Nedocromil sodium is more potent than sodium cromoglycate against AMP-induced bronchoconstriction in atopic asthmatic subjects

Nedocromil sodium is a new chemical entity which shows similar properties to sodium cromoglycate (SCG) and in addition exhibits a preferential activity in stabilizing mucosal mast cells. We have compared the effect of inhalation of nebulized placebo, SCG and nedocromil sodium on the bronchoconstrictor response to inhaled adenosine monophosphate (AMP) in eight atopic asthmatic subjects aged 25 yr (range 21-32 yr). The geometric mean provocation doses of AMP required to produce a 20% decrease in FEV1 (PD20FEV1) and a 40% decrease in Vmax30 (PD40 Vmax30) following placebo were 4.9 (0.3-14.2) and 1.8 (0.1-8.4) mumol respectively. Prior inhalation of both SCG and nedocromil sodium significantly inhibited the bronchoconstrictor response to AMP with PD20FEV1s of 36.6 (4.0-132.7) and 134 (12.4-560), and PD40 Vmax30 values of 20.5 (1.4-110) and 101.6 (5-560) mumol respectively (P less than 0.001). Nedocromil sodium was 3.9 (FEV1) and 8.0 (Vmax30) times more potent than SCG (P less than 0.001). In conclusion, both drugs inhibit the bronchoconstrictor response to inhaled AMP, and nedocromil is at least 4-8 times more potent than SCG.     

A comparative study of the effects of two different doses of nedocromil sodium and placebo given by pressurised aerosol in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Fourteen adult subjects with stable asthma were treated using a double-blind crossover, randomised protocol, with either nedocromil sodium (4 mg or 2 mg) or placebo. The agents were administered from matched pressurised aerosol inhalers 30 min before exposure to an exercise regimen which, on a previous screening day, resulted in a 24–53% (mean: 33.9%) decrease in peak expiratory flow (PEF). Both doses of nedocromil sodium were significantly superior to placebo in preventing the exercise-induced decrease in PEF and were without side effects. This study confirms and extends the results of earlier trials with nedocromil sodium and further supports the contention that this new agent may be of benefit in the treatment of reversible obstructive airways disease in the adult patient.     

The effect of nedocromil sodium on the bronchoconstrictor effect of neurokinin A in subjects with asthma

We have previously demonstrated that the neuropeptide, neurokinin A (NKA) (substance K), causes bronchoconstriction in subjects with asthma. In a double-blind, crossover study we investigated the effect of nedocromil sodium on NKA-induced bronchoconstriction in subjects with asthma. Twelve patients with mild asthma (mean FEV1 percent predicted +/- SE, 87.3 +/- 3.4) inhaled on 2 separate days either nedocromil sodium, 4 mg, or placebo, as two puffs from a metered-dose aerosol, 30 minutes before challenge with NKA. NKA was inhaled at three concentrations (10(-7), 3.10(-7), and 10(-6) mol/ml). The specific airway conductance (SGaw) and FEV1 were measured before and 5 and 15 minutes after each concentration step. On the placebo-treatment day, NKA caused a concentration-dependent decrease in SGaw and FEV1 (mean log for the provocative concentration of NKA causing a 35% fall in SGaw [10(-7) mol/ml], 0.49; mean log for the provocative concentration of NKA causing a 15% fall in SGaw [10(-7) mol/ml], 0.90). The inhalation of 4 mg of nedocromil sodium reduced the decrease in both SGaw and FEV1. The maximal percentage decrease in SGaw on the nedocromil sodium-treatment day was 27 +/- 5.2 (versus placebo, 53.3 +/- 5.4; p less than 0.05), and the maximal percentage decrease in FEV1 was 5.5 +/- 1.4 (versus placebo, 12.4 +/- 2.3; p less than 0.05). The dose-response curves for NKA after nedocromil sodium treatment were significantly shifted to the right compared to the curve after placebo-treatment. We conclude that nedocromil sodium protects against NKA-induced bronchoconstriction in subjects with asthma.     

Effect of nedocromil sodium on the late asthmatic reaction to bronchial antigen challenge

The effect of inhaled nedocromil sodium (4 mg by pressurized aerosol) on the dual asthmatic reaction to bronchial antigen challenge was studied in eight patients with asthma. The following prechallenge/postchallenge treatment combinations were administered: nedocromil sodium/placebo, nedocromil sodium/nedocromil sodium, placebo/nedocromil sodium, and placebo/placebo. Each patient received three treatment combinations assigned with a balanced incomplete block design. Nedocromil sodium administered before antigen challenge was significantly more effective than placebo in blocking both the early (p less than 0.001) and late (p less than 0.01) fall in FEV1. Postchallenge administration of nedocromil sodium tended to delay the onset of late asthmatic reaction but did not provide significant protection compared to placebo. These results demonstrated that nedocromil sodium prevents both phases of the dual asthmatic reaction to bronchial antigen provocation when it is inhaled before challenge. Further investigation is necessary to elicit a definite answer to whether nedocromil sodium administered after bronchial challenge has an effect on late asthmatic reaction.     

Effects of adding nedocromil sodium (Tilade®) to the routine therapy of patients with bronchial asthma

In a 12-week double-blind, group comparative trial, preceded by a 2-week baseline period, 38 asthmatic subjects of mixed aetiology and varying severity received either 4 mg nedocromil sodium by metered dose inhaler twice a day or a matching placebo preparation, in addition to their existing maintenance therapy of inhaled corticosteroids plus inhaled bronchodilators. Asthma severity and lung function were assessed at 4-weekly clinic visits, and symptomatology (morning tightness, daytime asthma, cough, night-time asthma), morning, afternoon and evening PEFR, and the use of inhaled bronchodilators were recorded on daily diary cards. Treatment with nedocromil sodium led to significant (P less than 0.05) improvements in clinic assessment of FEV1 and PEFR both before and after an inhaled bronchodilator from at least the eighth week onwards. Mid-study FVC was also significantly (P less than 0.05) improved. Daily PEFR increased throughout the study in the nedocromil sodium-treated subjects and the diurnal variation was reduced. Daily symptom severity was also reduced and these improvements occurred despite the similar or slightly reduced use of inhaled bronchodilators. However, none of these improvements in diary card parameters reached statistical significance. By the final week of the study subjects treated with nedocromil sodium predominantly had a mild form of asthma or no symptoms at all, and both patients and clinicians reported the effectiveness of nedocromil sodium; the subjects but not the clinicians finding it significantly more effective (P less than 0.05) than placebo. Nedocromil sodium was well tolerated although one patient was withdrawn owing to a persistent sore throat after 7 weeks of treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Clinical Experience with Tilavist: An Overview of Efficacy and Safety

A programme of clinical studies was carried out to determine the basic efficacy and safety of 2% nedocromil sodium eye drops (Tilavist) in treating allergic conjunctivitis, in 2,905 patients from 3–76 years of age. Results of all the double-masked placebo comparative studies completed to date - five in vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC), five in perennial (PAC) and 16 in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC) - have been assessed in a statistical overview analysis. Nedocromil sodium, administered four times daily to 153 patients with VKC, was significantly more effective than placebo (155 patients) and in the clinicians' opinion gave good control in 76% of cases, compared with 46% for placebo (p < 0.001). Patients with chronic symptoms of PAC also responded better to nedocromil sodium given four times daily (n = 146) rather than twice daily (n = 86), and significantly more patients (p < 0.001) were effectively controlled by four times daily treatment with nedocromil sodium (72%) than with placebo (47%; n= 156). Twice-daily dosage with nedocromil sodium (n = 677) was adequate for SAC, however, and the treatment was statistically better than placebo (p < 0.01-p < 0.001) whether dosed twice or four times daily. Speed of action was assessed in seven SAC studies in which 79% of all patients (n = 295) using nedocromil sodium had experienced relief of symptoms when questioned, half of them within 15 minutes and 74% during the first hour after dosing. Test treatments were well-accepted by both adults and children, and there were no major adverse events. Minor irritations reported more frequently with nedocromil sodium than placebo were stinging or burning of the eyes on application of the drops and a distinctive taste, noted by 5% of the active treatment group (n = 1,552).     

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy of nedocromil sodium in the management of childhood grass-pollen asthma

The aim of this double-blind placebo-controlled trial was to assess the efficacy and tolerance of nedocromil sodium at a dose of 4 mg four times daily, in the management of children suffering from grass-pollen asthma. Thirty-one children suffering from seasonal asthma (24 boys and seven girls, aged 4-21 yr, mean 11 yr) were enrolled in the study during the 1988 pollen season. Only one child was aged 4 yr, and she was a cooperative girl able to use the metered dose inhaler properly. In addition, in each group there was a patient aged 20 and 21 years, respectively, who had been followed up by us since childhood. Treatments were delivered by pressurized aerosol over a period of 4 weeks following a 1-week baseline, during which patients were required to show active disease by obtaining a minimum symptom score (almost 2 points of severity score on at least 3 days of the baseline period). The patients were randomly assigned to both treatment groups, all were taking inhaled or oral bronchodilators, when necessary. Twenty-nine patients completed the trial, 16 in the nedocromil sodium treatment group and 13 in the placebo group. One child of each group was withdrawn due to treatment failure. Statistically significant differences in favour of nedocromil sodium were found regarding morning tightness and mean morning PEFR values on diary cards (P less than 0.01 and P less than 0.05, respectively), bronchodilator usage (P less than 0.05), pulmonary function tests (PFT) at clinic visits (P less than 0.05), and in parents' opinion (P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The long-term effect of nedocromil sodium on the maximal degree of airway narrowing to methacholine in atopic asthmatic subjects

Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma is characterized by increased airway sensitivity and by excessive maximal airway narrowing. Long-term inhalation therapy with nedocromil sodium has been shown to reduce increased airway sensitivity in asthma. However, it is unknown whether it also attenuates excessive airway narrowing. We studied the long-term effects of nedocromil on the maximal degree of airway narrowing to methacholine. Twenty-seven atopic asthmatic adults (21-39 years), with a measurable maximal-response plateau on the dose-response curve (20-55% fall in FEV1), were randomly allocated into two parallel treatment groups. They received either inhaled nedocromil 4 mg q.i.d. or placebo, for 8 weeks following a 2 week baseline period. Every 2 weeks, complete dose-response curves to inhaled methacholine were obtained. The response was measured by FEV1 and by volume history standardized partial expiratory flow-volume curves (V40p). A maximal-response plateau was considered if three or more of the highest data points fell within a 5% response range, the maximal response being the average value on the plateau (MFEV1, MV40p). Airway sensitivity was defined as the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20FEV1) or 40% fall in V40p (PC40 V40p). Twenty-four subjects completed the study. Baseline FEV1 or V40p did not change during either treatment (P greater than 0.07). There were no significant changes in MFEV1 or MV40p during treatment with nedocromil (P greater than 0.07). Neither were these changes significantly different between the two groups (P greater than 0.25).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparative study of the effects of nedocromil sodium (4 mg) and sodium cromoglycate (10 mg) on adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects

The effect of nedocromil sodium (4 mg; 7.8 × 10⁻⁶ m ) on adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction was compared with that of a higher dose of sodium cromoglycate (10 mg; 24.1 × 10⁻⁶ m ). Eleven allergic asthmatic patients (mean age 26.28 ± 12.21 years) were studied. Adenosine (0.03–4.00 mg) was administered as nebulized aerosol. The dose of adenosine producing a 20% change in FEV₁(PD₂₀) was calculated from the individual semi-logarithmic dose-response curves. Patients were studied on 4 separate days. On the first day the adenosine challenge was performed; on subsequent days patients were pretreated (20 min before challenge) with either placebo or test drug (nedocromil sodium 2 × 2 mg or sodium cromoglycate 2 × 5 mg) administered by pressurized aerosol in a randomized, double-blind manner. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way analysis of variance. Neither sodium cromoglycate nor nedocromil sodium showed a significant bronchodilator effect. In patients treated with placebo, inhalation of adenosine produced a dose-related bronchoconstriction with a geometric mean PD₂₀ of 0.42 mg. After drug administration the mean PD₂₀ values were 1.29 mg with sodium cromoglycate and 2.30 mg with nedocromil sodium. Both drugs produced a significant increase in mean PD₂₀ value in comparison with placebo and baseline ( P < 0.01). These results demonstrate that nedocromil sodium (4 mg) is significantly more potent than a larger dose of sodium cromoglycate (10 mg) in inhibiting adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction ( P < 0.05).     

The effect of nedocromil sodium on the early and late reaction and allergen-induced bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to methacholine was studied in 14 patients with asthma and five healthy control subjects, with and without pretreatment with nedocromil sodium, 3 and 24 hours after allergen challenge. Eleven patients demonstrated a dual asthmatic response. A significant decrease in the provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 was found from a geometric mean starting value of 1.18 mg/ml on the control day to 0.24 mg/ml (p less than 0.001) and to 0.17 mg/ml (p less than 0.001) 3 and 24 hours after allergen challenge. A significant correlation was observed between the increased BHR at 3 hours and the magnitude of the late response (r = -0.57; p less than 0.05). Nedocromil sodium (6 mg) significantly inhibited the increase in BHR, 1 mg/ml (p less than 0.001) at 3 hours and 0.50 mg/ml (p less than 0.001) at 24 hours. Nedocromil sodium shifted the severity of the early allergic reaction (EAR) from mean -34.8% to -6.9% and inhibited the later allergic reaction (LAR) from -30.5% to +0.4% (p less than 0.005). From the study can be concluded that nedocromil sodium inhibits the EAR and LAR and the allergen-induced increase in BHR. The inhibitory effect of nedocromil sodium on the LAR may be related to its ability to inhibit the increased BHR before the development of the LAR.     

Double-blind group comparative study of 2% nedocromil sodium eye drops with placebo eye drops in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis

A multicenter double-blind group comparative study was carried out in 126 patients, 64 of whom received 2% nedocromil sodium eye drops, and 62 placebo eyedrops twice each day for the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis to birch pollen. The patients were evaluated at 2 week intervals for clinical signs of conjunctivitis and kept daily diary records of eye symptoms (0-4 severity scales) and concomitant therapy. Diary trends favored active treatment, and reached significance for excessive lacrimation (P less than .05) during peak pollen challenge. Clinic assessments showed the same directional trend and final opinions of treatment efficacy were significantly in favor of nedocromil sodium (P = .003, patients; P = .006, clinicians). In addition, the placebo group used significantly more topical (P less than .05) and oral (P less than .01) concomitant antihistamine therapy. Nedocromil sodium and placebo treatments were equally acceptable and well tolerated. The results show that 2% nedocromil sodium used topically twice each day is an effective therapy for seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.     

A comparison of the effects of sodium cromoglycate and beclomethasone dipropionate on pulmonary function and bronchial hyperreactivity in subjects with asthma

After a run-in period of 2 weeks, receiving a regimen of inhaled beta 2-agonists and/or theophyllines, 38 atopic patients with asthma with perennial symptoms were randomly allocated to receive an 8-week treatment of additional inhalation treatment with either sodium cromoglycate (SCG), 2 mg four times daily, and placebo beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), or BDP, 200 micrograms twice daily, and placebo SCG. After crossover, each group received the opposite treatment for the final 8 weeks. FEV1, FVC, and provocation concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) were determined monthly and peak expiratory flow (PEF) daily throughout the study. A significant increase in FEV1, FVC, and PEF (p less than 0.01) was observed after BDP treatment was started, and likewise, in the second period, an increase in both FEV1 and PEF (p less than 0.05) was observed. The total effect on logarithm-natural (Ln) (PC20), i.e., the mean effects of the two periods, was also significant (p less than 0.01). SCG, however, was most effective when it was used as the first drug, indicated by a significant increase in FVC in the first period (p less than 0.05). Neither in the first nor in the second period did SCG treatment influence the Ln (PC20) value positively, and the SCG treatment administered in the second period could not maintain the improvement in the pulmonary function (i.e., FEV1, FVC, and PEF) obtained initially with the BDP treatment. When the effect of BDP on FEV1, FVC, PEF, and Ln (PC20) was compared to the effect of SCG in the first 8-week treatment period, no significant difference was observed (p greater than 0.1).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of effect of nedocromil sodium on clinical and inflammatory parameters of asthma in children allergic to dust mite

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical effect of nedocromil sodium and its relationship with serum levels of inflammatory mediators by monitoring lung function and noninvasive markers of airway inflammation, such as eosinophil blood counts; serum ECP, sIL-2R, IL-4 and sICAM; and total IgE. Anti-inflammatory medications cause a reduction in the markers of airway inflammation, decrease the intensity of airway hyperresponsiveness, and improve clinical symptoms of asthma. Among the available choices is nedocromil sodium, which is favored in the treatment of asthmatic children due to its very mild side-effects. It has been previously shown to improve the clinical parameters of asthma, but there are limited data on its effect on inflammatory mediators in the serum of asthmatic children. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled 8-week trial, 39 children, aged 9-16 years, with moderate atopic asthma were randomly allocated to receive either nedocromil sodium, two puffs twice daily, 0.002 g/puff, or placebo, two puffs twice daily. The primary end points were the clinical parameters of asthma measured by asthma symptom score, FEV1, and PC20H. Other end points included the serum levels of various inflammatory markers - ECP, sIL-2R, IL-4, sICAM, and IgE. RESULTS: Clinical and inflammatory parameters improved with the use of nedocromil sodium, compared with placebo. Nedocromil significantly decreased serum levels of inflammatory markers, as shown in the following table. No correlation was found between any of the measured parameters. CONCLUSION: Nedocromil sodium provided effective anti-inflammatory treatment for children with moderate atopic asthma.     

The effect of intranasal nedocromil sodium on viral upper respiratory tract infections in human volunteers

Two studies involving double-blind group comparative trials in human volunteers compared the effects of intranasal nedocromil sodium (2.6 mg active drug per nostril, q.i.d.) with placebo on clinical symptoms and performance impairment associated with the common cold. In the first study volunteers were challenged with rhinoviruses (RV9 and RV14), and in the second study with respiratory coronavirus. In both studies, active and placebo groups of volunteers were demographically similar. Infection rates in both groups were also similar. There were no withdrawals resulting from unusual symptoms related to either treatment. In the rhinovirus study (19, placebo; 20, nedocromil sodium) daily symptom scores and daily mean nasal secretion weights were significantly lower in the nedocromil sodium-treated group. In the coronavirus study (26, placebo; 27, nedocromil sodium) there was little difference in the severity of colds between the active and placebo-treated groups, but trends favoured nedocromil sodium. In both studies the impairment of performance in volunteers who developed a cold was significantly less in those treated with nedocromil sodium than in those treated with placebo.     

Effect of nedocromil on antigen-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects

Nedocromil sodium, a pyranoquinoline decarboxylic acid derivative, is a new antiasthma compound undergoing clinical investigation. It has been shown to be effective in the management of asthma and to attenuate exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in 12 ragweed-sensitive subjects known to respond to inhaled ragweed antigen. On two study days, four to ten days apart, ragweed challenges were performed using a standard protocol 30 minutes after a single dose (two puffs of 2 mg/puff) of either active drug or placebo. The PD20 (20% fall in FEV1) for each treatment day was compared by parametric and nonparametric 2-period crossover analyses. Baseline FEV1 pre-drug and post-drug administration did not differ significantly between study days. On the nedocromil day, the mean +/- SD for log PD20 was 2.25 +/- 0.561 and on the placebo day, 1.73 +/- 1.048 (P = 0.04). There were no side effects associated with either treatment. These results demonstrate that nedocromil is effective in shifting the stimulus response curve to inhaled antigen in some ragweed-sensitive subjects. Its wide spectrum of efficacy against bronchoprovocation suggests it is useful in the treatment of hyperreactive airway disorders.     

Steroid sparing effect of nedocromil sodium in asthmatic patients on high doses of inhaled steroids

Nedocromil sodium is a non-steroidal prophylactic agent developed for the management of asthma. We have assessed the steroid sparing potential of inhaled nedocromil sodium 4 mg four limes daily in a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study in 69 asthmatic subjects controlled on inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate in the dose range 1000 2000 μg daily. Following a 4 week run-in period subjects added nedocromil sodium or placebo by metered dose inhaler to their usual medication for a further 4 weeks. The dose of inhaled steroid was then reduced at fortnightly intervals according to a predetermined schedule, with monitoring of asthma severity, symptom scores, bronchodilator use and peak flow recordings. Sixty subjects entered the steroid reduction phase and achieved median (range) % decreases in steroid dose of 80 (17-100)% with nedocromil sodium compared to 65 (0-100)% with placebo (P = 0.34) with 14 patients in the nedocromil sodium group and 10 in the placebo group being withdrawn completely from inhaled steroids. Subjective global assessment scores were significantly better with nedocromil sodium (mean 2.14) than with placebo (2.93; P<0.02) though there was no difference between individual daily symptom scores. In this study therefore in asthmatic patients controlled on high doses of inhaled steroids, nedocromil sodium was well tolerated but the smalt differences in steroid sparing effect between nedocromil and placebo were not statistically significant.     

Treatment of Acute Bronchoconstriction in Children with Use of a Tube Spacer Aerosol and a Dry Powder Inhaler

In a double blind cross-over study 24 children suffering from acute bronchoconstriction were treated with either placebo, or terbutaline delivered by a pressurized aerosol with a tube spacer (TS), or salbutamol from a dry powder inhaler (Rotahaler = RO). Both active treatments resulted in a significant increase in FEV1 as compared with placebo (P less than 0.001). Furthermore, TS treatment resulted in significantly greater improvement in FEV1 than treatment with the RO (P less than 0.05). Under the conditions of marked airways obstruction problems with correct handling of the RO (loading and breaking the capsule) were prevalent and many children were unable to empty the RO capsule. These difficulties seemed to account for the smaller bronchodilation after RO treatment and were not seen under quiet circumstances. It is recommended that inhalation therapy in children is supervised by an adult during periods of marked airways disease.     

Nedocromil sodium 2% eye drops for twice-daily treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: a Swedish multicentre placebo-controlled study in children allergic to birch pollen

This was a multicentre, double-blind, randomized group comparative study in which 77 children, aged 6–16 years, received 2% nedocromil sodium eye drops and 72 received placebo, one drop into each eye twice daily. The treatment period was 4 weeks, covering the peak birch pollen season. Prior to the start or the season, patients who had mended the clinic the previous 2 years because of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC) to birch pollen, entered a one week baseline period during which symptoms were assessed, diary cards completed, and routine sampling of blood and urine earned out. The double-blind treatment period then commenced at the onset of the birch pollen season. Patients parents kept daily diary record cards of eye symptom severity and concomitant therapy. Conjunctivitis was mild in both treatment groups but nedocromil sodium was more effective than placebo in controlling symptoms. During the 2–3 weeks of peak pollen counts, this therapeutic effect was statistically significant for itching (P <0–01), watering (P <0.05) and total symptom score (P <0.01), but was not significant for grittiness (P= 0.08) or redness (P = 0.06). Global opinions of efficacy showed no difference between treatments, due to a high placebo effect (however, the diary card data indicated a significant improvement with nedocromil sodium). We therefore conclude that nedocromil sodium 2% eye drops, administered twice daily, is an effective treatment for SAC in children.     

Mild to moderate asthma affects lung growth in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND: The effect of childhood asthma on lung growth is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To show the effect of mild to moderate childhood asthma on lung growth. METHODS: A total of 1041 children with mild to moderate asthma from the Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) were compared with 5415 children without asthma from the Harvard Six Cities Study (H6CS). Sex-age-specific comparisons of lung growth in CAMP with the H6CS were made by using repeated-measures multiple linear regression models. Sex-age-specific percentages of children with asthma with abnormal (<5th percentile of H6CS) pulmonary function values were calculated. RESULTS: In both boys and girls, the ratio of FEV(1) to forced vital capacity (FVC) was significantly lower for children with than without asthma (P < .001), with corresponding increases for children with asthma in FVC (P < .001). FEV(1) was lower for boys with asthma than for boys without asthma (P < .001), but not for girls (P = .14). Percentages of CAMP children with abnormal FEV(1)/FVC ratios increased with age for both sexes (P < .001). The patterns of lung growth for children with asthma compared with children without asthma did not differ among children treated for 4.3 years with budesonide or nedocromil and placebo during the CAMP trial. CONCLUSION: Mild to moderate asthma results in a pattern of airway obstruction that increases in magnitude from age 5 to 18 years. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Periodic spirometry is needed to monitor children with asthma for signs of increasing airway obstruction with appropriate intervention following national guidelines.     

Two first-line therapies in the treatment of mild asthma: use of peak flow variability as a predictor of effectiveness.

BACKGROUND: New drug evaluations in patients with mild asthma are sometimes complicated by enrollment of patients whose disease is too mild to show improvement with therapy. A peak expiratory flow (PEF) variability criterion may help to more clearly define a mild asthmatic population. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of zafirlukast (20 mg twice daily) and cromolyn sodium (1600 microg four times daily) compared with placebo as first-line therapy for mild asthma using a retrospective analysis, which stratified patients by PEF variability (<10% or > or =10%). STUDY DESIGN: Symptomatic patients (daytime asthma symptoms score > or =8) were randomized to 13 weeks of treatment in a double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 287) were nonsmokers (age > or =12 years) with reversible airway disease, a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of > or = 55% of predicted, and previous treatment with beta2-agonist or theophylline only. Assessments included changes from baseline to endpoint in daytime and nocturnal asthma symptoms, beta2-agonist use, PEF, and FEV1. Response to treatment was assessed by predetermined diary card and FEV1 criteria. Safety was determined from adverse events and laboratory test results. RESULTS: No significant treatment effects were seen across efficacy measures for patients with PEF variability < 10%. For patients with PEF variability > or = 10%, both active treatments significantly (P < .05) decreased the daytime asthma symptoms score, nighttime awakenings, and beta2-agonist use, and increased morning PEF and FEV1 compared with placebo. Response to diary card criteria was 70% and 75% for zafirlukast and cromolyn, respectively; response to FEV1 criteria was 47% for both treatments. All treatments were tolerated well by patients. CONCLUSIONS: Zafirlukast and cromolyn are effective first-line therapies for mild asthma, with both therapies producing greater benefits in patients whose PEF variability was > or = 10%. In prospective trials to evaluate therapies in patients with mild asthma, it may be worthwhile to include PEF variability with a 10% cutoff either as an inclusion criteria or as a tool for subset analysis.