Evidence that RU 24969-induced locomotor activity in C57/B1/6 mice is specifically mediated by the 5-HT1B receptor.

1. The behavioural effects of the 5-HT1B receptor agonists, RU 24969 and CGS 12066B, have been investigated in C57/B1/6 mice. 2. RU 24969 (1-30 mg kg-1) produced intense and prolonged hyperlocomotion and other behavioural changes. 3. CGS 12066B caused similar effects, but they were much less pronounced, inconsistent and transient irrespective of whether this drug was given i.p. (1-15 mg kg-1) or i.c.v. (0.2-40 micrograms). However, CGS 12066B (7.5 and 15 mg kg-1) caused a dose-related inhibition of RU 24969 (7.5 mg kg-1)-induced hyperlocomotion indicating that the former is a 5-HT1B partial agonist. 4. RU 24969 (7.5 mg kg-1 i.p.)-induced hyperlocomotion was inhibited by the (-)-, but not (+)-isomers of pindolol (4 mg kg-1) and propranolol (20 mg kg-1) but not by metoprolol (10 mg kg-1) or ICI 118,551 (5 mg kg-1), consistent with an involvement of 5-HT1A or 5-HT1B receptors. 5. The response was not altered by the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100135 (5 mg kg-1, s.c.), the 5-HT2A/5-HT2C receptor antagonist, ritanserin (0.1 mg kg-1), the selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, ondansetron (1 mg kg-1) or the non-selective 5-HT receptor antagonists methysergide (3 mg kg-1) and metergoline (3 mg kg-1). 6. Although spiroxatrine (0.1 mg kg-1) and ketanserin (1 mg kg-1) inhibited RU 24969-induced hyperlocomotion, these effects were probably due to antagonism of dopamine D2 receptors and alpha 1-adrenoceptors respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Is there a relationship between 5-HT1B receptors and the mechanisms of action of antidepressant drugs in the learned helplessness paradigm in rats?

The present study was undertaken to investigate, in the learned helplessness paradigm, (1) the effects of CGS 12066B, a selective 5-HT1B receptor agonist administered alone, and (2) the effects of CGS 12066B co-administered with tricyclics (clomipramine, imipramine) or 5-HT re-uptake blockers (citalopram, fluvoxamine). The results showed that (1) the selective 5-HT1B agonist failed to reverse the escape deficit, and (2) in the drug interaction studies, CGS 12066B did not modify the ability of tricyclics to reverse the escape deficit. The 5-HT1B agonist, however, did significantly reduce the ability of 5-HT re-uptake blockers to reverse the escape deficit. These results suggest that modulation of 5-HT1B sites might modify the enhancement of 5-HT neurotransmission by antidepressants, particularly 5-HT re-uptake blockers.     

Effect of 5-HT(1B) receptor ligands on self-administration of ethanol in an operant procedure in rats

Recent evidence suggests that 5-HT(1B) receptor activation modifies ethanol's reinforcing, intoxicating and discriminative stimulus effects. The present study further explored the role played by 5-HT(1A/1B) receptors by examining their influence on oral ethanol self-administration. Male Wistar rats were trained on an FR 4 schedule to obtain a reinforcer of 0.1 12% w/v ethanol solution. Once responding was stable, the effect of the 5-HT(1A/1B) agonist RU24969 alone and in combination with the 5-HT(1B) antagonist GR127935 or the 5-HT(1A) antagonists (+) WAY100135 and (+) WAY100635 was assessed. The effect of RU24969 on ethanol's pharmacokinetic profile and on operant oral saline self-administration was also examined to assess if alterations in oral ethanol self-administration were due to nonspecific effects on level pressing. For comparison, we examined the effect of another 5-HT(1A/1B) agonist, CGS12066B, on oral ethanol self-administration. Both RU24969 (0.1 to 1 mg/kg) and CGS12066B (0.1 to 1 mg/kg) significantly suppressed oral ethanol self-administration. Administration of GR127935 (1 mg/kg), significantly reversed the effects elicited by RU24969, whereas neither WAY100635 (1 mg/kg) nor (+)WAY100135 (1 mg/kg) had any effect. The effects of lower doses of RU24969 on oral ethanol self-administration were selective as oral saline self-administration and blood ethanol levels were not altered by these doses. These data demonstrate that 5-HT(1B) receptor activation suppresses oral ethanol self-administration. These studies provide further evidence that 5-HT(1B) receptors play a modulatory role in ethanol's behavioral effects.     

Noradrenergic mediation of spinal antinociception by 5-hydroxytryptamine: characterization of receptor subtypes.

The present study examined the involvement of spinal noradrenergic mechanisms in spinal antinociception by the 5-hydroxy-tryptamine (5-HT) receptor-selective agonists CGS 12066B (5-HT1B; 7-trifluoromethyl-4(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)-pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoxaline), TFMPP (5-HT1C; M-trifluoromethylphenyl-piperazine) and DOI (5-HT2; 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane) using the rat hot plate test. Effects of alpha-adrenoreceptor antagonists (phentolamine, yohimbine), the adrenergic neurotoxin 6-hydroxydopamine, and the selective noradrenergic uptake blocker desipramine were determined. CGS 12066B, TFMPP and DOI produced dose-related antinociception. The antinociceptive effect of each agent was reduced by pretreatment with both phentolamine and yohimbine (15-60 micrograms). Pretreatment with 6-hydroxydopamine (100 micrograms, intrathecal) for 7-10 days, which reduced spinal cord levels of noradrenaline by 87%, inhibited the action of TFMPP (and 5-HT), but not CGS 12066B or DOI. Pretreatment with desipramine (25 mg/kg, systemic) potentiated the action of TFMPP but not CGS 12066B or DOI (or 2-methyl-5-HT). These results suggest that antinociception by TFMPP is dependent on release of endogenous noradrenaline from the spinal cord, while that produced by CGS 12066B and DOI is not. As TFMPP exhibits a close similarity to 5-HT in these experiments, the 5-HT receptor subtype being activated to induce noradrenaline release may either be a 5-HT1C or a 5-HT1S subtype. Other mechanisms account for the observed blockade of the action of CGS 12066B and DOI by alpha-adrenoreceptor antagonists.     

Agonist action at 5-HT1C receptors facilitates 5-HT1A receptor-mediated spontaneous tail-flicks in the rat

In rats lightly restrained in plastic cylinders, subcutaneous administration of the selective, high efficacy 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), induced spontaneous tail-flicks, that is, tail-flicks in the absence of extraneous stimulation. The putative 5-HT1B receptor agonist, CGS 12066B, the mixed 5-HT1B/1C receptor agonists, 1-((3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]piperazine (TFMPP) and 1-(3-chlorophenyl)piperazine (mCPP), the 5-HT1C/2 receptor agonist, [+/-)-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOI) and the 5-HT1B/1C/2 receptor agonist, quipazine, did not, in contrast, elicit tail-flicks when applied alone. However, TFMPP, mCPP, DOI and quipazine, but not CGS 12066B, each potentiated the action of 8-OH-DPAT. Further, in the presence of TFMPP, mCPP and DOI, the dose-response curve for the induction of tail-flicks by 8-OH-DPAT was both steeper and shifted to the left. Tail-flicks induced by another high efficacy 5-HT1A receptor agonist, lisuride, were also enhanced by TFMPP, mCPP and DOI. The 5-HT1A receptor partial agonists, buspirone and (+/-)-flesinoxan, evoked tail-flicks only in the presence of TFMPP, mCPP or DOI. The mixed 5-HT1C/2 receptor antagonists, ritanserin and ICI 169,369, did not modify the action of 8-OH-DPAT alone but abolished the potentiation of 8-OH-DPAT-induced tail-flicks by DOI and TFMPP. Further, the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, BMY 7378, blocked tail-flicks induced by both 8-OH-DPAT alone and 8-OH-DPAT plus DOI or TFMPP. A common property of those drugs potentiating 8-OH-DPAT-induced tail-flicks is an agonist action at 5-HT1C receptors and the data indicate that it is this mechanism which underlies the facilitation of tail-flicks.     

5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor agonists and aggression: a pharmacological challenge of the serotonin deficiency hypothesis

More than any other brain neurotransmitter system, the indolamine serotonin (5-HT) has been linked to aggression in a wide and diverse range of species, including humans. The nature of this linkage, however, is not simple and it has proven difficult to unravel the precise role of this amine in the predisposition for and execution of aggressive behavior. The dogmatic view that 5-HT inhibits aggression has dominated both pharmacological research strategies to develop specific and effective novel drug treatments that reduce aggressive behavior and the pharmacological mechanistic interpretation of putative serenic drug effects. Our studies on brain serotonin and aggression in feral wild-type rats using the resident-intruder paradigm have challenged this so-called serotonin deficiency hypothesis of aggressive behavior. The well-known fact that certain 5-HT(1A/1B) receptor agonists potently and specifically reduce aggressive behavior without motor slowing and sedative effects is only consistent with this hypothesis under the assumption that the agonist mainly acts on the postsynaptic 5-HT(1A/1B) receptor sites. However, systemic injections of anti-aggressive doses of 5-HT(1A) and (1B) agonists robustly decrease brain 5-HT release due to their inhibitory actions at somatodendritic and terminal autoreceptors, respectively. The availability of the novel benzodioxopiperazine compound S-15535, which acts in vivo as a preferential agonist of the somatodendritic 5-HT(1A) auto-receptor and as an antagonist (weak partial agonist) at postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors, allows for a pharmacological analysis of the exact site of action of this anti-aggressive effect. It was found that, similar to other prototypical full and partial 5-HT(1A) and/or 5-HT(1B) receptor agonists like repinotan, 8-OHDPAT, ipsapirone, buspirone, alnespirone, eltoprazine, CGS-12066B and CP-93129, also S-15535 very effectively reduced offensive aggressive behavior. Unlike the other ligands, however, a remarkable degree of behavioral specificity was observed after treatment with S-15535, in that the anti-aggressive effects were not accompanied by inhibiting (like other 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist with moderate to high efficacy at postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors) or enhancing (like agonists with activity at 5-HT(1B) receptors and alnespirone) non-aggressive motor behaviors (e.g., social exploration, ambulation, rearing, and grooming) beyond the range of undrugged animals with corresponding levels of aggression. The involvement of 5-HT(1A) and/or 5-HT(1B) receptors in the anti-aggressive actions of these drugs was convincingly confirmed by showing that the selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY-100635 and/or the 5-HT(1B) receptor antagonist GR-127935, while inactive when given alone, effectively attenuated/prevented these actions. Furthermore, combined administration of S-15535 with either alnespirone or CGS-42066B elicited a clear additive effect, indicated by a left-ward shift in their dose-effect curves, providing further support for presynaptic sites of action (i.e., inhibitory somatodendritic 5-HT(1A) and terminal 5-HT(1B) autoreceptors). These findings strongly suggest that the specific anti-aggressive effects of 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(1B) receptor agonists are predominantly based on reduction rather than enhancement of 5-HT neurotransmission during the combative social interaction. Apparently, normal display of offensive aggressive behavior is positively related to brief spikes in serotonergic activity, whereas an inverse relationship probably exists between tonic 5-HT activity and abnormal forms of aggression only.     

Chronic fluoxetine-induced desensitization of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B autoreceptors: regional differences and effects of WAY-100635

Desensitization of 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(1B) autoreceptors is thought to be the mechanism underlying the therapeutic effects of fluoxetine and other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors when these are administered chronically. The blockade of 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors occurring on administration of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor together with a 5-HT(1A) autoreceptor antagonist is responsible for the acute increase in 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin, 5-HT) levels observed under these circumstances. The effects of repeated administration of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors together with 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists have not been widely studied. In this work, we found that the effects of fluoxetine (5 mg/kg, i.p., daily for 12 days) to desensitize 5-HT(1B) autoreceptors in the frontal cortex, as measured by the effect of the locally administered 5-HT(1B) receptor agonist, 3-(1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyrid-4-yl)pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyrid-5-one (CP 93129), and to desensitize 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors as measured by the action of the 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin (8-OH-DPAT; 50 microg/kg, s.c.) to reduce 5-HT levels in cortex, were prevented by concomitant administration of the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist, N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexanecarboxamide (WAY-100635; 0.3 mg/kg, s.c.). 5-HT(1B) receptor activity in the hypothalamus, as measured by the effects of locally administered CP 93129, and 5-HT(1A) autoreceptor activity, as determined by the effects of subcutaneous 8-OH-DPAT to reduce 5-HT levels in hypothalamus, were not altered either by fluoxetine alone or by fluoxetine in the presence of WAY-100635. The data suggest that the regulation of extracellular levels of 5-HT in the cortex and hypothalamus is subject to different autoregulatory mechanisms.     

m-CPP hypolocomotion is selectively antagonized by compounds with high affinity for 5-HT(2C) receptors but not 5-HT(2A) or 5-HT(2B) receptors

The ability of m-CPP [1-(m-chlorophenyl)piperazine] to produce hypolocomotion is well documented. This effect has been postulated to be due to activation of the 5-HT(2C) receptor. It is only recently that the tools necessary to clearly delineate which serotonin receptors are involved in the mediation of m-CPP hypolocomotion have become available. We investigated the effects of the selective 5-HT(2A) antagonists, MDL 100,907 and ketanserin, the selective 5-HT(2B) antagonists, LY 202146 and LY 266097, the 5-HT(2B/2C) antagonist, SB 206553, and the selective 5-HT(2C) antagonist, SB 242084 on m-CPP-induced hypolocomotion and spontaneous locomotor activity in mice. Furthermore, we investigated the effects of the non-selective serotonin antagonists, ritanserin, LY 53857, mianserin and cyproheptadine on m-CPP hypolocomotion. Additionally, receptor-binding studies were employed as an in vitro assessment of relative affinities at the 5-HT(2A), 5-HT92B) and 5-HT(2C) receptors. Antagonists tested alone were without effect on spontaneous activity, with the sole exception of ketanserin, which decreased spontaneous activity at the high dose of 1 mg/kg. m-CPP-induced hypolocomotion was not significantly attenuated by various doses of MDL 100,907, ketanserin, LY 202146, LY 266097, ritanserin or cyproheptadine. In contrast, SB 206553, SB 242084, LY 53857 and mianserin were capable of reversing m-CPP-induced hypolocomotion. Consistent with previous suggestions, a detailed pharmacological evaluation with selective antagonists for the 5-HT2 family of receptors supports a primary role for the 5-HT(2C) receptor, and not 5-HT(2A) or 5-HT(2B) receptors, in mediating the hypolocomotion produced by m-CPP.     

Behavioral effects of dipropyltryptamine in rats: evidence for 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A agonist activity

These studies investigated the role of serotonin-1A (5-HT1A) and 5-HT2A receptors in the behavioral effects of dipropyltryptamine (DPT). Eight rats discriminated 0.56 mg/kg 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM) from saline and responded under a fixed ratio 5 schedule of food presentation; 12 other rats were used for observational studies. DOM and DPT increased responding on the DOM lever with 3.2 mg/kg DPT producing greater than 95% responding on the DOM lever; this effect of DPT was antagonized by the 5-HT2A receptor antagonist MDL100907. In another study, the 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT produced lower-lip retraction and, at larger doses, flat body posture; DPT alone produced flat body posture and not lower-lip retraction; MDL100907 alone did not produce either effect. Pretreatment with DPT blocked 8-OH-DPAT-elicited lower-lip retraction, suggesting antagonist activity of DPT at 5-HT1A receptors; however, in the presence of MDL100907 DPT produced not only flat body posture but also lower-lip retraction, suggesting that agonist activity of DPT at 5-HT2A receptors masked agonist activity at 5-HT1A receptors. Lower-lip retraction and flat body posture by DPT in the presence of MDL100907 were attenuated by the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY100635. These findings suggest that DPT has agonist activity at 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors and that effects at 5-HT2A receptors mask effects at 5-HT1A receptors.     

Implication of 5-HT(2B) receptors in the serotonin syndrome

The serotonin (5-HT) syndrome occurs in humans after antidepressant overdose or combination of drugs inducing a massive increase in extracellular 5-HT. Several 5-HT receptors are known to participate in this syndrome in humans and animal models. The 5-HT_2B receptor has been proposed as a positive modulator of serotonergic activity, but whether it is involved in 5-HT syndrome has not yet been studied.We analyzed here, a putative role of 5-HT_2B receptors in this disorder by forced swimming test (FST) and behavioral assessment in the open field. In FST, genetic (5-HT_2B^−/− mice) or pharmacological (antagonist RS127445 at 0.5 mg/kg) ablation of 5-HT_2B receptors facilitated selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitors (SSRI)-induced increase of immobility time as well as expression of other symptoms related to 5-HT syndrome like hind limb abduction and Straub tail. Increase in immobility was also developed in FST by both wild type (WT) and 5-HT_2B^−/− mice after the administration of 5-HT_1A, 5-HT_2A or 5-HT_2C receptor agonists, 8-OH-DPAT (5 mg/kg), DOI (1 mg/kg), or WAY161503 (5 mg/kg), respectively. In contrast, the 5-HT_2B receptor agonist BW723C86 (3 mg/kg) or 5-HT_1B receptor agonist CGS12066A (2 mg/kg) decreased immobility time in both genotypes. The 5-HT syndrome induced by fluoxetine at high doses was blocked in WT and 5-HT_2B^−/− mice by administration of 5-HT_1A and 5-HT_2C receptor antagonists (WAY100635 0.5 mg/kg and SB242084 0.5 mg/kg) but not by the 5-HT_2A receptor antagonist MDL100907 (1 mg/kg). By behavioral assessment, we confirmed that 5-HT_2B^−/− mice were more prone to develop 5-HT syndrome symptoms after administration of high dose of SSRIs or the 5-HT precursor 5-Hydroxytryptophan, 5-HTP, even if increases in 5-HT plasma levels were similar in both genotypes.This evidence suggests that the presence of 5-HT_2B receptors hinders acute 5-HT toxicity once high levels of 5-HT are attained. Therefore, differential agonism/antagonism of 5-HT receptors should be considered in the search of therapeutic targets for treating this serious disorder.     

Some pharmacological properties of new analogs of MP 3022, the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist

Two new analogs of full 5-HT1A receptor antagonist 4-[3-(1-benzotriazolyl)propyl]-1-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazine (MP 3022; 1) containing di- (5) or tetramethylene- (6) spacer were synthesized. In the radioligand binding studies, compounds 5 and 6 showed high 5-HT1A (Ki = 14.7 nM and 11.8 nM, respectively) and low 5-HT2 receptor affinity (Ki = 2,696 nM and 389.2 nM, respectively). In behavioral studies both compounds behaved like postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptor antagonists as they reduced lower lip retraction and behavioral syndrome induced by 8-OH-DPAT (5-HT1A receptor agonist) in rats, but 6 was more effective in these tests. Derivative 5 did not affect body temperature in mice, whereas 6 decreased it. Furthermore, 5 did not change hypothermia induced by 8-OH-DPAT, and 6-induced lowering of body temperature in mice was not antagonized by (S)-WAY 100135 (5-HT1A antagonist), so in that model 5 and 6 did not behave as antagonist or agonist, respectively, at presynaptic 5-HT1A receptors. Compound 6 was studied in behavioral tests used to predict a potential anxiolytic (conflict drinking test in rats) and antidepressant (forced swimming test in rats) activity. Diazepam and imipramine were used as reference drugs. Compound 6 significantly increased the number of shocks accepted in water-deprived rats in conflict drinking test and shortened the immobility time in forced swimming test in rats. The above findings indicate that new 5-HT1A postsynaptic antagonist 6 behaves like anxiolytic and antidepressant, but mechanisms of these properties of 6 remain unknown.     

Pharmacological characterization of 5-HT(1B) receptor-mediated inhibition of local excitatory synaptic transmission in the CA1 region of rat hippocampus

1 In the hippocampus, axon collaterals of CA1 pyramidal cells project locally onto neighbouring CA1 pyramidal cells and interneurones, forming a local excitatory network which, in disinhibited conditions, feeds polysynaptic epscs (poly-epscs). 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) has been shown to inhibit poly-epscs through activation of a presynaptic receptor. The aim of the present work was the pharmacological characterization of the 5-HT receptor involved in this 5-HT action. 2 Poly-epscs, evoked by electrical stimulation of the stratum radiatum and recorded in whole-cell voltage-clamp from CA1 pyramidal neurones, were studied in mini-slices of the CA1 region under pharmacological block of GABA(A), GABA(B), and 5-HT(1A) receptors. 3 The 5-HT(1B) receptor selective agonist 1,4-dihydro-3-(1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-4-pyridinyl)-5H-pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyridin-5-one dihydrochloride (CP 93129) inhibited poly-epscs (EC(50)=55 nM), an effect mimicked by the 5-HT(1B) ligands 5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT; EC(50)=14 nM) and methylergometrine (EC(50)=78 nM), but not by 1-(3-chlorophenyl)piperazine dihydrochloride (mCPP; 10 micro M) or 7-trifluoromethyl-4(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)-pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoxaline dimaleate (CGS 12066B; 10 micro M). 4 The effects of CP 93129 and 5-CT were blocked by the selective 5-HT(1B) receptor antagonist 3-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-4-hydroxy-N-[4-(4-pyridinyl)phenyl]benzamide dihydrochloride (GR 55562; K(B) approximately 100 nM) and by cyanopindolol (K(B)=6 nM); methiothepin (10 micro M) and dihydroergotamine (1 micro M). For both GR 55562 and methiothepin, application times of at least two hours were required in order to achieve their full antagonistic effects. 5 Our results demonstrate that 5-HT(1B) receptors are responsible for the presynaptic inhibition of neurotransmission at CA1/CA1 local excitatory synapses exerted by 5-HT.     

A novel behavioral model that discriminates between 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptor activation

2,5-Dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI), a serotonin (5-HT)2A/2C receptor agonist, elicits shaking behaviors in rodents, which have been reliably quantified as behavioral correlates of 5-HT2A receptor activation. Such studies are lacking in the rabbit. As part of our research examining the role of the 5-HT2 receptor in rabbits, we analyzed the behavioral effects of systemically administered DOI in rabbits. DOI (0.01-3 micromol/kg) or vehicle was injected, and two distinct behaviors, head bobs (vertical head movements) and body shakes (wet dog shakes), were counted for 90 min following the injection. DOI dose-dependently increased the number of head bobs and body shakes. The selective 5-HT2A receptor antagonist ketanserin (1-3 micromol/kg), 1 h before DOI (0.3 micromol/kg) challenge, significantly attenuated head bobs, but not body shakes. In contrast, the selective 5-HT2C receptor antagonists SDZ SER 082 (1-3 micromol/kg) and SB 206553 (1 micromol/kg) 30 min before challenge, significantly reduced body shakes but not head bobs produced by the same dose of DOI. This study establishes that, in rabbits, DOI mediates head bobs via 5-HT2A receptors and body shakes via 5-HT2C receptors. Thus, the rabbit provides a novel behavioral assay that discriminates between 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptor activation.     

Role of 5-HT1B, 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors in the generalization of 5-HT receptor agonists to the ethanol cue in the rat

Although accumulating evidence suggests that serotonergic drugs are able to substitute for the ethanol (EtOH) cue in rats, it is still unclear which 5-HT receptor subtypes are responsible for this phenomenon, and whether these receptors are critically involved in the EtOH cue. In the present study, rats were trained to discriminate EtOH (1000 mg/kg, i.p., t-15 min) from saline in a two-lever food-reinforced procedure, and it was investigated to which extent serotonergic compounds with a certain level of specificity for either 5-HT1B, 5-HT2A or 5-HT2C receptors generalized to the EtOH cue. Subsequently, the involvement of these receptor subtypes was ascertained by the use of selected 5-HT receptor antagonists. The 5-HT1B receptor agonist CP 94,253 (0.3-5 mg/kg, i.p.) and the mixed 5-HT(2C/1B) receptor agonist mCPP (0.1-1 mg/kg, i.p.), but not the preferential 5-HT2A receptor agonist DOI (0.3-1 mg/kg, i.p.), completely generalized to the EtOH cue. Complete generalization of the former two compounds coincided with a decrease in response rate. In antagonism studies, it was shown that the 5-HT1B receptor antagonist GR 127935 (10 mg/kg, i.p.) completely blocked generalization of CP 94,253 to the EtOH cue, suggesting that stimulation of 5-HT1B receptors produces discriminative stimulus effects which are similar to those of EtOH. GR 127935 (10 mg/kg, i.p.), as well as the mixed 5-HT(1B/2C) receptor antagonist metergoline (1 mg/kg, i.p.), and the 5-HT2C receptor antagonist SB 206,553 (1 mg/kg, i.p.) completely blocked generalization of mCPP to the EtOH cue. This suggests that 5-HT1B and 5-HT2C receptors are required for the generalization of mCPP to the EtOH cue. The present findings indicate that activation of 5-HT1B and 5-HT2C, but not of 5-HT2A receptors, mimics the EtOH cue. However, the finding that neither metergoline, nor the 5-HT2A receptor antagonist MDL 100,907 blocked the EtOH cue, suggests that these receptors play only a minor role in the discriminative stimulus effects of a moderately low dose of EtOH.     

Serotonin 5-HT1-like receptors mediate hyperactivity in rats induced by 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine.

This study was designed to evaluate the role of different serotonin (5-HT) receptor subtypes in mediating the effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) on rat exploration of a novel environment. The active enantiomer of MDMA, S-MDMA increases forward locomotion and suppresses investigatory behaviors and local movements. Previous studies indicate that S-MDMA-induced hyperactivity depends upon drug-induced 5-HT release. Propranolol and pindolol, beta-noradrenergic antagonists with affinity for 5-HT1 receptors, antagonized the S-MDMA-induced locomotor hyperactivity. The antagonism by propranolol was stereoselective. In contrast, a beta-noradrenergic antagonist that is a weaker antagonist of 5-HT receptors, betaxolol, was much less effective at blocking the behavioral response to S-MDMA. Among nonselective 5-HT antagonists, methiothepin was effective and methysergide and cyproheptadine were ineffective as antagonists of S-MDMA-induced hypermotility. In other systems, methiothepin has been found to be a good antagonist at 5-HT1B receptors where methysergide and cyproheptadine are ineffective. The 5-HT2 antagonist ritanserin was ineffective in blocking S-MDMA-induced hypermotility. However, ritanserin, methysergide, and cyproheptadine partially reversed the S-MDMA-induced suppression of investigatory responding, suggesting a contribution of 5-HT2 receptor activation to this component of the behavioral response to S-MDMA. This study indicates that S-MDMA produces a characteristic form of locomotor hyperactivity in rats that depends upon activation of 5-HT1-like receptors, possibly of the 5-HT1B subtype.     

Enhancement of 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptor antagonist effects on extracellular 5-HT levels in the guinea-pig brain following concurrent 5-HT1A or 5-HT re-uptake site blockade.

The effects of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI), paroxetine, and 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B and 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonists on in vivo extracellular 5-HT levels in the guinea-pig frontal cortex and dorsal hippocampus were investigated using the technique of microdialysis. The aim of the study was to further investigate the autoreceptor roles of the 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors in the median vs dorsal raphe nuclei. In the frontal cortex, 5-HT1A (WAY 100635, 1 mg/kg i.p.) or 5-HT1B (SB-224289, 4 mg/kg i.p.) receptor antagonists had no effect on extracellular levels of 5-HT, whilst the mixed 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist (GR 127935, 0.3 mg/kg i.p) produced a significant decrease in extracellular 5-HT levels. Paroxetine (10 microM) significantly increased extracellular 5-HT levels when perfused locally into the cortex. Administration of SB-224289, followed 120 min later by WAY 100635, had no effect on extracellular 5-HT levels. In contrast, sequential administration of either WAY 100635 and GR 127935, or SB-224289 and paroxetine significantly increased extracellular 5-HT levels. In the dorsal hippocampus, whilst 5-HT1A receptor antagonism elicited by administration of WAY 100635 had no effect, both 5-HT1B and mixed 5-HT1B/1D receptor blockade significantly increased extracellular 5-HT levels. Administration of SB-224289 followed 120 min later with WAY 100635, or WAY 100635 followed 30 min later with GR 127935, potentiated the effect of the three compounds alone, significantly increasing extracellular 5-HT levels. These data demonstrate that to simultaneously increase extracellular 5-HT in both frontal cortex and dorsal hippocampus of the guinea-pig brain concurrent 5-HTA1A, 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptor blockade is required. Whereas in the dorsal hippocampus, 5-HT1B receptor blockade is sufficient to elicit an increase in extracellular 5-HT levels.     

Synthesis, 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor activity of new 1-phenylpiperazinylpropyl derivatives with arylalkyl substituents in position 7 of purine-2,6-dione

A series of new 1,3-dimethyl-7-phenylalkyl-8-[3-(4-phenyl-1-piperazinyl)propylamino]-purine-2,6-dione derivatives (10-16) was synthesized and their 5-HTIA and 5-HT2A receptor affinities were determined. It was found that compounds with the phenylpropyl substituent in position 7 of purine-2,6-dione (12, 14 and 16), or with phenylmethyl in position 7 and 2-OCH3 in the phenylpiperazine part (13) showed a distinct affinity for 5-HTIA receptors (Ki = 8-50 nM). No structural modifications resulted in 5-HT2A ligands, since the affinity of 10-16 for those receptors was insignificant (Ki = 115-550 nM). The new 5-HT1A receptor ligands (12-14, 16) were investigated in vivo to determine their functional activity at those receptors. In behavioral studies, 12-14 and 16 behaved like postsynaptic 5-HTIA receptor antagonists, since they reduced lower lip retraction and the behavioral syndrome induced by 8-OH-DPAT (5-HT1A receptor agonist) in rats. When given alone, none of the compounds investigated in vivo, mimicked 8-OH-DPAT activity in those tests. Derivative 12 did not affect the body temperature in mice, whereas 13, 14 and 16 decreased it. Furthermore, 12 did not change the hypothermia induced by 8-OH-DPAT, and the decrease in body temperature in mice induced by 13, 14 or 16 was not antagonized by WAY 100635 (5-HT1A receptor antagonist); hence in that model neither 12, 13, 14 nor 16 acted as antagonists or agonists, respectively, at presynaptic 5-HT1A receptors.     

Interaction of arylpiperazines with 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, 5-HT1C and 5-HT1D receptors: do discriminatory 5-HT1B receptor ligands exist?

Summary The effects of several putative 5-HT₁ receptorsubtype selective ligands were investigated in biochemical models for 5-HT_1A, 5-HT_1B, and 5-HT_1D receptors (inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in calf hippocampus, rat and calf substantia nigra, respectively) and 5-HT_1C receptors (stimulation of inositol phosphates production in pig choroid plexus). Following compounds were studied: 5-HT (5-hydroxytryptamine), TFMPP (1-(mtrifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine), mCPP (1-m-chlorophe-nyl)piperazine, 1 CGS 12066 (7-trifluoromethyl-4-(4-methyl1-piperazinyl)-pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoxaline 1), isamoltane (CGP 361A, 1-(2-(1-pyrrolyl)-phenoxy)-3-isopropylamino-2-propranol), quipazine, 1-NP (1-(1-naphthyl)piperazine), and PAPP (LY165163, 1-[2-(4-aminophenyl)ethyl]-4-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)-piperazine). Among reported 5-HT_1B receptor selective drugs, TFMPP had similar potency at 5HT_1A, 5-HT_1B and 5-HT_1C receptors, mCPP did not separate between 5-HT_1B and 5-HT_1C receptors, CGS 12066 was equipotent at 5-HT_1B and 5-HT_1D receptors, and isamoltane was only slightly 5-HTIB versus 5-HT_1A selective. Quipazine showed equal potency at 5-HTIB and 5-HT_1C receptors and 1-NP did not discriminate between the four receptor subtypes. PAPP described as 5-HT_1A receptor selective, was equally potent at 5-HT_1A and 5-HT_1D receptors. The potencies determined in second messenger studies were in good agreement with the affinity values determined in radioligand binding studies. Thus 5-HT_1A, 5-HT_1B, 5-HT_1C and 5-HT_1D receptors have different pharmacological profiles as predicted from radioligand binding studies. Despite claims to the contrary, none of the tested compounds had actual selectivity for a given 5-HT₁ receptor subtype. Of interest were the properties of several of these drugs, which behaved as agonists at some receptors and as antagonists at others (e. g. quipazine, 1-NP, PAPP and isamoltane). Send offprint requests to D. Hoyer at the above address     

The hypothermic effect of 5-CT in mice is mediated through the 5-HT7 receptor

The 5-HT(7) receptor is a recent addition to the 5-HT receptor family and to date there is no clear idea as to its potential role in the CNS. The receptor has been mapped by in situ hybridization and 5-HT(7)-like immunoreactivity and has been detected in discrete areas of the brain including the hypothalamus (Oliver et al., 1999). This suggests the receptor may be involved in temperature regulation and have shown that a selective 5-HT(7) receptor antagonist reverses the hypothermic effect of 5-CT in guinea-pigs. The current study confirmed that the 5-HT(7) receptor antagonists, SB-269970 (1-30 mg/kg, i.p.) and SB-258719 (5-20 mg/kg, i.p.), but not the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist, WAY 100635(0.1-1 mg/kg, s.c.), or the 5-HT(1B/D) antagonist, GR127935 (1.25-5 mg/kg, i.p.), reversed the hypothermic effect of 5-CT in mice. In addition the effect of 5-CT on body temperature was examined on 5-HT(7) receptor null mutant mice. 5-CT (0.1-1 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly reduced rectal temperature in wildtype but not 5-HT(7) receptor knockout mice. This suggests that the hypothermic effects of 5-CT are mediated through the 5-HT(7) receptor. All procedures were carried out in accordance with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act (1986).     

Augmentation with a 5-HT(1A), but not a 5-HT(1B) receptor antagonist critically depends on the dose of citalopram

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-5-phtalancarbonitril (citalopram) were determined in order to find optimal conditions for augmentation of its effect on extracellular serotonin [5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)] through blockade of 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(1B) autoreceptors. Citalopram dose-dependently (0.3-10 micromol/kg s.c.) increased serotonin levels in ventral hippocampus of conscious rats. At plasma levels above approximately 0.15 microM, the effect of citalopram on extracellular 5-HT was augmented by both a 5-HT(1A) [N-[2-[4-(2-mehoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridil) cyclohexa necarboxamide trihydrochloride (Way 100635), 1 micromol/kg s.c.] and a 5-HT(1B) receptor antagonist (2'-methyl-4'-(5-methyl-[1,2, 4]oxadiazol-3-yl)biphenyl-4-carboxylic acid [4-methoxy]-3-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)phenyl]amide (GR 127935), 1 micromol/kg s.c.). However, at plasma levels of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor below 0.15 microM, the effects of the antagonists diverged viz. the 5-HT(1B) receptor antagonist was still able to potentiate citalopram's effect on extracellular 5-HT, while the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist was no longer effective. These results suggest that in contrast to 5-HT(1B) autoreceptors, indirect activation of 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors by citalopram is critically related to the dose of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor administered. The latter may have consequences for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor augmentation strategies with 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists in the therapy of depression and anxiety disorders.