Carotid angioplasty and stent-induced bradycardia and hypotension: Impact of prophylactic atropine administration and prior carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE: We compared the physiologic effect of selective atropine administration for bradycardia with routine prophylactic administration, before balloon inflation, during carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). We also compared the incidence of procedural bradycardia and hypotension for CAS in patients with primary stenosis vs those with prior ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: A total of 86 patients were treated with CAS at 3 institutions. Complete periprocedural information was available for 75 of these patients. The median degree of stenosis was 90% (range, 60%-99%). Indications for CAS were severe comorbidities (n = 49), prior CEA (n = 21), and prior neck radiation (n = 5). Twenty patients with primary lesions were treated selectively with atropine only if symptomatic bradycardia occurred (nonprophylactic group). Thirty-four patients with primary lesions received routine prophylactic atropine administration before balloon inflation or stent deployment (prophylactic group). The 21 patients with prior CEA received selective atropine treatment only if symptomatic bradycardia occurred (prior CEA group) and were analyzed separately. Mean age and cardiac comorbidities did not vary significantly either between the prophylactic and nonprophylactic atropine groups or between the primary and prior CEA patient groups. Outcome measures included bradycardia (decrease in heart rate >50% or absolute heart rate <40 bpm), hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg or mean blood pressure <50 mm Hg), requirement for vasopressors, and cardiac morbidity (myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure). RESULTS: The overall incidence of hypotension and bradycardia in patients treated with CAS was 25 (33%) of 75. A decreased incidence of intraoperative bradycardia (9% vs 50%; P < .001) and perioperative cardiac morbidity (0% vs 15%; P < .05) was observed in patients with primary stenosis who received prophylactic atropine as compared with patients who did not receive prophylactic atropine. CAS after prior CEA was associated with a significantly lower incidence of perioperative bradycardia (10% vs 33%; P < .05), hypotension (5% vs 32%; P < .05), and vasopressor requirement (5% vs 30%; P < .05), with a trend toward a lower incidence of cardiac morbidity (0% vs 6%; not significant) as compared with patients treated with CAS for primary carotid lesions. There were no significant predictive demographic factors for bradycardia and hypotension after CAS. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of prophylactic atropine before balloon inflation during CAS decreases the incidence of intraoperative bradycardia and cardiac morbidity in primary CAS patients. Periprocedural bradycardia, hypotension, and the need for vasopressors occur more frequently with primary CAS than with redo CAS procedures. On the basis of our data, we recommend that prophylactic atropine administration be considered in patients with primary carotid lesions undergoing CAS.     

Risk of stroke for carotid endarterectomy patients with contralateral carotid occlusion

The role of a contralateral carotid occlusion in the appearance of neurological complications after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) operations is a matter of some debate. In the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial, the risk of perioperative stroke was found to be higher in patients with a contralateral carotid occlusion. In a literature survey in 2004, however, a significantly increased risk of perioperative stroke was found in only one out of 17 studies on contralateral carotid occlusion patients. We therefore examined the frequency of stroke in patients with contralateral carotid occlusion at our own institution and performed a meta-analysis based on 19 representative studies, including the data from our own institution. Out of 1,960 CEAs at the authors' institute, a significantly higher frequency of 5.6% compared to 2.1% (p = 0.012) for perioperative stroke risk was seen in patients with contralateral carotid occlusion compared to those without. The meta-analysis, based on 19 studies, also showed in 13,438 CEA operations a significantly higher perioperative stroke rate of 3.7% compared to 2.4% (p = 0.002) in the presence of a contralateral carotid occlusion. Nevertheless, due to the extremely poor outcomes of medically treated symptomatic patients, a surgical or endovascular procedure should be sought for these patients. Since the superiority of angioplasty/stent procedures has not yet been verified compared to surgical procedures in these patients, special indication for an endovascular procedure should also be taken into consideration.     

Does contralateral carotid occlusion influence neurologic fate of carotid endarterectomy?

Divergent opinions regarding operative risks and late prognosis of patients undergoing endarterectomy for carotid stenosis with contralateral carotid occlusion have prompted a review of the experience at Emory University Hospital from Jan. 1, 1978, through Dec. 31, 1982. Fifty-four patients (37 men, 17 women; mean age 63 years) who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with contralateral carotid occlusion (group I) were compared with 410 demographically similar patients without contralateral carotid occlusion (group II) who underwent 503 CEAs during the same interval. CEA indications in group I were the following and were proportionately similar to those of group II: hemispheric transient ischemic attacks, 22 patients; asymptomatic stenosis, 12 patients; nonhemispheric symptoms, 11 patients; previous cerebral infarction, eight patients; and vascular tinnitus, one patient. General anesthesia, routine intraluminal shunting, systemic heparinization, and arteriotomy closure without patch were routinely employed in both groups. Three patients in group I suffered permanent neurologic deficits after operation (5.6%) and two had transient postoperative deficits with complete recovery. Ten patients (2.0%) in group II suffered permanent neurologic deficits and 10 patients experienced transient neurologic events after operation. Neither the transient nor the permanent neurologic deficit rates were statistically different (p greater than 0.05; Fisher exact test) in the two groups. Operative mortality rates for group I and group II were 0% and 0.8%, respectively, and were not significantly different (p greater than 0.10; Fisher exact test). Late postoperative ischemic brain infarctions occurred in two patients in group I (3.8%) and in 13 patients (3.6%) in group II (p greater than 0.10; Fisher exact test). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were virtually identical in both groups, with the majority of deaths caused by cardiac occlusion may undergo CEA with morbidity and mortality rates similar to those without contralateral occlusions. Contralateral carotid occlusion does not necessarily portend an unfavorable early or late prognosis after CEA.     

High-risk carotid endarterectomy: fact or fiction

OBJECTIVE: It has been proposed that patients whose conditions do not meet North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial inclusion criteria or have anatomic risk factors constitute a "high-risk" group for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and might be candidates for primary carotid angioplasty stenting. Our objective was to review a consecutive series of isolated CEAs, identify the number of such patients at high risk, and determine whether their operations were associated with increased complication rate. METHODS: Consecutive isolated CEAs performed between June 1996 and June 2001 were reviewed. High-risk comorbidities included: age 80 years or more (n = 80), New York Heart Association class III/IV angina (n = 16), Canadian class III/IV heart failure (n = 4), myocardial infarct 6 months or less (n = 11), steroid-dependent or oxygen-dependent pulmonary disease (n = 4), and creatinine level of 3 or more (n = 13). Anatomic high risk was defined by: contralateral occlusion (n = 66), lesion above C(2) or requirement of digastric division (n = 53), reoperation (n = 29), and neck radiation (n = 3). Statistical analysis was with chi(2) analysis. RESULTS: Of 788 patients reviewed, 228 (29%) were classified as high risk by one or more of the previous criteria (63% comorbidity, 28% anatomy, 9% both). Presence of preoperative neurologic symptoms and postoperative results were similar across all patient groups. The total stroke and death rate was 1.1% for all the patients. Six patients had postoperative strokes (0.8%), and three patients died of myocardial infarcts (0.4%). The stroke and death rate was 1.3% in the high-risk group as compared with 1.1% in the normal-risk group (P =.51). CONCLUSION: The concept of the high-risk CEA must be critically reexamined. Although 29% of patients for CEA were high risk as defined by others, we found no evidence that this influenced the results after CEA. Patients with significant medical comorbidities, contralateral carotid occlusion, and high carotid lesions can undergo operation without increased complications. If a high-risk group exists, it is small and restricted to reoperation or radiated neck (4% in this series). With this possible exception, carotid angioplasty stenting should be restricted to randomized clinical trials.     

Single center experience on eversion versus standard carotid endarterectomy: a prospective non-randomized study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The prospective studies that have compared the outcomes of eversion and standard longitudinal carotid endarcterectomy (CEA) have been few and small and available data to reach definitive conclusions are still scarce. This prospective, non-randomized study sought to compare eversion and standard CEA for early and late mortality and morbidity and the incidence of late restenosis. METHODS: Between 1992 and 1997, we performed 2806 CEAs in 2469 patients (2124 eversion CEAs in 1859 patients and 682 standard CEAs in 610 patients). All patients underwent preoperative neurological examination and cervical duplex scanning. Patients were followed up by neurological evaluation and duplex scanning at 1 and 6months after CEA, and yearly afterwards. RESULTS: Demographics and neurologic inidications for CEA were similar in both groups. Mean clamping time was shorter in the eversion CEA group (13.5+/-6.1 vs 19.9+/-19.1min, P<0.001). Early (30-day) postoperative mortality due to major stroke was lower after eversion CEA (10/2124 vs 9/682, P=0. 037), as well as total cardiovascular mortality (16/2124 vs 12/682, P=0.038). Early carotid occlusion was more frequent in standard CEA group (12/2124 vs 11/682, P=0.017), as well as total early morbidity (112/2124 vs 53/682, P<0.001). During follow-up (mean 56 months, range 6-92), restenosis rate was lower in the eversion CEA group (0. 5 vs 1.8%, P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that eversion CEA as compared to standard CEA technique is associated with lower total cardiovascular perioperative mortality and mortality due to major stroke, shorter clamping time, lower early occlusion rate, and lower late restenosis rate.     

Single-center prospective, randomized analysis of conventional and eversion carotid endarterectomy

AIM: Several studies, comparing early and long-term results of the conventional carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and eversion carotid endarterectomy (EEA), were conducted for past 10 years. Nevertheless, it still remaining difficult to choose optimal endarterectomy technique. Choice yet mainly depends of experience of attending surgeon. The aim of this study was the comparison early and long-term results of the EEA and CEA. METHODS: Randomly, 103 patients were operated on in the eversion, and 98 patients in the conventional technique; 97 (48.3%) patients were asymptomatic and 104 (51.7%) had symptomatic lesions. All patients underwent preoperative cervical duplex scaning and neurological examination. The surgical procedure was carried out under general anesthesia. In cases with retrograde blood pressure less than 20 mmHg shunt was used; 78.6% of all CEA were finished up with 'patch' angioplasty and 21.4% by primary suture. The primary outcomes were perioperative and late mortality, perioperative and late central neurological complications, a long-term survival rate and late restenosis incidence. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 38 months. Mortality and long-term survival rate were similar in compared groups. The perioperative central neurological complications incidence were comparable in study groups (3.9% vs 12.1% ,odds ratio 3.45, 95% confidence interval 1.1-11.1; P=0.029). The late restenosis incidence was significantly lower in eversion group (0.0% vs 6.1%). CONCLUSION: EEA has an advantage over the conventional procedure. The authors recommend CEA in cases when retrograde pressure indicated the use of the intraluminal shunting.     

Morbidity and mortality of carotid endarterectomy

Summary A review of the mortality and morbidity of carotid endarterectomy reported during the last 10 years was made and compared to the risk of carotid stenosis managed by the best medical treatment. For comparison, the patients were classified in asymptomatic patients (grade I), patients with transient ischaemic attacks (grade II), patients with ischaemic neurological deficits operated on acutely (grade III) and into patients with no or incomplete recovery 4–6 weeks after the stroke (grade IV). Based on the results of this literature review, only patients in grade II seem to benefit from carotid endarterectomy.     

Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cerebral hyperperfusion and cognitive impairment after carotid endarterectomy

OBJECT: Cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) impairs cognitive function and is often detected on cerebral blood flow (CBF) imaging. The purpose of the present study is to investigate structural brain damage seen on magnetic resonance (MR) images obtained in patients with cerebral hyperperfusion and cognitive impairment after CEA. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-eight patients with ipsilateral internal carotid artery stenosis (> or = 70%) underwent CEA. Neuropsychological testing was performed preoperatively and at the 1st postoperative month. Cerebral blood flow was measured using single-photon emission computed tomography before, immediately after, and 3 days after surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed before and 1 day after surgery. In patients with post-CEA hyperperfusion (defined as a CBF increase > or = 100% compared with preoperative values) on CBF imaging, MR images were also obtained on the 3rd postoperative day, the day on which hyperperfusion syndrome developed, and 1 month after the operation. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative cognitive impairment was significantly higher in patients with post-CEA hyperperfusion on CBF imaging (12 [75%] of 16 patients) than in those without (6 [4%] of 142 patients; p < 0.0001). Only 1 of 5 patients with cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome developed reversible brain edema in the cerebral hemisphere ipsilateral to the CEA on MR images obtained on the day hyperperfusion syndrome occurred. However, postoperative cognitive impairment developed in all 5 patients with cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome regardless of the presence or absence of new lesions on MR images. In addition, postoperative cognitive impairment developed in 5 (45%) of 11 patients with asymptomatic cerebral hyperperfusion on CBF imaging despite the absence of new lesions on any postoperative MR images. CONCLUSIONS: Although cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after CEA sometimes results in reversible brain edema visible on MR imaging, postoperative cerebral hyperperfusion -- even when asymptomatic -- often results in impaired cognitive function without structural brain damage on MR imaging.     

Evaluation of subclinical cerebral injury and neuropsychologic function in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy

We examined subclinical alterations of cerebral function during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and predictability of minor cerebral damage by perioperative levels of biochemical markers of brain damage (S100B and neuron-specific enolase [NSE]). Twenty consecutive patients with > or =70% asymptomatic carotid stenosis undergoing elective CEA were enrolled. Pre- and postoperative testing included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head, a standardized neurological exam, a battery of neuropsychological tests, and measurement of serum levels of S100B and NSE. There were no major ischemic strokes. In one patient, a mild weakness of the contralateral lower extremity was discovered on neurological examination; in another individual, postoperative MRI revealed two new small subcortical lesions without clinical correlate. While S100B increased significantly early after opening of the carotid clamp (p = 0.015), the NSE increase did not reach statistical significance. As a group, participants obtained a significantly higher mean overall neuropsychological score at follow-up testing (p < 0.05). In one patient, a significant decline of cognitive function was observed. This was the only individual to obtain a consistently high S100B and NSE increase. Neuropsychological testing combined with measurements of S100B and NSE may improve sensitivity when assessing subtle cerebral damage following CEA.     

Myocardial revascularization before carotid endarterectomy

Diffuse atherosclerosis involving more than 1 vascular bed is a challenging problem. The natural histories of carotid and coronary atherosclerosis are clearly intertwined. The optimal strategies for treatment of patients who present with carotid artery stenoses and co-existent coronary artery disease (CAD) remain controversial. Minimally invasive screening tests for CAD are often unreliable, and patients presenting with significant extracranial carotid artery stenoses should usually be assumed to harbor some degree of CAD. Numerous studies have confirmed, however, that in contrast to peripheral artery stenoses, hemodynamically significant stenoses of the coronary arteries are not necessarily the index lesions that produce myocardial infarctions (MIs). Although there are some anecdotal reports that myocardial revascularization prior to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) improves the short- and long-term cardiac outcomes of patients after CEA, no prospective, randomized, controlled studies have proven this hypothesis. Numerous adverse cardiac events can occur in the perioperative period including congestive heart failure (CHF), arrhythmias, unstable angina pectoris and both nonfatal and fatal MIs. Of these, only MIs are truly "hard" endpoints. The incidence of MI after CEA is much lower than after other commonly performed peripheral arterial operations such as aortic or infrainguinal procedures. The perioperative nonfatal and fatal MI rates after CEA average about 1.0% and 0.4%, respectively. The Coronary Artery Revascularization Prophylaxis (CARP) study is currently ongoing in the United States as a multicentered randomized prospective controlled trial sponsored by the Department of Veterans Affairs. In this study, patients with significant CAD who are undergoing operations for peripheral arterial disease are randomized to myocardial revascularization versus best medical care; however, CEA procedures are excluded from this study because cardiac morbidity is low. Based on the low incidence of adverse cardiac events in CEA patients, it is generally prudent to treat their CAD with best medical care rather than routine prophylactic myocardial revascularization.     

Combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass graft

Atherosclerosis is a generalized disease which afflicts a considerable number of patients in both the carotid and coronary arteries. Although the risk of stroke or death use to combined carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is thought to be higher than that of each individual operation, the combined procedure is generally preferred over staged operations to treat such patients. We performed the combined procedure safely with the aid of intraoperative portable digital subtraction angiography (DSA). This report describes our experience with the operative strategy of simultaneous CEA and CABG. Ninety CEA and 404 CABG were carried out between January 1989 and December 1997. A total of six patients received the combined procedure with the aid of intraoperative DSA; they were studied retrospectively. Postoperative mortality and morbidity after the combined procedure was 0%. In the combined procedure, neurological complications are difficult to detect after CEA because the patient must be maintained under general anesthesia and extracorporeal circulation during the subsequent CABG. However, intraoperative DSA can confirm patency of the internal carotid artery and absence of flap formation after CEA, and the CABG can be performed safely. Intraoperative portable DSA between CEA and CABG is helpful in preventing perioperative stroke in the combined procedure.     

Impact of completion angiography on operative conduct and results of carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the impact of operative completion angiography on conduct and results of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Completion imaging by angiography, ultrasound or angioscopy reveals occasional residual lesions after CEA. The importance and appropriate management of these lesions remain controversial with respect to operative morbidity and long-term restenosis. METHODS: Carotid endarterectomy was performed 410 times for transient ischemic attack (44%), amaurosis fugax (19%), prior stroke (10%), and asymptomatic carotid stenosis (27%). Routine intraoperative completion angiograms were obtained to exclude significant residual lesions. Postoperative ultrasound follow-up was obtained in 232 patients over a mean interval of 17.3 months. RESULTS: Angiography revealed 71 defects warranting correction in 66 cases (16.1%), including kinks (23), external carotid flaps (18), common carotid plaque (10), thrombus (10), distal internal carotid stenosis (8), intracranial occlusion (1), and spasm (1). Operative morbidity included seven ipsilateral strokes (1.7%) and operative mortality was 0.7%. During follow-up, restenosis > 80% was detected in 17 (7.3%) of 232 arteries, 9 (3.9%) of which underwent reoperation. Rates of restenosis of > 80% were similar between sexes and patched versus unpatched arteries. CONCLUSIONS: Routine completion angiography after CEA guides use of selective operative revision contributing to low rates of perioperative morbidity and restenosis.     

Early carotid endarterectomy after acute stroke

PURPOSE: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after acute stroke is generally delayed 6 to 8 weeks because of fear of stroke progression. This delay can result in an interval stroke rate of 9% to 15%. We analyzed our results with CEA performed within 1 to 4 weeks of stroke. METHODS: Records for all patients undergoing CEA after stroke between 1980 and 2001 were analyzed. Perioperative evaluation included carotid duplex scanning or angiography, and head computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. All patients with nonworsening neurologic status, additional brain territory at risk for recurrent stroke, and severe ipsilateral carotid stenosis underwent CEA. Patients were grouped according to time of CEA after stroke: group 1, first week; group 2, second week; group 3, third week; group 4, fourth week. Statistical analysis was performed with the chi(2) test, logistic regression, and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-eight patients underwent CEA within 1 to 4 weeks of stroke. Perioperative permanent neurologic deficits occurred in 2.8% of patients in group 1 (72 procedures), 3.4% of patients in group 2 (59 procedures), 3.4% of patients in group 3 (29 procedures), and 2.6% of patients in group 4 (78 procedures). There was no relationship between location or size of preoperative infarct and time of surgery. Only preoperative infarct size correlated with probability of neurologic deficit after CEA (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Incidence of postoperative stroke exacerbation is similar at all intervals. The results are within acceptable limits for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis. CEA may be performed within 1 month of stroke with similar results at all intervals during this period.     

The impact of anesthetic modality on the outcome of carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) reduces the risk of stroke in patients with high-grade carotid artery stenosis. This study evaluates the clinical outcome of CEA performed under local anesthesia (LA) versus general anesthesia (GA). METHODS: Clinical variables and treatment outcomes were analyzed in 548 CEAs performed under either LA or GA during a 30-month period. Factors associated with morbidity were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 263 CEAs under LA and 285 CEA under GA were analyzed. The LA group was associated with a lower incidence of shunt placement, operative time, and perioperative hemodynamic instability compared to the GA group. No differences in neurologic complications or mortality were found between the 2 groups. Hyperlipidemia was a risk factor for postoperative morbidity in both the LA and GA groups, while age greater than 75 years was associated with increased overall morbidity in the GA group but not the LA group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that increased age is associated with increased morbidity in CEA under GA, while hyperlipidemia is associated with increased morbidity in CEA regardless of the anesthetic choice.     

Patients requiring dialysis are not at risk of greater complication after carotid endarterectomy

Stroke is a leading cause of disability and the third leading cause of death. Landmark studies have demonstrated that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) reduced the risk of stroke among selected patients with carotid stenosis. Renal insufficiency is a known risk factor for stroke and appears to be an independent risk factor for poor outcome after CEA. Studies have reported high morbidity and mortality after CEA in patients on dialysis. However, our experience has been that patients undergoing dialysis have no greater risk for a poor outcome. This study was a retrospective review of our CEA patients to ascertain our morbidity and mortality results in dialysis patients versus patients not on dialysis. An institutional retrospective chart review of CEAs from January 1999 to December 2007 was conducted. Patients on dialysis at the time of CEA were identified. Their charts were reviewed for complications 30 days after surgery. This was compared with our total experience with CEAs from January 1999 to December 2007. Of the 28 patients undergoing CEA while dialysis dependent, none had complications in the 30-day postoperative period. This compares favorably with the cohort of all CEAs by the same surgeons. In that group, 13 complications were identified (13 of 1,141). Patients undergoing dialysis are at no greater risk for complications when undergoing carotid endarterectomy than the general population.     

A comparison of carotid artery stenting with neuroprotection versus carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) reduce the risk of stroke in patients with high-grade carotid artery stenosis. Despite the known impact of type of anesthesia on outcome after CEA, none of the current studies comparing CEA with CAS addresses the effect of anesthetic choice on perioperative events. In this study, we compare our results of distally protected CAS versus CEA under local anesthesia. METHODS: Clinical data of 345 patients who underwent 372 procedures for carotid artery occlusive disease over a 36-month were retrospectively collected for this analysis. Distal embolic protection was used in CAS procedures. All procedures, both CEA (n = 221, 59%) and CAS (N = 152, 41%), were performed under local anesthesia. The primary outcome measure was aggregate 30-day major ipsilateral stroke and/or death. Follow-up serial Duplex ultrasound examinations were performed. RESULTS: Both patient cohorts were similar in terms of demographic and risk factors, with the exception of a higher incidence of coronary artery disease in the CAS group (59% versus 30%, P <.05). The 30-day stroke and death rates were 3.2% (CAS) and 3.7% (CEA) (P = not significant). Cranial nerve injury only occurred in the CEA patients (2.3%). Perioperative hemodynamic instability was more common among patients in the CAS group (11.9% versus 4.1%, P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous carotid stenting with neuroprotection provides comparable clinical success to CEA performed under local anesthetic. Further studies are warranted to validate the long-term efficacy of CAS and to elucidate patient selection criteria for endovascular carotid revascularization.     

The influence of concurrent carotid endarterectomy on coronary bypass: a case-controlled study

BACKGROUND: Concurrent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are associated with an increased incidence of stroke and death compared to isolated CABG. It is unclear whether this reflects two concurrent operative procedures or the increased risk in patients with more extensive atherosclerosis. METHODS: To address this question, a case controlled study was performed using data from the New York State Cardiac Database from 1997 to 1998. Patients who underwent combined CEA-CABG were compared with all isolated CABG patients and a risk-matched cohort of isolated CABG patients. RESULTS: The 35,539 isolated CABG patients had fewer postoperative complications than the 744 combined CEA-CABG patients, but also had a lower overall risk profile. The isolated CABG patients had a lower incidence of stroke (2% vs 5.1%), death (2% vs 4.4%), and combined stroke and death (3.7% vs 8.1%) compared with the combined group ( P < .001). After risk-factor matching, no differences in stroke (5% vs 5.1%), death (3.9% vs 4.4%), or combined stroke and death (8.5% vs 8.1%) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Although increased complications are reported after CEA-CABG, these do not differ from those of a risk-matched cohort of isolated CABG patients. Thus, the major morbidity of combined CEA-CABG is due to inherent patient risk and not the addition of CEA to CABG.     

Patient and hospital benefits of local anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: this study reviews and compares carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed under local anaesthesia (LA) with CEA performed under general anaesthesia (GA) in a single institution. METHODS: data were collected prospectively from 240 CEA procedures. 140 GA CEA procedures are compared to 100 LA CEA procedures in terms of outcome, operative techniques, complications, and length of stay. RESULTS: the groups were similar for age, gender distribution and preoperative risk factors. There were more asymptomatic patients in the LA group. There were no significant differences in death, stroke or death/stroke rate between the two techniques. LA CEA was associated with lower shunt rate (LA 13%, GA 50%, p < 0.001), lower incidence of intraoperative hypotension (LA 8%, GA 40%, p < 0.001), decreased hospital stay (median (IQ); LA 2 (1-2), GA 3 (1-4), and a cost saving of pound235 per CEA procedure. CONCLUSIONS: carotid endarterectomy can be performed safely under local anaesthesia with the advantage that LA CEA enables the surgeon to monitor and selectively shunt patients more accurately. In addition LA CEA is associated with a shorter hospital stay and important cost savings.     

Thirty-day morbidity and mortality rates for carotid artery intervention by surgeons who perform both carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery angioplasty and stent placement

OBJECT: There is no known standard 30-day morbidity and mortality rate for high-risk patients undergoing carotid artery (CA) angioplasty and stent (CAS) placement. The high-risk registries and the Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy, Carotid Revascularization using Endarterectomy or Stenting Systems, and European Long-term Carotid Artery Stenting trials report different rates of morbidity and mortality, and each high-risk cohort has a different risk profile. The applicability of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) results from North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial/Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (NASCET/ACAS) remains uncertain, as most clinical CAS placement series reported to date typically included patients who would not have qualified for those studies. At the University at Buffalo, the same neurosurgeons perform triage in patients with CA disease and perform both CEA and CAS insertion. The authors review morbidity and mortality rates in this practice model. METHODS: Diagnosis-related group codes were used to search the authors' practice database for patients who had undergone a completed CA intervention solely for the indication of atherosclerotic disease. One hundred twenty patients (129 vessels) treated with CAS surgery and 95 patients (100 vessels) treated with CEA met these criteria. In the CAS placement group, 78% of the patients would not have met NASCET/ACAS inclusion criteria. Demographic and clinical data for both groups were recorded on a spreadsheet for analysis. At 30 days, one patient in the CEA group and two in the CAS group had died. Stroke occurred in one patient in the CAS group and none in the CEA group. Myocardial infarction (MI) occurred in one patient who underwent CAS surgery compared with three undergoing CEA. Composite incidence of stroke/death/MI was 3.3% in the CAS group and 3.2% in the CEA group. CONCLUSIONS: In a practice in which surgeons perform both CEA and CAS surgery, the event rates for the CAS surgery equivalent to NASCET and ACAS rates for CEA can be achieved, even in high-risk NASCET/ACAS-ineligible patients in 78% of the CAS cases.     

Early transfer from intensive care does not influence clinical results of carotid endarterectomy]

The purpose of this prospective observational study was to examine the necessity of intensive care after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). In consideration of the neurological stage and comorbidities, morbidity and mortality after early transfer from the intensive care unit (ICU) were examined. The CEA patients were assigned preoperatively to short or long monitoring. Those with symptomatic stenosis ranking > or =2 (stroke within 6 weeks before surgery) and ischemic areas in cCT were observed overnight (long) in the ICU. Within 5.5 months, 100 consecutive patients had received 107 CEAs. Preoperatively, seven of these (6.54%) were assigned to ICU overnight monitoring. 14 patients (13%) needed postoperative over night ICU.We observed no perioperative stroke or mortality in the 107 consecutive CEAs. We could not detect any risk factor in preoperatively determining the length of postoperative ICU monitoring. This prospective, single center study showed that, after CEA, it is safe to monitor patients for only a short period (4-8 h) in the ICU. Morbidity and mortality after early transfer to the regular ward did not increase.