血液透析患者透析充分性的监测

目的　评价血液透析充分性的临床标准和尿素动力学模型 (UKM )参数 ,并观察透析后尿素反跳 (PDUR)对评价的影响。方法　按临床标准分为透析充分组 (Ⅰ组 )和透析不充分组 (Ⅱ组 ) ,分别计算PDUR以及反跳前后UKM参数即尿素清除指数 (Kt/V)、尿素时间平均浓度(TACurea)、蛋白分解率 (PCR)。结果　两组PDUR、尿量以及反跳前后的UKM参数存在显著性差异(P <0 .0 1) ;G S图显示Ⅱ组临床和参数判断基本一致 ,但Ⅰ组存在较大差异 ;平均PDUR为 17.8% ,反跳后的Kt/V、PCR值较反跳前分别下降 18.7%和 12 .7% ,而TACurea值增加 3 .1% ,PDUR与透析间尿量呈负相关 (r=-0 .64 )。结论　透析充分性评价是一连续非短期过程 ,宜综合临床和参数指标判断 ,以后者为主 ;忽视PDUR将高估透析充分性 ,宜用透析后尿素平衡浓度计算参数 ;透析不充分和残存肾功能可能影响PDUR程度。     

Conventional blood sampling versus On-Line Clearance Monitoring

On-line Clearance Monitoring (OCM) calculates the Kt/V during a dialysis session using a module incorporated into the Fresenius 4008 H/S haemodialysis machine (1). The method is based on repeated increments in dialysate sodium concentrations followed by measuring the change of dialysate sodium concentration after the dialysate has passed through the kidney. OCM is a patient friendly, non-invasive and easy method for measuring Kt/V. Kt/V calculated on single-pool urea kinetics according to Daugirdas was compared to Kt/V measured by OCM in thirty stable patients on chronic haemodialysis. Patients were dialysed using a dialyser with either a high-flux polysulfone or a haemophane membrane. In four patients OCM was measured in ten consecutive sessions to assess the intra-individual variation in OCM. The calculated Kt/V was compared to Kt/Vocm in three patients at five consecutive dialysis sessions to measure the intra-individual correlation. A linear correlation was present between Kt/Vocal and Kt/Vac for both the polysulfone and haemophane membrane. Intra-individual Kt/Vocm showed very stable values with an average variation of less than 5%. Intra-individual correlation between calculated Kt/V and Kt/Vocm was high.     

应用尿素动力学模型评价血透患者透析充分性和营养状态的临床研究

应用尿素动力学参数时间平均尿素浓度（TACurea）、整体尿素清除率（KT／V）、蛋白质分解代谢率（PCR），对42例维持性血液透析患者透析充分性及营养状态进行评价，并与临床结果进行比较，发现TACurea和PCR是反映血液透析长期充分与否的重要指标．KT／V可直接反映单次透析效果，是调整透析方案的最佳指标．在透析不充分的情况下，KT／V对PCR有着重要影响．     

Influence of post haemodialysis sampling on Kt/V result

The recommended Kt/V is 1.2. Unfortunately there is no written policy for nurses on the procedure for taking blood urea nitrogen samples post haemodialysis. The aim of this study was to establish the Kt/V variability of haemodialysis patients depending on the method of collection of post-haemodialysis blood urea nitrogen. Twenty-two patients were analysed. A Kt/V was performed every 15 days during a period of 2 months. It was taken five times on each patient: 30 minutes before the end of a haemodialysis session (Kt/V30), at the end of haemodialysis (Kt/V1), after slowing flows (50 ml/min) for 2 minutes (Kt/V2) and after the blood circuit had been returned to the patient at 5 and 15 minutes respectively. (Kt/V5, Kt/V15). The Kt/V results were: Kt/V1 1.23 +/- 0.2 Vs Kt/V2 1.14 +/- 0.19 (p < 0.003); Kt/V5- 1.05 +/- 0.19 (p < 0.002 Vs Kt/V2); Kt/V15 1 +/- 0.16 (p < 0.05 Vs Kt/V5); Kt/V30 1.12 +/- 0.21 (pNS Vs Kt/V2). In conclusion, there was a large variability in the Kt/V depending on the method of collection of the blood urea nitrogen sample post-haemodialysis.     

透析液流量对血液透析充分性的影响

目的：观察增加透析液流量（Qd）对维持性血液透析（MHD）患者透析充分性的影响。方法：随机选择稳定透析6个月以上的MHD患者38例。血透透析液流量定于500ml／min和800ml／min各透析4周，其他透析参数[透析时间，血流量（Qb），超滤量和透析器型号与面积]不变。每种Qd量于第3周和第4周分别测定透析前后血尿素氮（BUN）、血肌酐（SCr）水平，记录每次透析的透析时间、超滤量及透析后体重（W），并根据Kt／V的自然对数公式计算Kt／V、尿素下降率（URR），取2次测定值的平均值作为患者该透析液流量的Kt／V。同时检测第4周及第8周透析前的血红蛋白（Hb）和红细胞压积（Hct）水平。采用成对t检验和卡方检验进行统计学分析。结果：本研究中每例患者构成自身对照，研究前后一般情况完全一致。Qd为800ml／min时URR及Kt／V值均较Qd流量为500ml／min时增加，具有统计学意义（P〈0．05），而SCr下降率、Hb和Hct水平略有增加趋势，无显著性差异。Qd为800ml／min时透析后URR〉65％的百分数明显高于Qd为500ml／min时，具有显著统计学意义（P〈0．001）。结论：将Qd从500ml／min增加至800ml／min，可显著增加URR、增加Kt／V，提高透析充分性达标率。800ml／min透析液流量的MHD可选择性用于不便于延长治疗时间和提高血流量达到透析充分性的患者。     

Monitoring hemodialysis dose with ionic dialisance in on-line hemodiafiltration

Until now, with the ionic dialysance measurement, it has been possible to determine hemodialysis dose in each session of hemodialysis (HD) and in the conventional hemofiltration (HDF) but not in the modality of on-line HDF. Recently it is possible with a new biosensor that allows to measure the dose in on-line HDF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of this biosensor in different dialysis situations comparing the dialysis dose measured in blood in comparison with the values obtained from the sensor. We have analysed 192 hemodialysis sessions performed in 24 patients, 15 male and 9 female, mean age of 70.2 +/- 12 years, included in on-line HDF. All treatments were done using 4008H (Fresenius) monitor equipped with on-line clearance monitoring (OCM), that measure, with non invasive monitoring, the effective ionic dialysance equivalent to urea clearance. Every patient received eight dialysis sessions: one with dialysate flow (Qd) 500 ml/min, two with HD and Qd 800 ml/min and five with on-line HDF. Other habitual haemodialysis parameters were no changed, dialysis time 200 +/- 63 min (135-300) and blood flow 421 +/- 29 ml/min (350-450). Initial and final ionic dialysance values (K), final Kt, Kt/V measured with OCM using V of Watson, and Kt/V determined in blood pre and postdialysis concentrations of urea (Daugirdas second generation), were measured. The mean of initial K was 251 +/- 21 ml/min and the final K was 234 +/- 24 ml/min. The Kt measured with OCM was 50.6 +/- 17 L, 51.2 +/- 17 in men and 49.7 +/- 16 in women. The V (Watson) was 34.5 +/- 6 L. The Kt/V measured with the Kt of OCM and V was 1,499 +/- 0.54 and Kt/V measured in blood samples was 1,742 +/- 0.58. The correlation between both values was 0.956. The Kt was different according to dialysis modality used: in HD and Qd 500 was 44.7 +/- 15 L, in HD and Qd 800 was 50.7 +/- 17 and in on-line HDF (22.1 +/- 7 L of reposition volume), was 51.8 +/- 17 L. The Kt/V from blood samples also shows variation: in HD and QD 500 was 1.60 +/- 0.55, in HD and Qd 800 was 1,726 +/- 0.56 and in on-line HDF was 1,776 +/- 0.59. In this study has been observed a close correlation between the new biosensor OCM with the measures obtained from the blood samples. For this reason this sensor it is useful in all modalities of dialysis treatment, included on-line HDF. The sensor was able to discriminate the efficacy of different dialysis modalities used in this study.     

Does dialysis therapy improve autonomic and peripheral nervous system abnormalities in chronic uraemia?

OBJECTIVES: Autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysfunction and peripheral neuropathy occur in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Adequate renal replacement therapy should prevent development or correct these abnormalities. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: We studied retrospectively ANS and peripheral neuropathy in 32 patients with chronic uraemia who received either haemodialysis (16) or peritoneal dialysis (16) therapy, and compared the observed dialysis efficiency with changes in neurological function. METHODS: Heart rate variability (HRV) time domain indices and peripheral sensory nerve conduction studies were followed for a mean of 2.9 years. The adequacy of haemodialysis (HD) efficiency was estimated by Kt/V, an index of fractional urea clearance. Adequacy of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) was estimated on the basis of the patient's wellbeing and nutritional status as excellent, satisfactory or poor. Based on observed changes in HRV time domain measures, the observations were divided in three subgroups: improved, unchanged or deteriorated. RESULTS: The peripheral sensory nerve conduction studies were abnormal in 38% of the patients and did not change significantly during the study. Improvement in HRV time domain measures occurred in HD patients with mean Kt/V > 1.20 or in CAPD patients with satisfactory or excellent response to dialysis treatment. Values of Kt/V < 0.85 in HD patients were associated with progressive deterioration of autonomic neuropathy. Diabetic patients (n = 4) differed from others as their HRV was grossly abnormal and did not improve. CONCLUSIONS: The adequacy of haemodialysis is a predictor of improvement of cardiac autonomic nervous function in chronic uraemia. The same trend of improvement was seen also in CAPD patients.     

ON‐LINE CLEARANCE MONITORING FOR BLOOD ACCESS MANAGEMENT

On‐line Clearance Monitoring (OCM) provides frequent and precise information about urea clearance values during haemodialysis. In the case of blood access recirculation, it is presumed that urea clearance values on OCM would be lower and suspect to blood access malfunction. In order to check the relation between significantly lower urea clearance values and blood access recirculation, the Kt value (Clearance × time/min) for fifteen patients on OCM, including the patients with a low Kt/V in spite of their small urea distribution volume (V) was observed. Average urea clearance was calculated indirectly using Kt value (Kt/time in minutes = average clearance ml/min) and blood access recirculation tests performed using slow/stop flow two‐needle, three samples method (urea method). After comparison of the recirculation percentage to clearance value, positive correlation between high recirculation and clearance reduction was noted. OCM alongside detection of haemodialysis inefficiency is also a practical instrument for blood access management between regular monitoring. Lower OCM urea clearance values demonstrate a possible blood access problem that can be confirmed with another method. When an OCM urea clearance reading is decreased by more than 25%, undiscovered access recirculation can be suspected.     

On-line clearance monitoring for blood access management

On-line Clearance Monitoring (OCM) provides frequent and precise information about urea clearance values during haemodialysis. In the case of blood access recirculation, it is presumed that urea clearance values on OCM would be lower and suspect to blood access malfunction. In order to check the relation between significantly lower urea clearance values and blood access recirculation, the Kt value (Clearance x time/min) for fifteen patients on OCM, including the patients with a low Kt/V in spite of their small urea distribution volume (V) was observed. Average urea clearance was calculated indirectly using Kt value (Kt/time in minutes = average clearance ml/min) and blood access recirculation tests performed using slow/stop flow two-needle, three samples method (urea method). After comparison of the recirculation percentage to clearance value, positive correlation between high recirculation and clearance reduction was noted. OCM alongside detection of haemodialysis inefficiency is also a practical instrument for blood access management between regular monitoring. Lower OCM urea clearance values demonstrate a possible blood access problem that can be confirmed with another method. When an OCM urea clearance reading is decreased by more than 25%, undiscovered access recirculation can be suspected.     

Evaluation of pre- and postdilutional on-line hemodiafiltration adequacy by partial dialysate quantification and on-line urea monitor.

On-line highflux hemodiafiltration (HDF) is a clinically interesting and effective mode of renal replacement therapy, which offers the possibility to obtain an increased removal of both small and large solutes. The fundamental role of urea kinetic monitoring to assess dialysis adequacy in conventional hemodialysis has been widely studied. Both direct measurement of the urea removed by the modified direct dialysate quantitation (mDDQ) based on partial dialysate collection (PDC) and dialysate-based urea kinetic modeling (DUKM) using urea monitor have been advocated. The validity of this assessment tool in the patients with on-line HDF remained unclear. The aims of this investigation were (1) to compare the delivered Kt/V, urea mass removal (UMR), solute removal index (SRI) and normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR) between pre- and postdilutional high-flux HDF; (2) to verify and compare the efficiency of pre- and postdilutional HDF using DUKM with on-line dialysate urea sensor, and mDDQ with partial dialysate collection. During both mode of HDF, the paired analysis urea removed and Kt/V showed no significant difference. Using mDDQ, mean values for predilutional mode were as follows: Kt/V 1.53 +/- 0.01 UMR, 16.8 +/- 0.3 g/session; urea clearance 178 +/- 18 ml/min; SRI 75.5 +/- 7.7%; urea distribution volume (V) 28.3 +/- 1.2 liters; nPCR 1.34 +/- 0.18 g/kg/day; on the other hand, mean values for postdilutional mode were Kt/V 1.58 +/- 0.01; UMR 17.10 +/- 0.28 g/session; urea clearance 184 +/- 21 ml/min; SRI 77.2 +/- 3.5%; urea distribution volume, 27.8 +/- 1.5 liters; nPCR 1.34 +/- 0.19 g/kg/day. The mean value of urea generation rate was 5.82 +/- 1.12 mg/min during HDF. Our results showed that dialysis adequacy was achieved with both high-volume predilutional HDF and postdilutional HDF. These two modes of HDF provided similar and adequate small solute clearance. In addition, we found that on-line analysis of urea kinetics is a reliable tool for quantifying and assuring delivery of adequate dialysis.     

Determination of the dose of dialysis with integrated modules in the same monitor

The "gold standard" method to measure the mass balance achieved during dialysis for a given solute is based on the total dialysate collection. This procedure is unfeasible and too cumbersome. For this reason, alternative methods have been proposed including the urea kinetic modelling (Kt/V), the measurement of effective ionic dialysance (Diascan), and the continuous spent sampling of dialysate (Quantiscan). The aim of this study was to compare the reliability and agreement of these two methods with the formulas proposed by the urea kinetic modelling for measuring the dialysis dose and others haemodialysis parameters. We studied 20 stable patients (16 men/4 women) dialyzed with a monitor equipped with the modules Diascan (DC) and Quantiscan (QC) (Integra. Hospal). The urea distribution volume (VD) was determined using anthropometric data (Watson equation) and QC data. Kt/V value was calculated according to Daurgidas 2nd generation formula corrected for the rebound (eKt/V), and using DC (Kt/VDC) and QC (Kt/VQC) data. The total mass of urea removed was calculated as 37,93 +/- 16 g/session. The VD calculated using Watson equation was 35.7 +/- 6.6 and the VDQC was 35.06 +/- 9.9. And they showed an significative correlation (r:0,82 p < 0.001). The (VDQC-VDWatson) difference was -0.64 +/- 5.8L (ns). Kt/VDC was equivalent to those of eKt/V (1.64 +/- 0.33 and 1.61 +/- 0.26, mean difference -0.02 +/- 0.29). However, Kt/VQC value was higher than eKt/V (1.67 +/- 0.22 and 1.61 +/- 0.26 mean difference 0.06 +/- 0.07 p < 0.01). Both values correlated highly (R2: 0.92 p < 0.001). Urea generation (C) calculated using UCM was 8.75 +/- 3.4 g/24 h and those calculated using QC was 8.64 +/- 3.21 g/24 h. Mean difference 0.10 +/- 1.14 (ns). G calculated by UCM correlated highly with that derived from QC (R2: 0.88 p < 0.001). In conclusion, Kt/VDC and Kt/VQC should be considered as valid measures for dialysis efficiency. However, the limits of agreement between Kt/VQC and eKt/V were closer than Kt/VDC.     

Bedeutung von PET und Kt/V für die Peritonealdialyse

PET should be monitored 4 weeks after the start of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and then yearly, and Kt/V every 3 months. PET makes it possible to determine different velocities of glucose absorption (from the dialysate) and of the transport of such low-molecular-weight substances as creatinine and urea (from blood to dialysate), and in particular to calculate the prognosis of the long-term ultrafiltration capacity of the peritoneum in each PD patient. Kt/V is a measure of the urea clearance both of the peritoneum and of the actual kidneys; it seems that preservation of any residual renal function has a more significant positive influence on patient survival and on the technical course than does an increase of the dialysis dose. It is accepted that PD is working efficiently when Kt/V is over 1.7. Besides PET and Kt/V clinical (well-being, eating behaviour, whether body weight is steady, functional capacity) and other (blood pressure, neurological status, degree of anaemia, calcium/phosphate ratio) criteria are also important in the evaluation of whether PD treatment is adequate.     

Correlates of urea kinetic modeling during hemodialysis in patients with acute renal failure

The current guidelines on dialysis adequacy in acute renal failure (ARF) are loosely defined and have been extrapolated from patients with end-stage renal disease. The objectives of this study were (1) to compare three methods of urea kinetic modeling measurement in patients with ARF receiving intermittent hemodialysis, (2) to compare prescribed to delivered dose of dialysis, and (3) to explore the factors that are associated with dialysis delivery. 'Single-pool' urea kinetic modeling was assessed by the Ureakin) software and the second-generation equation which uses a logarithmic estimate of spKt/V. 'Equilibrated' Kt/V (eKt/V) was calculated using the rate adjustment equation. The prescribed dose was derived using the manufacturer's specifications of the dialyzer clearance, prescribed time, actual delivered blood and dialysate flow, and estimates of volume of urea distribution. A total of 78 consecutive spKt/V measurements were obtained in 24 patients. The mean urea reduction ratio was 51 +/- 1%. The delivered spKt/V was significantly lower than that prescribed (0.87 +/- 0.03 or 0.83 +/- 0.03 vs. 1.28 +/- 0.05; p = 0.0001). The equilibrated Kt/V was markedly lower than the delivered spKt/V (0.73 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.83 +/- 0.03; p = 0.0001). Univariate analyses demonstrated that female gender, low body mass index, low predialysis weight, use of cellulose acetate dialyzers, and increased prescribed time were associated with increased odds of prescribed spKt/V > or =1.2. Similarly, old age, increased delivered time, and high cytokine production were associated with increased odds of delivered spKt/V > or =1.2. In summary, while the impact of delivered intermittent hemodialysis on the survival of patients with ARF remains to be determined, these results indicate that dialysis delivery is suboptimal in ARF, and empiric dosing should strongly consider factors related to lean body mass, including age and gender.     

Cardiovascular complications versus adequacy and peritoneal transport characteristics in CAPD patients

The aim of the study was a comparative analysis of cardiovascular status and basic parameters of adequacy and peritoneal transport in CAPD patients. 15 persons treated with CAPD over 2 years were included in the study. Cardiovascular status at the beginning and at the end of observation was assessed using the own scoring. Patients were divided into 3 groups of cardiovascular disease (CVD) progression: group I--without CDV progression, group II--with moderate CVD progression and group III--with severe CVD progression. The biochemical factors of CVD risk at the beginning and the end of observation were also measured. The adequacy and peritoneal transport parameters (Kt/V, CrCl and D/P creatinine) were calculated. Group I was characterized by the highest average Kt/V value as well as percent of Kt/V studies > or = 2.0. These values were significantly lower in group II and III. The average CrCl value was highest in group I and lowest in group II. The relatively high, significant reverse correlation between Kt/V and CVD scoring at the end of observation was revealed. Lower but significant correlation between serum albumin and CVD scoring at the end of observation was also established. The analysis of the link between CVD progression and changes of transport characteristics in studied population revealed the highest peritoneal transport in group III from the beginning of observation. The undesirable change of peritoneal transport characteristics was stated in group II and III. The results of our study let us to conclude that in observed population only high values of adequacy parameters reduced the risk of CVD progression. Kt/V seems to be better predictor of CVD progression than CrCl. The risk of CVD in CAPD patients is probably higher due to increase of peritoneal permeability.     

残余肾功能状态对腹膜透析效能的影响

目的:前瞻性观察终末期肾衰(ESRF)患者在腹膜透析(PD)治疗后残余肾功能(RRF)对透析效能及相关临床指标之间的影响。方法:所有患者按残余肾小球滤过率(rGFR)水平将其分为A组(GFR0~2ml/min)、B组(GFR2·1~4ml/min)和C组(GFR>4ml/min)。每3个月进行一次临床随访,全面评估患者的全身情况及透析状态,包括血压、身高、体重、体重指数(BMI)、尿量(UV)、残余肾肌酐清除率(Ccr)、每周总尿素氮表现率(Kt/Vtotal)、每周肌酐总清除率(WCcrtotal)、蛋白氮呈现率(nPNA)、残余肾尿素及Ccr。对比观察不同RRF状态患者透析状况和部分临床及生化指标变化。尿量<100ml/d或Ccr<1·0ml/min视为无尿。结果:三组不同残肾状态患者Kt/vtotal和Ccr分别为1·75±0·35、2·07±0·54、2·46±0·50和53·4±11·2、66·6±11·2、97·6±22·1(L/Wks),各组之间差异非常显著(P<0·001)。三组不同残余肾Kt/v和Ccr分别占总体kt/v的12·4%、27%、45·7%及总体Ccr的18·3%、47·3%和65·3%,三组间相比差异亦显著(P<0·01)。此外,三组间高血压发生率、心胸比例及左心室肥厚(LVH)亦存在一定差异,C组心脏增大的病例明显低于A、B两组。RRF状态与透析效能呈正相关。本组患者除2例在透析治疗时即无尿,128例患者中有31例(24·2%)发生无尿,其中原发病为血管炎综合征及糖尿病肾病各占4例和7例,其无尿发生率分别占本病种的66·7%及25·9%;另20例无尿患者为肾小球肾炎或其它疾病,占此类疾病的20·6%。此外,发生无尿患者中有5例(16·1%)透析时尿量<300ml/d。结论:PD患者的残余肾仍然是清除体内代谢产物的重要途径,同时也影响血压及心血管系统并发症。     

El Kt/V alto,a diferencia del Kt,se asocia a mayor mortalidad: importancia de la V baja

Introduction

Kt/V has been used as a synonym for haemodialysis dose. Patient survival improved with a Kt/V > 1; this target was subsequently increased to 1.2 and 1.3. The HEMO study revealed no significant relationship between Kt/V and mortality. The relationship between Kt/V and mortality often shows a J-shaped curve. Is V the confounding factor in this relationship? The objective of this study is to determine the relationship between mortality and Kt/V, Kt and body water content (V) and lean mass (bioimpedance).

Ionic dialysance and quality control in hemodialysis

Quantification of dialysis is based on the measurement of effective urea clearance (K), dialysis dose (Kt) or normalized dialysis dose (Kt/V). During the last 20 years, Kt/V was the single parameter actually useful for quantifying dialysis efficiency, because it can be calculated from just blood or dialysate urea concentrations at the beginning and at the end of the dialysis session. However the calculation of the normalized dialysis dose (Kt/V) actually delivered to the patient cannot be performed during each dialysis session, because of the need of urea concentration measurements. Ionic dialysance is a new parameter easily measured on-line, non-invasively, automatically and without any cost during each dialysis session by a conductivity method. Because ionic dialysance has been proved equal to the effective urea clearance taking into account cardiopulmonary and access recirculation, it is becoming an actual quality-assurance parameter of the dialysis efficiency.