给予抗HP治疗,观察抗HP治疗前后患者Hb、平均红细胞体积（MCV）、平均红细胞血红蛋白含量（MCH）、血清铁蛋白（SF）的变化。结果：116例IDA患者中,A组74例给予去除缺铁原因治疗和（或）补铁治疗可以达到IDA痊愈,其中HP感染43例,感染率58.1%;B组42例无明显缺铁原因但是单纯补铁效果不好的IDA患者中HP感染者36例,感染率85.7%,2组间HP感染率的差异有统计学意义。对B组中HP阳性者给予抗HP治疗,抗HP治疗有效者Hb、MCV、MCH、SF较治疗前有明显提高。结论：HP感染可能与IDA的发生有关,清除HP的治疗可改善IDA的疗效。     

Diagnosis and management of iron deficiency anemia in patients with IBD

Anemia is the most prevalent extraintestinal complication of IBD. It can affect quality of life and ability to work, and can also increase the hospitalization rate in patients with IBD. Although the causes of anemia in IBD are multifactorial, iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is the most common. Assessment of the iron status of patients who have a condition associated with inflammation, such as IBD, by using common biochemical values is insufficient. However, new indices of iron metabolism (for instance ferritin:transferrin receptor ratio, reticulocyte hemoglobin content or percentage of hypochromic red blood cells) may help to improve the assessment of iron status in patients with IBD. The treatment of IDA traditionally involves oral iron supplementation. However, because of extensive gastrointestinal adverse effects, and data showing that the use of oral iron in IBD may be associated with disease exacerbation, current guidelines suggest that iron supplementation in IBD should be administered intravenously. This Review provides an overview of iron homeostasis in health before discussing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for IDA in patients with IBD.     

Serum hepcidin‐25 may replace the ferritin index in the Thomas plot in assessing iron status in anemic patients

Introduction: Biochemical markers of iron deficiency do not distinguish iron‐deficient anemia (IDA) from the anemia of chronic disease (ACD) and the combined state of ACD/IDA. Serum hepcidin‐25 might be a marker resolving this problem. We investigated the extent to which serum hepcidin‐25 enables the differentiation of the states above in comparison with the ferritin index plot, the so‐called Thomas plot [soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR)/log ferritin and the reticulocyte hemoglobin content (CHr)]. Methods: Serum hepcidin‐25 was determined in 155 anemic patients who were classified as having latent iron deficiency (latent ID), IDA, ACD, or ACD/IDA using the ferritin index plot (Thomas plot). Hepcidin‐25 was determined using an isotope‐dilution micro‐HPLC‐tandem mass spectrometry method. The ability to discriminate among these states based on serum hepcidin‐25 alone or in combination with the CHr was evaluated in a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and a comparison with the recently established ferritin index plot. Results: Serum hepcidin‐25 correlated with ferritin and the ferritin index. Use of a hepcidin‐25 cutoff level of ≤4 nmol/l allowed the differentiation of IDA from ACD and ACD/IDA. Furthermore, the discrimination of ACD/IDA from ACD required combination with CHr in a new plot (hepcidin‐25 and the CHr). The hepcidin‐25 plot and the ferritin index plot showed a good correspondence in the differentiation of iron states in patients with anemia. Conclusion: Patients with IDA can be differentiated from ACD and ACD/IDA but not ACD from ACD/IDA based on hepcidin‐25 alone. The combination of hepcidin‐25 with CHr in the hepcidin‐25 plot was useful for the differentiation of the states above.     

Reticulocyte haemoglobin content vs. soluble transferrin receptor and ferritin index in iron deficiency anaemia accompanied with inflammation

Ferritin concentration, as a parameter of iron status that is commonly used in the diagnosis of iron deficiency anaemia (IDA), often has limited values if the iron deficiency is accompanied by inflammatory disease. This study evaluated the value of reticulocyte haemoglobin content (CHr) and soluble transferrin receptor-ferritin index (sTfR/F) in the diagnosis of IDA and differential diagnosis of IDA and anaemia of chronic disease. The study included 66 nonanaemic individuals as controls, 86 patients with IDA divided into noninflammatory and inflammatory subgroups, and 32 patients with anaemia of chronic disease. Blood count, iron, transferrin saturation, total iron binding capacity, ferritin, C-reactive protein, sTfR and CHr were determined. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis showed very high discriminating power for CHr, soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) and sTfR/F in the diagnosis of IDA. In patients with anaemia of chronic disease these parameters showed no significant difference from the control. CHr and sTfR enabled recognition of iron deficiency and were not affected by acute phase reaction. They are sensitive markers of body iron status with additional value to conventional tests for the detection of iron deficiency.     

A Phase III,randomized, open‐label trial of ferumoxytol compared with iron sucrose for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in patients with a history of unsatisfactory oral iron therapy

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is the most common form of anemia worldwide. Although oral iron is used as first‐line treatment, many patients are unresponsive to or cannot take oral iron. This Phase III, open‐label, non‐inferiority study compared the efficacy and safety of ferumoxytol, a rapid, injectable intravenous (IV) iron product with low immunological reactivity and minimal detectable free iron, with IV iron sucrose in adults with IDA of any cause. Patients (N = 605) were randomized 2:1 to receive ferumoxytol (n = 406, two doses of 510 mg 5 ± 3 days apart) or iron sucrose (n = 199, five doses of 200 mg on five nonconsecutive days over 14 days) and followed for 5 weeks. Ferumoxytol demonstrated noninferiority to iron sucrose at the primary endpoint, the proportion of patients achieving a hemoglobin increase of ≥2 g dL^?1 at any time from Baseline to Week 5 (ferumoxytol, 84.0% [n = 406] vs. iron sucrose, 81.4% [n = 199]), with a noninferiority margin of 15%. Ferumoxytol was superior to iron sucrose (2.7 g dL^?1 vs. 2.4 g dL^?1) in the mean change in hemoglobin from Baseline to Week 5 (the alternative preplanned primary endpoint) with P = 0.0124. Transferrin saturation, quality‐of‐life measures, and safety outcomes were similar between the two treatment groups. Overall, ferumoxytol demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy to iron sucrose, suggesting that ferumoxytol may be a useful treatment option for patients with IDA in whom oral iron was unsatisfactory or could not be used. Am. J. Hematol. 89:646–650, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Factor V Leiden mutation carriership and venous thromboembolism in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia

The aim of the present study is to evaluate in an elderly hospitalized population the diagnostic value of the serum transferrin receptor (sTfR) in distinguishing IDA (iron deficiency anemia) from ACD (anemia of chronic disease) as compared to conventional laboratory tests of iron metabolism, especially serum ferritin. In a prospective study, 34 patients with IDA and 38 patients with ACD (a chronic disorder in 23 and an acute infection in 15) were evaluated using iron status tests including serum transferrin receptor assay. The iron stores were assessed by bone marrow examination. sTfR levels were elevated (>28.1 nmol/L) in 68% of the IDA patients but also in 43% of the patients with ACD-chronic inflammation and 33% with ACD-acute infection. Serum ferritin was the best test to differentiate IDA from ACD patients. We conclude that serum ferritin is a more sensitive and specific parameter than the sTfR assay to predict the bone marrow iron status in an elderly anemic population.     

A randomized trial of iron isomaltoside versus iron sucrose in patients with iron deficiency anemia

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is common in many chronic diseases, and intravenous (IV) iron offers a rapid and efficient iron correction. This trial compared the efficacy and safety of iron isomaltoside and iron sucrose in patients with IDA who were intolerant of, or unresponsive to, oral iron. The trial was an open‐label, comparative, multi‐center trial. Five hundred and eleven patients with IDA from different causes were randomized 2:1 to iron isomaltoside or iron sucrose and followed for 5 weeks. The cumulative dose of iron isomaltoside was based on body weight and hemoglobin (Hb), administered as either a 1000 mg infusion over more than 15 minutes or 500 mg injection over 2 minutes. The cumulative dose of iron sucrose was calculated according to Ganzoni and administered as repeated 200 mg infusions over 30 minutes. The mean cumulative dose of iron isomaltoside was 1640.2 (standard deviation (SD): 357.6) mg and of iron sucrose 1127.9 (SD: 343.3) mg. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a Hb increase ≥2 g/dL from baseline at any time between weeks 1‐5. Both non‐inferiority and superiority were confirmed for the primary endpoint, and a shorter time to Hb increase ≥2 g/dL was observed with iron isomaltoside. For all biochemical efficacy parameters, faster and/or greater improvements were found with iron isomaltoside. Both treatments were well tolerated; 0.6% experienced a serious adverse drug reaction. Iron isomaltoside was more effective than iron sucrose in achieving a rapid improvement in Hb. Furthermore, iron isomaltoside has an advantage over iron sucrose in allowing higher cumulative dosing in fewer administrations. Both treatments were well tolerated in a broad population with IDA.