Affinity purification of heparin-dependent antibodies to platelet factor 4 developed in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: biological characteristics and effects on platelet activation

Antibodies to heparin platelet factor 4 (H-PF4) complexes were purified from the plasma of three patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) using affinity chromatography. From each plasma, the largest amount of antibodies was eluted with 2 M NaCl at pH 7.5 (peak 1) and the remainder was obtained using 0.1 M glycine/0. 5 M NaCl at pH 2.5 (peak 2). In an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), we then showed that each patient had developed antibodies to PF4 displaying different characteristics. In patient 1, peak 1 IgG reacted almost exclusively with H-PF4 complexes, whereas peak 2 IgG had similar reactivity with PF4 whether or not heparin was present. Patient 2 expressed a mixture of IgA, IgM and IgG and both fractions bound to PF4 alone or to H-PF4 complexes. Finally, IgG in patient 3 only bound to H-PF4 and was unreactive with PF4 alone. Using [14C]-serotonin release assays, the antibodies developed in the three patients and exhibiting the strongest ability to activate platelets with heparin were those having the highest affinity to H-PF4. These results strongly support the hypothesis that HIT antibodies to PF4 are heterogeneous regarding their affinity and specificity for target antigens and this may greatly influence their ability to activate platelets and their pathogenicity.     

Antibodies to platelet factor 4-heparin after cardiopulmonary bypass in patients anticoagulated with unfractionated heparin or a low-molecular-weight heparin : clinical implications for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) induces platelet activation with release of platelet factor 4 (PF4), and patients are exposed to high doses of heparin (H). We investigated whether this contributes to the development of antibodies to H-PF4 and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). METHODS AND RESULTS: CPB was performed with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in 328 patients. After surgery, patients received UFH (calcium heparin, 200 IU. kg-1. d-1) (group 1, n=157) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH, Dalteparin, 5000 IU once daily) (group 2, n=171). Eight days after surgery, antibodies to H-PF4 were present in 83 patients (25.3%), 46 in group 1 and 37 in group 2 (P=0.12). Most patients (61%) had IgG1 to H-PF4, but only 8 samples with antibodies induced platelet activation with positive results on serotonin release assay. HIT occurred in 6 patients in group 1, but no thrombocytopenia was observed in subjects receiving LMWH, although 2 had high levels of antibodies with positive serotonin release assay results. When antibodies to H-PF4 were present, mean platelet counts were lower only in patients with FcgammaRIIA R/R131 platelets. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence that the development of antibodies to H-PF4 after CPB performed with UFH is not influenced by the postoperative heparin treatment. The antibodies associated with high risk of HIT are mainly IgG1, which is present at high titers in the plasma of patients continuously treated with UFH.     

Differences in specificity of heparin-dependent antibodies developed in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and consequences on cross-reactivity with danaparoid sodium

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is frequently associated with antibodies (Abs) to heparin–PF4 complexes (H-PF4). In order to investigate whether there are variations in specificity of Abs, we studied 63 samples from patients with suspected HIT. Two groups of samples were separated after comparing their reactivity against H-PF4 or recombinant PF4 (r-PF4) using ELISA. In group Ab1 ( n  = 46), Abs only or mainly bound to H-PF4 complexes and thus most of the epitopes recognized probably involved both heparin and PF4. In group Ab2 ( n  = 17), Abs exhibited similar reactivity to r-PF4 and H-PF4, and the antigens recognized were possibly neoepitopes mainly expressed by modified PF4 and by H-PF4 complexes. Platelet activation tests were positive with 56 samples containing high titres of Abs to H-PF4. Most samples ( n  = 59) contained IgG antibodies, often associated with IgA antibodies which were more frequently found in group Ab2, and/or IgM. With unfractionated heparin treatment, HIT was associated with Ab1 or Ab2 antibodies, whereas only Ab1 antibodies were detected after low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Furthermore, cross-reactivity with danaparoid sodium was present only in group Ab1 and mainly involved LMWH-treated patients.     

The role of platelet factor 4 in platelet aggregation induced by the antibodies implicated in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe side effect of heparin treatment. Recent studies using immunological methods demonstrated that antibodies contained in plasma, or in purified total immunoglobulin (Ig)G from patients suffering HIT, recognize as target antigen the complex heparin/platelet factor (PF4). In the present study, the role of PF4 in in-vitro platelet aggregation induced by purified total IgG or platelet-poor plasma from patients suffering HIT was investigated. In order to demonstrate the functional role of PF4, an anti-PF4 antibody that specifically blocked PF4 was used. In an experimental system composed of washed platelet suspension, incubation of F(ab')2 fragments (0.125 microg/ml) of the polyclonal anti-PF4 antibody resulted in complete inhibition of platelet aggregation triggered by purified total IgG from patients suffering HIT and heparin. In platelet-rich plasma, a significantly higher concentration (4.25 microg/ml) of the anti-PF4 F(ab')2 was required to inhibit platelet aggregation induced by HIT-PPP and heparin. Intermediate concentrations of the anti-PF4 antibody partially inhibited platelet aggregation. In plasma milieu, the concentration of PF4 was about five-fold higher in comparison with that measured in the purified system. The intensity of platelet aggregation depended on the concentration of HIT-IgG. Platelet aggregation was abolished in the presence of high concentrations of heparin (superior or equal to 10 IU/ml). The present study shows that PF4 is essential for platelet aggregation triggered by the antibodies related to HIT in the presence of heparin. The concentration of PF4 that is available to bind with heparin or with the HIT-related antibodies is critical for platelet aggregation induced by HIT antibodies.     

PF4/heparin-antibody complex induces monocyte tissue factor expression and release of tissue factor positive microparticles by activation of FcγRI

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially devastating form of drug-induced thrombocytopenia that occurs in patients receiving heparin for prevention or treatment of thrombosis. Patients with HIT develop autoantibodies to the platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complex, which is termed the HIT Ab complex. Despite a decrease in the platelet count, the most feared complication of HIT is thrombosis. The mechanism of thrombosis in HIT remains poorly understood. We investigated the effects of the HIT Ab complex on tissue factor (TF) expression and release of TF-positive microparticles in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and monocytes. To model these effects ex vivo, we used a murine mAb specific for the PF4/heparin complex (KKO), as well as plasma from patients with HIT. We found that the HIT Ab complex induced TF expression in monocytes and the release of TF-positive microparticles. Further, we found that induction of TF is mediated via engagement of the FcγRI receptor and activation of the MEK1-ERK1/2 signaling pathway. Our data suggest that monocyte TF may contribute to the development of thrombosis in patients with HIT.     

Pathogenicity of IgA and/or IgM antibodies to heparin–PF4 complexes in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Antibodies to heparin–PF4 (H-PF4) complexes have been tested and isotyped in 38 patients who developed severe heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (type II HIT). All the patients had a platelet count < 120 × 10⁹/l or a reduction of >30% of the initial value, occurring at least 5 d after the onset of heparin. Thrombocytopenia, which rapidly reversed following the withdrawal of heparin, was associated with thrombosis in nine patients. Although IgG isotypes were found in most cases (n = 26), the presence of only IgM and/or IgA was observed in 12 patients, including three cases showing a thrombotic complication. Our results indicate that type II HIT may be induced by IgA and/or IgM anti-H-PF4 antibodies even in the absence of IgG isotypes. This finding demonstrates that platelet Fc receptors (FcγRII) are not necessarily involved in the pathogenicity of heparin-dependent antibodies and emphasizes the major role of platelet PF4 receptors. The increased expression of the latter following a slight activation by thrombin, and the subsequent binding of IgM and IgA antibodies to H-PF4 on the platelet surface, may directly trigger platelet activation, aggregation and thrombosis. Alternatively, thrombocytopenia could be indirectly induced through the mediation of neutrophils, monocytes and lymphocytes which expose receptors for IgA (FcαR) or IgM (FcμR). IgM–platelet complexes may also bind and activate complement, leading to platelet activation or destruction. Moreover, the reactivity of the antibodies with glycosaminoglycans–PF4 complexes present on the endothelial surface could also induce endothelial lesions and promote procoagulant activity and predisposition to thrombosis.     

Pathogenicity of IgA and/or IgM antibodies to heparin–PF4 complexes in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Antibodies to heparin–PF4 (H-PF4) complexes have been tested and isotyped in 38 patients who developed severe heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (type II HIT). All the patients had a platelet count < 120 × 10⁹/l or a reduction of >30% of the initial value, occurring at least 5 d after the onset of heparin. Thrombocytopenia, which rapidly reversed following the withdrawal of heparin, was associated with thrombosis in nine patients. Although IgG isotypes were found in most cases ( n  = 26), the presence of only IgM and/or IgA was observed in 12 patients, including three cases showing a thrombotic complication. Our results indicate that type II HIT may be induced by IgA and/or IgM anti-H-PF4 antibodies even in the absence of IgG isotypes. This finding demonstrates that platelet Fc receptors (FcγRII) are not necessarily involved in the pathogenicity of heparin-dependent antibodies and emphasizes the major role of platelet PF4 receptors. The increased expression of the latter following a slight activation by thrombin, and the subsequent binding of IgM and IgA antibodies to H-PF4 on the platelet surface, may directly trigger platelet activation, aggregation and thrombosis. Alternatively, thrombocytopenia could be indirectly induced through the mediation of neutrophils, monocytes and lymphocytes which expose receptors for IgA (FcαR) or IgM (FcμR). IgM–platelet complexes may also bind and activate complement, leading to platelet activation or destruction. Moreover, the reactivity of the antibodies with glycosaminoglycans–PF4 complexes present on the endothelial surface could also induce endothelial lesions and promote procoagulant activity and predisposition to thrombosis.     

Generation of antibodies to heparin-PF4 complexes without thrombocytopenia in patients treated with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin

The incidence of antibodies to heparin-PF4 complexes (H-PF4) has been evaluated in patients who were under heparin therapy for more than 7 days: 109 patients treated with unfractionated heparin (UH) and 100 patients with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). The presence of antibodies was identified in 17% of the former group and 8% of the latter. In both the UH and the LMWH groups, IgM antibodies were found in all but four patients who showed IgA antibodies. IgG isotypes were only detected in five patients and were consistently associated to either IgM or IgA antibodies. The follow-up of H-PF4 antibodies in 76 patients treated with UH from 1 to ≥ 12 days showed a relationship between the incidence of antibodies and the duration of therapy. Despite the presence of anti-H-PF4 antibodies there was no thrombocytopenia (<150 10⁹/L) in the patients. A significant drop of platelets requiring the discontinuation of heparin was observed, however, in three patients, but their platelet count consistently remained >150 10⁹/L. Our study demonstrates that the induction of antibodies to H-PF4 is a frequent phenomenon in patients treated with UH or with LMWH. The absence of thrombocytopenia and of clinical complications in these patients demonstrates that other conditions must be associated with H-PF4 antibodies for inducing type II HIT: optimal concentrations of heparin and PF4 in the blood circulation to allow the formation of macromolecular H-PF4 complexes, presence of activated platelets that present an increased binding of H-PF4 complexes, increased expression of FcγRIIA receptors, or presence of their H 131 phenotype. We conclude that the measurement of antibodies to H-PF4 complexes allows the detection of heparin-treated patients at risk of developing type II HIT. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Platelet factor 4 binds to bacteria, [corrected] inducing antibodies cross-reacting with the major antigen in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

A clinically important adverse drug reaction, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), is induced by antibodies specific for complexes of the chemokine platelet factor 4 (PF4) and the polyanion heparin. Even heparin-naive patients can generate anti-PF4/heparin IgG as early as day 4 of heparin treatment, suggesting preimmunization by antigens mimicking PF4/heparin complexes. These antibodies probably result from bacterial infections, as (1) PF4 bound charge-dependently to various bacteria, (2) human heparin-induced anti-PF4/heparin antibodies cross-reacted with PF4-coated Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, and (3) mice developed anti-PF4/heparin antibodies during polymicrobial sepsis without heparin application. Thus, after binding to bacteria, the endogenous protein PF4 induces antibodies with specificity for PF4/polyanion complexes. These can target a large variety of PF4-coated bacteria and enhance bacterial phagocytosis in vitro. The same antigenic epitopes are expressed when pharmacologic heparin binds to platelets augmenting formation of PF4 complexes. Boosting of preformed B cells by PF4/heparin complexes could explain the early occurrence of IgG antibodies in HIT. We also found a continuous, rather than dichotomous, distribution of anti-PF4/heparin IgM and IgG serum concentrations in a cross-sectional population study (n = 4029), indicating frequent preimmunization to modified PF4. PF4 may have a role in bacterial defense, and HIT is probably a misdirected antibacterial host defense mechanism.     

C-reactive protein induces human peripheral blood monocytes to synthesize tissue factor

The acute inflammatory response is frequently accompanied by serious thrombotic events. We show that C-reactive protein (CRP), an acute- phase reactant that markedly increases its serum concentration in response to inflammatory stimuli, induced monocytes to express tissue factor (TF), a potent procoagulant. Purified human CRP in concentrations commonly achieved in vivo during inflammation (10 to 100 micrograms/mL) induced a 75-fold increase in TF procoagulant activity (PCA) of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBM), with a parallel increase in TF antigen levels. CRP-induced PCA was completely blocked by a monoclonal antibody against human TF but not by irrelevant murine IgG. Dot blot analysis showed a significant increase of TF mRNA after 4 hours of incubation with CRP, followed by a peak of PCA within 6 and 8 hours. Actinomycin D and cycloheximide blocked CRP-stimulated PCA, suggesting that de novo TF protein synthesis was required. Endotoxin (LPS) contamination of CRP was excluded as the mediator of TF synthesis because: (1) CRP was Limulus assay negative; (2) induction of TF PCA by CRP was not blocked by Polymyxin B, in contrast to LPS- induced PCA; (3) antihuman CRP IgG inhibited CRP-induced PCA, but not LPS-induced PCA; (4) CRP was able to stimulate TF production in LPS- pretreated PBM refractory to additional LPS stimulation; and, (5) unlike LPS, CRP was incapable of inducing TF in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. We suggest that CRP-mediated TF production in monocytes may contribute to the development of disseminated intravascular coagulation and thrombosis in inflammatory states.     

Further characterization of antibody and antigen in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Patients with immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) possess antibodies that bind to a complex of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. We observed that HIT antibodies will also bind to PF4 alone adsorbed on polystyrene ELISA wells but not to soluble PF4 in the absence of heparin. Having developed a technique to affinity-purify anti-PF4-heparin HIT IgG, we are able to provide the first estimates of the avidity of HIT IgG. HIT IgG displayed relatively high functional affinity for both PF4-heparin (Kd = 7-30 nM) and polystyrene adsorbed PF4 alone (Kd = 20-70 nM). Furthermore, agarose beads coated with PF4 alone were almost as effective as beads coated with PF4 plus heparin in depleting HIT plasmas of anti-PF4-heparin antibodies. We conclude that the HIT antibodies which bind to polystyrene adsorbed PF4 without heparin are largely the same IgG molecules that bind PF4-heparin and therefore most HIT antibodies bind epitope(s) on PF4 and not epitope(s) formed by part of a PF4 molecule and part of a heparin molecule. Binding of PF4 to heparin (optimal) or polystyrene/agarose (suboptimal) promotes recognition of this epitope.     

Anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies in orthopedic surgery patients receiving antithrombotic prophylaxis with fondaparinux or enoxaparin

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by platelet-activating IgG antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4) bound to heparin. Immunogenicity of heparins differs in that unfractionated heparin (UFH) induces more anti-PF4/heparin antibodies than low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and UFH also causes more HIT. Fondaparinux, a synthetic anticoagulant modeled after the antithrombin-binding pentasaccharide, is believed to be nonimmunogenic. We tested 2726 patients for anti-PF4/heparin antibodies after they were randomized to receive antithrombotic prophylaxis with fondaparinux or LMWH (enoxaparin) following hip or knee surgery. We also evaluated in vitro cross-reactivity of the IgG antibodies generated against PF4 in the presence of UFH, LMWH, danaparoid, or fondaparinux. We found that anti-PF4/heparin antibodies were generated at similar frequencies in patients treated with fondaparinux or enoxaparin. Although antibodies reacted equally well in vitro against PF4/UFH and PF4/LMWH, and sometimes weakly against PF4/danaparoid, none reacted against PF4/fondaparinux, including even those sera obtained from patients who formed antibodies during fondaparinux treatment. At high concentrations, however, fondaparinux inhibited binding of HIT antibodies to PF4/polysaccharide, indicating that PF4/fondaparinux interactions occur. No patient developed HIT. We conclude that despite similar immunogenicity of fondaparinux and LMWH, PF4/fondaparinux, but not PF4/LMWH, is recognized poorly by the antibodies generated, suggesting that the risk of HIT with fondaparinux likely is very low.     

Beneficial effect of exogenous platelet factor 4 for detecting pathogenic heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia antibodies

The laboratory diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is based on an enzyme immunoassay combined with a functional test, and serotonin release assay (SRA) is the gold standard for detecting activating HIT antibodies. However, a recent atypical history of HIT prompted us to evaluate whether addition of platelet factor 4 (PF4) during SRA could improve its ability to detect pathogenic HIT antibodies. Using 5B9, a monoclonal antibody to PF4/H with a human Fc fragment, we first defined the optimal PF4 concentration for detecting low amounts of platelet‐activating IgG with SRA. Plasma samples from 50 patients with suspected HIT were then studied, and SRA was positive in 17 cases (Group SRA^pos), with relatively high levels of PF4‐specific IgG (median optical density = 2·66). SRA was also systematically performed after adding 10 μg/ml of PF4 in the reaction mixture, and significant serotonin release was measured with samples from 9 additional patients (Group PF4‐SRA^pos). Importantly, levels of PF4‐specific IgG were similar in these samples and those from the 24 persistently SRA negative patients. Moreover, the pre‐test probability of HIT was intermediate/high in all ‘SRA^pos’ or ‘SRA‐PF4^pos’ patients. In conclusion, addition of exogenous PF4 might improve the detection of pathogenic HIT antibodies by SRA.     

The unique immunological features of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious drug reaction that leads to a decrease in platelet count and a high risk of thrombosis. HIT patients produce pathogenic immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies that bind to complexes of platelet factor‐4 (PF4) and heparin. HIT immune complexes crosslink Fc‐receptors resulting in platelet and monocyte activation. These events lead to the release of procoagulant chemokines and tissue factor, which together create an intensely prothrombotic state. HIT represents an atypical immune response because it has features of both T cell‐dependent and T cell‐independent mechanisms. The disorder is characterized by newly formed anti‐PF4/heparin IgG antibodies, which are characteristic of a T cell‐dependent mechanism; however, re‐exposure to heparin, months after HIT, does not lead to a memory response, which is consistent with a T cell‐independent mechanism. In this review, we discuss the immunobiological events that can explain these features, including the role for T cell‐dependent and T cell‐independent mechanisms in HIT antibody generation, the immunogenic characteristics of the PF4/heparin antigen, and the concept of a temporary loss in immune regulation contributing to the onset of HIT. We also present a novel immunobiological model to explain the atypical immune response that is characteristic of HIT.     

Serum antibodies to the heparin/platelet factor 4 complex are an independent predictor of thrombotic complications following pediatric fontan surgery

Antibodies to the heparin/platelet factor 4 complex (heparin/PF4) are linked to the pathogenesis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and to the thrombotic complications. We investigated thrombotic events during early follow-up in a pediatric cardiac surgical population to ascertain whether there is a relation between heparin/PF4 antibody concentration and post-surgical thrombotic complications. One hundred and five consecutive pediatric patients treated by Fontan surgery were studied. The presence of serum heparin/PF4 immunoglobulins IgG, IgA, and IgM (collectively termed HIT antibodies) were measured in preoperative and postoperative blood samples by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. On day six after Fontan surgery, HIT-related thromboses was identified in total of 11 patients (10.5%). HIT antibodies were detected in 34 of 105 patients (32.4%). The post-surgical nadir platelet count was significantly lower in patients who developed antibodies (p < 0.001). We found the odds ratio (OR) for this composite endpoint was 4.06 (p < 0.001). Seropositive status for heparin/PF4 antibodies was an independent predictor of thrombotic events (OR 2.28; p < 0.001). Quintile analysis revealed that the median nadir platelet value was significantly lower in patients with higher HIT antibody titers. Patients in the highest quintile of HIT antibody titer all experienced thrombotic events, while only two thrombotic events occurred in patients in the lowest quintile (p < 0.001). Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a rare occurrence in pediatric cardiac surgical patients. Patients who develop antibodies to the heparin/PF4 complex have a significantly higher rate of postoperative thrombotic events than patients who lack these antibodies. Within the seropositive group, the risk of developing thrombosis increased with the plasma antibody concentration.     

The homozygous FcgammaRIIIa-158V genotype is a risk factor for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with antibodies to heparin-platelet factor 4 complexes

We hypothesized that Fcgamma receptor IIIa (FcgammaRIIIa), a polymorphic receptor for the Fc portion of immunoglobulin G (IgG) other than FcgammaRIIa, was involved in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). FcgammaRIIa-131 and FcgammaRIIIa-158 genotypes were determined in 102 patients with definite HIT and in 2 control groups of patients treated by heparin (86 subjects without detectable antibodies [Abs] to heparin-platelet factor 4 [H/PF4], Ab(-) group; 84 patients with Abs to H/PF4 without HIT, Ab(+) group). There were no significant differences in genotype distribution or allele frequencies between the 3 groups for FcgammaRIIa-131H/R polymorphism. In contrast, FcgammaRIIIa-158V homozygotes were more frequent in the HIT group than in the Ab(+) group (P = .02), a difference that was more pronounced in patients with high levels of anti-H/PF4 Abs (P = .01). Since anti-H/PF4 Abs are mainly IgG1 and IgG3, clearance of sensitized platelets may be increased in patients homozygous for the FcgammaRIIIa-158V allotype, thus contributing to the development of thrombocytopenia.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: new evidence for the dynamic binding of purified anti-PF4-heparin antibodies to platelets and the resultant platelet activation

Immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is associated with antibodies directed against a complex of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. We were able to affinity purify anti-PF4-heparin IgG (HIT IgG) from the plasma of 2 patients with HIT. Under conditions that were more physiological and sensitive than those in previous studies, we observed that this HIT IgG caused platelet aggregation on the addition of heparin. Platelets activated with HIT IgG increased their release and surface expression of PF4. We quantitated, for the first time, the binding of affinity-purified HIT iodine 125-IgG to platelets as they activated in a plasma milieu. Binding of the HIT IgG was dependent on heparin and required some degree of platelet activation. Blocking the platelet FcgammaRII with the monoclonal antibody IV.3 did not prevent HIT IgG binding to activated platelets. We concluded that anti-PF4-heparin IgG is the component in these HIT plasmas that induces platelet aggregation. The Fab region of HIT IgG binds to PF4-heparin on the surface of activated platelets. We propose that only then does the Fc portion of the bound IgG further activate the same or adjacent platelets through the Fc receptor. Our data support a dynamic model of platelet activation in which released PF4 enhances further antibody binding and more release.     

Platelet-activating anti-PF4 disorders: An overview

Platelet factor 4 (PF4) is a highly cationic tetrameric protein that can be targeted by platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies of immunoglobulin G (IgG) class. Certain features of PF4, including its multivalent nature (duplicate antigen sites per tetramer), the ability of many PF4 tetramers to undergo close approximation through charge neutralization, and the dimeric binding of IgG molecules, results in formation of IgG-containing immune complexes in situ on platelets, neutrophils, and monocytes, resulting in Fcγ receptor-mediated pancellular activation that also activates hemostasis (potential for disseminated intravascular coagulation). This review discusses 4 anti-PF4 disorders: classic heparin-induced thrombocytopenia ([HIT]; triggered by heparin and certain other polyanionic pharmaceuticals, featuring predominantly heparin-dependent antibodies), autoimmune HIT (aHIT; severe subtype of HIT that features both heparin-dependent and heparin-independent platelet-activating antibodies), and spontaneous HIT (non-heparin triggers such as knee replacement surgery and infection; predominantly heparin-independent platelet-activating antibodies). Most recently, a novel fourth anti-PF4 disorder, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), was identified as an ultrarare complication of adenovirus vector vaccines. VITT is characterized by thrombocytopenia, disseminated intravascular coagulation, a high frequency of thrombosis—including in unusual sites (cerebral veins, splanchnic veins)—and highly pathogenic anti-PF4 antibodies with heparin-independent platelet-activating properties.     

Platelet factor 4 triggers thrombo-inflammation by bridging innate and adaptive immunity

Platelet factor 4 (PF4, synonym: CXCL4) is an evolutionary old chemokine with proposed roles in hemostasis and antimicrobial defense. In addition, PF4 has attracted considerable attention as a crucial mediator of one of the most prothrombotic adverse drug effects affecting blood cells, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Interest in PF4 substantially increased in 2021 when it was identified as the target antigen in the life-threatening adverse effect, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). We address the concept that a major biological function of PF4—a strongly cationic chemokine—is to bind to negatively-charged prokaryotic microorganisms, resulting in structural changes in PF4 that trigger a danger signal recognized by the adaptive immune system. Application of biophysical tools has provided substantial insights into the molecular mechanisms by which PF4 becomes immunogenic, providing insights into a new mechanism of autoimmunity. Binding of autoantibodies with high affinity induces conformational change(s) in the endogenous protein, which are then recognized as foreign antigen, as exemplified by the prothrombotic disorders, autoimmune HIT and VITT. The final part of our review summarizes current assays for HIT and VITT, explaining how structural aspects of anti-PF4 pathobiology relate to assay design and performance characteristics. Currently, functional (platelet activation) assays using washed platelets detect HIT antibodies when heparin is added, and VITT antibodies when PF4 is added. Solid-phase PF4-dependent immunoassays using microtiter plates are sensitive for both HIT and VITT antibodies, while rapid immunoassays, in which the PF4/heparin antigen is coated on beads, are sensitive and specific for HIT, but not for VITT antibodies.     

Incidence and clinical significance of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies of the IgG, IgM, and IgA class in 755 consecutive patient samples referred for diagnostic testing for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is usually caused by anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies, leading to intravascular platelet activation. These antibodies can be detected by PF4/polyanion antigen assays or platelet activation assays. While antigen assays are very sensitive and recognize immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgA, and IgM antibodies, the role of IgM and IgA HIT-antibodies is debated. Platelet activation assays recognize IgG and are more specific for clinical HIT. METHODS: We analyzed sera from 755 consecutive patients referred for diagnostic testing for HIT using a PF4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for IgG, IgA, and IgM and by the heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) test. Clinical information was provided by the treating physicians. RESULTS: A total of 108 of 755 (14.3%) patients tested positive, 105 (13.9%) in the PF4/heparin IgG/A/M ELISA [28 (26.7%) only for IgM/A]; 53 (7.0%) sera were positive in the HIPA, of those 50 tested also positive in the ELISA. In 77 patients sufficient clinical information was provided. Available clinical information for 17 of the 28 patients who had only IgM and/or IgA detected showed plausible alternative (non-HIT) explanations in four of seven who had thromboembolic complications and in nine of 10 who had isolated HIT. CONCLUSION: Detection of IgG, IgM and IgA class antibodies by PF4/heparin ELISA yields a positive test result about twice as often as does a platelet activation assay, with only a minority of the additional patients detected likely having HIT. Thus, there is a potential for considerable over-diagnosis of HIT by laboratories that utilize only an ELISA for diagnostic testing.