Neue direkt antivirale Medikamente zur Behandlung der chronischen Hepatitis C 2014

Background

The development of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) against the hepatitis C virus (HCV) has seen enormous progress in recent years. In 2011, the first protease inhibitors boceprevir (BOC) and telaprevir (TLV) were approved, which still need to be combined with pegylated interferon α (PEG-IFN α) and ribavirin (RBV) and are used only in patients with genotype 1. With sofosbuvir (SOF) and simeprevir (SMV), two new DAA are available. More DAA are in clinical development.

Objectives

Which changes in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection can be expected with the approval of the new DAA in 2014? Relevant phase IIb and phase III studies for the approval in 2014 were considered for drugs approved by the FDA or EMA at the editorial deadline.

Current data

For patients with genotype 1, the combination of SOF, SMV or faldaprevir with PEG-IFN α and RBV was successfully evaluated in phase III studies. In contrast to previous treatment with PEG-IFN α, RBV and telaprevir (TLV) or boceprevir (BOC), therapy can be shortened in most cases with a significantly improved side-effect profile. Cure rates above 80?% are possible. Data are also available for an interferon-free therapy with either SOF and RBV or SOF and SMV in GT-1 patients. SVR rates exceeding 60?% and up to 90?% are possible. However, treatment experience with these combinations is low and an unrestricted interferon-free therapy for genotype 1 should not be expected before 2015. For patients with genotypes 2 and 3, valid data for interferon-free therapies are available. The combination of SOF and RBV for 12 weeks in genotype 2 and 24 weeks for genotype 3 is effective and shows equal or superior cure rates with fewer side effects than the PEG-IFN α/RBV therapy.

Conclusion

For patients with genotype 1, the duration of therapy can be further reduced with better side effect profile. In certain situations, therapy without PEG-IFN α is possible and should be considered. For patients with genotypes 2 and 3, an interferon-free therapy will be standard of care in 2014.     

High sustained virological response to pegylated interferon and ribavirin for recurrent genotype 3 hepatitis C infection post-liver transplantation

Introduction

Treatment outcomes of recurrent HCV genotype 3 (GT-3) after liver transplantation (LT) are ill-defined.

Aims

To determine efficacy, predictors, and long-term survival after treatment of recurrent HCV GT-3 infection, post-LT, with a combination of pegylated interferon (PEG) and ribavirin (RBV).

Methods

We studied all LT recipients (LTR) in our program treated with PEG and RBV for recurrent HCV GT-3 between Jan 1st 2002 and Dec 31st 2013. Antiviral therapy (AVT) was started if histology showed recurrent HCV with ≥stage2 fibrosis. Treatment was intended for 24 or 36 weeks, depending on early virologic response, and/or 24 weeks consolidation. Primary endpoint was sustained virological response (SVR). We also studied predictors of SVR and long-term patient survival.

Results

Among 492 LT for HCV-related cirrhosis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma performed during the study period, 110 (22 %) had HCV GT-3 infection. Fifty-two (10.5 %) HCV GT-3 patients had indications for AVT. Six were unable to complete the AVT, three because of clinical decompensation and one each because of metastatic disease involving the brain, lung cancer, and ductopenic rejection. Forty-seven (90 %) patients achieved early virological response (EVR) and 37 (71 %) achieved SVR. Predictors of SVR were EVR (p < 0.001), stage ≤3 fibrosis (p = 0.008), and 36 weeks treatment duration (p < 0.001). Less advanced fibrosis ≤3 was independent predictor of SVR (OR 0.18, 95 % CI 0.05–0.67). SVR patients had actuarial (Kaplan–Meier) 1, 3, and 10 year post-treatment survival of 100, 100, and 95 %, compared with 87, 78, and 20 % for non-SVR patients (p < 0.001, log rank test).

Conclusion

Efficacy of AVT for recurrent HCV GT-3 post-LT is high, and comparable with that for non-transplant patients. Less advanced fibrosis is an independent predictor of SVR. SVR improves long-term survival.

     

Impact of hepatitis C virus recombinant form RF1_2k/1b on treatment outcomes within the Georgian national hepatitis C elimination program

Aim

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recombinant form RF1_2k/1b is common in ethnic Georgians. This chimera virus contains genomic fragments of genotype 2 and genotype 1 and is misclassified as genotype 2 by standard genotyping. We aimed to identify RF1_2k/1b strains among genotype 2 patients and assess its impact on treatment outcomes.

Methods

The study included 148 patients with HCV genotype 2 as determined by 5‐untranslated region/core genotyping assay. RF1_2k/1b was identified by sequencing the non‐structural protein 5B region. Patients were treated within the national hepatitis C elimination program with sofosbuvir/ribavirin (SOF/RBV), interferon (IFN)/SOF/RBV, or ledipasvir (LDV)/SOF/RBV.

Results

Of 148 patients, 103 (69.5%) had RF1_ 2k/1b. Sustained virologic response (SVR) data was available for 136 patients (RF1_ 2k/1b, n = 103; genotype 2, n = 33). Sustained virologic response was achieved in more genotype 2 patient than in RF1_2k/1b patients (97.0% vs. 76.7%, P = 0.009). Twelve weeks of LDV/SOF/RBV treatment was highly effective (100% SVR) in both genotypes. Among RF1_2k/1b patients, LDV/SOF/RBV for 12 weeks was superior (100% SVR) to SOF/RBV for 12 weeks (56.4%, P < 0.0001) or 20 weeks (79.2%, P = 0.05). Twelve weeks of IFN/SOF/RBV also showed better response than SOF/RBV for 12 weeks (88.9% vs. 56.4%, P = 0.02) in these patients.

Conclusions

High prevalence of the RF1_2k/1b strain can significantly affect treatment outcomes. Treatment with IFN/SOF/RBV and especially LDV/SOF/RBV ensured significantly higher SVR in patients infected with RF1_2k/1b strain compared to standard HCV genotype 2 treatment with SOF/RBV. There is a need to reassess existing methods for the management of HCV genotype 2 infections, especially in areas with high prevalence of the RF1_2k/1b strain.     

Sequential immunological analysis of HBV/HCV co-infected patients during Peg-IFN/RBV therapy

Background

The immunopathogenesis of dual chronic infection with hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus (HBV/HCV) remains unclear. The in vivo suppressive effects of each virus on the other have been reported. In this study we aimed to analyze the virological and immunological parameters of HBV/HCV coinfected patients during pegylated interferon/ribavirin (Peg-IFN/RBV) therapy.

Methods

One patient with high HBV-DNA and high HCV-RNA titers (HBV-high/HCV-high) and 5 patients with low HBV-DNA and high HCV-RNA titers (HBV-low/HCV-high) were enrolled. Twenty patients monoinfected with HBV and 10 patients monoinfected with HCV were enrolled as control subjects.. In vitro cultures of Huh 7 cells with HBV/HCV dual infection were used to analyze the direct interaction of HBV/HCV.

Results

Direct interaction of HBV clones and HCV could not be detected in the Huh-7 cells. In the HBV-high/HCV-high-patient, the HCV-RNA level gradually declined and HBV-DNA gradually increased during Peg-IFN/RBV therapy. Activated CD4- and CD8-positive T cells were increased at 1 month of Peg-IFN/RBV-therapy, but HBV-specific IFN-??-secreting cells were not increased and HBV-specific interleukin (IL)-10 secreting cells were increased. The level of HBV- and HCV-specific IFN-??-secreting cells in the HBV-high/HCV-high-patient was low in comparison to that in the HBV- or HCV-monoinfected patients. In the HBV-low/HCV-high-patient, HCV-RNA and HBV-DNA rapidly declined during Peg-IFN/RBV therapy. Activated CD4- and CD8-positive T cells were increased, and HBV- and HCV-specific IFN-??-secreting cells were also increased during Peg-IFN/RBV-therapy.

Conclusion

The immunological responses of the HBV-high/HCV-high patient were low in comparison to the responses in HBV and HCV monoinfected patients. Moreover, the response of immune cells in the HBV-high/HCV-high patient during Peg-IFN/RBV therapy was insufficient to suppress HBV and HCV.     

Re-re-treatment of hepatitis C virus: Eight patients who relapsed twice after direct-acting-antiviral drugs

AIM: To determine risk factors associated with hepatitis C virus(HCV) treatment failure after direct acting antivirals in patients with complex treatment histories.METHODS: All HCV mono-infected patients who received treatment at our institution were queried.Analysis was restricted to patients who previously failed treatment with boceprevir(BOC) or telaprevir(TVR) and started simeprevir(SMV) and sofosbuvir(SOF) ± ribavirin(RBV) between December 2013 and June 2014. Patients with human immunodeficiency virus(HIV)/HCV co-infection or patients who received a liver transplant in the past were excluded. Viral loads were recorded while on treatment and after treatment. Data collection continued until December,31 st 2014 when data analysis was initiated. Patients missing virologic outcomes data were not included in the analysis. Analysis of 35 patients who had virologic outcome data available resulted in eight patients who were viral load negative at the end of treatment with SMF/SOF but later relapsed. Data related to patient demographics,HCV infection,and treatment history was collected in order to identify risk factors shared among patients who failed treatment with SMF/SOF.RESULTS: Eight patients who were treated with the first generation HCV protease inhibitors BOC or TVR in combination with pegylated-interferon(PEG) and RBV who failed this triple therapy were subsequently retreated with an off-label all-oral regimen of SMV and SOF for 12 wk,with RBV in seven cases. Treatment was initiated before the Food and Drug Administration approved a 24-wk SMV/SOF regimen for patients with liver cirrhosis. All eight patients had an end of treatment response,but later relapsed. Eight(100%) patients were male. Mean age was 56(range,49-64). Eight(100%) patients had previously failed PEG/RBV dual therapy at least once in addition to prior failure with triple therapy. Total number of times treated ranged from 3-6(mean 3.8). Eight(100%) patients were male had liver cirrhosis as determined by Fibroscan or MRI. Seven(87.5%) patients had genotype 1a HCV. Seven(87.5%) patients had over 1 million IU/m L HCV RNA at the time of re-treatment.CONCLUSION: This study identifies factors associated with SMV/SOF treatment failure and provides evidence that twleve weeks of SMV/SOF/RBV is insufficient in cirrhotics with high-titer genotype 1a HCV.     

Add‐on effects of fluvastatin in simeprevir/pegylated‐interferon/ribavirin combination therapy for patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection: A randomized controlled study

Background

The Japan Society of Hepatology guidelines indicate that hepatitis C virus (HCV) protease inhibitor combination therapy with simeprevir (SMV), pegylated‐interferon (Peg‐IFN), and ribavirin (RBV) is a therapeutic option for patients who fail to respond to a direct direct‐acting antiviral‐containing regimen. However, treatment outcomes have room for improvement. Fluvastatin (FLV) add‐on treatment in Peg‐IFN and RBV combination therapy for HCV‐infected patients significantly improved the sustained virologic response (SVR), but the add‐on effect of FLV on SMV combination therapy is not well understood.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized, multicenter study in which a total of 61 HCV genotype 1b‐infected patients were recruited and 60 eligible patients were randomly allocated to two groups that received 12 weeks of SMV/Peg‐IFN/RBV followed by 12 weeks of Peg‐IFN/RBV with or without 24 weeks of FLV. The SVR rate and adverse events were compared between the two groups.

Results

Thirty‐one patients were allocated to the FLV add‐on group and 29 patients were allocated to the control group. Baseline clinical factors, including median age, baseline platelet count, alanine aminotransferase level, HCV RNA titer, Fibrosis‐4 index, and rate of IL28B minor genotype, were all similar between the two groups. The rapid virologic response, end‐of‐treatment response rates, SVR rates at 24 weeks after treatment, and safety profiles were also similar between the two groups.

Conclusions

This prospective, randomized, multicenter study indicated that FLV had no add‐on effect when given with SMV/Peg‐IFN/RBV combination therapy for genotype 1b HCV‐infected patients.     

Natural history of anemia associated with interferon/ribavirin therapy for patients with HIV/HCV coinfection

The natural history of anemia related to interferon/ribavirin (IFN/RBV) treatment in patients with human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus (HIV/HCV) coinfection is not completely understood. The current 8-week, multicenter, observational study characterized anemia over the course of HCV treatment in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. Eligible HIV/HCV coinfected patients were receiving care in community-based and academic institutions and were on stable antiretroviral therapy and initiating IFN/RBV therapy. Hb, sEPO, reticulocytes, transfusions, laboratory values (e.g., total bilirubin), and IFN and RBV dosages were monitored weekly. Ninety-one patients were analyzed (mean age, 46 years; 71% on HAART) and 53 patients completed the study. Mean Hb decreased significantly (5.0 g/dl) within 1 week of initiating IFN/RBV therapy (p = 0.0002); Hb nadir occurred at a median of 37 days. Maximum Hb decreases of > or =2.0 g/dl occurred in 56 (62%) patients and > or =3.0 g/dl occurred in 45 (49%) patients. Reticulocyte count increased within the first 2 weeks and sEPO peaked at week 3. Mean increase from baseline to week 2 in reticulocyte count and sEPO, respectively, was 1.3% (n = 74) and 45.0 mIU/ml (n = 80) (p < 0.0001 for each parameter), and from baseline to week 8 was 0.9% (n = 48) and 41.0 mIU/ml (n = 52) (p < or = 0.0001 for each parameter). Adverse events (AEs) were the most common reason for study discontinuation (66% of discontinuing patients). Among the 25 patients who discontinued due to AEs, 84% discontinued due to anemia (n = 21). Significant decreases in Hb were observed in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients within 1 week of initiating IFN/RBV therapy. sEPO and reticulocyte increases were blunted in response to anemia; Hb levels did not return to baseline values and anemia was a frequent reason for discontinuing the study.     

Analysis of the complete open reading frame of hepatitis C virus in genotype 2a infection reveals critical sites influencing the response to peginterferon and ribavirin therapy

Purpose

A proportion of patients infected with genotype 2a hepatitis C virus (HCV) cannot achieve a sustained virological response (SVR) to pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin therapy (PEG-IFN/RBV) but the reason remains unclear. The present study aimed to clarify the possible correlation between viral sequence variations and final outcome.

Methods

The pretreatment complete open reading frame (ORF) sequences of genotype 2a HCV were determined by direct sequencing for two independent groups of patients (43 patients as test; group 1 and 35 as validation; group 2), and the correlation with the final outcome was explored.

Results

Patients with SVR (n = 58) and with non-SVR (n = 20) differed significantly in pretreatment HCV RNA level (p = 0.002), fibrosis score (p = 0.047), and cumulative RBV dosage (p = 0.003). By comparison of all amino acid positions in the complete HCV ORFs, threonine at amino acid (aa) 110 in the core region was remarkably frequent in SVR (p = 0.01 for group 1, p = 0.004 for group 2, and p = 5E?05 for combined). A sliding window analysis revealed that the total number of amino acid variations within the NS5A aa 2258–2306 region were significantly high in SVR compared to non-SVR patients (p = 0.01 for group 1, p = 0.006 for group 2, and p = 0.0006 for combined). Multivariate analyses revealed that core aa 110 (p = 0.02), NS5A aa 2258–2306 (p = 0.03), and cumulative RBV dosage (p = 0.02) were identified as independent variables associated with the final outcome.

Conclusions

The outcome of PEG-IFN/RBV therapy is significantly influenced by variation in the core and NS5A regions in genotype 2a HCV infection.     

Response-Guided Therapy for Hepatitis C Genotype 2 and 3 in Those with HIV Coinfection

Background

Current guidelines recommend that interferon-based treatment of hepatitis C (HCV) genotype 2 or 3 in those with HIV coinfection should be for 48 weeks, especially if HCV PCR remains positive after 4 weeks of treatment.

Aim

To examine a single-center experience using response-guided therapy (RGT) using pegylated interferon (PegIFN) and weight-based ribavirin (RBV) for treating HCV genotype 2 or 3 in those with HIV coinfection.

Methods

Electronic medical records were used to identify patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3 HIV coinfection seen at the Toronto General Hospital Immunodeficiency Clinic from February 2003 to December 2012. HCV PCR was tested after every 4 weeks of treatment until it was negative (<50 IU/mL). RGT protocol was as follows: Those with HCV PCR first negative after 4 weeks (VR4) were treated 24 weeks; first negative after 8 weeks (VR8) treated 36 weeks and VR12 treated 48 weeks.

Result

Database search identified 35 individuals with HCV genotype 2 or 3. Twelve were excluded. Total 23 patients completed the treatment and were included for data analysis. Eleven of 23 (48 %) achieved VR4 and eleven of 23 (48 %) achieved VR8. Only one individual had detectable viremia to week 12 and required 48 weeks of treatment. The majority (96 %) were successfully treated with <48 weeks of PegIFN–RBV therapy. One hundred percent achieved SVR with a response-guided HCV therapy.

Conclusion

The use of response-guided therapy allows therapy to be shortened in the majority of individuals. HCV PCR testing should be performed every 4 weeks during the first 12 weeks of therapy until HCV PCR is negative.     

Mutations in the interferon sensitivity determining region and virological response to combination therapy with pegylated-interferon alpha 2b plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C-1b infection

Background

Pegylated-interferon-alpha 2b (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) therapy is currently the de-facto standard treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The aims of this study were to analyze the clinical and virological factors associated with a higher rate of response in patients with HCV genotype 1b infection treated with combination therapy.

Methods

We analyzed, retrospectively, 239 patients with chronic hepatitis C-1b infection who received 48 weeks of combination therapy. We assessed clinical and laboratory parameters, including age, gender, pretreatment hemoglobin, platelet counts, HCV RNA titer, liver histology, the number of interferon sensitivity determining region (ISDR) mutations and substitutions of the core amino acids 70 and 91. Drug adherence was monitored in each patient. We carried out univariate and multivariate statistical analyses of these parameters and clinical responses.

Results

On an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, 98 of the 239 patients (41%) had sustained virological responses (SVRs). Patients with more than two mutations in the ISDR had significantly higher SVR rates (P < 0.01). Univariate analyses showed that stage of fibrosis, hemoglobin, platelet counts, ISDR mutations, serum HCV RNA level, and adherence to PEG-IFN plus RBV were significantly correlated with SVR rates. Multivariate analysis in subjects with good drug adherence extracted the number of ISDR mutations (two or more: odds ratio [OR] 5.181).

Conclusions

The number of mutations in the ISDR sequence of HCV-1b (≥2) is the most effective parameter predicting a favorable clinical outcome of 48-week PEG-IFN plus RBV therapy in patients with HCV genotype 1b infection.     

Meta-analysis: mortality and serious adverse events of peginterferon plus ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C

Background

Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) therapy is the current standard of care for patients with chronic hepatitis C. Determining precisely the risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) and mortality from a single study is rather difficult because of the infrequency of such events. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the rates of SAEs and the mortality of PEG-IFN/RBV therapy in a pooled large sample, and to assess the relationship between SAEs and mortality rates and therapeutic characteristics.

Methods

A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of PEG-IFN/RBV therapy. We calculated the crude mortality and SAE rates with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Eighty studies with 153 treatment arms that included 27569 patients were enrolled (14401 patients treated with Peg-IFN alpha-2a/RBV and 13168 with Peg-IFN alpha-2b/RBV). All-cause and treatment-related deaths were observed in 50 (0.18 %; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.13–0.24 %) and sixteen (0.058 %; 95 % CI 0.033–0.094 %) patients, respectively. The crude SAE rate was 7.08 % (95 % CI 6.75–7.41 %). Subgroup analysis revealed higher SAE rates in patients receiving PEG-IFN alpha-2a than in those with PEG-IFN alpha-2b (7.45 vs. 6.74 %), and higher SAE rates with higher doses than with the lower doses in PEG-IFN-2a and 2b (11.94 vs. 6.99 %, 7.10 vs. 5.05 %, respectively), and with extended duration (>48 weeks) than with standard duration (48 weeks) (15.5 vs. 6.67 %) in PEG-IFN alpha-2a.

Conclusion

The mortality rate during PEG-IFN/RBV therapy was acceptably low, but the rate of SAEs was not negligible in a treatment for a benign disease, and the rate was affected by treatment regimens.     

Elevated serum uric acid level was a notable adverse event during combination therapy with sofosbuvir and ribavirin

Aim

Combination therapy with sofosbuvir and ribavirin (SOF/RBV) has been recently available for chronic hepatitis C patients with genotype 2 (CHG2) in Japan. The domestic phase III clinical trial showed a high antiviral effect with a relatively safe adverse event (AE) profile. Our aim was to report an important AE detected during treatment.

Methods

A prospective multi‐institutional study of 12‐week combination therapy with SOF/RBV for CHG2 was carried out to evaluate efficacy and safety.

Results

The eligible subjects included 142 patients. Out of 50 assessable patients, 16% of the patients were diagnosed with hyperuricemia. The proportions of subjects with grade 1, grade 3, and grade 4 hyperuricemia were 12, 2, and 2%, respectively. Serum uric acid (UA) levels at week 1 of the therapy (W1) were numerically the highest during therapy in patients with hyperuricemia, and the ratio of W1/baseline serum UA levels was significantly higher than that of post‐treatment week 4 or 8/baseline serum UA levels in assessable patients. Serum UA levels at W1 were significantly correlated with body mass index. The difference between serum UA levels at W1 and baseline serum UA levels was significantly correlated with the difference between serum creatinine levels at W1 and baseline serum creatinine levels.

Conclusions

Elevated serum UA level was a notable AE associated with SOF/RBV therapy for CHG2. However, because of the small number of subjects, the exact frequency of AEs should be re‐evaluated with larger cohorts. We need to remember that elevated serum UA level might develop during the therapy, especially at W1.     

Relevance of the Core 70 and IL-28B polymorphism and response-guided therapy of peginterferon alfa-2a ± ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C of Genotype 1b: a multicenter randomized trial,ReGIT-J study

Background

We conducted a multicenter randomized clinical trial to determine the optimal treatment strategy against chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) with genotype 1b and a high viral load (G1b/high).

Methods

The study subjects included 153 patients with G1b/high. Patients were initially treated with PEG-IFNα-2a alone and then randomly assigned to receive different treatment regimens. Ribavirin (RBV) was administered to all patients with HCV RNA at week 4. Patients negative for HCV RNA at week 4 were randomly assigned to receive PEG-IFNα-2a (group A) or PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV (group B). Patients who showed HCV RNA at week 4 but were negative at week 12 were randomly assigned to receive weekly PEG-IFNα-2a (group C) or biweekly therapy (group D). Patients who showed HCV RNA at week 12 but were negative at week 24 were randomly assigned to receive PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV (group E) or PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV/fluvastatin (group F).

Results

Overall, the rate of sustained virological response (SVR) was 46 % (70/153). The total SVR rate in the group (A, D, and F) of response-guided therapy was significantly higher than that in the group (B, C, and E) of conventional therapy [70 % (38/54) versus 52 % (32/61), p = 0.049]. Although IL28-B polymorphism and Core 70 mutation were significantly associated with efficacy, patients with rapid virological response (RVR) and complete early virological response (cEVR) achieved high SVR rates regardless of their status of IL-28B polymorphism and Core 70 mutation.

Conclusion

In addition to knowing the IL-28B polymorphism and Core 70 mutation status, understanding the likelihood of virological response during treatment is critical in determining the appropriate treatment strategy.     

Baseline risk factors for relapse in HIV/HCV co-infected patients treated with PEG-IFN/RBV

Purpose

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) viral relapse (VR) after end-of-treatment response (ETR) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infected patients is observed in as many as one in three co-infected patients. The aim of the study was to identify baseline risk factors for VR in HIV/HCV co-infected patients treated with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (PEG-INF/RBV).

Methods

A total of 212 Caucasian HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C naïve for PEG-INF/RBV were followed prospectively. Patients were included in this prospective study if they had completed a full course of therapy with an ETR. We assessed the relationship between VR rate and potential predictors of relapse.

Results

Of the patients followed, 130 (61.3 %) attained ETR and 103 (79.2 %) achieved sustained virological response (SVR). Consequently, 27 (20.8 %) showed VR. Patients who relapsed were more often male (p = 0.036), carried the non-CC rs14158 genotype in the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLr) gene (p = 0.039), had higher baseline HCV RNA levels (p = 0.012), body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m² (p = 0.034), significant liver fibrosis (p < 0.001), had been diagnosed with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining criteria in the past (p = 0.001) and bore the HCV genotypes 1/4 (p = 0.046) when compared with SVR patients. The IL28B genotype was not associated with relapse. Multivariate binary logistic regression showed that high baseline HCV RNA, significant liver fibrosis, HCV genotypes 1/4, being overweight and being diagnosed with AIDS-defining criteria in the past were independently associated with relapse.

Conclusions

Our study shows that VR can be accurately predicted in HIV/HCV co-infected patients on the basis of risk factors which can be identified before treatment.     

ITPA polymorphism effects on decrease of hemoglobin during sofosbuvir and ribavirin combination treatment for chronic hepatitis C

Background

Polymorphisms in the inosine triphosphatase (ITPA) gene is associated with anemia induced by peg-interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, the effect of ITPA polymorphism on sofosbuvir plus RBV treatment is unknown.

Methods

Two hundred and forty-four patients with chronic HCV genotype 2 infection without decompensated liver cirrhosis were treated with sofosbuvir plus RBV for 12 weeks. The effects of ITPA polymorphism on hemoglobin levels and RBV dose reduction and treatment response were analyzed. ITPA (rs1127354) was genotyped using the Invader assay. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with sustained virological response (SVR).

Results

Overall, SVR12 was achieved in 231 (94.7%) patients, based on intention to treat analysis. During the therapy, reduction of hemoglobin levels was significantly greater in ITPA genotype CC patients than CA/AA patients. Therefore, the cumulative proportion of patients with RBV dose reduction was significantly higher and total dose of RBV was significantly lower in patients with CC genotype compared to CA/AA genotypes. SVR12 rates were similar between ITPA genotypes CC and CA/AA (94.7 and 94.4%, respectively, P = 0.933). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified FIB4 index <3.25 (odds ratio [OR], 9.388 for ≥3.25; P = 0.005) and low body weight (OR, 1.059, for high body weight; P = 0.017) as independent predictors for SVR12.

Conclusions

ITPA polymorphism influences hemoglobin levels and incidence of RBV dose reduction during sofosbuvir plus RBV therapy. However, ITPA genotype CC patients can expect a curative effect equivalent to CA/AA patients for chronic HCV genotype 2 infection.

     

Once-daily simeprevir (TMC435) with peginterferon/ribavirin for treatment-naïve hepatitis C genotype 1-infected patients in Japan: the DRAGON study

Background

Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of simeprevir (TMC435), a once-daily, noncovalent, oral hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease inhibitor, was evaluated in combination with peginterferon α-2a/ribavirin (PegIFNα-2a/RBV) for treatment-naïve, HCV genotype 1-infected patients in Japan.

Methods

In a multicenter, randomized clinical trial in Japan, ninety-two patients received either simeprevir (50 or 100 mg QD) for 12 or 24 weeks with PegIFNα-2a/RBV for 24 or 48 weeks (according to response-guided therapy [RGT] criteria), or PegIFNα-2a/RBV for 48 weeks (PR48 group).

Results

Compared with the PR48 group, plasma HCV RNA reductions in the simeprevir groups were rapid and more substantial (Week 4: ?5.2, ?5.2 and ?2.9 log₁₀IU/mL for simeprevir 50 mg combined, 100 mg combined, and PR48 groups, respectively). High rapid virologic response rates (83, 90, and 8 % for simeprevir 50 mg combined, 100 mg combined, and PR48 groups, respectively) led to high sustained virologic response rates (77–92 %, compared with 46 % for PR48). All but one of the simeprevir-treated patients were eligible to complete treatment after 24 weeks (RGT). Relapse rates in simeprevir-treated patients were low (8–17 %, compared with 36 % for the PR48 group). There were no notable differences in the safety profile between the simeprevir and PR48 groups.

Conclusions

The addition of simeprevir QD to PegIFNα-2a/RBV, as compared with PegIFNα-2a/RBV alone, demonstrated potent antiviral activity and significantly improved the rates of sustained virologic response, with a shortened 24-week treatment duration, in treatment-naive patients infected with HCV genotype 1 in Japan. Simeprevir was generally safe and well tolerated. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00996476).     

Thrombocytopenia in pegylated interferon and ribavirin combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C

Background

This study aimed to examine the therapeutic effect and prognostic indicators of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) combination therapy in thrombocytopenic patients with chronic hepatitis C, hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis, and those who underwent splenectomy or partial splenic embolization (PSE).

Methods

Of 326 patients with HCV-related chronic liver disease (252 with genotype 1b and 74 with genotype 2a/2b) treated with PEG-IFN/RBV, 90 were diagnosed with cirrhosis.

Results

Regardless of the degree of thrombocytopenia, the administration rate was significantly higher in the splenectomy/PSE group compared to the cirrhosis group. However, in patients with genotype 1b, the sustained virological response (SVR) rate was significantly lower in the cirrhosis and the splenectomy/PSE groups compared to the chronic hepatitis group. No cirrhotic patients with platelets less than 80,000 achieved an SVR. Patients with genotype 2a/2b were more likely to achieve an SVR than genotype 1b. Prognostic factors for SVR in patients with genotype 1b included the absence of esophageal and gastric varices, high serum ALT, low AST/ALT ratio, and the major homo type of the IL28B gene. Splenectomy- or PSE-facilitated induction of IFN in patients with genotype 2a/2b was more likely to achieve an SVR by an IFN dose maintenance regimen. Patients with genotype 1b have a low SVR regardless of splenectomy/PSE. In particular, patients with a hetero/minor type of IL28B did not have an SVR.

Conclusions

Splenectomy/PSE for IFN therapy should be performed in patients expected to achieve a treatment response, considering their genotype and IL28B.     

Efficacy and safety results of patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3 infection treated with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and sofosbuvir with or without ribavirin (QUARTZ II‐III)

The efficacy and safety of an investigational combination of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir (OBV/PTV/r) plus sofosbuvir (SOF) ± ribavirin (RBV) in patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3 infection with or without cirrhosis was evaluated. Patients with HCV genotype 3 infection without cirrhosis were randomized to receive OBV/PTV/r + SOF ± RBV for 12 weeks; OBV/PTV/r + SOF + RBV was administered to genotype 3‐infected patients with cirrhosis for 12 weeks and to genotype 2‐infected patients without cirrhosis for either 6 or 8 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by sustained virologic response [HCV RNA <25 IU/mL] 12 weeks post‐treatment (SVR12). Safety was assessed in all treated patients. In patients with genotype 3 infection with or without cirrhosis treated with 12 weeks of OBV/PTV/r + SOF ± RBV, the overall SVR12 rate was 98% (50/51), with no virologic failures. Patients with genotype 2 infection treated with OBV/PTV/r + SOF + RBV had SVR12 rates of 90% (9/10) and 44% (4/9) following 8‐ and 6‐week treatment durations, respectively; failure to achieve SVR12 for these patients was due to relapse without baseline or treatment‐emergent resistance‐associated substitutions. Thus, the investigational combination of OBV/PTV/r with SOF ± RBV was well tolerated and achieved high SVR rates with no virologic failures in patients with genotype 3 infection. Combining direct‐acting antivirals with complementary mechanisms of action and different viral targets may be an effective treatment strategy that may allow for shorter durations of therapy.     

Prediction of response to pegylated interferon/ribavirin combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C genotype 1b and high viral load

Background

This study explores pretreatment predictive factors for ultimate virological responses to pegylated interferon-α (1.5?μg/kg/week) and ribavirin (600–1000?mg/day) (PEG-IFN/RBV) combination therapy for patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-1b and a high viral load.

Methods

A total of 75 patients underwent PEG-IFN/RBV combination therapy for 48?weeks. HCV amino acid (aa) substitutions in non-structural protein 5a, including those in the IFN/RBV resistance-determining region (IRRDR) and the IFN sensitivity-determining region and the core regions, as well as the genetic variation (rs8099917) near the interleukin 28B (IL28B) gene (genotype TT) were analyzed.

Results

Of the 75 patients, 49?% (37/75) achieved a sustained virological response (SVR), 27?% (20/75) showed relapse, and 24?% (18/75) showed null virological response (NVR). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified IRRDR with 6 or more mutations (IRRDR ≥6) [odds ratio (OR) 11.906, p?<?0.0001] and age <60?years (OR 0.228, p?=?0.015) as significant determiners of SVR and IL28B minor (OR 14.618, p?=?0.0019) and platelets <15?×?10⁴/mm³ (OR 0.113, p?=?0.0096) as significant determiners of NVR. A combination of IRRDR ≥6 and age <60?years improved SVR predictability (93.3?%), and that of IRRDR ≤5 and age ≥60?years improved non-SVR predictability (84.0?%). Similarly, a combination of IL28B minor and platelets <15?×?10⁴/mm³ improved NVR predictability (85.7?%), and that of IL28B major and platelets ≥15?×?10⁴/mm³ improved non-NVR (response) (97.1?%) predictability.

Conclusion

IRRDR ≥6 and age <60?years were significantly associated with SVR. IL28B minor and platelets <15?×?10⁴/mm³ were significantly associated with NVR. Certain combinations of these factors improved SVR and NVR predictability and could, therefore, be used to design therapeutic strategies.     

Response to Peginterferon-alfa 2b and Ribavirin in Japanese Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 2

Background

The current standard treatment for patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) of genotype 2 is the combination of peginterferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) for 24 weeks.

Aims

We assessed the sustained virological response (SVR) rates in HCV genotype 2-infected Japanese patients in relation to the duration of treatment.

Methods

Between 2006 and 2009, among 147 patients with HCV genotype 2-infection in Chiba Prefecture, 138 consecutive patients were finally enrolled. Twenty-one, 97 and 20 patients were treated with PEG-IFN-alfa 2b plus RBV for 16, 24 and 48 weeks, respectively. Epidemiological data and treatment outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. HCV RNA was measured with COBAS AMPLICOR HCV Monitor Test v. 2.0.

Results

The overall SVR rate was 82.6% (114 of 138): treatment-naïve patients, 86.4% (89 of 103); patients with history of previous treatment, 71.4% (25 of 35). Patients treated for 16, 24 and 48 weeks obtained SVR rates of 66.6% (14 of 21), 86.5% (84 of 97) and 80.0 (16 of 20), respectively.

Conclusions

The SVR rates of PEG-IFN-alfa 2b plus RBV in Japanese patients were similar to those in previous studies. Combination treatment for 24 weeks for some patients infected with HCV genotype 2 may be superior to that for 16 weeks. More precise patient selection will be needed to shorten the combination treatment.