Minimum ten-year results of a 28-mm metal-on-metal bearing in cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients fifty years of age and younger

Purpose

Concerns have been raised in relation to metal-on-metal (MoM) articulations with catastrophic soft-tissue reactions due to metal debris. We reviewed how small head MoM articulations perform in primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young patients at a minimum of ten years.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and radiographic results of the first 100 consecutive primary cementless THAs using the 28-mm Metasul MoM articulation in 91 patients younger than 50 years of age at the time of surgery.

Results

After 13 years, survival for the endpoint revision due to any reason was 90.9 % and 98.9 % for revision due to aseptic implant loosening. The cumulative incidence of MoM related revisions was 1.2 %. Small proximal femoral osteolysis was found in 18 % of hips. No acetabular osteolysis or loosening was detected. Two hips showed signs of femoral neck impingement with severe damage to the neck.

Conclusions

Early in the second decade, MoM-associated complications were rare using the 28-mm Metasul articulation, and aseptic loosening was not a major mode of failure in this cohort of young patients.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic Level IV.     

Long-Term Outcomes After Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty With a 28-mm Head: A 17- to 23-Year Follow-Up Study of a Previous Report

Background

Second-generation, metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (MoM THA) using a 28-mm head has shown favorable results compared with large head MoM THA. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcomes of cementless primary MoM THA with a 28-mm head and the incidence of osteolysis using computed tomography.

Immunologic Adverse Reaction Associated with Low-carbide Metal-on-metal Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

An increased incidence of periprosthetic osteolysis, resulting in loss of biologic fixation, has been reported in contemporary THAs with low-carbide metal-on-metal compared with metal-on-polyethylene couple bearings. Although a hypersensitivity reaction attributable to Co and Cr debris is reportedly a potential cause for failure of THAs with high-carbide bearings, there are no evidence-based data for this reaction in low-carbide metal-on-metal bearings, although such hypersensitivity might be related to osteolysis.

Questions/purposes

We investigated whether there were differences in immunologic hypersensitivity reactions in retrievals from revised THAs with ceramic-on-polyethylene versus metal-on-metal bearing couples.

Patients and Methods

We compared newly formed capsule and periprosthetic interface membranes from revision surgery for aseptic failure from 20 patients with low-carbide bearings and 13 patients with ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings. For control tissue, we obtained samples from the hip capsule during the primary THA implantation in 13 patients with low-carbide bearings and seven with ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings. We examined the tissues with conventional histologic and immunohistochemical methods.

Results

Compared with tissue from the control subjects and patients with ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings, the tissues from patients with low-carbide metal-on-metal bearings were associated with (1) extensive necrosis and fibrin exudation in the newly formed hip capsule and (2) diffuse and perivascular lymphocytic infiltration of a higher degree than in the hips with ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings in conventional histologic examination, and (3) more T than B cells.

Conclusions

The conventional histologic and immunohistochemical findings in tissues retrieved from failed THAs with low-carbide metal-on-metal bearings are consistent with a link between hypersensitivity and osteolysis with low-carbide bearing couples.     

Cross-sectional imaging of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: Can we substitute MARS MRI with CT?

Background and purpose —

Metal artifact reduction sequence (MARS) MRI is widely advocated for surveillance of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties (MOM-HAs). However, its use is limited by susceptibility artifact at the prosthesis-bone interface, local availability, patient compliance, and cost (Hayter et al. 2011a). We wanted to determine whether CT is a suitable substitute for MARS MRI in evaluation of the painful MOM-HA.

Patients and methods —

50 MOM-HA patients (30 female) with unexplained painful prostheses underwent MARS MRI and CT imaging. 2 observers who were blind regarding the clinical data objectively reported the following outcomes: soft tissue lesions (pseudotumors), muscle atrophy, and acetabular and femoral osteolysis. Diagnostic test characteristics were calculated.

Results —

Pseudotumor was diagnosed in 25 of 50 hips by MARS MRI and in 11 of 50 by CT. Pseudotumors were classified as type 1 (n = 2), type 2A (n = 17), type 2B (n = 4), and type 3 (n = 2) by MARS MRI. CT did not permit pseudotumor classification. The sensitivity of CT for diagnosis of pseudotumor was 44% (95% CI: 25–65). CT had “slight” agreement with MARS MRI for quantification of muscle atrophy (κ = 0.23, CI: 0.16–0.29; p < 0.01). Osteolysis was identified in 15 of 50 patients by CT. 4 of these lesions were identified by MARS MRI.

Interpretation —

CT was found to be superior to MRI for detection of osteolysis adjacent to MOM-HA, and should be incorporated into diagnostic algorithms. CT was unable to classify and failed to detect many pseudotumors, and it was unreliable for assessment of muscle atrophy. Where MARS MRI is contraindicated or unavailable, CT would be an unsuitable substitute and other modalities such as ultrasound should be consideredIt is estimated that over 500,000 metal-on-metal (MOM) hip arthroplasties, including both hip resurfacing and total hip replacements (THRs), have been carried out worldwide in the last 15 years (Skinner et al. 2010). There are increasing reports of progressive soft tissue changes in response to metal debris including: solid or cystic, non-malignant masses around the prostheses (termed pseudotumors) (Pandit et al. 2008), perivascular lymphocytic infiltration (Davies et al. 2005), musculotendinous pathology (in particular, wasting of the hip abductors) (Sabah et al. 2011), and periprosthetic osteolysis (Park et al. 2005, Milosev et al. 2006, Korovessis et al. 2006).There is international agreement that the high failure rate of MOM hip arthroplasties (MOM-HAs) has created the need for surveillance of these devices with cross-sectional imaging (MHRA. 2012). Both pseudotumors and muscle atrophy have been associated with high rates of major complications and poorer outcomes after revision surgery (Grammatopolous et al. 2009). To this end, sensitive detection of periprosthetic changes is vital in order to provide the best outcome for MOM-HA patients with early detection and revision.Cross-sectional imaging has been shown to be useful for providing a diagnosis in cases of unexplained pain and in planning of revision surgery (Hayter et al. 2011b). A recent European multidisciplinary consensus statement recommended the use of cross-sectional imaging using any of US, MARS MRI, or CT (Hannemann et al. 2013). The gold standard modality is not clear, which has resulted in a variety of diagnostic algorithms being used in different referral centers.Both CT and MARS MRI similarly offer multi-planar and complete cross-sectional images from which the extent of disease and relationship of the abnormality to normal anatomy can readily be appreciated. MARS MRI has been reliably and extensively used to investigate MOM hip complications (Sabah et al. 2011, Hayter et al. 2012a, Thomas et al. 2013, Nawabi et al. 2013) and has been shown to permit early diagnosis of pseudotumor and other soft tissue pathologies (Toms et al. 2008) associated with pain, loss of function, and higher revision rates. However, the use of MARS MRI is limited by susceptibility artifact at the prosthesis-bone interface, local availability, patient compliance, and cost.CT is more widely available than MARS MRI (Anderson et al. 2011) and has been used routinely at some centers for the screening of periarticular masses (Bosker et al. 2012). It has been proposed as an alternative to it, for example in cases of claustrophobia, pacemaker, and where there are loose metal implants. CT has been shown to be useful in cases of suspected impingement, acetabular osteolysis (Cahir et al. 2007, Roth et al. 2012), and in identification of prostheses at risk of elevated wear (Hart et al. 2009). The notable success in detecting common complications of hip arthroplasty coupled with widespread accessibility has meant that some centers rely entirely on CT (McMinn. 2012) to follow up patients with suspected MOM-associated bony and soft tissue changes, but to date there have been no published studies comparing CT with MRI.We investigated whether CT is a suitable substitute for MARS MRI in the evaluation of the painful MOM-HA. We wanted to provide measures of diagnostic accuracy of CT compared to the current gold standard (MARS MRI) for the detection of common periprosthetic complications. The primary outcome measure focused on the detection of pseudotumors, owing to their high prevalence and strong association with adverse outcomes (Hart et al. 2009), with secondary outcome measures for the detection of muscle atrophy and osteolysis.     

MARS MRI Characteristics of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions in Taper Corrosion of Metal-On-Polyethylene THA Differ From Metal-On-Metal THA

BackgroundMetal artifact reduction sequence (MARS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been recommended as a cross-sectional imaging modality in clinical evaluation of adverse local tissue reactions (ALTRs) in metal-on-metal (MoM) patients and metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) patients with taper corrosion. The aim of the study was to compare MARS MRI characteristics of ALTR in MoM total hip arthroplasty (THA) with ALTR in MoP THA with modular taper corrosion.MethodsA total of 197 patients with ALTR were evaluated: 86 patients with MoM THA; 37 MoP patients with head-neck taper corrosion; and 74 MoP patients with neck-stem dual taper corrosion. MARS MRI scans were evaluated to identify location, size, type of ALTR (I-III), and associated ALTR synovitis (cystic, solid, and mixed).ResultsMARS MRI characteristics of ALTR were significantly different between the MoM and MoP groups (P = .017). The MoP group demonstrated the highest proportion of thick-walled cystic masses type II (56.7% in head-neck taper corrosion MoP and 46.5% in dual taper corrosion MoP vs 28.7% in MoM), whereas the MoM group had the highest proportion of thin-walled cystic masses type I. MoM implants (96.8%) were significantly more likely to have ALTR in multiple locations compared with both MoP groups (P = .001).ConclusionThis study demonstrates that MARS MRI characteristics of ALTR differ by bearing type with a significantly higher percentage of mixed type and solid type ALTR in the taper corrosion MoP THA compared with MoM THA. This information provides clinically useful information in evaluation of symptomatic MoP and MoM THA patients for ALTRs.     

Comparison of Pre-Revision Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Operative Findings in Mechanically Assisted Crevice Corrosion in Symptomatic Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasties

Background

Failed total hip arthroplasty (THA) caused by mechanically assisted crevice corrosion (MACC) has serious consequences—notably, adverse local tissue reactions. Metal artifact reduction sequence (MARS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used to evaluate failed THA for other reasons but has not been assessed for the analysis of cases of MACC in the setting of metal-on-polyethylene arthroplasties.

Imaging Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements: the Norwich Experience

Background

Adverse reaction to metal debris is a relatively recently described and often a silent complication of metal-on-metal (MOM) total hip replacements (THR). The Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital has been performing metal artefact reduction (MARS) MRI for 8 years in a variety of different types of MOM THR.

Questions/purposes

The aims of this review are to describe the experience of using MARS MRI in Norwich and to compare our experience with that published by other groups.

Methods

A MEDLINE keyword search was performed for studies including MRI in MOM THR. Relevant publications were reviewed and compared with published data from the Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital. The similarities and differences between these data were compared and possible explanations for these discussed.

Results

MARS MRI appears to be the most useful tool for diagnosing, staging and monitoring adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). There appears to be no clinically useful association between clinical and serological markers of disease and the severity of MR findings. Although severe early ARMD is associated with significant morbidity, mild disease is often stable for years. If patients with normal initial MR examinations develop ARMD, this usually occurs 7 years. A 1-year interval between MRI examinations is reasonable in asymptomatic patients.

Conclusions

There is a general international consensus that ARMD is prevalent in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with MOM THR and that while appearances vary with the type of prosthesis, there are characteristic features that make MARS MRI essential for diagnosis, staging and surveillance of the disease.     

Higher Prevalence of Mixed or Solid Pseudotumors in Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty Compared With Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Pseudotumors are a common finding in metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) and resurfacing hip arthroplasty (RHA). However, information on pseudotumors in metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) THA is limited.

Inferior Radiographic and Functional Outcomes With Modular Stem in Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Data on the association between stem type and metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) performance are limited. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of stem type on the prevalence of osteolysis and radiolucency, blood metal ion levels, and functional outcomes in patients with Articular Surface Replacement THA (ASR XL), a type of MoM THA.

The Relationship Between Polyethylene Wear and Periprosthetic Osteolysis in Total Hip Arthroplasty at 12 Years in a Randomized Controlled Trial Cohort

Background

Polyethylene acetabular components are common in hip arthroplasty. Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) has lower wear than ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). Evidence suggests that wear particles induce inflammation causing periprosthetic osteolysis contributing to implant loosening with wear rates of 0.05 mm/y were considered safe. We aimed to compare incidence and volume of periacetabular osteolysis between HXLPE and UHMWPE using computed tomography.

Silent soft tissue pathology is common with a modern metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty

Background and purpose

Adverse reactions to metal debris have been reported to be a cause of pain in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. We assessed the incidence of both symptomatic and asymptomatic adverse reactions in a consecutive series of patients with a modern large-head metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.

Methods

We studied the early clinical results and results of routine metal artifact-reduction MRI screening in a series of 79 large-head metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties (ASR; DePuy, Leeds, UK) in 68 patients. 75 hips were MRI scanned at mean 31 (12–52) months after surgery.

Results

27 of 75 hips had MRI-detected metal debris-related abnormalities, of which 5 were mild, 18 moderate, and 4 severe. 8 of these hips have been revised, 6 of which were revised for an adverse reaction to metal debris, diagnosed preoperatively with MRI and confirmed histologically. The mean Oxford hip score (OHS) for the whole cohort was 21. It was mean 23 for patients with no MRI-based evidence of adverse reactions and 19 for those with adverse reactions detected by MRI. 6 of 12 patients with a best possible OHS of 12 had MRI-based evidence of an adverse reaction.

Interpretation

We have found a high early revision rate with a modern, large-head metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. MRI-detected adverse rections to metal debris was common and often clinically “silent”. We recommend that patients with this implant should be closely followed up and undergo routine metal artifact-reduction MRI screening.Metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip replacements have been used since the 1960s. Failure in early designs was attributed to mechanical loosening caused by poor bearing tolerances producing high friction (Amstutz and Grigoris 1996, Kothari et al. 1996). Improved manufacturing and engineering techniques enabled the development of a new generation of MoM hip replacements. In the 1990s, the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) was developed, and good early to medium-term results have been published (Daniel et al. 2004, Treacy et al. 2005, Heilpern et al. 2008). Similar implants, both resurfacings and large MoM bearings, coupled with standard femoral stems were subsequently developed and marketed by other manufacturers.The development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metal artifact reduction (MAR) sequences has enabled good visualization of the periprosthetic tissues (Toms et al. 2008), and been reported to be a clinically useful part of the assessment of painful MoM hip replacements (Hart et al. 2009). A number of authors have described the appearance of collections of fluid and inflammatory masses around painful MoM hip arthroplasties (Boardman et al. 2006, Pandit et al. 2008, Toms et al. 2008). These have been grouped under a variety of headings such as “aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesions” (Willert et al. 2005), “pseudotumors” (Pandit et al. 2008), or “adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD)” (Langton et al. 2010). Although these lesions have been previously described in patients investigated for pain, there have been no studies on the overall incidence of these lesions in an unselected series of patients, including those with no, or few, symptoms. It is not known whether these lesions may occur in the absence of symptoms.At our institution, we have a policy of offering routine MAR MRI imaging to patients who have undergone MoM total hip replacement or resurfacing. We determined the early clinical outcome, revision rate, and incidence of ARMD using MAR MRI screening in a consecutive series of patients with an ASR THR or resurfacing (ASR; DePuy, Leeds, UK).     

Increased risk of revision of cementless stemmed total hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings: Data from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association

Background and purpose

Data from the national joint registries in Australia and England and Wales have revealed inferior medium-term survivorship for metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) than for metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) THA. Based on data from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA), we compared the revision risk of cementless stemmed THA with MoM and MoP bearings and we also compared MoM THA to each other.

Patients and methods

We identified 32,678 patients who were operated from 2002 through 2010 with cementless stemmed THA with either MoM bearings (11,567 patients, 35%) or MoP bearings (21,111 patients, 65%). The patients were followed until revision, death, emigration, or the end of the study period (December 31, 2011), and median follow-up was 3.6 (interquartile range (IQR): 2.4–4.8) years for MoM bearings and 3.4 (IQR: 2.0–5.8) years for MoP bearings. Multivariable regression in the presence of competing risk of death was used to assess the relative risk (RR) of revision for any reason (with 95% confidence interval (CI)).

Results

The cumulative incidence of revision at 8 years of follow-up was 7.0% (CI: 6.0–8.1) for MoM bearings and 5.1% (CI: 4.7–5.6) for MoP bearings. At 6 years of follow-up, the RR of revision for any reason was 1.5 (CI: 1.3–1.7) for MoM bearings compared to MoP bearings. The RR of revision for any reason was higher for the ASR (adjusted RR = 6.4, CI: 5.0–8.1), the Conserve Plus (adjusted RR = 1.7, CI: 1.1–2.5) and “other” acetabular components (adjusted RR = 2.4, CI: 1.5–3.9) than for MoP THA at 6 years of follow-up.

Interpretation

At medium-term follow-up, the survivorship for cementless stemmed MoM THA was inferior to that for MoP THA, and metal-related problems may cause higher revision rates for MoM bearings with longer follow-up.Wear particles from the polyethylene liner in metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) bearings in total hip arthroplasty (THA) are associated with osteolysis and aseptic loosening of the implant (Jacobs et al. 1994). Surgeons therefore became interested in alternatives such as metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings. The main justification for using large-diameter-head (LDH) MoM bearings in THA was less wear and the hope of lower revision rates. However, a lower risk of revision has only been found for revision due to dislocation (Kostensalo et al. 2013), whereas the total risk of revision has been found to be increased in some studies (Smith et al. 2012, Huang et al. 2013). In addition, LDH MoM was introduced in order to achieve increased range of motion and better function (Burroughs et al. 2005, Davis et al. 2007), but that has not been shown clinically (Penny et al. 2013).Several concerns about the use of MoM bearings in hip surgery have been voiced in recent years: excessive failure rates for certain brands and implant combinations used with MoM components have been reported (Langton et al. 2011, Australian Orthopaedic Association 2013). Some designs are associated with increased frequency of aseptic loosening (Australian Orthopaedic Association 2013), and large head sizes placed on conventional stems may cause taper junction failure (Langton et al. 2012). Exposure to chromium and cobalt may cause adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) (Langton et al. 2010) such as pseudotumors (Pandit et al. 2008) and hypersensivity reactions (Willert et al. 2005) locally in the hip joint. Furthermore, metal ions may be genotoxic (Daley et al. 2004).Only a few population-based studies on MoM bearings in stemmed THAs from hip arthroplasty registries have been published (Smith et al. 2012, Mokka et al. 2013b, Furnes et al. 2014), with only 1 population-based study focusing on causes of revision resulting from specific combinations of acetabular and femoral components (Mokka et al. 2013b). We compared the 6-year revision risk for MoM bearings with that for MoP bearings in cementless stemmed THA. In addition, we studied different designs of stemmed MoM THAs and the causes of revision in a population-based follow-up study using data from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA).     

Comparison of metal on metal versus polyethylene–ceramic bearing in uncemented total hip arthroplasty in patients with haemophilic arthropathy

Purpose

We report the results of a consecutive series of 12 cases with haemophilic hip arthropathy treated with uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA). Our hypothesis was that THA results in the haemophilic group would be inferior to those in the nonhaemophilic group.

Methods

The clinical histories of 12 consecutive THAs in eight patients (all men) with hereditary bleeding disorders (haemophilia A and B and von Willebrand disease) were reviewed retrospectively. The results were compared with an age- and sex-matched control group without haemophilia, with special emphasis on bearing surfaces (Metasul metal-on-metal; polyethylene–ceramic articulation).

Results

The mean follow-up of the control group was 9.7 (range five to 24) years and was similar to the haemophilia group, with 10.4. Survival in the Metasul haemophilic group was 22.2 % after 18 years, which significantly differed from the Metasul control group (100 % after 24 years). Survival of the polyethylene–ceramic haemophilic group was similar to the control group (100 % after seven years in both groups).

Conclusions

The metal-on-metal bearing surface in patients with haemophilia gave inferior results compared with nonhaemophilic patients. The use of metal-on-metal bearings in haemophilia is debatable.