Does chronic kidney disease affect the complications and prognosis of patients after primary colorectal cancer surgery?

BACKGROUNDThe effect of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on the outcomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients after primary CRC surgery is controversial.AIMTo analyze whether CKD had specific effect on the outcomes after CRC surgery.METHODSWe searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases and CNKI, from inception to March 14, 2022. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for the quality assessment in this meta-analysis, and we used RevMan 5.3 was used for data analysis.RESULTSA total of nine studies including 47771 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. No significant difference was found in terms of overall postoperative complications [odds ratio (OR) = 1.78, 95%CI: 0.64-4.94, P = 0.27]. We analyzed the specific complications and found that the CKD group had higher rates of pulmonary infection (OR = 2.70, 95%CI: 1.82-4.00, P < 0.01), cardiovascular complications (OR = 3.39, 95%CI: 2.34-4.91, P < 0.01) and short-term death (OR = 3.01, 95%CI: 2.20-4.11, P < 0.01). After pooling the hazard ratio (HR), the CKD group had worse overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.51, 95%CI: 1.04-2.20, P = 0.03). We performed subgroup analyses of the dialysis and non-dialysis groups, and no significant difference was found in the non-dialysis group (HR = 1.20, 95%CI: 0.98-1.47, P = 0.08). The dialysis group had worse OS (HR = 3.36, 95%CI: 1.92-5.50, P < 0.01) than the non-dialysis group. The CKD group had worse disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.41, 95%CI: 1.12-1.78, P < 0.01), and in the subgroup analysis of the dialysis and non-dialysis groups, no significant difference was found in the non-dialysis group (HR = 1.27, 95%CI: 0.97-1.66, P = 0.08). The dialysis group had worse OS (HR = 1.95, 95%CI: 1.23-3.10, P < 0.01) than the non-dialysis group.CONCLUSIONPreexisting CKD was associated with higher rates of pulmonary infection, higher rates of short-term death, and worse OS and poorer DFS following CRC surgery.     

Do all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer need chemotherapy until disease progression?

The question of continuous versus intermittent chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer has been an ongoing issue of debate for determining the optimum duration of treatment. The results from 2 major trails addressing this issue were recently presented at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. The OPTIMOX2 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin reintroduction after a complete chemotherapy-free interval or maintenance therapy in patients with previously untreated disease. The GISCAD (Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer) study investigated the utility of intermittent versus continuous irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Both studies demonstrated that chemotherapy can be administered intermittently without affecting the overall efficacy of treatment.     

Meta-analysis of molecular targetted agents in the treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: does the age matter?

Aim: Patients aged 65?years and older are often under-represented in clinical trials of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and probably undertreated in clinical practice. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the efficacy of molecular targetted agents (MTAs) in this population.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search for studies published up to December 2014 was performed. The endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included trials.

Results: Eleven randomized controlled trials involved 8,488 patients were ultimately identified. The pooled analysis demonstrated that the use of MTAs in elderly patients with mCRC significantly improved OS (HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.76–0.92, p?p?=?0.017) when compared to MTAs-free therapies. Similar results of OS were observed in sub-group analysis according to treatment line and regimes. No publication bias was detected by Begg's and Egger's tests.

Conclusions: The introduction of MTAs to therapies offers a survival benefit in elderly patients with mCRC. Further studies aimed at this specific patient population are still needed to monitor potential treatment-related toxicities to optimize the use of these drugs.     

Is regorafenib providing clinically meaningful benefits to pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer?

Treatment with regorafenib has demonstrated statistically significant improvements in terms of overall survival, progression-free survival and disease control when compared with placebo in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in two placebo-controlled, randomized, phase III trials (CORRECT and CONCUR). Similar results were observed in two open-label, single-arm studies (REBECCA and CONSIGN) performed in the real-world setting. But several authors have suggested that the benefit provided by regorafenib may not be clinically meaningful for these patients. Moreover, it has been suggested that not all subgroups of patients might benefit from regorafenib. The intention of this review is to provide an overview of the existing evidence for regorafenib in terms of efficacy, tolerability and quality of life in different subpopulations according to clinical and biological characteristics. Additionally, the magnitude of the clinical benefit provided by regorafenib to these patients has been explored and whether there are poorer outcomes in certain subpopulations.     

Does palliative care improve outcomes for patients with incurable illness? A review of the evidence

Patients with incurable illness experience considerable physical and psychological distress, which negatively impacts their quality of life. Palliative care clinicians primarily seek to alleviate suffering, enhance coping with symptoms, and enable informed decision making. In this article, we review the efficacy of various palliative care interventions to improve patients' quality of life, physical and psychological symptoms, satisfaction with care, family caregiver outcomes, health-service utilization, and quality of end-of-life care. We have identified 22 randomized studies that evaluate the efficacy of various palliative care interventions. Palliative care research has been hampered by methodological challenges related to attrition and missing data due to progressive illness and death. In addition, interventions to date have varied widely in the focus and extent of services, with only eight studies entailing direct clinical care by palliative care specialists, making comparisons across trials challenging. Despite these limitations, accumulating evidence shows that palliative care interventions do improve patients' quality of life, satisfaction with care, and end-of-life outcomes. Five of seven studies which examined quality of life as a primary outcome reported a statistically significant difference favoring the palliative care intervention. Ten studies examined patient and/or family caregiver satisfaction with care, and seven of these reported greater satisfaction with palliative care intervention. However, data are lacking to support the benefit of palliative interventions for reducing patients' physical and psychological symptoms. We conclude the review by discussing the major obstacles and future directions in evaluating and implementing standardized palliative care interventions.     

Can the survival of patients with recurrent disease after curative resection of colorectal cancer be prolonged by the administration of cimetidine?

Administration of cimetidine after curative surgery can improve prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer. In this study, we analyzed whether cimetidine can influence the survival of patients with a recurrent disease after colorectal surgery. The subjects were 29 patients with recurrent disease: 14 patients were administered with cimetidine and 15 patients were not. In the cimetidine administered group, seven cases were recurrent in the liver, 5 cases in a local site and 1 case in the lymph node, whereas 7 cases were recurrent in the liver, 4 cases in a local site and 3 cases in the lung for the non-cimetidine administered group. There were no significant differences for both groups in terms of patient's survival after recurrence. Although it was not significant, the patient's survival after curative resection of recurrent disease for the cimetidine administered group was better than the non cimetidine administered group. Although the results did not show cimetidine could influence the overall survival of the patients after recurrence, it might be possible to improve the survival of the patients after resection of the recurrent disease.     

Does preoperative therapy optimize outcomes in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer?

The objective of this study was to compare survival between all patients with radiographically resectable adenocarcinoma of the proximal pancreas who underwent preoperative chemoradiation therapy (PRE‐OP CRT) or surgical exploration first (SURGERY) with “intention to resect.” Pancreatic cancer patients who undergo resection after PREOP CRT live longer than patients who undergo resection without PREOP CRT, a difference that may be attributable to patient selection. We retrospectively identified 236 patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma seen between 1999 and 2007 with sufficient data to be confirmed medically and radiographically resectable. The outcomes of 144 patients who underwent PREOP CRT were compared to those of 92 patients who proceeded straight to SURGERY. The groups were similar in age and gender. Tumors were slightly larger in the PREOP CRT group (mean 2.5 cm vs. 2.1 cm, P < 0.01), and there were trends toward more venous abutment (54% vs. 39%, P = 0.06) and a higher Charlson comorbidity index (P = 0.1). In the PREOP CRT group, 76 patients (53%) underwent resection, 28 (19%) had metastatic and 17 (12%) locally unresectable disease after PREOP CRT, and 23 (16%) were not explored due to performance status or loss to follow‐up. In the SURGERY group, 68 patients (74%) underwent resection. Sixteen patients (17%) had metastatic and eight patients (9%) locally unresectable disease at exploration. In patients who underwent resection, the PREOP CRT group had smaller pathologic tumor size and lower incidence of positive lymph nodes than the SURGERY group but no difference in positive margins or need for vascular resection. Median overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing resection was 27 months in the PREOP CRT group and 17 months in the SURGERY group (P = 0.04). Median OS in all patients treated with PREOP CRT or surgically explored with intention to resect was 15 and 13 months, respectively, with superimposable survival curves. Despite a lower resection rate, the PREOP CRT group as a whole had a similar OS to the SURGERY group as a whole. For patients who underwent resection, those in the PREOP CRT had longer survival than those in the SURGERY group, suggesting that PREOP CRT allows better patient selection for resection. PREOP CRT should be considered an acceptable alternative for most patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 2012; 106:111–118. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Does chemotherapy prior to liver resection increase the potential for cure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer? A report from the European Colorectal Metastases Treatment Group

Liver resection offers the only chance of cure for patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Typically, the 5-year survival rates following liver resection range from 25% to 40%. Unfortunately, approximately 85% of patients with stage IV CRC have liver disease which is considered unresectable at presentation. However, the rapid expansion in the use of improved combination therapy regimens has increased the percentage of patients eligible for potentially curative surgery. Despite this, the selection criteria for patients potentially suitable for resection are not well documented and patient management by multidisciplinary teams, although essential, is still evolving. The goal of the European Colorectal Metastases Treatment Group is to establish pan-European guidelines for the treatment of patients with CRC liver metastases that can be adopted more widely by established treatment centres and to develop more accurate staging systems and evaluation criteria.     

What is the impact of cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma?

The impact of cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is discussed herein with consideration of prolonged survival and quality of life. A nephrectomy can be indicated in a patient with good performance status and pulmonary metastases when adjuvant immunotherapy is an option. In contrast, in a patient with poor performance status and/or metastases including multiple organs, a nephrectomy is not indicated. To relieve symptoms, options other than nephrectomy should be considered.     

Do individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer adhere to medical recommendations for the prevention of colorectal cancer?

Individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer (CRC), have a two-to-five-fold increased lifetime risk to develop CRC. Thus, they are particularly likely to benefit from adherence to medical recommendations for CRC prevention. Despite this increased risk, previous studies have shown an underutilization of colonoscopy for screening and a paucity of data on lifestyle habits that could enhance colonoscopy rates in this population. The primary aims were (a) to assess CRC screening patterns and lifestyle choices among siblings and children of CRC patients, (b) to ascertain discrepancies between actual behavior and medical recommendations, and (c) to identify family members with multiple unhealthy lifestyle habits. The secondary aim was to test for possible associations between utilization rates for CRC screening and other preventive health services. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 318 first-degree relatives (FDRs) of 164 CRC patients treated at the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center. Interviews were conducted with a structured questionnaire. There was significant underutilization of colonoscopy for screening with only 73 FDRs (23.0 %) adhering to the recommended screening schedule. This rate was slightly improved (N = 58, 31.9 %) among subjects aged 40 years and above, although it was still far below the optimum. A similar result (N = 70, 21.7 %) was observed for other cancer screening tests and routine medical check-ups. A significant association (P < 0.0001) was found for healthful lifestyles, overall use of preventive health services, and adherence to CRC screening recommendations. CRC screening is significantly underutilized among FDRs of CRC patients. FDRs who do not comply with CRC screening guidelines, lead unhealthy lifestyles, and avoid other cancer screening tests are at increased risk and should be addressed specifically in future interventions.