Lymphoproliferative disease after lung transplantation: comparison of presentation and outcome of early and late cases.

BACKGROUND: Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) after lung transplantation has not been fully characterized. In previous studies, the incidence has varied substantially, and most cases have been reported during the first year after transplantation. The purpose of this study was to review our center's experience with PTLD and to analyze the pattern of disease and determinants of outcome. METHODS: Among 494 adult lung (n = 491) or heart-lung (n = 3) recipients, 30 cases of PTLD were retrospectively identified. The cases were classified by site(s) of involvement, histology and time of onset (early, < or =1 year, and late, >1 year after transplantation). The outcome of each case was ascertained, and risk factors for death were analyzed in a multivariate model. RESULTS: PTLD was identified in 30 (6.1%) of the recipients during 1,687 patient-years (median 2.8 years) of follow-up. The incidence density was 1.8 cases per 100 patient-years. Fourteen cases were diagnosed during the first year after transplantation, and 16 cases in subsequent years. The incidence density was significantly higher in the first year than in later years (3.3 cases/100 patient-years versus 1.3 cases/100 patient years; p <.008). Presentation in the thorax and involvement of the allograft were significantly more common in the early cases (thorax: 12 of 14, 86%; allograft: 9 of 14, 64%) than in the late cases (thorax: 2 of 16, 12%; allograft: 2 of 16, 12%). There was no difference in survival after the diagnosis of PTLD between the early and late cases, but survival time after diagnosis was significantly longer in cases with, than those without, allograft involvement (median 2.6 years vs 0.2 year, respectively; log rank p = 0.007).The presentation and pattern of organ involvement of PTLD after lung transplantation is related to the time of onset. CONCLUSIONS: Disease in the thorax and involvement of the allograft are common in the first year after transplantation, but other sites, especially the gastrointestinal tract, predominate later. PTLD that is confined to the allograft appears to have a somewhat better prognosis than disease that involves other sites.     

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders in lung transplant recipients: 20-yr experience at the University of Minnesota

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are potentially fatal complications of solid organ transplantation. The natural history of PTLD varies considerably among the different types of organs transplanted. While lung transplant recipients are highly susceptible to PTLD, there are only a few small studies that detail PTLD in this setting. We undertook this study to better describe the characteristics and treatment response in PTLD after lung transplantation. We conducted a retrospective chart review of lung and heart/lung-transplant recipients between 1985 and 2008. A total of 32 cases (5%) of PTLD were identified in 639 patients. The median interval after transplantation to the diagnosis was 40 (3-242) months. Eight patients (25%) were diagnosed within one yr of transplantation and had PTLD predominantly within the thorax and allograft. Twenty-four patients (75%) were diagnosed more than one yr after transplantation and their tumors mainly affected the gastrointestinal tract. Monomorphic PTLD, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, was diagnosed in 91%. Treatment of PTLD varied according to stage and clinical circumstances. Twenty-four patients (75%) have died. The median overall survival was 10 (0-108) months. PTLD after lung transplantation remains a challenge as a result of its frequency, complexity and disappointing outcome.     

Epidemiology of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders in adult kidney and kidney pancreas recipients: report of the French registry and analysis of subgroups of lymphomas

A registry of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) was set up for the entire population of adult kidney transplant recipients in France. Cases of PTLD were prospectively enrolled between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2007. Ten-year cumulative incidence was analyzed in patients transplanted after January 1, 1989. PTLD risk factors were analyzed in patients transplanted after January 1, 1998 by Cox analysis. Cumulative incidence was 1% after 5 years, 2.1% after 10 years. Multivariate analysis showed that PTLD was significantly associated with: older age of the recipient 47-60 years and >60 years (vs. 33-46 years, adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 1.87, CI = 1.22-2.86 and AHR = 2.80, CI = 1.73-4.55, respectively, p < 0.0001), simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (AHR = 2.52, CI = 1.27-5.01 p = 0.008), year of transplant 1998-1999 and 2000-2001 (vs. 2006-2007, AHR = 3.36, CI = 1.64-6.87 and AHR = 3.08, CI = 1.55-6.15, respectively, p = 0.003), EBV mismatch (HR = 5.31, CI = 3.36-8.39, p < 0.001), 5 or 6 HLA mismatches (vs. 0-4, AHR = 1.54, CI = 1.12-2.12, p = 0.008), and induction therapy (AHR = 1.42, CI = 1-2.02, p = 0.05). Analyses of subgroups of PTLD provided new information about PTLD risk factors for early, late, EBV positive and negative, polymorphic, monomorphic, graft and cerebral lymphomas. This nationwide study highlights the increased risk of PTLD as long as 10 years after transplantation and the role of cofactors in modifying PTLD risk, particularly in specific PTLD subgroups.     

Chest size matching in single and double lung transplantation.

We applied predicted vital capacity to chest size matching between donor and recipient in lung transplantation to 15 single-lung transplant recipients with pulmonary fibrosis and to 20 double-lung transplant recipients with emphysema or non-emphysema. The predicted vital capacity of the donor was significantly correlated with the predicted vital capacity of the recipient both in double-lung transplantation (r = 0.79, p = 0.001) and single-lung transplantation (r = 0.71, p = 0.003). In double-lung transplantation, the post-transplant vital capacity was correlated with the predicted vital capacity of the recipient (r = 0.74, p = 0.002). Emphysema patients and non-emphysema patients contributed equally to this correlation. In left single lung transplantation, there was a weak correlation between the post-transplant vital capacity and the predicted vital capacity of the donor in the allograft (r = 0.57, p = 0.1095). In right single lung transplantation, the post-transplant vital capacity of the allograft tended to be correlated with the predicted vital capacity of recipient (r = 0.77, p = 0.0735). We concluded that donors were actually selected based on the comparison of predicted vital capacity between donor and recipient. In double-lung transplantation, the post-transplant vital capacity was limited by the recipient's normal thoracic volume and was not influenced by underlying pulmonary disease. In single-lung transplantation with pulmonary fibrosis, the allograft transplanted in the left chest could expand to its own size, and the allograft transplanted in the right chest could expand to the recipient's normal thoracic volume as in double-lung transplantation.     

Chest size matching in single and double lung transplantation

We applied predicted vital capacity to chest size matching between donor and recipient in lung transplantation to 15 single-lung transplant recipients with pulmonary fibrosis and to 20 double-lung transplant recipients with emphysema or non-emphysema. The predicted vital capacity of the donor was significantly correlated with the predicted vital capacity of the recipient both in double-lung transplantation (r = 0.79, p = 0.001) and single-lung transplantation (r = 0.71, p = 0.003). In double-lung transplantation, the post-transplant vital capacity was correlated with the predicted vital capacity of the recipient (r = 0.74, p = 0.002). Emphysema patients and non-emphysema patients contributed equally to this correlation. In left single lung transplantation, there was a weak correlation between the post-transplant vital capacity and the predicted vital capacity of the donor in the allograft (r = 0.57, p = 0.1095). In right single lung transplantation, the post-transplant vital capacity of the allograft tended to be correlated with the predicted vital capacity of recipient (r = 0.77, p = 0.0735). We concluded that donors were actually selected based on the comparison of predicted vital capacity between donor and recipient. In double-lung transplantation, the post-transplant vital capacity was limited by the recipient’s normal thoracic volume and was not influenced by underlying pulmonary disease. In single-lung transplantation with pulmonary fibrosis, the allograft transplanted in the left chest could expand to its own size, and the allograft transplanted in the right chest could expand to the recipient’s normal thoracic volume as in double-lung transplantation.     

Epstein-Barr virus seronegativity is a risk factor for late-onset posttransplant lymphoroliferative disorder in adult renal allograft recipients

BACKGROUND: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) remains a difficult management issue; therefore, many studies focus on the identification of risk factors to allow for preventive strategies. We investigated risk factors for PTLD in the adult renal transplant setting. METHODS: A single-center, matched case-control study design was used. Cases were identified from patients who underwent a first renal transplant between January 1, 1985, and December 1, 2001. Two controls were chosen per case, matched (+/-1 year) by date of transplant and graft survival. Clinical and demographic data were ascertained from medical records. Pretransplant serology for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus was confirmed on frozen, stored sera. Statistical analysis included univariate and multivariable examination of putative risk factors using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Twenty cases of PTLD were identified, an incidence of 2.4%. Median time from transplant to diagnosis was 55 months (range, 3-168 months), with 16 cases of late-onset PTLD (>1 year posttransplant). The only significant risk in univariate analysis was EBV-negative status at transplant (risk ratio 6.0, P=0.03). In multivariable analysis, EBV-negative status remained significant (adjusted risk ratio 8.9, P=0.01). The risk related to EBV status held true when late cases were analyzed separately (adjusted risk ratio 7.1, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Pretransplant EBV-seronegative status is a strong risk for development of PTLD in adult renal allograft recipients, even in late disease. These results indicate that primary infection with EBV may have a pathogenic role in some cases of late PTLD.     

Outcomes of Pediatric Kidney Transplantation in Recipients of a Previous Non‐Renal Solid Organ Transplant

Children who receive a non‐renal solid organ transplant may develop secondary renal failure requiring kidney transplantation. We investigated outcomes of 165 pediatric kidney transplant recipients who previously received a heart, lung, or liver transplant using data from 1988 to 2012 reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing. Patient and allograft survival were compared with 330 matched primary kidney transplant (PKT) recipients. Kidney transplantation after solid organ transplant (KASOT) recipients experienced similar allograft survival: 5‐ and 10‐year graft survival was 78% and 60% in KASOT recipients, compared to 80% and 61% in PKT recipients (p = 0.69). However, KASOT recipients demonstrated worse 10‐year patient survival (75% KASOT vs. 97% PKT, p < 0.001). Competing risks analysis indicated that KASOT recipients more often experienced graft loss due to patient death (p < 0.001), whereas allograft failure per se was more common in PKT recipients (p = 0.01). To study more recent outcomes, kidney transplants performed from 2006 to 2012 were separately investigated. Since 2006, KASOT and PKT recipients had similar 5‐year graft survival (82% KASOT vs. 83% PKT, p = 0.48), although 5‐year patient survival of KASOT recipients remained inferior (90% KASOT vs. 98% PKT, p < 0.001). We conclude that despite decreased patient survival, kidney allograft outcomes in pediatric KASOT recipients are comparable to those of PKT recipients.     

Hepatitis C, acute humoral rejection, and renal allograft survival

The effect of recipient hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection on renal allograft loss and acute rejection in kidney transplantation remains controversial. We studied 354 renal allograft recipients transplanted during 1996 to 2001 who had HCV antibodies (Ab) measured before transplantation. The primary outcome was death-censored allograft loss and the secondary outcome was acute humoral rejection (AHR). Compared with HCV Ab-negative patients, those with positive HCV Ab had longer time on dialysis before transplantation, higher percentage of panel-reactive antibodies (PRA), were more likely to receive a cadaveric transplant, and were more likely to develop delayed graft function (DGF). In univariate analyses, predictors of renal allograft loss included HCV, cadaveric graft, PRA >20%, HLA mismatch > or =5, retransplantation, DGF, induction therapy, and AHR. When adjusted for PRA >20%, HLA mismatch > or =5, and multiple transplant status, HCV was not a statistically significant predictor of allograft loss. HCV was also associated with AHR but lost significance when adjusted for PRA >20%. HCV Ab-positive patients were more likely to have longer duration of dialysis before transplantation prior to kidney transplants, higher PRA, and to receive cadaveric transplants. These characteristics likely resulted in more DGF and AHR after transplantation. After adjusting for these confounding factors, the association between HCV Ab positivity and renal allograft loss was notably attenuated and no longer statistically significant.     

Post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disease in lung transplantation: A nested case‐control study

Post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) may compromise long‐term outcome of lung transplant (LTx) recipients. A case‐control study was performed, comparing LTx recipients with PTLD (n=31) to matched recipients without PTLD (Controls, n=62). Risk factors for PTLD and post‐transplant outcomes were assessed. PTLD prevalence was 3.9%, time to PTLD 323 (166‐1132) days; and 54.8% had early‐onset PTLD versus 45.2% late‐onset PTLD. At LTx, more Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV)‐seronegative patients were present in PTLD (42%) compared to Controls (5%) (P<.0001); most of whom had undergone EBV seroconversion upon PTLD diagnosis. EBV viral load was higher in PTLD versus Controls (P<.0001). Overall, lower hemoglobin and higher C‐reactive protein levels were present in PTLD versus Controls (P<.0001). EBV status at LTx (P=.0073) and EBV viral load at PTLD (P=.0002) were the most important risk determinates for later PTLD. Patients with PTLD demonstrated shorter time to onset of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) (P=.0006) and poorer 5‐year survival post‐LTx (66.6% versus 91.5%), resulting in worse CLAD‐free survival (HR 2.127, 95%CI 1.006‐4.500; P=.0483) and overall survival (HR 3.297 95%CI 1.473‐7.382; P=.0037) compared to Controls. Late‐onset PTLD had worse survival compared to early‐onset PTLD (P=.021). Primary EBV infection is a risk for PTLD; which is associated with worse long‐term outcome post‐LTx.     

Lymphoma after living donor kidney transplantation: an Iranian multicenter experience

Introduction  Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are well-recognized complications in solid organ recipients. Limited data exist about the development of PTLDs in living kidney recipients. This study deals with a multicenter nationwide experience with kidney recipients from living donors. Methods  We reviewed data of PTLD patients from a total population of 6,500 patients transplanted at three different transplant centers in Iran from 1984 to 2006. We also compared their data with 2,250 normal kidney recipients of Baqiyatallah Transplant Center. Data were analyzed to determine potential correlates with the occurrence of PTLD and patient outcome. Results  Overall, 31 patients were diagnosed as having post-transplant lymphomas. The incidence of PTLD in our kidney transplant population comprised 0.47%. Sixteen (53%) PTLD patients were females, whereas 15 (47%) were males. The mean ages at transplantation and diagnosis were 37.1 and 41.9, respectively. Twelve (63%) patients died, and seven are alive. All deaths occurred within the 1st year after PTLD diagnosis. The mean time period from transplantation to diagnosis of PTLD was 64 (0.7–173) months. Localization of PTLD in the brain associated the worst outcome. Compared to non-PTLD patients, PTLD patients were significantly female predominated (51.6% vs. 32.2%; P = 0.03) and had lower age at transplantation (36.9 years vs. 42.9 years, respectively; P = 0.01). Patients under immunosuppressive regimens containing azathioprine were at higher risk for acquiring PTLDs compared to those with a MMF-containing regimen. Conclusion  PTLD is a major threat to kidney transplant recipients. Immunosuppressive agents have a significant role in developing the disease. Early detection of the disease and using more safe immunosuppresants may have beneficial effects on patient outcomes and incidence of the disease.     

Impact of Simultaneous Kidney–Pancreas Transplant and Timing of Transplant on Kidney Allograft Survival

Since 1988 over 10 000 simultaneous cadaveric pancreas-kidney transplants (SPK) have been performed in the United States among patients with end-stage renal disease due to Type 1 diabetes (T1DM). The two aims of this study were to assess the impact on kidney allograft survival of (i) SPK versus transplantation of a kidney alone (KA), and (ii) SPK prior to versus after initiation of chronic dialysis. This retrospective, non-concurrent cohort study examined registry data collected from 8323 patients waitlisted in the United States for an SPK and transplanted with either an SPK or a KA during January 1, 1990 - October 31, 2002. SPK recipients had an adjusted hazard ratio for kidney allograft loss of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.51-0.77, p < 0.001) compared to transplantation without pancreas allograft. SPK recipients who received their allografts prior to beginning chronic dialysis had a lower rate of kidney allograft loss than SPK recipients who received their transplant after initiation of chronic dialysis (adjusted hazard rates (HR) = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.69-0.99, p = 0.042). Simultaneous transplantation of pancreas-kidney compared to kidney transplantation alone and SPK prior to the initiation of chronic dialysis compared to SPK after initiation of dialysis were both associated with longer kidney allograft survival.     

Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders Occurring After Renal Transplantation in Adults: Report of 230 Cases From the French Registry

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are a rare but serious complication after organ transplantation. A French Registry of PTLD was set up in a nationwide population of kidney transplant recipients. We prospectively enrolled all adult kidney recipients developing PTLD between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2003. We analyzed the incidence, risk and prognostic factors of PTLD by Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses. Totally 230 cases of PTLD were referred to the French Registry. Cumulative incidence was 1.18% after 5 years. Older age (per year, AHR = 2.19, CI = 1.22-3.94) and recipient Epstein-Barr virus seronegativity (AHR = 3.01, CI = 1.57-5.08) were associated with an increased risk of PTLD. Patients with PTLD had a reduced survival rate (61% at 5 years). Graft PTLD had the best prognosis with an 81% survival rate after 5 years. Infection with hepatitis C or B virus (HCV or HBV), late-onset PTLD, multiple sites involvement and high Ann Arbor staging were risk factors for patient death. Use of azathioprine was associated with a poorer survival rate. PTLD incidence and risk factors in French recipients are in line with the international or American PTLD series. We highlighted the role of HBV or HCV in patient mortality and described the relevant prognosis factors for patients with post-transplant lymphoproliferations.     

Rapid decreases in donor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursor frequencies and graft outcome after liver and lung transplantation

BACKGROUND: A decrease in donor-specific T cell precursor frequencies as seen late, one or more years, after transplantation is assumed to reflect transplantation tolerance, a condition important for long term acceptance of the allograft. However, such late decreases also occur in recipients that developed chronic transplant dysfunction questioning its relevance in transplantation tolerance. We investigated whether early, i.e., the first 6 months, decreases in donor-specific T cell precursor frequencies reflect transplantation tolerance and predict graft outcome after liver and lung transplantation. METHODS: Donor and third party specific cytotoxic (CTLp) and helper T lymphocyte precursor (HTLp) frequencies were analyzed in pretransplant and 1 (or 2) and 6-month blood samples taken from liver and lung recipients and were correlated with graft outcome. RESULTS: In liver allograft recipients with good graft function (n=7), mean donor-specific CTLp frequencies decreased as early as 1 month after transplantation and remained low thereafter. In contrast, mean CTLp frequencies did not decrease in liver allograft recipients with chronic transplant dysfunction (n=6). In lung allograft recipients, donor-specific CTLp frequencies remained relatively high and frequencies were not different between recipients without (n=6) or with (n=6) chronic transplant dysfunction. Donor-specific HTLp frequencies did not change significantly after liver or lung transplantation and did not differ between recipients without or with chronic transplant dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: An early decrease in donor-specific CTLp correlates with good graft outcome after liver transplantation. Such rapid decreases in alloreactivity do not occur after lung transplantation illustrating the unique capacity of liver allografts to induce transplantation tolerance.     

Epstein-Barr virus-DNA load monitoring late after lung transplantation: a surrogate marker of the degree of immunosuppression and a safe guide to reduce immunosuppression

BACKGROUND: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a serious complication after lung transplantation and its relation with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is well recognized. It has been postulated that preemptive reduction of immunosuppression guided by EBV-DNA load may lead to a significantly lower incidence of PTLD, because of the reconstitution of T-cell control. In this report, we describe the feasibility of this approach in terms of safety with regard to the risk of acute as well as chronic allograft rejection in 75 lung transplant recipients transplanted between 1990 and 2001 and followed for this study from June 1, 2001 until January 1, 2006. METHODS: From all patients visiting our outpatient clinic, EBV-DNA load was measured at least twice a year during the study period. In patients with positive results, measurements were repeated every two to four weeks. EBV reactivation was defined as two consecutive EBV-DNA load measurements with a rising trend; with the last measurement exceeding 10.000 copies/mL under stable immunosuppression. In such case, immunosuppression was reduced. RESULTS: EBV reactivation was observed in 26/75 patients (35%). One (1.5%) of these patients developed PTLD during the study period. Acute rejection, acceleration of chronic allograft rejection, or worse survival were not observed after reduction of immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive reduction of immunosuppression after lung transplantation guided by EBV-DNA load appears to be a safe approach for the prevention of PTLD in lung transplant recipients late after transplantation.     

Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder in kidney and heart transplant recipients receiving thymoglobulin: a systematic review

Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is an important complication of transplantation. Risk factors include increased overall immunosuppression exposure and inadequate antiviral prophylaxis; however, the effects of T-cell-depleting agents on PTLD are unclear. A systematic literature review was conducted to assess PTLD in clinical studies published 1999-2009 in transplant patients with ≥3 years follow-up who received Thymoglobulin for induction. Twenty studies were identified (12 kidney, 7 heart, and 1 liver), of which 3 were excluded for insufficient PTLD reporting. The final study group comprised 2,246 kidney and heart transplant recipients (liver study excluded) who received Thymoglobulin. At a median follow-up of 5 years, the incidence of PTLD was 0.98% (kidney, 0.93%; heart, 1.05%) among Thymoglobulin-treated patients. The cumulative Thymoglobulin dose reported in these studies was not associated with the development of PTLD (P = NS). However, incidence of PTLD was significantly lower with antiviral prophylaxis (0.63%) than without (1.87%; P = .013). Heart transplant recipients not receiving antiviral prophylaxis had the highest PTLD incidence, possibly attributable to a greater overall immunosuppressive burden. This analysis revealed that PTLD incidences in kidney and heart transplant recipients receiving Thymoglobulin were low overall and perhaps related more to concomitant anti-viral prophylaxis use.     

Analysis of Factors that Influence Survival with Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder in Renal Transplant Recipients: The Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry Experience

Significant mortality is associated with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in kidney transplant recipients (KTX). Univariate/multivariate risk factor survival analysis of US PTLD KTX reported to Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry from November 1968 to January 2000 was performed. PTLD presented 18 (median) (range 1–310) months in 402 KTX. Death rates were greater for those diagnosed within 6 months (64%) versus beyond 6 months (54%, p = 0.04). No differences in death risk for gender, race, immunosuppression, EBV, B or T cell positivity were identified. Death risk increased for multiple versus single sites (73% vs. 53%, hazards ratio (HR) 1.4). A 1-year increase in age increased HR for death by 2%. Surgery was associated with increased survival (55% vs. 0% without surgery) (p < 0.0001). Patients with allograft involvement, treated with transplant nephrectomy alone (n = 20), had 80% survival versus 53% without allograft removal (n = 15) (p < 0.001). Overall survival was 69% for allograft involvement alone versus 36% for other organ involvement plus allograft (n = 19 alive) (p < 0.0001). Death risk was greater for multiple site PTLD and increasing age, and risks were additive. Univariate analysis identified increased death risk for those not receiving surgery, particularly allograft involvement alone.     

Influence of host-recipient origin on clinical aspects of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a well-known complication of immunosuppression associated with solid organ transplantation. The donor or host origin of PTLD may influence the outcome of the disease as it has been reported that a donor origin may be associated with a better prognosis. The aim of the study was to determine the origin (recipient or donor) of 12 PTLD occurring in kidney transplant recipients and to correlate the results with clinical findings. METHODS: Origin of PTLD was determined using HLA DRB1 molecular typing, analysis of multiple short-tandem repeat microsatellite loci, and HLA class I antigen expression by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Combining the three techniques, we found that eight cases originated from the recipient and four cases originated from the donor. The results of the three techniques were concordant and altogether assigned the origin of the tumors. All the donor-origin PTLD were strictly localized to the kidney graft, developed after a mean time of 5 months after transplantation, and regressed after reduction of immunosuppression. In contrast, seven of the eight recipient-origin PTLD presented as multisystemic disease, occurred a mean time of 75.7 months after the transplantation, and had a worse outcome (mortality, five deaths of eight patients, 62.5%). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that PTLD originating from the donor arise in the first year after transplantation into the graft, and that recipient-origin PTLD develop later as an invasive disease. Because it permits simultaneously the analysis of cell morphology and tumor origin, immunohistochemistry is a more reliable technique in the case of graft tumors associated with allograft rejection. The determination of the origin of the tumors seems to be of value in the management of PTLD to predict the outcome and to adapt therapy.     

Weekend effect on early allograft outcome after kidney transplantation‐ a multi‐centre cohort study

Weekend surgery may be associated with a higher risk of early complications, but the effect of the timing of kidney transplant surgery on early allograft outcome remains uncertain. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the association between weekend transplant surgery and allograft failure was modified by prevalent vascular disease. Using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant registry, we examined the association between weekend status and 90‐day and 1‐year allograft failure in deceased donor transplant recipients between 1994–2012. Two‐way interaction between vascular disease and weekend status was examined. Of 6622 recipients, 1868 (28.2%) received transplants during weekends. Compared with weekday transplants, weekend transplants were associated with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for 90‐day and 1‐year allograft failure of 0.99 (0.78–1.25; P = 0.917) and 0.93 (0.76–1.13, P = 0.468), respectively. There was a significant interaction between prevalent vascular disease and weekend status for 90‐day allograft failure (P_interaction = 0.008) but not at 1‐year, such that patients with vascular disease were more likely to experience 90‐day allograft failure if transplanted on weekend (versus weekdays), particularly failures secondary to vascular complications. Timing of transplantation does not impact on allograft outcome, although those with vascular disease may benefit from more intensive post‐transplant follow‐up for potential vascular complications.     

Are heart transplant recipients more likely to develop skin cancer than kidney transplant recipients?

Abstract Non‐melanoma skin cancer is frequent in organ transplant recipients. The risk of post‐transplant cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in Norwegian heart transplant recipients (n = 148) and kidney transplant recipients (n = 1020) on triple immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisolone, transplanted between 1983 and 1992, were studied. After adjustment for age at transplantation in multivariable Cox models, heart transplant recipients had a significantly 2.8‐times higher risk of developing squamous cell carcinoma relative to kidney transplant recipients. The risk relative to the general population (standardized incidence ratio) was higher in heart transplant recipients than in kidney transplant recipients. The results indicate that heart transplant recipients are more likely to be diagnosed with skin cancer than kidney transplant recipients, probably due to the higher doses of cyclosporine and azathioprine after heart transplantation used at our center in the study period.     

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in pancreas transplantation: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a rare, serious complication of transplantation. The characteristics and associations of this disease in pancreas recipients have not been extensively studied. METHODS: From January 1988 through December 2002, 787 pancreas and 569 kidney-pancreas transplants were performed at our institution. Eighteen pancreas recipients developed polymorphic PTLD or malignant lymphoma. Data on clinical course, organ involvement, molecular characteristics, and association with immunosuppression and recent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection were compiled from the institutional transplant database. Patient survival was compared to recipients of liver and kidney transplants at the same center by using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The 5-year cumulative incidence of PTLD in simultaneous pancreas-kidney, pancreas after kidney, and pancreas transplant alone recipients was 2.5%, 1.2%, and 1.0%, respectively (P = 0.23). A noticeably, but not significantly, higher cumulative incidence was seen in the more recent era since 1995 (2.1% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.15). PTLD in pancreas recipients carried a worse prognosis than in liver or kidney for recipients B-cell, early-onset, and Epstein Barr virus-positive lesions. PTLD was more aggressive in pancreas recipients, with a higher stage at presentation and a trend to more bone marrow involvement. There appeared to be a tendency toward association with recent CMV infection. Since 1995, PTLD recipients have had a lower exposure to antilymphocyte preparations (25 +/- 5 vs. 10 +/- 0.8)(P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PTLD in pancreas recipients remains a rare but aggressive disease, and carries a worse prognosis in comparison to other transplant recipients. These heavily immunosuppressed patients, who often face multiple transplants, may be at greater risk; CMV infection may play an antecedent role.