A prospective, randomized study in critically ill patients using the Oligon Vantex catheter

Microbial colonization and the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSI) associated with Oligon Vantex silver central venous catheters (CVC) in critically ill patients were determined. A prospective, randomized, controlled 17-month trial was carried out in an intensive care unit (ICU). All patients requiring a triple-lumen CVC for four days or longer were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive a standard polyurethane CVC or an Oligon Vantex silver CVC. Before removal of the catheter either due to discharge from the ICU or suspected infection, blood for cultures was taken via the CVC and a peripheral site. Skin and hub swabs and catheter-tips were also cultured. Two hundred and six catheters, 103 in both groups, were evaluated. In the control group (CG) 45/103 (44%) and in the silver group (SG) 30/103 (29%) were colonized or had a CR-BSI (P=0.04). The SG was less likely to be colonized than the CG when the catheter remained in situ for eight days or less (P=0.03) or over 15 days (P=0.01); a second or subsequent catheter was present in the same patient (P=0.002), or if the CVC was placed in the internal jugular vein (P=0.05). Multivariate logistic-regression showed predisposing factors for catheter colonization were jugular and femoral sites, second or subsequent catheter, and being a member of the CG. CR-BSI occurred in five cases (four in CG). Rates of CR-BSI per 1000 catheter-days in the CG were 2.8 and in the SG, 0.8 (P<0.001). The Oligon Vantex silver catheter reduced the incidence of catheter-colonization and may decrease the risk of CR-BSI.     

A needleless closed system device (CLAVE) protects from intravascular catheter tip and hub colonization: a prospective randomized study

Hub colonization and subsequent intraluminal progression due to frequent opening and manipulation of intravenous systems is the cause of many catheter-related infections (CRI). A prospective, comparative, randomized study was performed to assess a new closed-needleless hub device (CLAVE) compared with conventional open systems (COS). End-points were hub and skin colonization, catheter tip colonization, catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) and number of accidental needlesticks. All cultures were processed following standard semiquantitative microbiological techniques. The study involved patients who underwent heart surgery over an 11-month period in a post-surgical ICU. During the study period, 352 patients underwent major heart surgery and 1774 catheters were inserted. Overall, 865 catheters in 178 patients were allocated to the CLAVE system and 909 catheters in 174 patients to COS. The groups were similar regarding underlying conditions and risk factors for infection. Comparison of endpoint results in CLAVE and COS groups was as follows: incidence density per 1000 catheter-days of tip colonization: 59.2 versus 83.6 (P=0.003); of hub colonization: 7.56 versus 24.66 (P=0.0017); of skin colonization: 41.5 versus 58.9 (P=0.038); and of CRBSI 3.78 versus 5.89 (P=0.4). There was one accidental needlestick and one catheter-related prosthetic endocarditis in the COS group. Multivariate analysis showed that CLAVE use was an independent protective factor for tip colonization. CLAVE offered significant protection from catheter-tip and hub colonization.     

Catheter manipulations and the risk of catheter-associated bloodstream infection in neonatal intensive care unit patients

A prospective cohort study was performed to evaluate the influence of catheter manipulations on catheter associated bloodstream infection (CABSI) in neonates. Neonates admitted between 1 November 1993 and 31 October 1994 at the neonatal intensive care unit of a university hospital were included in the study. Seventeen episodes of CABSI occurred in 357 central catheters over a period of 3470 catheter-days, with a cumulative incidence of 4.7/100 catheters and an incidence density of 4.9/1000 catheter-days. Patient and catheter-related risk factors independently associated with CABSI were: catheter hub colonization (odds ratio [OR] = 32.6, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 4.3-249), extremely low weight (相似文献   

Comparison of bacterial colonization rates of antiseptic impregnated and pure polymer central venous catheters in the critically ill

A study was performed on critically ill patients to evaluate the rate of colonization and catheter-related sepsis using antiseptic bonded (Arrowguard Arrow International) versus smooth pure polymer (Infectguard MedexMedical Ltd) central venous catheters. Two hundred and thirty-two catheters were inserted into 181 patients. Indications for removal included local or systemic infection, the catheter was no longer required and patient death. No statistical difference in colonization rate was found between the two types of catheter.     

Bloodstream infection related to catheter connections: a prospective trial of two connection systems

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) related to central venous catheters (CVCs) and arterial catheters (ACs) are an increasing problem in the management of critically ill patients. Our objective was to assess the efficacy of a needle-free valve connection system (SmartSite), Alaris Medical Systems, San Diego, CA, USA) in the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI). Patients admitted to an intensive care unit were prospectively assigned to have a CVC and AC connected with either a needle-free valve connection system (NFVCS) or a three-way stopcock connection (3WSC). The characteristics of the patients were similar in the two groups. Before manipulation, the NFVCS was disinfected with chlorhexidine digluconate 0.5% alcoholic solution. The 3WSC was not disinfected between use but it was covered with a protection cap. A total of 799 patients requiring the insertion of a multilumen CVC or AC for >48h from 1 April 2002 to 31 December 2003 were included. CR-BSI rates were 4.61 per 1000 days of catheter use in the disinfected NFVCS group and 4.11 per 1000 days of catheter use in the 3WSC group (P=0.59). When CVC-BSIs and AC-BSIs were analysed separately, the rate of CVC-BSI was 4.26 per 1000 days of catheter use in the NFVCS group, compared with 5.27 in the 3WSC group (P=0.4). The incidence rate of AC-BSI was 5.00 per 1000 days of catheter use in the NFVCS group, compared with 2.83 in the 3WSC group (P=0.08). The use of NFVCS does not reduce the incidence of catheter-related bacteraemia. The arterial catheter (AC) is a significant source of infection in critically ill patients.     

Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.

BACKGROUND: Although many catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are preventable, measures to reduce these infections are not uniformly implemented. OBJECTIVE: To update an existing evidenced-based guideline that promotes strategies to prevent CRBSIs. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE database, conference proceedings, and bibliographies of review articles and book chapters were searched for relevant articles. STUDIES INCLUDED: Laboratory-based studies, controlled clinical trials, prospective interventional trials, and epidemiologic investigations. OUTCOME MEASURES: Reduction in CRBSI, catheter colonization, or catheter-related infection. SYNTHESIS: The recommended preventive strategies with the strongest supportive evidence are education and training of healthcare providers who insert and maintain catheters; maximal sterile barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; use of a 2% chlorhexidine preparation for skin antisepsis; no routine replacement of central venous catheters for prevention of infection; and use of antiseptic/antibiotic-impregnated short-term central venous catheters if the rate of infection is high despite adherence to other strategies (ie, education and training, maximal sterile barrier precautions, and 2% chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis). CONCLUSION: Successful implementation of these evidence-based interventions can reduce the risk for serious catheter-related infection.     

A randomized, controlled trial of a new vascular catheter flush solution (minocycline-EDTA) in temporary hemodialysis access.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We previously demonstrated that minocycline-EDTA was efficacious at preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections (BSIs) in three patients with recurrent infections. This study compared heparin with minocycline-EDTA as flush solutions used among dialysis patients with central venous catheters, a high-risk group for catheter-related BSI. METHODS: Patients were enrolled within 72 hours of catheter insertion and randomized to receive heparin or minocycline-EDTA as a flush after each dialysis session. Each syringe containing flush solution was wrapped in orange plastic to conceal the type of solution it contained. Patients were observed for evidence of infection and catheter thrombosis. After catheters were removed, cultures were performed to determine whether microbial colonization had occurred. RESULTS: During a 14-month period, 60 patients were enrolled (30 in each group). The two groups had similar demographics and underlying diseases. Catheter survival at 90 days was 83% for the minocycline-EDTA group versus 66% for the heparin group (P = .07). Significant catheter colonization, a surrogate measure of catheter-related infection, was significantly more frequent in the heparin group (9 of 14 vs 1 of 11; P = .005). There was only one catheter-related bacteremia and it occurred in the heparin group. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with heparin, minocycline-EDTA had a better 90-day catheter survival (P = .07) and a decreased rate of catheter colonization. This pilot study warrants a larger prospective, randomized trial.     

Central catheter-related infections: comparison of pulmonary artery catheters and triple lumen catheters for the delivery of hyperalimentation in a critical care setting

We prospectively studied the risk of catheter-related sepsis (CRS) in 75 critically ill patients who received total parenteral nutrition (TPN) through 158 pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) and 214 triple-lumen catheters (TLCs). We relied on semiquantitative cultures of the catheter tips, peripheral blood cultures in febrile patients and clinical response to catheter removal to diagnose catheter-related sepsis. The infection rate was 2.5% (4/158) of PACs and 6.5% (14/214) of TLCs (p = 0.124). Colonization rates were 29.1% for PACs and 32% for TLCs. PACs were left in place a significantly shorter length of time than TLCs, 3.1 vs 5.1 days (p less than 0.005). Guidewire exchanges and subclavian vein insertions were associated with a decreased rate of CRS when compared to new insertions and internal jugular vein insertions, respectively. We conclude that pulmonary artery catheters can be used safely for the delivery of hyperalimentation in critically ill patients with no increased risk for catheter-related sepsis compared to triple-lumen catheters. The use of the PAC in this manner allows for the use of a single central venous catheter for the delivery of hyperalimentation and hemodynamic monitoring.     

Measurement of ultrasonic-induced chlorhexidine liberation: correlation of the activity of chlorhexidine-silver-sulfadiazine-impregnated catheters to agar roll technique and broth culture

The diagnosis of intravascular catheter-related infections continues to be a challenge to both the clinician and the microbiologist. To assess the antiseptic effects of silver-sulfadiazine-chlorhexidine-impregnated central venous catheters (SSC) on catheter culture systems, segments of fresh antiseptic- and non antiseptic-impregnated catheters as well as extracted catheters following five days of immersion in PBS were sonicated. The chlorhexidine liberated from the catheter material by ultrasonication was measured by HPLC. Fresh antiseptic-impregnated catheter segments rolled on seeded agar plates produced inhibition zones unlike catheters which had been extracted for >five days in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed that chlorhexidine-silversulfadiazine crystals were located in the superficial catheter matrix. Direct contact of superficially located drug particles with seeded agar plates probably caused the inhibition of bacterial growth. The study suggests that antiseptic compounds readily elute from fresh catheters during solid medium-based culturing processes and ultrasonication. The addition of inhibitors of silversulfadiazine-chlorhexidine to media may be prudent especially when culturing antimicrobial loaded catheters removed after short inwelling times.     

PICC置管对危重症患者中心静脉导管相关性血流感染的影响

目的探讨危重症患者留置PICC的静脉导管相关性血流感染发生情况,为危重症患者提供更多的静脉治疗途径,同时减少中心静脉导管相关性血流感染的发生,使PICC置管技术在危重病人中得到合理的应用。方法统计2009年上半年的中心静脉导管相关性血流感染发生率,分析引起导管感染的主要原因,对下半年使用中心静脉导管的病人在更换导管时作全面评估,改为留置PICC,两组病人均采用预防中心静脉导管相关性血流感染护理集束进行护理,导管感染发生率比较进行2检验,分析PICC置管技术对中心静脉导管相关性血流感染率的影响。结果 自采用留置PICC代替中心静脉导管换管后,病人出现静脉导管感染率的现象明显减少（由5.4%降至1.7%）,p〈0.05。结论预防静脉导管相关性血流感染,护理人员不仅需要严格执行相关护理指引,还需要护理人员有主动静脉输液治疗的理念,预测护理安全隐患,懂得适时、正确的评估,给予恰当置管方法,才能有效地减少静脉导管相关性血流感染的发生。     

Evidence-based prevention of catheter infection during parenteral nutrition

Parenteral nutrition is a risk factor for catheter-related bloodstream infection. Here we reviewed strategies for the prevention of catheter-related infections, which always must begin with the cornerstone of prevention: the strict adherence to aseptic techniques. Most research has been interested in coated catheters. From these results, it may be concluded that antibiotics or antiseptic-impregnated catheters, like those with minocycline-rifampicin or chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine, significantly reduce catheter-related blood stream infections. Antibiotics or antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters may even result in cost saving in intensive care units. Antiseptic or antibiotic-lock techniques would also be of interest to prevent catheter-related sepsis in high-risk patients who are receiving parenteral nutrition.     

Intravascular catheter colonization and related bloodstream infection in critically ill neonates

Intravascular catheter tip colonization was prospectively evaluated in critically ill neonates to determine its relationship to the type of device used, duration of catheterization, insertion site and nosocomial bloodstream infection. Sixty-one percent (376 of 621) of all intravascular catheter tips were retrieved from 91 infants. Thirteen percent (41 of 310) of peripheral intravenous, 14% (6 of 42) of umbilical, 21% (3 of 11) of central venous, 36% (4 of 11) of peripheral arterial and 100% (2 of 2) of femoral catheters were colonized. Duration of catheterization was significantly longer for colonized lines (p less than .001). Eight of 26 (30.8%) peripheral intravenous catheters remaining in place for more than three days were colonized, compared with 33 of 284 (11.6%) at three days or less (p = 0.012). Coagulase-negative staphylococcus was the organism most frequently isolated from catheter tips and bloodstream infections. Catheter colonization rates in this population were higher than those found in adults. Heavily manipulated devices and those in place for longer periods of time were the most frequently colonized.     

Infectious complications of implantable ports and Hickman catheters in paediatric haematology-oncology patients

The aim of this study was to define and compare the infectious and non-infectious complications associated with Hickman catheters and implantable ports in children. The study was conducted over a three-year period in the Department of Haematology-Oncology at the Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel. All patients who required a central venous catheter (CVC) were included in the study. For each episode of catheter-associated bloodstream infection, demographic, clinical and microbiology data were recorded. During the study period, 419 tunnelled CVCs (246 implantable ports and 173 Hickman) were inserted in 281 patients. Compared with implantable ports, Hickman catheters were associated with a significantly higher rate of bloodstream infections (4.656 vs 1.451 episodes per 1000 catheter-days), shorter time to first infection (52.31 vs 108.82 days, P < 0.001), shorter duration of catheterization (140.75 vs 277.28 days, P < 0.001), and higher rate of removal because of mechanical complications (P < 0.005). Gram-positive bacterial infections were more prevalent in the implantable port group (63.6% vs 41.6%), whereas Gram-negative rods, polymicrobial infections and mycobacterial infections were more prevalent in the Hickman group (31.4% vs 50.9%, 17% vs 36% and 0% vs 4.4%, respectively; P < 0.05 for all). Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation was identified as an independent risk factor for infection [odds ratio (OR) -1.68, P = 0.005] and for catheter removal due to complications (OR -2.0, P < 0.001). Implantable ports may be considered the preferred device for most paediatric oncology and stem cell transplantation patients.     

谷氨酰胺强化的肠外营养对肠瘘病人腔静脉导管感染的影响

目的:观察谷氨酰胺(Gln)强化的肠外营养(PN)对肠瘘病人腔静脉导管感染(CRI)的发生率及细菌谱的影响.方法:对2002年10月至2003年12月该院收治的使用腔静脉导管进行PN的肠瘘病人进行前瞻、随机研究.对照组接受常规全肠外营养(TPN),Gln组在常规TPN中加入力肽100ml.结果:117例肠瘘病人,共进行139次腔静脉置管.对照组71例病人共进行84次腔静脉置管,细菌定植的发生率为26.2%,导管相关性血行感染(CRBSI)的发生率为6.0%.Gln组46例病人共进行55次腔静脉置管,细菌定植的发生率为12.7%,CR-BSI为1.8%.Gln组和对照组病人革兰阴性细菌感染的发生率分别为3.6%与16.7%,二者有显著性差异(P=0.037).结论:Gln强化的PN可以减少肠瘘病人CRI的发生,尤其是来源于肠道的革兰阴性菌的感染.     

Use of triple-lumen subclavian catheters for administration of total parenteral nutrition.

This study evaluated the safety of triple vs single-lumen catheters in intravenous nutrition. Patients who were judged likely to benefit from a triple-lumen catheter were randomized to receive either a single-lumen catheter, with additional peripheral or central venous access as needed, or a triple-lumen catheter. All patients were at increased risk of catheter-related infection because of one or more of the following conditions: > 60 years of age, breakdown of skin integrity, severe underlying illness, diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, recent head or neck surgery, or presence of a preexisting infection. Patients were excluded who had neutropenia, were immunosuppressed, had body burns > 40%, or had contaminated wounds in the subclavicular area. Of 204 patients entered between June 1989 and November 1991, 177 completed the required > or = 7 days of therapy. Seventy-eight of these patients were randomized to a single-lumen catheter and 99 to a triple-lumen catheter. Catheters were inserted and maintained by the Nutrition Support Team. Dressings were monitored daily and changed weekly using a bio-occlusive dressing. When parameters were met for a possible septic episode, simultaneous peripheral and central catheter blood cultures were obtained using the Isolator method. Catheter-related sepsis was considered present if the colony count from a central catheter lumen was > or = 5 times that of the peripheral blood. The incidence of catheter-related sepsis for single-lumen catheters was 2.6% (2 of 78) compared with 13.1% for triple-lumen catheters (13 of 99) (p < .01). No correlation was found with the number of insertion attempts, catheter days, or patient's age.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of central venous catheter type on infections: a prospective clinical trial

This study reports on a block clinical trial of two types of central venous catheters (CVCS): antiseptic-impregnated catheters (AIC) and non-impregnated catheters (non-AIC), on catheter tip colonization and bacteraemia. In total, 500 catheters were inserted in 390 patients over the 18 month study period, 260 (52.0%) AIC and 240 (48.0%) non-AIC. Of these, 460 (92.0%) tips (237 AIC and 223 non-AIC) were collected. While significantly fewer AIC, 14 (5.9%), than non-AIC, 30 (13.5%), catheters were colonized (P<0.01), there was no difference in the rates of bacteraemias in the two groups (0.8% vs. 2.7%, respectively, P=0.16). There were 6.87 (95% CI 3.38-14.26) and 16.92 (95% CI 10.61-27.12) colonized AIC and non-AIC catheters, respectively, per 1000 catheter days, a difference that was significant (P<0.01). However, no difference emerged between bacteraemias in AIC and non-AIC catheters per 1000 catheter days measured at 0.98 (95% CI 0.24-5.54) and 3.38 (95% CI 1.29-9.34), respectively (P=0.10). Of the 444 CVCs that were sited in the subclavian or jugular veins and had tips collected, significantly more catheters were colonized in the jugular group, 19 (20%), compared with the subclavian group, 24 (6.9%; P< or =0.01). Overall, the low rates of colonization and bacteraemia may be explained by the population studied, the policies used and the employment of a clinical nurse dedicated to CVC management.     

Blood products: a significant risk factor for long-term catheter-related bloodstream infections in cancer patients.

Data obtained from a previous prospective randomized study in cancer patients conducted at our institution were analyzed to investigate risk factors for catheter-related (CR) bloodstream infections (BSIs). Our recent analysis showed that the administration of blood products through central venous catheters was a risk factor for CR BSI, whereas thrombocytopenia during catheterization may have provided protection against CR BSI, as did central venous catheter insertion under maximal sterile barrier precautions     

血管内插管的感染病因

纤维蛋白鞘是血管内插管的感染来源,它通常在中央静脉导管放置3天后形成。但只有大约50％的纤维蛋白鞘培养结果呈阳性。在那些培养结果阳性的病例中,细菌开始繁殖的时间因导管不同部位各不相同：皮下平均5．1天,导管尖端平均8．6天,导管腔内平均13．1天。导管上的细菌越来越多,就越可能发生炎症和血液感染。因导管导致血液感染的危险从小于2／1000器械使用天数（外周静脉留置针,外周穿刺中央静脉导管PICC,隧道式中央静脉导管,皮下输液装置）,10／1000器械使用天数（动脉导管和Swan-Ganz导管）,30－50／1000k器械使用天数（多通路中央静脉导管和肾透析肾插管）。影响血管内插管感染发生的内源性因素包括：宿主情况,细菌类型,导管材料以及制造工艺。人类非常容易感染葡萄球菌,免子却不这样。表面葡萄球菌需要粘多糖才能引起导管感染。硅胶材料的导管比聚氨酯、聚氯乙烯及特氟隆材料更容易发生感染,这可能与它的过度活化作用有关。影响血管内插管感染发生的外源性因素包括：无菌屏障的范围,皮肤消毒剂种类,穿刺人员是否经过专业培训,整个输液系统被外物介入的次数,高营养输液（酵母菌最易繁殖）,5％葡萄糖溶液（革兰氏阴性菌最易繁殖）以及脂质服液（糠疹癣菌最易繁殖）。     

Octenidine hydrochloride for the care of central venous catheter insertion sites in severely immunocompromised patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of octenidine hydrochloride, a non-alcoholic skin antiseptic, for the care of central venous catheter (CVC) insertion sites. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Bone marrow transplantation unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: All consecutive patients with a nontunneled CVC were enrolled prospectively after informed consent. METHODS: Octenidine hydrochloride (0.1%) was applied for disinfection at the CVC insertion site during dressing changes. The following cultures were performed weekly as well as at the occurrence of any systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria: cultures of the skin surrounding the CVC entry site, cultures of the three-way hub connected to the CVC, blood cultures, and cultures of the CVC tip on removal. Enhanced microbiological methods (skin swabs of a 24-cm2 standardized area, roll plate, and sonication of catheter tips) were applied. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five CVCs were inserted in 62 patients during the study period and remained for a mean period of 19.1 days, corresponding to 2,462 catheter-days. Bacterial density at the insertion site declined substantially over time, and most cultures became negative 2 weeks after insertion. Only 6 patients had a documented catheter-related bloodstream infection. The incidence density was 2.39 catheter infections per 1,000 catheter-days. No side effects were noted with application of the antiseptic. CONCLUSIONS: Disinfection with a skin antiseptic that contains octenidine hydrochloride is highly active and well tolerated. It leads to a decrease in skin colonization over time and may be a new option for CVC care.